MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

Local News Spreads Panic About Under-18's Taking Uber and Lyft Unaccompanied

Ridesharing poses no particular dangers for minors.

Jonathan Weiss/Dreamstime.comJonathan Weiss/Dreamstime.comLocal news has seized on a new terror plaguing the nation: minors riding unaccompanied in Ubers and Lyfts.

Las Vegas ABC affiliate KTNV warned viewers yesterday that this "dangerous practice is rampant across Las Vegas and drivers say no one is trying to stop it." On Monday, Nashville's FOX 17 ran with a hard-hitting investigation of a 15-year-old who went undercover for the station in order to take an Uber to a coffee shop.

In February, D.C.'s FOX5 did a segment featuring a 12-year old who was shuttled from one parent's house to another alone, via Uber. That same month, NBC's Bay Area affiliate warned of a "state loophole" that "leaves minors at risk while riding Uber and Lyft."

The danger all these children are in apparently is that they run the risk of being kidnapped, assaulted, or worse, by whichever random psycho they connect with via ridesharing apps.

Amy Sulam-Gibbs, the mother of the 15-year-old in the FOX 17 story, told the station: "They can't do full psych evals on these drivers. You really are taking a risk. You're getting into a stranger from the internet's car."

The "loophole" that NBC believes is endangering minors is the fact that Uber and Lyft drivers do not need to be fingerprinted the same way daycare providers and school bus drivers are. Other stories blame the ridesharing companies for failing to better enforce their own terms of service, which specifically prohibit those under 18 from using the app.

Yet, for all the fearmongering, crimes committed against minors by ridesharing drivers are mercifully rare.

The KTNV story mentions only two examples of a minor being assaulted by their driver, one in Orange County, California the other in the Miami, Florida area. The NBC story mentions a third incident in which a driver exposed himself to a 16-year-old passenger.

All three incidence are, of course, terrible. However, in the two assault cases, the information collected by ridesharing companies meant the perpetrators were quickly caught.

In the Miami case, police were able to subpoena Lyft for information on the driver after the victim reported the assault. In the Orange County case, the family member who had ordered the Uber ride for the underage victim was able to use the app's tracking feature to find her and her assailant after she did not return home on time.

In the story reported by NBC, Uber proved particularly unhelpful, but that was, ironically enough, a byproduct of the company not allowing minors to use its app.

When the 16-year-old in question tried to report her exhibitionist driver to Uber, her account was deactivated because she was under 18, making it more difficult for her to give identifying information about him to law enforcement. (Uber also declined to give the driver's information to law enforcement without a subpoena, which police were, according to NBC's telling, unable to get because the underlying crime was only a misdemeanor.)

An exhaustive CNN review of assaults by rideshare drivers turned up 103 cases that've occurred in the last four years, and by far, the most likely people to get assaulted by their driver were not children, but adults, usually intoxicated women travelling alone.

There also seems to be little evidence that more extensive background checks—beyond the type that both companies already perform—would reduce the incidences of assault.

A 2016 story from the Associated Press was unable to say one way or another if passengers were more likely to be assaulted by rideshare drivers or traditional cabbies. A Cato Institute study the year before found that Uber and Lyft's requirements for drivers were more strict than those governing taxis and other for-hire vehicles.

It's important to recognize too that while there are risks for minors taking Uber and Lyft—which is against the companies' terms of service—there are also risks to finding a way to prohibit youths from these services.

Rideshare companies can provide a sober ride home for under-18s who are too drunk to drive and too embarrassed to call mom or dad. It could also help children of single parents (or overworked couples) get where they need to go before and after school, or to and from part-time jobs.

Indeed, there's already budding demand for these services, as evidenced by smaller, kid-focused ridesharing services like Zum and Sheprd.

It's natural for parents to be concerned about the dangers of teenagers and younger children getting rides from complete strangers. That said, there is little evidence that this means of transportation is especially dangerous to minors.

Photo Credit: Jonathan Weiss/Dreamstime.com

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Bronze Khopesh||

    Ridesharing? More like....ridescaring!

  • Bronze Khopesh||

    I keep ordering my mother-in-law rides on Uber and Lyft yet she always returns unscathed. I feel I'm being cheated.

  • Microaggressor||

    In February, D.C.'s FOX5 did a segment featuring a 12-year old who was shuttled from one parent's house to another alone, via Uber.

    Those monsters. Someone call Chris Hansen to put a stop to this blatant child predation.

  • Microaggressor||

    You're getting into a stranger from the internet's car.

    Completely different than getting into a stranger from the street's car with a yellow thing on top. This magical totem wards off all sexual impulses.

  • Trainer||

    I had a cab driver in Houston offer to buy my young girls one night and he wasn't joking. Lyft and Uber have brought more safety and accountability to riders.

  • GlenchristLaw||

    It's not the kids who should be in a panic; it's the drivers.

    As anyone who works professionally with children (e.g., teachers) knows: You never, NEVER, allow yourself to be alone with a minor except in a room with windows through which other adults can see you at all times.

    It is inevitable that a schmuck rideshare driver (a redundant expression, incidentally) gets hit with a frivolous "he touched me" prosecution.

  • Bronze Khopesh||

    A lot of drivers have cameras facing into the car. I know I would.

  • Unicorn Abattoir||

    Not a bad idea. Livestream the trips on youtube, get a few witnesses.

  • Bronze Khopesh||

    In some areas you can't broadcast a person without their consent. There was just a such a thing lately and there was an upsetness among people that happened.

    But that doesn't mean you can't record and keep the footage* handy in case you're accused of something.


    *Footage? Ha, like that's even relevant anymore in the digital age.

  • Remember to keep it all polit||

    Meterage, if you will, unless some fainting heart taxi driver thinks that is cultural appropriation.

  • sharmota4zeb||

    Yep. That's standard operating procedure in the education industry.

  • Longtobefree||

    Good point: MUCH better that they walk alone down the cities mean streets.

  • BestUsedCarSales||

    "They can't do full psych evals on these drivers. You really are taking a risk. You're getting into a stranger from the internet's car."

    I had to read that a few times, for whatever reason my kept interpreting it as "From the internet's car, you are getting into a stranger."

  • Unicorn Abattoir||

    I was going to say, if they do full psych evals, I've known more than a few cabbies that slipped through the cracks.

  • Rossami||

    Uber and Lyft are replacing taxis.
    Taxi drivers had no psych evals, no fingerprinting and no background checks.
    Yet somehow, millions of minors successfully road in taxis (and before that, in hansens, buggies and horse-drawn hacks) without creating a media frenzy.

  • benracer1||

    We LOVE UBER for the kids, started UBERING in 9th grade. Saved many a day for us...concert call times, ride to school, ride from school, social events, after school events. AND...we have yet to have a kid spend more per month on UBER than we would spend per month to add teenagers to our insurance.

  • sharmota4zeb||

    Times have changed, when I was in elementary school, I flew from New York City to Chicago unaccompanied to visit a classmate who had moved. About 30 years later, my mom freaks out every time I call her from the UK to tell her I'm on my way to Romania again. Oh, and don't get me started on that certain someone in Romania. Now he doesn't want to communicate with me, just because I've started carbon copying Detective Nase from Homeland Security whenever I email him those vlogs.

  • Trollificus||

    People can't do risk assessment anymore. Wonder if Uber is 1/1,000th as dangerous as the hitch-hiking we used to do, or 1/10,000.

    Also noted: these fucking media outlets seem to have a well-practiced gift for side-door misrepresentation of facts and situations.

  • totc||

    As an Uber driver, I dislike driving a child who does not have an accompanying parent. I have to take off my shoes to count the number of times they wish to stuff more people than I have seatbelts for in my car. In addition, I was pinged at approx. 1:30 am to take a pair of 14 year old girls to a drugstore. No way in hell is this 48 year old single male driving two 14 year old girls anywhere. Uber & Lyft should work to change their policies.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online