MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

Friday Funnies: Gorsuch Filibuster

Chip Bok - Creators SyndicateChip Bok - Creators Syndicate

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Will4Freedom||

    Come on, Fist. Where are you when we need you?

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    I just can't take another furries cartoon.

  • Libertarian||

    That's not gas. "Filibuster" is the name of Schumer's breeding stallion that he keeps upstate.

  • Quo Usque Tandem||

    Funny. Thank you, I will use this.

  • Jerryskids||

    Why is LBJ trying to light a fire under a mule?

  • JWatts||

    "Every man has a right to a Saturday night bath." LBJ

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    If you're not going to label him, at least give the readers a clue with an accurate depiction of Schumer's tits.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    He's Senate Minority Leader.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Because he would be smart enough to know not to try to light matches while standing over a can of highly flammable bukake.

  • Libertarian||

    If only more democrats were as honorable as tibetan monks.

  • Unemployed Armenian Tranny||

    I say reinstate the fillibuster if it will only ever take the form of self-immolation.

    You set your self on fire, I'll give you that one! Bravo, Sir/Madame.

  • Will4Freedom||

    Isn't getting rid of the filibuster GOOD for Democrats? They will use it for everything from this point forward.

    I would have drawn the repugs standing around the "nuke" button with puzzled looks on their faces and the donkeys on the side lines wringing their hands (hooves?) saying "do it... press it... go ahead... you know you want to".

  • loveconstitution1789||

    Any politician who wants a Nanny-State would want the filibuster removed to make it easier to pass laws and big spending. So Democrats are probably fine with removing the 60 vote threshold.

    The GOP can use this opportunity to keep Democrats from stopping good appointments and cutting the government budget. Then in 2020, use a majority vote to add the 60 vote threshold back for all Senate business and require a 100 Senator vote to remove it.

  • Will4Freedom||

    It's BOK.
    It's BOK.
    It's BOK.
    I don't know... ask BOK!.

  • Will4Freedom||

    "Nobody Gets In to See the Great Bok. Not Nobody. Not No How"

  • Social Darwinist||

    So the Democrats are so upset over the rules changes that their ass is on fire?

  • Will4Freedom||

    I see what you did there.... nice!

  • trudybeauty||

    Gee. If one filibuster by a Democrat is seen as lighting a match to burn up its party, then the 500+ filibusters by the republicans during Obama's term amount the the firebombing of Dresden.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online