After All Those DOGE Cuts, Federal Spending Still Increased by $300 Billion
For the fiscal year that ended on September 30, the federal government spent more than $7 trillion and ran a $1.8 trillion deficit.

President Donald Trump returned to the White House with a promise to slash spending by trillions of dollars and balance the federal budget.
But, as the first fiscal year of his second term came to a close, progress had not been made on either of those goals.
Despite the high-profile efforts of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the 2025 federal fiscal year ended with the federal government having spent more money than it did in the previous fiscal year, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported this week. For the fiscal year that ended on September 30, the federal government spent a little more than $7 trillion, a $301 billion increase from FY 2024.
Because tax collections climbed by $308 billion over last year's total, the overall budget deficit fell by a scant $8 billion—but the government still spent $1.8 trillion more than it collected in taxes, according to the CBO's data. To put that $8 billion reduction in context, the federal government spends about $19 billion per day.
In short, the best thing that can be said about Trump's first nine months in charge of the federal government is that the deficit didn't get worse. That's praiseworthy, but still falls well short of what Trump (and his one-time ally Elon Musk) promised would happen.
The CBO's end-of-year report helpfully spells out which parts of the federal budget saw the biggest year-over-year spending increases. Overwhelmingly, and unsurprisingly, the biggest increases were for the so-called entitlement programs: Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. For those three programs, spending increased by a combined $245 billion.
Other big spending increases were recorded by the Pentagon ($38 billion) and the Department of Veterans Affairs ($41 billion), where the increase was driven by the rising cost of health care facilities. Interest payments on the national debt rose by $80 billion compared to the previous fiscal year's totals.
Overall, the CBO's report serves to underline the same fiscal reality that plagued the DOGE project: Cutting silly government contracts and foreign aid might be a worthwhile effort, but that won't make a dent in the budget deficit. Any serious effort at fiscal reform has to focus on the areas of the budget that are growing year over year—which, realistically, means looking at entitlement programs.
The first nine months are not the final word on Trump's second term, of course. One could also argue that spending would have grown by even more if not for DOGE's effort or if Trump had not been president. Those counterfactuals are impossible to disprove, but they are also besides the point: Trump did not promise to limit spending growth—he declared, in a scripted address to Congress, that he would balance the budget. That's the standard he has set for himself.
There are plenty of reasons to be skeptical that anything will change in the next three years. For one, Trump's track record after nearly five years as president does not suggest he cares very much about actually cutting spending. The coming years will also bring greater headwinds to any attempts at reducing the deficit. That's due in part to the expected increases in entitlement spending, as well as the fiscal effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which extended and expanded the 2017 tax cuts in ways that will likely add to the deficit.
As the new fiscal year begins, cutting spending and reducing the deficit ought to be top priorities for the Trump administration and Republican members of Congress. The last nine months demonstrate how difficult those tasks will be.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"In short, the best thing that can be said about Trump's first nine months in charge of the federal government is that the deficit didn't get worse. That's praiseworthy, but still falls well short of what Trump (and his one-time ally Elon Musk) promised would happen."
How much did Jill/Hunter cut?
p.s. I'm not talking about cocaine.
This is the game that seems to be played around here. Those dastardly Republicans barely slowed down spending, so let's strategically and reluctantly vote for Socialists!
"KAMALA WOULD HAVE BROUGHT IT DOWN I'M SURE!"
I can't believe that Trump couldn't convince Congress to reduce spending on a budget that took effect 4 months before he took office and 5 months before DOGE began.
Biden's byproduct downstream hidden costs starting to rear itself. All from paying for illegal immigrants, mostly medicare. Joe was glad they broke Medicare.
BS games by democrats trying to hang on to 1.5 trillion a year of unauthorized spending.
Pelosi's you got to let us drive the nail as deep as possible before you know what's in you as America is bent over for generations to come.
I'd like to know how many Pelosi investments were into companies etc that received government funding from bills she passed before she could tell us what's in them. Hidden slush funds.
Nancy is a key investment adviser for AOC, Ilhan Omar, Bernie Sanders, and other socialist politicians who want to get rich.
Actually it was approved after he took office.
EB;dr
Would guess the increase is due to the tariffs.
Included in the total are $80Bn in increased interest payments, which were already baked in before Trump's current term, and will continue to rise every year regardless of who's president.
Given the Mariana Trench-deep cuts that DOGE made (according to my local media), I shudder to think how much the federal spending would have increased without them!
Trump failed to cut spending that was voted on and allocated for the fiscal year that began prior to his even winning the election?
Shocking!
I was told he was a time traveler!
I was told that unilateral cutting of spending by the President was a big no-no.
(To be clear, I don’t think he should unless that spending is obviously unconstitutional, but then he shouldn’t be blamed when Congress doesn’t do their job.)
From the beginning , Doge was a scam initiated by shysters and cheered by fanatics, sheep, and the fanatically sheepish. All that came out of it was Project 2025 agenda cuts in order to give tax breaks to billionaires. Think about it, the only successful metric to come out of it is tax breaks to the Billionaires Club; every other quantifiable metric has been in the "L" column.
It's just gotten started, you stupid fuck, and it only identifies waste. It has no power to cut anything. The departments have to do that.
How can you be so amazingly ignorant but also so bizarrely self-confident in your ignorance?
Sadly you think you're clever spewing your bullshit.
Congratulations, you sound no different than Molly.
DOGE was never intended to save any money, and anyone who believes or says otherwise shows just how much of a dumb fuck they are
What was the intent?
To destroy the federal merit system, to destroy Congress's power of the purse, and to politicize the non-political parts of the government.
Fuck you're an idiot, Tony.
DOGE identifies waste. That's it. It has no power to cut anything. It's up to the individual departments and the administration to decide what they will do with the information they receive from it.
Did you really not know this, or are you being retarded on purpose?
imagine being as dumb as molly.
Took her 3 hours to think of that . Sad.
Sadly you could not have even thought of that bullshit yourself. Stupid parrot.
Wrong, it was meant to stop wasteful spending that was used for totally stupid projects including many overseas projects that were beyond ridiculous.
The liberals are absolutely enraged that some Trans group in Romania can't have their dance recital.
How dare they!
"To destroy the federal merit system,.."
You're a real laugh riot, fuckface!
Crawl back into that pile of shit you came from.
The primary reason that CONGRESS hasn’t cut much is because you democrats are holding the line. And now you want trillions in new spending on top of it.
If you want a balanced budget, then commit suicide. YOU are the problem.
to politicize the non-political parts of the government.
AHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Holy shit, this is nuclear tier gaslighting even for you.
Is DOGE a false flag?
Wow! Since this is coming from someone who is intimately familiar with being a dumb fuck, it means well, nothing...
You are right and you can clearly see that most of the commenters are upset anout that.
I wonder if anyone who took my bet that spending would increase will pay up...
They should at least pay up in Trump coin, but not sure what that's worth these days.
Stop samefagging your own posts, Sarcasmic. We all know Alberto Balsalm and the BelowAverage Dude are you.
He got drunk and couldn’t help himself.
I guess because government will never control spending - we should never try.
Who is being Eeyore now?
I just wonder when Elon will realize he got played as the useful idiot.
His job was to set up DOGE, Sarckles. How did he gEt pLaYeD?
It’s funny when people think they are smarter than musk.
Thing is, maybe you are smarter than Musk by some standard. Or at least similarly intelligent. *
But you aren't surrounded by the most brilliant people Musk can find to advise you, to support your vision, etc.
Musk's a smart guy, but he also surrounds himself with the types who can tear into data like you wouldn't believe, and who can figure out crazy shit like how to catch 200 foot tall rockets to reuse. They have specific knowledge Musk can use to understand and implement his general vision, which is a HUGE fucking multiplier to intelligence.
* to be clear, most aren't as smart. Musk is very intelligent and has a very creative, expansive, productive type of intelligence.
When will this asshole Alberto learn to spell "Brainless"?
S-E-V-O
I don’t know Sarc. Have you figured out you’ve been played as the useful idiot yet? Admittedly, ‘useful’ is a stretch in your case.
And the Democrats are shutting down the government in an attempt to increase spending immediately. The Trump Administration has tapped the brakes to slow spending while the Democrats want to put the gas pedal all the way to the floor on increasing spending.
The Dems want spending for their favorite projects like transitioning young children and more funding for TdA.
keep cheering you fucking bolshevik
So this is the actual story. All in a couple sentences. Didn't need the rest of the attempted slur. Trump's term including doge, tariffs and everything else in 9 months.
"Because tax collections climbed by $308 billion over last year's total, the overall budget deficit fell by a scant $8 billion—but the government still spent $1.8 trillion more than it collected in taxes, according to the CBO's data."
The beginning of turning around the run away spending has had positive notes and once the remaining harmful democrat Biden spending is finished being found and removed will you say thanks?
"...The beginning of turning around the run away spending has had positive notes and once the remaining harmful democrat Biden spending is finished being found and removed will you say thanks?..."
Not the TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit Boehm won't.
It’s amazing how Democrat presidents are always “saddled” with the previous president’s last budget of their term and Republican presidents are always “failing to cut spending” from the previous president’s last budget of their term.
And all of this bickering lets the people that are actually responsible off the hook.
Wheeeeee!
Yeah, figured it was going to turn out like this. All those personnel cuts sound nice, and taking USAID and CRS out behind the barn and ending them actually is a long-term benefit to the US. But the fact is that manning costs are a marginal part of what the government spends every year.
The empirical reality is that the vast majority of spending is in entitlements, and the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services in particular is what's driving most of the debt. We can either figure out a way to pay for the $2.1 trillion that one agency is costing us, or slash it to the bone. There's really no in-between.
Tax the wealthy and cut defense spending…that’s how Clinton created a surplus. Obama got to 3% deficit/GDP ratio by doing that and that’s what Trump inherited.
The tax rate was barely higher than it is now, defense spending can be cut by leaving NATO but will still be marginal, and Medicare/Medicaid weren't costing over 2 trillion a year in the 90s.
Exactly, it’s weird Republicans have to cut taxes and end up with a worse economy with bigger deficits.
If tax rates from the 90s were the solution, there wouldn't be a $1.75 trillion delta for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, you retard.
That’s an impressive amount of bullshit in one tiny post, shrike.
Overwhelmingly, and unsurprisingly, the biggest increases were for the so-called entitlement programs: Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. For those three programs, spending increased by a combined $245 billion.
Which you can't blame on either Trump or Musk.
But A+ for effort in trying to.
And they're not "so-called entitlement programs." They're entitlement programs. Especially since the majority of their dollars are going to people who haven't paid even remotely - if at all - into them what they're collecting.
Social Security could probably have the gap closed by raising the income cap, but even at that the demand will fall as the Boomers continue to die off.
Medicare/Medicaid is only funded for Medicare Part A, the remaining $1.75 trillion or so is pure deficit spending, outstripping even defense by a wide margin.
After reading about what can only be described as spending American taxpayer's money of some of the most ridiculous and outright stupid local and foreign projects such as Latvian LGBTQXYZ dance teams, the Dems have a hissy fit when they can no longer do so.
The democrat party is committing slow suicide. Let them do so.
Well, there is that pesky $1.22T interest on the national debt.
https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/interest-expense-avg-interest-rates/
Yet democrats are holding the budget hostage, demanding trillions more in deficit spending. Then they come here to complain that republicans spend too much.
At least the American taxpayers won't be forced at gunpoint to pay for transgender dance recitals in Latvia. Or woke reading classes in
Somalia.
Looks like the transgender actors in Ukraine won't be getting as much either. Zelly will have to divvy up from his own bank account that he stole from American tax payers.
F*** Zelensky.
"Trump's track record after nearly five years as president does not suggest he cares very much about actually cutting spending." ... "which extended and expanded the 2017 tax cuts"
Only in leftard-land can 'spending' completely-equate to 'tax cuts'.
Or the lefts brain paraphrased ... "NOT STEALING costs $!"