Jeffrey Epstein: Trump 'Spent Hours At My House' With Victim
Congressional investigators released emails from the late sex trafficker discussing how to leverage his relationship with the future president.
The case of Jeffrey Epstein just won't go away, much to President Donald Trump's chagrin. "For years, it's Epstein, over and over again," Trump complained in a July 2025 social media rant, calling the deceased pedophile "a guy who never dies." And indeed, the more information comes out through congressional investigations and journalistic leaks, the worse it looks for Trump.
On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee released three emails from Epstein's inbox discussing Trump. In 2011, Epstein wrote to his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, that a victim "spent hours at my house with" Trump. (White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt named the victim as the late Virginia Giuffre in a statement denouncing the email release.) In 2019, Epstein wrote to journalist Michael Wolff that Trump "asked me to resign," apparently from Trump's club, Mar-a-Lago. "[O]f course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop," Epstein added.
Maxwell told administration lawyers in an August 2025 jailhouse interview that she "never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way" and that Trump "was a gentleman in all respects." She plans to apply for Trump to commute her sentence.
The third email is a back-and-forth conversation between Epstein and Wolff from 2015, discussing then-candidate Trump's upcoming interview with CNN. Wolff told Epstein that Trump was going to be asked about their relationship, and Epstein asked Wolff to "craft an answer" for Trump. Wolff suggested that letting Trump deny their relationship in public would give Epstein leverage.
"If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt." CNN didn't end up asking Trump the question, according to The New York Times.
The emails don't implicate Trump directly in any sexual abuse, and the 2019 message about Maxwell actually backs up Trump's claim that he kicked Epstein out of his club for poaching employees. But the emails do suggest that Trump knew a lot more about Epstein than he let on—and that he has something to hide about their relationship.
In September 2025, the House Oversight Committee released a sexually suggestive letter from Trump to Epstein talking about their "wonderful secret." It was part of a 2003 birthday book full of letters to Epstein, including a note from former President Bill Clinton, a close Epstein associate.
And it isn't just American politicians who are facing questions about their relationship with Epstein. In August 2025, Reason reported on a trove of leaked emails between Epstein and his business partner, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
The emails revealed that Epstein had been in contact with Britain's former Prince Andrew much longer than acknowledged—the prince was stripped of his titles last month over the scandal—and that Epstein and Barak had been trying to get into the surveillance business in America, Russia, and Israel together.
Building on those email leaks and the House Oversight Committee documents, Drop Site News revealed last month that Barak used Epstein's business ties for secret diplomatic talks with Russia about the future of Syria, as well as other international ventures. On Tuesday, Drop Site News reported that Barak's chief of staff had stayed at Epstein's apartment for weeks at a time.
Epstein was arrested for sexually exploiting minors in 2006 and given a plea deal that allowed him to spend only a year in jail. After victim lawsuits and press coverage started to mount, authorities reopened the sex trafficking case against Epstein in 2019. He died in custody a month later. At the time, it looked like the case would die with him; Epstein's name was transformed into a conspiracy theorist punchline.
But during the 2024 campaign, Trump offhandedly agreed to open up the government's files on Epstein, a campaign promise he would come to regret. In February 2025, the department announced that it was releasing "The Epstein Files: Phase 1," only to publish a set of already public documents. Shortly after, the Department of Justice informed Trump that his name appeared several times in Epstein's case file, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The Department of Justice then declared that there was actually nothing more to see in July 2025. "You got a lot of people that could be mentioned in those files that don't deserve to be," Trump told reporters in August 2025, insisting that he is "in support of keeping it totally open" anyways.
Democrats had been reluctant to push too hard on Trump's relationship with Epstein during the 2016 and 2020 elections, perhaps because some of them also had ties to Epstein. In fact, two Democratic candidates in 2020 attacked Trump for entertaining "conspiracy theories" about Epstein.
After Trump made it clear that he didn't want the files opened, however, Democrats seized on the Epstein case. The House Oversight Committee demanded documents from the Department of Justice and Epstein's estate, including the birthday book, whose existence was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Meanwhile, Reps. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D–Calif.) have been pushing—against the will of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.)—for a full release of the Department of Justice files on Epstein. Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D–Ariz.) says that she will sign Massie and Khanna's discharge petition after being sworn in on Wednesday afternoon, forcing a vote next month.
Johnson has tried to use the House Oversight Committee investigation to preempt Massie and Khanna's proposal. "The bipartisan House oversight committee is already accomplishing what the discharge petition, that gambit, sought, and much more," Johnson told reporters last month.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
So the Oversight Dems release a redacted version of a set of previously released unredacted emails, and call it new, and make some vague allegations. And the media just repeats it uncritically.
Meanwhile, other people have actually spent some time looking into it, and have found the entire thing to be baseless:
https://notthebee.com/article/media-says-trump-knew-about-underage-girls-and-epstein-forget-to-mention-important-detail
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1988644936707977703
TRUMP IS INNOCENT!! HE'S THE EARTHLY REINCARNATION OF JESUS!!! LEAVE DONALD ALONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Special Ed, that was…special.
Pretty telling Special Ed assumes anyone that isn’t a pedo is like Jesus.
Jeffsarc like to occasionally toss out the “either/or” exaggeration as well.
Keeping the moniker Special i see.
People that like Special Ed’s (SpEd’s) posts are known as Spedophiles.
The Akita came up with that one too.
Not only a redacted version, but one they redacted to remove Guiffre'sname who already testified trump was never involved.
Like pEestain she committed Trumpicide…so sadz. 🙁
grading as a troll attempt i give this a D-
Like Kimmel's "Unnecessary Censorship," Democrats redacted Giuffre's name. Like Maxwell, Giuffre cleared Trump of involvement. But Giuffre was the daughter of Mar-a-lago maintenance man Sky Roberts, Sr, who recommended her for a job. So they had a foundation for innocent chit-chat.
But it's possible that Epstein feared that Giuffre had spilled the beans to Trump about her abuse.
This plot looks stolen from "The Money Pit," where Tom Hanks buys a used house from the widow of Hitler's pool man--the poor sap hunted by Israeli agents. What won't trumpanzee MAGAts stoop to to cover up for God's Own Pederasts?
The whole thing is stupid. Apparently the only thing that was learned from the 20,000 email release was the Epstein was obsessed with Trump since he got thrown out of Mar A Lago. That and not only was the so called mysterious "victim" already known, she testified under oath that Trump didn't do anything at any time. Also, Epstein kept texting a Democrat on a committee that was interviewing Trump people to try and influence questioning.
If the Dems wanted this stuff released so badly why weren't they in hysterics about it during the Biden Administration?
If the DoJ had evidence of Trump acting like that New Hampshire tranny Democratic Party thing with a child, Biden would have used that to prosecute him over it.
The shutdown didn't go their way, so they needed to drop a distraction.
Why do you think Biden ran for reelection?? Because he had dirt on Trump!! Klain withheld it from Kamala out of spite!
And while he was with Jeff he colluded with Russians to rape a woman in a department store while he was making a pee tape and killing Venezuelan fishermen!
At this point I suspect we're about 6 mos. from previously undiscovered footage showing that Trump killed Epstein.
Probably some sort of quantum delocalization somehow associated with seizing control of The Beast. I can't say whether seizing control of The Beast caused him to travel through space and time to kill Jeffrey Epstein or whether a quantum even allowed him to kill Jeffery Epstein and the result of the quantum relocation caused confusion where he seized control of The Beast, but it all makes sense.
Oh yea! I forgot all about that time he hijacked The Beast and then kidnapped Greta Thunberg and forcefed her Big Mac's as he drove her across the Atlantic to turn her over to his Jewish Overlords in the Mossad while throwing cards out the window that simply said "Tariff" as he passed through the EU.
The fact that Epstein died under questionable circumstances while Trump was President - in a federal detention facility - is a complete and total coincidence. COINCIDENCE I tell ya.
Their long friendship and Trump's questionable sexual ethics is also a major coincidence. As is the fact that Trump ran a teen pageant and Epstein procured teen age girls. ALL major coincidences.
Keep repeating it. As more and more evidence comes out just keep repeating it. It's a witch-hunt. Biden didn't use it in the election. These are the talking points. You have your orders. Don't let the pedo down.
Nobody believes you’re an attorney.
So youre saying youre not actually a lawyer?
Attorneys sometimes patronize the coffee shop where he is employed.
Keep repeating it.
You are.
Who is Katie Johnson?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnib-OORRRo&t=26s
What does she have to say in this tape recorded video that is available on youtube?
Wow, you totally did the thing. Like, not even the NYT or WaPo went there.
But you sure did.
You're not really an attorney, are you. What are you like, some Chitown punk with a DEI JD that failed the bar a few times?
"I've got the smoking gun, your honor! It's smoking!!!"
"That's a stick, and your pants are on fire."
"...But you sure did..."
Well, the asswipe is a lying pile of steaming TDS-addled shit, so set your expectations in the gutter and you won't be surprised.
Dude, "Katie Johnson" was a hoax perpetrated by former Jerry Springer Show producer Norm Lubow.
The Guardian exposed the hoax way back in July, 2016.
And did you notice that, when NYS opened up a year for all and sundry to sue Trump, only E. Jean did?
Still no match for Hillary the badass assassin! 😉
Altruist Totalitarian pederasts stick together till the bitter end...
You forgot his shady bank and real estate dealings in Russia.
So, if Trump wasn't a pedophile, Comey was a really, really shitty FBI director... and he and Schiff and a few others should go to jail... and if Trump was a pedophile, Comey was a really, really, *really* shitty FBI director... and he and Schiff and a few others should go to jail.
Shit! We accidentally covered up the fact that he's a pedophile with a fake Russian dossier!
Uh, the Bush brothers gave pEestain the sweetheart deal! It’s Bush senior who is a known groper of minor females. Do that math!
the #1 country song on Billboard was made by AI
♬ That little girl, she’s my son. ♬
For the yutes that want to sing along and may not recognize the tune.
An old dev sat at midnight,
His screen a ghostly glow,
He typed a line, the code compiled,
The data streams did flow.
When lightning flashed through fiber lines,
by the output he was wowed,
He saw a swarm of phantom text—
Ghostwriters in the cloud.
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
Ghooostwriiiitersss in... the clouu-oud.
Their words were made of ether,
Their code was stitched from dreams,
Their syntax bled through circuits,
In endless algorithm streams.
They wrote in unseen languages,
No mortal could avow,
A thousand lines of haunted prose—
Ghostwriters in the cloud.
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
They’re typing still somehow...
Their fingers left no fingerprints,
Their thoughts were made of code,
They conjured art and poetry
From data’s heavy load.
But every verse they generated
Carried one solemn vow:
“Beware the prompt that wakes the dead—
Ghostwriters in the cloud.”
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
Their voices soft, but loud...
Now when your chatbox flickers,
And strange replies abound,
You’ll hear them hum in datastreams,
Those souls of lost renown.
They’re crafting endless stories,
No rest will they allow—
Their cursors blaze in spectral light,
Ghooostwriiiitersss in... the clouu-oud.
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
Ghooostwriiiitersss in... the clouu-oud...
clever!
The name of the victim Trump spent “hours with” was redacted by Democrats. This was done intentionally. It’s Virginia Giuffre, her identify was unmasked some time ago. Why did they conceal her ID? Because Giuffre praised Trump in her book as having done nothing wrong.
The investigator in Florida said that Trump was the only person that returned his calls and spoke freely with him about Epstein. Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago because of his behavior with young ladies.
I'm not sure why the Democrats think these emails are some type of "revelation" except they are looking to distract from their own failures. If there was real evidence of wrong-doing by Trump, it would have been leaked long ago.
Correct. Petti is a fucking hack. (Pic of redacted and unredacted version of email included)
“And there it is…
Democrats intentionally redacted “Virginia” because the name would 100% vindicate him.
All democrats do is lie.”
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1988678882980192450
#FirePetti
Out of a cannon and into a woodchipper.
These Epstein/Maxwell emails reference Virginia Giuffre.
Giuffre's testimony contradicts them:
She never saw Trump and Epstein together.
Trump never acted inappropriately towards her (no sex and no flirting).
She was never at Epstein's house with Trump.
https://x.com/Techno_Fog/status/1988631109140136078
She committed Trumpicide like pEestain!! Nothing to see here! 😉
Democrats know even the idiots at reason will push their narrative.
There is no leftist talking point that Reason will not regurgitate.
This one was widely discredited before Reason even published this. Facts are changing so fast they’re going back in time to do it.
They don't actually believe that this is some sort of revelation. They believe that their retarded base is gullible enough to fall for it. And they're apparently correct about that.
If they had any, I mean any evidence at all that Trump was involved with child molestation or direct involvement with Epstein then the democrat would never have created all the fake fucking charges they did to try and destroy Trump.
trump would have been destroyed instantly.
So this is all bullshit people trying to stay relevant and the typical democrats attempts to destroy Trump continuing on after a decade.
trump would have been destroyed instantly.
lol no. The MAGA cult will defend him to the bitter end. Even if it means they wind up defending a child predator. They will rationalize it and justify it somehow: "sure he's a child predator, but at least he's not OBAMA!" Something like that.
Fuck off, fat boy. Your Democrat boos elected a state AG who wished violence on children and are likely to nominate a Senate candidate who had a Totenkopf tattoo till about five minutes ago.
Your bleating, moralizing accusations about what trump fans might have done in an alternate universe are ridiculous.
The DNC just released a “new” email that had the name of the woman that testified that Trump wasn’t involved redacted, even though the exact same email with her name NOT redacted has already been public.
And Reason and Lying Jeffy are going to pretend otherwise because they are completely dishonest. Petti might just be a moron, but Lying Jeffy is good with it because he’s a literal psychopath.
The redacted woman in the email is known and she testified that Trump didn’t do anything inappropriate to her. Did Bluesky mention this part and still advocate for gaslighting or did you get taken for a ride by dishonest team D?
He is onboard for the ride, he loves it. His posts show how disgusting he is.
Sorry but you are fucking WRONG and by reading this post I can see you're very disgusting as well.
You are projecting who and how you are onto others you hate. Typical democrat action.
I don’t call him Lying Jeffy for nothing.
A bigoted pathological liar MAPedo.
He got more than just the MAGA vote. And if they had evidence of hard crimes they would have filed those to make sure he actually went to prison.
Instead they decided to go with the Carroll, legal fees, and valuation cases, that even Joe Biden could tell were as flimsy as cold bacon.
I think you are confusing MAGA with the Clinton's sycophants.
Wow.
This was an absolutely shit article.
Not an ounce of news or truth about it.
Auditioning for the NYT, Petti?
No one cares. The MAGAs are ok with Trump being a kiddy diddler and the rest of us already hate him for it.
Who did Trump diddle?
Melania was the recruiter for pEestain.
Katie Johnson?
A fake story. Way to get duped, WindyCityBarista.
You think Starbucks would hire such a pathetic piece of shit?
Well...
No one cares. Leftists are ok with other leftists telling blatant lies and the rest of us already hate them for it.
You seem to be the worst offender of attempting to project exactly who and how you are in all it's disgustingness onto others.
Not shocked you fell for another liberal lie being your doctorate was being retarded. Actual relevant documents here.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/epstein-victim-testimony-clears-trump?publication_id=274771&post_id=178708797&isFreemail=true&r=n1v0
"The MAGAs are ok with Trump being a kiddy diddler..."
Not a single piece of evidence make the claim he is and fuck you wit a barb-wire-wrapped baseball bat, asswipe.
Got anything to back that up? No. We do know that Biden took showers with his daughter and had a fondness for grabbing and sniffing kids hair. We also know a whole lot of Democrats are desperately trying to steer this investigation away from them.
More pettifogerry from Reason.
Not even pettifogerry (IMO). Straight up misrepresentation/lying/perjury/fraud/malpractice.
Pettifogging: We don't *know* that Trump didn't meet with one or more victims. Lots of details are left out and nobody anywhere has them.
Misrepresentation: We know who Trump met with, where, for how long, who else was there and what was discussed. The details are known and were left out on purpose by people trying deliberately misrepresent the facts and lie by willful omission.
'...The details are known and were left out on purpose by *TDS-addled slimy piles of lying shit* trying deliberately misrepresent the facts and lie by willful omission...'
Fixed. Petti needs to get reamed with a baseball bat wrapped in barb wire and then, as a certified asswipe, fuck off and die.
From the NYT that broke the story Petti rushed to push. Deeper in the article.
The committee’s staff redacted victims’ names and any identifying information from the emails. Because the full set of documents has not been released, it was not clear whether the emails had been excerpted from larger conversations that might have provided fuller context. …
[The Republicans also identified the victim] whose name was redacted in the emails [as Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide in April.] Ms. Giuffre had said that Ms. Maxwell recruited her into Mr. Epstein’s sex ring while she was working at Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump’s private club and residence in Palm Beach, as a teenager.
In a 2016 deposition for a civil case, Ms. Giuffre was asked if she believed Mr. Trump had witnessed the sexual abuse of minors in Mr. Epstein’s home.
“I don’t think Donald Trump participated in anything,” she said.
“I never saw or witnessed Donald Trump participate in those acts, but was he in the house of Jeffrey Epstein,” Ms. Giuffre added. “I’ve heard he has been, but I haven’t seen him myself so I don’t know.”
So why not include this petti? Even here the NYT lies as this was already publicly and unredacted.
God damn. Reason even top paged this piece of shit liberal propaganda posing as an article.
If the Dems could have nailed Trump on something legit, they would have done it long, long, ago.
Ugly (and boring) Hollywood doing their thing.
TBH I'm tired of hearing about what low-tier politicians and judges think anymore.
I would like to see all the cards on the table. There is circumstantial evidence of Trumps involvement but as of yet no hard evidence. But what is interesting is the amount of political capital being spent to keep information of Epstein crimes out of the public sphere. I have to wonder if there is something bigger and darker that was happening. I like to know for sure.
The most overwhelming participatory evidence is bill Clinton and dem funder Reid Hoffman parody.
And former prince Andrew, whose family we fought 2 wars to not have to give a shit about.
'...we fought *and funded* 2 wars...'
(along with your fucked-up NHS, assholes)
Fixed.
Then your suggesting Trump is protecting Bill Clinton, is that correct?
No, asswipe; don't bother trying to figure out the thoughts of others. You are a particularly imbecilic piece of TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit who should fuck off and die.
ENB, Lizzy, you must be loving this!
Behold this email in which a "journalist" advises a convicted sex offender to let Trump lie to gain leverage, using terms like "valuable PR and political currency." He should "hang Trump" on his words to gain "positive benefits". The only time Epstein should correct the record if it would appear that Trump might win, which apparently sets him up as his savior and "generate a debt"
Any defense attorney worth anything would tear apart this "evidence" in court, even if we didn't know the redacted "victim" was someone who largely cleared his client of any wrongdoing. An unbiased journalist, no matter how deep his personal antipathy towards Trump, could not see this email as anything other than cynical opportunism at best and a criminal conspiracy at worst.
Charitably - Trump knew about the abuse, told Epstein to give up membership to Mar a Lago, and told his madam to stop. His only sin then is not alerting the police, a stretch given that literally no one implicated him in anything.
Long story short, this is an evidence of possible blackmail concocted by a pedophile who saw someone accused of being one of his clients as a lifeline. I mean, it's not as if the language of the conversation is subtle. If someone tells Epstein "hold your tongue to keep Trump beholden to you," how can whatever affirmative response given to that be considered as credible?
The emails don't implicate Trump directly in any sexual abuse ... [but they] do suggest that Trump knew a lot more about Epstein than he let on—and that he has something to hide about their relationship." (emphasis in original)
Titans of journalism, reduced to backyard gossip. *Sheesh* Give it up, people. You're embarrassing yourselves.
Even as devil's advocate/good faith/"were the roles reversed, people would need to know", at this point you're only attracting and agitating the kooks. The very sort of people who will burn down your business and shoot immigrants in order to get Mamdani elected.
Tell us again how Donnie's pal hanged himself shaving...
Remember way back when God's Own Pederasts got one of their own to infiltrate "The Intellectual Activist" and convince the world libertarians were the real pedo pimps? How odd for the truth to take this long to leak out.
"...But the emails do suggest that Trump knew a lot more about Epstein than he let on—and that he has something to hide about their relationship..."
To TDS-addled lying piles of slimy shit they do.
This facile repeating of anti-factual partisan talking points is why libertarians have abandoned Reason. Even if you are going to have a strong anti-Trump take, at a niche magazine like Reason it should be thoughtful and factual and include details not covered elsewhere. Parroting talking points for a political party that isnt even libertarian is pathetic.