Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

TikTok

TikTok's $100 Million Settlement With Alabama Is No Win for the Public

TikTok must implement several new "safety" features, including time limits for kids and strict age-verification measures.

Meagan O'Rourke | 9.29.2026 2:36 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
An outline of the state of Alabama filled in with U.S. dollars against an orange background, a smartphone with the TikTok logo | Allexxandar/Bigtunaonline/Olivier Le Queinec/Dreamstime
(Allexxandar/Bigtunaonline/Olivier Le Queinec/Dreamstime)

TikTok and the state of Alabama were supposed to face off in court on Monday, but a $100 million settlement stopped the case from going to trial. 

On Friday, TikTok agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall alleging the platform knowingly damaged children's mental health. The settlement requires TikTok to implement several features, including restrictions on nighttime access for children, a default nonpersonalized feed for teens, stronger parental controls, a two-hour daily time limit for children, and "robust age assurance measures to effectively verify the age of young users." TikTok could also owe Alabama an additional $183.8 million if other states reach qualifying settlements with the company, reports the Associated Press.

Alabama's office of the attorney general celebrated the settlement, calling it "the latest victory in Attorney General Marshall's efforts to hold technology companies and social media platforms accountable for putting Alabama consumers, particularly children, at risk." Last month, the office noted, Meta settled with Alabama for $117 million as part of a $17.1 billion multistate lawsuit over similar claims that social media platforms are harming children.

Social media platforms are not the only targets of Alabama's online safety crusade. The video game company Roblox reached a $12.2 million settlement with the state in April over online safety concerns. The settlement terms require all Roblox users to "undergo age verification to ensure children have access only to age-appropriate content on the platform." According to the state, Roblox said it would rely on facial recognition technology and government-issued IDs to verify users' ages.

Strict age-verification requirements raise serious privacy concerns. Implementing Roblox's ID checks would mean that all users would be subject to these age-verification measures, making online anonymity extremely difficult. Whatever such measures TikTok enforces in Alabama would presumably apply to all users to distinguish adults from children.

Meanwhile, creative and tech-savvy users often work around these restrictions or flee to less regulated realms of the internet. In Australia, a social media ban for children under 16 has proven largely ineffective, as many young children have not been asked to verify their ages. Among those who encounter age gating online, many circumvent the ban by having older friends set up accounts on their behalf, gaming the age assurance system, and, in some cases, using VPNs.

As This American Life host Ira Glass reported last week, users who were too young to be on social media were conversing in the comments section of an NPR show on Spotify. Why? Because it was a place without many comments, said one young user. While the NPR comments section is not exactly the online Wild West, the story shows that young people can be extremely creative in finding less regulated places to meet online. Techdirt's Mike Masnick pointed out last year that kids banned from social media at school have even used Google Docs as a makeshift group chat.

"Maybe Australia will ban kids from Spotify comments next. Then Google Docs. Then whatever random corner of the internet kids discover after that," he wrote. "We can keep playing [whack-a-mole] until we've legislated away every possible space where teenagers might talk to each other without adult supervision." Still, he warned, kids always find ways around bans, so it is best to teach kids how to navigate online spaces safely.

At best, government-imposed social media restrictions are acts of political theater; users are often savvy enough to work around them. At worst, they're chilling censorship orders. If more of these safety measures are enforced, entire swaths of the internet could become age-gated. Officials may feel that they are protecting children in their states by securing settlements with social media companies, but they're making the internet less free for adults and pushing kids to less visible realms of the web.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Whatever Happened to Trump's Housing Affordability Executive Order?

Meagan O'Rourke is an associate editor at Reason.

TikTokCensorshipSocial MediaAlabamaParentingTechnology
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (2)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. BYODB   11 minutes ago

    Not sure how I feel about this, but it does beg the question of why TikTok settled rather than have this heard in court.

    That might be a bit of victim blaming, perhaps the cost/benefit wasn't there for them, but it's just as possible that discovery would reveal some things they'd rather not have revealed.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   8 minutes ago

      It’s protection money.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

TikTok's $100 Million Settlement With Alabama Is No Win for the Public

Meagan O'Rourke | 9.29.2026 2:36 PM

Whatever Happened to Trump's Housing Affordability Executive Order?

Christian Britschgi | 9.29.2026 2:05 PM

Seattle's 'Surveillance Pricing' Ban Is a Solution Searching for a Problem

Josh Pauzé | 9.29.2026 1:46 PM

AI Facial Recognition Didn't Put This Tennessee Grandma in Jail for 6 Months. Bad Policing Did.

Autumn Billings | 9.29.2026 1:27 PM

The Protect College Sports Act Passed the Senate. It Faces a Tougher Road in the House—and in the Courts.

Jason Russell | 9.29.2026 11:55 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason