MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

Top National Police Organization Declares Support for Modest Federal Sentencing Reforms

What did it take? A promise not to make mandatory minimum reductions retroactive.

Mitch McConnellMIKE THEILER/REUTERS/NewscomCould it be? The nation's biggest police organization publicly coming out in favor of criminal justice reform?

Yes, it's true. The National Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) has just announced its support for the FIRST STEP Act, a prison reform bill that eases up federal incarceration for nonviolent crimes by expanding eligibility for halfway houses, keeping federal inmates closer to their homes, and banning the shackling of pregnant inmates, among other changes aimed at scaling back the harshness of our federal prison system.

The bill passed the House in May, and the Senate is working on some changes to it. The Senate version of the bill would reform mandatory minimum sentencing to give judges more leeway. It would also make the 2010 Fair Sentencing Act retroactive. That bill changed the law to reduce penalties for crack cocaine convictions to make them match powder cocaine convictions.

The bill is fairly modest, given the current congressional dynamics. Even though it's polling well, its future was uncertain. On Friday, its chances were bolstered significantly by the FOP's announcement that it's on board:

"By individually targeting those offenders with the lowest risk to offend, law enforcement and correctional officers can better focus their resources," [FOP President Chuck] Canterbury explained. "The F.O.P. played a key role in making sure that truly dangerous offenders, like those who commit crimes while armed and those who traffic and deadly narcotics like fentanyl, are ineligible to participate in the First Step program."

Note that even as legislators and police recognize the bad consequences of treating crack cocaine like a uniquely dangerous threat deserving harsher punishment, they're falling into the trap of treating fentanyl as a unique threat—and ignoring how the government's own attack on the medical use of painkillers pushes people toward the more dangerous black-market drugs that are more likely to cause overdoses.

The press release notes that the lawmakers have gotten FOP's support by promising not to make other sentencing reforms (besides the Fair Sentencing Act) retroactive. So those handed mandatory minimum life sentences for a drug offense under federal three-strikes regulations cannot request mercy to get their sentences cut to 25 years. This seems cruel, but hey, it keeps prison guards on the job. The bill also earned FOP support by granting guards the authority to carry concealed firearms on prison property as long as they're outside the secure perimeter of the prison.

But regardless of the gaps in the bill, it would still make life better for thousands of people currently in prison for nonviolent drug crimes. And with Attorney General Jeff Sessions being shown the door, the bill's prospects for passage may be improving. Sessions opposed weakening mandatory minimum sentences, but President Donald Trump seems open to these modest reforms. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said he's going to see if he's got the votes to get it passed during the upcoming lame duck session.

Photo Credit: MIKE THEILER/REUTERS/Newscom

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Shirley Knott||

    Where's the eulogy for Stan Lee?

  • Chipper Morning Baculum||

  • perlchpr||

    :'(

  • Mr. Dyslexic||

    OT: Where the fuck is John Stossel? Is he off for the rest of the year?

    This place is becoming a drag...

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Note that even as legislators and police recognize the bad consequences of treating crack cocaine like a uniquely dangerous threat deserving harsher punishment, they're falling into the trap of treating fentanyl as a unique threat...

    If you want them to ease off fentanyl, you're going to have to supply a replacement existential threat.

  • dsquaredoutlet||

    I'm pretty sure that the point of the article is constant across most of the states. It's pretty common that if you have a criminal record you are barred from professional licensing, or at best you get to go through all the training and pay all the fees, and then ask for a professional licensing board to look at your case and decide for themselves if they'll deign to let you get licensed.

    marcelo burlon iphone 7

  • cheapmcmbelt||

    Thanks admin for giving such valuable information through your article . Your article is much more similar to http://www.mkoutletfire.com/mi.....g-red.html word unscramble tool because it also provides a lot of knowledge of vocabulary new words with its meanings.

  • JOIN WAL||

    I'm pretty sure that the point of the article is constant across most of the states. It's pretty common that if you have a criminal record you are barred from professional licensing, or at best you get to go through all the training and pay all the fees, and then ask for a professional licensing board to look at your case and decide for themselves if they'll deign to let you get licensed.www.Mesalary.com

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online