Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

War

'Kill Everybody'

Plus: War with Venezuela looms, a National Guard member shot in D.C. dies, and Sean Duffy wants you to stop flying in your pajamas.

Christian Britschgi | 12.1.2025 9:32 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth | Orlando Barría/EFE/Newscom
(Orlando Barría/EFE/Newscom)

Pete Hegseth likes killing people. He's said as much repeatedly. Back in early September, he declared that the newly renamed Department of War would favor "maximum lethality, not tepid legality."

The secretary of war clearly meant it, judging from a story in The Washington Post. The paper reports that Hegseth issued verbal orders to the military forces striking suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean and Pacific to "kill everybody."

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

When the inaugural strike in this campaign against a boat off the Trinidadian coast left two survivors clinging to the wreckage of the craft, the commander in charge of the operation, in accordance with Hegseth's spoken directive, ordered a second strike to take them out too.

Some 80 people have reportedly been killed to date in the U.S. military's current anti-drug campaign.

The administration's officially secret legal justification for these strikes asserts that "narco-terrorists" are using the money earned from trafficking drugs to finance their war against the United States and its allies. Suspected drug smugglers are therefore, it claims, a legitimate counter-terrorism target.

Many international law experts have retorted that the boats themselves pose no imminent threat to Americans, and that the people on board the boats are not combatants but suspected criminals who one would normally expect to be arrested, not executed.

The administration's position "can justify almost anything the government wants to do to anyone," wrote Reason's Matthew Petti back in September.

These criticisms haven't stopped the Trump administration from carrying out its anti-drug campaign. A resolution that would have required congressional authorization for any military action against Venezuela failed in a close 49–51 vote in the U.S. Senate in early November.

Even if one accepts the dubious idea that these strikes are legal, the second strike described in the Post report would violate the laws of war. More plainly, it would be murder.

An order to kill boat occupants no longer able to fight "would in essence be an order to show no quarter, which would be a war crime," Todd Huntley, a former military lawyer who advised Special Operations, told the Post.

Over the weekend, the armed services committees in the House and Senate announced they would conduct investigations into the first boat strike.

Trump himself has said that the first boat strike was "very lethal, it was fine," but that he would not have wanted a second strike.

In a lengthy X post on Friday, Hegseth accused the Post of "fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting" but did not directly address the allegation about the second strike.

"Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict," he said.

As usual, the fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland.

As we've said from the beginning, and in every statement, these highly effective strikes are specifically…

— Secretary of War Pete Hegseth (@SecWar) November 28, 2025

If the Post's reporting is borne out, the second strike on helpless survivors would add a degree of barbarism to the administration's anti-drug campaign.

The increasingly granular debates about the legality of the boat strikes nevertheless feels somewhat tiresome and trivial, given the already established context of these attacks.

The Trump administration is using the military to target people suspected of breaking criminal laws against drug trafficking. It's choosing to kill these suspected criminals when they pose to immediate threat to anyone, instead of simply arresting them.

The justification for killing the suspected drug smugglers relies on an incredibly broad view of the executive power and on circular logic about who is a worthy target of military force.

The Post story highlights how murderous this whole operation is. That it is murderous is something we already knew.

Trump talks with Maduro. While the U.S. wages a quasi-war against suspected drug boats departing from Venezuela, it's also inching closer to fighting an actual war against that country. A phone call between Trump and Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has done little to defuse tensions.

Over the weekend, The New York Times reported that the presidents held a phone call the week prior to discuss a possible meeting between the two leaders. Trump confirmed on Sunday that the call took place but offered no details about what was discussed.

The Miami Herald reports that Maduro was told on the call that he could save himself and his family from U.S. intervention if he agreed to immediately leave Venezuela and turn control of the country over to the opposition.

According to the Herald, Maduro demanded he be given global amnesty. He allegedly also demanded that his regime retain control of the armed forces in exchange for allowing new elections.

According to the Herald's anonymous source, the Trump administration rejected these demands.

Since that call, the U.S. has declared Venezuelan airspace closed. Washington had already moved warships to the waters off the South American country, as well as declaring Maduro and members of his government members of a terrorist organization and putting a $50 million bounty on the Venezuelan president's head.


Scenes from D.C.: One of the two West Virginia National Guard members shot in D.C. last week has died, and another remains in critical condition.

Twenty-year-old Sarah Beckstrom died on Thanksgiving Day after being shot in a close-quarters ambush outside a metro station in downtown D.C., just a few blocks from the White House. The other injured guardsman, Andrew Wolfe, remains hospitalized.

The suspect, 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, is an Afghan national who had been a member of a CIA-organized counterterrorism unit. He came to the United States in 2021 under a Biden administration program that admitted Afghan allies following the country's fall to the Taliban. He travelled from Washington state, where he'd settled, to D.C., where he allegedly shot the two Guard members.


Quick Hits

  • Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy longs for a lost age of air travel where people didn't fly in their pajamas.
  • Works in Progress publishes a lengthy history of the West's turn against dense development.
  • Minnesota officials push back on Trump after he called Gov. Tim Walz "seriously retarded" in a social media post that also decried the impact of Somali immigration on the state.
  • Hong Kong has arrested 13 people as part of an investigation into an apartment fire that left at least 151 people dead.
  • Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has requested a pardon in his ongoing corruption trial.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The 'Free' World Is Coming for Your Private Messages

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

WarVenezuelaMilitaryWar on TerrorWar on DrugsDonald TrumpNicolas MaduroD.C.TerrorismTrump AdministrationReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (355)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Pete Hegseth likes killing people.

    There's nothing more American.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      You know who else likes killing people?

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        General pershing?

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        The Fugees?

        1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

          You got me by 36 seconds.

      3. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        The guy singing to Roberta Flack?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Don McLean?

      4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Merv Griffin in The Man With Two Brains?

      5. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Matt Welch?

        Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know. #RedWedding2

        https://x.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          I screenshotted that shit, just in case he ever tries to hide it.

      6. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        God?

      7. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        Hirohito?

    2. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

      So when an Afghanistanian does it, that's un-American, hence unethical?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        The joke ————>

        Hank

        1. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

          To be fair to Hank, he is a little retarded.

          1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            I think a lot senile is a better description.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              He’s a red diaper baby crackpot now in advanced stages of dementia.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Is he Waltz level retarded?

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              Not quite. But Walz hasn’t had dementia set in yet. Which should be……. interesting.

  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    According to the Herald, Maduro demanded he be given global amnesty.

    Why? Did he do something wrong?

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Sounds a lot like blanket autopen pardons for certain people.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Democrats did it first!

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      He’s been a very bad boy.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The paper reports that Hegseth issued verbal orders to the military forces striking suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean and Pacific to "kill everybody."

    Well obviously the worst part of all of this is giving the Dems' "unlawful orders" remarks credence.

    1. HorseConch   2 months ago

      Without being in the room, is it safe to assume that death to all occupants is the goal when firing a hellfire missile at a fiberglass boat?

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        Can’t they just teach them to shoot the equivalent of the boat’s leg?

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Can social workers be deployed via drones?

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            With today's AI and robotics, drones can BE social workers.

      2. Bubba Jones   2 months ago

        https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/venezuela-2025-law.htm

        The deliberate killing of survivors at sea represents one of the most clearly defined war crimes in international humanitarian law, with prohibitions stretching back more than a century and codified in multiple treaties and military manuals. The fundamental principle underlying these prohibitions is that individuals who are hors de combat — out of combat due to shipwreck, wounds, surrender, or other incapacitation — must not be made the object of attack. This principle applies universally in armed conflicts and represents a core tenet of the laws of war that balances military necessity with humanitarian considerations.

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          That applies to regular soldiers in uniform. Irregulars can be killed in the field.

          1. Roberta   2 months ago

            Exactly. And conversely, if you're not making war, or are an irregular yourself, you can kill anybody, any time.

          2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            His own link mentions it several times, but he either didn’t actually read it, he’s retarded, or he’s dishonest.

            “It first appeared in legal and military contexts to describe soldiers who were unable to fight due to injury or surrender,”

            “The Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea…”

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              “he’s retarded, or he’s dishonest”

              Can’t it be both?

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Read from an actual Cornell professor instead of watching Rachel maddow.

          https://x.com/BrianCox_RLTW/status/1994660774292119870

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Always amazed how these anonymous sources always pop up right when the narrative needs them.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Democracy dies in darkness, but darkness is never the cause of death.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Usually it’s shanked by a CIA-backed color revolution and their media allies.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Died by darkness, or with darkness?

    3. damikesc   2 months ago

      I am impressed how quickly they veered off of the Epstein thing for this. You'd think the media and Dems were in lockstep.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Epstein kind of boomeranged on the Dems since more of them got contributions from Epstein and/or visited his Isla Lolita.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          Or were outright programmed by him to say what he wanted them to say.

      2. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

        Seeing Shrike got fired and doesn't get Open Society talking points anymore, I think he'll still be trying to bring it up for a while.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          I think he’s on board with the Lincoln Project retards now. He’s into much the same as they are: neocons while lying about being neocons, TDS up the wazoo, pedophilia.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Even Soros cast him out. Pathetic.

      3. Super Scary   2 months ago

        When it became clear that Epstein actually hated Trump's guts, a lot of people gave up on the files thing. They didn't care about getting pedos, they just wanted to get Trump.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Let’s be honest here. ‘They’ ARE pedos.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...in accordance with Hegseth's spoken directive, ordered a second strike to take them out too.

    You know who else ordered double taps?

    1. Anomalous   2 months ago

      "Columbus" in Zombieland?

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Suicides by people with evidence against Hillary Clinton?

    3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Fred and Ginger?

    4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Sarc when he saved up enough to drink at a bar?

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Isn’t he 86’d from every bar within a hundred mile radius of his piss soaked refrigerator box by now?

    5. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Nobody was coming to rescue them. The second strike was a mercy.

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Well, at least they had fentanyl...

    6. shadydave   2 months ago

      Bill "Bojangles" Robinson?

    7. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      deleted

  5. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Minnesota officials push back on Trump after he called Gov. Tim Walz "seriously retarded" in a social media post that also decried the impact of Somali immigration on the state.

    They said walz is super retarded.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Dems pissed about "retarded" but not about missing $1B in taxpayer fraud to fucking terrorists. Typical.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        They’re sensitive to that word, as most of them are retarded. My own senator, Patty Murray being a prime example. Or Minnesota’s Tampon Tim.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Even the NYT acknowledged Walz’s corruption and fraud. Tim’s toast.

    3. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      Is there any better way to describe putting tampons in the boys bathrooms than "retarded"?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Intentionally trying to "queer" American norms and destroy our society?

        1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

          My description is less wordy.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        “Fucktarded”, short for “fucking retarded”?

      3. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

        Hegseth did that too?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Hank, you would know all about being retarded.

        2. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

          Is Hegseth a Democrat? I never knew.

      4. Pear Satirical (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   2 months ago

        I'd argue saying "I've become friends with school shooters" on a national televised debate stage and promoting organizations that scammed over a billion dollars are more than sufficient proof of retardation.

      5. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        It totally fits.

        https://www.reddit.com/r/southpark/comments/1hqn5x1/jimmy_vs_pc_principal/

    4. Minadin   2 months ago

      Minnesota DHS workers are blaming Walz in specific for all of the Somali fraud:

      Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota. We let Tim Walz know of fraud early on, hoping for a partnership in stopping fraud but no, we got the opposite response. Tim Walz systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports.

      https://x.com/Minnesota_DHS/status/1994993895428461006

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        And let’s not forget this regarding Timmy.

        https://x.com/c_3c_3/status/1995207974005199189?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

        1 out of 67…

        Remember there was only 1 Democrat that voted to end healthcare for illegals in Tim Walz run Minnesota.

        Who was it?

        Melissa Hortman

        She was murdered by Vance Boelter.

        Who claimed Walz also wanted him to kill Amy Klobuchar.

        Walz made Minnesota is a disaster.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          Oh fuck. I didn't need another rabbit hole to go down.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Walz is one of many poster children for getting rid of the democrats.

      2. shadydave   2 months ago

        What fraud? I didn't read about any of that on Reason.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          He's a maverick. Like John McCain. And libertarian like Polis. He was the adult in the room that saved Minnesota from the Jesse Ventura fight club. Saved the state from Christian Nationalists and made sure that dudes could swing their dicks around in high school girls locker rooms. And unlimited free tampons for all. He embodies all of the characteristics of a Reason poster boy.

    5. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      There is also the report of about 400 state employees that showed evidence that waltz knew about the fraud, and harassed and targeted wistleblowers

      1. Pear Satirical (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   2 months ago

        Remember when Democrats cared about whistleblowers?

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

          No I dont

          1. Pear Satirical (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   2 months ago

            Let me rephrase, remember when Democrats pretended to care about whistleblowers so they could impeach evil orange man?

    6. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Even the NYT realizes Waltz is retarded.

      https://www.zerohedge.com/political/nyt-torches-tim-walz-after-somalians-scam-woke-minnesota-1-billion-his-watch

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Indiana Republican opposes redistricting because he has a son with disabilities and Trump calling Walz "retarded" is mean or something.

        What a party of unmitigated losers.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          That’s really retarded from that state legislator.

        2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          They're not known as the stupid party for nothing.

        3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          What a fucking retard.

    7. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Just remember, that asshat was one drunken stumble away from being President.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Like I said below, we dodged a massive cruise missile.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        That would have been the line.

    8. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      They said walz is super retarded.

      Truth is a defense against libel.

  6. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    ..issued verbal orders to the military forces striking suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean and Pacific to "kill everybody."

    What other function does the military have but to kill?

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Kill and break shit.

      The leftists want to grift the "nation building" budgets.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        George Bush and the Republican party as a whole are certainly leftist. For example TARP bailouts, medicare prescription drug, no child left behind. Course so is Trump, so maybe a little future nation building is in the cards.

        1. Bubba Jones   2 months ago

          Corporate bailouts are classic right wing statism.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            Obama is on line two.

            1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

              Yup, he sucks too,. Bailouts, bombing Libya, arming Syrian rebels, Obamacare....

              1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

                Obama and Clinton revived the African slave trade by creating anarchy in Libya.

                1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                  The democrat party was founded on support for slavery.

        2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          It's okay because Republicans did it first.

      2. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

        Idaho Bob, the function of our Armed Forces is not what you said. Believe me, you really don't even want an Armed Forces that believes what you said. The sole legitimate purpose of our Armed Forces and everyone who funds, regulates or directs them is to support our Constitution.

        Article VI of our Constitution emphasizes that the first, foremost and constant focus (duty) of all legislators and "all executive and judicial Officers" (state and federal) is "to support [our] Constitution." Article II emphasized that when "[t]he President" acts as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States" everything the president does (and everything the president uses the foregoing forces to do) is subject to the president's duty (oath) to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" to "the best of [his] Ability."

        As a consequence of the foregoing, Congress enacted a law (5 U.S.C. 3331) requiring every "individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services" to swear or affirm (publicly acknowledge that he or she knows and understands) that his or her first and constant duty is to "support and defend" our "Constitution" against "all enemies, foreign and domestic" and to "bear true faith and allegiance to" our "Constitution," alone.

    2. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      Actually, the killing is just a method to accomplish the main two things a military does; take ground, or defend ground.

      1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

        That is just the army. The navy, air force, and space force have no ground with which to concern themselves. They just kill, kill, kill!

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          You should be a recruiter.

        2. Sailor1989   2 months ago

          I walked into the shrink's office and said, "Shrink, I wanna kill! I mean, I wanna kill. I wanna see blood, gore and guts, and veins in my teeth. Eat dead, burnt bodies. Kill! Kill! Kill!"
          Then I started jumping up and down yelling "Kill! Kill! Kill!"
          Then he started jumping up and down with me and we was both jumping up and down yelling "Kill! Kill"
          Then a Sergeant came in, pinned a medal on me, sent me down the hall and said "You're our boy!"

      2. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

        Longtobefree, the focus of American Armed Forces is not mere "ground" but the grounds of our constitution as a nation. Article VI of our Constitution emphasizes that the first, foremost and constant focus (duty) of all legislators and "all executive and judicial Officers" (state and federal) is "to support [our] Constitution." Article II emphasized that when "[t]he President" acts as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States" everything the president does (and everything the president uses the foregoing forces to do) is subject to the president's duty (oath) to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" to "the best of [his] Ability."

        As a consequence of the foregoing, Congress enacted a law (5 U.S.C. 3331) requiring every "individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services" to "support and defend" our "Constitution" against "all enemies, foreign and domestic" and to "bear true faith and allegiance to" our "Constitution," alone.

        1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

          WTF are you babbling about?
          The armed forces do not go into District Court to argue Con Law

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            These arguments are funny since lawyers from JAG are literally in the room when decisions are made.

          2. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

            But SkyNet, have you served anywhere in public service? Did you understand the significance of the federal statute I quoted? The statute and the Constitution (Articles VI and II) require oaths. Those people swear or affirm (they publicly acknowledge that they know and understand) that their first and constant duty is to fulfill their oaths in all official conduct. It's insightful that some people find the significance of those oaths difficult to grasp.

    3. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

      Don't look, anyone who has taken an oath as a public servant should know the primary and overarching function of our Armed Forces.

      Article VI of our Constitution emphasizes that the first, foremost and constant focus (duty) of all legislators and "all executive and judicial Officers" (state and federal) is "to support [our] Constitution." Article II emphasized that when "[t]he President" acts as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States" everything the president does (and everything the president uses the foregoing forces to do) is subject to the president's duty (oath) to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" to "the best of [his] Ability."

      As a consequence of the foregoing, Congress enacted a law (5 U.S.C. 3331) requiring every "individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services" to swear or affirm (publicly acknowledge that he or she knows and understands) that his or her first and constant duty is to "support and defend" our "Constitution" against "all enemies, foreign and domestic" and to "bear true faith and allegiance to" our "Constitution," alone.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Trump himself has said that the first boat strike was "very lethal, it was fine," but that he would not have wanted a second strike.

    Hey, you live and learn.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...as well as declaring Maduro and members of his government members of a terrorist organization and putting a $50 million bounty on the Venezuelan president's head.

    Maduro has to know at this point his days are numbered. I mean, did he even leaf through his copy of The Art of the Deal???

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Or watch even one episode of The Apprentice?

      1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

        Would LOVE to know if Trump said "You're Fired" on their call.

  9. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

    Well, I see it’s Bitches..er..Britches for the Roundup. Liz must be on vacation or assignment.

    Over the long holiday weekend, our good friend Tampon Tim has found himself in more than a bit of a pickle. His employees are turning on him.

    https://x.com/minnesota_dhs/status/1994993895428461006?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota. We let Tim Walz know of fraud early on, hoping for a partnership in stopping fraud but no, we got the opposite response. Tim Walz systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports. Instead of partnership, we got the full weight of retaliation by Tim Walz, certain DFL members and an indifferent mainstream media. It’s scary, isolating and left us wondering who we can turn to.

    In addition to retaliating against whistleblower, Tim Walz disempowered the Office of the Legislative Auditor, allowing agencies to disregard their audit findings and guidance. Media and politicians supporting Tim Walz or the DFL-agenda attacked whistleblowers who were trying to raise red flags on fraudulent activities.

    This is a cascade of systemic failures leading up to Tim Walz. Agency leaders appointed by Tim Walz willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet - even to the extent of threatening families of whistleblowers. These same leaders are not qualified for their jobs, instead getting leadership jobs via Tim Walz’s friendship so state government were left floundering. DFL lawmakers refused to acknowledge fraud and deflected any serious conversation to stop fraud. Biased mainstream media such as WCCO and MPR showed absolutely no interest in covering fraud happening in our own state. Programs, especially in behavioral health and disability services were built without any guardrails against fraud, all in an attempt to extract more funding from legislature and the federal government.

    As staff, we firsthand witnessed and observed fraud happening yet we were shutdown, reassigned and told to keep quiet. Sometimes more. Leadership did not want to appear to discriminate against certain communities and were unwilling to take action, such as stopping fraud, that would have an adverse impact on their image. To date, no single agency leader has been held responsible for their role in fraud whether it’s Shireen Gandhi, Jess Geil, Jodi Harpstead, Natasha Merz, Eric Grumdahl or others.

    It is a structure created and maintained by Tim Walz who has created an environment of inter-related agencies and institutions including the media - that help foster fraud through retaliation and turning a blind eye in exchange for political gain in the form of high power agency leadership jobs or other perks.

    Fundamentally, Tim Walz is dishonest, lacks ethics and integrity, has poor leadership abilities, and has never taken any accountability for his role in fraud. Instead, Tim Walz deflects by blaming national politics for his own failings and distracts the public with inveterate lying. These lies include his reference of a budget surplus under his tenure. Fact is, Minnesota never had a surplus, we had been given federal ARPA funds that were conflated as surplus money otherwise, we’d be in a deficit. And those ARPA funds, which were meant to be temporary funds were used to create more leadership positions for Tim Walz “buddies.”

    As such, we can’t fight fraud in Minnesota alone hence why we’re appealing to the federal levels of government. We need all the help we can get as Tim Walz’s agency leaders have upped their brazen approach in covering up their knowledge of fraud.

    We are grateful to numerous solid politicians (esp the Fraud Committee) and media outlets who are trying to halt fraud. We are also grateful to other whistleblowers who are bravely stepping up.

    Thank You NY Times for bringing the plight of Minnesota to the national stage.

    @nytimes

    We really dodged a cruise missile last year, didn’t we.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      But if someone calls him retarded all sins are forgiven.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        What would Garrison Keillor say?

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      We dodged 2.

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        If that POS had been elected, we would have never heard of this.

        Makes me wonder what really happened to the Hortman's.

        1. HorseConch   2 months ago

          Check this lady out on X. She was trying to help by getting media attention, and was literally scared out of the state.

          https://x.com/annbauerwriter

          1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

            Damn. Even her family thought she was crazy.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Sorry I duped your post.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        That’s cool. It should be posted multiple times so the retards running Reason get it.

        1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          They are never gonna get, never gonna get it, nerver gonna get it. Gonna get it?

    4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Also has come out, unless mentioned in the tweet, that Waltz was actively suppressing and targeting whistleblowers.

      Didnt read the entire tweet you posted.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy longs for a lost age of air travel where people didn't fly in their pajamas.

    Nothing beats a Jet2 holiday.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      And now you can save fifty pounds.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      I couldn’t care less what someone is wearing.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        No Victoria Secret catalog for this guy.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          The one with trannys on the cover? I'll pass on that.

      2. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

        It's mostly the behavior that comes with the dress.

    3. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      As opposed to the fact that airports are a constitution-free zone?

      1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        I wear sweats, slip on shoes, and t-shirts when flying. No metal at all. No belts, boots, coats, etc.
        Because of the security bullshit.

        I see the guys in suits occasionally and they practically have to strip.

        1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

          I go with cowboy boots, easy to get on/off.

    4. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

      How else you going to stay comfortable in those economy-class seats?

  11. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    ...a lengthy history of the West's turn against dense development.

    Americans don't have to live on top of each other like filthy Eurotrash. We got the space.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Minnesota officials push back on Trump after he called Gov. Tim Walz "seriously retarded" in a social media post...

    Did they consider all the possible flavors of retardation before their knee jerk reaction?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      They haven’t met Molly Godiva yet, have they.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        Zing!

      2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        You not even smarter than the average somalian

      3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        The Red Retard.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Tiananmen Tony.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      https://twitchy.com/grateful-calvin/2025/11/30/one-hundred-percent-responsible-minnesota-dhs-employees-nuke-tim-walz-over-somali-fraud-n2422278

      Of course, the Times didn't really break this story. That work was done by Chris Rufo. As usual, the legacy media glommed onto the corruption and fraud that Rufo had already exposed and tried to pretend that they had done the investigative journalism.

      Still, it is revealing that Walz is so damaged that even a lazy, lefty rag like the Old Gray Lady saw fit to put him in its crosshairs.

      And if the mood among his state employees is any indication, things are about to get a whole lot worse for Walz.

      Last night, the employees of the Minnesota Department of Human Services (not the official department account itself) unleashed a blistering, scathing indictment of Walz, calling him out for corruption at every turn in a lengthy post that is nothing short of molten fire.

      The entire post is very long, but every single word (even the misspelled ones) is worth reading.


      ... repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports. Instead of partnership, we got the full weight of retaliation by Tim Walz, certain DFL members and an indifferent mainstream media. It’s scary, isolating and left us wondering who we can turn to.

      In addition to retaliating against whistleblower, Tim Walz disempowered the Office of the Legislative Auditor, allowing agencies to disregard their audit findings and guidance. Media and politicians supporting Tim Walz or the DFL-agenda attacked whistleblowers who were trying to raise red flags on fraudulent activities.

      This is a cascade of systemic failures leading up to Tim Walz. Agency leaders appointed by Tim Walz willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet - even to the extent of threatening families of whistleblowers. These same leaders are not qualified for their jobs, instead getting leadership jobs via Tim Walz’s friendship so state government were left floundering. DFL lawmakers refused to acknowledge fraud and deflected any serious conversation to stop fraud. Biased mainstream media such as WCCO and MPR showed absolutely no interest in covering fraud happening in our own state. Programs, especially in behavioral health and disability services were built without any guardrails against fraud, all in an attempt to extract more funding from legislature and the federal government.

      As staff, we firsthand witnessed and observed fraud happening yet we were shutdown, reassigned and told to keep quiet. Sometimes more. Leadership did not want to appear to discriminate against certain communities and were unwilling to take action, such as stopping fraud, that would have an adverse impact on their image. To date, no single agency leader has been held responsible for their role in fraud whether it’s Shireen Gandhi, Jess Geil, Jodi Harpstead, Natasha Merz, Eric Grumdahl or others.

      It is a structure created and maintained by Tim Walz who has created an environment of inter-related agencies and institutions including the media - that help foster fraud through retaliation and turning a blind eye in exchange for political gain in the form of high power agency leadership jobs or other perks.

      Fundamentally, Tim Walz is dishonest, lacks ethics and integrity, has poor leadership abilities, and has never taken any accountability for his role in fraud. Instead, Tim Walz deflects by blaming national politics for his own failings and distracts the public with inveterate lying. These lies include his reference of a budget surplus under his tenure. Fact is, Minnesota never had a surplus, we had been given federal ARPA funds that were conflated as surplus money otherwise, we’d be in a deficit. And those ARPA funds, which were meant to be temporary funds were used to create more leadership positions for Tim Walz 'buddies.'

      As such, we can’t fight fraud in Minnesota alone hence why we’re appealing to the federal levels of government. We need all the help we can get as Tim Walz’s agency leaders have upped their brazen approach in covering up their knowledge of fraud.

      We are grateful to numerous solid politicians (esp the Fraud Committee) and media outlets who are trying to halt fraud. We are also grateful to other whistleblowers who are bravely stepping up.

      Thank You NY Times for bringing the plight of Minnesota to the national stage.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        This is really remarkable. That's a lot of signatories and they're naming names. We could very well see DOJ indictments targeting Walz. His only response so far is "release the MRI".

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Yeah, I think Walz is in some seriously deep shit.

          1. Pear Satirical (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   2 months ago

            Problem is that any legal action will be decried as political retribution, no matter how blatant it is

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

              True. However, for the Administration, it’s damned if they do; damned if they don’t in the media so they might as well do it, media be damned.

            2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              Ok, who cares? After four years of Democrat lawfare, it really doesn’t matter.

              Revenge is ok. And burning democrats is just doing God’s work.

            3. DesigNate   2 months ago

              I see you already know what Jacob Sullum’s angle will be.

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            Time for Timmy to return to China.

      2. MK Ultra   2 months ago

        The Times realizes that Governor JazzHands is a net-negative for the Democrats, so it's best to sideline him now before he says more stupid shit.

    3. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

      That possibility involves a context a little too self-referential for mystical MAGAts to sort out, much less actually grasp.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        And yet again, Hank, you manage to miss the point by more than a country mile.

    4. Bubba Jones   2 months ago

      MEAN TWEETS

  13. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has requested a pardon in his ongoing corruption trial.

    I think Trump will grant him one.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      If Trump publicly used Biden's autopen to sign Netanyahu's pardon, it would be totally worth it.

  14. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Didn't think the UK was still working to be worse.

    London man was arrested for social media pictures taken while on vacation in Florida, because he was using a shotgun and an AR-15 style rifle.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15341621/IT-consultant-arrested-LinkedIn-post-shotgun-Florida.html

    The 50-year-old said he offered to prove that the pictures had been taken in the US - where owning or shooting guns are legal. Officers told him it was not necessary.

    A week later on August 23, the officers returned and arrested him on suspicion of possessing a firearm with intent to cause fear of violence.

    After he was charged, Mr Richelieu-Booth claimed he was unable to work because his phone and computers were seized by police.

    Mr Richelieu-Booth's story was shared by billionaire Elon Musk, who was furious at the treatment of the Brit.

    He wrote: 'And this is why we have the first and second amendments in America'.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      I bet he chewed a pop tart into the shape of a gun when he was a kid.

    2. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      This is the kind of asylum seeker I'm ok with.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      At this point, fuck the UK. Maybe Trump can issue one of those "Let Putin do what he wants with Britain" tweets.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Well, they are looking at ending trial by jury.

        We need to distance ourselves from nascent authoritarians like them,

        1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

          So they endured the Bltixz and send troops to fight D-Day for ewhat?

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            That was 5 generations ago. Fortunately for the Silent Gen Brits, most of them are dead and don't have to watch their progeny fuck over the values they fought and died for.

            1. Pear Satirical (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   2 months ago

              Reminds me of that WW2 veteran who was saddened by what the country him and his friends fought for has become.

              1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

                Yeah I saw that. The Dude's like 98 and makes more sense than Starmer.

  15. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Islam is a religion of peace...

    Teenage girl 'tied up and drowned in swamp in honour killing had upset her father by refusing to wear Islamic headscarf and using social media'

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15341253/Teenage-girl-tied-drowned-swamp-honour-killing-upset-father-refusing-wear-Islamic-headscarf-using-social-media.html

    A teenage girl who was allegedly tied up and thrown into a swamp to drown in an honour killing had infuriated her strict father by refusing to wear an Islamic headscarf and by using social media, Dutch prosecutors have said.

    The body of 18-year-old Ryan Al Najjar was found gagged, her hands tied behind her back and her ankles taped together, dumped in a swamp six days after she vanished from the family home in Joure in May last year.

    Her brothers, Mohamed, 23, and Muhanad Al Najjar, 25, are now on trial for her murder, while their father, Khaled - accused of ordering the killing - has fled back to Syria.

    New details revealed by prosecutors over the weekend claim Ryan had violated her family's strict expectations by adopting a Western lifestyle, mixing with boys, refusing to wear a headscarf, and using social media.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Cultural enrichment.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Valuable ethnic folk traditions.

    2. Eeyore   2 months ago

      Pro-choice allies.

      1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        58th trimester

    3. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

      Isn't i-Slam a splinter-off of that other religion of peace, Christian National Socialism?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Kill yourself.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Uh, no, Hank. Try looking up Mohammad, 7th century AD first before you put your whole leg in your mouth again.

      3. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        Muzzies believe the paragon of virtue is a murderous, slave owning, pedofile.
        If you follow Islam you are incapable of being a moral person.

      4. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        Easily solved by Libertarian spoiler votes.

    4. Rick James   2 months ago

      Her brothers, Mohamed, 23, and Muhanad Al Najjar, 25, are now on trial for her murder, while their father, Khaled - accused of ordering the killing - has fled back to Syria.

      It's like a tariff on immigrants.

    5. damikesc   2 months ago

      Iran has a dating app where parents can sign up daughters at 13 years old to be married.

      Islam --- never change.

    6. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Somebody drowned somethings.

    7. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Cultural swimming lessons.

  16. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    " . . . judging from a story in The Washington Post. "

    Well, that is pointless.
    WaPo has actual awards for lying.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      And there are men out there with gold medals they 'won' for punching women in the face. Leftism is cancer.

  17. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'If the Post's reporting is borne out'

    And by borne out do you mean a consensus among NYT, CNN, MSNBC, and other Democrats?

  18. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'According to the Herald, Maduro demanded he be given global amnesty.'

    I think Maduro has confused Trump with Biden (and his autopen).

  19. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    The median iq of somolia is 67. The definition of legally retarded in the US is 70. There is no reason to let in literal anti American thriving retard into our country. Somalia is a shit hole because of Somalians.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Same with Indiana.

      The rate of inbreeding in those countries is startling. We joke about Alabama and their incest breeding rate is sub 1%. India is above 25%. Somalia cannot even maintain statistics.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Indiana? WTF? India was the topic for me. They are a shithole, just as Somalia.

        It has been asked that if Indians are such super powered GDP machines --- wouldn't India not want to get rid of so many of them?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          I was wondering about that as while Indiana is considered a “shit hole” by Chicagoans, that’s mostly projection these days.

          1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

            Well there's a Republican in IN holding up redistricting to punish Trump for calling Walz retarded. Don't know how inbred he is.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

              No clue how inbred he is, but he’s definitely retarded.

        2. shadydave   2 months ago

          There's no walking it back now. A mob from Bloomington is heading to your front door as I type this.

          1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

            Do you think those morons can read a map?

  20. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'The suspect, 29-year-old Rahmanullah Lakanwal, is an Afghan national who had been a member of a CIA-organized counterterrorism unit. He came to the United States in 2021 under a Biden administration program that admitted Afghan allies following the country's fall to the Taliban. He travelled from Washington state, where he'd settled, to D.C., where he allegedly shot the two Guard members.'

    Let's count the red flags.
    Afghani
    Immigrant
    CIA
    Operative
    Biden
    Seattle

    Nothing to worry about.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Reason will have another article about how mean Trump is to our afghan allies later today. Probably by Autumn or Sullum.

    2. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      Under the heading of bothersome details, he was a member of an Afghani group used by the CIA for certain things, not a real individual CIA officer in the "true spy operative" sense of CIA.

      And I would specify unvetted immigrant.

      1. JFree   2 months ago

        He was a 15 year old who was brainwashed and put into a CIA death squad. It is the CIA who turned him into a monster for eight years - and then, as is always the case, ignored him (both in Afghanistan - and later here) when he became disturbed by what he was doing and suffered PTSD.

        He is basically Jason Bourne. And he was VERY vetted. It's just that commenters here don't really want to hold the deep state (or anyone else) accountable for anything.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          Yeah mostly correct. But he was only vetted to be a CIA tool not to be a resident of Seattle. I agree, the deep state is responsible. They created a monster to serve their interests in Afghanistan and both the Biden and Trump administrations set him loose in the US. He's responsible for his crimes but there's plenty of blame to go around. His charity handlers in Seattle were aware that he was going off the rails but there's not much they could do about it. There are no good guys. Just a dead 20 year old woman.

    3. shrike   2 months ago

      The Trump Administration granted that murderous piece of shit asylum in April 2025.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Which regrets the lack of vetting in place at the time, and has ordered all such grants of asylum stopped until the processes can be reworked to provide better vetting.

        And that pause is already being excoriated in the press.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        No, dumbass, the Biden Administration let him in back in 2021. You might want to get your facts straight before puting your own cock in your mouth, Shrike.

        1. shrike   2 months ago

          In 2021. Granted asylum April 2025.

          Those are the facts you dumb cracka.

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

            Aren't they all supposed to get asylum shrike?

          2. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

            So you agree letting in migrants and asylum seekers is a bad thing? Or are you praising trump? I'm not sure what's going on here.

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

              Neither is he.

  21. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Like Senator "Liawatha" Warren...

    Inconvenient Indian author discovers he has no indigenous roots

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/inconvenient-indian-author-discovers-he-has-no-indigenous-roots/ar-AA1R8mjR

    An award-winning a Canadian-American author whose career was tied to his apparent indigenous ancestry has recently learned that he has no Cherokee roots.

    Thomas King revealed the findings on Monday in an opinion piece published in the Globe and Mail newspaper.

    The announcement follows a mid-November meeting with King and members of the Tribal Alliance Against Frauds, a US-based group dedicated to exposing people who falsely claim Native American heritage.

    The 82-year-old said he accepts the findings of a genealogist with the organisation but writes in the essay: "I feel as though I've been ripped in half."

    "Not the Indian I had in mind. Not an Indian at all," King wrote.

    King won the RBC Taylor prize for non-fiction for his book The Inconvenient Indian, in 2014, and the Stephen Leacock memorial medal for humour for his work Indians on Vacation, in 2020.

    He said he never meant to intentionally mislead people, believing that he genuinely had Native American ancestry.

    King said he grew up with a family story that his father's biological father - King's apparent paternal grandfather - was a man named Elvin Hunt, who was part Cherokee.

    1. Eeyore   2 months ago

      Lol

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Hey, if a guy can keep his penis but put on some makeup and a bra and become a legal woman, then a paleface can certainly stick a feather in his hair and claim a share of proceeds from the local casino.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        NO!

        We've been told unequivocally that BIOLOGY defines race, using a few genes. So it cannot be changed! Even thinking that someone can change their race ignores the cultural truth of the infringed race and must be therefore condemned by all right-thinking persons (birthing and non-birthing).

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Rachel Dolezal on line 2...

        2. Zeb   2 months ago

          Well, for American Indians, especially when it comes to getting a cut from casinos, the important factor seems to be simply being allowed on tribal membership roles. A lot of the "Indians" running the casinos look pretty pale-face to me.

          1. Eeyore   2 months ago

            I don't believe native Americans still exist. After the successful genocide. If you can survive an infection from the flu, you aren't native enough

          2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

            Well Asians are white according to Harvard. And they're not the Redskins anymore thanks to sunscreen, A/C, and whiny protesters.

    3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      All natives have high cheek bones.

    4. HorseConch   2 months ago

      So the name King isn't Indian after all? Color me shocked.

    5. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      I grew up believing I was part Cherokee. As was common in those days the family bloodline on my mother's side was somewhat sketchy and included some ne're do wells who came and went making babies along the way. With a few exceptions the stories were mostly apocryphal. But my mom was convinced that somewhere along the way somebody got knocked up by a noble savage. After her death I did the DNA thing and came up absolute zero for Indian. I told my brother and sister and they responded in unison "good thing mom's not here".

      1. Eeyore   2 months ago

        This might be how we got Pocahontas.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        It was common in the 90s for white families to make these claims due to no verification and college scholarships.

      3. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        In the Southeast it was common for families to claim some Indian ancestry to explain the dark eyes and hair they inherited from Black ancestors.

    6. shadydave   2 months ago

      Is he related to Shaun "Talcum X" King?

  22. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

    No Kings and the Seditious Six.

    https://x.com/realslokhova/status/1995450474049507832?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

    Slotkin, Goodlander and other seditionists posted the No Kings video on October 17, 2025. The purpose was to portray President Trump as a dictator. The format is the same as the later Call to Insurrection video. No Kings was financed by Soros, Hoffman and other Dark Money groups with the purpose of deposing President Trump. That's how they always start the Color Revolutions: with "protests" to overthrow the leader.

    Slotkin then spoke at the Brookings on October 29, 2025. Brookings is Hillary, Talbott (Intel-community connected Clinton buddy), Goodlander's husband and Hillary's advisor Jake Sullivan. Slotkin is of course CIA, "endorsed" by John Brennan and co.

    Sullivan and Goodlander are friends with Bill Burns who attended their wedding. Sullivan is the organizer, Goodlander is the legal "brains" behind the insurrection, as an aide to AG Garland, she effectively ran Biden's DoJ.

    Brookings is where the co-conspirators all meet and agree on the strategy. They did exactly the same with Russiagate, etc.

    After proclaiming the democratically-elected President a "dictator", and organizing "protests", the next step in the Color Revolution playbook is to dehumanize law-enforcement so that when much bigger "protests" take place, it would be "justified" to attack them.

    The seditionists, with help of their co-conspirators in the media, would then make any violence President Trump's fault. That was one of the purposes of Slotkin's speech at Brookings.

    On November 18, 2025, the Sedious Six posted their Call to Insurrection video. The purpose was to gain control over the military and the Intelligence Community.

    Color Revolution playbook.

  23. Rick James   2 months ago

    Pete Hegseth likes killing people. He's said as much repeatedly. Back in early September, he declared that the newly renamed Department of War would favor "maximum lethality, not tepid legality."

    I see Reason has bought into the 90s vision of the military where its job is to win hearts and minds, mend the environment, spread diversity and inclusion and provide hugs not drugs, which prompted that official's (who I can't remember) response: The purpose of the military is to kill people and break things.

    You don't have to like it, Britches, but that's its purpose.

    1. mtrueman   2 months ago

      "I see Reason has bought into the 90s vision of the military"

      The 90s? The Geneva Convention of 1949 classified those who are hors de combat as non combatants. They are to be treated as POWs.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Hoping someone makes a mistake and clicks on your name to double the monthly hits on your website?
        Or just spouting the lefty bullshit for which you are so famous?

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Pirates smuggling drugs are not combatants and therefore cannot be POWs, misconstrueman.

        1. mtrueman   2 months ago

          "not combatants and therefore cannot be POWs"

          That's not what the Geneva Convention of 1949 tells us. Check it out if you doubt me. Non combatants are to be treated as POWs once they are hors de combat. Now, if the victims, though wounded, had brandished a weapon, a second strike would have been kosher, but that's not what is being reported.

          "Pirates smuggling drugs are not combatants"

          You're playing games with words. Piracy and drug running are entirely different occupations.

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            Hoping someone makes a mistake and clicks on your name to double the monthly hits on your website?
            Or just spouting the same lefty bullshit for which you are so famous?

          2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            They’re not combatants, nor are they civilians, dipshit. You can shoot at and destroy pirates.

            1. mtrueman   2 months ago

              They are alleged to have been smuggling drugs. Check your sources if you doubt me. Smuggling drugs and engaging in piracy are two entirely different animals. You need to get your facts straight before you post, and don't let your emotions get the better of you.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                Regardless, due to their status, they’re fair game.

          3. Eeyore   2 months ago

            If you just redefine fentanyl as a chemical weapon, then anyone suspected of transporting it is a suspected combatant.

        2. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

          Insane, the law doesn't focus on POWs, alone. The law even expressly emphasizes that it doesn't protect only "lawful combatants." "War crimes" are defined in 18 U.S. Code § 2441 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2441), including the following. An offender is guilty of "Murder" if he "intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill" or even if he kills "unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause." An offender is guilty of "Intentionally causing serious bodily injury" if he "intentionally causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the law of war."

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            And these are pirates.

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              Are they? They are smugglers, but doesn't piracy necessarily involve some kind of theft?

              1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                They are declared FTOs.

            2. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

              Insane, it's the law not your label that governs. The law doesn't make any exception for what you label "pirates" or what Trump labels "narco-terrorists."

      3. damikesc   2 months ago

        Literally zero of the people killed qualify under the Conventions for anything.

        This insane belief that terrorists qualify for protections us laughable. If you do not abide by the rules, why would you warrant any of the protections?

        1. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

          damikesc, are you sure about that?

          One federal statute seems to govern even if Trump's claims were true that his victims were, at some point, enemy combatants. "War crimes" are defined in 18 U.S. Code § 2441 (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2441). Subsection (b)(2) confirms that the following can be found guilty: any "member of the Armed Forces of the United States" or any other "offender" (e.g., Trump or Hegseth) who "is present in the United States, regardless of the nationality of the victim."

          War crimes include the following. An offender is guilty of "Murder" if he "intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill" or even if he kills "unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause." An offender is guilty of "Intentionally causing serious bodily injury" if he "intentionally causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the law of war."

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Poor jack/damon. Doesn't understand we've dealt with 30 years of designated terrorist organizations and the laws/processes involved with them.

            Jack. Please stop getting legal arguments from reddit.

            1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

              Well it's interesting that none of the "seditionist six" was able to identify any illegal order that Trump has demanded of any member of the military or IC. But WAPO comes through with claims by anonymous sources that maybe the Trump administration has committed war crimes. Damon jumps on the bandwagon quoting chapter and verse but the reality is we will never know the truth of the matter. Obama famously droned a teenage US citizen and the media responded with a collective shrug. Don't remember Damon's response. Maybe Jack can post a link.

            2. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

              JesseAZ, if you think I got the law wrong, please feel free to show us the law that you think governs.

          2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

            There are only 2 war crimes.
            1. Starting a war
            2. Losing a war

            1. Pear Satirical (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   2 months ago

              The first is only a war crime if you commit the second.

        2. mtrueman   2 months ago

          "This insane belief that terrorists qualify for protections us laughable. "

          I thought the victims were accused of smuggling illegal drugs. Terrorism is a whole different thing. And terrorists do indeed qualify for protection. Look at all the Al Qaeda operatives seized after 9/11. They were brought to Guantanamo where they were housed, clothed and fed, even provided medical care and legal representation - all at tax payer expense.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Like Antifa?

    3. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

      Rick James, it's obviously not true that "[t]he purpose of the military is to kill people and break things."

      Article VI of our Constitution emphasizes that the first, foremost and constant focus (duty) of all legislators and "all executive and judicial Officers" (state and federal) is "to support [our] Constitution." Article II emphasized that when "[t]he President" acts as "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States" everything the president does (and everything the president uses the foregoing forces to do) is subject to the president's duty (oath) to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States" to "the best of [his] Ability."

      As a consequence of the foregoing, Congress enacted a law (5 U.S.C. 3331) requiring every "individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services" to "support and defend" our "Constitution" against "all enemies, foreign and domestic" and to "bear true faith and allegiance to" our "Constitution," alone.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        Your point being what exactly? If defending the constitution, which obviously requires defending the republic, requires killing people and breaking things how is Rick wrong?

        1. DesigNate   2 months ago

          “Jack” is a consummate bloviator AND he thinks only lawyers can understand the law/constitution.

        2. Jack Jordan   2 months ago

          Gaear, that's a big "if." I didn't say nobody ever would need to kill people or break things to support the Constitution.

          Rick is wrong (obviously wrong) in his misrepresentation that "[t]he purpose of the military is to kill people and break things." That's obviously not "the purpose" of our Armed Forces. "The purpose" of our Armed Forces is, as the Constitution emphasizes, to support our Constitution. Our Armed Forces serve to do that by much more than merely killing people and breaking things.

    4. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

      That would be just phase one. Then we'll send in our forces to rebuild the nation, but don't worry Iraqi Venezuelan oil revenues will pay for the whole war and reconstruction.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        TDSs-addled lying pile of slimy shit heard from.

    5. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      The purpose of the military is to kill people and break things.

      Which is why it shouldn't be used for law enforcement.

      1. See.More   2 months ago

        Which is why it shouldn't be used for law enforcement.

        And, conversely, why law enforcement ought not be militarized.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          100%

  24. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "...judging from a story in The Washington Post..."

    Fuck off and die, asswipe.

  25. Moonrocks   2 months ago

    Minnesota officials push back on Trump after he called Gov. Tim Walz "seriously retarded" in a social media post

    Was he wrong?

  26. shrike   2 months ago

    Pete Hegseth likes killing people.

    Neo-Nazi Frat Boy is a good little Bushpig.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Simping for Maduro now, Shrike?

      1. shrike   2 months ago

        Fatass Donnie is doing the Bushpig Iraq dance. Instead of non-existent WMD it is about fentanyl boats.

        Saddam - Maduro? What's the difference?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          You really are either a dumbass, a shill, or both. Maduro’s regime has been controlling the source code found in many voting machines in the US, and manipulates them. They have been deliberately sending drugs, primarily fentanyl, into the US to disrupt society. This isn’t Saddam, retard.

          1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            Venezuela doesn't produce or traffic fentanyl.

            https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2020-03/DEA_GOV_DIR-008-20%20Fentanyl%20Flow%20in%20the%20United%20States_0.pdf

            https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/19/us/politics/trump-venezuela-fentanyl.html

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

              Then explain the fentanyl boats coming out of Venezuela.

              1. shrike   2 months ago

                There are no fentanyl boats coming out of Venezuela.

                Donnie is lying again.

                1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                  turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                  If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                  turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

              2. Zeb   2 months ago

                I thought it was cocaine. Is there evidence these boats were carrying fentanyl?

                1. shrike   2 months ago

                  Columbia, Peru, Bolivia make the good yayo.

                  I've had it. Great stuff.

                  1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                    turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                    If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                    turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

                  2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                    Explains a lot when you understand that cocaine is the asshole drug.

                2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                  https://www.newsweek.com/us-military-drug-cartels-boats-attacked-live-updates-10921551

                  1. Zeb   2 months ago

                    I see one assertion that one boat was loaded with "fentanyl and other narcotics". Not that it really matters, I was only curious. I still don't think we should be shooting missiles at drug traffickers.

                    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                      I just provided a link, no commentary.

                      Drugs have 100% been found post strikes as I showed before.

                      And these aren't just drug runners but cartel members as well.

                      I dont think the citizens of El Salvador are crying over finally going after cartels, do you?

                      Would you also complain about spending 10s of billions arresting and using courts?

                      These funds finance other crimes as well. Tired of those belief that if drugs were legalized cartels and crimes would lessen. These organizations move from one product to the next. The mob didnt stop after alcohol was legalized again.

                  2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                    The source for the claim that “U.S. Intelligence confirmed this vessel was loaded up with mostly Fentanyl, and other illegal narcotics.” was Trump and Hegseth, with no publicly available evidence given.

                    There were 2 survivors of that strike. Neither was charged with any crime.

                    I advise taking the claim with a grain of salt.

                    1. Zeb   2 months ago

                      No, no, it's obviously OK to simply trust anything attributed to "US Intelligence".

                  3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                    He asked for evidence, Mike responds with literally an assertion i never made, zeb joins in. Usually better than this zeb.

                    Literally a single link and Mike rages.

                    Whats really funny to me is even the AP went to thr families of these narco traffickers to try to dispute the claims and the family admitd they were running drugs, and Mike still pretends the evidence of fake. Wapo admits Hegseth has seal team 6 and others confirming loads and who is on boats, and meme still pretends evidence is fake.

                    Mike is a retarded leftist.

                    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Raging? Come on.

                      I'm only pointing out there is no publicly available evidence that any of those boats had fentanyl on board. Cocaine, yes, but not fentanyl. So I'm not claiming that none were trafficking drugs.

                      What drug was being traficked matters because the policy is justified by being about fentanyl, not cocaine.

                      Wapo admits Hegseth has seal team 6 and others confirming loads and who is on boats, and meme still pretends evidence is fake.

                      I haven't seen this WAPO story, but it's irrelevant if they're not sharing the evidence with us. The evidence isn't fake, it's nonexistent.

                      And that assertion is from your link.

                    2. Zeb   2 months ago

                      Geez, I was just curious if anyone actually knew what drugs were involved. Cocaine makes a lot more sense as that is what comes from South America and fentanyl is a lot less bulky and there are probably better ways to smuggle it than small boats. I don't think anyone is raging about anything. Just questioning the assertions that they were fentanyl boats. Entirely separate from the debate on whether they are valid targets for this sort of attack. Not going to engage on whether QB is Mike or if either is a retarded leftist.

                    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Is this your WAPO article?

                      The longer the U.S. surveillance aircraft followed the boat, the more confident intelligence analysts watching from command centers became that the 11 people on board were ferrying drugs. https://archive.ph/Dnq8a

                      This does not inspire confidence in their intelligence gathering.

          2. shrike   2 months ago

            Maduro’s regime has been controlling the source code found in many voting machines in the US, and manipulates them.

            Holy shit you're a gullible dumbass cracker. Those Maduro idiots can't make money on oil with the largest reserves in the hemisphere. They're incapable of hacking.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

              It’s hard to make money off it when you’re busy skimming the profits off the top line a mafia boss in a casino.

            2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

              turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
              If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
              turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

          3. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

            That's the story that's not even being recognized as a conspiracy theory right now. There are reasons to believe that Maduro along with Dominion were involved in election fraud not just in Venezuela but also in the US in 2020. It's another rabbit hole that nobody is allowed to talk about out loud. I can't prove it one way or the other but I think Trump is aware of these claims and it has a lot to do with his antipathy toward Maduro.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              There are reasons to believe that Maduro along with Dominion were involved in election fraud not just in Venezuela but also in the US in 2020.

              Yes and those reasons are "Sidney Powell" and "Rudy Giuliani".

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                Aren’t you in for a very rude awakening.

        3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

          Totally the wrong comparison.

          It's more like Manuel Noriega.

        4. DesigNate   2 months ago

          Shrike, you ignorant slut, the difference is there are actual boats leaving Venezuela and traveling at speed through international waters, so it’s nothing like W wanting to do daddy proud.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

  27. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    As the war machine keeps turning

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      TDSs-addled lying pile of shit heard from.

  28. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    "Pete Hegseth likes killing people. He's said as much repeatedly. Back in early September, he declared that the newly renamed Department of War would favor "maximum lethality, not tepid legality.""

    Imagine pearl clutching over the guy running the department overseeing the military thinking that it is best for the military to be effective at its job.

  29. mad.casual   2 months ago

    When the inaugural strike in this campaign against a boat off the Trinidadian coast left two survivors clinging to the wreckage of the craft, the commander in charge of the operation, in accordance with Hegseth's spoken directive, ordered a second strike to take them out too.

    At face value, setting aside the WaPo messenger: We're supposed to take all this on the word of someone who, under the veil of secrecy, killed two people in what he believed to be an immoral act and *then*, similarly under a veil of secrecy/anonymity, forsook his oath and leaked the information to the press?

    Again, at face value, the guy makes Ollie North look like a priest.

  30. sarcasmic   2 months ago

    Remember when the Trump administration not killing people and not starting new wars was a good thing?

    Those were the days.

    1. shrike   2 months ago

      GIVE DONNIE THE PEACE PRIZE ALREADY!

    2. shrike   2 months ago

      He ended the war in Ukraine in one week like he campaigned on.

      Didn't he?

      Then there is the Abe Accords that brought peace to the Middle East.

      Still laughing about the gullible hicks who believed that one.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        turd, the shit-stain of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      What war has he started?

      1. shrike   2 months ago

        Iran. But they didn't fight back.

        Maybe Venezuela if they fight.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          You realize he stopped an Israel-Iran war with that strike, right, saving Tehran from total destruction.

          1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            Tehran is facing destruction anyway due to the water crisis.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

              Yes, but that’s slower and manageable by the municipality. They were facing a full-fledged bombing campaign.

              1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

                manageable by the municipality

                No, it's not. They're facing a complete evacuation of Tehran.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                  Correction: should be manageable if they were competent. Your comment says they aren't competent.

    4. Super Scary   2 months ago

      What new war are we in?

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        turd, the TDS-addled shitstain of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

  31. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    If you accurately describe a person as "seriously retarded" is that actually bad?

    What if I were to refer to Greg Abbot as "totally crippled"? Is that bad?

    1. Eeyore   2 months ago

      The most serious crisis facing this nation today, "not all boys have access to free tampons". A true crisis.

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Is it because the boys' girlfriends will keep their thighs shut if the boys could not procure tampons for them?

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          You soak them in 151 and shove them up your ass for a fast buzz without drinking.

          1. Eeyore   2 months ago

            Then eat some spicy food for a truly memorable experience the next day.

          2. Zeb   2 months ago

            Butt-chugging really hasn't been getting the attention it deserves lately.

            1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

              So, if you're busted for DUI after butt-chugging, do you have to fart into the breathalyzer?

              1. Eeyore   2 months ago

                A percentage of the alcohol in your blood does evaporate from your mouth. Not sure if you blow lower or not.

                Maybe someone should volunteer to test it?

                1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                  Sarc?

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Well, it would be inaccurate, as Abbot is only partially crippled.

      I have no problem with calling Walz a retard either. But he's not actually retarded, seriously or not. He's just a lying, corrupt asshole.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        I don't think the word retard exists anymore in the medical literature like it did when I was a boy in ancient times. These days everybody, and I mean everybody, is autistic. Retard has become a colloquial term for the low IQ people that Trump oftentimes brings to our attention. Queer used to be a derogatory slur but has evolved into a badge of honor. It won't be long until retards like Tim Walz embrace the term and all of the benefits that come with it.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          For the victimhood generation, "retard" is just another merit badge.

  32. shrike   2 months ago

    Hey Peanuts, bitcoin is falling hard.

    And Microstrategy is leveraged to the hilt with bitcoin. They might blow up.

    You can buy an bear ETF on MSTR - symbol SMST.

    BUY IT NOW!

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Remember when you posted a link about fast food loss leader promotions to defend biden?

      1. shrike   2 months ago

        The McDonalds $5 meal?

        That was an inflation buster! It was for real.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          turd the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. Eeyore   2 months ago

          The $10 hamburger is the new value menu.

        3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

          You're the dumbest poster here (at least until molly posts).

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

            Very true. Molly stole Shrike’s crown a month or two back.

            1. DesigNate   2 months ago

              I don’t know, she hasn’t posted a link that refutes her MSNow talking point.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of TDS-addled lefty shit.

    3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      You still holding that Tesla short?

  33. Public Entelectual   2 months ago

    Hegseth's tattoos are his best feature, witness his idea of a Christmas card:
    https://x.com/PeteHegseth/status/1995291042346852861

  34. shrike   2 months ago

    Trump says he plans to pardon former Honduran president serving drug trafficking sentence
    World Updated on Nov 28, 2025 5:02 PM EST — Published on Nov 28, 2025 4:45 PM EST
    WEST PALM BEACH, Florida (AP) — President Donald Trump said Friday that he will be pardoning former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who in 2024 was convicted for drug trafficking and weapons charges and sentenced to 45 years in prison.

    PBS

    Fatass don't care about drug trafficking.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Where’s your link, Turd?

  35. shrike   2 months ago

    Dec 1, 2025 NBC

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has commuted the seven-year sentence of former private equity CEO David Gentile, a White House official confirmed.
    ....
    Gentile was sentenced in May to seven years in prison on wire and security fraud charges. According to the Bureau of Prisons' database, Gentile was not in its custody as of Nov. 26. The White House pardon czar, Alice Marie Johnson, also confirmed Gentile's release in a post on X.
    ...
    Gentile was the CEO and co-founder of GPB Capital Holdings and was convicted by a federal jury in August 2024 of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud and two counts of wire fraud.

    GET YER PARDON HERE BOYS!

    FINANCIAL CRIMES? DONT MATTER!

    DRUG TRAFFICING? DONT MATTER!

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Got a link to the rest of the story, Turd?

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of slimy lefty shit.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      SSDD, but I do not recall a word about it then...

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/biden-commutes-sentences-of-drug-traffickers-crack-dealers-cartel-leaders-and-fraudsters/ar-AA1vLoIL

      GET YER PARDON HERE BOYS!

      Drug traffickers, crack dealers, cartel leaders and fraudsters appear on President Joe Biden’s list of nearly 1,500 individuals who he granted clemency Thursday, court records reveal.

      DRUG TRAFFICING? DONT MATTER!

      One individual, Francesk Shkambi, was initially sentenced in July 2014 to 27 years in prison for leading a criminal organization to “smuggle cocaine and marijuana into the United States from Albania,” according to court records.

      “Shkambi also negotiated with a foreign source to traffic cocaine from Mexico to Europe,” the records show. “The jury found Shkambi responsible for trafficking 85 kilograms of cocaine, 4 kilograms of heroin, approximately 122 pounds of marijuana, and 4,000 pills of Ecstasy.”

      Shkambi was later set to be released in 2029, according to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP).

      Jose Valdez, whose sentence Biden commuted, “coordinated the distribution of large quantities of cocaine and marijuana for a drug-trafficking organization based in El Paso, Texas, from March of 2015 through July of 2016,” per court records.

      Valdez also “recruited numerous individuals to deliver narcotics to cities throughout the United States.” His scheduled release date was previously set for November 2026, according to the BOP.

      Biden also commuted Daniel Monsanto Lopez’s sentence, whose request for release to home confinement a court denied in 2020, noting he was “the organizer and leader of a sophisticated, years-long narcotics smuggling and distribution conspiracy that trafficked at least 20 kilograms of cocaine from Puerto Rico to the Bronx.”

      FINANCIAL CRIMES? DONT MATTER!

      Two of the “most notorious fraudsters” in the Chicago-area — former Dixon, Illinois Comptroller Rita Crundwell and former Sentinel Management Group, Inc. CEO Eric Bloom — also made the list, according to the Chicago Tribune.

      Crundwell, who was sentenced in 2013 to nearly 20 years in prison, stole $53.7 million from Dixon over the course of a decade in what many called the largest municipal fraud in U.S. history. Bloom was convicted for defrauding “hundreds of victims” of over $665 million.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        So you want to blame a kindly but forgetful old man that no jury would convict? Otto Penn was in charge. Otto Penn was always in charge.

        1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

          Otto "Jill" Penn

  36. JFree   2 months ago

    Even if one accepts the dubious idea that these strikes are legal, the second strike described in the Post report would violate the laws of war. More plainly, it would be murder.

    Reason supports (covers up) genocide. NOW you are getting queasy about laws of war and murder?

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      JFucked supports Nazis and lies to provide that support.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Aren’t you the guy who thought the government was the sole manufacturer of guns for 180 years?

  37. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    Wrong place.

  38. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    If it's totally okay for the military to kill foreigners in boats whom the government suspects of breaking laws (drug trafficking), then why not send the military to kill illegal immigrants? They are definitely suspected of breaking laws too, right? And they're not citizens so they don't get due process, like the guys in boats don't get due process, right?

    I mean, what's the MAGA argument against this approach? Is it purely based on optics - that it would look bad for the military to be killing a bunch of people on American soil? That Democrats would use the negative publicity for their own purposes? Is that the only MAGA reason against it?

    1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Jeffy goes reductio ad hitlerum again. *yawn*

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Why would it be any more fascist to murder illegal immigrants, than to murder suspected drug traffickers in the ocean?

        1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          What does a sea lion say?

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Oh look, the fuckhead vomited up a comment then couldn't stand behind his words. Troll.

            1. DesigNate   2 months ago

              You shouldn’t talk so badly about yourself.

    2. Nobartium   2 months ago

      Killing illegals isn't necessary to deport them (unless they intend to violently resist such efforts, then they roll the dice).

      Smuggling and piracy aren't covered under the same standard as deportation.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Using cruise missiles against smugglers isn't necessary to stop smuggling either.

        So what standard makes it okay to murder smugglers but not murder illegal immigrants?

        1. Nobartium   2 months ago

          Rapid actions demand rapid response.

          Illegal immigration is many things, but it isn't rapid.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            This is a rationalization. No smuggling boat is traveling so fast that it can't be intercepted by non-lethal means.

            Why are you just so eager to see them dead? What is wrong with putting them on trial and imprisoning them, if they are guilty of the crimes that you think that they are?

    3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Are you deliberately trying to make bad arguments and terrible analogies?

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        That's his job.

      2. DesigNate   2 months ago

        It’s what he’s best at.

  39. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    The paper reports alleges that Hegseth issued verbal orders to the military forces striking suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean and Pacific to "kill everybody."

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      They used an anonymous source! They've never been wrong!

      1. See.More   2 months ago

        [deleted]

  40. Roberta   2 months ago

    ...

    An order to kill boat occupants no longer able to fight "would in essence be an order to show no quarter, which would be a war crime,"

    If you're going to commit crimes, isn't it advisable to leave no witnesses alive? Or are mystery writers stupid?

    1. Lester75   2 months ago

      Drug smuggling is not typically punishable by death. These boats aren't even manned by big-wigs in a possible drug smuggling operation. These are the grunts/low men on the total pole.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Skynet sees all and AI writes history. Mystery writers will have to adapt to the brave new world.

  41. Ben of Houston   2 months ago

    Is there any evidence that this is what happened? Actual orders are given in writing, in detail, and are explicitly handed down through chains of command. Cabinet secretaries don't give direct commands to captains much less stand on the bridge directing fire.

    This is reacting to a rhetorical statement that we cannot verify even happened like it was an explicit order for a massacre.

    If there was such an order, there would be a paper trail a mile long with dozens or hundreds of people willfully ignoring their duties to enact it. I don't believe that it happened. At least not without a lot more proof than this rumor mill.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Lawmakers in Texas and Ohio Consider Abolishing Property Taxes

Christian Britschgi | From the February/March 2026 issue

The Supreme Court Is Poised To Remind States That the Constitution Doesn't Stop at the Liquor Store

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 2.7.2026 7:00 AM

Archives: February-March 2026

Reason Staff | From the February/March 2026 issue

Most Americans Hate Trump's Tariffs

Jack Nicastro | 2.6.2026 4:54 PM

The Trump Administration Is Taking Credit for a Long-Running Murder Decline

Alexandra Stinson | 2.6.2026 3:48 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks