America's $30 Trillion Publicly Held Debt Is 42 Times Larger Than It Was in 1980
Democrats defend every entitlement and dream up new benefits. Republicans demand more defense spending and still more tax cuts.
 
			In 1980, America's publicly held debt reached more than $712 billion (about $2.8 trillion in 2025 dollars), or roughly 25 percent of annual U.S. gross domestic product (GDP). Today, that figure is a little over $30 trillion, or around 100 percent of GDP. And as the federal debt grew 42 times larger over that span, the economy grew only tenfold. You can't expand the numerator four times faster than the denominator for 45 years without courting economic danger.
That's where we find ourselves. The U.S. is at peace, and despite President Donald Trump's claims, there's no national emergency. And yet we've only seen debt as a higher share of GDP during the years of 1945, 1946, 2020, and 2021. Then, Republicans and Democrats knew to scale back. Now, debt explodes during emergencies and continues to grow in peacetime.
In 1946, after World War II, debt-to-GDP was 106 percent. It declined to just 25 percent by 1980, not only because of inflation and economic growth but because of real fiscal discipline. With budgets nearly balanced, the fruits of a booming private sector could actually reduce the burden. Beginning in the Reagan era, discipline gave way to a new normal of chronic budget deficits.
Three forces made the shift possible.
First, and the main cause of the mess we are in, is that the entitlement state became enormous yet untouchable. The Social Security reforms of 1983 are a rare example of bipartisan structural reform of a major entitlement program in U.S. history. Since then, despite economic and societal changes, the program has never been reformed. Never mind that it faces insolvency and the potential for automatic benefit cuts of more than 20 percent in 2033. The same is true of our other major debt driver: Medicare. And Medicaid is growing far beyond its original intent.
Democrats, occasionally helped by Republicans, have worked to expand welfare programs meant for lower-income people to those in higher and higher income brackets. The most recent and extreme example is the COVID-19–era expansion of the Obamacare tax credit to wealthier taxpayers, a significant share of whom enjoy early retirement. The fight over its continuation is what the government shutdown is about.
Second, Republicans discovered that promising tax cuts without offsetting spending cuts was politically painless so long as one claims that they "pay for themselves." There is one rare and recent exception: this year's "One Big Beautiful Bill," which included $1.5 trillion in spending reductions over 10 years to offset some of the tax cuts. It's not enough, but it's something. Meanwhile, the Democrats love to claim that debt wouldn't be a problem if the rich paid their "fair share." They already do pay an enormous amount in taxes. But the numbers still don't add up.
Finally, the Federal Reserve, starting under then-Chairman Alan Greenspan in 1987, learned how to anesthetize the political pain of budget deficits by keeping interest rates artificially low and monetizing debt. Politicians concluded that they could borrow endlessly without suffering political consequences. The problem is that this only works insofar as investors don't worry that they will be paid back with inflated dollars.
That illusion has vanished. Interest costs have surged from $372 billion annually just a few years ago to nearly $1 trillion today, surpassing what we spend on defense or Medicaid. Within a decade, yearly interest payments are projected to nearly double, reaching $1.8 trillion. Even without new programs, the built-in deficit would keep rising and outpace economic growth. And Washington keeps adding more deficit spending.
This decade's bipartisan binge has debt on track for 166 percent of GDP by 2054. I don't think we will actually reach that point, because inflation will break out and stabilize the debt. That would destabilize the country and inflict enormous amounts of pain and lost purchasing power. So, my point remains: Politicians on the left and right see that the debt is exploding and are doing nothing.
The current politics of this crisis are as bipartisan as its origins. Democrats defend every entitlement and dream up new benefits. Republicans demand more defense spending and still more tax cuts. Both claim that faster growth will somehow erase the arithmetic, but growth alone can't close a structural gap this large.
Even sustained 3 percent real annual growth—a questionable assumption given the implications of an aging population and crackdown on immigration—would produce about $4.4 trillion in extra revenue over a decade, while total deficits will total $21.7 trillion.
Don't be fooled: The debt explosion is not driven by waste, fraud, or foreign aid. Nor is it the result of a lack of revenue. It's the direct result of reckless promises to retirees, the cost of health care, and an unwillingness to pay the bills honestly. For most of American history, debt fell when wars ended and peace returned. Since 1980, we've managed the opposite: peace without prudence and prosperity without restraint.
COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
 
				 
				 
				
End all govt welfare programs. Close all foreign military bases. Cut the War Department. Stop giving govt money to foreign nations.
Did you just tell an obese child to stop eating sweets?
*** SNICKERS * **
You criticized Republicans and didn't criticize Democrats hard enough. That means you're a leftist which makes whatever Trump does ok.
This is just sad at this point. Just live in your rank hypocrisy and leftist belief systems. Everyone already knows what you are.
Poor sarc. No ideas™ .
For sarc, it is principals not principles.
Democrats defend every entitlement and dream up new benefits. Republicans demand more defense spending and still more tax cuts.
Want to compare spending costs with entitlements and benefits compared to defense?
And fuck you for calling tax cuts extensions more cuts. Stop demanding more taxes. Tax revenue goes up every fucking year.
entitlements and benefits (87%) compared to defense (13%).
The US government needs to stop running a deficit. It is spending money now on ourselves while sticking future generations with the bill. Unfortunately a balanced budget is something neither the Ds nor the Rs care about.
That’s some deep thinking right there.
+1 Tony
Tony wants to double the tax rate.
Keep selling the BOAF SIDEZ!!!
...because of course DOGE just doesn't exist.
BDR has to be the biggest “Libertarians for Tax Increases” cheerleader in history.
All onboard with sunsetting Trumps tax teductions
Hasn’t met a tax hike yet she doesn’t like - except tariffs
I mean, she’s all for taxing work and investments more, just not consumption and buying foreign.
I'm stocking up on bushel baskets. I saw that documentary on the Weimar Republic.
Problem is that digital money leaks out of baskets and wheelbarrows.
What Happened? [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] happened.
And the numbers look exactly the same as every socialist-riddled nation.
'Guns' (Gov-Guns) don't make sh*t.
The Social Security reforms of 1983 are a rare example of bipartisan structural reform of a major entitlement program in U.S. history.
I hate that that reform created the third-rail resistance to any future reform. The real problem was that the extra FICA taxes were put into a trust fund that could only invest in Treasuries. Worse than insane. It could have been used to purchase assets. Instead it purchases govts own liabilities. Incenting both D's and R's to sell bad ideas - and voters to hold no one accountable.
The other problem which is never mentioned is our decision to be the reserve currency. 1980 is a convenient starting point to see the cost graphically. Volcker did what a reserve currency in a floating exchange-rate world requires. Jack up interest rates to create a deep recession that kills off domestic manufacturing and that ensures a global demand for that currency at whatever cost. From then, 'trade' is more about exporting dollars than importing/exporting 'stuff'. The economy changes to blowing bubbles.
In 1980, the cumulative current account from 1947 to then was a slight surplus - $300 billion dollars. Add another $60 billion until that recession ended in 1982.
Since then there have been two quarters of current account surplus. The cumulative current account deficits since then - $68 TRILLION. That's a lot of demand from banks for dollars to export overseas and grow their balance sheet. Demand for govt debt.