Don't Get a Nazi Tattoo or Praise Hitler: Advice for New Politicians
Graham Platner's excuses aren't exactly persuasive.
Graham Platner is a 41-year-old oyster farmer and Marine veteran who is running to be the Democratic Party's Maine Senate nominee. A political outsider, he would face incumbent Republican Susan Collins in the general election if he managed to prevail against establishment Democrat Janet Mills, the current governor, aged 77.
You are reading Free Media from Robby Soave and Reason. Get more of Robby's on-the-media, disinformation, and free speech coverage.
Until this week, Platner had a lot going for him. He is a left populist endorsed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) with some natural talent for effective political communication, i.e., he sounds like a normal person. At a time of extreme dissatisfaction with Democratic leadership and the nominees they have managed to recruit, a charismatic outsider with a working-class background could be just what the party ordered. Plus, he's decades younger than his primary opponent, Mills, who would be the oldest freshman senator in U.S. history.
But there's a problem: Platner has a Nazi tattoo—or at least one that closely resembles a Nazi tattoo.
I'll admit I approached this story with a great deal of initial skepticism. That's because I still remember the time that Talia Lavin, then a fact-checker (oops) for The New Yorker, wrongly accused a wheelchair-bound ICE agent—also a Marine veteran—of having a Nazi tattoo. Also, the mainstream media loves to dubiously accuse people of expressing cryptic Nazi gestures. Remember the kids flashing the okay sign? Elon Musk's alleged Nazi salute?
Did Elon Musk do a Nazi salute? pic.twitter.com/PPGkLvsclU
— Robby Soave (@robbysoave) January 21, 2025
Platner's hideously bad tattoo is a skull and crossbones, which is something I associate with pirates but is apparently also a Nazi thing, depending on its exact size and shape. When deployed by Nazis, it's called the Totenkopf. You will note that in this version the skull is bigger relative to the crossbones and appears over them.
That is, in fact, the version that Platner had tattooed across his chest while on leave in Croatia in 2007. His story is this: He got really drunk with his buddies, stumbled into a tattoo parlor, and picked something random that looked cool. He had no idea it was a Nazi thing, he told Pod Save America.
Up until this point, I was pretty much on board with his explanation. But here's the problem: According to Jewish Insider, he told at least one acquaintance about the tattoo and referred to it as "my totenkopf." This makes it much less likely that he never understood the connection.
Anyway, Platner has addressed the controversy by covering up the tattoo with a new, very ugly one.
Years ago I got a skull and crossbones tattoo with my buddies in the Marine Corps.
I was appalled to learn it closely resembled a Nazi symbol. I altered it yesterday, into something that isn't deeply offensive to my core beliefs.
I am very sorry to all of you who had to… pic.twitter.com/RQSiRsrTiC
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) October 22, 2025
Leftist commentators are really, really mad that the mainstream media has turned this kerfuffle into a thing, giving establishment Democrats an excuse to coalesce behind Mills. "The reason anyone pretends to care about Platner's tattoo and Reddit posts is because they think he's coming for the rich," wrote Matt Stoller on X, in histrionic fashion. "That's it. That's all it's about. They hate populists because we actually believe in equality and that terrifies them."
I don't know about that. It's true that cancel culture can be pretty perverse, and we don't want to live in a world where the only people who can successfully run for office are weird sociopaths who have practiced never doing or saying anything controversial since age seven. If Platner had drunkenly gotten a bad tattoo, realized his mistake, and covered it up years ago, I would probably want to excuse it, too. But he's had it for 18 years, and apparently seemed aware of the Nazi connection. That does seem sort of bad.
And it would be especially hypocritical for the Democratic coalition—politicians, activists, the media—to excuse this while simultaneously pursuing efforts to expose Young Republicans who praised Hitler (sometimes, arguably in jest) in group chats, which I covered in last week's newsletter.
This Week on Free Media
I am joined by Amber Duke, and later this week, Andrew Heaton, to discuss the big stories: No Kings protests, the New York City mayoral race, and more. Subscribe to the Free Media channel on YouTube.
Worth Watching
I have just finished another Agatha Christie book, The Secret of Chimneys. It was a good one! (I correctly guessed one of the approximately three twists.) I would certainly recommend it to first-time Christie readers. Next up for me: I've decided to read The Terror by Dan Simmons. I first became interested in this one after catching an episode of the AMC series it inspired. It's a heavily fictionalized version of the true disappearances of Terror and Erebus, two British ships that vanished while searching for the Northwest Passage in the 1840s. I'm a big fan of Arctic (and Antarctic) horror, so I'm really looking forward to this one.
And speaking of Arctic horror, I'm pleased to report that my own novel—an original work of science fiction/fantasy set in an icy, northern kingdom—is actually coming along nicely. I've already written about 35,000 words, and have completed one of three major plot arcs that comprise the story. That's decent progress, given that I started it a month ago. The key is to force myself to write something every single day: a sentence, a page, a chapter, anything.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Nothing says "trust me, I will be a thoughtful and considering senator" like using "I was drunk and out of my mind and have no idea of history" as an excuse for sporting a Nazi tattoo.
He will win the election regardless.
Democrats. Do. Not. Care. What. They. Lecture. You. About.
I think he still has to win the primary first, which is probably a bigger hurdle now.
Hes up 38 on mills in primary polling.
If he was the only Dem they would still vote for him because they don't care if he's a Nazi. But they do care if he wins, so they'll vote for the 80 year old woman instead.
He was a young Marine on leave, it does kind of track.
Why couldn’t he be like the other Marines and eat crayons while shoving vodka soaked tampons up his ass (that really happened per Donut Operator)?
He had 18 years since and was in such a rush to only fix it now got a completely retarded cover up of his choice then.
How many Marines out of a 1000 do you think have Nazi symbol tattoos?
Guy is a leftist so the Nazi idolization tracks.
Also true, but most self-described leftists falsely believe their ideology is opposite that rather than closely aligned.
Not gonna lie, it's very believable. I could buy he didn't know the meaning (I wouldn't) and was appalled when he learned. It still could have held sentimental value for people or experiences on deployment.
Or he could have been/is a NAZI.
Either way, the real story sounds interesting. If it's the former then idgaf about it as a scandal regardless of his politics.
This is not a problem for team D. They had KKK exalted cyclops Robert Byrd (D) in the senate for a while. Hillary once referred to Byrd as a mentor of hers.
No doubt that SSqrlsy would sprinkle on himself if this nazi branded Democratic Party member got elected.
They hate populists because we actually believe in equality...
Equality does not mean going after the rich. Equality means we all have the same chance to apply our talents and make as much or as little money as possible without government telling me how to run my business, picking winners and losers, or coming after my money that I was able to earn and you were not because you suck.
Well, that depends on whether you are talking about equality of opportunity or equality of outcome.
equality of outcome
Now they're calling that "equity".
Given political rhetoric today, everybody also gets "2 men = 1 man + 1 woman", identity, white-supremacist, mathematical *equality* crammed into one of their front holes too. Whether they like it or not.
Sure, mathematicians are careful to explicitly and clearly delineate equations from identity and balance all the way back to Al-Khwarizmi, but fuck that racist bullshit.
The Terror book is objectively 12 Billion times better than the TV show. The show completely chickened out on the supernatural aspects.
The totenkopf is not necessarily a Nazi symbol. It was used by the Prussian 2nd Life Hussars Regiment in the Franco-Prussian War in the 1870s. It most well-known member was Field Marshal August von Mackensen who was an important field commander in WW I.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_von_Mackensen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VKYp0U01p0
That emblem was appropriated by the SS in the WWII era though and that is where it is mostly remembered today.
The National Socialists "appropriated" the swastika, too, and now basically it's just National Socialists who use it. Sucks, but there it is, may as well face reality.
And nobody calls it "the Charlie Chaplin mustache" either.
I was merely pointing that there is a good deal more history behind it than just Nazi era stuff.
It's not just Nazis that use skulls.
I understand that it's a particular type of skull.
Of course, some people say their people have been using the swastika for legitimate purposes for a long time before Hitler.
https://cohna.org/swastika-is-not-hakenkreuz/
It doesn’t fit this was via the lesser known etymology from WW1 era where Croatia was part of the Austro-Hungarian empire, a member of the Centrals Powers that included von Mackensen’s imperial Germany, but the southern Slavs generally wanted to break from Vienna. Croatia was part of the Axis during the sequel war.
There are many different versions of the Totenkopf with some differences in how exactly they are drawn. His tattoo was specifically of a version used by the SS between 1939 and 1945.
It's a fucking pirate flag. Everybody calm down.
He said it was a totenkopf. It's not a pirate flag. Stop gaslighting.
Dubious unnamed sources are alleged to have heard him say that five years after he got the tattoo, which even if true does not mean he was aware of that meaning at the time he got it. Stop being so gullible.
Of course it's not necessarily a Nazi symbol. The word is simply the German word for skull. And yes it is also used for 'skull and crossbones' or 'skull and bones' because the literal German translation for that is 'totenkopf und gekreuzte Knochen' which is way too German even for Germans.
Militaries everywhere have used the skull since forever. Including the Marines who have used it repeatedly from at least WW2 to today
Even the ADL which puts Totenkopf on a page titled Hate Symbol: Totenkopf explains in the details "Totenkopf" is German for "death's head" or skull and typically refers to a skull-and-crossbones image....It is this particular image (the SS version - and in particular associated with neo-Nazis and white supremacists v say drunken marines who got a tattoo in Croatia) of a skull and crossbones that is considered a hate symbol, not any image of a skull and crossbones.
Is this how you try to explain away your nazi tattoos?
Totenkopf is a generic term for a death's head and come in many styles. Many military units across the world (and the US) use them.
The *specific* for this guy took was the SS one.
I can believe the guy didn't know at the time. I can't believe he didn't find out in the last couple of decades. I could believe that when he found out he kept it as a joke and a reminder to no be an idiot.
Sadly, I can believe he is lying about all that now because he's too much of a coward to stand up for himself.
The drunk tattoo parlor story is bullshit because no self-respecting tattoo artist would put that on someone without telling them what it means first.
It's a fucking pirate flag. Everybody calm down.
He said it was a totenkopf. It's not a pirate flag. Stop gaslighting.
Dubious unnamed sources are alleged to have heard him say that five years after he got the tattoo, which even if true does not mean he was aware of that meaning at the time he got it. Stop being so gullible.
He learned his tattoo was a Nazi symbol and decided to keep it anyway? And you think other people are gullible?
You want to pay for laser tattoo removal?
You can't just wash off a tattoo. Getting rid of (to the extent possible) or covering it are painful and expensive ordeals. It's not surprising he left it alone until it became a retarded controversy.
There are pictures of a tattoo all over the internet.
You're gaslighting people. It's like saying Mickey Mouse and Professor Ratigan are practically identical cartoon rodents.
And I say that as someone whose worked for, with, and around people with all manner of racist and criminal backgrounds and history.
Your dishonesty aids those who want to obfuscate history, shame others, and stupify themselves rather than engage in earnest discussion.
Uhm, a pirate flag *is a totenkopf*!
Nope. The pirate flag is a Jolly Roger and other names further back. Nobody called it a Totenkopf. In the sense that *t*otenkopf means "death's head" it applies to lots of historical symbols, none of which were ever called *T*otenkopf.
This "It's a pirate flag." (self-)induced rhetorical stupidity is as dishonest as the "Maryland Father" horseshit. As I said above, even if you don't know who Professor Ratigan is, pretending nobody can tell the difference between him and Mickey Mouse just makes you look stupid.
Edit: This is literally the same stupid tactic that "The Gadsden Flag is a symbol of white supremacy." libtards engaged in.
He got it in Croatia.
Horseshit. He was in Croatia. It is entirely possible - likely even - that the tattoo parlor guy knew it was an SS tattoo and didn't 'explain anything'. Possible even that that tattoo parlor didn't have a book with dozens of skulls and crossbones examples - with a detailed historical explanation of what each of those mean - and explained it in both Croatian and English to a bunch of drunk Marines.
Two gray boxes, I'm going to assume it is a couple of the local anti-semites running to defend Das Vaterland.
no self-respecting tattoo artist would put that on someone
A respectable tattoo artist would not tattoo someone intoxicated at all, so your comment is irrelevant.
You've never been to the sort of places sailors hang out in, and certainly never been to Eastern Europe.
Nazis are surprisingly popular on the continent.
Yeah, there's definitely a bit of American, maybe even bubble, cultural norms/assumptions being applied there.
I like the hands-in-pockets, "aw shucks, they found out I'm a nazi" pose
As an oyster farmer, he ostensibly shucks a lot.
The only way to digest his argument is to cover it with hot sauce and swallow it whole.
The SHUCLLs approve.
Socialist Hedonists Undercover Cosplaying Liberal Libertines.
Big Akita coined this.
NO ONE associates THAT skull with the skull and crossbones of a pirate.
They are utterly dissimilar. Pretending otherwise is pretending and is obvious to everyone.
You sound like the kind of narrow-minded person that thinks men can't become women.
Until you looked it up on Wikipedia today you would not have known it even existed.
Fuck off. Off the top of my head I'd bet $1000 that it appears at least once in Inglorious Basterds, The Spirit, and in two Indiana Jones movies, and that's blockbuster movies/actors.
B-movies, especially in the exploitation genre, it's probably appeared in hundreds, maybe thousands.
Edit: I don't even have to go see the Mitchell and Webb sketch that got bandied about around here to know that it gets knitted into a sock (FFS, it was a scarf)
Saw the Mark Felton YT video on it (since been taken down due to standards and practices). The video is archived at:
https://archive.org/details/youtube-hG0C3Vezw9Q
is his fucking name even Graham Platner? beat it, loser.
Unmentioned by Robby but significant in denying the "I didn't know it was Nazi symbolism" theory is that he had a second tattoo, this one on his arm not his chest, referencing 1919 which is apparently an important date in Nazi mythology.
As someone who is completely fine with any interpretation of "Good people on both sides." and who has worked for, with, and around all manner of people with dubious tattoos and the social/cultural history to go with them; I'd also note that the fact that the cover up tattoo doesn't actually cover the tattoo.
Again, I 100% believe a marine got drunk and got a tattoo. I 100% believe a Croatian tattoo artist would absolutely tattoo a totenkopf on a drunk American marine. I'm dubious that between then and now, no one asked, mentioned, or pointed out "Hey, is that a Totenkopf?" Similarly, I'm dubious that any modern, American, commercial tattoo artist would do a cover up tattoo, especially if they knew there customer was a Senate nominee running for office, and not at least check that it's OK if the cover up doesn't actually completely cover the tattoo.
If any Republican ran for any office and had anything that vaguely resembled anything that might be a Nazi tattoo we wouldn't be having this conversation because the party would have kicked him to the curb.
Again, Pete Hegseth got raked over the coals because he had a Jerusalem Cross tattoo, which looks vaguely like an Iron Cross. And the Iron Cross, while used by the Nazis, was more notorious for it's use in Germany leading up to and in WW*I* until present day.
SSDD: Here's a pickelhaube (which protected against saber strikes and was discontinued prior to the fall of the Weimar) with an Iron Cross on it's side (as an outlaw biker helmet) for sale on amazon (where this is still as close as you can get to buying a 'Confederate Flag'.
Vaguely similar, but clearly incorrect, symbol or gesture by one side is guilt that must be expunged, but near-photocopy-competent, "They're the same picture" meme, tattoo and, suddenly everybody gets philosophical about how Renaissance poets kept human skulls to remind them of their mortality.
Pete hegseth has three tattoos that invoke killing Muslims for religious reasons including the one you mention. The Jerusalem cross. Where do you think it got it's name. Of course Americans take it for granted that that is exactly the sort of tattoo that the Secy War should have.
Hurr Durr... here's a Totenkopf or death's head from 1790! Are we sure this guy isn't just a really big fan of Monkey D. Luffy and The Straw Hat Pirates?
Can this story get any more sarcasmic?
His story is this: He got really drunk with his buddies, stumbled into a tattoo parlor, and picked something random that looked cool. He had no idea it was a Nazi thing, he told Pod Save America.
https://x.com/ryangrim/status/1980677824999788849