Review: D.C.'s $500 Million Shrine to Capitalism
The new Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream in Washington, D.C., sidesteps its founder's complicated history.
The brand-new Milken Center for Advancing the American Dream is weirdly evasive about capitalism's messy entanglement with the state. One might have expected that topic to come up, given the museum's location: It's a $500 million shrine to capitalism directly across the street from the White House, in what used to be Riggs Bank, a financial institution brought down by accusations of money laundering and other regulatory violations.
That evasiveness is especially striking given the founder's own biography: a financier whose "junk bonds" helped fuel massive economic change, who was then prosecuted and punished before being pardoned by a populist president. There are plenty of inspiring tales of entrepreneurship and grit on display in the glossy, gorgeous displays. There's a much more interesting, complicated story about capitalism hiding in Michael Milken's arc alone, but the museum mostly sidesteps it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
One could say this and that... Pardoned by a populist president? Michael's Milken' shit, and Michael's Milken' shit good and hard! His milk-cash cow looks like this!
(Scroll down a page)
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0310/S00003.htm
It's my understanding that his prosecution was political at the behest of the cronies who he was upsetting, because they were old fogies running inefficient businesses and he saw ways to make better use of the resources they were tying up. Wasn't Giuliani the federal prosecutor who went after him? Didn't governments change their laws to make it easier to prosecute him and easier for the old money to retain their grip on shoddy businesses?
Whenever I read of government prosecuting businesses, my first instinct is to wonder whose ox got gored. They got Madoff apparently legitimately, but way late, and I always wondered who he had been paying off.