Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Innovation

Polo Officials Ban Genetically Enhanced Ponies To Save 'the Magic of Breeding'

(Don't) hold your genetically enhanced horses.

Ronald Bailey | From the May 2026 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
An illustration of a horse as a DNA strand | Illustration: Joanna Andreasson Source images: iStock
(Illustration: Joanna Andreasson Source images: iStock)

"Gene doping represents a threat to the integrity of sport," asserts the World Anti-Doping Agency, which prohibits athletes from "the non-therapeutic use of genes, genetic elements and/or cells that have the capacity to enhance athletic performance." The agency also bans gene editing.

Even if genetic enhancements remain unjustifiably prohibited to elite human athletes, should a ban on gene doping also apply to animals that compete in sports? The International Equestrian Federation says yes. "The use on, or administration or application to, any Horse of Gene Editing or Genome Editing is prohibited at all times."

The Argentine Polo Association (APA) agrees: It has imposed a ban on the world's first genetically enhanced polo ponies. "The use of genetically manipulated or edited horses will not be permitted by the APA for polo, in any official or unofficial tournament," declared the organization.

The banned horses were bred by Buenos Aires–based Kheiron Biotech, a leader in horse cloning that produced about 400 clones in 2025. Researchers at the company edited five clones of the award-winning mare Polo Pureza ("Polo Purity" in English) to suppress the myostatin gene, which normally limits muscle growth. The goal was to breed horses with stronger muscles and more explosive speed.

"This takes away the charm, this takes away the magic of breeding," APA President Benjamin Araya told Reuters. Yet biotech has been shaping the breeding "magic" of Argentine polo ponies for years. More than 60 percent of Argentine polo horses are now produced by embryo transfer, in which embryos are flushed from high-value mares and implanted in surrogate broodmares. This process enables mares to keep competing while producing multiple foals each year without carrying the pregnancy themselves.

As a result of this artificial fecundity, sought-after Argentine polo horses are widely exported, with around 2,400 sold abroad last year.

In 2012, the International Equestrian Federation lifted its ban on cloned horses and their offspring in sanctioned competitions. Argentine polo legend Adolfo Cambiaso was among the first to take advantage of this technology; his team famously won a match in which he rode six different clones of his favorite mare, Dolfina Cuartetera.

Evidently, cloning poses no threat to the integrity of polo.

Sports rules are ultimately arbitrary and can be adjusted to accommodate scientific advances while maintaining transparency and fair play. The Argentine Polo Pony Breeders Association plans to monitor the progress of enhanced clones for the next four or five years before deciding whether they can be officially registered as polo ponies.

The best way for sports officials to reduce potential harm—to humans or to horses—from using enhancements is to bring their use out of the shadows, allowing them to occur with medical oversight and sound research.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Why the Federal Government Can't Charge Anyone With 'Domestic Terrorism'

Ronald Bailey is science correspondent at Reason.

InnovationScienceGenetic EngineeringGeneticsSportsAnimalsCloningArgentina
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (8)

Latest

Research Suggests Trump and His Opponents Are Both Wrong About the Impact of Voter ID Requirements

Jacob Sullum | 7.20.2026 5:25 PM

South Carolina Law Prohibits Tattoo Parlors Near Churches. A New Lawsuit Calls That Unconstitutional.

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.20.2026 4:59 PM

Britain's New Prime Minister Andy Burnham Promises 'Stronger Public Control' of Stagnating Economy

Reem Ibrahim | 7.20.2026 2:16 PM

A Man Died of COVID at This California Detention Center. A Judge Just Ordered Sweeping Improvements There.

C.J. Ciaramella | 7.20.2026 1:35 PM

The Iran War Is Back, Sort Of

Matthew Petti | 7.20.2026 1:21 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason