Mamdani Understands Something About Trump That European Leaders Don't
Trump respects outreach from opponents more than submissive flattery from friends.
The spectacle of last week was the meeting between President Donald Trump and New York Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, two politicians been going after each other for months. Trump, who had called Mamdani a "communist lunatic" during the mayoral election, now declared Mamdani "a very rational person." When journalists asked Mamdani about his past attacks on Trump's "fascist agenda," the president beamed, patted Mamdani, and added, "That's OK. You can just say it."
In some ways, the encounter resembled Trump's meeting with the new Syrian president, Ahmad al-Sharaa, in May 2025. "Young, attractive guy. Tough guy. Strong past. Very strong past. Fighter," Trump said of al-Sharaa, former head of Al Qaeda in Syria. It was also a throwback to Trump's first-term outreach to North Korea. After threatening the country with "fire and fury," he had a series of meetings with its leader, Kim Jong Un, whom Trump came to praise as a "very honorable" negotiating partner.
Other leaders often take Trump as a sucker for flattery. Since he's apparently willing to bury the hatchet with a few kind words, the thinking goes, those words must be the secret to appeasing him. It rarely works, because Trump is good at smelling weakness. But he respects strength. Trump accepts outreach from former enemies—domestic opponents or foreign warlords—because he enjoys the feeling that he has tamed a dangerous beast.
With Trump, "flattery is ultimately counter-productive. In the short term, it avoids a public clash and may even help limit punishment in the form of tariffs or public criticism. In the longer term, far from buying respect, it earns his disdain and encourages the assumption that allies will cave on policy," former Biden administration official Philip Gordon wrote in the Financial Times last week.
Perhaps nothing has illustrated this principle better than Trump's relationship with Europe. In a bid to keep American military aid to Ukraine flowing, European leaders have practiced their best flattery skills. In June 2025, North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary General Mark Rutte creepily called Trump "Daddy." In August 2025, a group of European leaders crowded around Trump's desk while he reclined in his chair, like supplicants before a king.

Humiliation begets humiliation. Over and over again, Trump has insulted Europe and made it clear that negotiations for the future of Ukraine will happen over the Europeans' heads. He has demanded a cut from Ukraine's natural resources and pushed the European Union to take a lopsided trade deal that puts tariffs on European products while exempting American ones.
Other allies have tried, and failed with, the same approach. Asian leaders showered Trump with praise and gifts during his last visit to the region. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi promised to nominate him for the Nobel Peace Prize, and South Korean President Lee Jang Myung gave Trump a literal golden crown. That didn't stop Trump from tariffing Japan into an economic contraction and extracting a $350 billion ransom from South Korea to avoid the same fate.
Contrast that with Mexico and Canada, two small countries in America's shadow. Early in his second term, Trump announced blanket tariffs against both of them. He accused Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum of allying with gangsters and even threatened to annex Canada. Rather than trying to appease the U.S. president, Mexico and Canada immediately hit back with tariffs of their own. Ontario, the province of Canada with the most to lose, struck a daredevil tone.
"If they want to try to annihilate Ontario, I will do anything, including cutting off their energy—with a smile on my face," Ontario Premier Doug Ford said at a press conference. "They need to feel the pain."
Trump ended up softening and delaying the tariff increases on Mexico and Canada. Just this weekend, he blew through a self-imposed deadline to tariff Canada, which Trump had announced in retaliation for Ford taking out an anti-tariff ad. And he hasn't followed through on his threats to expand the drug war by bombing Mexico. Sheinbaum, a left-wing leader who has declared that Mexicans will "never bow our heads" to America, enjoys a strangely warm relationship with Trump.
"You're tough," Trump told Sheinbaum during a private March 2025 phone call, adding in public that he would suspend tariffs "out of respect" for his "very good" relationship with Sheinbaum.
Mamdani, who has threatened to block Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, clearly benefited from the same respect for strength. Despite the huge leverage that the federal government holds over New York City, the mayor-elect came out swinging. He promised in his victory speech to be "Trump's worst nightmare" and "show a nation betrayed by Donald Trump how to defeat him."
It looked a lot more serious than Trump's other domestic opposition. At the beginning of the second Trump administration, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D–N.Y.) had whimpered, "It's their government. What leverage do we have?" The same week that Mamdani was readying his followers for confrontation, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) was surrendering to Republicans on the government shutdown while begging them to see the light of reason. So it shouldn't be much of a surprise that Trump treated Mamdani as an equal and heaped contempt on Schumer.
Of course, personal respect from Trump is not enough to totally derail a hostile agenda. Mexico and Canada still suffered from some tariff increases. And the risk of bluster is having to back it up. Mamdani and Trump still have substantive, zero-sum disagreements that will force them to fight.
But even if resistance has its downsides, grovelling clearly does not work. European and Asian leaders have thrown away a strong hand by preemptively signalling their intent to surrender. Mexico and Canada's leaders avoided the worst outcome by playing a weak hand with strength. In a palace full of sycophants, the way to win the king's respect is with defiance.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
NYC is beholden to what the federal govt does where Mamdani won’t have the ability to appreciably impact the DJT agenda. Maybe he defunds the police and federal law enforcement gets sent there to prevent anarcho tyranny. NYC did recently have that illegal alien rape a corpse on a subway.
No anarchy in NYC. Lower violent crime rate than lost other US cities. And the subways are about the safest places in the city.
Since 2019, felony assaults in the subway have risen more than 53%, from 374 incidents in 2019 to 573 in 2024 .
I see you've attended the DNC school of leftist narratives.
See, not that much. Only a couple of times a day. Everyday.
I'm already used to felony subway assaults!
I’m told that corpse raping, stabbings and arson of a person (with accelerants!) are trivial culture war issues.
I learned that here.
You can just call it Bluesky.
Much higher violent crime rates than here. And no corpses being raped on public transportation here.
The NYC subway:
Another crazy day on the NYC subway.
A group of high school girls were laughing at something of their own. The man thought they were laughing at him and started yelling and cursing at the students. The teacher stepped in and told him not to speak to the kids that way.
The man then turned toward her, spit in her face, and when she went to grab her pepper spray, he pulled out a huge kitchen knife.
https://t.me/leaklive/29318
What a fucking disaster. Those team D residents likely get used to it and defend the place as being “safe.”
Hear that subway surfing is popular there. Up to five deaths this year?
We need more Daniel Pennys and Bernard Goetz.
Calling Paul kersey...
We need fewer Nazi shits around here.
""And the subways are about the safest places in the city.""
Not really. But why might you say that? The subway is relatively safe now. Why?
Crime is not that bad on the subway because the gov did not ignore it or make excuses for it when it was getting bad. She sent in the national guard and state police. She pulled a state version of Trump.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/06/hochul-sends-national-guard-to-new-york-city-subways-to-combat-crime-.html?msockid=10a4843f60fb697f343292766174681b
https://gothamist.com/news/hochul-says-nyc-subways-are-safer-then-sends-in-250-more-national-guard-troops
Also, the city put more cops on the platforms and in the trains.
For you own example, adding additional law enforcement and military worked to reduce crime.
In a country filled with defeated, backward, impotent right-wing residue, there is no such thing as no police presence. Not in schools, not on subways, not at public events. Not even at church.
They call that "freedom" around there. Haha, fucking clowns.
Yeah, thanks for backing prosecutors who want to empty prisons. Libertarianism works GREAT in anarchy.
"...Lower violent crime rate than lost other US cities..."
Cite missing, lying pile of lefty shit.
NY'er here. Violent crime victims on subways often do not bother to report their assaults, as it will tie up most of a day with useless interviews, rides to the station, etc. And even if the perp is caught, it is a certainty that the miscreant will be quickly released and given a meaningless court date.
Yeah...right:
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/never-had-these-problems-violent-illegal-street-takeover-rocks-queens-neighborhood
It was the Jews, right Nazi shitbag?
It's all relative. NYC is a hell of a lot safer than St. Louis or Memphis. We visit often and go everywhere by subway. If you're not stupid and avoid late night rides to bad neighborhoods, it's quite safe. Any city is unsafe in bad neighborhoods late at night. In fact many rural areas are unsafe late at night. Look up Gallup, New Mexico, Kennett, Missouri, Humboldt, Tennessee or Pahokee, Florida.
And what do all of the "bad neighborhoods" have in common?
You might get blue in the face if you insist on always reminding them.
IDK. The most violent counties per capita in Idaho are: Fremont, Lemhi, Custer, and Idaho. What do they have in common?
Tell you what: Get an apartment in downtown Boise for a year and then get an apartment in East New York in Brooklyn the following year. Compare notes and report back to me in two years if you're still alive. If you have to beg and plead at any point to save your life, that doesn't count - you have to conduct yourself in East New York the same as you did in Boise. That includes shopping, having dinner at restaurants and going out to nightclubs in your neighborhood within easy walking distance.
People who live in Boise are more likely to need to move to those four counties and vice versa. Americans no longer move much from state to state - the lowest mobility rates ever.
If they ever do move back and forth from Boise to Brooklyn, they are likely a fuckload younger than you since you seem to have an inordinate fear that people who live in Brooklyn are petrified of leaving their bathroom. I doubt that's true but hey thank God you are alive to yell at the Interwebs. To make life better for those who live in Brooklyn. That is your goal isn't it?
Wow, good job of completely missing the point. Or are you being deliberately obtuse because you have no answer for my suggestion?
And by the way, I wasn't impugning the entire borough of Brooklyn, just one really nasty section of it. I know my New York, having lived there for over 20 years, and there are actually very livable parts of Brooklyn, like Park Slope and Williamsburg. However, you seem to have a penchant for talking about things of which you have zero knowledge (other than a basic ability to surf the Interwebs using Googal Plex).
So basically, democrat cities are violent shitholes, right?
Yes. Apparently, you get used to it.
You forgot Chicago:
year to date:
shot and killed: 337
Shot and wounded: 1483
Total shot: 1820
Total homicides: 401
Stats courtesy Hey Jackass/ Illustrating Chicago values. And mayor Brandon Jogger wants to eliminate the police and create a lawless anarchy.
But we didn't forget your antisemitic whines, asshole.
"Trump respects outreach from opponents more than submissive flattery from friends."
Is that not true of most people?
Two socialist walk into a bar. One yells at the bartender, "Drinks are on you".
If a socialist is involved, the drink can also end up on a law enforcement officer.
https://t.me/leaklive/29866
Law enforcement is socialist.
Not at all. The lack of it is anarchy. The promotion of selective law enforcement is anarcho tyranny.
Nope, but you are, and we will need far less law enforcement when you democrats are gone.
Right. Explain why socialists are going out of their way to defund the police.
Law enforcement be all rayciss and sheit!
And favored by the Jew?
I saw someone defending the democrat socialists claiming that they focus on democracy. I'm thinking whatever dude, put any word you want in front of it, you are still going to run out of other people's money.
ALL money is other people's money unless you have a money tree or a printing press.
Trump probably laughs at his clueless Cult members commenting here.
But everyone laughs at you.
No, but you’re a retarded propagandist pinko.
Excellent article
He promised in his victory speech to be "Trump's worst nightmare" and "show a nation betrayed by Donald Trump how to defeat him."
And then revealed through his body language in the Oval Office that he was a paper tiger.
Mamdani's socialist policies will, if implemented as presented, will range from somewhat damaging to seriously destructive. I am positive that this meeting with Trump resulted in zero change to what Mamdani plans to do, since Trump doesn't understand the difference between the various economic approaches to society at all. Mamdani is clearly smarter than Trump, and he will be able to keep Trump off of his back, at least to some extent. What he does to NY will be what they voted for, and if I'm right, they will pay the price. This really doesn't bother me.
Just remember, the people of that city voted for it, therefore one has no reason to offer up any sympathy.
Just remember, John Z has his S/S uniform handy!
Sure. Hold on to that hope of yours.
Mamdani is a fucking moron. NYC deserves its fate.
This is game theory 101, tit for tat. The surprise isn’t that it so clearly works, the surprise is that otherwise skilled political leaders who should know when to cooperate and when to defect failed so completely.
Mamdani should be stopped by whatever means necessary. Charge him with violations of immigration and election laws, arrest him and drop him off at Alligator Alcatraz. A nice warm place this time of year.
Otherwise expect New York city to resemble the 1981 movie, Escape From New York.
Paging Snake Plissken.......
Whatever happens and it won't be good, I will harbor no sympathy what so ever for the people of that city.
They voted for it.
Would the other Nazis back your proposals, Herr Schickelgruber?
One of the better articles on Reason which typically has the likes of Nick Gillespie and his idiotic unhinged hatred.
Truth is that Trump is neither Hitler nor Mother Theresa, he is just another mediocre with some strengths and weaknesses and a different delivery than other recent presidents.
Obama was another mediocre president and likewise was not a demon nor saint. Nick Gillespie may like Obama's plastic style of delivering daggers into the backs of the citizens of the country. Then there is a nearly 100% lack of transparency of the Obama regime.
I know that Nick Gillespie despises Trumps style of exposing the hidden motives through a brash, very direct and authentic style. Trump doesn't do lack of transparency very well and when he attempts it, the Trump regime usually botches it badly.
Neither Obama or Trump are/were great presidents, although it is doubtful that any president was great while they were in office. It usually takes decades for propaganda to minimize the negative and maximize the positive to take hold.
There are however some presidents that immediately fall into the realm of being a bad president. Most notably Biden. Nick Gillespie may desire to put Trump into the Bad column and probably hates Trump so intensely that he falsely believes that Trump is far worse that any other president by miles and miles, but Nick Gillespie is flat out wrong.
Trump has been branded by the corporate media as being the reincarnation of Hitler. It likely do the fact that Trump was once a democrat. For the last few decades I've noticed a pattern where the most reviled people are prominent people who were previously democrats that left the democrat party.
They are viewed as traitors and must be taken out at all costs. The reality is that these people largely have the same views they held when they were democrats, but have come to the realization that the democrat party has shifted to such a degree that they are no longer aligned.
Trump had the audacity to run against Hillary Clinton machine which was already miffed that she was denied by the young upstart Obama. When the country rejected Hillary Clinton once again and Trump was elected, the left went apoplectic.
A branded democrat traitor had bested the heir-apparent. From there they did everything possible to thwart Trump, not because of principled positions, but because they believe that it was a personal slight and an affront to their leftist bubble.
The left has manifested much of what they hate. Trump does have a tendency to Troll the left which typically exposes them due to their reactions. Actually quite hilarious at times. Trump dictates their positions because they are so rabid and devoid of logic that they take predictable stances usually 180 degrees in opposition.
The difference between the past 4 presidents and their predecessors is their avowed sense, or "sentiment" of Zionism... call it mediocre if you want... what I know for certainty is most americans have lost their citizenship since 9-11 and they are not even aware of it. Do you believe it's true all presidents of recent history rush to Israel after their first term election to pick up their Israel passport?
*yawn*.
Sure Adolf.
Zionism is no one's friend.
I'm not sure you really got the core "rapprochement" right between these to socialists, one being a Nazi and the other an apparent commie.
Interestingly, Zohran is so chauvinist about being a Muslim that most people don't pick up he is maintaining the long tradition of elected Jewish mayors. Yes, he is from India, and a practicing Muslim, but practicing Islam doesn't prevent someone from being genetically Jewish, with the inevitable unique embedded sense of identity. Just look at last week's visit of Prince Al Saud from Saudi Arabia. His extended royal family all practice Islam yet are Jewish. What happened since 9-11 in the Arabic Peninsula is Leaders of most Islamic States who were also Jewish supported and traditionally supported the Palestininan cause; but now they are mostly all Zionist Muslims... This is what has changed.
There is an interesting chapter in the book Divide and Conquer - chapter "2. The Lost Tribes" which will give you a glimpse at how many people from Kashmir to Brahmans view themselves view themselves as Lost tribes of Israel. (Reason doesn't like Hyperlinks so I'll put the name ardoabchao dot ca, look for Divide and Conquer)
Around Trump's cabinet this term they are no black persons but 5 Hindus who all happen to be Brahmans...coincidence? Can you smell the Zionism already?
Remember how in his first term Trump openly expressed a complete disdain for Palestinians.
Now you can also read on the following blog (on: Jacobin dot com, Why far-right Hindus Love Demonizing Palestinians). In fact most Brahmans and "Lost tribes of Israel" in India blame Palestinians, descendants of Assyrians, for chasing the Lost tribes out of Judea. Old Rifts die hard in the Peninsula... Yes, Modi's extreme right party have turned India's Political leadership completely Zionist, like Trump.
So, out of being 2 Transmen, the principle characteristic which units Trump and Zohran is probably their Zionism and their deep hate of Non-Jewish Palestinians (Jewish Palestinians are called Mizrahi Jews and form the core of Hamas and have also, in recent years turned completely Zionist.)
Not being Jewish I personally find Anti-Semitism a lot more sexy than Zionism.
PS: If it can reassure you you can quickly browse the web and Read Rabbis writings which will describe Brahmans as Lost Tribe of Israel. Put the word Noah, they will show the similarities between the 2 tales in their respective sacred scriptures and explain the not per chance similarity between the Name Abraham and Brahmin (Al-Brahmin) in the original ancient pronunciations.
"between these to socialists"
I ASSUME this is the best English you can type.
Pity. Who'll READ it? HOW?
"two politicians been going after each other"
Besbol been bery good for me?