Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

United Kingdom

The U.K. Wants a Social Media Curfew for 16- and 17-Year-Olds

Tech companies may soon have to comply with yet another U.K. regulation.

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.16.2026 11:06 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Teen girl on a smart phone | Illustration: Vadymvdrobot/Envato
(Illustration: Vadymvdrobot/Envato)

The United Kingdom's crusade against social media is not over. As if a social media ban for children under 16 were not restrictive enough, the U.K. has announced plans to impose a social media curfew for 16- and 17-year-olds. 

On Wednesday, the country's Department for Science, Innovation and Technology unveiled a proposal for default overnight curfews on social media apps between midnight and 6 a.m. The measure would also, by default, switch off features that "serve up personalised content" for the older teenagers. The proposed regulations would still need to be legislated by Parliament and are expected to be enforced next spring. 

According to a press release announcing the proposals, these measures will "help ensure there is no cliff edge in protections as young people move into their later teenage years," since the country's social media ban only covers children under 16. The curfew measures are not as overtly restrictive as the ban, and 16- and 17-year-olds can opt out of the curfew by changing their account settings. Still, the measures represent another overreach of government power into young people's lives. In the U.K., 16-year-olds can consent to sex, drink alcohol in restaurants (with an adult), and join the Royal Navy. But they cannot be trusted, by default, to manage their own social media usage?

"In Scotland, at 16, you can legally move out, get married, work full time, leave education, and enlist, but can't be on your phone when you want," one teen complained to The Guardian. "I'm sorry, but that's stupid."

Others have pointed out the absurdity of the policy, which may not even achieve its stated goals. 

"Either Labour think [sic] 16 & 17 year olds should be on social media or they don't, but curfews they can switch off won't achieve anything," Laura Trott, the Shadow Education Secretary, wrote on X. "Giving 16 year olds the vote while putting them under a social media curfew makes no sense."

The U.K. is proposing other online safety measures in addition to the curfew. The country's technology secretary also intends to "bring forward a package of measures to help children use AI chatbots safely," including "regular breaks for under-18s using chatbots" (it's unclear if such breaks would be encouraged or required) and "working with regulators and across government to address services that provide dangerous, misleading or unverified mental health advice." It says that "ministers will consider all options, including banning chatbots that pose a serious threat to children." 

The U.K. government also plans to bolster "media literacy skills" in schools through an updated National Curriculum and Relationships, Sex, and Health Education classes. These classes will "teach children to navigate new types of technology including artificial intelligence and AI chatbots, identify mis- and disinformation as well as violent and misogynistic content." 

This is perhaps the most chilling part of the proposed measures. Misinformation and disinformation are extremely subjective terms that have regularly been invoked to justify censoring speech (like in the U.S. during COVID-19). Schools have a legitimate interest in teaching students to think critically and seek truth, but the U.K. government is hardly in a position to tell kids how to navigate technology as it continues to propose and implement draconian measures restricting the free flow of information online.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Thomas Massie Sparks a Democratic Civil War Over Israel

Meagan O'Rourke is an associate editor at Reason.

United KingdomSocial MediaTechnologyEnglandCellphonesTeenagersParenting
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (5)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. MWAocdoc   56 minutes ago

    "Tech companies may soon have to comply with yet another U.K. regulation."

    Yet another misleading subtitle. Tech companies do not "have to comply" with any UK regulations - ever. The simple solution for any international tech company to avoid compliance is to make sure that they have no valuable assets to be seized within the jurisdiction of the U.K. socialist dictatorship and ignore any legal commands from them. If the government want to punish teens and their parents for violating curfews and other tech restrictions, let them try.

    Log in to Reply
    1. richardwashby   19 minutes ago

      Amen to that. I wish they would all follow this practice everywhere.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Liberty_Belle   44 minutes ago

    They could try parenting their own kids instead of letting the government stick their noses into it. Also, the government could suddenly decide "hey, let's mind our own business." Either would work, both would be nice.

    Log in to Reply
    1. MWAocdoc   17 minutes ago

      How dare you suggest that subjects of the crown are not in need of constant supervision by His/Her Majesty's Secret Service?!

      Log in to Reply
  3. richardwashby   16 minutes ago

    Some US politicians will soon jump on this bandwagon sooner rather than later despite it's inherent idiocy.

    Coming soon to a state near you. Maybe we should replace 1984 with 2034

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A 22 Percent Social Security Cut Is Coming. Will the Senate Act?

Billy Binion | 7.16.2026 12:25 PM

As the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Hits a 40-Year Low, It's Time To Scrap It

Jeremiah Alondra | 7.16.2026 11:23 AM

The U.K. Wants a Social Media Curfew for 16- and 17-Year-Olds

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.16.2026 11:06 AM

Thomas Massie Sparks a Democratic Civil War Over Israel

Matthew Petti | 7.16.2026 10:23 AM

Iran Used Ad Tracking To Hunt American Soldiers: Report

Matthew Petti | 7.16.2026 9:52 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason