Jeffrey Epstein: Trump 'Spent Hours At My House' With Victim
Congressional investigators released emails from the late sex trafficker discussing how to leverage his relationship with the future president.
The case of Jeffrey Epstein just won't go away, much to President Donald Trump's chagrin. "For years, it's Epstein, over and over again," Trump complained in a July 2025 social media rant, calling the deceased pedophile "a guy who never dies." And indeed, the more information comes out through congressional investigations and journalistic leaks, the worse it looks for Trump.
On Wednesday, the House Oversight Committee released three emails from Epstein's inbox discussing Trump. In 2011, Epstein wrote to his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell, that a victim "spent hours at my house with" Trump. (White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt named the victim as the late Virginia Giuffre in a statement denouncing the email release.) In 2019, Epstein wrote to journalist Michael Wolff that Trump "asked me to resign," apparently from Trump's club, Mar-a-Lago. "[O]f course he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop," Epstein added.
Maxwell told administration lawyers in an August 2025 jailhouse interview that she "never witnessed the president in any inappropriate setting in any way" and that Trump "was a gentleman in all respects." She plans to apply for Trump to commute her sentence.
The third email is a back-and-forth conversation between Epstein and Wolff from 2015, discussing then-candidate Trump's upcoming interview with CNN. Wolff told Epstein that Trump was going to be asked about their relationship, and Epstein asked Wolff to "craft an answer" for Trump. Wolff suggested that letting Trump deny their relationship in public would give Epstein leverage.
"If he says he hasn't been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency," Wolff wrote. "You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt." CNN didn't end up asking Trump the question, according to The New York Times.
The emails don't implicate Trump directly in any sexual abuse, and the 2019 message about Maxwell actually backs up Trump's claim that he kicked Epstein out of his club for poaching employees. But the emails do suggest that Trump knew a lot more about Epstein than he let on—and that he has something to hide about their relationship.
In September 2025, the House Oversight Committee released a sexually suggestive letter from Trump to Epstein talking about their "wonderful secret." It was part of a 2003 birthday book full of letters to Epstein, including a note from former President Bill Clinton, a close Epstein associate.
And it isn't just American politicians who are facing questions about their relationship with Epstein. In August 2025, Reason reported on a trove of leaked emails between Epstein and his business partner, former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak.
The emails revealed that Epstein had been in contact with Britain's former Prince Andrew much longer than acknowledged—the prince was stripped of his titles last month over the scandal—and that Epstein and Barak had been trying to get into the surveillance business in America, Russia, and Israel together.
Building on those email leaks and the House Oversight Committee documents, Drop Site News revealed last month that Barak used Epstein's business ties for secret diplomatic talks with Russia about the future of Syria, as well as other international ventures. On Tuesday, Drop Site News reported that Barak's chief of staff had stayed at Epstein's apartment for weeks at a time.
Epstein was arrested for sexually exploiting minors in 2006 and given a plea deal that allowed him to spend only a year in jail. After victim lawsuits and press coverage started to mount, authorities reopened the sex trafficking case against Epstein in 2019. He died in custody a month later. At the time, it looked like the case would die with him; Epstein's name was transformed into a conspiracy theorist punchline.
But during the 2024 campaign, Trump offhandedly agreed to open up the government's files on Epstein, a campaign promise he would come to regret. In February 2025, the department announced that it was releasing "The Epstein Files: Phase 1," only to publish a set of already public documents. Shortly after, the Department of Justice informed Trump that his name appeared several times in Epstein's case file, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The Department of Justice then declared that there was actually nothing more to see in July 2025. "You got a lot of people that could be mentioned in those files that don't deserve to be," Trump told reporters in August 2025, insisting that he is "in support of keeping it totally open" anyways.
Democrats had been reluctant to push too hard on Trump's relationship with Epstein during the 2016 and 2020 elections, perhaps because some of them also had ties to Epstein. In fact, two Democratic candidates in 2020 attacked Trump for entertaining "conspiracy theories" about Epstein.
After Trump made it clear that he didn't want the files opened, however, Democrats seized on the Epstein case. The House Oversight Committee demanded documents from the Department of Justice and Epstein's estate, including the birthday book, whose existence was first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
Meanwhile, Reps. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D–Calif.) have been pushing—against the will of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.)—for a full release of the Department of Justice files on Epstein. Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D–Ariz.) says that she will sign Massie and Khanna's discharge petition after being sworn in on Wednesday afternoon, forcing a vote next month.
Johnson has tried to use the House Oversight Committee investigation to preempt Massie and Khanna's proposal. "The bipartisan House oversight committee is already accomplishing what the discharge petition, that gambit, sought, and much more," Johnson told reporters last month.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
So the Oversight Dems release a redacted version of a set of previously released unredacted emails, and call it new, and make some vague allegations. And the media just repeats it uncritically.
Meanwhile, other people have actually spent some time looking into it, and have found the entire thing to be baseless:
https://notthebee.com/article/media-says-trump-knew-about-underage-girls-and-epstein-forget-to-mention-important-detail
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1988644936707977703
TRUMP IS INNOCENT!! HE'S THE EARTHLY REINCARNATION OF JESUS!!! LEAVE DONALD ALONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Special Ed, that was…special.
Pretty telling Special Ed assumes anyone that isn’t a pedo is like Jesus.
Jeffsarc like to occasionally toss out the “either/or” exaggeration as well.
Keeping the moniker Special i see.
Not only a redacted version, but one they redacted to remove Guiffre'sname who already testified trump was never involved.
If the DoJ had evidence of Trump acting like that New Hampshire tranny Democratic Party thing with a child, Biden would have used that to prosecute him over it.
The shutdown didn't go their way, so they needed to drop a distraction.
And while he was with Jeff he colluded with Russians to rape a woman in a department store while he was making a pee tape and killing Venezuelan fishermen!
At this point I suspect we're about 6 mos. from previously undiscovered footage showing that Trump killed Epstein.
Probably some sort of quantum delocalization somehow associated with seizing control of The Beast. I can't say whether seizing control of The Beast caused him to travel through space and time to kill Jeffrey Epstein or whether a quantum even allowed him to kill Jeffery Epstein and the result of the quantum relocation caused confusion where he seized control of The Beast, but it all makes sense.
Oh yea! I forgot all about that time he hijacked The Beast and then kidnapped Greta Thunberg and forcefed her Big Mac's as he drove her across the Atlantic to turn her over to his Jewish Overlords in the Mossad while throwing cards out the window that simply said "Tariff" as he passed through the EU.
So, if Trump wasn't a pedophile, Comey was a really, really shitty FBI director... and he and Schiff and a few others should go to jail... and if Trump was a pedophile, Comey was a really, really, *really* shitty FBI director... and he and Schiff and a few others should go to jail.
Shit! We accidentally covered up the fact that he's a pedophile with a fake Russian dossier!
the #1 country song on Billboard was made by AI
♬ That little girl, she’s my son. ♬
For the yutes that want to sing along and may not recognize the tune.
An old dev sat at midnight,
His screen a ghostly glow,
He typed a line, the code compiled,
The data streams did flow.
When lightning flashed through fiber lines,
by the output he was wowed,
He saw a swarm of phantom text—
Ghostwriters in the cloud.
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
Ghooostwriiiitersss in... the clouu-oud.
Their words were made of ether,
Their code was stitched from dreams,
Their syntax bled through circuits,
In endless algorithm streams.
They wrote in unseen languages,
No mortal could avow,
A thousand lines of haunted prose—
Ghostwriters in the cloud.
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
They’re typing still somehow...
Their fingers left no fingerprints,
Their thoughts were made of code,
They conjured art and poetry
From data’s heavy load.
But every verse they generated
Carried one solemn vow:
“Beware the prompt that wakes the dead—
Ghostwriters in the cloud.”
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
Their voices soft, but loud...
Now when your chatbox flickers,
And strange replies abound,
You’ll hear them hum in datastreams,
Those souls of lost renown.
They’re crafting endless stories,
No rest will they allow—
Their cursors blaze in spectral light,
Ghooostwriiiitersss in... the clouu-oud.
Yippee-yi-AI, yippee-yi-ohhh,
Ghooostwriiiitersss in... the clouu-oud...
The name of the victim Trump spent “hours with” was redacted by Democrats. This was done intentionally. It’s Virginia Giuffre, her identify was unmasked some time ago. Why did they conceal her ID? Because Giuffre praised Trump in her book as having done nothing wrong.
The investigator in Florida said that Trump was the only person that returned his calls and spoke freely with him about Epstein. Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago because of his behavior with young ladies.
I'm not sure why the Democrats think these emails are some type of "revelation" except they are looking to distract from their own failures. If there was real evidence of wrong-doing by Trump, it would have been leaked long ago.
Correct. Petti is a fucking hack. (Pic of redacted and unredacted version of email included)
“And there it is…
Democrats intentionally redacted “Virginia” because the name would 100% vindicate him.
All democrats do is lie.”
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1988678882980192450
#FirePetti
Out of a cannon and into a woodchipper.
These Epstein/Maxwell emails reference Virginia Giuffre.
Giuffre's testimony contradicts them:
She never saw Trump and Epstein together.
Trump never acted inappropriately towards her (no sex and no flirting).
She was never at Epstein's house with Trump.
https://x.com/Techno_Fog/status/1988631109140136078
Democrats know even the idiots at reason will push their narrative.
There is no leftist talking point that Reason will not regurgitate.
This one was widely discredited before Reason even published this. Facts are changing so fast they’re going back in time to do it.
If they had any, I mean any evidence at all that Trump was involved with child molestation or direct involvement with Epstein then the democrat would never have created all the fake fucking charges they did to try and destroy Trump.
trump would have been destroyed instantly.
So this is all bullshit people trying to stay relevant and the typical democrats attempts to destroy Trump continuing on after a decade.
trump would have been destroyed instantly.
lol no. The MAGA cult will defend him to the bitter end. Even if it means they wind up defending a child predator. They will rationalize it and justify it somehow: "sure he's a child predator, but at least he's not OBAMA!" Something like that.
Fuck off, fat boy. Your Democrat boos elected a state AG who wished violence on children and are likely to nominate a Senate candidate who had a Totenkopf tattoo till about five minutes ago.
Your bleating, moralizing accusations about what trump fans might have done in an alternate universe are ridiculous.
The DNC just released a “new” email that had the name of the woman that testified that Trump wasn’t involved redacted, even though the exact same email with her name NOT redacted has already been public.
And Reason and Lying Jeffy are going to pretend otherwise because they are completely dishonest. Petti might just be a moron, but Lying Jeffy is good with it because he’s a literal psychopath.
The redacted woman in the email is known and she testified that Trump didn’t do anything inappropriate to her. Did Bluesky mention this part and still advocate for gaslighting or did you get taken for a ride by dishonest team D?
He is onboard for the ride, he loves it. His posts show how disgusting he is.
Sorry but you are fucking WRONG and by reading this post I can see you're very disgusting as well.
You are projecting who and how you are onto others you hate. Typical democrat action.
Wow.
This was an absolutely shit article.
Not an ounce of news or truth about it.
Auditioning for the NYT, Petti?
No one cares. The MAGAs are ok with Trump being a kiddy diddler and the rest of us already hate him for it.
Who did Trump diddle?
No one cares. Leftists are ok with other leftists telling blatant lies and the rest of us already hate them for it.
You seem to be the worst offender of attempting to project exactly who and how you are in all it's disgustingness onto others.
More pettifogerry from Reason.
From the NYT that broke the story Petti rushed to push. Deeper in the article.
The committee’s staff redacted victims’ names and any identifying information from the emails. Because the full set of documents has not been released, it was not clear whether the emails had been excerpted from larger conversations that might have provided fuller context. …
[The Republicans also identified the victim] whose name was redacted in the emails [as Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide in April.] Ms. Giuffre had said that Ms. Maxwell recruited her into Mr. Epstein’s sex ring while she was working at Mar-a-Lago, Mr. Trump’s private club and residence in Palm Beach, as a teenager.
In a 2016 deposition for a civil case, Ms. Giuffre was asked if she believed Mr. Trump had witnessed the sexual abuse of minors in Mr. Epstein’s home.
“I don’t think Donald Trump participated in anything,” she said.
“I never saw or witnessed Donald Trump participate in those acts, but was he in the house of Jeffrey Epstein,” Ms. Giuffre added. “I’ve heard he has been, but I haven’t seen him myself so I don’t know.”
So why not include this petti? Even here the NYT lies as this was already publicly and unredacted.