Democrats Advance 7 Bills Restricting Gun Rights in the Virginia State Senate
They’re not getting the whole “shall not be infringed” part of the U.S. and Virginia constitutions.
The Second Amendment states, and the Virginia Constitution repeats, that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Someone ought to tell the Virginia state Senate. This week, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee advanced seven bills that shall infringe on one of Americans' most sacred and important rights.
Senate Bill (S.B.) 749, introduced by state Sen. Saddam Salim (D–Merrifield), outlaws the importation, sale, and possession of "assault firearms," which the Virginia Code defines as "any semi-automatic center-fire rifle or pistol…equipped at the time of the offense with a magazine which will hold more than 20 rounds of ammunition or designed by the manufacturer to accommodate a silencer or equipped with a folding stock." Those who violate this prohibition will be barred from legally owning a firearm for three years and face a Class 1 misdemeanor, which carries a maximum fine of $2,500 and up to one year in jail.
Salim's bill also outlaws "large capacity ammunition feeding devices," which are merely magazines with a capacity of over 10 rounds. Such magazines are very popular: Of the 963 million magazines produced for the commercial market from 1990 to 2021, 717 million held 11 or more rounds, according to a report published by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, a firearms trade association. As with possession of an assault firearm, the penalty for owning a magazine that holds 11 or more rounds instead of 10 would be a Class 1 misdemeanor, but without the three-year prohibition on firearm ownership.
S.B. 272, introduced by state Sen. R. Creigh Deeds (D–Charlottesville), would make it illegal to carry a firearm within "any building owned or leased by the Commonwealth," as well as the Capitol, and Capitol Square. This is the same square where the Virginia Citizens Defense League gathered nearly 1,000 gun rights activists one week after the bill's introduction. A violation would result in confiscation of the firearm and a Class 1 misdemeanor. S.B. 312, introduced by state Sen. Adam Ebbin (D–Alexandria), bans Virginians from carrying most firearms, loaded or unloaded, in "any other place of whatever nature that is open to the public," violations of which are treated as a Class 1 misdemeanor. This is a major departure from the current law, which generally allows lawful gun owners to carry even loaded assault firearms in public, excluding select counties and cities.
Carrying restrictions could also apply to motorists.
S.B. 496, introduced by state Sen. David Marsden (D–Burke), makes it a crime to leave a handgun in your car's trunk unless it is "in a locked hard-sided container…permanently affixed to the vehicle's interior." (Locked glove compartments and center consoles would qualify as such containers under the current text of the bill.) This means that if you're a responsible gun owner who leaves your unloaded pistol in a locked, hard-sided carrying case in a locked trunk, and you step inside a gas station to get a bottle of water for the road, you would be guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor (a $250 fine). Meanwhile, S.B. 115, introduced by state Sen. Stella Pekarsky (D–Centreville), would likely reduce Virginia's reciprocity agreements, which allow people to carry with all out-of-state permits.
Even Virginians who have no interest in carrying their weapon in public are targeted by two bills advanced in the Senate.
S.B. 348, introduced by state Sen. Jennifer Boysko (D–Herndon), makes it a Class 4 misdemeanor for gun owners with children to store their firearms loaded unless they are "stored in a biometric storage device" inaccessible to the minor. S.B. 323, introduced by Ebbin, would outlaw the manufacture and possession of firearms made at home or with a 3D printer that are "not detectable…by the types of detection devices, including X-ray machines, commonly used at airports." Violating this bill would constitute a Class 5 felony, which typically carries a one- to 10-year prison sentence. The bill would also outlaw the possession of "a firearm or any completed or unfinished frame or receiver that is not imprinted with a valid serial number," a second infraction of which would be treated as a Class 4 felony: two to 10 years of prison and a fine of up to $100,000.
Virginia has a proud history of liberty, which is codified in its Declaration of Rights, penned by George Mason, and in its official motto, sic semper tyrannis: thus always to tyrants. In light of the restrictive gun bills advanced in the state Senate this week, it may be time for Virginia to update its motto to semper tyrannis: tyrants forever.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
"Virginia has a proud history of liberty . . . "
That was then, this is now.
Behold the "internal refugee".
(it is amazing how many Va Tech stickers I see on cars with Florida plates)
Liberty is fascism!
Oh, we are expecting the Democrats to care about words on paper now? They never have before.
>Virginia has a proud history of liberty
VA has a long and proud history of slavery. Which the Democrats supported and still support.
So the moderate Democrats that Reason celebrated turned out to be as crazy as Mamdani? Wow. I'm stunned. Nobody would be stupid enough to claim that the socialist adults in the room only cared about affordability. Except Reason editors of course.
They should be ashamed that they shilled for these assholes.
They've gone completely crazy with their definitions in that bill, too. And while it's the worst of a bad lot, there are a lot, A LOT of other bills they're introducing that are nearly as bad.
It's almost like having Democrats / progressives anywhere near the levers of power is an absolutely terrible idea these days - that's how far gone they have become.
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2013350008733487510
"Not as bad as Trump deporting people" - Reason
Vote for fascists, get fascism.
Expand ranked-choice voting.
[smirks]
Obviously the DNC is doing this because it's how you get more parties. More diverse and moderate political viewpoints. They're totally not doing it as a means to make the candidate registration and vote tabulation process more convoluted as a cover for manipulation.
Totally.
Just ignore that in cities and states where RCV and 'Jungle Primaries' got implemented, the choices in the general elections ended up being between a far-left Democrat and a radically progressive Democrat-Socialist.
That's just coincidental.
In a Left-voting district, the far-Left candidate has better chances in a partisan primary, usually dominated by motivated hard-core activists. Under the non-partisan "jungle-primary" system, moderate, libertarian, and conservative voters can cast meaningful votes for the saner of two Democrats in the general election runoff. (2) Especially for the preliminary "jungle" round, parties ( including minor ones) should be able to mark their endorsements on the ballot, perhaps through a convention system. A party could endorse more than one candidate.
I love how Reason championed this sheer idiocy.
Oxford,UK has decided to authorize 15 minute cities with penalties if you drive outside of your area. You get 100 days of driving a year.
That conspiracy theory is, as usual, balls-on accurate. The "elites" want to restrain where you can and cannot go.
Hmm, with government contracts of less than $100,000, white men cannot even have their bids considered unless there is literally no other competetion.
Reason does not care.
They seek to give subsidies to allow government employees to have unlimited grants to buy houses.
Reason does not care.
They seek to lower penalties for rapists, removing mandatory prison sentences for both rape AND manslaughter.
Reason does not care.
They are starting up tax benefits for home-based child care services. With MN very much in mind.
Reason does not care.
They ban hand-counting ballots.
Reason does not care.
While running on affordability, they have tripled energy bills.
Reason does not care.
They are moving their taxes to be higher than California.
Reason does not care.
This, Reason, is the Marxist whore you pimped as "moderate".
Reason can only do so much. Why don't you research and write up a libertarian article and submit it to Reason for publication?
I'd submit to a libertarian publication, not this shithole.
Whenever I get pissed at Republicans and plot a strategy to help get Libertarian candidates on the ballot in swing districts to draw votes from them and defeat them, the Democrats do something to scare me and abandon any plans that could lead to Democratic victory. Yeah, the Republicans are scary. But, the Democrats with their Stalinesque policies are worse.
Also, I hear lefties calling Republicans fascists. If they really believed that, they should be buying guns and opposing gun-control.
"Of the 963 million magazines produced for the commercial market from 1990 to 2021, 717 million held 11 or more rounds . . ."
That's less than 3 magazines per person, assuming that's just the US figure. Seems low. I have more than that per firearm. Of course, I suppose there are some people (like my father) who would own magazines that are more than 35 years old and still in good operable condition.
Heck, we have a box of extra magazines, clips, and a few knives. It's next to the box of cords, so we are prepared if someone needs to plug in a TI calculator from the 70s or borrow a magazine for a .40 Glock subcompact.
a magazine for a .40 Glock subcompact
Unless it's extended, depending on the number of people I have to kill, I might go with the TI power cable.
Is that TI cord licensed?
How are those Moderate Democrats treating you?
...because; that's what [D]emon-crap does.
With a topping-of ... but it's all Trumps fault [WE] do it.
They just want to put an end to all the school shootings and gang violence in the ghettoes of Richmond. whats wrong with that?
...they don't see the irony in [WE] Identify-as RULES (collective w/Guns) is the very foundation of gang violence.
As-if the Socialist Utopia's gang-violence rate itself wasn't enough evidence.
True believers that if-only their [WE] Identify-as '[D]emocracy' gets to RULE obsolete without a Peoples Supreme Law over them then all will be well.
The Dems stopped pretending it was about gang violence.
Note their disproportionate focus on non-Islamic right wing terror.
Previous high courts have shown that constitutional rights are, in reality, simply privileges. Once it was determined that 5 justices were the ultimate arbiters of all law and had the power to define the Constitution, including the powers of the other two branches, the idea that the rights was dead. Overturning any constitutional right hinges simply on the ideological makeup of the court.
Where did you get this idea?
About the time Liberal Justices started making opinions-of-the-court that had absolutely ZERO, NONE, NODDA reference to the Constitution.
You can almost bet if a Justice was elected by a [D]emon-crap they won't add any reference to the Constitution what-so-ever. RINO'S have their fair-share in this treasonous activity as well like Alito using "drugs, prostitution and moral standards" as reference instead of the 4A Roe v Wade was originally founded on.
You missed the proposed "landed gentry" Bill. The proposal is the ban the shooting of firearms on property under 5 acres. If you own 4 acres out in the mountain too bad.
Gun grabbers gonna grab guns.
"Democrats Advance 7 Bills Restricting Gun Rights in the Virginia State Senate."
You misspelled "confiscation."