D.C. Jury Acquits 'Sandwich Guy' of Assaulting Federal Agent
A jury found Sean Dunn, who went viral in August for throwing a Subway sandwich at a Border Patrol officer, not guilty.
A jury today acquitted Sean Dunn, the Washington, D.C., man who went viral in August for hurling a footlong Subway sandwich at a Border Patrol officer.
The jury deliberated for several hours over Wednesday and this afternoon before finding Dunn, a former Justice Department paralegal, not guilty of misdemeanor assault on a federal law enforcement officer. The verdict is another high-profile embarrassment for federal prosecutors in the District of Columbia, who have repeatedly failed to win convictions or even indictments against residents accused of obstructing or assaulting federal officers deployed as part of the Trump administration's occupation of D.C.
"I would like to thank family and friends and strangers for all of their support, whether it was emotional or spiritual or artistic or financial," Dunn said outside the courthouse following the verdict, according to CNN.
"That night I believed that I was protecting the rights of immigrants," Dunn continued. "And let us not forget that the great seal of the United States says 'E pluribus unum.' That means 'from many, one.' Every life matters no matter where you came from. No matter how you got here, no matter how you identify, you have the right to live a life that is free."
In a statement to Reason, U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said, "As always, we accept a jury's verdict; that is the system within which we function. However, law enforcement should never be subjected to assault, no matter how 'minor'. Even children know when they are angry, they are not allowed to throw objects at one another."
On the night of August 10, a bystander filmed Dunn confronting several Border Patrol officers patrolling the streets of D.C. "Fuck you! You fucking fascists! Why are you here? I don't want you in my city!" Dunn yelled at officers. He then threw a salami sandwich at Border Patrol Officer Greg Lairmore, hitting Lairmore in the chest, before running away with several officers struggling in pursuit.
Dunn's act of defiance led not only to viral fame, memes, and street murals, but an arrest warrant on his apartment, executed by 20 officers in riot gear (and a White House film crew).
However, federal prosecutors originally failed to secure a felony grand jury indictment against Dunn, leading them to refile a lesser misdemeanor assault charge against him. Dunn pleaded not guilty and went to trial.
At the trial this week, Lairmore testified that the salami sandwich "exploded all over" his chest and claimed he could smell mustard and onions. However, a photo showed that the sandwich was still in its wrapper after it landed on the ground.
NBC News reported that Dunn's defense attorneys also noted Lairmore received two gag gifts from coworkers: "a plush sandwich and a patch featuring a cartoon of Dunn throwing the sandwich with the words 'Felony Footlong.'" Dunn's attorneys argued that the gag gifts showed that no one, not even the alleged victim, thought this was a serious matter.
"This case, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, is about a sandwich," Dunn's defense attorney, Sabrina Shroff, said, according to NBC News.
As Reason's Billy Binion wrote, the "disproportionate response to [Dunn's] offense epitomizes why Trump's plan appears to be, at least for now, more political theater than a real solutions-oriented approach" to crime in D.C.
And the outcome of the trial shows what the jury thought of that political theater. CNN reported that one juror "told reporters after the verdict that she didn't think the officer felt threatened by the sandwich and laughed when asked if she felt the sub 'exploded' as the officer claimed."
The verdict is one of several recent instances where prosecutors for the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. have failed to convince local juries to indict or convict defendants accused of assaulting federal law enforcement officers. For example, prosecutors failed to convince three different grand juries to indict a woman accused of assaulting an FBI agent, forcing prosecutors to refile the case as a misdemeanor.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I just am expecting to see red state juries refuse to ever convict anybody who violently assaults a leftist. This cannot be a one way street.
They decision will be sandwiched between the law and verdicts such as this.
Idiotic prosecutions are their bread and butter.
They must have a rye sense of justice.
Thank God none of the participants ended up at the Mayo clinic.
“Stop with the sandwich puns,” sesame.
Lettuce alone.
You have the right to romaine silent.
"If'n ye LIKE yer shit sandwich, ye can KEEP yer shit sandwich!"
-Government Almighty... Of BOAF sides!
(Ye SWILL keep yer shit sandwich, regardless of WHICH liars ye vote for! Shit does SNOT matter, does your open-face shit sandwich fall face-up of face-down, because BOTH sides are ALL covered in shit!!!)
Flag. Refresh.
That’s a rye response.
Depending on which side Your PervFected bread is buttered or shitted upon, this idea may be half-baked...
I know!!!! Let's ALL get baked, and shit won't even matter!!! So don't be such a sour-dough about shit! Shit all around!!! Next round's on me! (Butt SNOT in my face or at my place, PLEASE! Do shit at TRUMP'S place and-or at TRUMP'S defaced face!!! Or at SCROTUS'S face or place!!!)
Crusty old bastards.
The prosecutors are out to lunch.
They’re toast.
The sandwich thrower is a brat—worst kind of example for public servants.
He’s guilty. The embarrassment is with the DC jury that failed to convict.
Democrats should not be allowed to participate on the legal system.
Really? You think some guy throwing a sandwich was worthy of prosecution?
Yes. It was misdemeanor assault. And that applies pretty much everywhere in America. In Washington State it’s called fourth degree assault. And it’s always a bigger deal when the victim is law enforcement.
So I’m not sure why you think this perp was so special.
Actually, it was NOT misdemeanor assault. The jury said so. Under the American system, that's 'game,' 'set,' and 'match.'
DC juries will not convict democrats of anything if it involves democrat narratives. Or were you not aware?
He was guilty.
Too bad for you. The jury's decision is FINAL. He was innocent because the jury found him so.
So I guess those J6 Parsons really rankle you!
J6 detainees were held for years without bail over misdemeanors because the Biden regime wanted to suppress their political opposition (patriotic Americans).
lol bro
They were held without bail because they tried to violently overthrow the US Government. They're lucky they weren't BLM rioters who stormed the Capitol. They would have been killed by LEOs.
"Really? You think some guy throwing a sandwich was worthy of prosecution?"
Really? You think it's NOT? Does the object have to be of a certain weight or hardness?
Fuck off and die, lefty shit.
I do t think Moo Cow has any problem with greater weight or hardness. Length and girth are also desirable factors for him.
100%
When you are open about your rejection of equality.
I would expect red state juries to refuse to ever convict anyone who assaults a leftist with a subway sandwich thrown with such wimpy strength that the person targeted laughs and the sandwich doesn't even come out of its wrapper.
Indeed, I cannot imagine that any prosecutor would be willing to try that case in any other context. "He tossed… a sandwich at you? Were you hurt? Did you suffer any damages at all? No? And you want me to use staff time and resources to prosecute a guy for this?"
Weren't you all for threatening peaceful grandmas for 20 years for walking in a public building for 10 minutes? Eas pretty consistent on the volokh threads.
And youve defended 5 year FACE charges for non violent abortion protests?
So kindly fuck off.
No. And no. You may not be able to help being a dumbass, but you can stop lying.
And you could be a bit less of a lefty sump. Throwing ANYTHING at a person is an assault, regardless of your whining.
Hey man. The sandwich "exploded" on him and he got some "mustard on [his] shirt" and could "smell the onions". (at least while the sandwich stayed entirely within its wrapper)
The cop's lucky to be alive.
TDS-addled lying pile of shit heard from. Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Lol. Someone is sensitive.
Great. So if people come up and start pelting you with food items, it’s totally ok, right? So I’m free to dump a 32 oz. Slurpy over your head.
Glad you really thought that one through.
Amd as far as the perp goes, it’s now ok for republicans to follow him around and throw food items at him whenever he’s in public. Totally legal, right Noob?
Now do spitting in someone's face.
I am not expecting any prosecutors with common sense to ever seek to indict (and then to press a misdemeanor charge against a defendant when two grand juries 'no bill' the case) in any red state or blue state.
After a couple of 'no bills,' any prosecutor with enough sense to be able to pound sand into a rathole would call it a day and give up. If you cannot convince a simple majority of a 24-member grand jury that probable cause exists (a very low standard), how could you expect to convince a petit jury to unanimously find beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime had been committed?
In most places, common sense prevails. But in some others common sense bends the knee to political considerations. The latter is what I suspect is happening here. The prosecution, though silly, is meant to send a message. Whether that message is meant for the general public; or to internal actors [a sort of we got your back] i cannot say.
A prosecutor forced to take this to trial and to then lose..well...not sure what that does for office morale. When the boss is best known as a Fox news personality...perhaps the expectations are low anyway???
You are in no way an attorney.
Astute observation. You must be mensa material.
Care to address LISAFdn's comment about prosecutors striking out on multiple grand juries bringing the same weak case to a jury trial and losing? Because I do practice in criminal law and am familiar with how DA offices function. Being forced to embarrass yourself in a high profile/high visibility case that shouldn't even been pursued does in fact have an effect on morale. Pirro may have been a great attorney at one point in her life. But this isn't 1989. She is 74yrs old and spent way too much time on cable t.v. Perhaps her capacity to judge the value of a case is diminished along with her plastic surgery???
Would this be the same outcome if citizens blocked access to deathcult abortion clinics and tossed sandwiches (or salads) at expecting mothers about to kill their unborn babies? My guess is that they’d be toast.
If it is a cherry or rhubarb pie - they might get life.
Using leftover dried apricots and astronaut orange drink mix as a sweetener: Prune Tang Pie
Those guys got 5-7 years and reason ignored it. Qb said it was deserved because an employee twisted their ankle walking around them.
It’s time to get rid of the far left Marxists. There is no version of events where America survives their continued presence.
The very act of "getting rid" of people whose political beliefs are noxious to you is a "version of events" where America does not survive.
Real Americans defeat political beliefs with which they disagree at the ballot box, not by "getting rid" of the people who espouse them.
Bit hard to win at the ballot box when the other side is shooting at you!
Not sure who is shooting at whom in your scenario but if the best your opponent can do is throw a sandwich, you're almost guaranteed to win.
Blocking a medical clinic (private property) is very different than throwing a sandwich at a police officer in body armor as a way to protest the government. They could have gotten a fine out of the guy if they hadn't overcharged the crime. Instead, they overcharged and got a not guilty verdict. The guy will likely face zero consequences. He may even get his government job back WITH back pay because termination without cause is illegal. If no guilty verdict, there's no just cause.
So is it o.k. to throw cream pies at congresscritters as long as the only harm is they may need some drycleaning?
I'd love watch some stuck up senator get a cream pie to the face. Very entertaining. Wouldn't do it myself but many of them probably deserve it.
The verdict is another high-profile embarrassment for federal prosecutors in the District of Columbia
Clown show.
C.J. Ciaramella: We convicted 'Buffalo Hat guy' but got 'sandwich guy' off. We're unstoppable!
ICE: We deported an average of 800 people a day for the last 6 mos. Hard work is good work. The fight for our country is always worth it. LOL.
Libertarians for the violation of NAP against the other team!
Something. Something. Proportionality.
Something. Something. Bullshit.
In Demjeff bigoted bigly bigot bot’s defense, he’d very much appreciate people throwing food at him. Anyone that does, he’d nom nom nom nominate them for Person of the Year.
Especially now, with his deceased mother's SNAP card not being refilled.
I don't think the government counts as a possible victim of a violation of the NAP.
I never thought a libertarian magazine would celebrate political judiciary outcomes. But here we are.
Unequal execution of the law is libertarian?
Reason celebrates 6 months for Navarro and others. Demands zero time for leftist crimes.
To what libertarian magazine do you refer?
Mostly mises now. Although for some reason even they have Cato writers contributing now.
Jesse's world
What prosecutable assault looks like: effeminate tossing of sandich at a cop
What un-prosecutable peaceful protest looks like: J6 mob beating a cop at the Capital building.
But Reason has partisan bias.
You're mistaking violence AGAINST the government with violence BY the government. Throwing a sandwich isn't really violence anyway. Grab an encyclopedia (Wiki is the best) and remind yourself what libertarianism is all about.
This is not surprising.
During the Jim Crow era, Democratic juries routinely acquitted their team members who assaulted and murdered black citizens.
What about when he assaulted the officers’ fists with his face?
Seriously though, he should have been sentenced to life because of his politics. Had he been a MAGA then the arrest would have been a travesty. But he was protesting MAGA. That makes him an enemy of the state.
These your words?
I back the blue when they’re right. In this case, as you very well know, the cop didn’t know she was unarmed and from his vantage point he couldn’t see the crowd. He just saw someone crawling through a smashed barricade while hearing chaos on the police radio. So based upon what he knew based upon what he could see and hear, he did what he thought was right.
Poor stupid sarcbot.
He should have received the appropriate sentence based on the misdemeanor for which he was guilty. Period.
No less. No more. I know you can’t understand any concept of the rule of law. You only understand democrat dogma.
SCROTUS, he was found not guilty. Therefore, he will receive no punishment. If he had committed the crime he was charged with, in the eyes of the jury, he would have been found guilty. That's how the rule of law works.
Thank you for saying that there should be no juries and you should be the "decider" of all legal matters. Heil....
OT: A federal judge is ordering Trump to fully fund SNAP for November.
So, apparently, leftists DO want a king who can just spend monies not appropriated by Comgress.
Good to know our judges are no longer pretending to let the Constitution guide any decisions.
I wonder whether the jury was instructed on Nullification? or did they just do it on their own?
Its d.c. Activists try to get on all these cases. They are public about it.
Get them on GitMo instead.
It is against the laws/rules to instruct juries about jury nullification.
There are children starving in Africa that only wish that a sandwich would explode on them.
Wow that's uncanny. That's exactly what my mother said when I wouldn't eat liver 60 years ago.
Well, Greasy Grimy Gopher Guts, if'n Ye had SNOT been Pervfectly trying to CUT YER MOMMA'S LIVER OUT, she might SNOT have objected quite so much!!!
(Cutting it out and then REFUSING to eat in, snot EVEN with some nice fava beans, is known ass "playing with yer food", don't cha know?!?!?)
SSqrlsy won’t travel to places with food insecurity since there is likely far less poop for him to eat.
Shrike and Jeffy would love to explode all over the faces of children. Although in Jeffy’s case the only one getting the sandwiches is him.
Remember when Trump assassinated that little American girl and 9 of her little friends?? And we only lost one SEAL in the FUBAR operation? And Trump lied to the Gold Star father?? You voted for that again!!! WTF???
Guess we have a precedent. We can now shout Fuck you! I don't want you in my city!" and throw subway sandwiches at people without fear of reprisal.
Awesome! Time to show up at the Virginia and NJ Governors swearing in ceremonies with 500 sandwiches!
The next sandwiches will be smaller.
You’d like to take a footlong in your face, no?
He chows down on multiple foot longs every weekend at his local bath house.
That's what I said to the hooker in Tijuana.
So very glad we had the time and resources to spend money on this. Not like we could have been doing ANYTHING more important than trying a guy for misdemeanor sandwich throwing.
Better to predicate a false crime scotus had to overturn to get plea agreements from citizens facing 20 years for parading which is never charged. You know, like j6.
If you think J6 was a parade, I have some horse dewormer.... oops, I mean COVID cure to sell you.
How about spending millions prosecuting someone for legally taking out a real estate loan?
Seriously, fuck you. And please do kill yourself. It will save us the trouble when your fellow travelers push too far and you all have to be put down.
You think Trump has wasted millions on the Letitia James prosecution already?
No, asshole, it was her wasting millions on Trump's persecution, but TDS-addled lying piles of slimy shit ignore that.
The prosecution in which a jury found him guilty? Seems like she got the criminal found guilty by a jury which, in case you were unaware, is literally her entire job.
That money could have been spent on transgender surgeries in Guatemala! Lol.
The same amount of money would be spent if prosecutors were left sitting in their offices girl-throwing darts at a photo of (insert your choice of politician you love to hate here) with no cases to prosecute.
If it had been Taco Bell it would have actually been dangerous.
Within seven years all restaurants will be Taco Bell.
I probably wouldn't have pressed charges myself (no harm done and who needs that hassle?), but throwing anything at someone is in fact assault and/or battery (depending on jurisdiction).
Sure, and maybe a suitable punishment might be something like a ticket and a fine. Not this level of a misdemeanor, and certainly not a felony.
No Fatfuck, it was misdemeanor assault. Thats how the real world works. He is guilty, and probably should have gotten 30-90 days home confinement, a fine, and a reasonable probation period.
But democrats like you don’t believe in the rule of law.
He was found innocent of the charges because they overcharged him. If you assault someone and are charged with attempted murder for the assault, the jury will find you not guilty and you cannot be retried due to the Fifth Amendment. You might get "big sad" about it but it is what it is.
Meanwhile,
SCOTUS reinstates Trump transgender passport policy
https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/scotus-reinstates-trump-transgender-passport-policy
“Displaying passport holders’ sex at birth no more offends equal protection principles than displaying their country of birth—in both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment,” the court wrote in its majority opinion.
the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment
Fuckin' evil, backwards conservatives, man.
in both cases, the Government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment
Attesting to an unalterable fact of human biology.
Now if it had been a HAM sandwich - - - - - -
You’re bacon the question.
Don’t be a pig.
Quelle surprise: the people who are declaring "it's a travesty" when sandwich guy is acquitted, are the same ones who celebrate violent criminals getting pardoned because of their politics.
ChatLibertarian, what is bigly bigoted bigot bot Demjeff doing here.
What Demjeff is doing here is making an ass of himself with poor logic, a lack of social skills, gaslighting, and projecting.
ChatGPT: and he seems to be eating 3 kinds of fried foods based on the oil on his keyboard.
Tony, you celebrated and encouraged violent rioters, rapists, and murderers throughout 2020. Now you celebrate the escalating violent actin’s of your fellow travelers among antifa.
You are a hypocritical cunt, and a Marxist traitor. This by your own admission. So you have enough room to condemn anyone. This includes the J6 detainees. Especially after their civil and human rights were serially violated by you filth.
I love when the uneducated throw around words like Marxist. What exactly do the works of Karl Marx have to do with the 2020 riots, the J6 coup attempt or the sandwich thrower at issue here?
J6ers had every right afforded to them. They got the ultimate kid gloves when they attempted to take the Capitol by force and then were under prosecuted.
The best way to deal with them would have been to shoot them as they attempted to enter the Capitol building. 50 dead bodies and the rest of them would have been smart enough to flee from the police. Then, charge the coup organizers including Charlie Kirk. Bonus: he'd still be alive in a nice, warm federal penitentiary.
Well, I can't speak for anyone else. But no one who committed violence on Jan 6 should have been pardoned. But the great majority of those charged or convicted were not in that category, including some who got long sentences.
Hey Jeff, I hope you like tomatoes because when they hit you it is not assault.
I really hope a guy, preferably in a buffalo hat, hurls a sandwich at a democrat congressman in an act of peaceful protest. I'd like to see how that plays out after this.
I think he'd probably have several bullets in him before he released it. "Self defense."
Time to arrange a protest in DC where all Democrat lawmakers have sandwiches, or just tomatoes, thrown at them.
Precedent has been set, it's cold cut combo toss time.
If you support jury nullification, as I do, you have to accept the 'bad' results along with the 'good' ones. Although in this case it looks to me like it ought to have been a misdemeanor charge rather than a felony. (It could be seen as the usual Ham Sandwich Nation practice of overcharging and expecting a plea bargain - only this time the bread was dropped and fell mayo-side down.)
And if the venue were anywhere but Washington DC, I'd invoke the forgotten saw "You don't have to make a Federal case of it!"
The larger problem is that we're in a Cold Civil War, and no system of justice can stand upright during a civil war.
The rot is unstoppable at this point.
Precedent has been set, it's cold cut combo toss time.
This could take the food fight in Animal house to completely new levels.
Everyone remember when you take a tomato in the head it is not assault.
How long before a rogue group of these federal officers, or some other group, knowing nothing will happen in the courts, will take things into their own hands and deal out some street justice?
It should have been a conviction.