Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

9/11

In Memoriam

Plus: Rest in peace Andrew Wimsatt, Vance ascendant, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 9.11.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
World Trade Center after 9/11 plane impact | Robert J. Fisch/Wikimedia Commons/U.S. National Archives
(Robert J. Fisch/Wikimedia Commons/U.S. National Archives)

Scenes from New York: Twenty-five years ago today, Islamic extremist terrorists hijacked planes headed for Los Angeles and San Francisco from Boston, Newark, and Dulles and flew them into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, killing thousands in one fell swoop. A fourth plane was headed for an unspecified location, likely in Washington, D.C., but the terrorists were overtaken by passengers who crashed the plane into a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, so the hijackers could do no further damage.

Over the years, many thousands of people died from various conditions resulting from the toxic dust at Ground Zero, including first responders. And many stories have emerged of the many heroes who sacrificed themselves to save others. Here's some of the best reading about that day and its impact decades later:

"Fighting to Live as the Towers Died" from The New York Times.

A full accounting of the morning—at the World Trade Center, at the Pentagon, and in Shanksville—from The Washington Post.

Pictures of lower Manhattan from 25 years ago, and today, from The New York Times.

Maybe a city forgets, from Vital City.

A tribute to Mychal Judge, FDNY chaplain, from The Irish Times:

Judge was a man who encompassed a number of seeming contradictions. He was not a typical priest. From 1971 to 1978, he struggled with alcoholism, battling his addiction with the help of Alcoholics Anonymous. He was gay, a fact known only by a number of his closer friends. Judge synthesised his experiences in order to access a spiritual empathy that allowed him to reach out to the poor and the dispossessed when they needed it most.

He was a peacemaker. In 1986, when Detective Steven McDonald was shot in Central Park by a youth and left paralysed, Judge prayed with the victim and later brought about a reconciliation between the two. Judge and Detective McDonald became lifelong friends and visited a number of communities going through processes of reconciliation, including Northern Ireland and Sarajevo.

The tale of Rick Rescorla, 9/11 hero: "There are certain men born in this world, and they're supposed to die setting an example for the rest of the weak bastards we're surrounded with."

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The horrors of that day also shaped our politics for many years to come: "The political response to 9/11 was nearly instantaneous and unidirectional, always pointing to more power and money for the state, at whatever level deemed necessary," writes Nick Gillespie:

As Ohio State political scientist John Mueller reminded people in the years following the 9/11 attacks, catastrophic events and social panics routinely give rise to laws and policies that long outlive the specific moments that inspire them. He noted that the Red Scare of the postwar era gave rise to loyalty oaths, incursions on civil liberties, and other policies that persisted for years or even decades after anyone seriously feared communist subversion. After 9/11, he wrote, the issue wasn't simply about government surveillance, but spending patterns on things like the new Department of Homeland Security that could be locked in. Osama bin Laden had declared in 2004 that his goal was 'bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy' by spending large amounts on all manner of activities and services dubiously related to safety. …

If eternal funding for, say, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) seems locked in despite no clear evidence of its efficacy, it's also true that both politicians and voters remain happy to keep on believing that trading freedom for safety is a good idea. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that, compared to 2013, more Americans fear domestic terrorism (33 percent) than foreign terrorism (20 percent). When it comes to wars fought in the name of ending or suppressing terrorism, just 21 percent agree Afghanistan and Iraq were worth it, and just 25 percent think that Iran is worth it. Yet two-thirds of respondents agree that 'airport security disruptions are worth it because they make flying safer' and prefer government agencies to private providers.

"As the events of the following years unfurled—the toppling of the Taliban, the invasion of Iraq, the internments at Guantánamo Bay, the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act, and so on—it became tempting to blame it all on that singular day of pain and horror," writes Emma Ashford for Reason (in "9/11 Turbocharged America's Worst Foreign Policy Impulses—but Didn't Change Its Direction"). "But as we approach the 25th anniversary of the attacks, it's important to understand the limits of that story. The events of 9/11 undoubtedly had a major impact on foreign policy. Yet this impact was less a change of direction and more an intensification of already existing trends. The 9/11 attacks would create a permissive political and psychological environment for a particular foreign policy vision, but it did not set America on the path to liberal interventionism and forever war all by itself. For that, we must look back into the 1990s."

For more on the long political shadow of 9/11, check out the August/September issue of Reason. And may God rest the souls of those who perished.


QUICK HITS

  • Rest in peace, Andrew Wimsatt: He was a superfan of Reason and The Fifth Column, as well as Greg Gutfeld and Kat Timpf, and a committed archivist, clipping people's media appearances (including mine) and now-defunct shows (Red Eye) to make sure they survived. He was a really sweet guy, but the thing I perhaps most admired about him was how well he took care of his mom. It feels gruesome to give details about his killing, but it's also the truth: Wimsatt was brutally stabbed to death—seemingly by a stranger—in broad daylight in Round Rock, Texas, in a park after visiting his mom at her nursing home on Labor Day. Benedict Ogbodiegwu Jr. has been charged with Wimsatt's murder. "Jail records show Ogbodiegwu was arrested twice earlier this year," reports KXAN. "He was arrested in January on a theft charge. In June, he was arrested and charged with failing to identify or providing false identification information." Many of us are gutted by such a gentle guy being met with such cruelty. Join me in praying for his family and for justice to be served. Linking a few remembrances from around the internet to give you a sense of who he was.
  • "On the convention stage Thursday night, as [Vice President J.D.] Vance gave the keynote address, the vice president basked in the kind of affection and praise from the crowd usually reserved only for Trump," reports The Washington Post. "Audience members broke into roaring cheers of 'JD!' as he walked onstage. Midway through his speech, the crowd erupted into a chant of '48,' a reference to the fact that Vance would be the 48th president if he were elected in 2028. Vance smiled at the lectern, taking it in. Similar friendly outbursts continued throughout his speech, in which he talked about the kind of country he wanted to raise his children in. He also appealed for Republican unity, while attacking Democrats as the 'party of hatred.'"
  • "Consumer prices overall have risen more than 30 percent since the beginning of 2019," reports The New York Times in an interactive feature that explores the last 15 years of prices. "That's two and a half times as much as they went up from 2012 to 2019."
  • CPI report:

BREAKING: August CPI inflation comes in at 3.4%, in-line with expectations of 3.4%

Core CPI inflation falls to 2.4%, also in-line with expectations of 2.4%.

Month-over-month CPI inflation rose +0.4%, the biggest increase since May 2026.

Treasury yields are rising on the news.

— The Kobeissi Letter (@KobeissiLetter) September 11, 2026

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Politicians See Opportunity in Data Center Panic

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

9/11War on TerrorTerrorismAl QaedaOsama bin LadenWarNew York CityPolicyPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (198)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Twenty-five years ago today, Islamic extremist terrorists...

    We kinda forgot.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Who's "we"?

      1. Eeyore   2 months ago

        Minnesota.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      I had forgot today was the day, but I just came in from lowering my flag to half-staff.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Al Sharpton forgot...

      https://x.com/TheRevAl/status/2097373049074897079

      There are more than one million Muslim New Yorkers. They are just as much a part of the fabric of this city as anyone else.

      Anyone demanding that the Mayor not attend a day of solemn remembrance because of his faith is motivated by anti-Muslim bigotry.

      September 11th is a day of remembrance and unity. It’s time we act accordingly.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Some people did some things.

        1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

          It was unpleasant.

      2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        What exactly was Mamdani's role in 9/11 again?

        1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          Moral support for the terrorists.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            If you would just voluntarily submit to Islam, they wouldn't be forced to kill you.

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Because he's Muslim? Because he's from Uganda? Because he's a socialist? What exactly is his 'moral support' here?

        2. MT-Man   2 months ago

          You're stupid and classless

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            By pointing out that Mamdani had nothing to do with 9/11 even though a big faction of MAGA is acting as if he was the one flying the planes himself?

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              What's interesting in this comment is comparing his attacks on the right to his defenses of the left. When discussing the right he makes assertions no one has made, blithely slandering those he hates. But when anyone else criticizes the left (certainly Jeffey would never criticize the left even though he pretends to be a libertarian) he transforms into a hairsplitting lawyer.

              He thinks he's clever but even a cursory review shows he's a propagandist.

              1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

                Brings

              2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                “….he transforms into a hairsplitting lawyer.”

                No one does *selective nuance* quite like Mr. “what if he ‘just’ jacked off on the underage gang rape victim and (claimed) he felt bad about it after he got caught? Hmmmm?”

        3. Marshal   2 months ago

          Mamdani believes America deserved 9/11. People who don't believe America deserved 9/11 do not ally themselves with people who do.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            Zohran Mamdani says that the real victim of 9/11 was his aunt because she was too afraid to ride the subway in her hijab.

        4. damikesc   2 months ago

          Families are not permitted to request non-attendance by a grandstanding politician?

      3. Marshal   2 months ago

        It's perfect that Sharpton calls everyone with different opinions bigots in his call for "unity". He's the perfect Democrat: a race baiting demagogue who literally incited murders who nevertheless claims moral superiority over normals.

  2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    There was nothing extream about it(from a Muslim perspective) . Terrorist attacks against people that disagree with them is standard in Islam. Look at their 1400 year history

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      +1 Literally and figuratively, 3,000 unrelated and innocent lives is just another Tuesday where some people did some things.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Suicidal empathy says differently.

      1. Z Crazy   2 months ago

        To call Islam a religion of peace is liker calling the AR-15 a weapon of peace.

        1. rbike   2 months ago

          Well mine is. Peace of mind, that is.

        2. Zeb   2 months ago

          For the most part it is (the AR-15). It is used in very few crimes and the vast majority of the millions in circulation in the US are used primarily for target shooting.

          1. rbike   2 months ago

            It's really not an AR15 but it shoots the same bullets from similar but not compatible magazines.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Get used to the phrase “President Vance”.

    1. Marshal   2 months ago

      President of the Heritage Foundation maybe.

    2. Nelson   2 months ago

      America can recover from Trump, although it will take years to regain our former glory.

      JD Vince as President would put a knife through America’s soul.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Rest in peace, Andrew Wimsatt...

    I interacted with him a time or two. He seemed nice, like the consummate engineer. He definitely didn't deserve that senseless end.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Benedict Ogbodiegwu Jr. has been charged with Wimsatt's murder. "Jail records show Ogbodiegwu was arrested twice earlier this year," reports KXAN.

      The revolving door continues.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        It seems he was also suing the unemployment office for denying claims. He was pro se, so he had an idiot for a client, but I'm gonna guess maybe no real lawyer wanted to be in on a fraud deal?

        Couldn't find if he is a citizen or not, legal immigrant or not.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          2017: charged with theft, a state jail felony. Dismissed.

          Jan 2026: arrested for theft. Court ordered a competency evaluation, then committed him for restoration in February. The competency hearing set for May 29 was canceled. The theft charge was dismissed April 7.

          May 2026: arrested again, this time for giving police false identification. Dismissed.

          Three cases, three dismissals. Now first-degree murder.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            It seems as though you are just assuming in each of these three cases, he was guilty of the crime for which he was arrested, or at the least, that he was properly arrested for that crime. How do we know that is the case?

            1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

              Your buddy sarc sez that cops only arrest you if you are guilty.

              1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

                When was that?

                1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                  Nyc trump felony case.

                  He even says the jury got it right in the case.

                  sarcasmic 2 years ago
                  Flag Comment
                  Mute User
                  Not necessarily true. Juries make mistakes all the time. In this case they didn't. The mistake was the law itself

            2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

              You are assuming three arrests were all just mistakes by the police. Likely because he's black and all cops are racist.

              Do you think he just woke up one morning and decided to stab a random person to death in a public park, without a history of violence? C'mon jeffy sell it to me.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                I'm not assuming anything about those prior crimes. They may have been all legit. They may not have been. YOU are the one who is apparently assuming that he was guilty of all those crimes, should have been locked away years ago, but wasn't because of... some corrupt justice system? some radical judge who actually wants thieves to roam free?

                Do you think he just woke up one morning and decided to stab a random person to death in a public park, without a history of violence?

                Based on what little we know so far, considering that he was asked to submit to a competency hearing, it seems to me that he might have some mental health issues. If that is the case, then that doesn't mean he is some type of thug criminal lowlife. It could very well mean that yes, he just randomly decided to stab a guy on a park bench, because of his illness.

                So now let's hear your theory. He is some lowlife gangbanger criminal, who was arrested multiple times but let free every time, in TEXAS, because of some DEI judge and corrupt justice system? Is that it?

                1. Marshal   2 months ago

                  Who could be surprised Jeffey would come out of retirement to defend a murderer? Some things are important to him.

                  1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                    True. His only commentary today is defending a stone-cold murderer who killed a genuinely good person, who also had connections to the commentariat.
                    It's jeff's way of celebrating Kirk's murder and 9/11 all in one thread. It's a "fuck you, libertarians/conservatives!" to the rest of us.

                    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      I'm not defending murder. I am demanding that genuine justice be served. I'm pushing back against these knee-jerk idiotic claims that limited information about his prior arrests means that there is something necessarily wrong with 'the system'. You are the one, evidently, who does not want justice, instead wants revenge and retribution.

              2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                ALSO, a properly functioning justice system cannot possibly stop all futurecrime. It can only administer justice according to the facts and the law at the time of any particular crime occurs. Let's just assume for a moment that this guy really was guilty of the crime of theft back in 2017, that he should have been convicted, sentenced and thrown in prison back then. How long of a sentence should he have received for the crime of petty theft? Life in prison? Death penalty? Probably not. So he probably would have served a few years in prison and then let out by now.

      2. Marshal   2 months ago

        Two-tiered policing is not just for Western Europe.

      3. MT-Man   2 months ago

        Hey but the jails are the problem right?

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

      Condolences to his family and friends. Didn't know him from Adam, but sounds like good guy who shouldn't have had his life taken from him. RIP.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    "On the convention stage Thursday night, as [Vice President J.D.] Vance gave the keynote address, the vice president basked in the kind of affection and praise from the crowd usually reserved only for Trump," reports The Washington Post.

    WaPo is signaling to the pajama class on whom to target all their efforts.

  6. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Every DA or judge that dismissed the charges of Andrew's murderer should be arrested for abetting. We have come to the point in history where judges and procecuters are actively looking to destroy america

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      ^this

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Not clear from the article if there were any charges dismissed. The arrests mentioned were for fairly minor things that likely wouldn't involve jail time (though I would like to see more punishment for theft than a lot seem to get). Not clear if he had been arrested for any other violent offenses.

      Edit: I see Bob's comment above, so I guess he did have some charges dismissed. I'll at least say that being a crazy, habitual criminal should not be a mitigating factor.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        We know very little about him prior to this murder. He was arrested twice for theft, but we don't know anything about those charges, whether they were legitimate, what was the magnitude of the theft (was it shoplifting a pack of gum, or something more substantial?). Above it is noted that he was ordered to submit to a competency hearing, which suggests that there may have been a mental health issue. If that is the case, it doesn't necessarily mean that this guy is some THUG CRIMINAL but instead a mentally disturbed guy. There is a lot we don't know.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          Jeff wears a pink shirt printed "Same, Lindsay".

        2. StackOfCoins   2 months ago

          We know he stabbed someone to death. This guy needs to be locked away forever, and the people who cut him loose should have their decisions examined.

        3. damikesc   2 months ago

          "He was arrested twice for theft, but we don't know anything about those charges, whether they were legitimate, what was the magnitude of the theft (was it shoplifting a pack of gum, or something more substantial?)."

          Yes, Texas cops routinely arrest people for stealing a pack of gum. Happens constantly. I am awaiting you to present the examples of it happening to justify your concern.

          I know, because you think he was a far right guy he deserved to be murdered, but you are being sillier than normal.

          "Above it is noted that he was ordered to submit to a competency hearing, which suggests that there may have been a mental health issue."

          ...because criminals have never, ever claimed insanity falsely.

          "If that is the case, it doesn't necessarily mean that this guy is some THUG CRIMINAL but instead a mentally disturbed guy. There is a lot we don't know."

          He murdered a guy for no reason. He should never set a single foot on a single street for the remainder of his useless existence.

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            I have little doubt this guy is insane. But insane doesn't mean not legally and morally accountable/liable. Or shouldn't anyway. In any case, whether he's convicted of murder, or deemed legally insane and unable to stand trial, I definitely agree he should never be out on the street again.

            1. damikesc   2 months ago

              I'd have been on board with an insanity judgment in the Clancy case ... if there was any guarantee she'd never be let out. But such a guarantee is impossible.

              At a certain point, insanity should be a factor to make the crime WORSE.

              "You could not control yourself and you killed a guy? Well, why should we ever trust you to not do so again?"

              Also, if you want fun --- look at the history of the temporary insanity defense.

              1. Zeb   2 months ago

                Yeah, I think insanity defense has a place. But only for people so incapacitated that they can't effectively participate in their defense.

      2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        He was also arrested for theft, committed for competency evaluation in Feb, and released in March, case dismissed in april

  7. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Making a dent in $40B/year Chinese fraud rings.

    https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2026/09/scam-center-strike-force-conducts-seizures-chinese-run-illicit-scammer

    U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro, together with major federal law enforcement and interagency partners, announced actions taken by the Department of Justice’s Scam Center Strike Force to secure America against Southeast Asian cryptocurrency-related fraud and scams. The Strike Force and the Department of the Treasury took coordinated actions against Xinbi Guarantee (“Xinbi”), an illicit marketplace for scam services, and the Strike Force deployed to Madagascar to assist in the taking down of 13 Chinese-run scam compounds. Approximately $52 million of cryptocurrency involved in scam money laundering was restrained in one day, bringing the total restrained by the Scam Center Strike Force to approximately $938 million.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      This is the type of fuck you cut spending we need more of. So much waste in government, so much fraud. A lot of it to favored nations like china or Africa and dem favored groups.

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        I'll take whatever I can get. And fighting fraud (and stopping the flow of money to activists and communists) is certainly important. But stopping fraud isn't necessarily stopping spending. I don't want this money spent on non-fraud either.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Estimates in the discretionary budget for waste and frsuf sre over 20%. Medicaid and Medicare is 15%. Social security is 10 to 15%

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            And rooting out that fraud is a great thing for the DOJ to be doing. I just hope it get's followed up with commensurate cuts to those budgets.

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              Im fine with cutting all of them to zero. It just wont ever happen. So my focus is on the possible.

            2. damikesc   2 months ago

              Democrats will claim ANY cuts would be trying to kill grandma. So, no, it is unlikely to happen. Unless you specify EXACTLY how much was taken via fraud and pass bills to cut spending by that exact amount.

              1. Zeb   2 months ago

                Well, at least someone should try doing that.

                1. damikesc   2 months ago

                  No Democrats and too many do nothing useless Republicans to do anything.

                  Murkowski would never go along. Ditto Collins.

                  1. Zeb   2 months ago

                    I think there is some value to at least trying. Make them go on record as opposing cutting spending that is just being wasted or enriching frausters.

          2. Nelson   2 months ago

            “ Estimates in the discretionary budget for waste and frsuf sre over 20%. Medicaid and Medicare is 15%. Social security is 10 to 15%”

            Not honest estimates. But yes, there are liars and motivated politicians who say that (but I repeat myself).

  8. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Islam has not stopped their attacks since 9/11. They have just switched their tools. Since that day their leaders and imams have publicly stated their new tools are using the institutions of the west as a weapon against them. We see thisnin Europe and in the US. Cries of racism to undo criticism. Foreign funding of politicians and political groups. Abuse of asylum laws. Mass migration and taking over localities.

    We've learned nothing. Even W was again proclaiming tge religion of peace and focusing on not pushing back against Islam.

    1. Nelson   2 months ago

      See over there in the distance? That’s Reality. You should rejoin it.

  9. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    Twenty-five years ago today, Islamic extremist terrorists muslim following the example set by the pedophile mohammed when he arrived in Medina, hijacked planes headed for Los Angeles and San Francisco from Boston, Newark, and Dulles and flew them into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, killing thousands in one fell swoop.

  10. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Clancy copycats are increasing.

    https://thepostmillennial.com/clancy-obsessed-corie-walsh-planned-to-poison-her-husband-after-hanging-2-year-old-son-from-rafters-prosecutors

    https://www.foxnews.com/us/days-after-lindsay-clancy-mistrial-another-massachusetts-mom-accused-killing-her-children-seeks-freedom

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Haha. The only rational juror on the clancy case was black. How will dems spend this?

      Curtis Houck
      @CurtisHouck
      NEW: Lindsay Clancy juror Paula Devlin reveals on 'CBS Mornings' that the lone, male holdout juror who voted to find Clancy guilty of murdering her children was the *only* person of color -- a black man.

      The 11 not-guilty jurors -- who hectored him for a week to cave -- were all white.

      They do seem to be trying to expose the juror though.

      1. Z Crazy   2 months ago

        He felt white lives matter.

      2. Eeyore   2 months ago

        Uncle Tom - obviously.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2098483702107930645

        Lindsay Clancy fan discovering that the lone juror is black might be the greatest video in history

        [video]

  11. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Scenes from NYC: Comrade Mayor signs 9/11 order, gives pen to lawyer paid to defend al-Qaeda.

    https://x.com/david_sivella/status/2096272209043927374

    It’s a bit tone deaf to be signing this 9/11 Executive Order with your Chief Counsel, Ramzi Kassem, a former al-Qaeda defense lawyer, in the shot, Boy
    @NYCMayor

    Or was it deliberate on your part to give your Muslim base a hint that this is all BS to pacify other New Yorkers?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      It’s a signal that New Yorkers are idiots.

  12. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    The thing that we are promised never happens happened again.

    https://redstate.com/kyle-becker/2026/09/10/the-thing-that-never-happens-keeps-happening-now-the-proof-is-undeniable-n2206779

    And read what had to happen to charge. Verify voter form, verify vote, read local voter log book. A time consuming process.

    Apparently a check box doesn't stop voter fraud.

    Then we have this.

    F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli
    U.S. Department of Justice
    @USAttyEssayli
    California Election Fraud Update:

    James Brass, 47, of Victorville, was arrested today on a federal indictment charging him with paying people on Skid Row in downtown Los Angeles to sign petitions using stolen identities of registered voters to qualify initiatives on ballots in California elections.

    Brass is expected to make his initial appearance this afternoon in United States District Court in Riverside.

    Also charged in the two-count indictment are two petition circulators who worked for Brass: Courtney Price, 49, of Jacksonville, Florida, and Jateisha Herron, 33, of Boron, California.

    https://x.com/USAttyEssayli/status/2098044944984207559

    Petitions follow the same verification procedures as voting in most states. And you see here they were paying homeless to pretend to be other voters, using stolen identities. Nothing is different with mail in voting.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      And the same late night shifts for left wing parties is happening globally. We saw it again in Germany to keep AfD out of controlling power.

      https://dailysceptic.org/2026/09/10/how-did-germanys-anti-afd-firewall-hold/

  13. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Ro Khanna has a Fang Fang problem? What is it with Democrats and their Chinese connections?

    Henry Yin has been associated with Rep. Ro Khanna as a Senior Advisor on Foreign Trade and Economic Development, although there are conflicting reports about his official role in Khanna's office. Yin has significant ties to the Chinese Communist Party, which could be a potential liability for Khanna's political aspirations.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/2028-dem-hopeful-s-longtime-ally-exposed-for-deep-ties-to-ccp-officials-good-friends/ar-AA2buEuA

    Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., has been floated as a potential 2028 Democratic contender for president, but his longtime ally and former senior advisor on foreign trade and economic development could be a liability due to his deep ties to Chinese Communist Party officials, a Fox News Digital investigation found.

    Henry Yin is a longtime California businessman and political operative who Khanna has praised for his "leadership" and has called one of his "good friends" on Facebook. He was born in China, raised in Taiwan and then moved to the United States, where he has lived for several decades.

    However, while living in California, Yin has been a major player helping China get a foothold in California over the last several decades through multiple roles, including serving as a member of the California Commission for Economic Development and founding a consulting firm that included multiple corporate clients with ties to Chinese Communist Party officials.

    In addition to his consulting business and several overseas trips to China, Yin has allegedly attended at least 10 events hosted by United Front groups, including the All-China Federation of Returned Overseas Chinese (ACFROC), according to China expert Jackie Deal, the president of Long Term Strategy Group, a defense research firm. Fox News Digital has extensively reported on the CCP's United Front and the threat it poses to U.S. institutions as the CCP gains influence in the United States.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      China bought the dem party under clinton in the 90s.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Clinton seemingly handed them pretty much all the satellite tech we had at the time.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          And a lot of nuclear.

  14. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Hypocrisy of the left.

    WasAcop
    @WasAcop
    🚨Meet Stella Creasy: proud feminist Labour MP who campaigned against men-only clubs like the Garrick.

    This weekend she attended a gender-segregated Muslim parade in her constituency, posted the men’s march, then confirmed women take part separately.

    • Men-only British club = exclusion that holds women back

    • Segregated religious parade = valid tradition women choose

    • Same spaces for women in elite institutions, separate spaces when it’s a Muslim event…

    https://x.com/WasAcop/status/2097063407161639009

    Giving up all their supposed principles to support Muslims.

  15. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    London unveils the spirit of London. An ugly fat black statue in the caricature style of the racist democrat early 1900s south.

    https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2098115038594630056

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      lol @ “fixed it”.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        This one is good too.

        https://x.com/FineSilverBack/status/2098276725729739122

      2. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Just think, in 2,500 yrs. anthropologists are going to unearth the head of that statue and declare that modern Brits weren't clear on whether a "white armed" Vanessa Kirby was African or not.

  16. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "That never happens!"

    https://www.wsj.com/opinion/trump-administration-kansas-city-lawsuit-gender-transitions-schools-7ea59e90?mod=hp_opin_pos_2

    The Supreme Court said on its emergency docket this year that schools are likely violating the Constitution if they help students change genders and then keep it secret from their parents. But some administrators haven’t gotten the memo, and on Tuesday the Justice Department sued the school district in Kansas City, Kan., arguing its internal guidance violates the law.

    “If any staff member learns a student is transgender or gender non-conforming,” the document says, according to the lawsuit, “that information should be relayed to the school principal without delay.” The principal can discuss accommodations and schedule a meeting to go over pronouns and locker rooms. If the student doesn’t want to tell the parents, “that request will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis,” factoring in age, grade, welfare, “and any other relevant information.”

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Same district that hired that illegal to be superintendent?

      1. rbike   2 months ago

        That was Des moines Iowa, not Kansas. Less corn.

  17. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Those pesky Jews!

    https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2026/09/03/michigan-jews-turn-against-el-sayed-n4956863

    More than 400 Michigan Jewish Democrats and independents — including Democrat mega-donor Rob Orley — went public Wednesday with their support for GOP Senate candidate Mike Rogers over Democrat Abdul El-Sayed.

    "Many of us have been fiercely supportive of Democratic candidates and principles," the open letter says. "All of us have felt threatened and alienated by the politics and allies embraced by Abdul El-Sayed, which has included demonization of Jews, equivocation on terrorism, exclusion of Jewish Americans from public life, and expression of implacable hatred of the world’s only Jewish nation."

    The statement adds that "Our vote for Mike Rogers does not require that we agree with him on every issue or that we support President Trump," so it isn't like all the signers are suddenly switching parties and donning MAGA hats.

    But with the direction the Democrats are going these days, maybe that could change.

    in Michigan, Democrat primary voters decided to take their chances sending an actual Islamist to the United States Senate, and the best that the party can come up with to soothe its Jewish constituents to place the “needs of the world” over their own “self-interest” and “security.” That came from no less than Michigan State Attorney General Dana Nessel, herself Jewish.

    That thought, if you'll allow me to call it that, was echoed this week by New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg. "I hope [Jewish voters] listen," she wrote. "To me there's no question that Trump and his villainous menagerie are infinitely worse than [Hasan] Piker. But telling people to ignore their own perceived self-interest is a hard sell, and El-Sayed."

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      El Sayed is also screaming AIPAC like everyone's favorite libertarian.

    2. Nelson   2 months ago

      If only the Republican politicians and donors had been similarly principled when Trump ran. Today’s GOP is where principles and honesty go to die.

  18. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Of course, given that we are in the stupidest timeline, we are going to get comment after comment about "Islam is the problem". No, Islam is not the problem. Terrorists who commit horrible crimes in the name of Islam are the problem. You want to blame an entire religion for the crimes of a few? Fine, then if you are a Christian, then I blame **YOU** for the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Thirty Years War, the mass murder of indigenous people around the world by Christian zealots, and all manner of crimes committed over the centuries by Christians in the name of their faith. Oh wait, you don't want to be held responsible for the murder of millions? Then hold everyone else to the same standard.

    "Christians" are not responsible for the misery and death of the Thirty Years War.
    "Muslims" are not responsible for the terrorist crimes of a few.
    "Jews" are not responsible for what Netanyahu does in Gaza.

    See how that works?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Go fuck yourself.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Go fuck yourself and then say you were sorry to yourself*

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Except the criticism of Islam is about what is happening now, not what they did hundreds of years ago. Christians have generally given up on the idea that they should convert the whole world through force or invasion. That's just not the case for Islam. I'm not one to blame every single Muslim for it. But it's hardly some fringe minority that firmly believes that their role and destiny is to make the whole world submit to their religion and ideology.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        But it's hardly some fringe minority that firmly believes that their role and destiny is to make the whole world submit to their religion and ideology.

        In TODAY'S world, yes, that is a fringe view to make the world submit to their religion BY FORCE, just like it is a fringe view among Christians.

        Of course EVERY faith believes that theirs is the one true faith, and that the world would be better off if they all shared their own faith. Christians and Jews and Muslims and everyone else preach and proselytize, and that's totally fine. So of course devout Muslims will tend to believe that the world would be better off if everyone was Muslim, just like evangelical Christians believe the same about their faith. That doesn't mean that either group wants to conquer the world by force.

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          Well, Jews don't really proselytize.
          And yeah, Muslims do want to conquer the world. Not all Muslims, sure, but it's enough that it warrants concern. It's just not compatible with western values of liberty and universal rights.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Muslims do want to conquer the world.

            What is the empirical evidence in favor of this claim? That "Muslims" AS A GROUP want to "conquer the world", in the modern era?

            1. damikesc   2 months ago

              They SAY they do. Repeatedly.

            2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

              *AS A GROUP*

              Awww, yeaahhh, there he goes again.

              What an asshole.

            3. Zeb   2 months ago

              As a group, they kind of do. As individuals, no it's not universal.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                What is the empirical evidence for this, though?

                Again the claim here isn't that Muslims believe the world would be better off if everyone was Muslim (every religion claims that), the claim isn't that there are some radical Muslims who do initiate force (there of course are), the claim that Muslims AS A GROUP want to use force to conquer the world and convert everyone to Islam by the sword. In the modern era. I'm sorry but I just don't see it.

          2. Nelson   2 months ago

            “ It's just not compatible with western values of liberty and universal rights.”

            Neither is Christian Nationalism or theocracy, and yet Christians have been pushing it since they hung Jesus on a giant coat rack.

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              Yet somehow those values emerged in a very Christian culture. I don't think that was purely a coincidence.

              1. Nelson   2 months ago

                Western values aren’t Christian values. The Venn diagram has overlap, but the Enlightenment shares more with today’s Western values than Christianity.

                Remember, secular government is a Western value.

            2. Uilleam   2 months ago

              Jesus was crucified; thee most painful, tortuous method used to kill a person, and that fact has been verified historically more than any other single event in history. Whether or not you want to believe that He is God is your own prerogative, but all your comment does is display your ignorance and anger at something you claim to not believe in.

              1. Zeb   2 months ago

                that fact has been verified historically more than any other single event in history

                That seems like a stretch.

              2. Nelson   2 months ago

                “ Jesus was crucified”

                Yes, he was. And I said as much. Perhaps you don’t appreciate my pithy way of describing it, but I don’t appreciate Christian Nationalists trying to subjugate individual rights to their religious beliefs.

                I am contemptuous of Christian Nationalists, not Christians. And nothing gets the zealots bent out of shape faster than being too casual about their origin story or pointing out that they support international pedophile rings.

                Which you proved with your false and angry claims about my post.

                Christianity is fine for anyone who chooses to believe in it. It’s when people who don’t choose it get forced to behave as if they do that I get irritated.

        2. rbike   2 months ago

          You know this how? Empirical evidence, ignoring reality and the great pedophile proffet's approval of lying to spread his hate?

          You our outdoing your dumbass self today.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Where are the Muslim-majority nations invading non-Muslim nations? Where is the large-scale military campaigns against non-Muslim nations? The claim being made here is that Muslims AS A GROUP want to "conquer the world", so where is the GROUP-level effort to make that happen? Not just the fringe radical terrorists, but the whole bulk of them?

            As for taqqiya, it is not a license for Muslims to lie at every turn. It is only permitted in Shia Islam to lie about one's faith under threat of extreme religious persecution (torture or death). It is a license to lie as a defensive matter against aggression and persecution. It is NOT a license to lie as an AGGRESSIVE tactic to obtain some advantage. Maybe you should learn something about what you are talking about first.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              Right now they're all over Western Europe: Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Spain. It's amusing how hard he works pretending to not understand.

              Colonizing is the worst movement in the word, and it's also totally racist to criticize colonizing depending on who is colonizing who. The operative principle determining which is appropriate is whether they are considered allies of the left.

            2. damikesc   2 months ago

              "Where is the large-scale military campaigns against non-Muslim nations?"

              10/7 was not THAT long ago. Muslim militaries being absolute shit is not a defense.

              "As for taqqiya, it is not a license for Muslims to lie at every turn."

              We should rely on your expert knowledge of Islam --- knowledge you never demonstrated (still have not, mind you) --- why?

              Why are you fellating Muslims? You pretend to give a shit about rights yet THE VAST MAJORITY OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES have an abysmal record on human rights. Have for centuries and continue to do so.

              But they don't like Trump, so they are peachy keen with you.

            3. rbike   2 months ago

              Mohammed sent his agent to lie to his enemy, Mohammed's agent served as his servant to get close to him, and then murdered Mohammed's enemy. Remember that story? A Muslim lying to someone for Mohammed and then turning on them? It's in the Koran.

              Similar to Jesus in the New testament, right?

              1. rbike   2 months ago

                Well, looking it up this may be in error as my memory seems to be foggy. But there are lists of 100's of people that the amazing Prophet Mohammed had killed, mostly for being apostates or for having mocked him. What a sad loser. Truly the leader of a death cult.

                Not really my type of hero and orders of magnitude below Joe Biden, let alone Jesus.

          2. Nelson   2 months ago

            “ You know this how? Empirical evidence, ignoring reality and the great pedophile proffet's approval of lying to spread his hate?”

            Why are you bringing the Pope into this discussion?

            Oh, you mean the pedophiles that Mohammed supported in the 12th century, not the pedophiles that the Catholics support today. And the Southern Baptists. And the Boy Scouts. And the Mormons. And the Amish. And … well, you get the point.

            I find people who decry pedophilia in their enemies but support pedophilia in their friends to be morally bankrupt because, you know, they are.

            1. Uilleam   2 months ago

              Nonsensical nonsense from a raving lunatic.

              1. Nelson   2 months ago

                No, facts from someone whose father was raped by a priest who was moved to 9 different parishes and raped at least 12 boys.

                Go fuck yourself.

      2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

        Are Muslim terrorists trying to convert/subject the world or are they just trying to get the world to stop interfering with their region with their ill-advised violence?

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          Probably both.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          My FB feed is filled with "Islam will be in every house!" and "SHOULD PORK BE REMOVED FROM SCHOOL CAFETARIAS OUT OF RESPECT FOR MUSLIMS??? " postings. Along with various taqiyya-filled posts about how awesome Islam is for women, how peaceful it is to other religions, and the like.

          Notice how many "refugees" are from Islamic NAME countries (N Afr., Mid East) and that the vast majority of them are military age single men, and that they never seem to seek asylum in Qatar or Saudi Arabia?

          1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            I get what what you're saying.

            Muslim refugees/migrants are and undeniable issue in Europe and increasingly here. So you think this is a planned "replacement" or method of raising an eventual military uprising?

            I work/worked with a few Muslims from India and one from Jordan that don't seem to (outwardly) fit this profile at all so I infer violence is not universal to Islam.

            One Indian Muslim became a pretty close friend. We joke around, go fishing and talk about hot chicks and stuff just like I do with my American friends. I never saw him doing the prayers or anything like that though.

            There seems to be something about the ME, religion and violence though. That's where we send our missiles. Israel too.

            1. damikesc   2 months ago

              Most likely, hate to say it, is they will be nice and friendly --- until they have enough numbers to gain political power. Then they will dominate you.

              Muslims did not start off being unmitigated cocks in the UK. That came as their numbers increased.

            2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

              France has proposed new laws to try to prevent 'entryism', which is the intentional insinuation of Islam into government and society, and Muslims (esp. Muslim Brotherhood) into public office. France has anti-separatism laws to try to prevent mosques and the like from promoting non-integration.

              Islamist imam explains the plan to take over America:

              “Big change is coming to America. First, we nominate a Muslim mayor. Then, we nominate people to the school board of education. That’s how demographic change begins. We have the most children. Soon, a Muslim president.”

              1. damikesc   2 months ago

                ...which is why school boards might need to be disbanded and handled on a statewide basis.

            3. rbike   2 months ago

              Your friend risks death if he leaves Islam. Islamaphobia is most present in Muslims, not in Americans. See Islam for the Death cult that it is.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Since Mike responded...

            Youll get used to living under sharia law.

            1. Nelson   2 months ago

              Idiot.

              The theological forces of Christianity can’t even get their religious laws imposed on our secular society, but you think Islam will?

              I can’t decide if you aren’t an idiot and just say the stupid things you do because you revel in anger, hatred and strife or if you truly believe the constant stream of stupidity you post.

              1. Uilleam   2 months ago

                Except English common law and the entire framework of Western society is based on Judeo-Christian values. The abolition of slavery and its codification derived from Christian values, championed and achieved by Christians. Christian values set the framework of our Constitution and permeate our legal system. Conversely, waging Jihad is literally one of the ways to reach heaven, from the Quran. You have got to be one of the most ignorant, asinine commenters here. Right up there with Jeff.

                1. Nelson   2 months ago

                  “ Except English common law and the entire framework of Western society is based on Judeo-Christian values.”

                  It isn’t. Christian zealots who want to live in a theocracy say it all the time, but it remains complete nonsense.

                  America, for example, is an Enlightenment country full of Christians, not a Christian country full of secularists.

              2. Marshal   2 months ago

                This is the common analytic mistake of creating a label and treating everything under that label as equivalent to hide the differences in the underlying population. Christianity does not even try to use force to compel obedience. It took a centuries-long reformation to embed this refusal to use force as a base tenet of Western Civilization. By contrast Islam has undertaken no such reform and routinely uses force for such purposes.

                The belief our society could resist militant Islam because it largely rejects a consensual Christianity demonstrates an utter failure of understanding. These two things are nothing alike.

                1. Nelson   2 months ago

                  “ Christianity does not even try to use force to compel obedience.”

                  Of course it does. If Christians weren’t pushing anti-abortion laws, the anti-abortion movement would collapse. When you believe your morals are more important than someone else’s rights, you are forcing them on others. And that’s just one example.

                  “ The belief our society could resist militant Islam because it largely rejects a consensual Christianity demonstrates an utter failure of understanding. These two things are nothing alike.”

                  America will reject Sharia law for the same reason it rejects Christian theocracy, despite the efforts of Christian Nationalists. We don’t want, don’t trust, and don’t like religion in government. It leads to misery, suffering, and war. We finally broke the cycle with the Enlightenment and it has been a better world ever since as those ideals have shaped Western society.

                  Secularism is a Western (and particularly an American) value. It refuses to be overwhelmed by the dominant American religion, so it certainly has no chance of succumbing to a lesser faith.

                  1. Marshal   2 months ago

                    When you believe your morals are more important than someone else’s rights, you are forcing them on others. And that’s just one example.

                    Pro lifers believe the baby's rights to live are more important than the mother's rights to not be pregnant much in the same way they believe a murder victim's right to life are more important than a murderer's right to freedom. You lie that this is about morals because it allows you to preen rather than address the conflict forthrightly. Moreover influencing the law is nothing like using force so you aren't providing evidence of your point anyway.

                    We don’t want, don’t trust, and don’t like religion in government.

                    Western Europeans don't want massively elevated rape levels either, yet they have them. It's bizarre you think not wanting something actually prevents it. As I already pointed out it's easy to reject a religion that accepts your rejection. That provides no evidence we will be able to reject a religion which embraces coercive force. This is fantasy thinking.

                    1. Nelson   2 months ago

                      “ Pro lifers believe the baby's rights”

                      You’re begging the question. It isn’t a baby or a person or have any rights until it, at the very least, has met the minimum requirements for independent life.

                      A potential person isn’t a person. And whether it is a person requires a non-zero chance of survival outside the womb. You want us to assume that the fetus will be born, but there’s no predicting that.

                      Before viability, there isn’t a conflict of rights. There is only one person with rights: the mother.

                      “ it allows you to preen rather than address the conflict forthrightly.”

                      I have always addressed the conflict forthrightly, it’s the anti-abortionists who run away from it. There is no conflict because there is only one person. Until you can prove, rather than just begging the question, that a fertilized egg is a person with rights, forcing everyone else to pretend it is is exactly the moralistic coercion that I’m talking about.

                      If you’re right, you should be able to prove it. If you can’t prove it and are reduced to bleating that you are right and everyone else must accept it, you are the one being coercive and moralistic and authoritarian.

                      In a free country, we require you to have a convincing premise before we let you create laws around it. Anti-abortionists don’t have a convincing argument.

                      “ Moreover influencing the law is nothing like using force so you aren't providing evidence of your point anyway.”

                      Laws literally coerce behavior. That’s the point. If you have a valid and convincing reason for a law, then it has a chance of being a good law. If you have an unestablished and largely rejected premise, like anti-abortionists, it can only be a bad law.

                      Abortion bans are the definition of bad laws.

                      “ Western Europeans don't want massively elevated rape levels either, yet they have them.”

                      And yet no one is calling the Catholic Church to task and allows them to continue to shelter hundreds, if not thousands, of pedophile priests.

                      The way we know you are a dishonest zealot is you wish to push guilt for the behavior of individuals on an entire religion and want to pretend that the proven, intentional, and overt actions of the largest and longest pedophile ring in the history of the world doesn’t exist.

                      When you condemn people who don’t deserve condemnation because you hate them and defend people who have been proven to be guilty of heinous and immoral crimes (while falsely holding themselves out to be a moral authority, adding hypocrisy and lying to the rape and conspiracy), it’s pretty clear you are in favor of pedophiles and rapists, as long as they are of the same religion as you.

                      “ It's bizarre you think not wanting something actually prevents it.”

                      I don’t. I think that actively preventing something from happening prevents it from happening, which is why theocracy and religion-based legislation meed to be rigorously rejected every time it’s tried.

                      And the evil people who support theocracy will never stop trying.

          3. Nelson   2 months ago

            “ Notice how many "refugees" are from Islamic NAME countries (N Afr., Mid East) and that the vast majority of them are military age single men, and that they never seem to seek asylum in Qatar or Saudi Arabia?”

            No. And neither has anyone else who is looking at reality.

        3. Agammamon   2 months ago

          The former.

    3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Jeffy loves all the little children...
      Mohammed loves all the little children...
      Jeffy loves islam which premits him to love the little children...

    4. Z Crazy   2 months ago

      Saying Islam isn't a problem is like saying assault weapons arent a problem.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Only one of the two IS a problem. "Assault weapons" (something still never defined) are a non-issue at the worst of times.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          Assault weapon has been defined, particularly in various laws that have been passed. You just don’t like what the definition is.

          There’s a difference.

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            You are right, it is defined in laws. The better complaint is that it is a nonsense category deliberately named to ensure people who don't know about guns conflate them with military assault rifles.

            1. Nelson   2 months ago

              Possibly because they are modeled on and can be converted into an analogue of a military assault rifle? And they are championed and wielded by camo-wearing wanna-bes who cosplay as military and retired military who cosplay as heroes?

          2. damikesc   2 months ago

            No, they were "defined" by people with zero knowledge of guns and had no idea what they were doing.

            Assault weapons, bluntly, are just "guns that look scary".

            Semi-automatic? That is everything but revolvers.

            Scary accessories are laughable on a good day. These same clowns believe suppressors make gunfire nearly silent.

            10 rounds being "high capacity"? The majority of magazines have held more than 10 rounds for a very long time.

            The people trying to control guns do not know ANYTHING about them.

      2. rbike   2 months ago

        Um, my " assault weapon " is not a problem. Very reliable.

    5. Marshal   2 months ago

      Fine, then if you are a Christian, then I blame **YOU** for the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Thirty Years War, the mass murder of indigenous people around the world by Christian zealots, and all manner of crimes committed over the centuries by Christians in the name of their faith. Oh wait, you don't want to be held responsible for the murder of millions? Then hold everyone else to the same standard.

      The reveal here is that this is exactly how left wingers feel about Christians, and similar thoughts about Jews are why they have embraced anti-Semitism en masse. In reality they are demanding Muslims be treated differently, not the same.

      As always Jeffey is trying to propagandize. In reality Islam is different than Christian and Jewish faiths because those faiths do not preach world political domination. In Christianity's case this was after a centuries-long reformation which Jeffey obliquely recognizes by using examples from centuries ago. It's hardly a surprise that a faith preaching political domination through violence has more adherents engaging in it, a reality Jeffey and other leftists are desperate to conceal.

      1. Nelson   2 months ago

        Religion has killed more people in history than any other cause. Probably more than all others combined, because religious zealots feel justifies in killing for their faith.

        That moral bankruptcy isn’t limited to any one faith. They all do it.

        1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

          God damn you for being such a lying shitbag.

          200 million people killed in the last century by Communists and you want to pretend that the 20-40,000 killed over 400 years by the inquisition is infinitely worse?

          Estimates put 7% of all wars throughout human history as religious. The number killed in religious wars is in the tens of millions and the vast majority of that was by Muslims.

          Glory in your ignorance. It is all you have.

          1. Nelson   2 months ago

            “ you want to pretend that the 20-40,000 killed over 400 years by the inquisition is infinitely worse?”

            The inquisition was just one of many examples of religion killing people. There have been entire wars caused by religion. 3000 people died on 9/11 because of religion.

            And the communist whatabout is just pathetic. Yes, Communism has killed hundreds of millions. But religion has been killing people since the moment it was invented and it will continue to kill people until the heat death of the universe or the extinction of humans, whichever comes first.

            Religious killing will never end. And every religion does it. None of them have stopped and none of them will. Because a person filled with religious certainty is a person who can commit any atrocity. And every single year, they do.

            So fuck off, you ignorant zealot. Point the finger at everyone else and pretend your religion’s hands aren’t as bloody as everyone else’s. You’re only fooling yourself.

        2. damikesc   2 months ago

          "Religion has killed more people in history than any other cause."

          Marxism dwarfs all religions combined. And in WAY less time.

          1. Nelson   2 months ago

            And? That makes it OK? That excuses the constant and ongoing deaths that religoon causes?

            Whataboutism is an admission that you can’t deny the accusation. And religion has been killing people for tens of thousands of years, so it has racked up quite a body count.

            FYI, “It’s only killed the second-most number of people in history” isn’t the moral validation you think it is.

        3. Marshal   2 months ago

          Religion has killed more people in history than any other cause. Probably more than all others combined,

          Left wingers often believe this but that's because they are ahistorical fools. While religion has often been an excuse the underlying cause is more often political power. In addition these analyses omit the conflict resolution impact religions have within their religious group. this conflict resolution was profound and most political driven analyses begin by using this reduced conflict as the base rather than the violence level which pre-existed the monotheistic religions.

          1. Nelson   2 months ago

            “ While religion has often been an excuse the underlying cause is more often political power.”

            That is pure deflection. And religion is about 20,000 years old, so it’s racked up quite a body count.

            And like I mentioned above, being Hitler instead of Stalin in the body count game isn’t the validation you think it is.

            I get that you seem to want to pretend that organized religion is suddenly a force for good (although thousands of raped children might disagree). But the willingness to hate and kill over the details of one story about God versus another has never, and will never, stop.

            Just look at how some Christians here talk about Muslims. Look at how Jews are treated by Christians (because if you don’t think there’s a sizable contingent of “they killed Jesus” Christians, you’re lying to yourself). Look at how Christians are treated by Muslims. How Hindis are treated by. Buddhists (and vice-versa). Religious intolerance is an epidemic and every religion is infected.

            Blind hatred of individuals because of the actions of others who share the same general religious tradition will never go away. And hatred begets violence. And religion is used to justify it.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              That is pure deflection. And religion is about 20,000 years old, so it’s racked up quite a body count.,

              You pretend this is deflection because you've been trained to look at violence only in contexts that drive your political preferences and refuse to expand your mind. Instead of blindly assigning violence to "religion" while refusing to assign to "non-religious" ask yourself what existed in Europe before Christianity. Was it an Eden of peace? Or was it centuries of Viking raids and slavery, and in other times more or less constant tribal warfare?

              This shows that the violence is not from or even about religion, it is inherent to the human condition. Religion tends to change who the violence is against rather than increasing it.

              1. Nelson   2 months ago

                “ Instead of blindly assigning violence to "religion" while refusing to assign to "non-religious"”

                I didn’t. When there is religion involved, I claim religion is involved. When there isn’t, I don’t.

                Religion has always advanced itself through violence, coercion, fear, and power. Religion as a motivation for violence is ubiquitous throughout history. It’s just zealots and liars try to pretend it just happened to be lying around when violence broke out. It’s laughably transparent and obviously false. Next you’ll tell me the Crusades (including the ones that raped and pillaged their way … until the just chose to keep raping and pillaging … weren’t religious.

                “ This shows that the violence is not from or even about religion, it is inherent to the human condition.”

                That is the most dishonest cop-out and abdication of responsibility that I’ve ever read. Confederate apologists who insist the Civil War wasn’t about slavery would look at it and say, ‘Damn. Even we don’t lie that much.’.

                Religion isn’t a motivation for violence, it’s just humans being humans? You have no moral center at all, do you?

      2. mad.casual   2 months ago

        The reveal here is that this is exactly how left wingers feel about Christians, and similar thoughts about Jews are why they have embraced anti-Semitism en masse. In reality they are demanding Muslims be treated differently, not the same.

        And the subtext is, at best, Sam Little or Harold Shipman extolling the virtues of Lindsay Clancy against Mary Mallon.

        To be clear, if you take the entire 400 yrs. span of The Spanish Inquisition and add up all the bodies counted or projected between Catholic records, Jewish records, Protestant records, and impartial historians, anthropologists, and epidemiologists sifting through the records, it's approximately the size of *just* 9/11. Even then, the overwhelming majority of the deaths from The Inquisition, were (however unfairly) warned, tried, offered the opportunity to confess, etc., rather than simply crushed or blown up without question simply for being on the wrong soil.

        And again, this skips past the fact that Hitler, Stalin, and Mao easily eclipse their predecessors in history save, maybe*, Genghis Kahn and Hong Xiuquan.

        *Total numbers may be comparable but speed and totality still clearly favor the former.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          “ it's approximately the size of *just* 9/11”

          It isn’t. And we aren’t just talking about the Inquisition.

          “ The Inquisition, were (however unfairly) warned, tried, offered the opportunity to confess, etc., rather than simply crushed or blown up without question simply for being on the wrong soil.”

          And this, to you, is a defense of religious violence? Jesus.

    6. damikesc   2 months ago

      Are WE doing it currently?

      Have we done it for a few centuries?

      Fuck you.

      1. Nelson   2 months ago

        Christians? Killing? Not on the regular.

        Raping children? Constantly, unapologetically, in an organized fashion, without remorse, without morals, and without decency, helping protect those who rape children? Constantly.

        Whether God exists is one of life’s great questions. Whether any religion on Earth is moral isn’t. They are all self-interested, immoral, power-seeking and unapologetically self-serving.

        If there is a God and it has a moral code, not a single religion on Earth would match it.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          "Raping children? Constantly, unapologetically, in an organized fashion, without remorse, without morals, and without decency, helping protect those who rape children? Constantly."

          You misspelled "public school teachers" there.

          1. Nelson   2 months ago

            First, priests have raped more children than public school teachers. The fact that there are 3,000,000 teachers and 30,000 priests makes the number of rapes seem higher, but the rape-per-priest number is higher than any other. And that doesn’t include the other religions, like the Southern Baptists who have a long history of hiding their rapist ministers.

            But the most significant difference is that when individual teachers rape kids, virtually every time the other teachers condemn them and aid in the prosecution. There is no organized protection of teachers.

            Contrast that with the Catholic Church, who actively pressured victims not to go to law enforcement, actively interfered with investigations, actively moved pedophile priests to another parish (and then another, and another, and another), actively removed pedophile priests from jurisdictions and even countries to avoid prosecution. They actively organized an international pedophile ring and did it for centuries.

            Even now, they have records of accusations against pedophile priests that they refuse to turn over to law enforcement. Even now they fight any effort to hold them accountable, criminally or financially. Even now they pretend to be interested in repentance and healing, but every time they create a board or panel or group that includes victims or people from outside the Church, it rapidly fails because they are not doing it in good faith and won’t share any information with anyone so the ones they fooled into thinking they were being honest quit.

            Tell me, in the Christian faith, what does it mean if you claim to be repentant but don’t truly repent?

            The Catholic Church has not, will not, and cannot repent without admitting they did evil. Deep, repeated, constant, century-plus evil.

            So all you apologists and liars and whataboutists and gaslighters can go fuck yourself. What the Catholic Church has (and is) doing is unprecedented. It is sinister. It is evil. The depth and breadth of their depravity, their shamelessness and lack of remorse or contrition, and their hypocrisy is unlike anything else in history.

            They run the longest, largest, most organized, most intimidating, most unapologetic and most constant pedophile ring in the history of the world.

      2. Nelson   2 months ago

        “ Are WE doing it currently?”

        Yes.

    7. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      “…,,,committed over the centuries….”

      Get with the times, asshole. For all your *selective nuance* you fucked up your own argument right there.

      Idiot.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        You all LOVE to continually bring up what Prophet Muhammad did over 1000 years ago. The atrocities of the Christian world are more recent than that.

  19. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    France sees sexual violent crimes increase 300+%, Poland sees 60+% decrease over same period. Hmm, I wonder what's different?

    https://x.com/NateFriedman97/status/2095218530580877554?s=20

    https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5LWNvcHk_95167ad8-d828-40f7-8443-965f2b0c10e8

    Approximate police-recorded rape counts from the EIGE/Eurostat administrative series (and national police where the series is incomplete). Percentages are rough; some countries changed definitions mid-period.

    High-inflow Western / Nordic

    Country ~2008 ~2024 Direction
    France 10,277 ~46,000 +340%
    Sweden ~5,400 9,309 +70% (already high; consent-based law since 2018)
    Germany ~7,400 14,521 +97%
    Austria 600 2,443 +300%
    Denmark 973 2,239 +130%
    Spain 1,474 4,825 +227% (classification change after 2022 “solo sí es sí”)
    Ireland low hundreds 1,039 sharp rise

    Low-inflow Central / Eastern (pre-2022 Ukraine wave)

    Country~2008~2024Direction
    Poland 1,611 ~530–541 –67%
    Bulgaria 262 79 down
    Lithuania 146 67 down
    Slovakia low 132 low and stable
    Portugal251 273 flat
    Hungary 213 489u p from a very low base; rate still low

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      If you want to have a good time in Europe, only go to Poland.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Polish chicks tend to be kinda hot. Also had the only watchable performance on Eurovision in, at least, 20 years.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      But the population rates!!! - David bier

    3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      DoNt BlAmE iSlAm - pedojeffy

  20. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    I begged Facebook today to at least pause the endless stream of "Islam is perfect" and "America must stop eating bacon out of respect for Muslims" posts for one day. One day!

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      This is what Norm Macdonald warned us about.

      1. Nelson   2 months ago

        Why doesn’t it surprise me that you liked Norm MacDonald? Even when it comes to humor you make bad decisions.

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          Norm was great. What is wrong with you?

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            He is not very bright.

          2. Nelson   2 months ago

            Norm MacDonald never made a funny joke in his life. When you manage to fuck up Weekend Update, the softest of gigs out there, it shows how epically unfunny you are.

            Norm was epically unfunny.

        2. Jesse fantasizes about having a 3some with Dave Smith and Maddow   2 months ago

          Now we know who Nelson is: you guessed it, Frank Stallone!

  21. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Furthermore, the radical Muslim terrorists WANT us to be fighting their entire religion. That is partly what inspires them. They WANT the Holy War between themselves and the Infidel West. It is their version of the Book of Revelation, the end times, and to them represents the fulfillment of prophecy of Scripture. So every time you all whip up anti-Muslim sentiment and try to turn people against the entire faith of Islam, you are doing exactly what the terrorists want you to do.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      They dont WANT a holy war kiddie diddler. They are actively fighting it.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Delusion and ignorance (and support of pedophiles) is jeffs greatest strength.

      2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        The radical terrorists are, yes, they are trying to goad the US and other Western powers into an all-out Islam-vs-the-World holy war. We should decline to take them up on their offer.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          Do you really want to go over the polls of what "non-radical" Muslims support?

          Hint: The same things as the "radical" ones.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            As has been said before:

            Radical Muslim: Worship Allah or I will kill you.
            Moderate Muslim: Worship Allah or my friend here will kill you.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              Actual main-stream Muslim: I think you would be better off if you followed Islam. Same as with actual main-stream Christians, Jews, Buddhists, etc.

              You're just a bigoted piece of trash.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      LoL

    3. Z Crazy   2 months ago

      Theire already fighting the war against us, even against our girls' pussies like the Colonge Sex Attacks showed.

    4. damikesc   2 months ago

      Now tell us more about people who oppose civil rights and how bitching about them won't make them do it more.

  22. Jesse fantasizes about having a 3some with Dave Smith and Maddow   2 months ago

    “Rest in peace, Andrew Wimsatt: He was a superfan of Reason and The Fifth Column, as well as Greg Gutfeld and Kat Timpf”

    I call BS. There’s no way a painfully unfunny hack asshole like Greg Gutfeld has fans.

    1. Nelson   2 months ago

      I don’t think Greg Gutfield is a comedy-based talk show. I think it’s supposed to be Fox for those with short attention spans and insomnia.

      1. Jesse fantasizes about having a 3some with Dave Smith and Maddow   2 months ago

        To be fair I have never watched “Gutfeld” but I used to watch The Five and Red Eye. On The Five it seemed like they tried to make him “the funny one,” and Red Eye was a tongue in cheek comedy news show. The other regulars on Red Eye could be pretty funny, but Gutfeld’s schtick was just insult shock comedy. Watching someone try that and fail at it is really cringy.

      2. damikesc   2 months ago

        Oh, you don't get his jokes either. I am impressed you're willing to admit it.

        1. Jesse fantasizes about having a 3some with Dave Smith and Maddow   2 months ago

          A Bible humping cretin like you would find that hack funny.

        2. Nelson   2 months ago

          I understand what he’s trying for, at least when it seems he’s trying to be funny. He just fails to achieve his goal.

          That said, I don’t think his talk show is tryong to be a humorous talk show.

  23. Jesse fantasizes about having a 3some with Dave Smith and Maddow   2 months ago

    Moved

  24. car-keynes   2 months ago

    Reads like the sort of crime that a man does on his way up in a criminal organization, committing proof of no fear about bloodying his hands nor getting caught nor even flinching if the target may be highly regarded.

    Note I never attempted to name a specific guilty party. Anyone could had put clothes in the displayed person's trashcan. I don't know how that works in broad daylight. It could had been a Flock ad for all I know.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Bloomington, Indiana, Bans Superintelligent AI, Hoping 350 Other Cities Will Follow

Josh Pauzé | 11.10.2026 4:15 PM

Miami Sheriff Hired a Private Law Firm To Pursue—and Profit From—Asset Forfeiture Cases

C.J. Ciaramella | 11.10.2026 3:17 PM

Senate Advances Bipartisan Permitting Bill That Could Unleash Energy Development With Major Caveats

Tosin Akintola | 11.10.2026 2:04 PM

Impeachment Articles Highlight Pete Hegseth's 'Extrajudicial Killings' and His Assault on Free Speech

Jacob Sullum | 11.10.2026 1:45 PM

Massie Is Giving Over 300 Civilian War Dead a Voice In Hegseth's Impeachment

Matthew Petti | 11.10.2026 1:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason

The All-Argentina Issue is Here

New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.

Subscribe & Start Reading Learn More