The Dell-Trump Alliance
Plus: Casino revenue, another Heritage scandal, and more...
Is the era of the billionaire philanthropist back? (In fact, had it ever really disappeared, or had our politics just failed to recognize the generosity?)
Dell Technologies founder Michael Dell and his wife, Susan, announced earlier this week that they want to help fund President Donald Trump's savings accounts for babies, to the tune of $6.25 billion, or $250 per 25 million children.
"This investment piggybacks off Invest America's original plan, which will provide all children born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028, a tax-deferred savings account with $1,000 provided by the government," reports Deseret News. "Now, with the Dells' contribution, the first 25 million American children to sign up for the accounts who are under 10 years old—who were born before Jan. 1, 2025, and live in ZIP codes with median incomes of $150,000 or less—will receive $250." In essence, they're financing Trump's plan, though in a somewhat means-tested way. (Do ZIP codes with higher median incomes get exempt from Trump's plan altogether?)
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
"Donating to the government is unusual, although philanthropists have funded the construction of schools, hospitals and other public institutions for centuries," reports Bloomberg. "More recently, billionaire heir Timothy Mellon offered $130 million to help pay troops during the recent government shutdown, according to the New York Times."
"TWO GREAT PEOPLE. I LOVE DELL!!!" wrote the president on Truth Social immediately after the announcement became public.
A few things could be happening here. One, the Dells could be trying to curry favor with Trump. Two, they could be attempting to set an example for how philanthropy ought to be done, throwing a bit of shade on the nonprofit world in the process (though is administering philanthropy through government really much better?). Three, they could be attempting to rehabilitate the image of capitalists, planting little seeds in recipients' minds that the path of the Dells is one worth emulating. Four, they could just legitimately believe in Trump's plan and want to help him administer it.
But I'm also persuaded by Odd Lots host Joe Weisenthal's skepticism:
I agree that Michael Dell can donate money however he wants. It's his money and none of our opinions on it matter at all.
With that out of the way. What's the best argument that a one time $250 check will meaningfully alter the trajectory of many people's lives?
— Joe Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) December 3, 2025
I've seen many people applaud the Dell move, because it's voluntary and simple. (Unlike forced taxation into the fiscal maw).
But another interpretation is that it shows how the juice from the squeeze, of simply redistributing billionaire money to the poor is fairly modest.
— Joe Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) December 3, 2025
Will these direct transfers, at this level, really do much? Of course, parents can contribute too, and that's surely part of the vision. Accounts are set to open on July 4, 2026. Family members can contribute, up to $5,000 tax-free per year (though the accounts will be pre-seeded with money from the government…and apparently the Dell family). When the recipient turns 18, they can withdraw from their account to help fund their education (or their housing, or their living expenses). Even aside from the results, it's not a terrible model for teaching fiscal responsibility. Then again, is that really the government's job?
Scenes from New York: "For transit watchers, the vote on Monday to recommend licensing three casinos in New York City was about something other than roulette wheels and dealers shuffling cards close to home. It was about guaranteeing new revenue for mass transit in New York," reports The New York Times. "The would-be operators of the three casinos have promised to pay more than $1.5 billion in one-time fees to the state if they become operational after receiving the licenses recommended by the New York Gaming Facility Location Board. The money would be another new revenue stream for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority—the state agency that runs the subways and buses in the city, along with two commuter railroads—and must be spent on operating expenses like salaries for its 70,000-person work force."
QUICK HITS
- So many of you have donated to our Webathon already (and mentioned Reason Roundup). I am so flattered and we are all so grateful. If you wanted to but haven't gotten the chance yet, here's the link to do so. We hope to be a bastion of sanity amid an increasingly hysterical news media—and your donation helps us continue to produce newsletters like this one.
- "For years, Alex Karp, Palantir's CEO, had declared the data management company to be 'involved in supporting progressive values,' saying he has repeatedly 'walked away' from contracts that targeted minorities or that he found otherwise unethical. Even as Palantir took on extensive data management contracts for the federal government, the company said it was not willing to allow its powerful tools to broadly track immigrants across America," reports Eva Dou at The Washington Post. "That commitment no longer holds. Palantir's software is helping U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement track undocumented immigrants and deport them faster, according to federal procurement filings and interviews with people who have knowledge of the project." ("Unfettered immigration in Europe, where I lived for well over a decade, has been a disaster—depressing wages for the working class and resulting in mass social dislocation," said Karp. "I remain an economic progressive, isolated among self-proclaimed progressives that are anything but.")
- The November jobs report isn't out yet from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, but private companies—like payroll processing company ADP—are filling the void. And the results are clear: A cooling labor market looks like it's getting even worse.
- A few photos were released of Jeffrey Epstein's island compound, for those who are curious.
- "Representative Elise Stefanik of New York called Speaker Mike Johnson a habitual liar," reports The New York Times. "Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina has told people she is so frustrated with the Louisiana Republican and sick of the way he has run the House—particularly how women are treated there—that she is planning to huddle with Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia next week to discuss following her lead and retiring early from Congress."
- I agree with this, and reject the idea that there's something massively wrong with Heritage hiring Scott Yenor. (This piece in The Atlantic complicates that view a bit and is worth reading):
One of the reasons we can't have nice things (guardrails on discourse) is because people like this will always abuse them as a weapon against every conservative thought that gives them the vapors. There is no comparison between Fuentes' views and the considered thoughts of a guy… https://t.co/S1ShvmYVK5
— Inez Stepman ⚪️????⚪️ (@InezFeltscher) December 3, 2025
- A good point:
the "rideshare work will be decimated the second waymo comes to your town" narrative is pretty clearly debunked by early adopter states. av rides are still 30–40% more expensive than Uber and Lyft bc maintenance, research, sensors, etc are pricy! the shift will likely be gradual.
— Nat Purser (@NatPurser) December 3, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Dell is now a villain. Got it.
'But I'm also persuaded by Odd Lots host Joe Weisenthal's skepticism'
Well then, since $250 does not mean much I suggest you and Joe each send me a check for that amount.
That's kind of silly. The question isn't whether $250 is so small that most people wouldn't mind giving that much away to a stranger, but rather whether it actually makes any difference to a person's life. Maybe it would, but I have my doubts as well. I'd bet that in 20 years we won't see any significant difference in wealth or quality of life for people getting these accounts compared to similarly situated people who don't.
Government needs to focus on getting out of people's way, not trying to fiddle with things to solve problems often created by other bad policies in the first place. Before starting a new program, maybe stop all the other interference in people's lives and business and see how that goes.
OK, so you send me $250 and I will stash it away for 20 years. We can then compare notes.
Look, humans are emotional animals driven by symbology and feelings, with behavior easily motivated by external drivers, including "nudges". If only 10% of these kids and families embrace the idea of saving money, it will be a win. And it's funded by a private donation.
Don't be so dismissive of the $250 - shrike once told us about an account with 1k that ballooned to 500k or something; this is probably his cheesy-poof fund.
It’s because he shorted Tesla earlier this year when it was $250.
The issue seems to be it is a private donation, therefore the learning isnt rely on government.
Get your own $250. Then just let everyone have tax free savings accounts and let billionaires donate to who they want without the government in the middle.
It's great that the funds are from a private donation and not taxes/borrowing. I'm not complaining about this happening at all (though I have my concerns about the habit government programs have of blowing up in cost and scope), just saying I personally don't think it will make much difference when all is said and done. I could be wrong.
roulette wheels and dealers shuffling cards close to home. It was about guaranteeing new revenue for mass transit in New York
Casino dealers are better fare collectors than MTA employees?
They have better enforcement against cheaters.
Used to…
'Even aside from the results, it's not a terrible model for teaching fiscal responsibility. Then again, is that really the government's job?'
Maybe not. But it sure beats the Democrat's government plan for teaching fiscal irresponsibility.
Why do we never get articles on NGO dem alliances.
"Follow the money"
To the casino?
Uh, how about fucking Somalia?
Didn't know Somalia had casinos.
Terrorist roulette is their favorite game.
Stop hurting chemjeff_conventional_leftist's feelings.
"The would-be operators of the three casinos have promised to pay more than $1.5 billion in one-time fees to the state if they become operational after receiving the licenses recommended by the New York Gaming Facility Location Board. The money would be another new revenue stream for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority—the state agency that runs the subways and buses in the city, along with two commuter railroads—and must be spent on operating expenses like salaries for its 70,000-person work force."
So a tax on stupid. Which economists tell us should then tend to reduce stupid. But for some reason I doubt it.
One thousand Taxes to punish stupid behavior, yet we still have income tax. And we still go to work. 🙂
"Unfettered immigration in Europe, where I lived for well over a decade, has been a disaster—depressing wages for the working class and resulting in mass social dislocation," said Karp. "I remain an economic progressive, isolated among self-proclaimed progressives that are anything but."
No, you remain an economic moron, assuming that by "progressive" you mean socialism. So sure, restrict immigration, but then condemn people to dysfunctional economic systems--and without those nifty food trucks.
The idea that corporate ethos in any way translates to social or political governance is, itself, rather strange.
If a mob of undocumented, drug-addicted, homeless people suddenly turned up sleeping in your building's lobby, offices, and meeting spaces, you'd evict them by force and as long as you didn't send 20% of them directly to the hospital with broken bones and lacerations, no one would bat an eye. If it turned out half of them were your employees, you'd shitcan them. The idea that you'd house them and provide them warm soup to placate another 10% of your employees who would start rioting otherwise is so detached it's unfathomable how you would run one division, building, or company that operated like that, let alone many.
Unless by "economically progressive" he means "making more money and employing more people" a CEO saying, "I'm an economic progressive but unfettered immigration is not something I can support professionally.", is still pretty insanely detached.
IMO part of the problem is the number of compulsively compassionate people and the way they look to government as their religion and church. I admire and support private charity, but despise public "charity", aka official wealth redistribution by force.
"Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina has told people she is so frustrated with the Louisiana Republican and sick of the way he has run the House—particularly how women are treated there—that she is planning to huddle with Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia next week to discuss following her lead and retiring early from Congress."
Too many requests for complicated sandwiches?
Chicks that cant take the heat need to get back in the kitchen.
What's the best argument that a one time $250 check will meaningfully alter the trajectory of many people's lives?
No matter what you do, it’s never enough.
On the other hand, it also means that if Dell kept his money, it also not affect the trajectory of anyone else’s life. So shut the fuck up about “tax the rich” and “inequality “.
If it isnt fixed in one action it isn't worth doing. Immediate gratification is the libertarian ideal.
But not having government programs to try to fix every perceived problem is a libertarian ideal. If this is all funded by private donations, it's much better than most government programs. But why can't it all be done in the private sector?
Biden just abandoned a lot of materiel to the Taliban.
https://x.com/paulsperry_/status/1996410488813764899?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Enough to field an army.
HA! Joke is on them. Joe forgot to pay for the extended warranty.
The tiny sliver of bright side - They will not be able to maintain most of it. Idiocy will kill more than a few of them.
Is the era of the billionaire philanthropist back?
I certainly hope so. I need a new overlord.
They weren’t survivors, they were trying to call for reinforcements.
https://x.com/bubblebathgirl/status/1996404503185391696?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Donating to the government is unusual...
What do you mean? We do it every time we volunteer to pay income tax.
But wait, there’s more!
https://x.com/bubblebathgirl/status/1996473975770358253?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Note the number of blue cans in the video.
Innocent fishermen.
Can voting machines be trusted?
https://x.com/rasmussen_poll/status/1996390398772629749?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA