Britain and Colombia Cut Off U.S. Intelligence Access Over Caribbean Boat Bombings
The two U.S. allies were OK with helping arrest suspected drug smugglers, but not with helping kill them.
Colombian President Gustavo Petro publicly ordered the military to stop sharing information with the U.S. government on Tuesday in response to U.S. military strikes against suspected smuggling boats in the Caribbean Sea. And Britain privately did the same over a month ago, according to a CNN report published the same day. Both countries have been happy to cooperate with Washington against drug trafficking, but think that the decision to kill the suspected smugglers at sea is a step too far.
At least one of the people killed in the boat bombings was a Colombian citizen. "He may have been carrying fish, or he may have been carrying cocaine, but he had not been sentenced to death," Petro said in a speech on Sunday, according to the Associated Press. "There was no need to murder him." After Petro criticized the U.S. military campaign last month, the U.S. Treasury accused Petro of being complicit in drug smuggling and imposed financial sanctions on him, his wife, and his son.
Although Britain is usually not thought of as a Caribbean country, it used to be a major colonial power there and still has several Caribbean territories. For the past few years, Britain has both been carrying out its own antidrug patrols and passing along tips to the U.S. Coast Guard through the Joint Interagency Task Force South in Florida. After the U.S. began bombing suspects, the British government determined that the intelligence sharing was illegal.
Another neighboring country whose citizens were killed, Trinidad and Tobago, has been more supportive of the campaign. "I have no sympathy for traffickers; the US military should kill them all violently," Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar said in a September 2025 statement.
The Trump administration has acknowledged that it is choosing to kill suspects that it could have arrested otherwise. "Instead of interdicting [the boat], on the president's orders, we blew it up," Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters after the first boat strike in September 2025. He argued that arresting traffickers and seizing their cargo "doesn't work" because cartels plan for those losses anyway. Administration lawyers argue that drug cartels are wartime enemies, so they can be killed rather than arrested, while also denying that the president is limited by constitutional war powers in this campaign.
One of the problems, as Petro pointed out, is that it's impossible to tell which of the victims were carrying cocaine and which were carrying fish. The independent Venezuelan newspaper El Pitazo reports that one of the destroyed boats was carrying drugs, and that it left from an area frequented by drug smugglers, migrants, and fishermen alike. On the other hand, Ecuador released one of the boat strike survivors for lack of evidence, and the family of one Trinidadian victim insists that he was only a fisherman.
The Trump administration has strongly signalled that the antidrug campaign is really a pretext to overthrow Venezuela's socialist President Nicolás Maduro, whom Trump accuses of drug smuggling. After Maduro's disputed 2018 reelection, Venezuela's parliament invoked a constitutional process to install a new president, and American leaders from both parties have declared Maduro an illegitimate leader. Rubio, according to The Atlantic, used the drug issue to push President Donald Trump away from negotiations with Maduro and toward a forcible regime change policy.
The U.S. military has built up its forces in the Caribbean—including the world's largest aircraft carrier, as of this week—far beyond what is necessary to blow up small speedboats. "I'm not gonna tell you what I'm gonna do with Venezuela, if I was gonna do it or if I wasn't going to do it," Trump told CBS News earlier this month. Whatever he's planning, at least two important U.S. allies have decided to count themselves out, because they don't have faith in the administration's restraint.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
>>The U.S. military has built up its forces in the Caribbean ... far beyond what is necessary to blow up small speedboats.
did Pete tell you this at breakfast or are you pontificating?
Petti is just being petty again. Because Trump.
Matt is pettifogging?
Petty pettifogging while wearing the petticoat of a petty officer.
Britain will be far better off when the government there is finally overthrown and they execute their Marxists.
The UK is rapidly becoming an Islamist state so I'm not sure they should be dictating US foreign policy.
Don’t forget the rise of communism. The only way out is through revolution.
Britain has fallen to authoritarianism and Islam. They are no longer our ally. They are an enemy of liberal values, and therefore an enemy of the United States.
There is no such thing as "far beyond what is necessary" when it comes to military action.
“A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next week.”
-Patton
The Trump administration has strongly signalled that the antidrug campaign is really a pretext to overthrow Venezuela's socialist President Nicolás Maduro, whom Trump accuses of drug smuggling.
Considering the aircraft carrier just arrived and dems just released some emails (weakly) implicating Trump's involvement with Epstein, now may be just the right time to get this Venezuela war started.
Does the US have a right to it’s sovereignty?
No.
Thank you for being honest for a change. It’s good to know you come from a place where you don’t consider America to be a sovereign nation, but just a global territory with no right to its own borders, language, culture, self defense, system of government, or individual rights.
That puts you in the same category as JeffSarc, Shrike, Tony, SQRLSY, KAR, 5.56, etc..
Thank you again.
That puts you in the same category as JeffSarc, Shrike, Tony, SQRLSY, KAR, 5.56, etc..
Not to mention Mises, Rothbard etc. Rejecting sovereignty of states and acknowledging only sovereignty of individuals is THE litmus test for libertarianism.
“The only true national autonomy is the freedom of the individual against the state and society.”
“All rational action is in the first place individual action. Only the individual thinks. Only the individual reasons. Only the individual acts.”
Ludwig Von Mises (see Nation, State, and Economy and his collected quotations / works)
The pure solution he envisages, at least theoretically, is the personal ownership of every piece of land so that people will associate according to their cultural affinities on territories the individuals own.... voluntary aggregation (groups by consent) is contained in the idea of Panarchy that eliminates territorial sovereignty altogether and aims at a social organization based on virtual or non-territorial communities.
-Murray N. Rothbard
Nations by Consent: Decomposing the Nation-State
https://www.panarchy.org/rothbard/nation.html
Sorry Quixy, they didn’t believe the US is just some open borders territory. Nice try though. Reimagining their work as an endorsement of Sorosite international Marxism.
You need not apologize for misunderstanding my beliefs. I got used to it.
If Mises or Rothbard posted here, you'd call them marxists too.
I understand you just fine. And no, you’re just misrepresenting them.
OK whatever. Enough about me.
But when will it be enough FROM you?
So this all justifies in your mind being a terrorist because they are individuals and therefore can do what they want no matter the harm caused?
Britain would probably respond differently if the "drug runners" were shouting anti-Islam slogans or castigating rape gangs.
Those are the most evil people on earth!
UK is mad they don't have the balls to splash the similar boats bringing all the rapefugees currently conquering Britian.
Most of Western Europe has been deballed for quite some time now. Macron is an example of that. His wife slaps him around I. Public and pegs him in private.
Their Akita sees her as pack leader.
The drug smugglers have much nicer boats.
"it's impossible to tell which of the victims were carrying cocaine and which were carrying fish."
The bundles of cocaine / fentanyl / heroin found floating in the water afterwards are just there by coincidence.
‘President’ Kamala would have welcome those narcoterrorists with open arms.
It's impossible to tell cocaine and fish apart. Like that time I was at the restaurant and they politely asked me to leave when I started shoving the sea bass up my nose.
IT WAS AN HONEST MISTAKE.
The drug packages were planted there by Epstein and Putin.
Colombian President Gustavo Petro publicly ordered the military to stop sharing information with the U.S. government on Tuesday in response to U.S. military strikes against suspected smuggling boats in the Caribbean Sea. And Britain privately did the same over a month ago, according to a CNN report published the same day. Both countries have been happy to cooperate with Washington against drug trafficking, but think that the decision to kill the suspected smugglers at sea is a step too far.
Wow, Trump's extra-judicial killings of drug smugglers might end up being the Section 230 of the Five Eyes era.
"After Petro criticized the U.S. military campaign last month, the U.S. Treasury accused Petro of being complicit in drug smuggling and imposed financial sanctions on him, his wife, and his son."
This shows Trump to be exactly who and twat He is... A big fat BULLY!!!
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⡝⠳⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⠀⠀⠈⠳⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⠖⠛⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠛⠳⢦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⡴⠛⠉⣽⣦⣴⣦⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣄⣶⡌⠉⠙⠲⡄⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢸⠃⠀⠀⠙⣿⣿⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠻⣿⡿⠃⠀⠀⠀⣻⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⢀⣘⣧⠀⠀⠀⠈⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⢠⣟⣀⠀⠀
⢀⡼⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⣶⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⢳⡀
⢸⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠻⠿⢿⡿⠿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡇
⠈⢷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀SSqrlsy eats feces⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡼⠁
⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀
If only SQRLSY could eat ASCII.
"Administration lawyers argue that drug cartels are wartime enemies, so they can be killed rather than arrested"
If nothing else, this violates the Geneva Conventions to which the United States is a signatory. But it's irrelevent because it's just an excuse anyway. The President decided he wanted to kill something so he just went ahead and did it, finding some willing henchmen in the military to go along whether or not it's legal and whether or not his excuses make any sense legally. Killing innocent children with drones at a daycare center with some adult international aid workers was just an oopsie! according to the Deep State and should not be counted as evidence against the certainty the military seems to have that these boats are violating United States laws.
Now tell me your thoughts on Hamas.
Wait wait... you probably think that's called "Palestine." Anyway, thoughts?
According to international rules of war, irregular combatants not in uniform may be killed in the field rather that being taken prisoner.
In the comment above: Another motherfucker blatantly lying about international law.
Which article(s) of which Geneva Convention(s)) are being violated? He of course won't say, because he's fucking full of shit.
Y'know this is just going to increase the risk that we DO accidentally get it wrong at some point.
Just help us kill the drug smugglers, jerks. What's wrong with you?
Accused, therefor guilty? Twat's "wrong" with SOME of us, is that we are SNOT addicts of Power Piggery and KILLING the accused merely because they ARE accused, by us! Nor are we Swilling Servants, Serpents, and Slurp-Pants of the Evil One, like SOME so-called "people" (actually demons in human guise) who I could mention!
They would consider that a win, because it might slightly embarrass Trump. Just oook wt what our democrats went through with the shutdown, just to try and hurt him.
The left would see a million people die just to chip a point or two off Trump’s poll numbers.
They're signaling to send to drugs to them because of how abhorrent the socialist policies have become there people need to get high to stop from killing themselves, as sad as it is.
Of course the bad guys will never admit they are bad guys. All terrorists act the same way...
But but but I was just fishing, I had no idea what was in the packages, they are not mine. Someone gave them to me and asked me to deliver them since I was on my way to the region to fish...