Alabama Police Arrest 61-Year-Old Woman in Penis Costume at No Kings Protest
Police officers took Jeana Gamble to the ground on the side of the road because they found her costume "obscene."

October 18 saw numerous "No Kings" protests across the country, reportedly encompassing 2,700 events and 7 million demonstrators. Reason's own Nick Gillespie observed the demonstration in New York City, where he found "fully peaceful protesters who hate President Donald Trump with intensity but not much specificity."
Media coverage noted how smoothly the proceedings went. One place that did see police action was the town of Fairhope, Alabama, where multiple officers arrested 61-year-old Jeana Gamble for wearing an inflatable penis costume and holding a sign that said "No Dick-Tator." While the situation sounds funny, the arrest is a violation of the First Amendment by prudish police and public officials.
"An officer observed an individual in a phallic costume near the Baldwin Square Shopping Center," the Fairhope Police Department posted on Facebook. "The officer approached the woman and requested that she remove the costume, which is deemed obscene in a public setting; however, she refused to comply." As a result, Gamble was arrested and "charged with Disorderly Conduct and Resisting Arrest, both of which are misdemeanor charges."
That statement puts it mildly. As video posted to social media demonstrates, officers took Gamble to the ground by a busy road, handcuffed her, and dragged her to her feet. As onlookers protested the arrest, one officer shouted back, "I'm not gonna have somebody out here dressed like this!"
#NoKings event in Fairhope, Al.
A woman was arrested for "lewd conduct" because she was dressed in penis suit with a sign that said "No dick-tator"
3 cops on a 53 yo woman.— thekoolaidmom.bsky.social (@thekoolaidmom.bsky.social) October 18, 2025 at 5:01 PM
"This type of behavior or display is not acceptable and will not be tolerated in Fairhope," Mayor Sherry Sullivan told 1819 News, a conservative Alabama news site. "Protests should remain peaceful and free of profanity and obscene displays." The site added that Sullivan "confirmed [Gamble] was first asked to leave the parade and was ultimately arrested."
"She crossed the line from freedom of expression to obscenity," Fairhope Police Lieutenant Shane Nolte told the local NBC affiliate.
Sullivan and Nolte are completely wrong, as was the arresting officer who told onlookers he wouldn't allow someone to be "dressed like this" in public.
Wearing a costume, whether or not the mayor likes it, is a peaceful act, and police haven't indicated that Gamble was doing anything while protesting to justify police attention.
As to Sullivan's argument that protests should be "free of profanity and obscene displays," that is also wrong. Regardless of whether anyone took issue with Gamble's costume or the word dick on her sign, both are within her First Amendment rights.
In Cohen v. California (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court heard the case of Paul Cohen, who was arrested after wearing a jacket that said "Fuck the Draft" into a Los Angeles courthouse, protesting conscription and the Vietnam War. He was convicted of disturbing the peace and sentenced to 30 days in jail. The Supreme Court overturned Cohen's conviction, finding that absent some other offense, the state cannot "make the simple public display here involved of this single four-letter expletive a criminal offense."
"The constitutional right of free expression is powerful medicine in a society as diverse and populous as ours," Justice John Harlan wrote for the 5–4 majority, adding that "while the particular four-letter word being litigated here is perhaps more distasteful than most others of its genre, it is nevertheless often true that one man's vulgarity is another's lyric."
The same applies to the costume itself. "If you have a police officer going around telling people to remove costumes he thinks are offensive, you have speech police," Adam Steinbaugh, an attorney with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, posted on Bluesky. "And the department and city officials are defending it!"
"Alabamians have the right to protest peacefully and to expect their government, including law enforcement, to respect those rights," Indivisible Baldwin County, the protest's organizers, said in a statement. "People should not be subject to violent overreach by police just because they exercise their right to free speech in ways that are controversial or impolite. Speech, but only in ways the opponents of a message approve, is not free speech at all."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What a dick!
She was a one-eyed snake.
The post wall boomer no longer gets dick inside of her, so she thought she’d reverse that and get inside of a dick.
Sounds cocky.
Sadly the Democrats were unable to maintain an election.
Electile dysfunction.
Nothing but a bunch of CUCLLs.
(I coined that)
What a wiener.
This going to come to a head sooner or later.
We're hard up here for puns.
She's clearly been taking too many blue pills.
Wow, could this be Reason's first bluesky tweet? ENB hasn't posted anything to the best of my knowledge.
Comments don't count, right? I'm pretty sure I've posted a link to Bluesky's greates hit page before.
Though, I must admit Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression posting on Bluesky is about as good. Guess there's not a lot of civil rights work to be done on college campuses these days.
LOL, there are fewer users engaged in your free speech platform *daily* than there are CS2 players *currently*.
F
Is it not obscene?
Why does her age matter? Did the police know what it was? That she was even a woman? (Whatever that means, these days)
If you support a law, you shoudl be willing to accept police will...
Really, you are right, if your obscenity laws ban a penis costume I question the point of these laws. Nobody is actually harmed by seeing a costume like this [no, not even an OMG CHILD.]
If your argument is that we should get rid of obscenity laws altogether, I would agree with you. But know that the vast majority of US adults disagree with us.
If your argument is that we should selectively non-enforce those laws on just this one person because reasons, I disagree strongly. Even bad laws need to be consistently enforced. That's the only way we'll ever build up the political pressure to fix them.
It is also the only way to maintain any veneer of legitimacy. When the laws are unenforced, enforced haphazardly, sporadically (see quota stops), or maliciously (to punish some while ignoring infractions of others) the laws and the entire law enforcement system loses respect and legitimacy.
Prosecutorial discretion should only apply to refusing to enforce, at all, bad or unconstitutional laws. Prosecutors should not be allowed to choose to prosecute accused X but not accused Y for the same crime because "reasons."
^Yup^
Yes, this. And Reason consistently wants to let leftists get away with breaking laws while never giving a shit when people on the right are treated the same.
If your argument is that we should get rid of obscenity laws altogether, I would agree with you. But know that the vast majority of US adults disagree with us.
I guess "Everyone else is wrong except for the one person who agrees with me." acknowledges your authoritarianism up front.
I can understand how an inflatable penis costume should, in some, even many, minds fall on the side of crude humor or bad taste rather than harmful obscenity. At the same time, I've seen movies worse than I Spit On Your Grave and The Last House On The Left (the 70s versions) and can understand that not only would open public broadcast of those materials serve no merit, the lowering of standards of obscenity to accommodate them only creates a race to the bottom.
Look honey there's Big Bird!
(child squeals with delight)
And there's Elmo!
(childish laughter) Which one is that mommy?
Ask your father.
And what did you learn from the "No Kings" protest?
Don't walk around in public dressed like a dick.
Someone should tell our senior Senator.
Remember when Trump got caught on a hot mic in a private conversation talking about pussy grabbing and it was de facto conduct unbecoming of someone serving the public?
Once again and as usual, the 1A says "Congress shall make no law..." not "Anyone has the right to do what they want, where they want and call it speech."
IMO, if the Fairhope PD wants to remove you from the scene, escort you home, and warn you that if you come back wearing that you'll be arrested and charged as if you were a man walking around naked, I don't see the slightest problem with it.
Call me back when the AL State Senate is passing a law banning inflatable penis costumes.
What do you get when you cross a penis with a potato and an ocean liner?
Trump.
The biggest ocean liner of all time. The most luxurious one ever made.
A tanker of titanic proportions, filled with dicks and taters.
I’d strongly recommend you two dorks keep your fifty cent day jobs.
Hannah Gatsby is funnier than you two sadly.
Hey look it’s Lying Jeffy the racist!
Demjeff the bigly big bigot bot might let you play with his man titties for that.
Drumpf!
HAHAHAHA!
With a nod to South Park, I'd hazard a guess that the penis was grossly oversized for the man it was intended to represent.
You cunts cheered years long sentences nationwide manhunts and solitary confinement for people that got an unauthorized guided tour so sorry, I won't care about some commie grandma who was acting a fool. She's just lucky she didn't get shot in the face.
"You're a hypocrite. That makes this ok. Because right and wrong are determined by you being a hypocrite, you hypocrite. Some federal agent should have killed the bitch. That's what she deserved. Anyone who says otherwise celebrates Babbitt's murder."
So, uh, Sarc, should she be shot dead for trespassing?
But youre admitting to be a hypocrite right? You even defended the j6 prosecutions against non violent people last week. As long as you admit youre a hypocrite I dont care.
And you defended and celebrated her murder. You said officer Byrd was justified in a blind shoot. Need your post?
A federal court just ruled that it's cool to expel a couple of middle school kids for wearing Let's Go Brandon t shirts. Why? Because observers might translate the phrase into an obscenity. It's kind of a flaccid argument to claim that this is a particularly grave assault on liberty. There are a lot of dicks in the story and they're not all cops.
'Flaccid' is exactly the adjective to use in the light of the article.
Fire every cop involved including the semi-ambulatory doughnut at the front desk who entered in her information.
This is a slam dunk in court. Hopefully she wasn't hurt in the takedown, and cheers to the million dollar 1A lawsuit.
Speaking of peaceful people wearing costumes at 'No Kings' rallies: Behold the tolerant Left:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmPgTYYn56s
Ha Ha. This is what you do when you realize you are useless to society. Attack someone in a costume.
Seriously I hope this guy doesn't ever get into the Oxford Union.
Ill bet this women was all for the lock downs, mask mandates and arresting those who broke them,
I would modify the costume to keep the penis and put two photographed heads on it -- the arresting officer's and the nayor's -- then wear it to the next city council meeting daring the city to make an arrest.
I don't get it. A "No Kings" protest would be much more appropriate if they were protesting Joe Biden.
She could have avoided offending the delicate sensibilities of those cops while keeping the sign (with a minor spelling change), by dressing up as Mr. Potato Head with a bright red tie and an orange wig. (A tip of the hat to the late, great Kinky Friedman for the general idea). The visibility would have been better, too, with more than one eye.
Alabama Police Arrest 61-Year-Old Woman in Penis Costume at No Kings Protest
So... she was on the younger side of the protesters...
You know it's funny, I was thinking about Gil Scott Heron's "The Revolution will not be televised" and I realized how wrong he was.
The revolution literally... literally will be sponsored by Xerox. It will be starring current Hollywood stars, it will be brought to you in 4 parts without commercial interruption, NBC will predict the winner and the count in 29 districts, there will be pictures of police shooting down brothers in instant replay, there swill be slow motion or still life pictures of current day celebrities strolling through Watts in a red, black and green jumpsuit he had been saving for just the right occasion, there will be highlights on the eleven o'clock news and pictures of hairy-armed women liberationists and current-day wealthy women of power blowing their noses. The revolution will be right back after a message from their sponsors.. It will be streamed live and it will be brough to you by Pfizer.
I have to confess, I didn't even know Cory Booker was still a thing in 2025.
I'm pretty grossed by it, and I am pretty sure I don't know anyone who would wear something this...prurient.
But when you have a president who's a dick, this is what you get. It figures that it's Alabama, the only think missing was her cousin wearing a vagina hat.