Trump's Venezuela Escalation Could Destroy MAGA, Warns Rand Paul
Blowing up boats won’t stop drugs—but it could sink Trump.
Since September, President Donald Trump has ordered 21 strikes on boats in the Caribbean and Pacific oceans, killing 83 people. He says the boats were carrying dangerous narcotics to the United States (a claim that has been disproved). Now, the president appears to be ramping up his military escalation against Venezuela's socialist regime, which, like the drug boat strikes, he's doing without congressional authorization. Republicans in Congress have thus far been silent about Trump's use of force, except for Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.), who delivered a fiery rebuke of the president's strikes on the Senate floor last month.
During a recent interview with Reason's Nick Gillespie, Paul pointed out that "when the coast guard boards vessels off of Miami or off of San Diego, one in four vessels they board does not have drugs on board, so their error rate is about 25 percent." The moral and strategic implications of this hit rate are enormous; if the president can incinerate unknown civilians at sea without evidence of wrongdoing, due process, or congressional approval, what's to stop the president from using the military to sanction other murders abroad under the guise of national security?
These strikes, as well as Trump's other actions against Venezuela and involvement in the Ukraine war, also have political implications, according to Paul. "If he invades Venezuela, or if he approves significant arms sales, which are really gifts to Ukraine, or more welfare to Ukraine, if he does either of those, the rift with Marjorie Green will pale in comparison to what happens to his movement," Paul said. "If he invades Venezuela or gives more money to Ukraine, his movement will dissolve."
Sen. @RandPaul has a foreign policy warning for Donald Trump: "If he invades Venezuela or gives more money to Ukraine, his movement will dissolve," he says on The Reason Interview podcast with @nickgillespie. pic.twitter.com/QwqEi17wtL
— reason (@reason) November 20, 2025
Trump's MAGA base has been in flux in recent weeks. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R–Ga.), who was once one of the president's strongest supporters, has become one of his loudest critics. In October, she came out against Trump's immigration and trade policies and has since been a regular thorn in the side of the administration. Her antics have led Trump to pull his support from her reelection campaign. Sen. Ted Cruz (R–Texas), meanwhile, has begun to lay the groundwork for a 2028 presidential run by distancing himself from Trump-aligned firebrands like Tucker Carlson and Vice President J.D. Vance.
These defections serve as a vivid example of how fractured the MAGA coalition has become. With many of its core voters despising neoconservative foreign policy and believing Trump's 2016 message that America should stop policing the world, a U.S. conflict in Venezuela would make the already-bad MAGA blowup even worse. It would also combine all the worst elements of past failures: shaky intelligence, freelance presidential action, and a war of choice with no clear American interest.
Paul's warning is blunt: a Venezuela intervention wouldn't just be disastrous abroad—it could politically detonate the MAGA movement itself. For a president who ran on ending "the forever wars," starting a new one remains the fastest way to break the coalition that got him elected.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
No drug should be illegal. End the war on drugs and end all govt funding of welfare, education, health insurance, and supplemental food. If junkies want their lives jenky, let them be but leave the taxpayer out of it.
Arrest rhe violent criminal jenkys and allow for self defense and I agree. Also no welfare to the jenky.
You must have a newsletter. Are all your pithy insights in front of a paywall or behind it?
It is on X: @JFreeHatesTheJews88
I'll tell you what. We can wait, say, a month. If MAGA is, by that time, destroyed, we can pay attention to Rand Paul. If it isn't, we never listen to him again, and we can have a Volokh post saying "Trump's Venezuela escalation didn't destroy MAGA after all!"
It's easy to exaggerate the effect of things if you face no backlash for ever getting it wrong. So every policy disagreement turns into a prediction of doom.
Also, notice that this prediction of doom also applies to Ukraine. But Volokh won't put up a headline reading "Trump giving Ukraine weapons could destroy MAGA, warns Rand Paul", and there's a reason for that--giving weapons to Ukraine isn't very controversial and that would be equally bad as a prediction, but a lot worse in terms of making libertarians look foolish.
Killing drug runners is not libertarian. Neither is giving taxpayer funded materiel to any other nation much less a bandera dictator. But also, don’t think many are claiming that MAGA is libertarian.
"don’t think many are claiming that MAGA is libertarian"
More libertarian than Reason, but that's a very low bar.
Free America’s Growing Libertarianism, on the other hand, does dovetail with being libertarian.
FAGL?
They sometimes turn the other cheek.
Latest polling shows 60% of Americans support drug dealing fish bait.
Umm...Cruz distancing from Tucker has nothing to do with MAGA, in fact the opposite. It has to do with Tucker's criticism of Israel. And Trump being the greatest friend to Israel...yeah not buying the Cruz distancing from MAGA. If anything Tucker is distancing himself from MAGA (MAGA just being a stand in Trump's policies).
Not sure about the distancing from Vance part, other then well the two would presumably be running against each other, so distancing oneself from one's opponent just makes sense.
Paul 2028, though! One can dream.
"If anything Tucker is distancing himself from MAGA"
Do you even Reason narratives, SaGN? Do you not understand orangemanbad?
I'm old enough to remember when Reason was shitting it's drawers over Trump insulting North Korea, and warning about WW3 with Iran.
But shooting narcotraficantes running coke and meth to the US out of the water, that will destroy MAGA this time.
Some of the editors wishcast as much as the Soros apologist commenters.
Reason -
MAGA - Collection of people who share all the same ideas, violent, wear red hats, worship Trump, racist, and Nazi adjacent.
Antifa - doesn't exist.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/5-plead-guilty-to-terrorism-related-charges-tied-to-antifa-after-texas-shooting
I said Reason, not Texas.
"what's to stop the president from using the military to sanction other murders abroad under the guise of national security?"
There is NOTHING to stop any President from using the military sanction. Nothing stopped Biden from killing innocent people in Afghanistan in 2021 because of faulty intellegince (both military and personal) or numerous other examples.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58604655
Tiresome in 2017, more so now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcmJwmvnMkY
For a president who ran on ending "the forever wars," starting a new one remains the fastest way to break the coalition that got him elected.
Maybe. Maybe not. Can he sell the idea - beyond his dingleberry worshippers here - that he alone prevented control of VZ oil from going to Islamists and commies?
Post the list of the worshippers!