Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Jeffrey Epstein

Bondi Bristles

Plus: the attorney general's self-inflicted wounds, religious revivals, and Congress votes to stop Trump's tariffs on Canada

Christian Britschgi | 2.12.2026 9:34 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Pam Bondi | Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom
(Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom)

Pam Bondi snaps at Congressmen. Over the course of five hours of testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, Attorney General Pam Bondi gave increasingly agitated responses to members' questions about the Epstein files her department recently released.

She called ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D–Md.) a "washed-up loser lawyer" and Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) a "failed politician" with "Trump derangement syndrome."

At the hearing, members pressed Bondi on a range of things related to Jeffrey Epstein and her department's release of documents related to the dead, disgraced financier. In particular, representatives pressed Bondi on why material on Epstein's associates was redacted, but the names, pictures, and other sensitive information of victims were not.

For the most part, Bondi did not give direct answers, preferring instead insults and odd nonsequiturs about how the stock market was at record heights.

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

On the one hand, one can understand some of Bondi's frustrations. Committee hearings like yesterday's are largely political theater.

A lot of Democrats' "questions" were really just partisan grandstanding, like when Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D–Wash.) asked Epstein victims in the audience to stand so that Bondi could apologize to them for failing to redact their names.

Bondi wasn't wrong when she said several times that Democrats did not care that much about Epstein when Joe Biden was president and Merrick Garland was attorney general.

Still, even when Democrats asked more measured, substantive questions, like when Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D–Calif.) pressed Bondi on whether some of Epstein's emails suggested that there were still coconspirators left to prosecute, the attorney general still resorted to evasions and insults.

A problem of one's own making. Generally, it's hard to feel any sympathy for Bondi at all. The debacle over the Epstein files is one of her own making.

It was Bondi who seemed to say in an interview that she had Epstein's (probably mythical) client list sitting on her desk waiting to be released, before walking it back. It was Bondi who made a big show of giving right-wing influencers binders labeled "Epstein files" filled with redacted or already public documents.

That game of promising more transparency on Epstein while offering none has spectacularly backfired. In the end, Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in a near-unanimous vote. When asked follow-up questions about those files, Bondi broke down.

Even in the face of partisan, showy committee questions, it would be nice to have an attorney general who was modestly professional and interested in transparency.


Scenes from D.C.: The latest war of religion has broken out on X about whether America's youth is becoming more Christian and, more specifically, more Catholic.

Researcher and former pastor Ryan Burge says not really. Per Burge, 2023's surge in Catholicism was an outlier. Every year since then has shown a steady, stagnant percentage of Catholic Zoomers.

There is no surge of Catholicism among Gen Z.

The 2023 Cooperative Election Study showed a surge in Catholic numbers.

It was clearly an outlier.

The 2024 data was right back to baseline - 15%. pic.twitter.com/fYphTIYYRj

— Ryan Burge ???? (@ryanburge) February 11, 2026

I'd really encourage everyone to listen to Burge's recent appearance on Ross Douthat's podcast, where he breaks down America's religiosity in more detail.

But a stagnating church is not the case in Washington, D.C., says Robert Schmad in response to Burge's post.

We have a lot of data points confirming there is no national mass Catholic conversion among American youths.

Staffers in DC, however, certainly think it's happening. That's because - among them specifically - there absolutely is an ongoing conversion movement.

At social… https://t.co/Roqgf9Gbkl

— robert schmad (@RobertSchmad) February 12, 2026

My own anecdotal experience matches Schmad's take. My 150-year-old D.C. parish has welcomed record numbers of converts in recent years. Long-time parishioners tell me that Mass attendance has exploded.

Perhaps that's just more evidence of Catholic decline: A shrinking number of faithful are concentrating in fewer, more vibrant parishes.

Or maybe not. The next Great Awakening has to start somewhere. Perhaps centralized nodes of intense religiosity are what's necessary to revive true religion in America.


QUICK LINKS

  • James Van Der Beek, a man of apparent Dutch ancestry and an actor on TV's Dawson's Creek, died at age 48.
  • Larry Sharpe is running for public office again.
  • Johnathan Haidt is in The Free Press taking a victory lap for popularizing the case against youths' smartphone use.
  • The Federal Trade Commission chairman warns that Apple News' alleged political bias might be an antitrust violation in a letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook.
  • The House votes to stop President Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada.
  • The FBI tracked down an anonymous 4chan conspiracy theorist because of claims he made about Epstein.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Luck of the Draw

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

Jeffrey EpsteinAttorney GeneralTransparencyCongressThomas MassieCriminal JusticeTrump AdministrationPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (153)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   7 hours ago

    Pam Bondi snaps at Congressmen.

    OUR CHERISHED INSTITUTIONS!

    Log in to Reply
    1. HorseConch   7 hours ago

      Our best and brightest are fighting for truth, justice, and freedom, and she just goes in there and starts snapping left and right. So much snapping.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

        You know who else likes an energetic snapper?

        Log in to Reply
        1. HorseConch   6 hours ago

          me

          Log in to Reply
        2. Ska   6 hours ago

          The Wayans brothers?

          Log in to Reply
        3. Marshal   4 hours ago

          Wilt Chamberlain?

          [liked]

          Log in to Reply
    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   7 hours ago

      She called ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D–Md.) a "washed-up loser lawyer" and Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) a "failed politician" with "Trump derangement syndrome."

      Prove her wrong.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

        The fact that Massie is teaming up with Khanna (who voted against clinton subpoenas and against censure of epstein politicians) shows massie isnt exactly being noble on this. It is looking like Massie realized he spent so many calories on the subject but now realized there is nothing there, he is now grandstanding.

        He spent more time on mistakes of going through 9M+ files that have already been corrected than actual findings from the files that were noteworthy.

        Log in to Reply
        1. HorseConch   6 hours ago

          Are you telling me that Mr Billionaire tax himself who is also the most active stock trader in congress isn't a freedom fighter like Massie styles himself?

          Log in to Reply
          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

            Go on...

            Log in to Reply
          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

            Reason loves themselves some Ro Khanna though. Foreign McDreamy.

            Log in to Reply
            1. HorseConch   6 hours ago

              He's the perfect congressman for silicon valley, but he can't move to greener pastures with the billionaires he ran off.

              Log in to Reply
  2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

    Politico and it's darling judges brag about ignoring scotus and appeals courts through novel but non judicial creation of rights to get around the rulings against them.

    https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/11/politico-judges-use-workarounds-to-bypass-pro-trump-rulings-on-immigration/

    This continues to have activist judges release the worst of illegal immigrants with final deportation orders ranging from pedophiles to murderers.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-judge-releases-four-illegal-immigrants-convicted-murder-sex-crimes-ice-custody

    This continues to demonstrate against the lie that judges are acting in a constitutional manner or democrats agree with deporting violent illegals.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

      Such as in California despite a 9th circuit holding.

      Bill Melugin
      @BillMelugin_
      This Salvadoran illegal alien soccer coach in the Los Angeles area who is already charged with murdering one of his teenage players & sexually assaulting two other boys is now being charged with 8 counts of sodomy of a person under age 16 & oral copulation of a minor under 16.

      Log in to Reply
    2. Idaho-Bob   7 hours ago

      We are doing this all wrong. Every time an activist judge rules against deporting a violent illegal, we follow them around, screaming & blowing whistles, make racket outside their houses, keep them awake at hotels, harass their spouses at their places of employment, and make apps so we ALL can take relentless turns.

      I'm told all of this qualifies as peaceful protest.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

        Problem is foreign communists aren't paying us to protest as a job.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Vernon Depner   6 hours ago

          And we already have jobs that pay better.

          Log in to Reply
          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

            And even if we didnt have them have more life skills to get another one than they do.

            Log in to Reply
  3. Fist of Etiquette   7 hours ago

    ...representatives pressed Bondi on why material on Epstein's associates was redacted, but the names, pictures, and other sensitive information of victims were not.

    If the victims didn't want to be exposed by the federal government maybe they should have bought the federal government.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JFree   7 hours ago

      Lotsa truth there. And 150+ million Americans vote in elections for a government that ain't theirs

      Log in to Reply
      1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   4 hours ago

        Yes it is, you disingenuous twat.

        Log in to Reply
    2. Vernon Depner   6 hours ago

      Start your own federal government!

      Log in to Reply
  4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

    What an amazing "correction" to a wapo story. Correction completely undoes the original claim.

    https://x.com/washingtonpost/status/2021716832911061495

    Original claim was deleted so screen shot in post.

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   7 hours ago

      Normally, the "You had one job." memes are a a stack of bun, condiments, lettuce, cheese, pickles, and a bun with no beef or a sparkly clean bathroom floor with a toilet covered in shit or something.

      Failing to search social media before posting to social media is some next-level "You had one job." failure. It should come with some Holy Grail-esque "The people were sacked. The people in charge of the people were sacked..." exposition.

      Log in to Reply
  5. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

    Europe embraces Trumpism as EU votes to stop asylum shopping forcing immigrants into first safe harbor they pass through. Also allow transport of illegals to third party countries.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/no-more-asylum-tourism-right-wing-victory-brussels-votes-ease-migrant-transfer-safe

    Log in to Reply
    1. Gaear Grimsrud   7 hours ago

      Have to say I'm surprised by this but it's probably too little too late.

      Log in to Reply
      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 hours ago

        They need another Reconquista. Which won't be pretty.

        Log in to Reply
  6. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

    Arizona to end weeks long ballot harvesting post elections with rule that says early voting has to be finished early.

    https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/10/arizona-house-advances-constitutional-amendment-to-end-delayed-election-results/

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

      Meanwhile democrats in the house vote to continue massive voter fraud.

      https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/10/arizona-house-advances-constitutional-amendment-to-end-delayed-election-results/

      Log in to Reply
    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

      "Proposed fixes to Arizona’s delayed election results aren’t the only provisions included in HCR 2001, however. The measure also includes several policies long supported by election integrity activists.

      "Among these include a voter ID requirement, a mandate that only U.S. citizens may register and vote in elections, and a ban on foreign nationals financially “influencing” Arizona elections. It also requires all eligible voters seeking to receive a mail-in ballot to “have provided documented proof of citizenship” when registering to vote and confirm their preferred ballot-delivery address before each biennial election cycle."

      So, Jim Crow 3.0? 4.0?

      Log in to Reply
      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   6 hours ago

        Jim Crow 4.20.

        Log in to Reply
  7. Fist of Etiquette   7 hours ago

    My 150-year-old D.C. parish has welcomed record numbers of converts in recent years. Long-time parishioners tell me that Mass attendance has exploded.

    THE WHOLE POINT OF NOT ALLOWING CONDOMS IS TO AVOID HAVING TO IMPORT DIRTY PROTESTANTS.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Gaear Grimsrud   7 hours ago

      But don't protestants do the work Catholics won't do?

      Log in to Reply
      1. Medulla Oblongata   7 hours ago

        I'm told a lot of the illegal aliens are Catholic, so, no?

        Log in to Reply
      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   7 hours ago

        Every sperm is sacred
        Every sperm is great
        If a sperm is wasted
        God gets quite irate

        Log in to Reply
        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

          So it's medical experiments for the lot of you.

          Log in to Reply
    2. mad.casual   6 hours ago

      This is about Mexicans and ass sex isn't it?

      Log in to Reply
      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   6 hours ago

        Well, this is Reason, isn’t it? All we’re missing is the weed.

        Log in to Reply
        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 hours ago

          You dont want Mexican weed.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Dillinger   4 hours ago

            don't think I've even seen Mexican weed in 20 years

            Log in to Reply
      2. Vernon Depner   6 hours ago

        Can the Roman Catholic priesthood survive without ass sex?

        Log in to Reply
  8. Fist of Etiquette   7 hours ago

    Larry Sharpe is running for public office again.

    The Empire State could do worse. The Empire State has done worse.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

      When does the Empire strike back?

      Log in to Reply
  9. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

    The House votes to stop President Donald Trump's tariffs on Canada.

    Still not what actually happened. Was a vote to set up a vote.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Fist of Etiquette   7 hours ago

    The FBI tracked down an anonymous 4chan conspiracy theorist because of claims he made about Epstein.

    Did the 4chan mods even try blocking the feds' SUV's and screeching through bullhorns?

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

      Leave their basements? Are you high? Should have paid dumb old boomers to do that for them.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

        Once a hippy (or wanna-be hippy), always a hippy.

        "Let's stick it to the man, man!"

        Log in to Reply
        1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 hours ago

          But..you are the man.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZG-VB5xb6KM

          Log in to Reply
  11. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   7 hours ago

    Are we done with bad bunny already?

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 hours ago

      Numbers finally came out. Half of SB viewers switched off the halftime show. Goes against the bad bunny is the greatest living artist rhetoric.

      Log in to Reply
      1. mad.casual   6 hours ago

        Yeah, Nielsen and major networks showed Bunny lost more views year-over-year than a notoriously boring Super Bowl and that the Kid Rock event, all by itself, more than made up the difference on both fronts. Viewership via Telemundo was up largely percentage-wise, but virtually every other channel and venue was down by larger larger absolute numbers.

        Bad Bunny was a choice. It was not a good choice.

        Log in to Reply
      2. creech   6 hours ago

        I was one of those who turned off the half time show. But your stats don't jibe with Nielsen's rating. They claim an average of 124.9 million viewers were tuned to the Super Bowl, and that the half time show had 128.2 million viewers tuned in. Maybe viewers took a potty break or got more beer and dip, but they didn't "switch off."

        Log in to Reply
        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

          Looks like youre right. Can't find the article i referenced. But was a record number of drops while watching.

          https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/bad-bunny-reportedly-lost-record-slice-of-super-bowl-viewers-heading-into-halftime-show/

          Log in to Reply
        2. MT-Man   6 hours ago

          I see you are showing an increase in the comment above. Are we to believe that there was 4 million at min (not counting if some of those numbers replaced people who tuned out) that were watching something stopped watching it because the halftime show or doing nothing just waiting to turn on the halftime show? That seems weird just in general.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Ska   5 hours ago

            My wife was one of those viewers. Wasn't watching the Super Bowl, tuned in to the halftime show (which she's also done for the last few years), then went back to watching what she was watching.

            She's in entertainment media, though, so for her it was kind of "need to have seen it because clients will ask" type viewing. I could see uninterested people tuning in so that when it inevitably comes up at work on Monday they could seem connected to the normals.

            Log in to Reply
            1. mad.casual   4 hours ago

              Which only undermines the numbers and contributes nothing to the assertion that he's a critical, pan-cultural iconoclast.

              Log in to Reply
              1. Ska   3 hours ago

                I wasn't confirming he is anything other than "current events" whether one likes it or not.

                Log in to Reply
        3. MT-Man   6 hours ago

          I last saw the number move up to 135.something.

          Log in to Reply
        4. Bubba Jones   5 hours ago

          "I was one of those who turned off the half time show."

          What a weird thing to do. Heaven forbid you might be exposed to something new and different.

          Log in to Reply
          1. MasterThief   5 hours ago

            It was a bad performance. Bad audio quality and mumbled lyrics. If not for the occasional shots of the jumbotron I wouldn't have been able to pick out more than 1 in 3 words. I know a few of those songs as well. People are really overhyping the show on ideological grounds and because they sought emotional connection with some of the visuals.

            Log in to Reply
            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   4 hours ago

              Saw a video taken from the stands (maybe three or four minutes long), and the performance just looked boring from there, to me. The people dressed as plants and sugarcane blocked any view of the performance on the field.

              Log in to Reply
          2. mad.casual   4 hours ago

            Going forward, I will replace "airport lounge culture" as euphemism for global anti-culturalism with "Superbowl Halftime Show culture" ~50% of the time.

            The idea of turning off the Super Bowl just for halftime seems kinda dumb, but a personal choice or preference. The idea of turning the Super Bowl on just for halftime, to broaden one's horizons or expose oneself to the larger, global culture seems actively retarded.

            Thank you.

            Log in to Reply
        5. Purple Martin   3 hours ago

          I didn't watch the halftime show, but then I haven't watched a Super Bowl halftime in at least a couple of decades. But I have read much of, and watched some of the follow-up analysis (same with the commercials). Chunks of it seemed pretty entertaining, even if I'm not a Spanish speaker.

          Here's a decent WaPo overview (gift link): https://wapo.st/4kz2Hqh

          Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl halftime show was expected to provoke. Did it?
          The show nodded to Puerto Rican injustices and highlighted some hip thrusts. But despite preemptive outrage from Trump, the superstar evoked wholesome values that meshed with the sentiment of the big game.
          Washington Post | Shane O’Neill | February 9, 2026

          So how provocative was it? On a scale of 1 to 10 — with 10 being Justin Timberlake exposing Janet Jackson’s breast in the “wardrobe malfunction” that prompted a 2004 federal investigation, 1 being Up With People covering “The Monster Mash” in 1982 — Bad Bunny’s halftime show was a solid 3. If that.

          If you were looking for political commentary, the closest that you got was the moment at the end when he said “God bless America” in English — then proceeded to name all of the countries in the Western Hemisphere in geographical order from south to north. ...

          Log in to Reply
          1. Marshal   2 hours ago

            Left wing narrative:

            the superstar evoked wholesome values that meshed with the sentiment of the big game.

            Reality:

            Real G, guiding the new generations with the OG one
            Galactic style lust
            Yes, so that your panties get wet
            Get horny and versatile
            More slutty than Betty Boop
            The one who got horny, mami, was you
            I stay killing with the U
            Pussy with dick, dick with ass (Push it in)
            Pu-pussy with dick, dick with ass, yes (Push it in)
            Pussy with dick, dick with ass (Push it in)
            Your tits rubbing my nipples (Push it in)
            This year I don't want sluts (Push it in)
            They see you with a lot of jewels and they want to stay (Push it in)
            They see you really active and they want to stay (Push it in)
            Because you look hot, because you look hot (Push it in me completely)
            Really big tits like Lourdes Chacón
            Really big ass like Iris Chacón
            I don't know why I haven't seen the pussy
            But let's go to bed to fuck you in panties

            The lyrics don't include the twerking portion of the performance.

            Summary:

            The entire narrative was orchestrated. The guy was picked to be crass and offensive to family viewers, and he was. His allies lie about his offensiveness because it's more helpful to portray their enemies as unhappy over nothing than it is to show them unhappy over something. The media script was written before Bunny had even accepted the invite.

            Log in to Reply
        6. Marshal   2 hours ago

          That average isn't consistent though. The ratings are reported by quarter-hour and the halftime show lost 5.5 million viewers from the preceding quarter. By contrast in all other recent years the halftime show had increased ratings from the preceding quarter.

          Log in to Reply
      3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   6 hours ago

        Game was so bad, I turned it off before half time.

        Log in to Reply
        1. MasterThief   5 hours ago

          I'm stubborn and watch the whole superbowl regardless of how bad it is. This one was somehow worse than last year's garbage game. Maybe if the refs stop interfering in games and changing the outcomes we could actually get the best 2 in the championship.

          Log in to Reply
    2. Moderation4ever   7 hours ago

      Most people are but some MAGA still will not give it up, see JesseAZ.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   7 hours ago

        So he wasn’t the greatest entertainer that took the nation by storm?

        Log in to Reply
      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

        How was i the one who brought it up parody?

        Reason had multiple articles about it.

        Are you this retarded in real life or just on your retard parody account?

        Log in to Reply
  12. Use the Schwartz   7 hours ago

    "true religion"

    That what they all say LOL!

    "Johnathan Haidt is in The Free Press taking a victory lap for popularizing the case against youths' smartphone use."

    Well now speaking of religion...

    Log in to Reply
    1. LIBtranslator   6 hours ago

      Speaking of which: Jeffrey Dahmer, Congressman Clay Higgins and Charlie Kirk walk into a tit bar...

      Log in to Reply
      1. MT-Man   6 hours ago

        please finish, I'd love to hear the punchline.

        Log in to Reply
      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   6 hours ago

        And there’s no punch line.

        Log in to Reply
        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 hours ago

          Yeah, it wasn't a joke, just a random trip.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 hours ago

            Hank is the bartender in the story.

            'naked to the world. In front of, every kind of girl.' - (with apologies to Eric Burden)

            Log in to Reply
  13. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   7 hours ago

    The hard racism and sexism of basement expectations.

    https://x.com/westernlensman/status/2021935582075613450?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    Holy Cow: @ScottJenningsKY takes on hostile CNN panel throwing the rhetorical kitchen sink at the SAVE Act:

    Racist! Married women can't vote! Poor white people!

    Johnson: It’s Jim Crow 2.0.

    Jennings: 76% of black voters think we should show an I.D. to vote. Are you saying that black voters don't know what's good for them?

    Phillip: There’s an argument to made that red state poor white people could also be impacted.

    Jennings: You think they’re dumb too don’t you?

    Phillip: You should be thinking about your constituents.

    Jennings: I think they're smart enough to figure out how to vote, Abby.

    Wow.

    It goes on.

    They are just incensed about the idea of citizenship requirements and voter ID.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

      If a CNN anchor can figure out how to vote, anybody can.

      Log in to Reply
    2. mad.casual   6 hours ago

      Racism/sexism aside: What, exactly, is the problem with married women who think they can't vote not voting?

      Where in The Constitution... or any part of any democracy, republican or otherwise, ever was it the government's job to convince people who think they shouldn't or can't vote that they should? Seems like a superficially retarded, if not fundamentally suicidal, thing for a democracy to do.

      Even without voting it doesn't make any real sense. If the state issues a law that says, "All bodies discovered without state ID shall be treated as a homicide." is it the government's job to go around making sure that married women understand that if they intend to shoot themselves, the name on their ID should match their birth certificate?

      Log in to Reply
      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

        Have you read the Ladies Home Constitution, or the version put out by the Academic Marxist League?

        Log in to Reply
      2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 hours ago

        Lying Jeffy thinks that you shouldn't have to get off your couch to vote.

        Log in to Reply
        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   4 hours ago

          I sincerely doubt Lying Jeffy can get off his couch.

          Log in to Reply
      3. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 hours ago

        Chick logic:
        I may have to prove my maiden name to get Real ID. (though not a passport)
        my maiden name is on my birth certificate
        I may or may not know where my birth certificate is
        In this day and age of technical proficiency I don't know if I will be able to find and get a copy of my birth certificate in my original birth town.
        That seems really hard in my mind
        If it's hard for me it could be harder if I am foreign or live in a rural area because they don't have the interwebs like I do.
        Without my maiden name proof I won't be able to get an ID
        They don't want married women to vote!
        Real ID means a poll tax!

        Log in to Reply
  14. mad.casual   7 hours ago

    Generally, it's hard to feel any sympathy for Bondi at all. The debacle over the Epstein files is one of her own making.

    As someone who spent a lot of time in his youth watching pigs wrestle, not interested.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Dillinger   5 hours ago

      did the Tri-Delts not rush Christian?

      Log in to Reply
  15. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   7 hours ago

    Utterly nuts in a dark, twisted way.

    https://x.com/jtalexander_/status/2021720913927078016?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    >be Canadian
    >walk to school
    >have to use rainbow crosswalk
    >get to school
    >rainbow flag is flying
    >go inside
    >classroom and hallways full of rainbows
    >class is upstairs
    >stairs are painted rainbow
    >sit at my desk
    >teacher has a rainbow lapel pin
    >hear shouting and shooting
    >my friends are dead
    >killer is a citizen of the rainbow flag nation
    >call police
    >they show up in a car painted with rainbows

    Log in to Reply
  16. Moderation4ever   7 hours ago

    So Pam Bondi stepped in a pile of manure by her comments to be transparent about Epstein, Politics 101 is don't give your opposition anything to hurt you. The damage is done and the quickest way out for Bondi is to get the Epstein files out ASAP. There is no going back, no way to save this error. So just ripe the BandAid off quick. As for trying to throw this back on President Biden, why? It wasn't even a issue till Pam Bondi made it one. Biden has no responsibility to have though about saving Bondi at some future date.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

      If this is what you believe parody, then you must be raging against democrats like yourself ignoring it for 4 years.

      Log in to Reply
    2. Incunabulum   6 hours ago

      Get the Epstein files out ASAP - why do you think Democrats have been screaming? The files ar out and they're all getting their named dragged through the mud right now.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

        Got even more amusing today. Dollar store Obama got hit.

        mike bski
        @BskiMike22802
        Dear
        @RepJeffries
        ,

        Well, well, well. Look what the House Oversight Committee dragged in. Document HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029342, for anyone keeping score at home.

        So on May 7, 2013, Lesley Groff -- Jeffrey Epstein's personal secretary and NAMED CO-CONSPIRATOR in his trafficking case -- forwarded an email TO EPSTEIN about YOU. The subject line? "Rising Star." How flattering. Dynamic SRG was pitching you as "Brooklyn's Barack," a "staunch supporter of President Obama," and encouraging Epstein to participate in a DCCC/DSCC fundraising dinner with Obama himself.

        Let me make sure I have this straight. A lobbying firm was actively connecting YOU to a man who was running a child sex trafficking operation, and his indicted co-conspirator was the one making the introduction. And you want us to believe you had NO IDEA who Jeffrey Epstein was or what he was about? That dog will not hunt, Hakeem.

        Here is where it gets REAL interesting. Obama's own White House Counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, had MULTIPLE documented email exchanges with Epstein, met with him on numerous occasions, and participated in his PR strategy sessions. Epstein even told Ruemmler to "talk to your boss" -- widely understood to mean Obama himself. So your party's inner circle was neck-deep in Epstein connections while you were being served up to him as the next big thing. The whole operation is dumber than a screen door on a submarine, but somehow nobody noticed.

        You have spent years demanding Epstein file releases to embarrass Trump. Your party released THREE carefully selected emails, redacted Virginia Giuffre's name to make it look sinister, and the Republicans responded by dumping 20,000. And what did we learn? Giuffre -- under oath -- said Trump NEVER acted inappropriately toward her. SEVEN Epstein survivors went on ABC News and confirmed ZERO impropriety from Trump. Meanwhile, YOUR name is sitting in Epstein's inbox courtesy of his trafficking co-conspirator.

        https://x.com/BskiMike22802/status/2021749174065082827

        Log in to Reply
    3. LIBtranslator   6 hours ago

      Politics 101 told the Dems to thank the 1931 Liberal Party platform committee for drafting the nifty repeal plank they used to win five consecutive elections. So 2016 Dems stuck their tongues out at Gary Johnson, assured trigger-happy narcs that electric power plants were the REAL enemy, and suddenly appeared in tear-jerker commercials begging electoral college voters to write in Zippy Boothead, Bony Sanders and Al Gorge. Nice work, looters!

      Log in to Reply
      1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   4 hours ago

        Stroke protocol is to seek medical attention ASAP

        Log in to Reply
  17. NealAppeal   7 hours ago

    a man of apparent Dutch ancestry

    Britches' commitment to journalistic research continues unchallenged.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Purple Martin   3 hours ago

      I liked the dry understated humor. It's obviously not for everyone...want me to explain it for you?

      Log in to Reply
  18. Moderation4ever   7 hours ago

    Why argue over gains made by this Christian sect or another when the big issue in American faith is the rise in "Nones". Those with no preferred religion. Some are spiritual, some agnostic and some atheist.

    Log in to Reply
    1. LIBtranslator   6 hours ago

      Dude, this is important! After Mussolini and the Pope iv Rome put Catholic catechism in government schools, Italy faked a rumble between fascism and papistry. This was amplified in response to stories about Adolf Hitler being the Second Coming of Christ leaking even as far as U.S. papers! The Nazi platform and Hitler speeches made it all too clear this was their campaign strategy, while Jew-baiting was thrown in to win over the Lutherans. This worked, and is why the Republicans model their planks and strategy into pretending Freethinkers do not exist.

      Log in to Reply
      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 hours ago

        You some kind of anti-Catholic bigot, Hank? If so, fuck you and fuck off.

        Log in to Reply
        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   5 hours ago

          I think he is an all purpose bigot.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 hours ago

            Nonsensical spigot as well.

            Log in to Reply
  19. NoVaNick   7 hours ago

    In other news-the mass shooting in BC yesterday was carried out by an 18 yo biological male who transitioned to female, starting at age 12:

    From https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/world/americas/canada-tumbler-ridge-shooting.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share

    Given that such shootings are relatively rare, the past several shooters have also been young people who transitioned. This doesn’t support the argument that such people are otherwise normal and well adjusted.

    Log in to Reply
    1. LIBtranslator   6 hours ago

      Objectively, it would. But to "both" Climate Cassandras and Satan-Scolding Trumpanzees, the deciding question is "who'd they shoot?"

      Log in to Reply
      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

        No, the deciding question is "How can I use this for political advantage?"

        Log in to Reply
  20. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   6 hours ago

    Regarding the shooting yesterday, so you think this is harmless, Jeffy?

    https://x.com/bill_c10/status/2021895548446413255?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    His mother was a trans activist.

    She helped produce this pathetic, broken, grotesque monster who killed her.

    The Government of Canada made it a crime to help this boy feel comfortable in his own body.

    Every adult in this boy’s life lied to him, saying he was really a girl.

    The disconnect between reality and his delusion drove him to massacre innocents and destroy his own life.

    Log in to Reply
    1. NoVaNick   6 hours ago

      We must ban guns now to protect trans kids (from themselves)!/moms demand action

      Log in to Reply
    2. creech   6 hours ago

      Huh? The big Assoc. Press story in my local newsrag this morning said only that "a woman" was the doer. Perhaps the story was filed before the RCMP gave out more details? Or maybe the AP has a lion to tow?

      Log in to Reply
    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   5 hours ago

      Sacrifices have to be made for the revolution. What are you going to do?

      Log in to Reply
  21. LIBtranslator   6 hours ago

    When this Blonde Trumpanzee Harridan is finally fired, will Reason outbid Fox to hire her as editor? Enquiring sockpuppets wanna know!

    Log in to Reply
    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   5 hours ago

      Fuck off, you anti-Catholic bigot.

      Log in to Reply
  22. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

    'On the one hand, one can understand some of Bondi's frustrations. Committee hearings like yesterday's are largely political theater.'

    Largely?

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

      Libertarians for political theater?

      Log in to Reply
      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

        I will accept a decent political circus.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Dillinger   5 hours ago

          Iran-Contra was a decent political circus.

          Log in to Reply
  23. Incunabulum   6 hours ago

    This article is just garbage. A bunch of assertions with nothing backing it up.

    >James Van Der Beek, a man of apparent Dutch ancestry

    Ah, I see, it was all just phoned in this morning.

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   6 hours ago

      We're not sure if someone in his family was born in the village of Beek, or if one of them just emerged, immaculate conception-style, from a brook or small stream. Could go either way.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   6 hours ago

        I dont want your jokes (said in a bad Texas accent)

        Log in to Reply
  24. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

    'Even in the face of partisan, showy committee questions, it would be nice to have an attorney general who was modestly professional and interested in transparency.'

    Why?

    In the hyper-partisan clown show level of government we have had for the past couple of decades, perhaps the more that normies get disgusted with all politicians the more likely that something better might come along.

    Log in to Reply
    1. damikesc   5 hours ago

      We had one held in contempt. Reason did not and still does not care.

      Log in to Reply
  25. creech   6 hours ago

    If our congresscreatures can't be bothered to read 2,000 page legislative bills, then why expect DOJ to carefully redact over 3 million pages of documents in a short period of time? Maybe congress should just tell DOJ to release everything without redactions of any alleged victims or perpetrators?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Ron   6 hours ago

      If you claim perpetrators you have to show victims or else everything is hearsay and unfortunately this hurts the victims again. however what should happen is justice finally served but also those who covered for the perpetrators should be punished for their cover up and failure to do their job in teh first place. no matter who is on teh list or failed at doing their job.

      Log in to Reply
    2. Medulla Oblongata   4 hours ago

      We have to release the files to see what's in them.

      Log in to Reply
  26. LIBtranslator   6 hours ago

    "Larry Sharpe is running for public office again." There went the LP's hope of getting 0.01 percent of the vote--to the great relief of Jesus Caucus Trumpanzees!

    Log in to Reply
  27. Minadin   5 hours ago

    The FBI tracked down an anonymous 4chan conspiracy theorist because of claims he made about Epstein.

    It might be worth noting that he stated specific (and true) details about his death a few hours before it was even announced that he had died.

    Log in to Reply
  28. Incunabulum   5 hours ago

    >Even in the face of partisan, showy committee questions, it would be nice to have an attorney general who was modestly professional and interested in transparency.

    1. 'Professional' got us to where we are today Britches. If your rules led to this, of what good are your rules?

    2. She just released a whole tranch - but you want *more* transparency?

    Log in to Reply
  29. Dillinger   5 hours ago

    >>Pam Bondi snaps at Congressmen.

    Pam Blondi embarrassed some Congressmen.

    Log in to Reply
  30. Dillinger   5 hours ago

    >>She called ranking member Rep. Jamie Raskin (D–Md.) a "washed-up loser lawyer" and Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) a "failed politician" with "Trump derangement syndrome."

    are you on her because she went so light on these douchebags?

    Log in to Reply
    1. damikesc   5 hours ago

      No, she offended his precious sensibilities.

      Reason: No longer libertarian and now no longer containing any males.

      Log in to Reply
  31. Bubba Jones   5 hours ago

    Analyzing viewer numbers of the half time show is a fool's errand.

    How many people are watching at someone else's house?

    How many people tuned in to hate watch?

    How many people were disappointed? How many people wish they had watched it instead of discount Milli Vanilla Ice?

    It says more about the opinions people formed before the show than it does about their opinions *of* the show.

    Log in to Reply
  32. Dillinger   5 hours ago

    >>A problem of one's own making.

    the problem was made by the Rulers and their pedo coverup

    Log in to Reply
  33. Dillinger   5 hours ago

    >>James Van Der Beek

    Varsity Blues is one of the best.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Ajsloss   3 hours ago

      Kilmer is going to outlive them all.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Dillinger   43 minutes ago

        the coach in my life Kilmer represents is about 80 now

        Log in to Reply
  34. Dillinger   5 hours ago

    ... also long live Bud Cort.

    Log in to Reply
  35. damikesc   5 hours ago

    DEI News:

    Judge in Louisville gives a convicted rapist a MUCH lower sentence than was being requested. She said he did not have a chance in life because he is young and society is so bad for young black men.

    In the trial, she told him he was going to be respectful and he responded by telling her to, and this is a quote, "Eat my dick".

    Later in the hearing, we had this gem:
    "Judge: As a young Black man, you didn't really have opportunities.
    Convict: Yes, I did.
    Judge: And you didn't really know what you were doing.
    Convict: No, I did. Really, I did. Why y'all keep saying that?
    Judge: And you have such a regret for your actions.
    Convict: Nah, that sh*t was fun, for real. Can I do it again?
    Judge: Such a kind young man.
    Convict: I'd do it again, right now. Where she at? Can I r*pe you too?
    Judge: Just such a misunderstood creature.
    Convict: I just love r*ping and kidnapping people.
    Judge: So touching.
    Convict: I can't wait to start r*ping people in prison.
    Judge: I'm really looking forward to seeing your rehabilitation.
    Convict: I'm really looking forward to them booty cheeks."

    Needless to say, the judge STILL gave him a much-reduced sentence. But, hey, she's a DEI expert and graduated from a law school with a, well, 70% acceptance rate.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Dillinger   5 hours ago

      *not suitable for Court Cam

      Log in to Reply
    2. See.More   4 hours ago

      No link? Sounds like ChatGPT fantasy.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Minadin   3 hours ago

        https://www.wkyt.com/2026/02/09/he-fell-through-cracks-jefferson-co-judge-cuts-jurys-sex-assault-sentence-recommendation-half/

        Log in to Reply
      2. Outlaw Josey Wales   3 hours ago

        The nice young man jumped in her car, abducted her, raped her, made her drive to her ATM and drain it, then raped her again.

        Roads Scholar.

        Log in to Reply
        1. damikesc   2 hours ago

          And the judge did not think that was a huge problem because the poor baby angel Aladdin was a black guy.

          Log in to Reply
  36. MWAocdoc   5 hours ago

    "When asked follow-up questions about those files, Bondi broke down."

    One of the great outcomes of all this is the realization that Teflon Don's minions do not enjoy the coverage of his personal magnetism that allows him to attack randomly and get away with it. Bondi may be starting to realize that she is no Donald Trump. The Donald may be starting to realize that his minions are not serving his aspirations of Empire as well as he might have hoped.

    Log in to Reply
  37. Dillinger   5 hours ago

    >>Johnathan Haidt is in The Free Press taking a victory lap for popularizing the case against youths' smartphone use.

    is the piece titled Suck it, ENB! lol

    Log in to Reply
  38. See.More   5 hours ago

    . . . revive true religion in America. . .

    Which one(s)?

    Log in to Reply
  39. damikesc   5 hours ago

    Russia has proposed returning to the US dollar.

    That seems to be basically it for BRICS.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Ajsloss   3 hours ago

      Can you blame them? Their ruble was turned to rubble.

      Log in to Reply
  40. Dillinger   4 hours ago

    ... also Thomas Massie is a retard wtf is wrong with you, Kentucky?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Super Scary   4 hours ago

      He said he was going to name names from the Epstein files on Monday and then when Monday rolled around, he said it was against the rules to do that.

      He's really harping on this Epstein stuff because it's the first time anyone has paid attention to him.

      Log in to Reply
      1. damikesc   2 hours ago

        As I said earlier, he does have the Speech and Debate clause to protect him.

        Log in to Reply
  41. Super Scary   4 hours ago

    https://x.com/RepMichaelCloud/status/2021981251276886373

    Apparently you need a photo ID to vote in the House.

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   3 hours ago

      Won't somebody think of all the married women in Congress who are too stupid to realize that we don't live in 12th Century England?!

      Log in to Reply
  42. Marshal   4 hours ago

    it would be nice to have an attorney general who was modestly professional and interested in transparency.

    At some point we will undoubtedly return to AGs who corrupt their office to lie about evidence supporting international conspiracy theories specifically designed to influence elections, so we've got that going for us.

    Reason will consider this an improvement by noting at least the corruption is robust and well coordinated.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Use the Schwartz   3 hours ago

      "the corruption is robust and well coordinated."

      Y'know traditional.

      Dems can conserve with the best of them, it just needs to align with the prevailing winds.

      Log in to Reply
    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   3 hours ago

      Within norms.

      Log in to Reply
  43. damikesc   2 hours ago

    Hmm, NM Sec of State --- shockingly enough --- disqualified the Republican candidate for US Senate from the ballot.

    More of that "saving democracy" bullshit, I suppose.

    Soros is getting what he paid for.

    Log in to Reply
  44. Roberta   1 hour ago

    representatives pressed Bondi on why material on Epstein's associates was redacted, but the names, pictures, and other sensitive information of victims were not.

    Easy answer there, in the form of a question back: What do the victims offer? Epstein's associates were Epstein's associates because they had something to trade.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

After Public Backlash, Tom Homan Says Feds Will End Immigration Enforcement Surge in Minnesota

C.J. Ciaramella | 2.12.2026 3:12 PM

Washington Built Big Health Care. Now It Wants To Break It Up.

Jack Nicastro | 2.12.2026 1:50 PM

States and Local Governments Are Still Sitting on Billions of Dollars of 'Emergency' COVID Relief

Eric Boehm | 2.12.2026 1:35 PM

Do Construction Workers Have Fourth Amendment Rights? A Federal Court Will Decide.

Agustina Vergara Cid | 2.12.2026 12:40 PM

DHS Said It Was Targeting the 'Worst of the Worst' in Maine. It Swept Up Asylum Seekers and Noncriminals.

C.J. Ciaramella | 2.12.2026 12:21 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks