The House Just Reclaimed Its Tariff Power From Trump. Now Congress Can Try To Strike Down His Canada Tariffs.
Three Republicans defected to vote down an arcane procedural rule that would have made it impossible for the House to vote on Trump’s tariffs until August.
President Donald Trump's tariffs may now be challenged in the House following the death of House Resolution 1042 on Tuesday night. The resolution included a procedural measure that would have prevented the House from voting until August to terminate the national emergencies that Trump has used to impose "reciprocal tariffs." Now, the House will likely vote on Wednesday on House Joint (H.J.) Resolution 72, which, like its companion measure in the Senate that passed last April, seeks to end the national emergency Trump declared last February and roll back the tariffs subsequently imposed on Canadian goods.
The vote on H.R. 1042, originally scheduled for 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, was pushed back to 8:30 p.m. due to a combination of wariness and opposition from Reps. Tom McClintock (R–Calif.), Victoria Spartz (R–Ind.), Kevin Kiley (R–Calif.), Don Bacon (R–Neb.), and Thomas Massie (R–Ky.). Spartz, Kiley, and Massie all voted against a similar resolution in September. McClintock, while initially part of their coalition at that time, ultimately voted for that resolution. He caved this time, too.
McClintock said he remains "a tariff skeptic," but voted to pass Tuesday's resolution, defending his decision by saying "it would be unwise to alter the status quo until we know the full scope and implications of the decision." While Spartz told The Hill earlier on Tuesday that "we need to stop waiting for the Supreme Court," Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) apparently persuaded her to join McClintock in voting for the resolution.
But Republican leaders could not persuade Kiley, Bacon, and Massie to vote "yes." Massie defended his decision to break from party ranks as "defend[ing] the Constitution," which vests "taxing authority…in the House of Representatives, not the Executive." Similarly, Bacon said he must "answer to Article I," which grants Congress exclusive power to regulate international commerce and impose taxes.
Beginning in February 2025 with his tariffs against Canada and Mexico, Trump has invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to authorize his unilateral modification of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. Trump used IEEPA in April, and again last summer, to impose his not-so-reciprocal tariffs on imports from all around the world, the burden of which has been almost entirely borne by Americans.
Unsurprisingly, to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Trump had to declare a national emergency. Such emergencies are subject to congressional review.
The National Emergencies Act, which Trump invoked alongside IEEPA in his executive order imposing tariffs on Canadian imports, requires that Congress shall convene to determine whether the emergency shall continue "no later than six months after a national emergency is declared and for every six-month period the emergency remains active thereafter," explains the Congressional Research Service. Accordingly, IEEPA provides that its authorities "may not continue to be exercised…if the national emergency is terminated by the Congress."
Republicans avoided complying with this unambiguous requirement by redefining what qualifies as a "day" in the congressional calendar.
In March 2025, House Republicans passed House Resolution 211, which declared that "each day…shall not constitute a calendar day for purposes of…the National Emergencies Act." This allowed Trump's February 2025 tariffs to remain in place until January 3 of this year. In April 2025, Republicans inserted nearly identical language in House Resolution 313 to prevent a vote through September on the "Liberation Day" emergency that Trump used to impose "reciprocal" tariffs. Then, in September, Republicans repeated the procedural gimmick by passing House Resolution 707 to stall a vote on that national emergency until January 31.
Nearly two weeks since the end of the Republicans' National Emergencies Act loophole, Trump's updated "reciprocal" tariff rates should be exposed to congressional scrutiny. Now they are, thanks to the Republicans who ended their colleagues' cowardly bid to save themselves from painful votes.
But Tuesday's vote was only half of the battle. Now, if Congress wants to put an end to Trump's national emergency and accompanying tariffs on Canadian goods, the House will need to pass H.J. 72, and then both chambers will have to assemble supermajorities to overturn Trump's inevitable veto of their joint resolutions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
WTF is wrong with people? Especially reason writers.
Lying sacks of fuck with nothing better to do than sling hate and lies because the truth is too good for them?
Citing another reason article that is completely wrong does not make this article's lies somehow correct.
What tariffs against Canada? The tariffs are all part of the massive trade agreements made over many decades and are in the USMCA.
Is congress now going to open and up and rework USMCA? Of course because they were alredy scheduled to do so beginning in July 2026.
How dare you challenge the lived (i.e. invented) experience truth of Reason writers!
Whats hilarious is that some of us kept telling Reason in their tariffpocalypse articles that congress could always vote against the tariffs implemented, as part of theblaw that was utilized. They chose not to. Instead reason screamed imperial presidency.
(shhh don't tell them Massie doesn't have the juice to override a veto)
reality doesn't sit well with reason. They need to hire captain obvious
A little research would go a long way. Isn't that the job of a journalist?
Who does these headlines?
What actually happened is they had a meeting to schedule the pre-meeting.
And the pre meeting was for the meeting to decide what color the binders for their file holders would be.
So they scheduled a meeting for the Future Planning Committee.
But Tuesday's vote was only half of the battle. Now, if Congress wants to put an end to Trump's national emergency and accompanying tariffs on Canadian goods, the House will need to pass H.J. 72, and then both chambers will have to assemble supermajorities to overturn Trump's inevitable veto of their joint resolutions.
So, nothing changes.
Trump never had tariff power from Congress. What Trump is doing is illegal. Also voting down a procedural rule is not the same as voting for and passing the opposite law.
MollyGodiva
Is.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die, 混蛋.
A reply that uses all of the available MAGA brainpower.
Still more than you have.
Do you get all squishy when you type "MAGA"?
Can you do physical comedy too? We could do a show where you spout your nonsense, then I throw you down a flight of stairs while correcting you.
Hilarity ensues.
The last President to sign a legally enacted tariff bill was Herbert Hoover!
What a great system.
When the democrats are in the majority, democrat policies reign.
When the republicans are in the majority, democrat policies reign.
>>The House Just Reclaimed Its Tariff Power From Trump.
headline several measures premature.
Massie defended his decision to break from party ranks as "defend[ing] the Constitution," which vests "taxing authority…in the House of Representatives, not the Executive."
Good to see a couple critters still have a nutsack.
broken showboat clock still correct twice daily
A rare but welcome setback for the tyrannical Speaker of the House! Unfortunately, this is likely to be the only bright spot in an otherwise dismal news week. I do think, however, that it is premature to announce that the House has "reclaimed" its tariff power. That will happen only if the House actually votes to overrule Trumps tariffs, don't you think?
I was wrong! A grand jury in the District of Columbia refusing to indict the Seditionist Six is another bright spot!
It’s not quite the setback that the article makes it out to be.
I’d probably give Trump a reasonable deadline to come up with a definitive trade deal with Canada and if nothing happens, they should kill the tariff.
As much as the left opposes anything Trump does by default, they do have to mind the union.
Tariffs on China and their belligerent allies should mostly remain, especially if they kill jimmy lai. Sorry, some lines have to be drawn. Canada is so fucked right now I’d sigh and give them low tariffs as a measure of mercy.