Libertarian Candidates Test America's Growing Discontent With the Two-Party System
These two campaigns won’t break the system—but they hint at a country finally ready to try.

As frustration with the American political establishment continues to soar across the country and public trust in the two-party system reaches historic lows, independent and third-party candidates are moving to fill that void in state races nationwide.
In New Jersey, residents are preparing to vote in what is one of the most competitive gubernatorial races of the year's election cycle. The race's two frontrunners, Rep. Mikie Sherrill (D–N.J.) and former state Rep. Jack Ciattarelli (R–Hillsborough), are locked in a head-to-head race to succeed incumbent Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy.
Sherrill maintains a six-point lead over Ciattarelli, according to a new poll from Quinnipiac University, but Libertarian Party candidate Vic Kaplan is hoping to disrupt the race.
"I am different from other candidates," Kaplan told WHYY, Philadelphia's NPR affiliate. "I offer proposals that would improve the lives of the people of New Jersey."
Kaplan, who is polling just over 1 percent according to the Quinnipiac survey, emphasizes a pragmatic slate of reforms centered on decentralization and municipal autonomy, arguing that local governments—not state bureaucracies—are best equipped to meet residents' needs.
Kaplan's platform includes energy deregulation, repealing the state's Certificate of Need laws, which force health care facilities to receive government permission before they begin construction or renovation, and supporting legislation that limits local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. He also seeks to expand affordable housing by easing zoning laws and strengthening private property rights by ending the government's practice of using eminent domain to seize property without the owner's permission.
While lowering taxes is central to his campaign—he calls for phasing out New Jersey's income and sales taxes within four years and replacing them with local revenue and user fees—Kaplan diverges from conventional libertarian views in his support for safety-net programs like Medicaid, which could appeal to some moderate and liberal voters.
Over 1,000 miles away, Thomas Laehn, another Libertarian Party candidate, is running for Iowa's open federal Senate seat, hoping to tap into voters' growing distrust of both major parties.
Laehn, who describes himself as a "populist" on his campaign website, was elected as the attorney of rural Greene County in 2017—and again in 2021—and is the first Libertarian Party candidate to hold a partisan office in Iowa history. He's running on a platform that includes decriminalizing marijuana, ensuring a secure and humane border policy, reducing the national debt, and strengthening private property rights by opposing eminent domain.
To Laehn, the campaign isn't a traditional partisan challenge but an effort to disrupt the American partisan paradigm. "Both parties have worked tirelessly to take power away from the people and concentrate it into their own hands," he states on his website. "I am not running against a Democrat or a Republican; I am running against the two-party system itself."
Both Laehn and Kaplan face steep structural hurdles, such as limited fundraising networks and the enduring belief that third-party votes are wasted. Kaplan must stand out in New Jersey's crowded field, while Laehn confronts Iowa's entrenched partisan loyalties, shaped by decades of Republican control in rural areas and Democratic strength in cities. Still, both are betting that widespread frustration and the rise of independent voters will help them break through the noise and surpass the Libertarian Party's typical 1 percent to 2 percent ceiling. Both candidates seem less concerned with winning their elections than with turning voter disaffection into a lasting political force.
Their campaigns also reflect a quiet shift within Libertarian Party politics. After years dominated by ideological purity—intensified by the party's 2022 Mises Caucus takeover—Kaplan and Laehn represent a turn toward running candidates with a more voter-focused approach. Their brand of libertarianism appears to emphasize civic empowerment and local reform over abstract theory, meeting disillusioned voters where they are. Though their chances of victory are slim, their performance could signal how third-party politics might evolve in an era when voters care less about loyalty and more about limiting centralized power.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Third parties, their candidates, and their supporters can bitch and moan all they want about their votes being wasted, because their votes are wasted under the current system. This is another reason why we need to go to proportional representation. Third parties will be able to get seats without winning the majority of the votes in any election.
The Constitution was not designed, and as we are seeing, fails under a two party system.
Let me guess, your PhD is in entomology? That would explain your reported expertise in buggery.
"Proportional" representation is a cure that's far worse than the disease. Proportional representation wrongly assumes that voters are voting for parties instead of representatives. Proportional representation works in comparatively small parliamentary systems. The US is neither small nor parliamentary.
I would not call India, Germany, Indonesia, Japan, and Mexico comparatively small populations. And people do vote party instead of individual. The vast majority of Americans don't know who their representative is. The US system is so broken it has brought us fascism. That is a pretty bad disease.
Dr retard argues most people are as retarded as he is to push political desires.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it."
You are not smart.
"Molly is retarded"
If the LP runs another inexperienced Obama twink that bent the knee to covid fascism then socially messaged he did so, it will remain a two party system.
Vic Kaplan.
Immigration
Vic will enforce the US Constitution on New Jersey soil by making the presence of ICE null and void (Article I, Section VIII of the US Constitution only mentions "naturalization" (citizenship) as a federal power). Vic supports the passage of the Immigration Trust Act in the State Legislature that codifies the State government non-cooperation into law. Due process rights for all people on New Jersey soil have to be protected. Learn more
Vic opposes the collectivism of bigotry that comes from the targeting and scapegoating of undocumented migrants.
Open borders nut.
Vic will protect the environment by enforcing the "polluter pays principle" and property rights to control pollution. Learn more
Eco nut.
Housing
Vic supports the idea of using the abandoned residential and commercial buildings to provide housing for the homeless. Affordable housing will lead to less homelessness. Learn more
Ummm..
https://www.ballotready.org/people/vic-kaplan#housing
Where does he stand on castration of minors? Chemicals only or is surgery cool too. Chase articulated the Big L party line but it's a tent
A field hospital surgery tent?
When he thought about the kids, he pitched a tent.
Didn't the green party candidate outperform you in '24? The libertarian party is a sad, leftwing me-too joke now.
Trump (R): 77,302,580
Kamala (D): 75,017,613
Stein (G): 862,049
RFK Jr (I): 756,393
Chase (L): 650,126
Why yes, Chase did come in the rear.
There's really only two opposing discontents out there.
1) Those who believe Gov-Guns are for defending Liberty & ensuring Justice for all.
2) Those who believe Gov-Guns are for STEALING sh*t from those 'icky' people.
Spare me all the complexities of gangster-loyalty and excuses-confusion.
Anything beyond those two ideologies is massively insignificant in today's political environment.
Laehn seems better.
https://laehn4iowa.org/issues
From your link:
That sounds like a terrific position. I would vote for that. Would you?
The standard Trump defender strawman is that if you don't like Trump's immigration policies then you want completely and totally unrestricted immigration. They are incapable of even imagining anything in between. Their brains simply cannot grasp the concept. So if you detail some policy idea that is not Trump's policies and not zero border enforcement, their brains break and they start shouting "Liar, liar! This is what you want because this is what I practiced arguing against!" Fucking retards.
You and jeff dont just want open borders but also welfare based open borders. You'd cry about anyone who complains about their costs. You've cried about deporting criminals and those with final orders of removal. You deny what the word temporary in TPS means. You two are full of shit.
What you've done yet again is project yours and jeffs own behaviors. Because youre both leftist retards. More in common with Marxists than libertarians. Incapable of understanding an argument longer than a bumper sticker.
Even in your own post crying about strawman you made a strawman. In your own post ending with declaring what you think, ot comes after what you claim your enemies think.
Standard hypocrite leftist argumentation.
Even in your own post crying about strawman you made a strawman. In your own post ending with declaring what you think, ot comes after what you claim your enemies think.
They learned it from watching you, OK!
Retarded retards are retarded.
When the LP enters a race it might actually be able to WIN, instead of being spoilers, that's when I'll believe that the LP is a serious political party and not a debating society.
What a weird formulation.
oh FFS. The GOP had wide open primaries in 2016 and 2024. Trump won both times. It wasn't for lack of options.
According to Trump defenders, Libertarians are leftists for opposing Trump, but they're also spoilers who steal votes from Republicans.
More evidence that Trump defenders are retarded.
Did you look up a single position either of these people hold before your projection?