Massachusetts Town Votes To Boycott Any Business That 'Sustains Israel's Apartheid'
City officials should spend and invest public funds in the most prudent manner possible.
Residents of Somerville, Massachusetts, voted Tuesday to pass a non-binding ballot measure recommending that city officials abstain from contracting with businesses that sustain "Israel's apartheid, genocide, and illegal occupation of Palestine." The measure passed with 11,489 votes for and 7,920 against.
The initiative was brought forth by Somerville for Palestine—"an intergenerational, interracial, interfaith group of Somerville Community members united in our steadfast advocacy for Palestinian liberation," according to its Instagram account. The measure asked voters whether Sommerville's elected officials should be instructed to "end all current city business and prohibit future city investments and contracts with companies as long as such companies engage in business that sustains Israel's apartheid, genocide, and illegal occupation of Palestine."
That's awfully vague phrasing. Determining whether a business is Israeli is difficult enough, considering the myriad shareholders in publicly traded multinational corporations. Whether a business "sustains Israel's apartheid" is even more opaque, regardless of one's feelings on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
Materials shared by Somerville for Palestine shed some light on which specific companies the group wants the town to divest from.
One of the group's fliers cites Hewlett-Packard as a business "complicit in Israeli apartheid." The Boston-based public radio station WGBH reports that Hewlett-Packard provides Israel with "an automated biometric identification system [that is] installed at Israeli military checkpoints in the occupied West Bank." According to the activists, the city has awarded the company $1.7 million in school contracts over the past decade, an average of $170,000 per year.
On its website, Somerville for Palestine lists military contractor Lockheed Martin, "1,222 shares of [whose] stock [are] in the Somerville city employee pension fund," and construction equipment firm Caterpillar Inc., whose machinery the group claims "has been widely used for house demolition and settlement construction in the occupied Palestinian territory."
It's unclear how the measure will be effectuated. Somerville for Palestine says on its website that the measure was "non-binding by design—WHEN it passes, Lawmakers are then tasked with implementing it in a lawful and responsible manner."
There's good reason to be concerned about Israel's treatment of Gaza, and Americans who feel this way should put their money where their mouths are and donate to one of the many relief organizations administering humanitarian aid to Palestinian noncombatants. But city officials should invest pension funds in the most prudent manner possible, not base their investment strategies on who has put in orders for Caterpillar equipment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Am guessing this town votes for Liz Warren with similar numbers.
Would say the town should adopt a bunch of Palestinians, but they’ll just come north and cause problems here.
>City officials should spend and invest public funds in the most prudent manner possible.
Why do you hate democracy Nicastro?
You guys whine that everything should be handled at the most local level possible - then you whine when the locals vote for the wrong policies or the wrong people.
Their town, their policies. Fuck 'em.
>There's good reason to be concerned about Israel's treatment of Gaza,
Is there, Jack? And what reason is that? Or are you just parroting back whatever nonsense phrases your progressive allies spout so, when you're old enough to drink, they'll invite you to their cocktail parties.
Pick a fucking lane, dude. If you're going to pretend to be libertarian for an article, stay on topic. This sort of obnoxious virtue signalling is fish in a barrel.
You can address irrelevant concerns elsewhere. Don't cowtow to the same type of political/religious garbage behaviors and phrases as the people you are criticizing.
Fuck the quality of journalism in the world has fallen.
Hey, did you guys know that the right has a huge Nazi problem?