MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

Tim May, Father of 'Crypto Anarchy,' Is Dead at 66

The Cypherpunk co-founder was a major influence on both bitcoin and WikiLeaks.

Tim May, 2017Jim EpsteinTim May, co-founder of the influential Cypherpunks mailing list and a significant influence on both bitcoin and WikiLeaks, passed away last week at his home in Corralitos, California. The news was announced Saturday on a Facebook post written by his friend Lucky Green.

In his influential 1988 essay, "The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto," May predicted that advances in computer technology would eventually allow "individuals and groups to communicate and interact with each other" anonymously and without government intrusion. "These developments will alter completely the nature of government regulation [and] the ability to tax and control economic interactions," he wrote.

A deeply private person, May's aversion to outside intrusions defined his philosophical outlook. "'Leave me alone,'" he wrote, is "at the root of libertarianism more so than formal theories about the nature of man."

"My political philosophy is keep your hands off my stuff....Out of my files, out of my office, off what I eat, drink, and smoke," he once told journalist Andy Greenberg.

Born in 1951, May grew up in in a suburb of San Diego before his family moved to Washington, D.C., when his father, a naval officer, was transferred there. At the age of 12, he joined a local gun club at the urging of his father and would become a lifelong collector. May was a loner, a science prodigy, and a voracious consumer of science fiction. In the summer of 1967, when entering his junior year in high school, he picked up a copy of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. "It just spoke to me," he said in a 2017 unpublished video interview with Reason, which is being incorporated into a documentary. "I read it nonstop for three days, and to the disdain of my teachers in school, I would write articles about the Anti-Trust Act and the evils of the Sherman Act."

May went to college at U.C.–Santa Barbara, took graduate physics classes, and got a job at Intel. He solved a crucial issue plaguing the functioning of memory chips, publishing his findings in a 1979 paper, and then retired in 1986 at the age of 34, cashing in his stock options. He would never have to work again.

In 1987, May's friend Chip Morningstar introduced him to the economist and entrepreneur Phil Salin—a meeting that would lead May to formulate the concept of crypto anarchy.

Salin was building the American Information Exchange, or AMiX, the first online marketplace for buying and selling information. "It was clear he was a strong libertarian of the Hayek sort," May recalled. "We all shared the same views." But Salin's vision of an e-commerce platform that would reduce transaction costs, facilitate cross-border trade, and make localized expertise more widely available didn't resonate with May's anarchism.

"People aren't going to be selling meaningless stuff like surfboard recommendations," he told Salin. May recalled suggesting that instead it could serve as "a high-tech version of Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden," paraphrasing himself.* "Or someone who can exfiltrate bomber plans for that B-1 Bomber." May later fleshed out his idea, calling "BlackNet," where "nation-states, export laws, patent laws, national security considerations and the like [are considered] relics of the pre-cyberspace era."

Tim May, ca. 1994He also perceived a crucial flaw: BlackNet couldn't function without a non-governmental digital currency. "I admitted to Phil the big problem was untraceable payments," he recalled. "They can be tracked when they send their Visa information." The next day, May dug up a copy of the October 1985 copy of Communications of the ACM featuring a cover story by cryptographer David Chaum, titled "Security Without Identification: Transaction Systems to Make Big Brother Obsolete."

"It was an epiphany," May recalled. "It was like standing on top of the mountain and seeing that this is out there."

Chaum's work applied the tools of cryptography—mathematical techniques for sending secret messages—to real-world problems. His 1985 article sketched out a new digital currency system that used cryptography to hide a purchaser's identity. May saw Chaum's scheme as deeply flawed, but came away convinced that a decentralized, non-governmental digital money system was possible. Chaum's work also led him to focus on the political implications of public-key cryptography, a system first described in a 1976 paper that allowed perfect strangers to exchange secret messages and establish provable, pseudonymous identities.

May became convinced that public-key cryptography combined with networked computing would break apart social power structures. It would create a virtual space that May compared to "Galt's Gulch," the fictional Colorado community in Atlas Shrugged where Rand's heroes go to escape government intrusion and establish a capitalist paradise.

In September of 1988, May sat down at his Macintosh Plus "for an hour and a half" to bang out an essay loosely patterned after The Communist Manifesto. He titled it "The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto." Running 497 words, it was his most influential piece of writing.

"Just as the technology of printing altered and reduced the power of medieval guilds and the social power structure," he wrote, "so too will cryptologic methods fundamentally alter the nature of corporations and of government interference in economic transactions."

In September 1992, May and his friends Eric Hughes and Hugh Daniel came up with the idea of setting up an online mailing list to discuss their ideas. Within a few days of its launch, a hundred people had signed up for the Cypherpunks mailing list. (The group's name was coined by Hughes' girlfriend as a play on the "cyberpunk" genre of fiction.) By 1997, it averaged 30 messages daily with about 2,000 subscribers. May was its most prolific contributor.

May and Hughes, along with free speech activist John Gilmore, wore masks on the cover of the second issue of Wired magazine accompanying a profile by journalist Steven Levy, who described the Cypherpunks as "more a gathering of those who share a predilection for codes, a passion for privacy, and the gumption to do something about it."

Wired, May/June 1993WiredThe Cypherpunks list, which died down* shortly after September 11, 2001 ("a lot of people got cold feet about talking about this stuff"), was deeply influential at a time when the U.S. government was fighting to keep public-key cryptography out of the hands of the public. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was an active reader and participant on the list, contributing his first posts in 1995 under the name "Proff."

Assange's 2012 book Cypherpunks: Freedom and the Future of the Internet restated May's theory in grandiose terms, describing how "a strange property of the physical universe that we live in" (cryptography) made it possible to create "new lands barred to those who control physical reality."

Did bitcoin's pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, contribute to the Cypherpunks list under a different name? There's no way of knowing, but the core components of his invention incubated in its voluminous, technical correspondence. From the outset of their project, May and his fellow travelers were focused on creating an internet-based cryptographic currency shielded from government interference—completing the technical challenge Chaum had only begun to solve.

The British cryptographer Adam Back first proposed HashCash on the list, a system for creating digital scarcity (known as "proof of work") that was later cited in Nakamoto's white paper. Nick Szabo—the creator of "Bit Gold," who coined the phrase "smart contracts"—discussed his ideas on the list. Wei Dai, who Nakamoto contacted while formulating bitcoin, proposed his digital cash system, "b-money," on the list, citing May as a major influence.

Another major contributor was computer scientist Hal Finney, who died in 2014. Finney came up with the idea of using Back's technology to create an e-money; along with, Nakamoto he was the most important figure in bitcoin's early days.

May himself brought the attention of his fellow cypherpunks to a digital timestamping system developed by Stuart Haber and W. Scott Stornetta, a primitive version of what would become known as a blockchain. "I can see these connections that are not fully formed," May recalled. "I can just tell something is going to be important."

After the Cypherpunks list died down,* May's influence faded—until Nakamoto's 2008 bombshell. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency spawned a new generation of techno-libertarians self-identifying as Cypherpunks. May's writings started recirculating, and the movement found a new home: Parallel Polis, a three-story building in Prague, home to the Institute of Cryptoanarchy, which puts on an annual Hacker's Conference to advance the ideas of May and his fellow travelers.

May recently expressed disgust with the current state of the cryptocurrency community, citing its overpriced conferences and the advent of "bitcoin exchanges that have draconian rules about KYC, AML, passports, freezes on accounts and laws about reporting 'suspicious activity' to the local secret police."

"I think Satoshi would barf," he told CoinDesk in his last published interview. In my last exchange with May in November, he told me that he was done granting interviews with reporters, feeling burned out on the space. He preferred to spend his time playing with his new MIDI keyboard.

Did May's prediction of crypto anarchy turn out wrong, or is it too early to tell? In 2017, he was optimistic that many of the changes he foresaw in the late 1980s were beginning to take shape, speaking of a fork in the road—the world was moving toward either Leviathan or an "anarchic-type system." There would be no in-between.

More recently, he quoted the epitaph found on Ancient Roman gravestones: "I was not. I was. I am not. I don't care."

Rest in peace, Tim May.

[*] This post has been altered to clarify that May was paraphrasing his 1987 conversation with Phil Salin, as Manning and Snowden were not yet on the scene. It was also corrected to reflect that the Cypherpunks list wasn't dissolved after 9/11—it lost readers and influence. And it was corrected to indicate May's correct age at the time of death. He was born on December 21, 1951, making him 66 at time of death, not 67, as originally written.

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • DajjaI||

    For me being libertarian isn't about privacy. It's about not being thrown in jail or a mental hospital for speaking out. Anarchy would be a disaster. I don't need people secretly conspiring on innovative new ways to silence me. #riptimmay

  • 0x1000||

    Statism: where people are actively secretly plotting new ways to silence you. Yeah, way better than anarchy.

  • lovestatism1789||

    Statism is the last bastion of hope to preserve the American dream: a nation of dedicated conservatives who worship the American Flag and pay proper respect to the Constitution that lets us live free and own plenty of guns.

    If Hillary Clinton won the election then I might agree with you that statism is a danger to liberty. But because Trump is Making American Great Again by restoring our national heritage I find your objections misplaced. We should fear those who lust for anarchy as licentious communists trying to subvert our bedrock order and the rule of law.

  • 0x1000||

    Your wisdom and obvious love for statism has convinced me fully. My only criticism involves your failure to self-identify as a libertarian, but the content of your message makes that redundant anyway.

    A+, would read again.

  • Tamfang||

    Hugh Daniel, not Daniels.

  • John C. Randolph||

    Hugh may be the only person I've ever met who trusted government even less than I do. When we lost Hugh, I resolved to be more like him.

    -jcr

  • Echospinner||

    With developments like cryptocurrency and all of the other technology and economics I think lines on a map are becoming less relevant in how we think of government and nationality.

    If you look at how we do business for example an accountant 40 years ago working for Squibb & Squibb had to be physically located where the office was and trudge there every day. Now the same accountant could still work for the company yet never set foot in an office or physically meet his coworkers. He could be at his workstation in Colorado while serving his client in Maine and do a better job of it. Why can't a similar arrangement work for nationality defined as a virtual network, not a physical location and how would that work or not.

    I have been playing around with this idea. If I had any talent for writing it would make an interesting story to imagine how such a society could play out.

  • I am the 0.000000013%||

    I for one can't wait to take my Walmart citizenship oath

  • 0x1000||

    This only works where government, as it were, provides a service like conflict resolution or trash removal. Unfortunately, that's unexciting— driving MRAPs and flash banging babies in the drug war is far more tantalizing. Would people actually voluntarily pay for that type of 'service'?

    Would the entity violating people's rights get away with it as cleanly as the various governments now do?

    Is it's unworkableness a feature or a bug?

  • 0x1000||

    ^ reply to echospinner. Hard to argue for government reforms when you can't even get a decent comment system in place.

  • Echospinner||

    I am not arguing for anything. Just speculating out loud about what the future might be.

    So if I am a registered citizen of libertopia and the guy next door is a citizen of trumpland how would we work out trash or fire collection for example. I think that could be done though contracts and agreements between libertopia and trumpland.

    C'mon if I had writing skills would I be posting comments on Reason on a Saturday?

  • 0x1000||

    Haha. The argument thing was more toward Reason and their cruddy website.

    I, for one, look forward to a day when the market competes for my fire collection dollars.

  • John C. Randolph||

    David Friedman has written extensively on this subject.

    -jcr

  • Chipper Morning Baculum||

    Hm, so we lost two crypto-anarchists this year. RIP, Tim May.

  • John C. Randolph||

    I was very sorry to hear this. Hugh Daniel introduced me to him, and I hung out with Tim several times over the years. He was always interesting.

    -jcr

  • David Friedman||

    I was also sorry to hear it. I got back in touch with Tim recently, was hoping to get together. He is one of the people I dedicated _Future Imperfect_ to.

  • John C. Randolph||

    I should have guessed that you knew him. I remember talking with him once about how to handle criminal behavior in an AnCap society, and your name came up.

    -jcr

  • John C. Randolph||

    How many people have to report spam before you guys delete it?

    -jcr

  • SRoach||

    Twenty messages a day? Try fifty. People used to subscribe victims to the cypherpunks mailing list just to inundate their inbox.
    The "Unsubscribe me or I'm suing" messages were amusing, in their way.
    The cypherpunks mailing list was one of the first, if not the first, to institute an address verification system before a new subscriber got the firehose.

  • Dillinger||

    >>>"I was not. I was. I am not. I don't care."

    I love this. RIP Tim May.

  • SRoach||

    For those who want to do their own archive dive.
    https://mailing-list-archive.cryptoanarchy.wiki/
    It's a little fractured, with multiple duplicate messages.

  • perlchpr||

    I knew that dude. Went to his house for the 10 year c'punks meeting. Heh, with Lucky Green, among others.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online