Does DOJ actually agree with "a couple of law professors beating a drum on Twitter"?
Why did Justices Kagan and Sotomayor, but not Justice Jackson, join Justice Barrett's dissent?
Kagan: "Kavanaugh, J. (recognizing that the argument may be forfeited, but opining on it anyway)."
"Mike Pence wouldn't listen to me, so let me blast his lawyers in the N.Y. Times."
Justice Barrett countered that the SumRev "did not change the content of federal law."
"The fundamental question in any system of government is: Who decides?"
Justices Breyer and Sotomayor did it a lot.
The former professor's opinion reads like an impromptu lecture.
"A sustained campaign of condemnation isn’t going to push these judges to write liberal opinions, but it could chasten them toward more moderate ones."
26 Teams of HS Students presented oral argument in Students for Fair Admission v. UNC
No, it was not Dobbs or Bruen.
The provision applies to "Senators and Representatives," not to the President of the Senate.
Modern-day efforts to sabotage fox hunts.
Judge Matey's concurrence sketches out the original meaning of "involuntary servitude."
When you say someone is wrong, quote them, to ensure you are properly attributing their view.
President Biden goes off script on abortion.
The Evarts Act of 1892 established the modern-day circuit courts of appeals.
Judges cannot take the Supreme Court's silence as a ground to subvert Supreme Court precedent.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks