This New Jersey Immigrant Backed Trump for Over 10 Years. Then ICE Detained Him.
“You said you were going after the worst of the worst, but instead you ruined our life."
Every summer, millions of Americans take time off from work for a much-needed holiday. Airports fill with families juggling carry-ons and boarding passes. For most, the experience is tedious but predictable: security lines, flight delays, overpriced coffee. The same was true for New Jersey couple Abdellatif and Sandra Hafraoui, who, in August 2025, were at Newark Airport, on their way to a trip to Fort Myers, Florida, that they had planned with friends. The itinerary was set. Rental cars reserved. An Airbnb booked and paid for.
They didn't make it past the gate.
As the Hafraouis prepared to board their flight out, the couple found themselves confronted by four federal agents, three of whom were plainclothed. They handcuffed Abdellatif and escorted him out of the terminal. What was supposed to be a relaxing summer vacation suddenly turned into a 108-day stint in an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention facility.
"They looked at him and said 'his status is unclear,'" Sandra Hafraoui told NJ.com, which recently published a feature on the couple's case. The agents—one of whom identified herself as being with ICE—refused to disclose where her husband was being taken, only warning her not "to make a scene."
According to NJ.com's reporting, Hafraoui—who is originally from Morocco—legally immigrated to the United States more than 38 years ago, initially sponsored by an employer. After getting married in 2011, he renewed his authorization through a spousal petition while pursuing permanent residency. The trigger for his arrest was not a criminal charge, but a long-standing "in absentia" removal order issued after he failed to appear at a scheduled immigration hearing before his marriage, HuffPost reports. Such orders are entered when a noncitizen misses a court date and remain enforceable unless later reopened.
Hafraoui alleges that he was never informed of that hearing and that his former attorney—who was later sentenced to five years in prison in 2013 for operating a large-scale immigration fraud scheme—did not notify him of the court hearing. Regardless of these circumstances, immigration procedure demands that an arrest must be made should authorities uncover a discrepancy.
Hafraoui was first taken to the Delaney Hall Detention Facility in Newark, where he was processed, according to NJ.com. Sandra described confusing visitation rules and one incident in which a guard shouted at him for briefly reaching across a table during a visit. About two weeks into his detention, Hafraoui said officers pressured him to board a flight and sign away his rights; when he refused, he was placed in solitary confinement for 10 days and later transferred to facilities in Louisiana and Arizona. He was twice placed on charter flights for removal—including one bound for Morocco while his case was still pending—before a New Jersey immigration judge vacated the prior deportation order and he was taken off the plane. It wasn't until November that Hafraoui was released on a $15,000 bond.
At first glance, Hafraoui's detention may seem routine amid the nearly 600,000 immigration arrests ICE carried out in 2025. Yet many of those arrests did not involve violent offenders. According to analysis by the Cato Institute's David Bier, roughly 93 percent of individuals taken into ICE custody that year had no violent criminal convictions, and about two-thirds had no criminal convictions at all.
While the legal authority for Hafraoui's arrest dates back to 1996 with the passage of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, the scale and intensity of enforcement under the Trump administration's crackdown have drawn scrutiny—particularly given the president's pledge to prioritize deporting the "worst of the worst." Critics point not only to cases involving nonviolent detainees, such as the June 2025 arrest of a military wife with no criminal record and the March 2025 attempted deportation of Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia, but also to more extreme incidents like the February 2025 detention of George Retes, a U.S. Army veteran and American citizen.
Given this context, the Hafraoui case should come as little surprise to critics of President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policies. But for Sandra, the detention has carried an extra layer of shock. Both she and her husband have, ironically, been supporters of Trump for over a decade; when speaking to NJ.com, she noted that they had supported him in each of the three previous presidential elections, even attending one of his rallies in Las Vegas. As such, she expected that Trump's immigration enforcement would only target immigrants who were either in the country illegally or who possessed criminal records, not established residents with longstanding community ties like her husband.
"To think we were MAGA," Sandra said, adding that, if she could speak to the president now, she would say, "You said you were going after the worst of the worst, but instead you ruined our life."
For now, Hafraoui remains subject to regular ICE check-ins while wearing an electronic ankle monitor. His attorneys are working to reopen the prior removal order, and an immigration judge will ultimately decide whether the decades-old order is lifted or allowed to stand.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
And? Did he break the law? Good.
It seems he has a compelling case to be allowed to remain in this country.
Has ICE made a statement about this case?
The only statement I want ICE to make is to explain why they did not immediately deport him.
I applaud her. She supported getting her own husband deported in order to stand up for what she believes in. Never forget that bigotry is stronger than family.
I will reserve judgment until I hear the other side of the story. Jacob is providing only this couple's side and treating it as unquestionably true.
Even at that, it sounds like the sort of misunderstanding that got Vicki Weaver shot in the face. Except for the underlying "immigration and naturalization" vs. "shall not be infringed" issue.
Even giving Sullum undue full faith and credit: ~700,000 deportations and they finally found one! ICE has a 0.0001% failure rate, time to give up on this whole border enforcement endeavor! I'm sure all the voter fraud and welfare
fraudconsumption numbers are much, much lower.There have been far more than one.
MAGAs are the dumbest shits on the planet.
Sandra described confusing visitation rules and one incident in which a guard shouted at him for briefly reaching across a table during a visit.
Compare this, the worst incident they can identify to support his mistreatment, to how leftists treat people complaining about dangerous circumstances on the subway. Leftists identify with illegals, so him being yelled at for breaking rules is a big deal. But leftists don't support people who complain about being yelled at, threatened, intimidated, attacked, or made to watch someone fucking a corpse on the subway. So we should just deal with that and quit complaining.
There's never a consistent standard. Everything the left says is driven by identity politics and that's how they believe the law should work as well.
This literally happens to Americans too. I dont recall stories for them visiting people in jails.
"dangerous circumstances on the subway"
NYC's subways may be the safest place in a safe city. Only 4 homicides in 2025. There were more deaths from subway surfing and other suicides. Meanwhile there were 205 motor vehicle fatalities, even though there are more daily subway riders than there are automobiles in NYC.
People who say the subways are dangerous are delusional. The most dangerous part of taking the subway is that you might be hit by a car truck or bus while walking to the subway.
Only 4 homicides in 2025.
See how he lied? He pretends "dangerous" can only mean homicides. And right on time you're "delusional" for caring about only 4 people dying. How many died in Minnesota protesting ICE? 2?
But meanwhile we're supposed to be broken up that someone was yelled at for not following the rules.
They're so deep in the propaganda they don't even recognize what they are doing. The training gets them to leap to these conclusions without ever evaluating why the logical processes are so different in each circumstance.
It seems that when people say the US is a nation of laws don't comprehend what that means. It means the laws are enforced, even the laws we don't agree with, such as overstaying a deportation order. Trump said he would start with the worst of the worse, not that he would only deport the worst of the worse. Many localities are refusing to assist the feds in arresting and deporting the worst of the worse so the feds will take every illegal immigrant it locates and deport them. We cannot be a nation of laws if the laws are not enforced.
By your definition the US is not a nation of laws. Never has been.
"It means the laws are enforced, even the laws we don't agree with"
Of the laws against document fraud that Trump broke and was convicted of. 34x. All the people who want illegal immigrants deported but support Trump are flaming hypocrites. Or nativist bigots. Or both.
While, as presented, this case certain tugs at the heart (appeal to emotion)...
For fuck's sake! Learn to logic.
A lack of criminal convictions is not evidence of a lack of criminal conduct. How many violent criminals get away with it and, thus, are never arrested, tried, and convicted? How many are arrested, tried, but not convicted for one reason or another? While I do not know the correct answer, I do know that it is greater than zero by a wide margin.
They will never learn deportation in leiu of prosecution.
By that logic there is no evidence that you are not a violent criminal.
"A lack of criminal convictions is not evidence of a lack of criminal conduct."
You don't believe in the Rule of Law.
…after he failed to appear at a scheduled immigration hearing before his marriage
I think i spotted the problem.
Reason continues to intentionally and calculatedly blur the line between legal and illegal migration. Also, Reason constantly argues that people without violent histories are being deported, as if that matters. Anybody who came here illegally or became illegal after legally entering the US should be deported if they don't self-deport. There's nothing controversial about enforcing laws and borders. There's nothing 'libertarian' about insisting that the law is enforced uniformly.
Trump is the leader of not caring about the difference between legal and illegal immigration.
Go fuck yourself.
>>The trigger for his arrest was ... a long-standing "in absentia" removal order issued after he failed to appear at a scheduled immigration hearing
this matters. everything else you girlied up your piece with does not.
Every article I read today leads to an initial response of "bullshit".
something, something, Trump evil, something else.
So this wasn't the fault of the scammer immigration lawyer but Trump's fault for actually enforcing the law. Fuck off with that dishonest BS
MAGA is indeed the worst of the worst. They supported this. No sympathy.