Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

America 250

On America's 250th Birthday, Celebrate Liberty

Most Americans still appreciate the freedom the country was founded upon.

J.D. Tuccille | 7.3.2026 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
The American flag flaps in the breeze at dusk. The dome of the U.S. Capitol is visible in the distance. | Orhan Çam/Dreamstime
(Orhan Çam/Dreamstime)

Nearly half of Americans don't understand what we're celebrating for America's 250th anniversary, according to a new poll. Clearly, the festivities aren't about the quality of the country's public schools, since this year marks 250 years since the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Something else we should be celebrating, though, is this country's continued legacy of individual liberty. Our freedom may be under threat from people who don't appreciate its value both within and outside the country, but it endures with the support—mostly—of Americans themselves.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Americans May Be Historically Ignorant, but We Love Liberty

"Nearly half (46%) of Americans don't know what America's 250th anniversary commemorates," Emily Ekins reports of a national survey of 2,253 Americans by the Cato Institute, conducted in collaboration with Morning Consult. "A little more than half (53%) correctly answered that it was the adoption of the Declaration of Independence."

The survey also contains good news. Asked "which would you most want children to learn from America's 250th anniversary," the most popular answer chosen is "freedom is rare and must be protected."

Prompted to choose "the top core values and ideas that Americans believe define our country," the most popular pick is "freedom and individual rights."

Seventy percent of respondents say the principles of the country's founding remain relevant today.

The answers square with those of a June AP-NORC poll which found majorities agreeing that the right to vote, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to keep and bear arms are "extremely" or "very" "important to the United States' identity as a nation."

Much is made of popular dissatisfaction with the country's direction and some Americans' lack of enthusiasm for this country—or situational enthusiasm that only comes into to play when their political tribe is in power. And that gloom is sad and concerning. But it's clear that many of us still value the liberty that lies at the core of this country's founding philosophy.

The Country's Strong Protections for Individual Liberty Carry On

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness," Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence that we celebrate on Independence Day.

Decades later, in an 1819 letter, Jefferson emphasized that "rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will, within the limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law'; because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual."

Contrast this celebration of liberty over law with the tepid wording of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms which "guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."

Any curb on liberty can be justified by a motivated government official. Ultimately, a promise of freedom within laws that are shaped and changed to suit political fashions is no guarantee at all.

And that's what most of the world lives with: no guarantee of freedom. In its most recent annual report, Freedom House noted, "global freedom declined for the 20th consecutive year in 2025."

The United States lost ground in that report, as did so many other countries. But the U.S. remains a haven for free speech even as other nominally liberal democratic countries—most of Europe, for example—abandon the whole idea of discourse unmanaged by the state.

Americans are far from immune to the growth of government and corresponding erosion of freedom around the world. But a majority of Americans still hold dear the value of individual liberty, and that helps keep the reality alive, though constantly under threat.

A Troubling Strain of Tolerance for Authoritarianism

That said, the Cato/Morning Consult survey offered some more troubling news. According to Ekins, "four in 10 Americans think it's acceptable if a president they support stretched the Constitution to get what they want" and "a quarter (25%) say the Constitution should be interpreted more flexibly so government can act more decisively and quickly to solve problems."

Restrictions on the presidency and government in general are features of protection for liberty. We bypass them at our peril.

Even more troubling is that while respondents viewed capitalism more favorably than socialism, at 52–37 percent, "Gen Z stands out for having more people who like socialism (53%) than capitalism (45%). More than a third of Americans under 30 (38%) say they have a favorable view of communism."

Based as it is on voluntary transactions and individual choices, capitalism is the economic face of freedom. Neither socialism nor its openly totalitarian expression in communism are compatible with liberty. That they're gaining ground with younger Americans is reason for concern. This provides further support for the Cato survey's finding that "nearly 6 in 10 believe the country has moved away from the founding principles, and 56% worry the US could stop being a free country within the next 50 years."

Celebrate Liberty While You Can

Americans are right to worry about the future of freedom given its global erosion, and younger Americans' growing taste for state-dominated systems of total control. But the fact that most Americans do worry about the prospects for liberty means that the country retains a core appreciation of its founding principles. Liberty can only survive if it's valued, and it is.

"Freedom is a fragile thing and it's never more than one generation away from extinction," then-California Gov. Ronald Reagan cautioned in 1967.

Freedom remains besieged in the world at large and here at home. But it's still an idea valued and practiced by a majority of Americans. On this 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States, that's worth celebrating.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Review: Gore Vidal's Burr Is the Anti-Hamilton

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

America 250FreedomLibertyUnited States4th of JulyPollsAmerican Revolution
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (30)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

    we were not founded on Freedom but on Freedom for Virtue.This is Libertarian re-writing.

    John Adams: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    "Benjamin Franklin: "Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.

    "George Washington: "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports.

    "Samuel Adams: "Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally corrupt."

    FREEDOM AS YOU HAVE IT IS THE BLOODBATH OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION.

    1. MasterThief   2 months ago

      Freedom absent morality results in evil. The libertines support evil and destruction as they seek short term satisfaction

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        Moral dictation =/= freedom.
        Yes. People have to be honorable; that doesn't equate to morality.

        1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

          well not stealing doesn't equate to honesty but you are definitely not honest IF YOU STEAL. So you make a non-point. It doesn't equate to morality, amorality, immorality. Because it is what they call in philosophy a pre-condition

      2. damikesc   2 months ago

        Indeed. 100% true.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        ….. and now we have communist democrats.

      4. IceTrey   2 months ago

        The only objectively immoral actions are those involving coercion. So as long as they don't do that who cares what they do? Do you believe in liberty (freedom from coercion) or not?

  2. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    Consider the question.
    A) WORK for what you get?
    B) Direct others (Gov) to STEAL what you get?

    "Gen Z stands out for having more people who like socialism (53%) more than capitalism (45%)."

    Allowing [D]emocratic Crime against others is no different than the biggest (Gov-Level) Al'Capone gang a nation will ever see.

    STEALING (Gov-Guns) doesn't make sh*T.
    The 'Ends' are always the same. A poverty ridden nation of crime run amuck.

    Democrats might think they're just trying to make their lives better by supporting Gov-Theft but the result is (by every law of nature) they're just making themselves poorer by drying out their zero-sum (Again; 'Guns' don't make sh*T) assets.

    The USA is NOT a 'democracy'. It is a Constitutional Republic. A Constitution that has no authority for STEALING from those 'icky' people for your UN-earned benefit just because you Identify-as 'poor'.

    1. CE   2 months ago

      Gen Z starts by assuming that no one could earn a billion dollars without exploiting someone, so it's okay to steal from billionaires. Then they go gaga over Taylor Swift's billionaire wedding.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        Just one excuse on a long list of endless excuses to commit crimes against their fellow man.
        They don't seem to care that the billion is just the evaluated asset required to produce.
        Which is the worst part. They're literally eating their own production pipeline.
        Conquer and Consume until there is nothing left.

  3. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

    God Bless America, the greatest gift mankind has received from itself in all of history.

  4. IceTrey   2 months ago

    We don't have liberty. Our government is coercive. That is it initiates force against the people which is tyranny. To truly have liberty we must prohibit government coercion.

    1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      Yeah, right 🙂 by a lack of coercion we will prohibit (??) government coercion. You have committted word murder and idea-cide

      1. IceTrey   2 months ago

        Coercion is prohibited by deterrence or retaliatory force.

    2. CE   2 months ago

      The USA was founded on the the ideas of individual liberty and limited Constitutional government. And now we have the largest, most powerful, and most expensive government in human history.

      An American citizen earning the median salary (64K USD) pays a marginal income tax rate of 22%, on top of FICA withholding rate of 7.65%, and in addition to state income taxes, property taxes, and sales taxes, and various other federal excise taxes. The Egyptian pharaohs only took 20%.

      And most American voters seem fine with that, and with spending the country into 39.4 trillion dollars of debt, over 112,000 USD per person.

      Hopefully the Spirit of '76 gets rekindled somehow on the semiquincentennial tomorrow. We're going broke if it doesn't.

    3. WellRedMan   2 months ago

      Indeed, and the only way to prohibit government coercion is to make the government so small it has virtually no coercive power. Liberty cannot coexist with big government. Period.

      1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

        This was what I think every Founder disagreed with you on. The Articles of Confederation had virtually no coercive power and that almost destroyed America. You couldn't raise troops, you couldn't raise money to pay them,there was no ability to respond to a horrible problem that sprang up (and our enemies knew that)

        I think your position really is that government is a necessary evil. But the Philosophia Perennis is that it is a good.

        1. IceTrey   2 months ago

          If we believe in liberty why do we have any enemies?

      2. IceTrey   2 months ago

        I would start with a 28th amendment, "Government coercion is prohibited.", and go from there.

  5. Mike Hansberry   2 months ago

    "On America's 250th Birthday, Celebrate Liberty." Hey, don't tell me what to do! Kidding aside, good article.

    The hope for our continued liberty is that our love of freedom, and loathing for being told what to do, will lead to a self-correction should some portion of the electorate become overly enamored with collectivism. This might be the case even without a widespread knowledge of the country's history, but to be on the safe side, we ought to push for civics to be taught in school so that the result on that graph improves in the future.

    1. CE   2 months ago

      A portion of the electorate is already enamored with collectivism. Fortunately the worst of the damage will be concentrated in socialist enclaves like New York, San Francisco, and Seattle, and the rest of the nation will have real world examples of political failure that even the densest progressives can't deny.

  6. CE   2 months ago

    Young Americans are more ignorant of history than ever before. They've been indoctrinated into the idea that America is uniquely bad, founded on slavery and built on stolen land, with capitalist robber barons free to exploit everyone.

    Slavery was not unique to America, not practiced throughout the country, and abolished just 76 years after George Washington took office as the first President.

    The USA probably has a lower percentage of stolen land than almost any other country. Manhattan was purchased from the Lenape (Delaware) people. The Louisiana Territory (over a fourth of the nation) was purchased from France. Alaska (over one-sixth of the nation) was purchased from Russia. The Gadsden Purchase added more land in southern Arizona and New Mexico.

    Capitalism and freedom have allowed the USA to prosper like no other nation before or since. Businesses become profitable by providing goods and services that people want at prices they are willing to pay, employing millions in jobs they freely chose at the salaries paid. Only excessive government can exploit people, so replacing free market capitalism with socialism would be a grave mistake.

    1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

      Deserves a repeat "Only excessive government can exploit people".
      ...because government is the only legal 'Gun' threat.
      It's the only thing that separates government from other entities.

      That threat is suppose to *defend* people against unjust aggression.
      Not to be that unjust aggression.

  7. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'To the best of your knowledge, which of the following best describes what America's 250th anniversary commemorates?'

    Now if only we had a few questions like this in voting booths, and then weighted votes accordingly.

  8. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Americans May Be Historically Ignorant, but We Love Liberty'

    Yeah, if you define "liberty" as freedom from responsibility and freedom from other people being mean and making us sad.

    Which obviously means liberty for the select tribe, and none for the deplorables.

  9. WellRedMan   2 months ago

    Liberty and freedom are not the same thing. As Ludwig von Mises says, "liberty is always freedom from government" and thus liberty cannot co-exist with big government. The author is speaking of freedoms and not liberty. Americans actually have neither because without liberty freedoms are simply privileges.

  10. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

    Worth reading:

    https://im1776.com/2026/07/03/an-american-250/

  11. minus the clever name   2 months ago

    Mises is a loser IF YOU DARE TO LOOK AT THE FACTS

    Mises recognized that Austrian order and Catholic order would always be at odds. “A living Christianity,” said Mises, “cannot exist side by side with, and within, Capitalism” (Quoted in Jorg Guido Hulsmann, Mises, the Last Knight of Liberalism, p. 982). Later in his career, Mises would allow that Christianity could exist within capitalism, but only if the Christians kept their opinions to themselves, only if they were marginalized and kept apart from the political and economic orders

    Mises’s antipathy towards Christianity begins with his disdain for its founder.

    [Jesus] rejects everything that exists without offering anything to replace it. He arrives at dissolving all existing social ties…. The motive force behind the purity and power of this complete negation is ecstatic inspiration and enthusiastic hope of a new world. Hence his passionate attack upon everything that exists. Everything may be destroyed because God in His omnipotence will rebuild the future order…. The clearest modern parallel to the attitude of complete negation of primitive Christianity is Bolshevism. (Socialism, p. 413)

    FOR PEOPLE SO IN THE DARK THAT A MATCH IS A BLESSING , THERE IS MISES. But if you have any sense and don't make Economics or Politics (or Mises!!) your God he is a loser by and large.

    85% of the world's population lives under a government restricting religiouis freedom says PEW RESEARCH...my take has been for years that the chief obstacle to progress in the world is liberals, atheists, and free-thinkers who don't care that a person sincerely following their conscience in Uganda or Nigeria is a target for killing.

    1. Torguud   2 months ago

      Mises is God? Cool.

  12. Rob Misek   2 months ago

    On Americas 250th birthday you can recognize that every president has been led by the nose or murdered by genocidal jooos.

    It’s only taken 250 years to wake up.

    Happy fucking birthday.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How St. Paul's Rent Control Experiment Backfired Spectacularly

John Stossel | 9.2.2026 6:11 PM

Mamdani Wants To Block a Law Giving Teachers' Aides $10,000 Bonuses. The Teachers Union Is Not Happy.

Meagan O'Rourke | 9.2.2026 5:06 PM

Prosecutors Say a North Carolina Teenager Committed Murder by Livestreaming a California Mosque Shooting

Jacob Sullum | 9.2.2026 4:55 PM

USDA Approves Bioengineered American Chestnut Tree That Could Bring Them Back From Near-Extinction

Ronald Bailey | 9.2.2026 3:30 PM

Trump Is Back To Seeking Regime Change in Iran

Matthew Petti | 9.2.2026 2:55 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason