Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

Trump's Troubling Attorney General Pick

When Jeff Sessions, Donald Trump's choice for attorney general, was nominated as a federal judge in 1986, one comment that got him into trouble was a joke about the Ku Klux Klan. A federal prosecutor testified that Sessions, when he was the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Alabama, had said he thought the KKK "was OK until I found out they smoked pot."

In light of the Alabama senator's longtime obsession with the evils of marijuana, the anecdote reads like a joke about him. After all, this is the same man who thinks "good people don't smoke marijuana" and who was outraged when President Barack Obama conceded that cannabis is less dangerous than alcohol. Sessions' retrograde opinions about marijuana cast doubt on Donald Trump's commitment to respect state laws allowing production, distribution, and consumption of the drug.

Trump has said he supports medical marijuana but has concerns about broader legalization, a policy he nevertheless thinks states should be free to adopt. "I really believe you should leave it up to the states," he said at a rally in 2015. "I think that should be a state issue, state by state."

Sessions, an old-fashioned drug warrior who pines for the days when Nancy Reagan's Just Say No campaign helped "create a hostility to drug use," seems to disagree. During a 2009 Senate hearing, he complained that "Attorney General [Eric] Holder has said federal authorities will no longer raid medical marijuana facilities in California." At a hearing last April, he declared that "marijuana is not the kind of thing that ought to be legalized," saying "the Department of Justice needs to be clear."

Every state-licensed marijuana business remains a criminal enterprise under federal law, subjecting its owners to the risk of prosecution and forfeiture. An anti-pot crusader at the helm of the Justice Department could make that risk salient by going after growers, manufacturers, and retailers, or just by threatening to do so.

Sessions also could challenge state marijuana laws in federal court, although he might not like the result. While judges might agree that state regulation of marijuana suppliers conflicts with federal law, the Justice Department cannot force states to recriminalize what those businesses do.

Such federal interference would be inconsistent with public opinion as well as Trump's promises. Recent polls indicate that most Americans think pot should be legal, although most Republicans continue to oppose legalization. But even among Republicans, most—70 percent, according to a CBS News poll conducted last April—think the feds should not try to override state decisions in this area.

Photo Credit: CSPAN screenshot

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Diane Merriam||

    The irony is that fascism and socialism are actually very similar. The only real difference is that fascism maintains the facade of private property while still having almost the same amount of control over it. But hey, Mussolini did make the trains run on time and that's all that's important to a lot of people.

  • Mithrandir||

    I agree with you, but this is like the 7th article I've seen in the last few weeks about the Trump Administration's potential marijuana policies.

    Look, I despise Sessions as much as the next Libertarian, but shouldn't we cease publishing articles about this until there's, you know, actually some new information on the topic?

  • Hicks||

    No, let's panic now and avoid the rush.
    People like Steve Miller ( The president will not be questioned) and Jeff Sessions seem like Westworld rejects, bound to fail badly.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online