Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Innovation

Polo Officials Ban Genetically Enhanced Ponies To Save 'the Magic of Breeding'

(Don't) hold your genetically enhanced horses.

Ronald Bailey | From the May 2026 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
An illustration of a horse as a DNA strand | Illustration: Joanna Andreasson Source images: iStock
(Illustration: Joanna Andreasson Source images: iStock)

"Gene doping represents a threat to the integrity of sport," asserts the World Anti-Doping Agency, which prohibits athletes from "the non-therapeutic use of genes, genetic elements and/or cells that have the capacity to enhance athletic performance." The agency also bans gene editing.

Even if genetic enhancements remain unjustifiably prohibited to elite human athletes, should a ban on gene doping also apply to animals that compete in sports? The International Equestrian Federation says yes. "The use on, or administration or application to, any Horse of Gene Editing or Genome Editing is prohibited at all times."

The Argentine Polo Association (APA) agrees: It has imposed a ban on the world's first genetically enhanced polo ponies. "The use of genetically manipulated or edited horses will not be permitted by the APA for polo, in any official or unofficial tournament," declared the organization.

The banned horses were bred by Buenos Aires–based Kheiron Biotech, a leader in horse cloning that produced about 400 clones in 2025. Researchers at the company edited five clones of the award-winning mare Polo Pureza ("Polo Purity" in English) to suppress the myostatin gene, which normally limits muscle growth. The goal was to breed horses with stronger muscles and more explosive speed.

"This takes away the charm, this takes away the magic of breeding," APA President Benjamin Araya told Reuters. Yet biotech has been shaping the breeding "magic" of Argentine polo ponies for years. More than 60 percent of Argentine polo horses are now produced by embryo transfer, in which embryos are flushed from high-value mares and implanted in surrogate broodmares. This process enables mares to keep competing while producing multiple foals each year without carrying the pregnancy themselves.

As a result of this artificial fecundity, sought-after Argentine polo horses are widely exported, with around 2,400 sold abroad last year.

In 2012, the International Equestrian Federation lifted its ban on cloned horses and their offspring in sanctioned competitions. Argentine polo legend Adolfo Cambiaso was among the first to take advantage of this technology; his team famously won a match in which he rode six different clones of his favorite mare, Dolfina Cuartetera.

Evidently, cloning poses no threat to the integrity of polo.

Sports rules are ultimately arbitrary and can be adjusted to accommodate scientific advances while maintaining transparency and fair play. The Argentine Polo Pony Breeders Association plans to monitor the progress of enhanced clones for the next four or five years before deciding whether they can be officially registered as polo ponies.

The best way for sports officials to reduce potential harm—to humans or to horses—from using enhancements is to bring their use out of the shadows, allowing them to occur with medical oversight and sound research.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Why the Federal Government Can't Charge Anyone With 'Domestic Terrorism'

Ronald Bailey is science correspondent at Reason.

InnovationScienceGenetic EngineeringGeneticsSportsAnimalsCloningArgentina
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (8)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. MasterThief   3 weeks ago

    Ron's arguments lead us to Brave New World. Unfortunately, I think that is exactly what he wants.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Mickey Rat   3 weeks ago

      Oh, what Ron wants is probably closer to Gattaca than Brave New World.

      Log in to Reply
      1. MasterThief   3 weeks ago

        I think he would take either, but you have s fair point.

        Log in to Reply
      2. mad.casual   3 weeks ago

        Pretty sure he *doesn't* want a David Cronenberg vs. Rob Bottin-style polo match.

        If we could keep it contained, I'm about 50/50.

        Like one side is a horse with huge bat wings and it's got 4 or so polo sticks that are extensions of it's skeleton, a ring of eyes around it's head to see in all directions. The other side is like a more nimble, spider-like creature that runs around on polo sticks that doesn't have as many eyes, but it can simply retract its head and invert itself internally to "turn around" rather than having to run or fly over sweeping arcs.

        Log in to Reply
  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   3 weeks ago

    MORE TESTING NEEDED.

    Log in to Reply
  3. vampire flames   3 weeks ago

    Here is the farmboy become attorney explanation. You breed your herd for the best offspring, disease resistance, weight, etc.
    You have to pay for the best stock, thus more expense.
    A genetically superior horse at birth comes with a known best product, no need to go through the hit or miss product at your expense.
    This genetic method cuts out the profit for the breeding stock owner, thus people with less money can get into the games.
    The Milton Friedman free market solution.

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   3 weeks ago

      I don't think you worked on a farm or are an attorney. I suspect you're one of our regular retards like windycityattorney (who also probably doesn't live in Chicago) using a sock.

      If you think cloning a horse is easier and cheaper than just breeding a horse, you're retarded. If you think genetically engineering *and then cloning* a horse is cheaper than breeding a horse you're doubly retarded. The cloning and genetic engineering are more reliable. But if you think genetic engineers and cloners are going to say, "We're going to charge you less per horse because of all the savings we want to give you to avoid having to breed your way through dozens of horses to get the exact, bespoke horse you want. Go, win a bunch of championships with your below-cost, bespoke horse. We don't want to make money. We just love to genetically modify horses." you're a retard thrice over.

      Until all the horses are genetically modified and cloned, natrual or managed husbandry will still be the starting, if not top, bid price and it's stupid to pretend otherwise.

      GTFO you "We take a loss on every horse but we'll make it up on volume!" moron.

      Log in to Reply
  4. CE   3 weeks ago

    What about robot horses?

    In case anyone missed this, a robot broke the human half-marathon record recently:

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/a-humanoid-robot-beat-the-human-half-marathon-record-at-a-beijing-race-but-what-did-it-actually-prove/

    To answer SA's question, it proves we can't outrun them now.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Pennsylvania Family Says the DEA Battered Down Their Door While Raiding the Wrong Home

Meagan O'Rourke | 5.19.2026 3:28 PM

The Congressional Black Caucus Opposes a College Sports Bill Because of Gerrymandering

Jason Russell | 5.19.2026 12:30 PM

Trump Settles His Own Lawsuit Against the IRS for $1.8 Billion of Your Money

Joe Lancaster | 5.19.2026 12:15 PM

Filming Cops Is a First Amendment Right. The Feds Keep Harassing People for It Anyway.

Jacob Sullum | 5.19.2026 12:00 PM

What I Learned Shadowing California's Katana-Wielding Anti-Squatter Enforcers

Christian Britschgi | 5.19.2026 10:35 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks