Trump Calls for Arrest of Chicago Mayor and Illinois Gov. Pritzker
As Illinois resists the federal immigration blitz, the Trump administration ups the ante on authoritarian rhetoric.

Republican President Donald Trump posted on social media today that Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, both Democrats, should be arrested for refusing to assist federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
"Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers! Governor Pritzker also!" Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Firing back on X, Pritzker wrote: "I will not back down. Trump is now calling for the arrest of elected representatives checking his power. What else is left on the path to full-blown authoritarianism?"
Illinois sued the Trump administration on Monday to block the deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Chicago, and Johnson is refusing to allow ICE to operate on city-owned property. Since the beginning of the Trump administration's immigration enforcement blitz in Chicago, ICE and Customs and Border Protection officers have executed mass warrantless searches of apartments, and they have been filmed using excessive force against protesters, clergy, and reporters engaged in protected First Amendment activities.
It's not a great state of affairs when the president is calling for the arrest of his political opponents at the same time he's sending the military into the streets. (Imagine reading the first sentence of this article as if it were another country.) Of course, in 2025 it feels like just another Wednesday in America's long perambulation toward a militarized police state.
As Reason's Matt Welch observed in a June column, shortly after the Trump administration deployed National Guard soldiers and Marines to Los Angeles, it had been roughly five years to the day since The New York Times published an op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.) calling for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act and send the military into cities to quell rioting during the summer of 2020. Trump didn't send in the troops then, and Republicans like Cotton and White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller were left with an unrequited itch to give the hippies a show of force they wouldn't forget.
Miller has been particularly enthusiastic about branding anyone who opposes the Trump administration—Democrats, lawyers, protesters, and judges—as terrorists and insurrectionists, which gives him a rhetorical fig leaf for whatever abuses of power he comes up with next. In a social media post last week, Miller accused a federal judge of "legal insurrection" for blocking Trump's deployment of Oregon National Guard Troops to Portland.
"The President is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, not an Oregon judge," Miller continued. "Portland and Oregon law enforcement, at the direction of local leaders, have refused to aid ICE officers facing relentless terrorist assault and threats to life….This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers, and the deployment of troops is an absolute necessity to defend our personnel, our laws, our government, public order and the Republic itself."
In a strange CNN interview on Monday, Miller was asked if the Trump administration would abide by the judge's ruling. Miller noted that the president has "plenary authority" before abruptly going silent. (The Wex Legal Dictionary defines "plenary power" as "complete power over a particular area with no limitations.")
"We are almost, if not quite, living in a Tom Cotton universe," Welch warned in June. Unfortunately, we've only gotten closer to the Cotton-verse in the months since then.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
As well he should, CJ. Both Pritzker and Johnson are guilty of sedition and insurrection. You want to know what a real insurrection looks like? Look at Johnson trying to nullify federal law and ban federal agents from doing their jobs.
Basically. SCOTUS precedent says Chicago has zero say on immigration policy, after all.
They even pay the violent protestors with a city/state policy to settle suits when they are arrested.
Since antifa is now officially a terror organization, anyone paying these piece, can go to prison too. Just need to make sure we don’t let any democrat judges interfere.
Citing "Red Wedding" Welch? Really?
1. Having lived and growing up in the Land of Lenin, I can assure it is THE most corrupt state in the Union, and investigating crimes, especially white collar financial crimes by governors, mayors, and other politicians there would be like shooting fish in a barrel. It would only take the will to do so.
2. If Comrade Johnson, the mayor of the hell hole called Chicago, and the Commissar of Illinois, Porky Pritzker did indeed commit a crime, then go to it DOJ.
But be as specific as possible what the crimes are, not just same vague and ambiguous allegations. Keep in mind the trial(s) would be in Illinois, and the judges there may not be sterling examples of legal virtue.
I like how Johnson is trying to FURTHER drive Chicago into bankruptcy to benefit the CTU --- while the press keeps ignoring that he is STILL a member of the CTU.
Because in IL, that's literally just how the law is *supposed* to work.
Grew up in Michigan and lived in California before coming to Illinois 40 years ago. I was stunned by the open and accepted corruption here. I would be delighted to see Pritzger in a federal penitentiary. He deserves it more than Blago did.
Trump has his own personal police force, is deploying soldiers in cities and calling for the arrest of local leaders who defy him, but don't you dare draw any historical parallels or say he's an authoritarian. That would make you a leftist.
You’re out of your element here, drunk Mainer. Now fuck off.
I saw this clip on maddow too. Many leftists like yourself are repeating it.
Almost a word for word repeat of mayor Brandon Johnson.
How much Maddow do you watch? Just two minutes for your daily hate?
We can’t manage the full show like you do.
Ah there it is. The classic strawman post from Sarc we have all come to know and expect. It's comforting, in a way. Like a warm blanket on a cold winter morning or a cool glass of lemonade after mowing the lawn.
Or the feel of warm poop oozing out of a frozen ass.
No, yes, and no. One out of three isn't bad though, for someone at your level of stupidity.
I miss the days when the Illinois gov was only trying to sell a senate seat.
My favorite part is the national-level, anachronistic/apocryphal political framing.
If you went back to 1990-2000 and said "President Donald Trump is cracking down on illegal immigration in Chicago." to anyone in IL the reply would be "Ooh, I bet the IL Democrats are upset that a NY Democrat is undercutting their efforts like that!"
Trump cracking down on immigration in IL would be completely drowned out by the intervening two decades of abject "W... T.... F.?"
Even that governor is aghast at what Pritzker and Johnson are doing.
It's not a great state of affairs when the president is calling for the arrest of his political opponents at the same time he's sending the military into the streets. (Imagine reading the first sentence of this article as if it were another country.)
Imagine writing the first sentence of that paragraph as if President Trump had not been subjected to a decade of relentless lawfare by the Democrats.
Imagine Trump defenders seeing him doing something that they know is wrong, and not saying "Oh but Democrats did it first that makes it ok!"
Imagine Trump ever actually doing something that Democrats haven't done first, and often.
I know, it's hard, because Democrats have done pretty much every awful thing you can imagine.
It's religious at this point. No matter what Trump does, not matter how bad, unlawful, unconstitutional or just plain evil it is, Democrats did it first. That is an article of faith for the Trumpian cult. Whatever it is, Democrats did it first. Not only that, but anyone who complains about Trump doing it didn't complain when Democrats did it. Or if they can prove that they complained, they didn't complain hard enough. That makes them hypocrites which makes whatever Trump did ok. You are a great defender of the religion.
Now let us pray.
Our Donald, who art in D.C., hallowed by thy name...
Your strawmen are limp.
Trump isn’t doing anything unlawful. You democrats are.
What has he done that's unconstitutional? The court has stepped in when he's tried. That's what every fucking president has done. Difference is NOW there's some pushback. We've been governed by Constitutional hating politicians and judges for so long who have implemented a complete federal takeover of our lives and dipshits like you think Trump is doing unconstitutional things? And rhetoric isn't the same as violating the constitution. We have laws on the books that shit headed politicians passed long before Trump got into office, and now the very dickheads who want more govt are upset when Trump attempts to use those laws. Maybe right, and maybe wrong, but that's what presidents have done since the birth of the country, you stupid jackass.
But Mommy, Johnny did it first!! WAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No wonder you rode the short bus.
So you admit Trump is acting lawfully, and you democrats just don’t like it?
Good. Now you only have to obey.
Whats wrong with what's being done? Please cite law and standards.
The Posse Comitatus Act.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Insurrection Act.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807
Right. If Eisenhower can send in the 101st Airborne to rifle butt and bayonet civilians, in direct contradiction to the Governor sending in the National Guard, just so 9 kids can go to school, protecting ICE agents arresting violent and other illegal foreign nationals should be a cakewalk.
Either you think the 9 kids should go to school and the immigrants should be legally removed from the country (or otherwise fined or imprisoned or subject to retrial as appropriate), you don't think schools should've been forcibly desegregated, or you don't believe in any sort of rule of law one way or the other and it's all just noise to you.
The only way forced desegregation *and* anti-immigration work is if you're an oblivious (at best) authoritarian who's only OK with the law as long as it's supporting you and/or punishing your enemies.
In one case the president wanted to send kids to school. In the other the president wants to send people to torture prisons. Yeah, totally the same.
Sending back to their home is torture?
Those countries are run by leftists like Sarc, so kinda.
The President wants to save lives
Strawman. Again.
Sparcles, you failed to weigh in on this yesterday:
https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/lancaster-county-nc-homicide-riverside-road-update-5-9-2025/275-e6fb429a-4b83-40b4-b276-46514b09e76b
I don't have to imagine reading it from The Peoples' Republic of Illinois as though I lived through the closure of non-essential businesses and mandating of masks for "two weeks" by rolling executive decree.
Yeah so openly obstructing immigration enforcement makes them political enemies and nothing more.
Firing back on X, Pritzker wrote: "I will not back down. Trump is now calling for the arrest of elected representatives checking his power. What else is left on the path to full-blown authoritarianism?"
Yes, sarc, Democrats did it first, prosecuting a Presidential candidate several times, and protecting a corrupt and senile sitting President.
Lawfare sucks. Restricting only one side of it is the true path to dictatorship.
One was the new administration going after the ex president for actual crimes. And I didn't support this, despite the lies repeated about me several times a day. I didn't want to see this country become a banana republic where every outgoing president has to flee the country because the new administration is going to find an excuse to put them in prison.
What you are defending is a sitting president going after political opponents, still in office, for crimes that have yet to be defined.
Those are not even remotely close to being the same thing.
As far as dictatorships go, the latter that you are defending, Stalinesque "Show me the man I'll show you the crime" behavior, is definitely something to be scared of. It's quite a bit different than going after someone after they leave office.
Hahahaa….
You’re a drunk clown. You have nothing besides incoherent raving. At this rate, Chicago will be under martial law, with Pritzker and Johnson in federal prison. Then you will be so apoplectic that you will undoubtedly suffer a stroke.
Life is sweet.
Lawfare sucks. Restricting only one side of it is the true path to dictatorship.
Not really. Two wrongs make a right-winger, but they don't make it right. They make it worse.
And it's just plain dishonest, like Jesse-level dishonest, to equate charging someone with crimes after they leave office with demanding that sitting political opponents be imprisoned for yet-to-be defined crimes. I oppose both by the way, regardless of who does it. You were vehemently opposed to charging Trump with crimes that he actually committed, yet you vehemently support him arbitrarily imprisoning political rivals for undefined crimes. Don't ever claim to have the high road buddy, you're operating in a trench down with your buddy Jesse.
You are such a leftie.
Choices:
1. Both sides throw each other in jail.
2. Only one side throws the other in jail.
Sarc: 2 2 2 2 2 ! as long as it's my side throwing the other in jail. Because if both sides throw each other in jail, 1 + 1 = 2 but the wrong 2 so I lose so I don't like it.
Or something. You spout too much nonsense to keep track of.
Prosecuting someone who is not in office for actual crimes is the same as demanding that sitting political opponents be imprisoned for defying the regime without defining any crimes or having a trial. Just lock them up. Like totally the same and stuff, you know? I mean, totally. At this point you're making Jesse look smart, and that's an achievement.
Are you totally fucking retarded or something?
You just hate it when the good guys hit back. Sucks to be you, doesn’t it bitch?
Get back to us when he actually starts doing 1% of the apocalyptic stuff you fantasize about.
These idiot democrats are going to finally give us the excuse to round them up and get rid of them. Then we can be free.
Well he's sending soldiers to cities run by his political opposition, despite the fact that you and others said he'd never ever ever ever ever do that. You said that D.C. was ok to occupy because it's under federal jurisdiction, and he'd never ever ever ever ever send troops to other cities.
Another strawman. Go sparcles go!
>As Illinois resists the federal immigration blitz, the Trump administration ups the ante on authoritarian rhetoric
If they are *resisting* they are breaking the law.
Their right *to not assist* does not extend to interfering.
Deploying the National Guard is what they are resisting, not ICE. They are resisting in a legal manner, through the courts. None of that is illegal.
And you know it.
Team Trump has wanted to do away with courts ever since they didn't give him the 2020 election. Him being prosecuted for crimes while Biden was in office solidified that view, and courts defying his executive orders was the final straw. At this point they view courts as an illegitimate institution and have no respect for any outcomes (unless it's in support of Trump).
No, we want to eliminate democrats from the LEGO process so it can be, well…… legal. As opposed to whatever some commie activist makes up to further their Marxism.
They are resisting ICE, this is why the national guard became necessary.
Are you capable of telling the truth at all? Or has your soul been completely consumed by the democrat party?
Not what I wrote. You should try *reading* what is wrote, not what you hear from the voices in your head.
1) Immaterial.
2) VERY much obstructing ICE as well.
Just going to ignore the actions of Johnson and Pritzker are we while playing up the activist interpretation of administration actions are we. This is a State and city in active insurrection against the Executive carrying out lawful duties. These two clowns are the ones making things worse by their actions and they deserve the fate of failed insurrectionists.
“ This is a State and city in active insurrection against the Executive carrying out lawful duties.”
It absolutely is not. Not in any way, shape, or form.
The hyperbole and lust for retribution against people doing legal things in a legal way is off the charts, even for Trump.
Doing legal things in a legal way is lawfare. That's why courts need to be abolished. Just let Trump decide what the law means. If he says the law lets him arbitrarily imprison political opponents, who are the courts to tell him otherwise?
That’s not what lawfare is you stupid drunken cunt. And none of the civil or criminal actions against Trump were ‘lawful’. What IS lawful is what Trump is dong to clean up your mess. And the democrat response is treason and insurrection.
At least if things continue to escalate we may finally exterminate you Marxists. I imagine when you meet your end that you will beg like a wino with the shakes. Something with which you are already familiar.
Yes, stop your hyperbole and admit the truth.
"they deserve the fate of failed insurrectionists"? Pardons and cushy government jobs?
Is that how you survive, asswipe?
Poor whining angry red diaper baby.
Do you need me to wipe away your tears little girl?
So as our various elected representatives proceed to their respective corners from which to do battle, just how far is this going to go? There is much rhetoric, but will if eventually and inevitably come down to actual conflict?
Trump is finally showing his true colors as an authoritarian dictator lacking knowledge of and appreciation for the limitations of his office.
It is time for his Vice President and Cabinet to invoke Section 4 of the 25th Amendment.
Again, Eisenhower sent in the 101st specifically to countermand the Governor's use of the National Guard so that 9 kids could go to school.
Harding literally dropped bombs on striking workers at The Battle of Blair Mountain.
The idea that Trump is some sort of Hitler-esque authoritarian ushering in some dark night of white supremacy and not even obliquely some "A House Divided" Lincoln-esque figure is obviously false to anyone who has an IQ above room temperature and/or isn't an abjectly dishonest hack.
Patton ran tanks through an encampment - legally apparently.
Imagine how George Patton would handle these democrats.
What? Enforcing the law exactly as his oath of office demands is being an authoritarian dictator to you? You are laughably stupid for that.
Which law is that? The Posse Comitatus Act?
Reason should do a story on the two times ICE/Border Patrol shot two Chicago residents. In both instances, DHS or ICE spokespersons fabricated a wild story about the shooting victim threatening or seriously wounding ICE agents. In both cases; videos later surfaced showing ICE was lying.
In the first instance, the person died. In the second, they were shot at 5times. She was arrested based on the officer's story but was released by a fed judge because her attorney obtained footage from an officer's bodycam showing he was lying. They said she rammed their car but it shows they side swiped her. They said she was armed and threatening but the video shows different. They said she had a rifle; she didn't. Her firearm (a handgun) was legally possessed with CCL permit and was in the passenger side of the car and never pointed at ICE agents.
There fucking lying and these untrained goons are shooting people and getting away with it. Cook Co should indict the fucker that shot the girl for attempt murder. Absolutely not a valid use of deadly force.
There going to shoot at the wrong person and get shot back. Then Trump will say...'look they are insurrecting.'
Self defense against tyranny should be applauded. And it would be on this board if it wasn't tied to the cult of personality of MAGA. ICE are not welcome here. They need to leave. They are going to encounter public and vocal resistance wherever they go. If they can't handle it and are not trained enough to not use deadly force in situations that don't call for it, they need to get the fuck out.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/06/attorney-woman-shot-ice-brighton-park-release/
And it would be on this board if it wasn't tied to the cult of personality of MAGA.
So true. If a Democrat was doing this the very same people who are defending it would be screaming about states' rights and federal tyranny. Instead they're screaming about gun control for trannies.
Democrats committed actual crimes when they were in charge. Trump has not.
Trump is a lawful president. Biden was a criminal. Case closed.
Yeah, you know that’s all bullshit, right? Because democrats are liars and propagandists.
Just like you.
Read the link. The girl ICE shot 5times was released from custody. If she did half of what ICE said she did no federal judge would have released her. The other guy is 6 feet underground so didn't have time to defend himself from lies. But there is video of that as well.
Also, the ICE goons shot a priest in the head with a gas pellet today. They shot him from the roof while he was standing out front with his arms raised praying at the Broadview ICE facility. Why don't you just google that and fuck off forever.
Untrained.clown.show.
ICE doesn't just need removed from Chicago and IL they need to be shot into the fucking sun. Bootlickers cheering them on can follow right behind as you are morally complicit.
Your ‘cite’ is a d elcrat newspaper that is known to brazenly lie to advance democrat narratives. It has no credibility. Much like you, but with a wider reach. And you people have lied so frequently that I you have destroyed any possible will ever have.
You cried wolf far too many times. No one believes you.
"...And it would be on this board if it wasn't tied to the cult of personality of MAGA..."
And we wonder what it would be like is slimy lying piles of TDS-addled shits would be kind enough to fuck off and die, asswipe.
It's clear from the story, notwithstanding the claims of the defendant's attorney, that she and her son were the aggressors that initiated this event. They were following agents acting within their legal authority and apparently breaking numerous traffic ordinances in their efforts to impede them. They were only there to obstruct. This was not peaceful assembly to petition the government. It was active aggression. As an attorney I would think you'd be able to figure that out. But, alas, you're just another low IQ troll.
That is clearly not authorized use of deadly force. ICE agents are being followed everywhere they go and people are honking and getting in their way. It doesn't give ICE a license to murder people.
Law enforcement rules of engagement don't allow deadly force for being inconvenienced or annoyed. The claims of the attorney were from an agents bodycam who is in the car with the psycho shooter. If they weren't true, the govt attorney would have clearly pointed it out to the Court.
If those obstructing them don’t stand down, and do not accept orders to do so, there will be escalating use of force. Just like with any law enforcement. If you democrats are too batshit stupid to understand that, tough shit.
This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers
That utterance is a terrorist attack by the federal govt on everyone who is hearing such nonsense.
You prefer to safe terror attack for the Jews, right?
We don’t agree on this.
That is exactly what terrorists say.
They're resisting. Do what you gotta do, 5-0.
"and I did time?" ~~ Blago
https://www.newyorker.com/cartoons/daily-cartoon/monday-october-6th-deployed-protests
He literally didn't call for anyone to be arrested. He said they should be in jail. He has every right to think that. Wake us up when he actually attempts to arrest them.. you jackasses.