Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Only Time Will Tell

Plus: Zohran's universal child care wins support, Harvard's screwed, Minneapolis won't keep kids in school, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 1.9.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and former U.S. President Donald Trump, in front of a Venezuelan flag. | Illustration: Lex Villena; Пресс-служба Президента Российской Федерации,  CNP/AdMedia
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Пресс-служба Президента Российской Федерации, CNP/AdMedia)

"Only time will tell," said President Donald Trump, in response to questions about how long the United States expects to help run Venezuela following Nicolás Maduro's ouster. "We will rebuild it in a very profitable way," said the president. "We're going to be using oil, and we're going to be taking oil. We're getting oil prices down, and we're going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need."

Trump also announced via Truth Social this morning that he has "cancelled the previously expected second Wave of Attacks, which looks like it will not be needed" due to Venezuela's "cooperation." Trump also said that Venezuela "is releasing large numbers of political prisoners as a sign of 'Seeking Peace,'" which he called "a very important and smart gesture."

Next week, Trump will meet with opposition leader María Corina Machado, with whom he's had a complicated relationship since being passed over for the Nobel Peace Prize. (It was given to her instead, and she's been sufficiently obsequious in the aftermath, trying to smooth over the relationship; Trump claims his hurt feelings have nothing to do with his antagonism toward Machado.) It would be "be very tough for [Machado] to be the leader, because she doesn't have the support within or the respect within the country," Trump told reporters yesterday. Hopefully, Machado and Trump will be able to iron out their differences, since the profoundly corrupt Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro's vice president for the past six years, is currently in charge of Venezuela. (Reason's César Báez calls Rodríguez the "acting dictator" and is not so bullish on Venezuela's post-Maduro future if Rodríguez stays in command.)

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Hochul committed to giving Mamdani everything he wants: Like a step-parent trying to curry favor with the kids, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has decided her posture toward Mayor Zohran Mamdani is simply to give him everything he wants—budget be damned. That's one way to do it, I suppose.

It looks like the Mamdani will get closer to enacting his vision of universal free (or, as I like to call it, taxpayer-funded, so not free at all) child care for children as young as 6 weeks by first expanding the universal pre-K program from covering 3- and 4-year-olds to covering all 2-year-olds.

Big news from Gov. Kathy Hochul on child care. She will announce today that she's "committing to fully fund the first two years" of Zohran Mamdani's implementation of free preschool for 2-year-olds: pic.twitter.com/KmozPhqZhL

— Emma G. Fitzsimmons (@emmagf) January 8, 2026

But, as I wrote for the February/March magazine issue, "universal 3-K (for 3-year-olds) hasn't served families as well as its supporters promised it would. It distorted the private market, driving day cares out of business. Rich families have used nifty hacks to get their kids into the best centers, while the poor are left with the rest. The universal nature of it might be politically valuable when you're currying favor with the tony Park Slope crowd, but it means that child care for rich people is subsidized by the slightly richer, and that day cares serving the poorest neighborhoods don't get what they need. Parents who choose to stay home with their kids or employ nannies get shafted, and costs for all forms of child care are driven up the more the government intervenes in the market. More government involvement won't make that better."

"The city actually doesn't have money in its budget to do everything for everyone," Andrew Rein, president of the Citizens Budget Commission, pointed out to The New York Times in August. Mamdani has yet to learn this, and Hochul appears to be positioning herself as his sugar mommy.


Scenes from New York: 


QUICK HITS

  • Federal law enforcement shot two people on Thursday afternoon in East Portland, according to the Portland Police Bureau. The two were hospitalized, but no information about their condition was immediately available, reports KGW8.
  • "Iran's supreme leader vowed on Friday that the government 'will not back down' in the face of protests that have rocked the country in recent weeks, accusing demonstrators of being vandals who were trying to 'please' President Trump," reports The New York Times. "'There are people whose job is only about destruction,' Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a defiant, televised speech in Tehran, the capital." The images coming out of the protests are kind of amazing:

A new trend has emerged among Iranian women. pic.twitter.com/G038L2URrd

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) January 8, 2026

  • A good read: "What Betty Friedan got wrong about motherhood," by Nadya Williams at The Dispatch. 
  • "Two weeks ago I gave my last lecture at Harvard, where I have been a history professor for forty years," writes James Hankins for Compact. "My four decades of experience at one of the world's leading universities have given me a unique vantage point to trace the replacement of Western history by global history. This change is part of the reason why the younger generation finds itself in a state of moral and intellectual disorientation.…I believe I can make far better use of my time and experience at my new institutional home—the Hamilton School of Classical and Civic Education at the University of Florida—than at Harvard. The reason why is that the Hamilton School is committed to teaching the history of Western civilization. When late liberal pedagogy replaced Western civilization courses with global history, serious harm was done to the socialization of young Americans. When you don't teach the young what civilization is, it turns out, people become uncivilized."
  • "The Minneapolis public school system canceled classes for the rest of the week in the aftermath of a deadly shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer, as protests featuring tense standoffs with federal agents flared up again Thursday morning," reports Bloomberg. It's unclear to me why school must be canceled in the aftermath of this event. Is it that school administrators, law enforcement, etc. don't believe themselves capable of handling protests? So the idea is to just give in, and ensure people don't congregate? It seems like "cancel school" as the lowest hanging fruit for controlling civil unrest will come with plenty of bad side effects—namely, children not getting much of an education. Either we take educating our young seriously, or we don't.
  • New Substack series—"on caretaking my mom as she nears the end while fighting off the entities who prey on the old"—by my friend, Nancy Rommelmann, called "Musings of the Night Nurse."
  • Self-reflection in Cuba: "We have to start considering that maybe what's wrong in Cuba is our fault as a party."

Díaz-Canel : "Tenemos que empezar a pensar que a lo mejor lo que funciona mal de Cuba es culpa nuestra del partido". pic.twitter.com/XUC4aJAJ3E

— Wall Street Wolverine (@wallstwolverine) January 8, 2026

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Culture War Politics Have Been Costly for This California Town

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupPoliticsVenezuelaNew YorkLatin AmericaTrump Administration
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (407)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    "Only time will tell," said President Donald Trump, in response to questions about how long the United States expects to help run Venezuela following Nicolás Maduro's ouster.

    Just until our attention is needed in Greenland.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      All a distraction from epstein I've been told.

      1. Super Scary   1 month ago

        RFK's inverted food pyramid is also a distraction from Epstein.

        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

          No, everything is a distraction from Epstein.

          1. Ajsloss   1 month ago

            Pyramid orientation is the second most important thing.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

              This comment doesn’t even mention Epstein. Why are you trying to change the subject? *looks side eyed*

            2. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

              Triangles are gay

              1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

                Does jeffsarc know?

                1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

                  Not much.

              2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

                I’ve always thought of triangles as like a three -way.

                1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                  Hopefully with a cute girl.

                  1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 month ago

                    Ummm….. 2 cute girls.

                    1. Ajsloss   1 month ago

                      Only an obtuse person would settle for two acute girls.

                    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

                      What’s your angle here?

                    3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                      90 degrees?

                2. Zeb   1 month ago

                  It's not gay if it's in a 3-way.

                  1. Vernon Depner   4 weeks ago

                    If there's two guys, it's a gang-bang, not a three-way.

  2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

    "Only time will tell,"

    Stupid cut and runners. You can't give the terrorists a timetable.

  3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

    Dems continue to encourage a new winter if love. Lying about Minnesota despite video. Even with mainstream media like NBC news admitting the facts.


    Collin Rugg
    @CollinRugg
    BREAKING: Protesters in NYC call for the hanging of Secretary Kristi Noem and the execution of ICE agents, in footage shared by
    @ScooterCasterNY
    .

    One woman pushed back, saying "two wrongs don't make a right" and was immediately drowned out.

    The mob also started chanting "F*ck Charlie Kirk."

    "Kristi Noem will hang... Save a life, kill an ICE... F**k Charlie Kirk."

    Wow.
    https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/2009415008305008931

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Now why are they doing this? Well to hide their fraud. Take Mayor Frey for example...

      Apple Lamps
      @lamps_apple
      Sarah Clarke, Mayor Jacob Frey’s wife, worked for Hylden Advocacy & Law. Hylden Advocacy & Law provided legal and lobbying representation to Feeding Our Future ($250 million food aid fraud). Hylden is also listed as a paid lobbyist on a Somali Museum founded by Osman Ali (museum received $4.5 million months after the owner plead guilty to fraud)

      Clarke left Hylden’s firm in January when the investigation took off. Clarke’s exit was abrupt and without explanation, leaving many unanswered questions...

      At least eight people named in the indictment donated $1,000, the maximum allowable contribution, to Frey’s 2021 mayoral campaign.

      Three of Mayor Frey’s appointees were federally indicted.

      Abdi Nur Salah, a former senior policy aide to then-Council Member Abdi Warsame, moved up the City Hall ranks into the role of Frey’s senior policy aide in 2018

      Sharmarke Issa was appointed by Frey to chair the housing authority in 2019 and reappointed in 2021.

      Abdikadir Ainanshe Mohamud was appointed by Frey to the newly created Minneapolis Community Safety Workgroup.

      1. Super Scary   1 month ago

        If they do get riots in MN, I bet you dollars to donuts that a lot of these fraudulent facilities are going to mysteriously lose all their records in a fire.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

          DoJ apparently has agents there now going through records and finding records that dont exist or are back dated records.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

            "In Minnesota, they were just caught forging documents, trying to cover their tracks," Watters said, referring to the report from the Minnesota Office of the Legislative Auditor (OLA), which said that government employees were backdating and creating documents during their audit to cover up mismanagement at Minnesota's DHS. The OLA wrote in a summary of their audit, "We received the full cooperation of staff from DHS and BHA while performing this audit. However, during the course of our audit, we identified a number of documents that BHA either backdated or created after our audit began."

            1. BYODB   1 month ago

              Did they really receive full cooperation if they were forging documents during the audit?

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          MN should be put under martial law.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Amd the 501 groups behind ice watch and these protests? The remaining funding groups for democrats. Such as the group behind the woman shot in Minnesota. Funded by soros, tides, and.... taxpayers.

      https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/2009387424342831233.html

      The usual democrats fund 501. 501 become their supporters and funders. Usaid all over again.

    3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Meanwhile corporate and leftist media continues to push lies, and even reason editors like CJ blindly push them. Such as the lie of ICE turning guns on protestors. When videos show protestors grabbing their weapons.

      https://x.com/Lukewearechange/status/2009129579823460630

      You see media calling the woman a legal observer, not involved with ice watch, just dropped her kids off, was trying to turn around.... all despite videos. Just constant lies.

      Then other retarded journalists like Tim Miller comparing this to the assassination of Kirk.

      Tim Miller
      @Timodc
      Honestly the last time i was this shook was seeing the number of people who were pretty sanguine about a podcaster getting assassinated bc his takes are bad. I guess there are just way more people who are “neutral to pro” on assassination that I realized.

      Welcome to the winter of love.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

        I really like this (somewhat) new designation of certain people as “legal observers”, like they get special privileges over everyone else.

        My niece got a badge maker kit for Christmas, I’m going to have her make me a badge that says it, then just run around town doing whatever the fuck I want, and if anyone calls the cops I can just point to my badge and say “Sorry, I’m a legal observer, you can’t arrest me!”

        I’ll let you all know how it goes.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

          Just takes a half hour at a presentation by ACLU or other leftist groups to get the designation. And outlets like Reason will fall for it.

          Look at how reason screamed freedom of the press with antifa wearing patches while also vandalizing and assaulting officers.

        2. Social Justice is neither   1 month ago

          Make it reversible by putting Journalist on the back and use whichever side is a useful get out of jail free card.

        3. Gaear Grimsrud   1 month ago

          Odd that a legal observer would illegally flee from the cops.

      2. shadydave   1 month ago

        Last I remember from Miller was him touting the Ann Selzer Iowa poll:

        https://youtu.be/P-ysKh_Gyd0?si=dZN_OI3W7-dtgjPw

    4. Idaho-Bob   1 month ago

      And half of the country remains passive. It will be our demise.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        Well, they aren't paid for their activism like the left is. They have actual jobs.

    5. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

      Is this more or less serious than "hang mike pence". Asking for the shit eater who spams that daily.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        Waiting for China Tony to weigh on. Or Jeff to do so, but scale doesnt go high enough for Jeff.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          Fatfuck went scale shopping. He found a model that supported 500 lbs. and said “I’ll take two!”.

    6. Super Scary   1 month ago

      What the fuck does Kirk have to do with any of this? Do they seriously think a political assassination during a public event is in any way comparable to a protester getting vented because they tried to run over someone with their car?

      These people are truly broken, in every sense of the word.

      1. Idaho-Bob   1 month ago

        What the fuck does Kirk have to do with any of this?

        It's a culture war "Fuck You!" to conservatives.
        They just keep poking the bear hoping the bear reacts. And then bitch and moan about the reaction.

        We do need to start punching them in the mouth. Literally and figuratively.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

          And then what? They hit back. You pull out a gun and shoot them. They pull out their guns and shoot you. What is the end result you desire here?

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

            You pull out a gun and shoot them. They pull out their guns and shoot you

            You didn’t think that through.

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

              Jeff ignores his team has already done so.

              Kirk, Portland, trump twice, multiple conservatives run down pre 2020 elections, ice facility, etc.

              Jeff always ignores his side is the agitators. Then will scream NAP if there is any response as if his team didnt already grossly violate the NAP.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                Kirk, Portland, trump twice, multiple conservatives run down pre 2020 elections, ice facility, etc.

                El Paso, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Columbia SC, and now Minneapolis

                1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

                  I find it funny that despite video showing her hitting an officer with her car you compare it to assassination attempts, shooting up ice facilities, etc.

                  You truly are an evil fuck.

                  1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

                    Fatfuck is pure evil.

                  2. ML (now paying)   1 month ago

                    I'm not joking or resorting to hyperbole when I call Jeff evil. The things he excuses and/or supports are straight from the maw of hell.

                  3. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                    Oh I knew you would zero in on the Minneapolis thing while ignoring the others.

                    Fine - let's toss that one out. What about Buffalo, El Paso, Columbia?

                    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                      Let's discuss the harassment these activists have done in Chicago, asshole.

            2. Ersatz   1 month ago

              Plus, lets face it - they dont own guns.... they are 'icky'. Its their POC criminal clients that own the guns... they'll have to subcontract that kind of kinetic action and by then they'll be history.

              1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

                Not anymore. See John Birch Society, antifa, and trans gun groups.

                They still are awful shots, see ice facility, but they are arming up.

                1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

                  So let’s finally get rid of all of them.

              2. Super Scary   1 month ago

                They think only law enforcement should have firearms. They also believe all law enforcement, regardless of race or gender, are evil racist bastards that deserve to be killed for enforcing the law.

                It must be hard being a modern lefty. If I had to uphold conflicting beliefs I would have a headache all day.

            3. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              Of course, the "you" and "they" in my statement above refer to groups of people, not to literal individual people. Normal people who aren't pedantic ADHD assholes like yourself would understand that.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

                Jeffy, YOU are a pedantic, ADHD asshole. You’re Marxist, pedophilic shitweasel too.

              2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

                I took “they” as a pronoun.

            4. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

              Well he’s retarded. And dishonest.

              1. HorseConch   1 month ago

                you beat me to it.

          2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

            Obviously, you’re oblivious to the Chicago way that some of the major heads of the Democrat Party are steeped in.

          3. damikesc   1 month ago

            Dead progressives.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

              Go on……

            2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              Weird how people will spend all day calling me names while those same people will not say one word about you directly advocating for murdering your political opponents.

              1. damikesc   1 month ago

                ...nobody disagrees with killing progressives. A parasitic cancer at best.

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

          Are those bears being poked inside trunks?

      2. Moonrocks   1 month ago

        Because the issue is never the issue.

    7. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

      The radicals on the left say and do some extreme things. The Democratic leaders, by and large, don't reflect those extreme things. No elected Democrat has said to execute Kristi Noem.

      By contrast, the radicals on the right say and do some extreme things, but the Republican leaders amplify and reflect their radicalism. Look at how Trump decided to completely rewrite the narrative about Jan. 6 based on what fringe voices on the right have said. You have members of Congress demanding that Trump invoke the Insurrection Act and arrest Tim Walz.

      Both sides have radicals, but only one side leans into the radicalism in terms of their elected leaders.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

        The Democratic leaders, by and large, don't reflect those extreme things.

        You mean Democrat leaders like Ilan Omar?

        The US government will do what Somalians tell them to do! The US must follow our orders!

        Or Pramila Jayapal?

        We’re training Americans to take down potential Trump dictatorship.

        Or Hakeem Jeffries (aka “Dollar Store Obama”)?

        Or Nancy “stock trader” Pelosi?

        Or Tim “Somali Fraud” Walz?

        Or JB Pritzker?

        Please, go on Jeffy.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

          Which one of them "celebrated" Charlie Kirk's death?
          Which one of them demanded Kristi Noem be executed?
          Which one of them advocated for ICE agents to be killed?
          Answer: none, none and none.

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 month ago

            Have you forgotten the Biden speech labeling half the country domestic terrorists and white supremacists?
            There have been more than a few calls for violence and unrest. What has the response to MN been thus far? A wait for clarity or an accusation of murder with the victim the poor lesbo mom with her wife watching while she contemplated the stuffed animals in her car and wondered why these toxic males were accosting her.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              Have you forgotten the Biden speech labeling half the country domestic terrorists and white supremacists?

              Why yes I have apparently forgotten it because it doesn't exist.

              The actual speech which I think you are referencing made it clear that he wasn't referring to all Republicans or even all conservatives, just the MAGA cultists.

              There have been more than a few calls for violence and unrest. What has the response to MN been thus far? A wait for clarity or an accusation of murder with the victim the poor lesbo mom with her wife watching while she contemplated the stuffed animals in her car and wondered why these toxic males were accosting her.

              You know, at some point, I would hope that people would understand that progressives are ordinary people, just like you and me. Like all people, sometimes they react emotionally to dramatic events. It would be nice if everyone had Vulcan self-control to turn off their emotions from time to time, but that doesn't seem to be a human trait. Instead you have one side saying irresponsible things, like "that ICE agent is absolutely a murderer", and then you have the other side saying irresponsible things, as I quote below, like "it was absolutely self-defense, no doubt, and protestors who are chanting "kill ICE" at protests should be thrown in jail".

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                Then here's a reminder, dipshit.

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JemWkV2Vcic

          2. ML (now paying)   1 month ago

            "Which one of them "celebrated" Charlie Kirk's death?
            Which one of them demanded Kristi Noem be executed?
            Which one of them advocated for ICE agents to be killed?"

            You might want to double-check with Pritzker and Jefferies on that assertion, Lying Jeffy.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              Since you claim to be familiar with their specific statements, why don't you provide a quote and a citation?

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                Let's start with Pritzker blaming Trump for Kirk's death, dipwad.

                https://dailycaller.com/2025/09/10/jb-pritzker-trump-charlie-kirk-death/

                Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker blamed President Donald Trump and the Jan 6 rioters for fueling the political violence that led to the fatal shooting of Turning Point Founder Charlie Kirk Wednesday.

                Kirk died at 31 after being shot during a speech at Utah Valley University. During his speech, Pritzker extended his sympathy to the activist’s family but then quickly turned to Trump.

                “My sympathy to Charlie Kirk’s family and to Charlie Kirk, who obviously has become a target for somebody. I don’t know whether it’s political violence, because I don’t know who did it. I know they seem to have somebody in custody. But I will say that political violence unfortunately has been ratcheting up in this country,” Pritzker said.

                Pritzker blamed Trump’s rhetoric for creating the conditions that encourage violence.

                “We saw the shootings, the killings in Minnesota. We’ve seen other political violence occur in other states. And I would just say it’s got to stop. And I think there are people who are fomenting it in this country,” Pritzker said. “I think the president’s rhetoric often foments it. We’ve seen the January 6 rioters who clearly have tripped a new era of political violence. And the president? What did he do? Pardoned them. I mean what kind of signal does that send to people who want to perpetrate political violence. Not a good one.”

                Never mind it was Pritzker calling Republicans, Nazis. He, like you, is also a pathological liar.

                https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pritzker-swiftly-fact-checked-after-claiming-he-never-derided-gop-dictatorship-comparison-pathological?msockid=01669f1c6d2860a816da8e736c806114

                Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker was swiftly fact-checked by conservatives on social media for claiming he "never called Republicans ‘Nazis’" as lawmakers on both sides of the aisle traded barbs on heightened political rhetoric following the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

                "That is completely false. I have never called Republicans ‘Nazis,’" Pritzker said Monday while fielding questions from the media during a press conference where the Democratic state leader accused President Donald Trump of "actively fanning the flames of division" following Kirk's Wednesday murder.

                "The authoritarian playbook is laid bare here: They point to a group of people who don’t look like you and tell you to blame them for your problems. If you think I’m overreacting and sounding the alarm too soon, consider this: It took the Nazis one month, three weeks, two days, eight hours, and 40 minutes to dismantle a constitutional republic," Pritzker said in February.

                "Governor Pritzker claims he’s never called Republicans Nazis, but his own words suggest otherwise," the Illinois House Republicans posted to X Monday, accompanied by videos comparing the governor's remarks.

                "Pritzker Today: I've never called Republican's Nazi's Pritzker in February: ‘Pritzker Compares Trump Administration’s Approach to Nazi Germany During State Budget Address,’" the Illinois Republican Party similarly posted to X.

                Critics slammed the governor as "pathological" and a "liar," saying that his public remarks are forever achieved on the internet.

                Others on X pointed to Pritzker's remarks from April during a speech in New Hampshire promoting mass mobilization against Republicans while declaring they "cannot know a moment of peace."

                "Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption — but I am now," he said, Fox News Digital reported at the time.

                "These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace. They have to understand that we will fight their cruelty with every megaphone and microphone that we have. We must castigate them on the soapbox and then punish them at the ballot box. They must feel in their bones … that we will relegate their portraits to the museum halls reserved for tyrants and traitors."

                Go fuck yourself, Jeffy.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                  Neither of those sources prove my claim. Why don't you find a quote which actually tries to prove my claim.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

          By contrast:
          Stephen Miller called the Democratic Party a "domestic extremist organization".
          Karoline Leavitt said that the base of the Democratic Party is terrorists and illegals.
          Trump and his whole cabinet say explicitly that they condemn the entire Somali community in Minneapolis for the alleged fraud of some of them.
          JD Vance and Kristi Noem called Renee Good a "domestic terrorist".

          These are not internet randos, they are people who have power.

          The people in charge on the right amplify and reflect the radicalism. The people in charge on the left tend to contain and mollify the radicalism. That's the difference.

          1. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

            Walz said, "I see the pundits on TV — 'What's wrong with the Democratic Party?' What's wrong is our country is being stolen by fascists and Nazis."

          2. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

            JB Pritzker Compares Trump’s ICE Raids to Nazi Germany: ‘This Is How Authoritarian Regimes Do It’

          3. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

            AOC Calls Trump A Neo-Nazi Days After He's Shot

          4. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

            Talking to CBS’s Face the Nation, Omar said, “When I think about Miller and his white supremacist rhetoric, it reminds me of the way the Nazis described Jewish people in Germany.”

          5. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

            Nancy Pelosi says Trump similar to Mussolini or Hitler

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

              None of these count for Lying Jeffy. He gets to set the specific parameters so that they don’t. One of the many different ways he’s dishonest.

            2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              Yup, a bunch of elected Democrats compared Trump to Hitler. That isn't exactly news. It's also not exactly extreme rhetoric either, not anymore. It probably should be, but it isn't.

              The quotations above, however, was about leftwing radicals demanding that Kristi Noem be executed or that ICE agents be murdered. Which elected Democratic leader has done that?

              1. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

                What do you believe they wish to achive with is language, what are they implying? Do you find it odd they all use they same terms? Do you agree with these characterizations of Trump? Why do you have a double standard regarding factual characterization of domestic terrorists vs bombastic rhetoric of democrats?

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                  Before I answer your questions, can you at least just finally admit that no elected Democrat "celebrated" Charlie Kirk's murder, or advocated for Kristi Noem to be executed, or advocated for ICE agents to be murdered? Just admit that and we can move on.

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                    “Before I answer your questions”

                    Psychopath.

                    1. ML (now paying)   1 month ago

                      Jeff always makes rules, and they're always in his favour, and they only ever apply to you and never him.

                  2. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

                    Everybody knows you aren't going to answer any questions. And you will use any engagement with your strawman to build more strawman.

                    1. rbike   1 month ago

                      He will never answer a question honestly. That is the entire basis of dumbass, lying Jeffy.

                    2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                      See, there is this thing called "dialogue", which requires this back-and-forth conversation. I have already addressed some of your questions above, so before I address any more of your questions I would appreciate the courtesy of a response to mine. If you don't want a dialogue, and you just want to grandstand and/or troll and/or put words in my mouth then just say so.

                    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                      Look at the psychopath go!

                    4. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                      Look at the psychopath go!

                      He's a pathologically lying psychopath.

                    5. Vernon Depner   4 weeks ago

                      I just want to grandstand and/or troll and/or put words in your mouth.

                  3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

                    No. Just answer the questions. We know what you’re doing.

                  4. damikesc   1 month ago

                    Omar did. AOC also went on to the House floor and LIED about him to justify his murder.

                    There is nothing your Dem boos can do to make you upset.

              2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 month ago

                Well, now, there’s some selective nuance for you. Lol.

              3. Marshal   1 month ago

                Yup, a bunch of elected Democrats compared Trump to Hitler. That isn't exactly news. It's also not exactly extreme rhetoric either, not anymore. It probably should be, but it isn't.

                It is extreme, it is not uncommon because almost all Democrats are extremists. No matter what their public branding is the only elected Dem to oppose even the most extreme leftists is Fetterman. Because Dems have built an institutional machine to keep the party moving left their elected officials don't need to incorporate that into their public image.

                Calling people Hitler, or fascist, is urging your most extreme members to take appropriate action including murder. Jeffey doesn't oppose this, he minimizes it so he can continue to pretend he opposes extremism. But there's a reason half of young Dems believe murder is an acceptable political act. Their entire movement has been radicalizing for decades.

            3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

              Jeff doesnt think this is extreme.

              He has also called trump and conservatives hitler. So moderate statements.

              1. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

                Smearing you political oppents as literal hitler = good.
                Calling the groups of people ramming ICE agents with cars and vandalizing federal court houses domestic terrorists = bad.

                Smoothbrain logic.

                1. Super Scary   1 month ago

                  He also says "that isn't exactly news" as if that dismisses the whole thing. That type of inflammatory language that incites people to think they can run people over in cars or shoot at ICE agents is exactly the problem the democrats have.

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                    I do think the Nazi-type rhetoric is irresponsible. I do think that leaders and people with big platforms have a moral obligation to use their platforms wisely and thoughtfully and not just throw around irresponsible rhetoric. But I think that is true on all sides, not just with Democrats. When I criticized Trump for his "vermin" comments, and when I criticized Joe Rogan for uncritically spreading conspiracy theories, I was lambasted around here. So I have been incredibly consistent on this topic. I hope you'll join me in urging influential and powerful people to choose their words more carefully.

                    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                      Except that you excuse any Democrat doing it, asshole.

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                  I did not say it was "good" to smear political opponents as Hitler. In fact I lamented that it was too commonplace. Are you being intentionally dishonest?

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                    He's not the dishonest one here.

          6. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

            Smoothbrains like you hear that rehtoric and think they are fighting the gestapo. They are funded and trained. They attack ICE agents with cars to protect criminal. Yes, the are by the very definition, engaging in acts of domestic terroism.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              *Specifically* who are the "they" in your accusation that you believe are domestic terrorists?

              1. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

                They are marxist agitprop/terrorist groups like antifa, and recently ICE Watch. Do you agree these are groups of people with political agendas? They are funded and organized? They use violence and/or threats of violence to further their political agendas? That using violence to promote political agendas is the very definition of domestic terrorism?

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                  I don't think it is fair to characterize "ICE Watch" as a terrorist group. In fact I am extremely hesitant to label any group of citizens, either on the left or the right, as "terrorists" because that just opens up all sorts of possibilities for the government to abuse its power.

                  From what I have read about "ICE Watch", they are a group of people who document ICE activity and establish legal resources for people who think they are being unfairly or illegally treated by ICE. I don't think that is terrorism. I don't think it is fair to call blocking a street an "act of violence".

                  Also, I have no idea if they are "marxist" or not.

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                    Delusions of grandeur.

                    1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                      Do you disagree with what I wrote above? If so, what is your specific objection, and why?

                    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                      More psychopathic behavior from Lying Jeffy.

                  2. damikesc   1 month ago

                    You did to 1/6 convicts, and they did less than the bitch in Minneapolis did...who actually DID try to murder a law enforcement officer, unlike the entire 1/6 riot.

            2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              And frankly I think libertarians ought to be concerned about a law enforcement agency like ICE which seems to act with impunity and has arrogated unto itself an immense amount of power.

              1. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

                When has ICE acted with impunty? They are constantly under judicial review as advocacy groups have been filing lawsuits since day one. Are there supposed to be extra constitutional restraints on ICE? Is detaining and deporting illegal aliens an abuse of power? Does the federal government not have jursidiction over immigration issues? Does the constitution not grant supremacy to the federal government in this manner?

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                  ICE goes from city to city with high-profile raids using intentionally intimidating tactics. They wear masks and use overwhelming force, more force than is needed for most of what they do. They have been caught lying multiple times about their activities. Example:

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8RuBBieuaE

                  They don't act like police typically do, they act more like a military unit. Look at the Renee Good video - when the ICE officers first approach her car, they are yelling expletives and ordering her around. This is typical from what I have seen. They don't treat people respectfully and they demand everyone submit, not just the people they are pursuing. And, they have, too often, detained US citizens. From the average citizen's point of view, and particularly from a libertarian point of view, I can understand the concerns. And let's remember, most of the people that ICE are apprehending are NOT violent criminals. They are not thugs and gangbangers, they are gardeners and maids. I have to wonder why such an overwhelming use of force is necessary to arrest these types of people.

                  Hope that answers your question.

                  1. damikesc   1 month ago

                    "ICE goes from city to city with high-profile raids using intentionally intimidating tactics. They wear masks and use overwhelming force, more force than is needed for most of what they do. They have been caught lying multiple times about their activities. Example:"

                    ...if cities did not constantly violate federal law by protecting and shielding illegals, none of this would be needed. This is WHY ICE used to do requests to hold a suspect until they could come and pick them up. Blue cities and states decided they were not going to do it.

                    So, overwhelming force is required. Blame your boos.

                    "They don't act like police typically do, they act more like a military unit. Look at the Renee Good video - when the ICE officers first approach her car, they are yelling expletives and ordering her around."

                    Not remotely unusual behavior from police when a suspect is not following orders. Happens, literally, all of the time. She should have followed the orders.

                    Actually, should not have blocked traffic in the first place, nor dropped her "wife" off to film the entire incident (a common act when one is not seeking to cause a conflict). She made all of the decisions that led to her demise.

                    FAFO and all.

                    "They don't treat people respectfully and they demand everyone submit, not just the people they are pursuing."

                    The massive increase in attacks on them, encouraged by Democrat pols, has them a little less patient with people threatening them. They have been threatened to be murdered by people regularly and do not kill them. Nor arrest them. Nor even look at them.

                    "And let's remember, most of the people that ICE are apprehending are NOT violent criminals."

                    Somalia fraud was "not violent". I guess that is why you defend them.

                    Are they here illegally? Yes? Then I do not care WHAT ELSE they did. It is only a civil offense, so due process is not really needed to any appreciable degree.

                    "They are not thugs and gangbangers, they are gardeners and maids. I have to wonder why such an overwhelming use of force is necessary to arrest these types of people."

                    That so many of them end up being gangbangers, rapists, et al is why. I know you do not care --- illegals should not be expected to follow the rules of white folks because they are so inferior to Jeff --- but I do care.

                  2. Marshal   1 month ago

                    They don't act like police typically do, they act more like a military unit. Look at the Renee Good video - when the ICE officers first approach her car, they are yelling expletives and ordering her around.

                    I guess Jeffey didn't see today's videos. The cops are yelling when they approach because she intentionally blocked them with her car while her co-conspirator yelled at the cops. The two women intentionally began the confrontation but Jeffey carefully excludes that information because he's a propagandist only interested in blaming the right and excusing the left.

                    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                      Yeah, it’s pretty damning to the leftist narrative. I wonder how Lying Jeffy will spin this now:

                      https://x.com/AlphaNews/status/2009679932289626385

          7. Marshal   1 month ago

            The people in charge on the left tend to contain and mollify the radicalism.

            This is a lie.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

              I don’t call him Lying Jeffy for nothing.

      2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

        “The Democratic leaders, by and large, don't reflect those extreme things”

        Wow. Just wow.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

          It's true. Name the elected Democrat leader who "celebrated" Charlie Kirk's death, or advocates for ICE agents to be killed, or advocates for Kristi Noem to be executed. Go ahead, name just one.

          By contrast, it is not hard to find Stephen Miller or Karoline Leavitt or JD Vance or Kristi Noem or Trump himself saying horrible and radical things about Democrats.

          1. Idaho-Bob   1 month ago

            You, and the entirety of your party has dehumanized "MAGA" for years. You want 50% of the population dead. Biden's red speech, Watters, Omar, Jeffries, Swalwell, etc.

            Don't play innocent you fucking hypocrite.

            Self-defense is now on the menu. Because you and your kind have forced us to defend ourselves.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

              Post quotes where any of those people declared that they wanted 50% of the population dead. I dare you. You can't because they don't exist.

              Even Biden in his "red speech" made it clear that he was only referring to "ultra MAGA", not every Republican. In fact I seem to recall he got a lot of mockery for inventing that term.

              Truth is, you are *eager* to start murdering Democrats because you just don't want to live with them and you are comfortable with violence to enforce one-party rule. You invent imagined threats against you to rationalize why it's "self defense" but you know those are imaginary and you would murder them all just the same even without those "threats". You really are the fascist.

              1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                “Even Biden in his "red speech" made it clear that he was only referring to "ultra MAGA"”

                Just look at this psychopath go.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                  Okay, that was not the speech where he used the term "ultra MAGA". I apologize for my error. But he did say this:

                  Now, I want to be very clear — (applause) — very clear up front: Not every Republican, not even the majority of Republicans, are MAGA Republicans. Not every Republican embraces their extreme ideology.

                  I know because I’ve been able to work with these mainstream Republicans.

                  But there is no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven, and intimidated by Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans, and that is a threat to this country.

                  https://www.democracyinaction.us/2022/biden090122spt.html

                  So he made it clear that he wasn't talking about every Republican. Do you agree?

                  1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

                    I agree that you’re a lying psychopath.

                2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

                  He really is a communist sociopath.

                3. Social Justice is neither   1 month ago

                  Considering Jeff and the DNC see "ultra MAGA" as anyone that disagrees with them, then it's true. Remember, these are the psychotic cunts that decided being a part of the Catholic Church or a PTA meant you were to be investigated as a domestic terrorist for disagreeing with abortion or manipulating and mutilating children.

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                    "ultra MAGA" as anyone that disagrees with them

                    That is not what I believe.

                    I believe there are some "ultra MAGA" radicalized folks, like Matt Walsh whom I cited elsewhere, who really do want to use state power to "crush the left" in violation of their rights. I would hope everyone here would object to that. I would like to believe that this doesn't represent the majority of MAGA. Even still, I can tell just from the comments on their tweets, that not everyone on the right is on board with such authoritarian use of force, and that is a good thing.

                    Regardless, in Biden's speech, he never condemned all Republicans or wanted all Republicans dead. That is untrue and unfair.

                    being a part of the Catholic Church or a PTA meant you were to be investigated as a domestic terrorist

                    This is a strawman. If you disagree, please point to any evidence whatsoever from a person in some position of authority (i.e. not just some internet rando) who declared that just being a member of the Catholic Church or the PTA made one a terrorist.

              2. Idaho-Bob   1 month ago

                Truth is, you are *eager* to start murdering Democrats because you just don't want to live with them and you are comfortable with violence to enforce one-party rule. You invent imagined threats against you to rationalize why it's "self defense" but you know those are imaginary and you would murder them all just the same even without those "threats". You really are the fascist.

                Projection is a liberal fantasy.
                When your kind act violently, I, and I mean I, will respond violently.

                Block my truck in traffic - I will run you over
                Wave a molotov in my direction - you will take a bullet
                Threaten anyone dear to me - extreme prejudice reaction
                Stand on the sidewalk waving stupid leftist slogans - I'll laugh at you as I drive by.

                Is that clear enough for you? Do you understand the lines?

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

                  That sounds perfectly understandable to me. But what you just posted is different than what you posted above.

                  Above, I interpreted your statement as meaning that you thought "self-defense" (i.e., violence) was justified against any leftie because you believe that leftie was intent on killing you. Even the lefties waving signs on the sidewalk. If you don't believe that, then I am actually relieved.

      3. damikesc   1 month ago

        "Look at how Trump decided to completely rewrite the narrative about Jan. 6 based on what fringe voices on the right have said."

        You mean reality? Curse him!

        "You have members of Congress demanding that Trump invoke the Insurrection Act and arrest Tim Walz."

        1/6 = insurrection. Discussing activating the Natl Guard to arrest ICE agents = no big deal.

        You're a clown.

        Eric Swalwell is calling for "blue states" to arrest ICE agents, mind you, you insipid moron.

        1. Idaho-Bob   1 month ago

          Let's not forget Swalwell's threats to the majority of Americans.

          In response to a tweet asking how he would enforce such a (gun) ban if citizens resisted, noting a potential civil war, Swalwell replied: "And it would be a short war, because we’d win. The government has nukes, they write the laws, and we have the best military in the world".

          1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

            Let's not forget Swalwell had a Chinese spy on his campaign staff, at least, maybe on his personal staff, too, but who can really say?

          2. HorseConch   1 month ago

            I sense a mass desertion if Swalwell enlists his new secretary of defense Mark Kelly to do that.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

          You mean reality?

          lol if you think the current WH propaganda about Jan. 6 is "reality" you are beyond deluded

          Eric Swalwell is calling for "blue states" to arrest ICE agents

          This is his exact quote:

          “Here's what we can do, because we're not helpless, and people may feel helpless, we're not helpless. And tell your leaders they're not helpless. We can strip them of their immunity, and I'm working on doing that in Congress. We can make sure that when we seek to fund them, we don't fund masks and we don't fund them being unidentified. We also can make sure that local prosecutors and attorneys general across the country, particularly in blue states, use your law enforcement authorities. If they're going to falsely imprison people, kidnap people, assault people, commit battery and now murder, prosecute them. They only understand one language. It's either us and the most vulnerable in our communities on our heels or them on their heels. That's the only way to approach this, is to be on offense.”

          https://grabien.com/story?id=565502

          So, he is not asking for "blue states" to just start arresting all of the ICE agents. He is saying that if ICE agents really are breaking the law, then they ought to be held accountable. That sounds like a sensible position to me. Don't you agree?

          1. damikesc   1 month ago

            Your correction was --- I said something 100% accurate. Thanks for wasting everybody's time. Your attempt to debunk what was not said is laughable.

            Jan.6 was nothing. It wouldn't fit in the top 30 riots from the Left this decade. It scared clowns like you because, for the first time, the Right decided to act like the Left.

            It was a mostly peaceful protest. Suck on that.

    8. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Bodycam video of officer hit by Good.

      https://x.com/ClayTravis/status/2009687043950162294

      Wonder what the jeffsarcs and Mike's of the world will say now. Will CJ recent his original agitprop?

      1. HorseConch   1 month ago

        The spin is still coming hard, but the goalposts keep moving.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    ...and we're going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need.

    Hopefully not in the form of bolivars.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    Trump claims his hurt feelings have nothing to do with his antagonism toward Machado.

    BUT WE KNOW HOW HE LIES.

  6. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

    "We're going to be using oil, and we're going to be taking oil....we're going to be giving money to Venezuela, which they desperately need."

    Oil for Food...how could anyone take issue with that? Or is this more like when Clinton provided aid to the NORKS to stop the nukes?

  7. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

    Bring back Sarcasmic!

    (I'm sure I speak for all of us with this request)

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 month ago

      He hasn't left.

      See Fu Manchu

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

        Ah yes, Kung Fu Sarc.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          The Drunken Master himself.

          1. Ersatz   4 weeks ago

            Drunkmaster Fullofhimself?

            Thot I’d try that one out - I was triggered by the similarity although I don’t approve of these types of remarks.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

      Why? Is he gone? I don't usually pay attention to the grey boxes so I would not notice...but now that you mention it there have been fewer grey boxes lately.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        Switched socks.

        I blame Bombas.

      2. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

        Yes, the "sarcasmic" handle has been gone for a few weeks.

        I'm not sure about Fu Manchu, but they have different user #'s and Fu Manchu has been around quite a while.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

          Shrike is infamous for using multiple user numbers and then lying about it. He’s fairly easy to tell on a number of them as he uses the same tics every damn time (“hey peanuts!”). In fact, his most infamous one was making a comeback after getting his original Sarah Palin’s Buttplug account nuked by Readsob.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

            Agree, I was pretty sure Fu was a shrike sock, not Sarc.

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

              Then kung fu started...

              Saint Kirk
              Ya retard (only sarc used that prior)
              Dems did it first

              And every other sarc go to.

              Example.

              https://reason.com/2025/12/16/even-trumps-supporters-are-slamming-his-post-about-rob-reiners-murder/?comments=true#comment-11318756

              Even yesterday he did his usual socialism is okay if trump does it. Something he has screamed multiple times.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

                Yeah, that’s how Fu Manchu made it known he’s just Sarcasmic by another handle. That strawman is so predictable from him.

              2. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

                I don't think sarc could spell "diarrhea".

                1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

                  Autocorrect for him.

    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

      If you’re missing sarc you can just go to your nearest place where bums hang out and talk to them. Bring a couple 40s of Colt 45 and they’ll give you the full experience.

      1. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

        Meh, Sarc without Jesse would be no fun.

    4. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

      I miss him as well.

      I just hope that the 'mean girls' crowd is happy for driving him away. (I am presuming that is why he finally left.)

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

        Of course you miss him. He was the only one buying your bullshit.

      2. damikesc   1 month ago

        I am happy. Fewer gray boxes are always nice.

      3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

        “(I am presuming that is why he finally left.)”

        Why?

      4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

        He’s not gone. But yes, I would be pleased if here were gone. He just derails serious discussion.

      5. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 month ago

        That and the $25 bucks.

      6. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 month ago

        “….,the mean girls crowd….” is the only reason he stuck around as long as he did, you moron. He craved the attention. He could’ve muted his critics at any time (and claimed he did).

        He did say he wouldn’t pay $25 to come here and be abused, which seemed like an odd line to draw in the sand. If you feel that you’re being treated unfairly, what the fuck does $25 matter?

        Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, jeff. Lol.

    5. Zeb   1 month ago

      He's gone. Decided it was time to go when he would have had to pay for the privilege. I know him personally and he told me. I see no reason to think he has lied to me just to try to pull one over on other commenters here.

      1. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

        Damn. Thanks, Zeb.

      2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

        Except I’m still not paying and I’m still here.

        And why are we just now learning that you know sarc in person?!!!!!!???

        Did you go to the half million dollar lake house with him?

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

          Given sarcs history, nobody can believe what he tells you anyways. He is a chronic liar. You can literally post his words without edit and he will claim he never said something.

          He is more likely to claim he isnt posting anymore than to actually stopping. He is an addict in everything.

          His excuse makes it even more likely to be a lie as he has literally been here for years after the announcement. So his reasoning is even empty. Like his 40.

        2. Zeb   1 month ago

          I'm not paying either, but it seems some are. I have no idea how it works.

          Did you go to the half million dollar lake house with him?
          As a matter of fact I did. It was a good time. I'm not going to defend the way he comported himself on here, but he's not a terrible person. And he is good at cooking, knowledge of Cuban sandwiches notwithstanding.

          1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

            You’re blowing my fucking mind right now. I’m wondering if you’ve been hacked.

            1. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

              Zeb is Sarc sock! I've suspected it for years!

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

            Burn.

            Like his steaks if he doesnt like how you order them.

          3. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 month ago

            Same. My guess is if I log out and try to log in again they will want payment.

            1. Zeb   1 month ago

              If I ever stop commenting here, that will probably be why. I almost wish they'd follow through with requiring the subscription. I waste way too much time here. But I would miss interacting with most of the regulars here.

              1. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

                I think most of us spend enough time here as to make $25 irrelevant considering a burger is like 20 bucks now.

                Wasted time on the other hand... Well, at least most of us are wasting our employers' time I assume.

            2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

              Ive logged in multiple times today. Brave logs me out whenever I close the app.

        3. Social Justice is neither   1 month ago

          Your last sentence is probably why he kept it a secret. Would you admit to knowing a retarded lolcow in person?

          1. Zeb   1 month ago

            I'm pretty sure I've mentioned knowing him in passing before. But in general, I try to keep away from personal stuff on here.
            Anyway, I'm pretty confident he's not still here running socks. I could be wrong. You can make up your own mind. I'd recommend just being happy he's gone and not picking stupid fights on here anymore. But you all can do what you want.

  8. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

    It distorted the private market, driving day cares out of business.

    I hear the Somalia community is ready to step up and help NY.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

      Of COURSE not.

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/seattle-s-new-mayor-has-no-plans-to-look-into-possible-local-daycare-fraud/ar-AA1TQz6o

      When asked by KOMO News on Wednesday whether she intended to have the Office of Immigration and Refugee Affairs or the Seattle Police Department follow up on looking into possible daycare fraud in Seattle, she said, “No.”

      1. Idaho-Bob   1 month ago

        And they wonder why the Feds get involved.

      2. damikesc   1 month ago

        Time to cut off all funds to WA state, at all, until they demonstrate that fraud is not occurring.

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

          Time to cut all federal welfare funds...it's all fraud.

          1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

            Time to cut all federal welfare funds…the constitution doesn’t give the federal government authority to steal my money and give it to others.

            1. damikesc   1 month ago

              Fair enough on both.

              Also no monies, AT ALL, to any NGOs.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          I live in WA State, and fully support cutting off federal funds to Olympia. I also support Trump putting Olympia amd Seattle under martial law.

  9. Ajsloss   1 month ago

    Only Time Will Tell

    As a wise woman once said, "Talking about the significance of the passage of time, right? The significance of the passage of time... So, when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires, what we need to do to create these jobs. And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children."

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

      Agatha Christie?

    2. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 month ago

      And a wise man once said. Practice? We not talkin' about a game we talkin' about Practice.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 month ago

        The Answer!

  10. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

    Hochul and Mamdani want in on the rampant welfare program fraud.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/01/kathy-hochul-zohran-mamdani-announce-billions-in-new-spending-on-free-childcare-program/

    1. Dillinger   1 month ago

      she's disgusting.

      1. damikesc   1 month ago

        I loved the optimism that she might serve as a brake on Mamdani. Cannot believe some idiots ACTUALLY believed that was a possible outcome.

        1. Dillinger   1 month ago

          sometimes it's readily apparent who has sold their soul.

          1. damikesc   1 month ago

            That implies Hochul HAD a soul in the first place.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

              I think he’s referring to people that pretended she’d be a brake.

  11. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

    Ripples.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/atlanta-fed-nearly-doubles-q4-growth-estimate-54-after-strong-data

    Ripples.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/economy/us-trade-deficit-reduces-294-billion

    Ripples.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/economics/us-online-holiday-shopping-hits-record-2578-billion-adobe

    1. HorseConch   1 month ago

      5.4 is a BIG number.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        Huge ripple from tariffs. Eric Will tell you why it is bad.

        Shrike and others will claim falsified number.

      2. Zeb   1 month ago

        It is big and I hope it continues. Though I have to wonder how much is AI bubble.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

          That bubble started years ago. We still saw sub 3 growth.

          The areas growing are not solely AI related.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          Yuge!

  12. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    Hochul committed to giving Mamdani everything he wants...

    A Democrat spending beyond her means? Now I've heard everything.

  13. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

    It seems like "cancel school" as the lowest hanging fruit for controlling civil unrest will come with plenty of bad side effects—

    Worked wonders during the Covid years

    1. Longtobefree   1 month ago

      Canceling school is the best way to get the looters and rioters on the streets.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

        Yep, the teachers now don’t have to use their PTO for that.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

          This. Now the taxpayers of Minnesota get to pay more directly for the protesters.

        2. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

          Yup, and maybe the feds can pay the bartenders and baristas more money not to work.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

            They already pay at least one, and she’s in Congress.

    2. Vernon Depner   1 month ago

      It's also part of the propaganda effort—fostering the delusion that kids in school are in danger from ICE.

  14. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

    Texas issues warning about unsolicited seed packages from china.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/food/texas-issues-warning-about-unsolicited-seed-packages-china

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 month ago

      Again!?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        They keep arresting the agroterror graduate students from china. So back to the old way.

  15. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    Federal law enforcement shot two people on Thursday afternoon in East Portland...

    Just to remind everyone who's boss.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

      Tony Danza?

      1. Zeb   1 month ago

        Or is it Judith Light?

        1. Dillinger   1 month ago

          it was Mona all along.

          1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

            Woah!

    2. HorseConch   1 month ago

      Those two Oregon men were turning their lives around and trying to leave behind their past as Tren de Agua members. By the past, I mean 1 second before they got shot.

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

        “They were just turning the car around”!

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 month ago

          They were legal observers.

  16. tracerv   1 month ago

    "Either we take educating our young seriously, or we don't."

    They don't. Just read anything from the teacher's union.

    1. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

      100% correct.

    2. JFree   1 month ago

      You can look around at other adults too for evidence we don't take educating the young seriously

  17. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

    Healthcare doesn't end just because youre dead.

    https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/hhs-report-finds-medicaid-paid-over-200-million-incorrect-payments

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

      It won’t make a dent in the deficit, so why bother?

  18. Ajsloss   1 month ago

    It looks like the Mamdani will get closer to enacting his vision of universal free (or, as I like to call it, taxpayer-funded, so not free at all) childcare for children as young as 6 weeks

    Couple that with Marxist demands for a full year of maternity leave and you've got quite the honeymoon. Sucks that new mothers would be expected to watch after children for the first six weeks though.

    1. Zeb   1 month ago

      Get those children into the hands of the state ASAP!

    2. BYODB   1 month ago

      I can't imagine leaving my kid with the state at six weeks old. I didn't even trust for-profit daycare when he was that young, or even still for that matter.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    Iran's supreme leader vowed on Friday that the government 'will not back down' in the face of protests that have rocked the country in recent weeks, accusing demonstrators of being vandals who were trying to 'please' President Trump...

    Time to convene a J6 committee!

    1. mad.casual   1 month ago

      Is it still irony if the surprise or revealed contradiction is only because half the audience is really, really stupid?

      1. damikesc   1 month ago

        I love that Starmer is discussing banning X in the UK, just as Iran is doing so. Seems extremely fitting.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

          I forget which one but one of the emirates is banning any of their citizens from going to college in UK because they don’t want them to get radicalized by Muslims.

          Yes, you read that right.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

            That’s very believable in the current day.

            1. HorseConch   1 month ago

              Notice how whatever is going on in Iran is completely devoid of media coverage. It's almost as though they don't want to report any bad news about one of Trump's sworn enemies.

  20. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    Minnesota AG who took $10K from convicted scammers dismisses fraud scandal as 'political theater'

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/minnesota-ag-who-took-10k-from-convicted-scammers-dismisses-fraud-scandal-as-political-theater/ar-AA1TMbkL

    1. Ajsloss   1 month ago

      Would you rather have the scammers keep the money?! He was doing all of us a favor!

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      He also told the fraudsters he would he would help keep it quiet.

  21. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    Spend it all before they convict me, seems to be the plan.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/head-of-taxpayer-funded-somali-charity-cutting-checks-to-family-members/ar-AA1TO6vO

    Somali Bantu Community Association of Maine Executive Director Muhidin Libah paid out over $100,000 from the charity he runs to members of his family between 2023 and 2024, tax filings show.

    In 2023, Muhdin Libah paid his wife, Fadumo Libah, $21,551 for “various business transactions” and another family member, Hawa Dakane, $38,559 for work as a “Women’s Community Advocate,” according to tax documents. The Somali Bantu Community Association accepted $180,245 in government funding that year. 2024 brought more of the same, with Fadumo Libah and Dakane bringing in roughly $42,000 from the charity while it received $444,220 in public funds.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Who would have thought USAID was the least corrupt in all this.

      1. HorseConch   1 month ago

        Wait until we see what the citizens have been stealing. There's zero chance that CA isn't 10-100x what MN is, but the only group to blame it on out there is democrats.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

          Example.

          https://www.complex.com/life/a/alexwgalbraith/california-inmates-involved-1-billion-dollar-covid-19-unemployment-benefits-fraud

          1. HorseConch   1 month ago

            The homeless money, the train to nowhere or more accurately the nothing at all, the 911 money they just pocketed, Gavin's Fire Aid money, and countless other piles.

  22. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

    "We have to start considering that maybe what's wrong in Cuba is our fault as a party."

    News at 12/26/1991.

  23. Ajsloss   1 month ago

    It distorted the private market, driving day cares out of business.

    Needs more Somalis.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

      That’s been the state’s strategy in WA for nearly 30 years.

  24. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    California judge bilked state out of thousands with sham company, banned doctor: Feds

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/california-judge-bilked-state-out-of-thousands-with-sham-company-banned-doctor-feds/ar-AA1TMeiu

    A California judge used a sham company to scam the state out of thousands of dollars using fraudulent workers comp payments and a doctor banned from the program, prosecutors said Wednesday.

    A corrupt judge and former prosecutor who put away murders and carjackers, is now facing his own time behind bars after he agreed to plead guilty in an alleged scheme to steal hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Golden State, according to the DOJ.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      More attacks on the judiciary who do nothing wrong ever.

      1. HorseConch   1 month ago

        That's nearly to the level of the judge who's house burned down in SC after Stephen Miller said her name one time.

  25. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    When late liberal pedagogy replaced Western civilization courses with global history, serious harm was done to the socialization of young Americans.

    THAT WAS THE POINT OF THE EXERCISE.

    1. Bubba Jones   1 month ago

      How many of the unsocialized whack jobs in this country went to Harvard?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        They all claim they did.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          Like our own Charlie Hall!

  26. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    Wealth tax threat prompts at least six billionaires to cut ties with California, as about 20 more mull exit: report

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/wealth-tax-threat-prompts-at-least-six-billionaires-to-cut-ties-with-california-as-about-20-more-mull-exit-report/ar-AA1TPCXI

    The threat of a steep new wealth tax in California has reportedly prompted at least six billionaires including Larry Page and Peter Thiel to cut their ties with the state — and as many as 20 others could be heading for the exits.

    The half-dozen billionaires made their moves before New Year’s Day — the cutoff date to avoid a potential one-time tax of 5% on fortunes exceeding $1 billion — which California residents will vote on in November, according to Bloomberg News.

    David Lesperance, a tax adviser who specializes in relocating ultra-wealthy clients out of high-tax jurisdictions, told the outlet he personally helped four billionaires end their California residency before the proposal’s Jan. 1 cutoff date.

    Divesh Makan, co-founder of Silicon Valley investment firm ICONIQ Capital and a wealth manager for some of the tech industry’s richest figures, said he knows of as many as five families that have already left the state.

    Makan told Bloomberg he expects another 15 to 20 billionaire families to depart if the tax is approved by voters — a significant portion of California’s roughly 200 billionaires.

    1. Super Scary   1 month ago

      "the cutoff date to avoid a potential one-time tax of 5% on fortunes exceeding $1 billion"

      "One time"? Now comes the part where we throw our heads back and laugh.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

        Note that the tax is slated to be retroactive to before the proposition vote is ever held, let alone having a law enacted.

      2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

        One time a year.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

        We just need a one time culling of Marxists within the US. Just knew time

  27. mad.casual   1 month ago

    The images coming out of the protests are kind of amazing

    The right one is just awesome.

    You've got a leader and you want them gone?

    Fuck AWFL Western feminism.

  28. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    When you don't teach the young what civilization is, it turns out, people become uncivilized.

    Also, when you teach a generation to hate their own culture, they have no reason to continue it much less fight for it. Obviously a weak or nonexistent western culture does not benefit humanity, but apparently it somehow benefits the elites.

    1. Bubba Jones   1 month ago

      At the same time, I'd love to see a list of US representatives who have actually read Plato.

  29. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

    Federal law enforcement shot two people on Thursday afternoon in East Portland, according to the Portland Police Bureau. The two were hospitalized, but no information about their condition was immediately available, reports KGW8.

    Targeted arrest of a TdA gang member with warrant who again tried to use his car as a weapon to get away.

  30. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    The Minneapolis public school system canceled classes for the rest of the week in the aftermath of a deadly shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer...

    Does the left no longer think public school is essential? Is this now a right-only position?

  31. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

    . It's unclear to me why school must be canceled in the aftermath of this event.

    Because the teachers and union want to protest and dont give an actual fuck about the kids. They even canceled remote learning used during snow days.

  32. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    Either we take educating our young seriously, or we don't.

    COVID should have been the nail in anti-school choice's coffin. Missed opportunity.

  33. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    So some Republicans in the House have decided to extend the now-expired COVID-era ACA subsidies. WTF did we have a whole government shutdown for, again?

    They can't even let spending that is supposed to expire BY LAW--a law Democrats passed without a single Republican vote--go away. They will NEVER cut actual spending.

    Fuck you all, cut spending!

    1. Social Justice is neither   1 month ago

      My dyslexia read that as "cut you all, fuck spending!" And that seemed much more appropriate.

  34. Fist of Etiquette   1 month ago

    Self-reflection in Cuba: "We have to start considering that maybe what's wrong in Cuba is our fault as a party."

    No, it's the prosperous who are wrong.

  35. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    Cea Weaver is clearly an idiot child, just plain AWFL.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

      AWFLs lining up to defend her, too...

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/liberals-rush-to-nyc-mayoral-aide-s-defense/ss-AA1TPZA2

      Liberal journalists who backed cancel culture when America was at its most woke now say an anti-white aide to New York City's mayor should be left alone after her vile tweets were exposed. David Klion and Natalie Shure both expressed outrage over the treatment of Cea Weaver, who runs the Big Apple's new office for tenant protections in New York City. Klion wrote: 'I know Cea slightly and have always found her impressive and serious. 'I see that one of her regrettable tweets was a 2018 QT (quote tweet) of one of mine, probably also regrettable but long-deleted. As millennials achieve political power, we're going to need a general amnesty on bad old tweets.'

      Meanwhile, Shure responded to a story about Weaver crying outside her home when challenged about her views on Wednesday, writing: 'perhaps she did that because its upsetting when bad faith tabloid reporters camp outside your apartment to hound you over 7-year-old-tweets and what your parents house looks like.' Weaver was branded a hypocrite after a slew of anti-white tweets were exposed. She vowed to 'impoverish the white middle class', said white people owning homes was racism, branded gentrification as 'white supremacy' and called for the election of more communist lawmakers. But Weaver made no mention of her mother owning a $1.4 million Craftsman home in Nashville - the fastest-gentrifying city in the United States. She also declined to disclose that her father is a private landlord who rents out a townhouse.

      Klion and Shure suggested Weaver's behavior was no big deal and that journalists had no right to challenge her. The pair previously took a markedly different tone when conservative lawmakers were in the hot seat. 'Yeah I would say discovering major red flags about politicians before they gain power is a useful role the media plays in democracy and has played forever, and its laughable to pretend that this is cancel culture gone too far,' Klion previously tweeted over an unidentified past political transgression. And in 2020 he wished cancellation on the Trump administration, tweeting: 'Cancel culture isn't real but I wish it was, as I think about the likely next moves of everyone who worked in this administration.'

      Shure claimed journalists were bullying Weaver nearly eight years after she suggested that members of the Trump administration should be hounded while in public. 'Making public space unpalatable for anyone in this administration is good and moral and cannot happen enough,' Shure declared. The obvious hypocrisy of Klion and Shure's tweets soon went viral, with neither addressing the strange change in their views. Former NYC councilman Sal Albanese echoed their claims, saying that the 'piling on Cea Weaver is disgraceful.' 'Disagree with her philosophy, don't like her posts from a long time ago, that's fair. However, the pummeling is cruel,' he added.

  36. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

    accusing demonstrators of being vandals who were trying to 'please' President Trump

    16 year old Persian girls are "rioting"?

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 month ago

      TDS-addled steaming piles of shit are trying to be "clever". And failing.
      Fuck off and die, asswipe.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 month ago

        Another feelz emote from a typical lefty, always wishing death.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 month ago

          Once more TDS-addled steaming piles of shit are trying to be "clever". And failing.
          Fuck off and die, asswipe.

  37. Marshal   1 month ago

    New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has decided her posture toward Mayor Zohran Mamdani is simply to give him everything he wants—

    She finally understands the scale of the fundraising opportunities taxpayer funded programs generate.

  38. mtrueman   1 month ago

    " When you don't teach the young what civilization is, it turns out, people become uncivilized."

    Someone should tell the good prof we need to do more than teach civilization, It needs to be put into practice.

    '

  39. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

    Gangster government keeps going.

    https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/01/08/congress/trump-vetoes-sustained-00717160

    Even though the vetoes for purely for political reasons, Congress upholds the vetoes.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

      Anyone ever tell you that you’re delusional, Jeff?

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

        What are your thoughts on the above article? Should Trump have issued those vetoes? Should Congress have sustained those vetoes?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

          Do you consider Politico to be a trustworthy news source?

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

            More trustworthy than not, sure. Why do you ask?

            1. damikesc   1 month ago

              Is the sky blue in your version of reality?

            2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

              Did you have some sort of point for linking that article from the far left DNC propaganda media site Politico?

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

          What are your thoughts on internal politico documents they accidentally linked?

          https://x.com/seanspicer/status/2009619040310862285

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

            They don't use low-quality news sources. Can't say I'm surprised.

            Naturally you all are complaining that they don't cite Breitbart or Daily Signal. They ALSO don't cite left-wing sites like Daily Kos, Jacobin or Media Matters.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

              They’re still DNC propaganda media.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        Its not delusional. Its a willingness to lie for his cause.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

          Its a willingness to lie for his cause.

          pure projection, coming from JesseBot

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

            No, Jesse just isn’t playing you game. You’re trying to spring some sophist trap. Everyone here knows it.

            We’re not playing.

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

              He hasn't figured that out yet.

              May just start posting his old bullshit comments in response again. Makes him really angry.

    2. damikesc   1 month ago

      Jeff coming in to support more government spending.

      I am beyond stunned.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

        No, I am opposed to using petty grievances to decide upon important matters of state.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

          Here’s Lying Jeffy calling spending “matters of state” so he can lie about supporting spending.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          Of what ‘matters of state’ do you speak?

        3. damikesc   1 month ago

          Jeff CONTINUES supporting more government spending. He tries to dress it up, but the reality is the reality.

    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

      Vetoing a bill is gangster?

  40. Eeyore   1 month ago

    Where are the free NYC buses? I was promised free buses?

    1. Longtobefree   1 month ago

      Just for the record, democrats (and other communists) lie.

    2. Zeb   1 month ago

      TANSTAAFB

      1. Eeyore   1 month ago

        Must be true. I've waited years for my free pony with plans to convert that pony into about 100 free lunches.

  41. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

    “The universal nature of it might be politically valuable when you're currying favor with the tony Park Slope crowd”

    Shots fired! If you’re trying to get back to “Good Liz”, this is the way.

  42. Moonrocks   1 month ago

    Hochul committed to giving Mamdani everything he wants

    Accelerate.

  43. Moonrocks   1 month ago

    plenty of bad side effects—namely, children not getting much of an education.

    To be fair, they wouldn't be getting much of an education if they didn't cancel schools.

  44. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

    Looks like Iran might be heating up. The protesters seem to have a goal of restoring the monarchy and are openly defying the Islamic regime.

    https://x.com/marionawfal/status/2009623136829124708?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    IRANIAN PROTESTERS KILLED 6 SECURITY FORCES IN HAMADAN. SEVERAL MORE DEAD IN TEHRAN. REGIME'S OWN NEWS AGENCY REPORTING IT

    If true, this just got promoted to armed conflict.

    Iran's state-owned Tasnim News Agency reports 6 security force members killed in Hamadan during last night's demonstrations. Several more killed and injured in Tehran.

    This is massive escalation. Previous reports focused on security forces shooting protesters. Now protesters are reportedly killing back.

    State media usually doesn't admit security force deaths unless they can't hide them. Which means actual numbers probably higher.

    Context: Total internet blackout still in effect. Cities described as "war zones." Competing claims of massacre-level protester casualties. Now regime acknowledging its own forces getting killed.

    When both sides are killing each other at this scale, it's already a civil conflict.

    U.S. intelligence just revised assessment saying protests stronger than initially thought. This is probably why.

    Regime usually frames all violence as "rioters attacking innocent security forces protecting public."

    When they admit 6 killed in one city, situation is beyond their control in that area.

    Total blackout prevents knowing full scope. But regime's own news agency confirming security force casualties tells you protests crossed into something else.

    Source: Tasnim News Agency

    I have cautious optimism for them now. The regime seems to be running scared as their usual suppression forces are either on the sidelines or laid down their weapons. They’re down to using the Revolutionary Guards on the people.

    1. mad.casual   1 month ago

      "They're probably just doing it to appease Trump." - Reason Magazine

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        Are you telling me sending pallets of cash to Iran, removing inspectors, and removing sanctions didnt make Iran work better? Does Obama know?

        1. mad.casual   1 month ago

          Turns out it's hard to keep your own people in the dark about your peaceful nuclear ambitions when they can see the flash from your underground nuclear special weapons facility being blown up.

          "Democracy dies in darkness, but darkness is never the direct cause." indeed.

          1. Dillinger   1 month ago

            running water helps too. and where the fuck is Valerie Jarrett?!?!?

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

        Reason has sunk to the level of peddling pro Iranian regime propaganda.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 month ago

      "...I have cautious optimism for them now..."
      Me, too.

    3. Marshal   1 month ago

      One dangerous outcome of this: it gives the hardcore Islamists a better claim to refugee status. Given how leftists write and interpret our laws they could find themselves kicked out of Iran but handed control of America (or Britain, France, or Germany instead) in exchange.

      We can't get the leftists out of power fast enough.

  45. Use the Schwartz   1 month ago

    "print money"

    Wait, so besides ALL the economic reasons why this is stupid, she thinks that a state mayor can get the Federal Government to print money for local housing?

    What kind of election do they think they have won? These people are retarded children.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Its NYC. Center of the world. Haven't you seen the scenes from there?

  46. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

    https://x.com/MattWalshBlog/status/2009442911776330110

    This is all on video. The Trump Administration can either hunt down and imprison every single person participating in these chants, or they can let the terrorists drag our country into mass chaos and violence yet again. There is no third option.

    By the way, the chants referred to protestors in NYC chanting "kill ICE".

    It's tacky and crude, but it's also protected speech.

    What do you think? Do you agree with Matt Walsh that the protestors should all be arrested for their chants?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

      What is not considered protected speech?
      The Court generally identifies these categories as obscenity, defamation, fraud, incitement, fighting words, true threats, speech integral to criminal conduct, and child pornography. The contours of these categories have changed over time, with many having been significantly narrowed by the Court.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

        Do you agree with Matt Walsh that those protestors should be rounded up and arrested?

        1. damikesc   1 month ago

          I would not lose a moment of sleep.

          I will spend zero effort to protect the rights of people who will do nothing to protect my rights.

        2. Chupacabra   1 month ago

          No, but they should be shot in the head if they trespass public property. Did I get that right?

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

            Fatfuck proudly supports that.

        3. Marshal   1 month ago

          Support for terrorism should be grounds to revoke all visas. Anyone here on a visa of any type should be deported.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

            By "support", do you mean *material* support, like donating time or money to a terrorist organization? Or do you mean "support" in a broader sense, like simply stating sympathy for a certain cause?

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 month ago

              Look at Lying Jeffy go!

            2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

              Pedo Jeffy, we’re done here.

              Move on.

            3. damikesc   1 month ago

              Any of it.

              You're a guest here. Nobody gives a flying shit what you think about any damned thing.

              Want to opine? Stay home, loser.

            4. Marshal   1 month ago

              Advocating terrorism is enough.

        4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          I agree they should be treated exactly the same way as the J6 detainees.

  47. Marshal   1 month ago

    accusing demonstrators of being vandals who were trying to 'please' President Trump," reports The New York Times. "

    I'm sure it's just a coincidence the mullahs use the same playbook as the extreme American campus left. "Don't pay any attention to what we're doing, he's Hitler!".

    1. mad.casual   1 month ago

      Violent, totalitarian, religious fundamentalism is the greatest existential threat ever faced by rational, global, secular, liberal societies around the world and should be opposed and stamped out wherever it is found... unless they're Muslim and it pleases Trump. Then we should support its expansion around the globe in the name of diversity.

      T.D.S.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Yesterday I mentioned Maduro as another criminal using the rhetoric of the left. Here is another. You can literally post this daily.

      1. Chupacabra   1 month ago

        That makes sense considering that several leftist groups have been travelling to Venezuela to train with the cartel.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          Can we finally just get rid of the left? How much worse does it have to get?

  48. Marshal   1 month ago

    It's unclear to me why school must be canceled in the aftermath of this event. Is it that school administrators, law enforcement, etc. don't believe themselves capable of handling protests?

    Sometimes I think you haven't been paying attention. The antifa members Dems count on to be their most extreme riot leaders work in the school systems. Dems are freeing up their shock troops from regular duty so they can focus their energy on the upcoming riots.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

      This. Teachers seem to be the front line of antifa.

  49. MollyGodiva   1 month ago

    Any MAGA want to try to defend Trump acquiring the Nobel Prize from Machado? No other US president or leader of a free country would do that.

    1. Ajsloss   1 month ago

      Cool story, bro.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Was it by force china Tony?

      Usually when an action happens, the person initiating the action is the one discussed. In this case Machado.

      Youre broken and retarded china Tony.

    3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

      Walz +7

    4. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

      And where is he “acquiring” this from her? Got a cite and a link, commietard?

    5. MollyGodiva   1 month ago

      To put this in perspective: This is worse than Obama getting the prize which he in no way earned.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        What a retarded perspective.

    6. damikesc   1 month ago

      Cite?

  50. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 month ago

    "...Trump claims his hurt feelings have nothing to do with his antagonism toward Machado..."

    But you, as a two-bit amateur 'analyst', know better, right? Stuff your TDS up your ass.

  51. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    Keep digging.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/san-francisco-votes-yes-on-reparations-fund-for-black-residents-while-1b-in-the-red/ss-AA1TQIvi

    San Francisco votes yes on reparations fund for Black residents while $1B in the red

    San Francisco just created a reparations fund that could one day pay Black residents $5 million each. The catch is the fund has no money, no funding source, and the city is staring down a $1 billion deficit.

    The Board of Supervisors voted 11-0 to establish the framework, and Mayor Daniel Lurie signed it two days before Christmas without any public announcement.

    That report proposed $5 million lump-sum payments to each eligible Black adult, guaranteed annual incomes of $97,000, debt forgiveness, and homes sold for just $1.

    The full plan would cost roughly $50 billion. San Francisco operates on a $14 billion budget. The committee was not asked to figure out how to pay for it.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 month ago

      LOL

    2. mad.casual   1 month ago

      "They got to vote on it?" - Minnesota

      Social democracy FTW!

    3. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 month ago

      From the federal government, which will just print the money. Just ask Cea Weaver.

  52. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    Minnesota seems to be in the center for a lot of this shit, don't they?

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/watchdog-exposes-taxpayer-funded-teacher-program-for-banning-white-applicants-likely-illegal/ar-AA1TSSqH

    A leading education watchdog group released a report this week alleging that a state-funded teacher preparation partnership in Minnesota explicitly limits eligibility based on race, possibly in violation of federal law.

    According to a report released by Defending Education, the Minnesota Educators Partnership (MEP), a collaboration between MSU Mankato and several southern Minnesota school districts, operates multiple teacher pipeline programs that are restricted to Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) applicants despite being funded with taxpayer dollars through the Minnesota Department of Education.

    1. Michael Ejercito   1 month ago

      This also violates equal protection.

      "We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place." Brown v Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 495 (1954).

      Have not these people heard of Brown?

      1. Dillinger   1 month ago

        "what's a precedent?" ~~ all marxists

      2. Mickey Rat   1 month ago

        Don't you understand? Race based policies negatively affecting whites are good. It is not a contradiction in their minds...

        ...because they are insane.

        1. Michael Ejercito   1 month ago

          I wonder why they hate White people so much.

  53. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

    Okay, which one of you is this?

    https://www.threads.com/@amay.a100/post/DTQaqJ9Da6s

    "We executed one of you guys today!"

    1. Use the Schwartz   1 month ago

      I mean this with no hostility or malice; I think you will fit in better over at The Bulwark.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

        Why do you say that?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

          You’re definitely no libertarian, Jeff.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

            I disagree.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

              You’re an open borders globalist Sorosite. There is nothing libertarian about that

            2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

              And you're welcome to do so. It doesn't change the fact that you're not a libertarian, Jeff.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

        That would sadly be a step up for him.

        His first in the morning haunts are Kos, reddit, and jacobin based on his post history.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          Don’t forget ‘The Daily Worker’.

  54. Dillinger   1 month ago

    anyone who was forced to endure Josh Hawley as a Con Law professor should be refunded the money.

  55. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

    Birds aren't real.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/offbeat/viral-bird-theory-says-all-white-people-have-one-thing-in-common/ar-AA1TOwun

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 month ago

      Bird decor is literally a CIA/deep state plot to convince white people birds are real.

    2. Dillinger   1 month ago

      skin color groups aren't real either.

    3. Super Scary   1 month ago

      There may be something to this. My mom has a crazy amount of chicken/rooster stuff in her kitchen.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 month ago

        My wife mentioned it to me this morning (she saw something on reddit). I immediately was able to point to like 5 different birds in the bedroom alone. Many many chickens (but she keeps our chicken flock, so it makes a *little* sense).

        I think it's more of a white woman thing, as I don't think when I was a bachelor I ever had any bird decor...hell didn't really have any decor at all.

  56. Dillinger   1 month ago

    >>Trump claims his hurt feelings have nothing to do with his antagonism toward Machado.

    that link doesn't contain "hurt feelings" where are you getting T's feelings are hurt?

    1. Ajsloss   1 month ago

      The lady doth project too much, methinks.

  57. Dillinger   1 month ago

    >>It's unclear to me why school must be canceled in the aftermath of this event.

    best thing for those children is to not be in Minneapolis Public Schools even if for only a few days

  58. Dillinger   1 month ago

    >>Iran's supreme leader vowed on Friday that the government 'will not back down'

    Tom Petty fan

    1. Chupacabra   1 month ago

      Hopefully he's "Learning to Fly"... out of a helicopter at 3,000 feet.

      1. Dillinger   1 month ago

        will have to live like a Refugee

      2. Quicktown Brix   1 month ago

        uggh... Free fallin' was right there.

        Don't do me like that.

  59. Dillinger   1 month ago

    >>Federal law enforcement shot two people on Thursday afternoon in East Portland

    everyone knew who and why by 9:00 eastern last night

  60. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

    Trump says that when it comes to international affairs, the only limits on his power that he recognizes is "my own morality". Well, that's a relief! We know how much of a moral, upstanding man Trump is!

    https://thehill.com/policy/international/5680714-trump-morality-international-law/

    President Trump said his “own morality” guides his decisions on foreign intervention in a interview published Thursday, following weeks of scrutiny for U.S. strikes overseas.

    “Yeah, there is one thing. My own morality. My own mind. It’s the only thing that can stop me,” Trump told the The New York Times Wednesday night when asked if there were any limits on his international power.

    1. Mickey Rat   1 month ago

      .

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

      Yes, from the ever-reliably anti-Trump The Hill. You sure do know how to pick your sources, Jeff.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

        Is the story false? Did Trump not say those things?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   1 month ago

          And how many times do they take him out of context to say what they want him to say, Mr. Fine People?

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   1 month ago

          Does Trump not follow the law?

          Seriously, we’re not playing your game, Fatfuck. So just move on.

  61. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

    Bill introduced to strip ICE agents of qualified immunity.

    https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5681208-swalwell-goldman-ice-legislation/

    Not a bad idea actually. Worth at least discussing.

    1. Mickey Rat   1 month ago

      So just ICE officers?

      In other words it is completely reactionary and unprincipled bill targeted at an LEO organization the Democrats currently hate and not generally applicable.

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 month ago

        Imagine that.

        Dems hate ICe for going afgter one of their golden calves.

    2. Dillinger   1 month ago

      love it. Mr. Fang-Fang begs Karma out loud.

    3. damikesc   1 month ago

      ONLY ICE officers?

      Hmm.

      Doesn't sound like a bullshit idea at all. Really, it does not.

    4. Chupacabra   1 month ago

      Sure, as long as we include politicians, bureaucrats, teachers, etc., right?

    5. The Margrave of Azilia   1 month ago

      How about limiting qualified immunity to the proverbial split-second decisions where life and death are at stake?

      That, at least, might get some votes, and might cover *all* cops, not just ICE.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 month ago

        I could get on board with that.

      2. Rick James   1 month ago

        Because qualified Immunity is not a 'cop' doctrine, it's an "all public officials" doctrine, and there are too many interested parties that don't want to see it go away, and the majority of those interested parties align left. Not that leaning left is the singular reason that it won't go away, but that qualified immunity is a bipartisan issue, not some red meat tough-on-crime MAGA barrier to stopping it.

        One major political force that wants to make sure qualified immunity remains in pace are Teacher's Unions. Yep, that's right, the Teacher's Union has every interest in making sure cantankerous parents don't personally sue their members.

        State Social workers. Yep, that's right, CPS social workers don't want to see lawsuits from cantankerous parents who had their children taken from them.

      3. Rick James   1 month ago

        By the way, if'n you're curious about going down this rabbit hole, here is a VERY satisfying (legal nerd) video of a court proceeding where the state attempted to assert not only qualified immunity but ABSOLUTE immunity for a wayward CPS worker and were denied.

        1. Rick James   1 month ago

          My favorite part is where the state's lawyer tries to assert the same po-tay-to/po-tah-to liberty interest between a foster parent and biological parent and the judge claps her ass and says, "uhh, that is a gigantic difference!"

      4. Mickey Rat   1 month ago

        "ICE Agents Disguise Themselves As Capitol Police So Democrats Will Defend Them"

        https://babylonbee.com/news/ice-agents-disguise-themselves-as-capitol-police-so-democrats-will-defend-them?fbclid=IwY2xjawPOspNleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFKTTRNVTQwT25WYWo4Z2Rvc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrSYbEaLJ8fs0V8YoY_rDUL-jfdUEB9xHVm9iqeLd46N32MWMgOY1ohrKwF3_aem_19EAlLt0G6qpN9Xg6b1DEw

  62. Mickey Rat   1 month ago

    "Is it that school administrators, law enforcement, etc. don't believe themselves capable of handling protests?"

    Because the teacher's union's leadership is having a sad, and any excuse to get time off.

  63. damikesc   1 month ago

    https://x.com/Breaking911/status/2009472976463495257?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2009611862657438136%7Ctwgr%5E64e10957948fef46ac11115c80d90681e40517c6%7Ctwcon%5Es3_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Finstapundit.com%2F768215%2F

    White chick upset over having to memorialize the dead chick who tried to ram the ICE agent because she was white.

    Progressives --- this is you. You own all of this crap.

    Hope you enjoy dying for a cause that your fellow followers STILL hate you for. Serves you right.

    1. Chupacabra   1 month ago

      Even white chicks hate white chicks.

    2. Dillinger   1 month ago

      "wait ... I'm not even martyred??"

      1. Ajsloss   1 month ago

        That made me think of Family Guy:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNxKdb8DWm0&rco=1

        1. Dillinger   4 weeks ago

          lol yes

    3. Vernon Depner   4 weeks ago

      Imagine how differently this would have been covered if anyone involved had been non-white.

  64. Rick James   1 month ago

    Hochul committed to giving Mamdani everything he wants: Like a step-parent trying to curry favor with the kids, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has decided her posture toward Mayor Zohran Mamdani is simply to give him everything he wants—budget be damned. That's one way to do it, I suppose.

    It looks like the Mamdani will get closer to enacting his vision of universal free (or, as I like to call it, taxpayer-funded, so not free at all) child care for children as young as 6 weeks by first expanding the universal pre-K program from covering 3- and 4-year-olds to covering all 2-year-olds.

    Dude, do NOT tell me you didn't see this coming. Don't even try to tell me you're looking around and asking, "What in tarnation is going on here?"

    1. Marshal   1 month ago

      do NOT tell me you didn't see this coming.

      The core Dem value proposition is paying for everything via government. Publicly they pretend this is so everyone can access service and consumption is therefore equal. But in reality they do this because it allows them to trade jobs for votes and fraud for campaign donations.

      Ultimately Hochul wants the same thing as Mamdani, she's just afraid being so open about it will cause them to lose elections. No one should be surprised when left wingers who pretend to be liberal cave to the extremists. That's always going to happen.

      1. damikesc   1 month ago

        I gotta admit: I enjoy how Mamdani turned Hochul into his bitch.

    2. mad.casual   4 weeks ago

      6 weeks

      I will say "The fuck?" to this. FMLA is 12 weeks. They're (we're) paying one person not to work because they had a kid and *then* they're (we're) paying another person to take care of the kid full time for 50% of that? And ENB says Trump is the crazy, spend-thrift natalist?

      Even from fairly feminist standpoint this is a move from "It takes a village." to "The village *will* raise your child (birthing unit 653874)."

  65. Rick James   1 month ago
  66. LIBtranslator   1 month ago

    Time told. Lizard got the Christian National Socialism she thinks the LP ought to embrace, masked Gestapo killers and all--for Jesus.

  67. MWAocdoc   4 weeks ago

    "plenty of bad side effects—namely, children not getting much of an education"

    It's okay. They weren't getting much of an education when the schools were open.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Half-Hearted Halftime Outrage

Christian Britschgi | 2.9.2026 9:42 AM

Alienated by Trump, Europeans Finally Take Responsibility for Defense

J.D. Tuccille | 2.9.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Heckler's Veto

Charles Oliver | 2.9.2026 4:00 AM

Lawmakers in Texas and Ohio Consider Abolishing Property Taxes

Christian Britschgi | From the February/March 2026 issue

The Supreme Court Is Poised To Remind States That the Constitution Doesn't Stop at the Liquor Store

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 2.7.2026 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks