Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

James Talarico Regrets Going Full Woke

Also, can Stephen and Katie Miller stop whining?

Robby Soave | 5.28.2026 12:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
James Talarico | Bob Daemmrich/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
James Talarico (Bob Daemmrich/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

With the backlash to wokeness in full swing, it was probably inevitable that some political figures would come to regret the things they said and tweeted back when progressive cultural signaling felt necessary, roughly from 2014 to 2024. Republicans are out to destroy James Talarico, the Democratic candidate for Texas's Senate seat, by resurfacing his most eye roll inducing takes from that time period, like when he said god was "non-binary" or when he promised to run a "non-meat" campaign in Texas in order to fight climate change. (For good measure, he was wearing a COVID-19 mask; this was in April 2022.)

Talarico now says he wishes he hadn't phrased those things like that.

"There are some statements that I've made that I certainly regret," he told CBS News. "Ken Paxton is intentionally clipping my cringey comments to distract from his career of corruption."

Talarico's acknowledgement that the comments were indeed cringey speaks volumes. We have come a long way since the woke era, during which even Republicans were at pains to disassociate themselves from the perception that they were culturally conservative. (In 2015, former Sen. Rick Santorum (R–Pa.) proudly declared that Caitlyn Jenner was a woman if she said she was a woman.) The idea was to signal understanding and conscientiousness.

You are reading Free Media from Robby Soave and Reason. Get more of Robby's on-the-media, disinformation, and free speech coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Today, conscientiousness in politics is lame, and both parties want to signal the exact opposite: that they're mean bullies. See numerous Republicans mocking Talarico's appearance and mannerism, either implying or outright asserting that he's unmanly, feminine, or possibly gay. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller referred to Talarico as Texas' "first transgender candidate," which was some kind of dig at his appearance. In response, the Democrats X account replied: "shut up you ugly fuck."

That comment attracted some pearl clutching from numerous conservatives, including podcaster Katie Miller, who is Stephen Miller's wife. I understand her defending her man…but if you dish it out you should be able to take it. You can't be constantly screaming about how Democrats are all unmanly freaks and then get super upset when they punch back and call you ugly.

Katie Miller has actually gone even further, unmasking the Democratic staffer behind the X post and trying to make fun of her and get her in trouble.

Paulina Mangubat is who runs @TheDemocrats account. She's 30, unmarried with no kids.

Put your name on it next time.

This is what a sad, unhappy, female Liberal looks like. It's why Pew reports 50% of them have been diagnosed with a mental condition. https://t.co/qLeIVQZtSf pic.twitter.com/xpGQzRLyfg

— Katie Miller (@KatieMiller) May 27, 2026

For good measure, she went on Fox News to do even more complaining about the mean X post, and suggested that making fun of her husband is somehow connected to anti-Trump violence like the attempted White House Correspondents Association dinner shooting. The Millers seem to take the position that their side can be as vicious as they want, and if the other side responds, it's akin to violence.

Almost makes you miss the woke era, huh?


This Week on Free Media

I'm joined by Amber Duke to discuss Spencer Pratt's mayoral campaign in Los Angeles, the pope's views on AI, and New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's threats toward supposedly negligent landlords.


Worth Watching

I am very much not a horror movies guy, but I have a soft spot for found-footage style films. I loved Cloverfield and Chronicle in particular. Thus I'm somewhat interested in seeing Backrooms, which has just come out. The trailer was sufficiently intriguing that I went back and watched some of the web series that inspired the film. Very cool and creepy.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: New York Legislators Seek Broader Anti-Shackling Protections Following Courtroom Birth in Brooklyn

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

PoliticsMedia CriticismTrump AdministrationSocial MediaMidtermCampaigns/ElectionsTexasCulture War
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (14)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. minus the clever name   1 hour ago

    Talarico is a hateful stupid fool in the Beto O'Rourke tradition.
    Hope lightning scorches his ass from above for saying the Bible is not anti-abortion !!! It intensely anti-abortion.

    Jeremiah 1:5: "Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I dedicated you, a prophet to the nations I appointed you."

    Psalm 139:13-15: "You formed my inmost being; you knit me in my mother’s womb. I praise you, because I am wonderfully made... My frame was not hidden from you, when I was made in secret, as crafted in the depths of the earth."

    Psalm 22:10-11: "On you I was cast from my birth; you have been my God from my mother's womb."

    Luke 1:41: "When Elizabeth heard Mary’s greeting, the infant leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth, filled with the holy Spirit..."

    ======================
    And the Church Fathers are vehement on it

    The Early Church Fathers uniformly and explicitly condemned abortion. Standing in stark contrast to the surrounding Roman and Greek cultures—which practiced abortion and infanticide—early Christian writers viewed the fetus as a human life under God's care, classifying procured abortion as equivalent to murder.
    The condemnation of abortion was heavily documented throughout the foundational centuries of the Church:

    • The Didache (c. A.D. 70–100): One of the earliest Christian documents outside the New Testament states, "You shall not procure an abortion, nor destroy a newborn child".

    • Tertullian (c. A.D. 160–220): In his Apology, he wrote that "murder is forbidden once for all" and therefore "it is not permitted to destroy the fetus in the womb."

    • Athenagoras (c. A.D. 177): The Athenian philosopher explicitly declared that women who use abortifacients commit murder and must give an account to God.

    • Basil the Great (c. A.D. 330–379): St. Basil ruled in his canonical letters that any woman who purposely destroys her unborn child is guilty of murder.

    • Augustine of Hippo (A.D. 354–430): While early philosophical debates in the Church sometimes focused on the exact moment the soul entered the body (or biological "ensoulment"), Augustine condemned the act entirely. He famously wrote against allowing "even the beginning of life" to be denied or destroyed.

    Log in to Reply
    1. damikesc   50 minutes ago

      Yeah, ANYBODY who claims the Bible is not anti-abortion is not a Christian in any way, shape, or form. This is not even close to a debatable point.

      He is a blasphemer. Time for Christians to take this sort of thing seriously.

      Log in to Reply
    2. Liberty_Belle   3 minutes ago

      Here we go again.

      There is exactly ONE PLACE in the whole bible about abortion and it reads like a voodoo ritual that induces miscarriage via bacterial poisoning or some such nonsense. ( Numbers 5:11-31 )

      Log in to Reply
    3. Leo Kovalensky II   2 minutes ago

      God preferred killing babies after they were born (Exodus 12), turning women into salt for disobeying (Genesis 19:26), and committing Genocide against people from Amalek (Exodus 17).

      God was clearly pro-life, well, at least in God 2.0 form when he would have turned the other cheek on those previous atrocities he condoned.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Agammamon   46 minutes ago

    >from that time period

    Is this an attempt to rehabilitate the dude? It's the most recent decade of a fully grown man's life. Either he believes that stuff - justifying Republicans 'pouncing' - or he said it grift - in which case even Democrats should shin him.

    There is no win here Soave, you can not make the guy sound 'centrist' in order to justify 'reluctant, but strategically'.

    Log in to Reply
  3. MWAocdoc   44 minutes ago

    "The idea was to signal understanding and conscientiousness."

    The issue here is not so much that politicians signal attitudes instead of stating clear policy positions based on rational and coherent governmental principles. The real problem is that the two party death-grip on the election system necessitates superficial soundbites and that it actually seems to work on the electorate when they cast their votes. Image seems to be far more important in the election process than substance, much to the detriment of public affairs and, especially, the principles of liberty and inalienable rights in America.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   31 minutes ago

      "...The real problem is that the two party death-grip on the election system necessitates superficial soundbites and that it actually seems to work on the electorate when they cast their votes..."

      Imagine having an 'intellect' so infantile that you are incapable of selecting "better" from "worse".
      Well, you'd be as imbecilic as MWAocdoc!

      Log in to Reply
  4. Agammamon   44 minutes ago

    '>We have come a long way since the woke era

    It's not even been two fucking years!

    The fuck is this shit. Woke was shot when Trump was elected. It's so recent the guy hasn't even stopped crying for medical care yet.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Agammamon   41 minutes ago

    >The Millers seem to take the position that their side can be as vicious as they want, and if the other side responds, it's akin to violence.

    Almost makes you miss the woke era, huh?

    Did you spend the last two decades on Planet Gay and so missed everything that happened here on earth?

    Log in to Reply
  6. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   34 minutes ago

    "...Talarico now says he wishes he hadn't phrased those things like that..."

    No, it's not the "phrasing", dipshit.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Leo Kovalensky II   20 minutes ago

    "Now that I'm in the general election, I regret everything I did in order to win my primary."
    - James Talarico, basically

    Log in to Reply
  8. MollyGodiva   14 minutes ago

    The only backlash to woke is by white nationalist MAGA bigot shits.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Leo Kovalensky II   8 minutes ago

      False

      Anybody that cares about freedom of speech and freedom of association cares about the woke nonsense of "do what government says or you don't get any money" that was pushed on schools and government contractors. That's hardly a MAGA position.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Liberty_Belle   10 seconds ago

        Hardly a MAGA position ?

        https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/trump-administration-freezes-2-2-billion-in-grants-to-harvard-university-over-campus-activism

        Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

James Talarico Regrets Going Full Woke

Robby Soave | 5.28.2026 12:50 PM

New York Legislators Seek Broader Anti-Shackling Protections Following Courtroom Birth in Brooklyn

Meagan O'Rourke | 5.28.2026 12:36 PM

Thomas and Alito Take a Regrettable Position in a Qualified Immunity Case

Damon Root | 5.28.2026 11:50 AM

Stop Giving Property Tax Breaks to Senior Citizens

Eric Boehm | 5.28.2026 11:30 AM

Leaked Plans Show School Buses Could Become Roaming Surveillance Vehicles

Autumn Billings | 5.28.2026 9:46 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks