Trump Says Tariffs Have Brought in $18 Trillion. That's Impossible.
The tariffs have generated less than $300 billion in new tax revenue, and other claimed investments don't come close to the president's tally.
In recent weeks, President Donald Trump has inflated his previous claims about how lucrative tariffs have been for the United States.
Trump's new figure: An astonishing $18 trillion.
Trump first used the "$18 trillion" figure during a cabinet meeting on December 2, then repeated it during comments to reporters on December 3 and in an interview with Politico on December 8. He also brought it up, unprompted and somewhat bizarrely, during the announcement on December 4 of a new peace treaty that aims to end hostilities between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
On Sunday, Trump revisited the $18 trillion claim while speaking to reporters at the White House. "Because of the tariffs, we've taken in more than 18—think of this—more than $18 trillion. There's never been anything like it," Trump said. Moments later, he repeated the claim, stating that "we took in more than $18 trillion in 10 months."
That figure is utterly fantastical—and Trump's explanation is more than a little confusing. More on that in a moment.
First, it is necessary to swat aside the most outlandish interpretation of this claim—one that is being made by some of the president's supporters, including some prominent conservative media personalities. They seem to believe that Trump is saying the federal government has collected $18 trillion in tariff revenue this year.
That is both factually wrong and logically absurd.
Start with the facts: Over the first 11 months of this year, the federal government collected $236 billion in tariffs and duties. That number comes directly from the Treasury Department's monthly reports. And even though it represents a huge increase in tariff collections—Trump's tariffs are the biggest tax increase since 1993—it plainly does not amount to trillions in new revenue.
In fact, Trump's tariffs are expected to generate about $2.3 trillion over the course of the next decade (if the Supreme Court doesn't strike them down or Congress or some future administration doesn't undo them), according to the Yale Budget Lab. That's 10 years of higher tariffs and the total is still nowhere near $18 trillion.
Logically, getting $18 trillion in tariff revenue in a single year is impossible. The U.S. imported about $3.3 trillion of goods last year. You'd have to tax those imports at nearly 600 percent to get $18 trillion in new tariff revenue. Of course, if you taxed imports at that level, you'd end up with roughly the same amount of imports as tariff revenue: zero.
So, no, that is not happening.
Part of the confusion here is the carelessness with which the president uses phrases like "we took in." Is he talking about the government? If not, then what? Unfortunately, this tendency extends beyond talking points. The Trump administration has repeatedly and intentionally blurred the line between the government and the private sector, and that seems to be what is happening here too.
When Trump says "we took in," he seems to be referring not to tax revenue from the tariffs but a combination of tax revenue and various investment deals that have been promised by private businesses and foreign governments. Those investments are not being "took in" by the federal government in any way. They are fully private. One might also wonder if they will actually materialize, when the money will actually be spent, or whether such investments would have occurred even without Trump's tariff threats.
For the president, however, such distinctions and considerations are not a factor.
Still, after accounting all of that, Trump's $18 trillion figure seems to be wildly exaggerated, even when compared to the Trump administration's own numbers.
In April, the White House launched a website tracking the "Trump effect" that is meant to track the "new investment in U.S. manufacturing, technology, and infrastructure" since Trump returned to office.
As of Monday, the White House's official tally was $9.6 trillion.
How do you get from there to $18 trillion? Only the president seems to know. Or maybe, possibly, he's just making it all up.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Facts that contradict Trump are leftist, along with math, economics, civics and history.
Getting worked up with misleading while the actual amounts brought in are public and mentioned often by people like Bessent.... must be a shitlib.
Yet you often defended Biden when he misspoke. Weird.
This isn't misspeaking. Is someone feeding him these numbers? If so, they need to be fired. How many more decades do we have to suffer dolts in the presidency who can't or won't tell the truth to the people? ( Yeah, I know, "you can't handle the truth.")
Jesse is perfectly fine when Republicans misspeak. But Democrats? Absolutely not - never allowed. Why? Because all Republicans are infallible and all Democrats are completely fallible. Ya see?
Poor sarc
Well yeah. Jesse and the rest of the MAGA trolls in these comments judge right and wrong based upon who, not what. Two people do the exact same thing. One is a Democrat and the other is a Republican. The Democrat is evil and what they did is inexcusable while the Republican is virtuous and what they did is above reproach. Same thing. Same exact action. Only difference is political party. Principals, not principles.
How come you're avoiding the roundup? You've been trolling the other articles with your band of white knights (read 'socks'). Tired of getting stomped? Anybody who disagrees with you is MAGA! Its projection all the way down.
Because most people work for a living? Clearly most of the MAGA comrades here, with nothing better to do but stalk the Reason comments at all hours, do not - perhaps let go due to budget cuts from tariffs?
Fuck off with your sock puppeting Sarc. You worthless, child abusing drunken pussy.
Cool story bro.
18T is about the total economic trade. Is my guess.
But his comments also include investments, not just the tariffs, if you look to his entire statement which seems to not be noted here.
Again. The numbers are public. Speakers like Bessent are much more clear and he speaks often.
But sure. This was worthy of an article.
And said in defense of Reasons comms major economist who gets things wrong far more often.
This was worthy of an article.
To be fair, calling it an article is generous.
What Trump is saying is that trade negotiations are bringing in $18 trillion on foreign investment. He never said tariffs have literally brought $18 trillion in tariff revenue. I’ve heard him talk about this repeatedly at his many, many press conferences.
Boehm is a deranged, retarded liar who should be fired, along with KMW for platforming the mentally ill moron.
This article was written for Walz +11 retarded cunts like JeffSarc.
LOL The child president speaks again. Can someone please nominate a normal rational adult human being to run for president next time?
Kamala!
Chase Oliver? Kamala Harris? Joe Biden? AOC? Gavin Newsom? Gary Johnson? Vermin Supreme? The Rent is Too Damn High guy? Tim Walz? Bootygig? Who will meet that criteria?
Luggage thief guy.
Bill Nye the science guy.
Hahahahahahahaha
Fuck off faggot.
Trump is a liar and an moron.
If you wish to refer to somebody as a moron, learn how to use proper grammar while doing so.
It makes it double funny this way.
double plus good
I hope Tony doubles down on this.
Yes it does.
Have faith, everyone - with Trump as our leader, nothing's impossible.
You lost. Seethe harder.
It doesn't make economic sense to believe that "they" would spend/invest/whatever $18T to avoid even the ridiculous tariffs that have been implemented.
The announcements I recall have all been things that were already planned, or things that will never happen.
I 100% agree that $18T is a ridiculous number. Beyond that, Boehm contributes literally nothing of additional value.
I'd say it's like a ridiculous show trial but it's not even really a trial. It's exceedingly cat lady feels/TDS-vibing in an almost Monty Python-esque manner.
yes! if anything Eric's entire schtick is This bird is dead! ... No no it's not dead it's resting. Remarkable plumage ...
We’ll see. Trump will be a massive success if we even see a third of that.
It doesn't make economic sense to believe that "they" would spend/invest/whatever $18T to avoid even the ridiculous tariffs that have been implemented.
The Biden administration already demonstrated that Demonrats won't overturn tariffs. It isn't because they suddenly don't like them, it's because they know full well that working class voters are dead to them.
They will not repeal them, which is why Schumer orchestrated a vote to overturn the emergency that justified the tariffs. Chief Justice John Roberts will look at that and say "political problem, political solution".
How do you get from there to $18 trillion? Only the president seems to know. Or maybe, possibly, he's just making it all up.
Well, whether Trump is making up the number or not, I'm pretty sure ChatGPT would've given me a better guess than you did.
He’s referring to foreign investment commitments derived from his tariff negotiations.
Am I the only one that listens to his press conferences?
I think what he means to say is, "My administration took in Americans to the tune of $18 trillion."
I think what you meant to say was “I’m a retarded democrat who thinks Kamala and tampon Tim would have been just swell”.
"In recent weeks, President Donald Trump has inflated his previous claims about how lucrative tariffs have been for the United States.
Trump's new figure: An astonishing $18 trillion.
Trump first used the "$18 trillion" figure during a cabinet meeting on December 2, then repeated it during comments to reporters on December 3 and in an interview with Politico on December 8. He also brought it up, unprompted and somewhat bizarrely, during the announcement on December 4 of a new peace treaty that aims to end hostilities between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
On Sunday, Trump revisited the $18 trillion claim while speaking to reporters at the White House. "Because of the tariffs, we've taken in more than 18—think of this—more than $18 trillion. There's never been anything like it," Trump said. Moments later, he repeated the claim, stating that "we took in more than $18 trillion in 10 months."
That figure is utterly fantastical—and Trump's explanation is more than a little confusing. More on that in a moment."
Seriously, Reason?
The very first link I clicked on for your source shows that they weren't even talking about tariffs but foreign investment commitments into the USA over the coming years.
How did you link a source that literally doesn't support your own claim right in your own headline and thesis statement?
From your source, one of many statements countering your claims. Are you MSNBC now?
Here is the best example of your aggregious lying by ommission and intential quote mining.
Your article: "On Sunday, Trump revisited the $18 trillion claim while speaking to reporters at the White House. "Because of the tariffs, we've taken in more than 18—think of this—more than $18 trillion. There's never been anything like it," Trump said. Moments later, he repeated the claim, stating that "we took in more than $18 trillion in 10 months."
The ACTUALY statement in your very link:"And I hope that goes well. I think it's very important. But think of the number, we're going to be over $18 trillion in 10 months and -- which is a record times probably eight or 10 times, I think more than that, for any country. There's never been a country that's had that kind of an investment ever in history."
Why did you leave off "There's never been a country that's had that kind of an investment ever in history." That was literally the next sentence and part of the context that clearly tells you, as do a number of other statements in your source, what they are talking about.
@ericBohen you should be ashamed of yourself.
He’s referring to foreign investment commitments related to tariff negotiations. He’s said this multiple times at his recent press conferences.
first, it's unpossible. segunda, are you familiar with the Peter Griffin "shallow & pedantic" scene?
+1 I find the $9.6T your administration has drummed up in domestic investments to be shallow and pedantic.
Fatass Donnie is such a lying cockroach. After insulting Rob Reiner the day he was murdered it is no hyperbole to say he is the biggest piece of shit that ever sat foot in Washington.
Gold forbid anyone disrespect a Hollywood personality.
He insults veterans, Gold Star families, female reporters, his former cabinet members, and all sorts of innocent people.
Trump is white trash.
You’re peddling more discredited lies you fucking child rapist.
Walz +8
Trump 'said' something again! Everyone dog-pile! /s
No need to take it within context. Just make-up the context.
We really needs good plan for mass detention of hardcore Marxist democrats.
Can't imagine why he's had a few bankruptcies.
Trump Says Tariffs Have Brought in $18 Trillion. That's Impossible.
Meh. Whatever crazy shit Dear Leader says goes in this country.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2025/dec/09/donald-trump/foreign-corporate-investment-18-22-trillion/
I suppose he be could held accountable and tell us the truth. But then the secret service would have to kidnap him for reasons of national security and take him back home :haha:
directly from your link....
"The White House’s total includes large commitments from governments such as the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, whose pledges are multiple times larger than their countries’ annual gross domestic product, which calls the pledges’ feasibility into question."
LMAO. So the 'False' resides in Politi?Facts? that countries can't fulfill what they pledged.
It never ceases to amaze me how these BS fact-checkers defeat themselves.
Did you think that was actually funny?
Man, this is some hard hitting joUrNaLiSm
That figure is utterly fantastical—and Trump's explanation is more than a little confusing.
No it's not. You're just lying through your teeth. You're misrepresenting what he actually said, and you're distorting the reality of what he's talking about.
Here, Eric, you pathetic sack of flaccid, impotent genitals: https://www.democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/trump-transcripts/transcript-president-trump-holds-a-cabinet-meeting-at-the-white-house-12225
From the Democrats, no less.
Thanks for that link.
President Trump...
"In four long years of the Biden administration, there were just $1 trillion of ****new investments**** in the United States. In 10 months, we've secured commitments of over $18 trillion."
The wording is VERY clear. Yet TDS idiots LIE so they can call Trump a liar.