Review: The Smithsonian's 'Futures in Space' Exhibit Is Surprisingly Backward-Looking
We're living in the future already. Why not focus on that instead?
The jewel of the new "Futures in Space" exhibit at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., is a Blue Origin New Shepard crew capsule. Visitors who come to the museum to be in the presence of objects that have touched the heavens may be disappointed when they learn that the capsule is merely a model. There's a certain poetry, though, to the fact that Blue Origin has promised to hand over the real thing—just as soon as they're done using it.
The exhibit leans oddly heavily on nostalgic artifacts, such as a life-sized R2-D2 and random video game swag. After all, thanks to a new golden age of commercial space flight, we're living in the future already. Why not focus on that instead?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Perhaps Space X’s Elon Musk can win Reason magazine in a game of backgammon against Charles Koch. The futures of a former libertarian magazine would look brighter than its current existence of pushing team blue narratives through a false libertine lens.
"Why doesn't a museum and research center
notably set up by private grant and overtaken by government fundinghave last year's iPhone, the historic one that went to space with Katy Perry, in it yet?" - ReasonWhy not focus on that instead?
Museum
Is it possible to be an editor in chief and possess less knowledge about words than KMW?
Repeal the 19th.
She is a very shallow thinker and not a serious news or political analyst. It truly is baffling that she holds her position.
A museum is supposed to have artifacts that don’t yet exist?
I guess?
Then... now... why is everything always a binary with you bigots?
They should get the teleprters from the fly!
OH wait that's 1950s technology.
https://airandspace.si.edu/explore/stories/afrofuturism
https://i.giphy.com/glmRyiSI3v5E4.webp
So.... Wakanda Forever, I guess? That's literally how they're advertising it.
How do we even do satire anymore when reality is so ridiculous?
Yes, there are science fiction movies made in Africa by Africans. You might find them interesting. My impression is that they are more positive and generally avoid the dystopian character of sci-fi coming out of Hollywood.
There are science fiction men who believe that calling themselves a woman makes them a woman. In reframing and reimaging reality through a transgender lens blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.
You need an open mind to appreciate fiction, science or otherwise. They call it suspension of disbelief. Give it a try and let me know how you feel. And have you tried Tolkien again? I remember you were shocked to learn that he addressed environmental concerns in his work. A re-reading (or just reading for the first time) would clear things for you.
We're talking about putting fiction in a science museum, ding dong.
it centers African and African American contributions to the advancement of science, technology, and culture and is often explored through music, art, and literature.
We're advancing science because we imagined a fictional city in comic books! This has in no way actually contributed to science, technology, and culture - it's literally just all made up stuff - but it sure made black people feel pretty good!
Derp.
Where's the exhibit on Logan's Run?
And have you tried Tolkien again? I remember you were shocked to learn that he addressed environmental concerns in his work.
You're probably thinking of the wrong person.
And I've never objected to the environmentalist interpretation of LOTR - remember, at the end of the day, LOTR is fundamentally about religion (specifically, Catholicism). And Catholics (and Conservatives) are not anti-environment. Now, I could explain to you how the Catholic morality symbolism is represented by the various environments of LOTR - but that's not the point (and maybe YOU should be the one re-reading).
The point is: Catholics - and Conservatives in general - aren't anti-environmentalism. They're anti-stupid panicky doomsaying environmentalism. Catholics/Conservatives respect living peacefully, quietly, reverently, and without excessive ambitions (Shire), while rejecting spiritually self-destructive tendencies that seek greed and power (Isengard), that ultimately result in blight, disease, and death (Mordor). But even the Hobbits burn fuel, convert woodland to living space, and cultivate the land for frankly capitalist purposes.
What they reject - what Tolkein rejected, what Catholicism/Conservatism rejects - is the excesses of man that lead men down dark paths. Remember: LOTR is about morality. Not about politics and pet causes.
I'm not interested in discussing the museum. I found the rise of 'Afrofuturism' interesting and worth commenting on.
You may find this link interesting.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/ten-inventions-inspired-by-science-fiction-128080674/
I think "Tory Anarchist" is the best label for Tolkien's political stance. That's how he described himself.
science fiction
Even then it is an insult to science fiction.
There's a pretty solid case that it's something closer to "extra-low fantasy".
High Fantasy - "Magic" (magic, unexplained phenomenon, artifacts, etc.) exists, reality is broadly different than our own because of it - Dune, LOTR, The Chronicles of Narnia
Low Fantasy - "Magic" exists as part of our reality, but is largely hidden from, separate from, or subordinate to our own reality - Arthurian Legend, Harry Potter, The Lightning Thief
Low Low Fantasy - "Magic" exists as part of our reality but is rare and/or largely inconsequential - The Metamorphosis, The Indian in The Cupboard, Flowers For Algernon
...[Transgender Fantasy here]
Even crappy fanfic and wish fulfillment crap spun off from Star Wars or Star Trek or similar is arguably more imaginative and creative; even if only because it borrows from existing work.
Personally, I include in science fiction faster than light travel, time travel, both forward and backward, switching consciousness between different individuals, alien beings who live in the surface of stars, shrinking people to tiny versions of themselves, and yes, changing sex, gender, and other body chemistry.
Fantasy is anything prominently featuring swords or set in caves.