Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Media Criticism

Did the Media Miss the Eric Swalwell Story?

Seems weird no one reported on the numerous sexual misconduct allegations in 2020.

Robby Soave | 4.16.2026 3:55 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Eric Swalwell | JOSÉ LUIS VILLEGAS/TNS/Newscom
Eric Swalwell (JOSÉ LUIS VILLEGAS/TNS/Newscom)

Last week, former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D–Calif.) was a high-profile member of Congress (the sort of anti-Trump #Resistance figure who appeared regularly on MSNOW) and the leading Democratic candidate to be the next governor of California. Today, he's a disgraced ex-candidate and ex-congressman.

You are reading Free Media from Robby Soave and Reason. Get more of Robby's on-the-media, disinformation, and free speech coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Swalwell has quit both jobs following numerous sexual misconduct claims reported on by the San Francisco Chronicle and also CNN. Five women have alleged varying levels of improper behavior: The most serious accusation, made by Lonna Drewes, involves rape. She says that Swalwell lured her to his hotel room and choked her while sexually assaulting her. For his part, Swalwell has tacitly confessed to infidelity but denies that he forced himself on anyone.

"These accusations of sexual assault are flat false," he said. "I will fight them with everything I have."

Given all this, Swalwell's resignation seems appropriate, though I would remind everyone that it is difficult to parse the truth of sexual misconduct accusations that surface years after the fact. Alleged victims deserve to be heard and respected, not automatically believed. Numerous men in politics have been accused of long-ago misdeeds that are impossible to properly vet and therefore mostly ignored—including former President Joe Biden, whose campaign was hardly derailed by an accusation from ex-staffer Tara Reade 30 years after the fact.

Moreover, Swalwell's exit from Congress was prompted by the fact that his colleagues had planned to expel him over the allegations. While it's hardly a tragedy when politicians lose their jobs (I'm all in favor of throw the bums out!), I am very reluctant to endorse the idea that a congressman should be tossed over unproven accusations contrary to basic norms of fairness and due process. Swalwell's constituents chose him to be their guy, and I generally think that it's the voters' responsibility to decide who represents them in Congress, not other legislators.

I say that as someone who finds Swalwell a fairly ridiculous and gullible political figure and a terrible choice for governor of California. The good news for Democrats is that they have numerous other choices: far-left billionaire Tom Steyer, former Rep. Katie Porter (who is herself accused of some nasty behavior), the comparatively moderate San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, and others. The bad news for Democrats is that currently the two highest polling candidates are both Republicans, which could actually result in the Democrats getting shut out of the general election. Additional consolidation is clearly necessary.

Which brings me to my next question, and one I've seen various conservatives asking on social media this week: Why now? At first blush, it does seem rather strange that the accusations against Swalwell would take so long to come out. CNN's Brian Stelter described the Swalwell story as a "testament to the power of investigative reporting," and there's some truth to that. The Chronicle and CNN reporters did a great job, but still. Swalwell has been a major national Democratic figure for years. He even ran for president in 2020!

Eric Swalwell ending his bid for California governor is, among other things, a testament to the power of investigative reporting pic.twitter.com/4xzUg944dt

— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) April 13, 2026

Additionally, he's been a constant fixture on progressive and mainstream media programs. Per usual, now that the story is out there, one encounters all sorts of Democratic staffers, politicos, and media figures whispering that they had heard the gossip about him for years. It takes a lot of work for a media reporter to hit publish on a story that contains such weighty accusations, but I find it strange that no one tried back in 2020, particularly with #MeToo still being a major topic of interest for the media at the time.

That said, conservatives inclined to complain about this might consider whether their own media institutions also missed the story. After all, there was nothing stopping them from digging into it, but that means investing in real reporting talent, not just clickbait and hot takes.


This Week on Free Media

I discuss Swalwell's exit with Amber Duke. Also, on Freed Up, Christian Britschgi challenges me to guess: death metal album or military operation? Play along!


Worth Watching

I finished Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, which I did not enjoy, and have returned to Agatha Christie's Miss Marple series. Next up: Pocketful of Rye.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Pete Hegseth's Pulp Fiction Prayer Isn't the First Time He's Used Religion To Justify Illegal War in Iran

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Media CriticismCongressCaliforniaElectionsMediaPolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (16)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Bubba Jones   3 hours ago

    Simple answer. No Democrat is going to give Fox News a scalp.

    Something about presidential kneepads.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Stupid Government Tricks   3 hours ago

      Doesn't answer the question. If his nastiness was common knowledge among staffers, some right-wing outlet would have picked up on them. Democrats haven't perfected the art of silencing lips of drunken staffers.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Rick James   2 hours ago

        If his nastiness was common knowledge among staffers, some right-wing outlet would have picked up on them.

        Not necessarily. I'm not going to paint the "right wing outlets" as being more morally grounded, but what I will say is that when it comes to stuff like years-old vague accusations of "We were drunk, therefore I didn't consent" type of things, there's a pretty solid memory of ridiculous, unfounded witch-hunt type of stuff they've all seen before and even though their instinct is to 'kill', they sometimes won't plunge the knife in.

        Joe Biden is an example. Back when my feed was more diverse and I would occasionally watch both left-leaning AND right... "maga-coded" right wing media, even the 'maga-coded' media was skeptical of the accusations against Biden from what's her name, because they were super-old, conveniently timed and smacked of all the other old, conveniently timed accusations about some certain supreme court judges which were entirely implausible. Their main focus was not the accusations, but WHY the #MeToo aligned media was largely uninterested in them.

        Log in to Reply
        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 hours ago

          Dont tell STG, but this is the exact same argument being used by dem led corporate media to try to blame right wing outlets.

          The fact is those same outlets exposed the fang fang issue. There were multiple stories in breitbart that hinted at it, but democrats refused to go on record. So blame right wing media? Thats a pretty fun bout of blame pointing.

          And just look at how many people threatened to sue over the story release. After trump was found guilty multiple times in court by liberal juries over ridiculous claims, who would risk it?

          There is a reason that this news rag and corporate media highlighted the 1.5B Alex Jones suit. The voting machine suits against Tucker and fox. All celebrated. Now its why didn't they report a story democrats wouldn't confirm?? STG doesnt think through his own arguments.

          They have done the same woth Gallego, where evidence they could publish does exist.

          Maybe STG is asking for right wing media to go to tried and true "people familiar with the subject" or "anonymous sources" say like in the attacks they make on conservatives?

          Log in to Reply
      2. Rick James   2 hours ago

        Democrats haven't perfected the art of silencing lips of drunken staffers.

        We'll see what happens when Pelosi is completely gone. For such an intellectually daft woman, she is reportedly (from left-of-center sources) an extremely Machiavellian operator. The Democratic party is very machine-oriented... it's in their DNA. When Pelosi give her nod and thumbs down, that's when you go down. That's why Jill Biden can't stand Pelosi. Biden was "the best Biden ever", he was "fit, rested and ready" and "had a stutter" right up until Pelosi stood up from her Emperor's box, looked upon the arena and turned her thumb downward (in the Hollywood Roman way). She reportedly did the same thing with Swalwell. It was an 'everyone kind of knew' situation but stayed quiet until Pelosi gave the go-ahead that he was done.

        Log in to Reply
    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 hours ago

      Yes. Corporate media lies about and ignores dem antics. Sadly you support it.

      Log in to Reply
  2. jimc5499   3 hours ago

    They didn't "miss" the story. They were too busy making up shit about Trump. There's a reason that Journalism is a LIBERAL Arts Degree.

    Log in to Reply
  3. MollyGodiva   2 hours ago

    The media did not miss a story, there was no story. Politicians being sexual predators is normal and accepted in the US, especially by Republicans.

    It is like the time nominations were falling like flies because people did not pay taxes on their nannies. Nowadays no one cares.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 hours ago

      Damn you cope a lot. Weren't you screaming about epstein?

      Log in to Reply
    2. TrickyVic (old school)   10 minutes ago

      But there is a story, but you don't like it because it is not about the team you hate.

      Log in to Reply
  4. Rick James   2 hours ago

    but I find it strange that no one tried back in 2020, particularly with #MeToo still being a major topic of interest for the media at the time.

    Robby, is this you honestly finding it strange-- or you quietly, inside, deep down, absolutely know why no one tried while typing the words "you find it strange" in some sort of "I'm a neutral reporter here, just the facts, ma'am" kind of strange.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Dillinger   2 hours ago

    look in the fucking mirror "senior editor at Reason"

    Log in to Reply
  6. Azathoth!!   2 hours ago

    Why didn't you report on it, Robby?

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 hours ago

      Not news until the NYT is forced to report it.

      Log in to Reply
  7. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 hours ago

    Maybe the media just found it unbelievable that a straight male Democrat would be a danger to women?

    #OutOfCharacter

    Log in to Reply
  8. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 hours ago

    Which story? The treason story, the rape story, or the fart story?

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

San Jose's 'Creepy' and 'Deeply Intrusive' ALPR Camera System Is Unconstitutional, a New Lawsuit Says

Jacob Sullum | 4.16.2026 4:50 PM

Did the Media Miss the Eric Swalwell Story?

Robby Soave | 4.16.2026 3:55 PM

Pete Hegseth's Pulp Fiction Prayer Isn't the First Time He's Used Religion To Justify Illegal War in Iran

Jeff Luse | 4.16.2026 3:23 PM

62-Year-Old Protester Acquitted on All Charges for Wearing Penis Costume

Joe Lancaster | 4.16.2026 1:04 PM

Congress Declines Again To Rein in Trump's Iran War

Matthew Petti | 4.16.2026 12:29 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks