Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

With or Without Legalization, Sports Betting is Here to Stay

U.S. politicians prevented the development of a legal market for sports betting, driving eager gamblers to underground bookies.

Fanatic Studio/agefotostock/NewscomFanatic Studio/agefotostock/NewscomThe U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a federal law forcing most states to ban sports betting is unconstitutional. The decision didn't, strictly speaking, legalize sports betting—it just got the federal government out of the states' various ways so they could decide policy on their own terms.

It's still not clear that they'll get to do that, given that Lord High Scold Orrin Hatch, in his role as a senator from Utah and co-author of the legislation that was just kneecapped, plans to introduce a new bill intended to "to help protect honesty and principle in the athletic arena" and, not incidentally, choke off sports-related games of chance.

While it should go without saying, I'll say it anyway: that's a stupid idea. The federal law and related state and local statutes have never eradicated the thrills and risks of games of chance; they've only made them illegal, and driven a thriving industry and its customers underground.

In the ruling, Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority: "As the Tenth Amendment confirms, all legislative power not conferred on Congress by the Constitution is reserved for the States. Absent from the list of conferred powers is the power to issue direct orders to the governments of the States." And the Professional and Amateur Sports Protections Act (PASPA) of 1992's "provision prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violates the anticommandeering rule."

That's a sound win for the Constitution and for state autonomy, if not quite for individual rights. The ultimate legality of sports gambling now rests on the hands of state legislators who may or may not have more respect for freedom of choice and the simple reality of the world around them than their federal counterparts. Whatever they decide, though, gambling will continue with or without official approval, just as it has for…well…forever.

My grandfather, Salvatore "Chips" Tuccille was a professional gambler, as my father detailed in his memoir, Heretic. One of my father's earliest memories was of the paddy wagon passing by on East Tremont Avenue in the Bronx, and his "father, petty gambler and carouser now known throughout the neighborhood as Chips, staring bug-eyed at neighborhood gawkers through the iron bars in back…The cops had raided the waterfront and hauled in Chips and his fellow riffraff, hustlers and suckers alike."

But neither that bust nor another really deterred him; his biggest scores came later, on the troop ships to and from Europe during World War II. And my grandfather was no outlier, as illegal gambling goes.

PASPA "restricts all but a handful of states from legalizing sports gambling," Eric Meer wrote in 2011 in the UNLV Gaming Law Journal. "This has allowed a thriving shadow economy of mob-associated bookies and offshore websites to operate with virtual impunity." Meer documents the history of federal efforts to restrict gambling, concluding that "Congress can try to prohibit or discourage sports gambling, but underground bookmakers will continue to serve the public's demand."

Just how popular is sports gambling, even with Orrin Hatch and his buddies putting on their frowny faces at every mention of the activity? "Estimates of the scope of illegal sports betting in the United States range anywhere from $80 billion to $380 billion annually," concluded a 1999 report commissioned by Congress, "making sports betting the most widespread and popular form of gambling in America."

Yeah, that was almost 20 years ago, before widespread broadband Internet provided easy access to off-shore operations. I wouldn't bet on the industry having shrunk since then.

March Madness alone accounts for about $12.5 billion annually in illegal betting, Bloomberg guesstimated in 2015. But Jay L. Zagorsky, an economist at Ohio State University, sniffs at such figures. He thinks the total illegal sports betting industry "only" accounts for about $67 billion in business every year.

On occasion, the U.S. has flexed its muscles against gambling operations based overseas, such as with the 2006 arrest of the unfortunate David Carruthers, CEO of BetonSports, while he was changing planes in Dallas during a flight between London and Costa Rica. Carruthers was arrested in transit because the U.S. had no jurisdiction over him where he and his company were based and operating perfectly legally under different laws than the sort favored by Hatch.

That the arrest was more for public-relations purposes than for actual effect is clear from Meer's subsequent paper documenting PASPA's failure and from the Bloomberg and Zagorsky estimates of the money changing hands in defiance of the law. Perhaps such grandstanding deterred a few aboveboard companies from offering betting services online to American customers, but that left the industry open to the upscale heirs of the likes of my grandfather.

"A more direct affront to state sovereignty is not easy to imagine," Justice Alito continued his scathing critique of PASPA on his way to driving a judicial spike through its heart. He could have added, though it wasn't his writ to do so, that it was an equal blow to the right of individuals to make their own choices, and to sheer common sense, since a long history tells us that banning markets for popular goods and services just drives them underground.

"Hopefully, Congress or the federal courts will recognize that PASPA (1) has failed to accomplish what it set out to do, (2) continues to support a thriving shadow economy of mob-associated bookies and offshore websites, (3) unfairly restricts the sovereignty and economic freedom of the states, and (4) makes detecting possible athlete and referee bribery more difficult," Meer concluded in his 2011 article. "PASPA is a bad bet that is no longer worth gambling on."

Honestly, PASPA was always a sucker's bet. Unfortunately, politicians represent a ready supply of suckers for just such legislative scams.

Photo Credit: Fanatic Studio/agefotostock/Newscom

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Don't look at me.||

    What's this guy talk about? People's don't do things that are illegal. Like drugs or shooting each other in Chicago. If you pass a law, problems is solved.

  • Mr Smeeth||

    And the leagues trying to get vig off it now, wtf is that garbage.

  • Rubbish!||

    Hatch is a 6 1/2 point underdog on his new bill. Over/under is 55 senators against, but only after intense lobbying efforts shake major cash from both sides.

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

  • Don't look at me.||

    9-0 doesn't sound divided.
    Where did they dig up 9 brain dead idiots?

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

    We voted for them. Repeatedly.

  • Inigo Montoya||

    Tax creating jobs because...??? They used to think adding taxes discouraged doing something (see cigarette taxes), but now that doesn't apply, I guess. Or, do they want to discourage jobs because it might make jobless folks feel bad to see others heading off to work in the morning?

    There's a cartoon strip I saw shared on some libertarian-themed FB group once that points out that the War on Drugs increased drug use and the War on Terror created more terrorists, so why can't the government have a War on Jobs and a War on Income?

    It sounds like the Seattle government saw that cartoon and took it seriously!

  • Cynical Asshole||

    Waive good-bye to Amazon then. Boeing and Microsoft probably aren't far behind.

  • Rhywun||

    I don't think Microsoft is in Seattle. Bellevue?

  • Cynical Asshole||

    Maybe not. And I think Boeing is technically in Everett. I'm assuming Seattle's idiocy will spread, like a virus though.

  • BestUsedCarSales||

    Microsoft is in Redmond. They have some buildings in Seattle and Bellevue, and really all over. Even Bothell and stuff has them.

    Expedia is in Bellevue, but was planning on relocating to Seattle. Let's see if that continues.

    Boeing is up in Everett now I think.

  • BestUsedCarSales||

    At least I can take solace in the fact that the homeless problem is now fixed.

  • Cynical Asshole||

    Surely you're not trying to imply that laws aren't magical things that instantly stop any and all prohibited activity? /sarc

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

    That anecdote he recalls @47:35 is quite telling.

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

    oops, wrong thread.

  • CE||

    Sports betting isn't the biggest form of gambling in the US -- the stock market is. And it's a better bet too, since even if you don't know what you are doing you are likely to make 5 to 10 percent a year, versus losing 5 to 10 percent on sports betting even if you are right half the time.

  • dimitri303||

    Hi there i scrolled through joker stash(world leading darkweb forum) i found this ad and tested; see below
    Hacker for hire, get your malware and bots, python hacks, website hacks, social media account hack, university grade upgrade, cellphone hack, burner number(no trace location), background checks, links removal, money laundering, bitcoin flips, western union hack, cyber security services, bitcoin wallet hacks, escort services(top notch models[arabs included]), darkweb services and many more: contact CAPT_PAGE(a)TUTANOTA,COM

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online