Trump Administration Cancels $700 Million in Biden-Era Energy Contracts for Red States
Despite trims, the Energy Department is still wasting billions.

Earlier this month, the Trump administration announced that it would slash $7.5 billion worth of Joe Biden–era green energy projects in blue states. The cancellation of federal energy spending has now extended to Republican states, too.
On Monday, E&E News reported that the Energy Department had "canceled more than $700 million in battery and manufacturing awards" in the second week of October. This swath includes grants for "Ascend Elements, American Battery Technology Co., Anovion and ICL Specialty Products," and "glass manufacturer LuxWall," per E&E. All of these companies had plans to break ground on projects in states that voted for President Donald Trump in the last presidential election.
Ascend, the largest grant recipient of the group, specializes in creating cathodes—the positive electrode in lithium-ion batteries—out of used batteries. In 2022, the company was awarded over $316 million by the Energy Department to build a facility in Hopkinsville, Kentucky, to scale up Ascend's cathode production. Of this total, $206 million has already been spent, meaning that the Energy Department's announcement only affects a little over $110 million.
The other grantees were awarded money for similar projects. Anovion was given $117 million to build a facility in Alabama to produce synthetic graphite for lithium-ion batteries, and ICL was awarded $197 million to construct a facility in Missouri to make phosphate powder for these batteries.
American Battery Technologies, meanwhile, was awarded a $57.7 million federal grant in 2022 to develop a commercial-grade cathode material facility in Nevada. The company was then awarded $123 million in 2024 to build another facility, but this grant wasn't affected by the recent cancellation. LuxWall, the only company on the list that doesn't specialize in battery materials, lost federal funding for a vacuum-insulated window facility in Detroit, which was expected to improve energy efficiency in buildings.
The termination of these grants is a win for taxpayers. All of these projects "had missed milestones, and it was determined they did not adequately advance the nation's energy needs, were not economically viable, and would not provide a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars," an Energy Department spokesman told E&E. The announcement builds on other spending cuts at the agency, including $5 billion worth of green energy loan cancellations in May.
While these efforts might signal fiscal restraint, federal spending has increased under Trump, and the Energy Department has traded much of Biden's green energy spending for its own wasteful initiatives. Since Trump's return to office, the federal government has taken stakes in several mineral firms, approved millions of dollars' worth of coal bailouts, continued subsidizing nuclear power, and finalized a loan for a multistate transmission line project.
Still, the administration deserves credit for the little spending it has cut. With global demand for lithium-ion batteries to power energy storage and electric vehicles expected to grow through 2030, these projects never needed the backing of the federal government to survive, a fact that is supported by American Batteries' recent Securities and Exchange Commission filing. As E&E reports, the firm said that "regardless" of whether the funding rescission is reversed, "the Company intends to move forward with the project without impact to timeline or scope."
The $700 million cut could be the tip of the iceberg. The Energy Department has reportedly outlined $20 billion worth of energy projects (including the $700 million announced) that could get the ax, but it's unclear if it'll move forward with canceling this funding. Doing so might upset the politicians who are fighting the agency on these cuts, but it would be a welcome step in reversing the government's yearslong intervention in America's energy sector.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Weird article to not mention dem lawsuits and inferior judges blocking all the cuts, even ones passed by congress in the BBB.
$700 million out of $7 billion is at least a start.
I don't think we have to worry about the inferior court judges blocking these cuts, since they're in red states. Unless they're in blue areas / enclaves of red states.
My issue with the article is the framing. Biden auto penned fy25. Trump has tried cutting. He got reconciliation through, cant touch this spending. He has worked woth the house on numerous recission bills that dems vote against and freeze up. Reason actually attacked DOGE and audits trying to find cuts.
Yet this article now claims he hasn't cut enough, even after attacking him for every attempt.
Abolishing everything apparently requires a lot of agreeing-to-disagree, deference to hand-picked #resistance federal district court judges and a Libertarian Moment that somehow captures the hearts and minds of every Democrat, Republican and Independent currently serving in the Senate and Congress.
It's simple Jesse, Orange Man Bad.
https://tenor.com/view/special-ed-special-gif-14524557650897979460
The expected growth in demand for lithium batteries could be mitigated by the end of EV subsidies. And if the Trump administration is promoting fossil and nuclear energy and upgrading the grid it seems preferable to me.
By this time next year it will be interesting to see if Reason apologizes for this years attacks and actually says yes, Trump did accomplish a reduction in spending and help right the wrongs brought by the democrats.
That would require Trump to lead a professional and responsible administration. But that will never happen. Whatever "wrongs" you think the Ds did, Trump's chaos and authoritarianism is far far worse.
Typical *pointless* leftard chicken-pecking attack.
Suddenly congress isnt involved Tony?
Now put your mask back on and stay inside for the next two weeks.
If you like these green projects, fund them yourself.
Excellent!
And that my friends is why we elected Trump.
The biggest difference between an [R] and a [D] is [R]'s don't want to make their living off of taxpayers (i.e. STEALING from those 'icky' people)
Is it still bad that he's cutting wasteful spending?
Oh, so it wasn’t just partisan skullduggery after all.
Wonder if this will give staff pause the next time their outrage suddenly jumps to 100.