Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Election 2026

From Tariffs to $4.15 Gas: How Republicans Earned Their Midterm Shellacking

You cannot spend years governing this way—defying voters' clear directive to lower prices—and then expect the fear of what Democrats might do to spare your party from accountability.

Veronique de Rugy | 11.12.2026 12:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
a patriotic elephant with a ball and chain on its legs | Stephen Coburn/Renzzo/Dreamstime/Destina/Newscom
(Stephen Coburn/Renzzo/Dreamstime/Destina/Newscom)

After the shellacking Republicans just took in the midterm elections, a common refrain among conservatives is that we should all be terrified of what comes next. Whether you get your commentary from X, Instagram, or friends on Facebook, you may have heard fear that the Democrats will vastly expand the size and scope of government, usher in socialism, or destroy Western civilization.

There is no doubt that a lot of bad, big-government policies are in store. But if the prospect of Democrats returning to power is so terrifying, why on earth did Republicans elect a president and vice president as controversial as Donald Trump and J.D. Vance? Why did they support so many policies in clear opposition to the promotion of a free and virtuous society? Did they think a majority of voters would enjoy the result?

You cannot spend years governing this way, adopting tariffs and other policies that raise the cost of living, defying a clear directive to lower prices from voters in the previous election, and then expect the fear of what Democrats might do to spare your party from accountability.

Start with the moment Trump's 2024 voters began drifting away: April 2, 2025. On "Liberation Day," the president displayed a chart in the White House Rose Garden featuring tariff rates calculated with laughably incompetent mathematics. He then proceeded to raise taxes on nearly everything we buy from abroad, including from allies and uninhabited islands.

It's true that voters were told there would be tariffs. In fact, they were sold the theory that tariffs could solve every problem. What they got was a president who taxed importers at his whim based on how he felt on any given day. Americans quickly realized they were the ones footing the bill, not foreigners.

Everything was more expensive, from steel to food to luxury products and basic necessities. When a conservative Supreme Court ruled last February that Trump's tariffs were not authorized by the statute he relied on, the president quickly doubled down by turning to another faulty statute.

Meanwhile, the failed and chaotic tenure of the Department of Government Efficiency alongside a refusal to reform entitlement spending, additional war spending, damaging tax carveouts for tips and overtime, and fresh giveaways to seniors left us with a $2 trillion deficit. It also fed inflation that no amount of blame directed at former Fed Chairman Jerome Powell could hide.

Immigration policy followed the same pattern. The administration did, in some respects, close the border, which many Americans supported. But after that, it decided the job wasn't complete without raiding farms, meatpacking facilities, building sites, and hotels. Beyond the negative effects for workers and employers, shocking images of draconian raids added to the political damage.

Farmers got the worst of it: In 2025, soybean exports to China fell 76 percent, beef by 69 percent, and cotton by 85 percent. In December, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced a $12 billion bailout for farmers hurt by "unfair market disruptions." It was indeed unfair, but that's because farmers were repeatedly punched in the face by U.S. trade policies that destroyed their export markets. Now the unfairness extends to everyday Americans taxed to compensate the farmers.

Then came the war in Iran. Gasoline went from $2.98 a gallon in February to $4.15 on Election Day. Diesel, which rides along in the price of everything trucks deliver, hit $6.28, 65 percent above its prewar level. Moody's puts the Iran bill at roughly $2,000 per household once mortgage rates, airfares, and heating oil are counted.

Farmers took a second hit because one-third of the world's traded urea, a product heavily used in agriculture, moves through the Strait of Hormuz. The price of nitrogen fertilizer roughly doubled in a matter of weeks.

Not everyone suffered, of course. Lobbyists and cronies thrived. When a tax on their inputs can be raised or waived by one erratic man, firms slow hiring and investing and plead for exemptions. In 2025, the number of registered clients lobbying on tariffs rose by 218 percent. Tech companies that pledged big domestic investments were rewarded with exemptions. Unsurprisingly, the artificial intelligence industry did well. The administration also took an equity stake in 41 companies, many of which have connections to members' friends and family.

Vance now implies that the electoral drubbing happened only because of the war. That's convenient. If the war explains everything, nobody has to ask about the failing populist promise that moving away from free-market policies will make America great again, or about how such a top-down system feeds corruption. Both are trademark policies of a MAGA movement that will presumably soon be led by Vance himself.

So yes, fear the Democrats. I certainly do. They'll keep most of the tariffs, expand industrial policy, cheer the equity stakes, and run even bigger budget deficits—or worse. That fear should have mattered before so many Republicans chose to tolerate intolerable MAGA policies and behaviors.

COPYRIGHT 2026 CREATORS.COM

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Property Owners in Natural Gas Pipeline Case

Veronique de Rugy is a contributing editor at Reason. She is a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

Election 2026MAGARepublican PartyDemocratic PartyWarIranTariffsImmigrationGasolineFarmingDonald TrumpJ.D. VanceTrump AdministrationCampaigns/ElectionsCongressSenatePolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (0)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

From Tariffs to $4.15 Gas: How Republicans Earned Their Midterm Shellacking

Veronique de Rugy | 11.12.2026 12:10 PM

Supreme Court Seems Skeptical of Property Owners in Natural Gas Pipeline Case

Damon Root | 11.12.2026 11:20 AM

Mamdani Signs a Law Letting Housing Nonprofits Bid First on Distressed Buildings 

Meagan O'Rourke | 11.12.2026 10:51 AM

The Media Environment Has Changed. Maybe That's All Right.

Ryan Curtis | 11.12.2026 10:25 AM

The Nvidia Affairs

Liz Wolfe | 11.12.2026 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason

The All-Argentina Issue is Here

New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.

Subscribe & Start Reading Learn More