Trump Calls for Arrest of Chicago Mayor and Illinois Gov. Pritzker
As Illinois resists the federal immigration blitz, the Trump administration ups the ante on authoritarian rhetoric.
Republican President Donald Trump posted on social media today that Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, both Democrats, should be arrested for refusing to assist federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
"Chicago Mayor should be in jail for failing to protect Ice Officers! Governor Pritzker also!" Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Firing back on X, Pritzker wrote: "I will not back down. Trump is now calling for the arrest of elected representatives checking his power. What else is left on the path to full-blown authoritarianism?"
Illinois sued the Trump administration on Monday to block the deployment of federalized National Guard troops to Chicago, and Johnson is refusing to allow ICE to operate on city-owned property. Since the beginning of the Trump administration's immigration enforcement blitz in Chicago, ICE and Customs and Border Protection officers have executed mass warrantless searches of apartments, and they have been filmed using excessive force against protesters, clergy, and reporters engaged in protected First Amendment activities.
It's not a great state of affairs when the president is calling for the arrest of his political opponents at the same time he's sending the military into the streets. (Imagine reading the first sentence of this article as if it were another country.) Of course, in 2025 it feels like just another Wednesday in America's long perambulation toward a militarized police state.
As Reason's Matt Welch observed in a June column, shortly after the Trump administration deployed National Guard soldiers and Marines to Los Angeles, it had been roughly five years to the day since The New York Times published an op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton (R–Ark.) calling for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act and send the military into cities to quell rioting during the summer of 2020. Trump didn't send in the troops then, and Republicans like Cotton and White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller were left with an unrequited itch to give the hippies a show of force they wouldn't forget.
Miller has been particularly enthusiastic about branding anyone who opposes the Trump administration—Democrats, lawyers, protesters, and judges—as terrorists and insurrectionists, which gives him a rhetorical fig leaf for whatever abuses of power he comes up with next. In a social media post last week, Miller accused a federal judge of "legal insurrection" for blocking Trump's deployment of Oregon National Guard Troops to Portland.
"The President is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, not an Oregon judge," Miller continued. "Portland and Oregon law enforcement, at the direction of local leaders, have refused to aid ICE officers facing relentless terrorist assault and threats to life….This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers, and the deployment of troops is an absolute necessity to defend our personnel, our laws, our government, public order and the Republic itself."
In a strange CNN interview on Monday, Miller was asked if the Trump administration would abide by the judge's ruling. Miller noted that the president has "plenary authority" before abruptly going silent. (The Wex Legal Dictionary defines "plenary power" as "complete power over a particular area with no limitations.")
"We are almost, if not quite, living in a Tom Cotton universe," Welch warned in June. Unfortunately, we've only gotten closer to the Cotton-verse in the months since then.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
As well he should, CJ. Both Pritzker and Johnson are guilty of sedition and insurrection. You want to know what a real insurrection looks like? Look at Johnson trying to nullify federal law and ban federal agents from doing their jobs.
Basically. SCOTUS precedent says Chicago has zero say on immigration policy, after all.
They even pay the violent protestors with a city/state policy to settle suits when they are arrested.
Since antifa is now officially a terror organization, anyone paying these piece, can go to prison too. Just need to make sure we don’t let any democrat judges interfere.
After Emmanuel and IPRA reform, Chicago's murder clearance rate jumped something like 50%, from the mid-30% to almost 50%, more in line with the national average.
It's a not-too-closely-guarded secret that the distinction isn't that CPD started doing more investigations, apprehending more murderers, and making more arrests. They just added and/or increased the number of cases of "already in custody" and "did not prosecute".
Disagreeing with Trump is sedition.
They are free to disagree with President Trump all they want, and it will never be sedition, no matter what the disagreement may be.
Preventing President Trump from enforcing Constutional Federal Law, however, is by definition sedition and insurrection.
Citing "Red Wedding" Welch? Really?
1. Having lived and growing up in the Land of Lenin, I can assure it is THE most corrupt state in the Union, and investigating crimes, especially white collar financial crimes by governors, mayors, and other politicians there would be like shooting fish in a barrel. It would only take the will to do so.
2. If Comrade Johnson, the mayor of the hell hole called Chicago, and the Commissar of Illinois, Porky Pritzker did indeed commit a crime, then go to it DOJ.
But be as specific as possible what the crimes are, not just same vague and ambiguous allegations. Keep in mind the trial(s) would be in Illinois, and the judges there may not be sterling examples of legal virtue.
I like how Johnson is trying to FURTHER drive Chicago into bankruptcy to benefit the CTU --- while the press keeps ignoring that he is STILL a member of the CTU.
Because in IL, that's literally just how the law is *supposed* to work.
Grew up in Michigan and lived in California before coming to Illinois 40 years ago. I was stunned by the open and accepted corruption here. I would be delighted to see Pritzger in a federal penitentiary. He deserves it more than Blago did.
Nobody is making you stay. Leave.
Weren't you one of Smollet's attorneys?
WindyCityBarista once served him a coffee.
Three have been four Illinois governors who have spent time in prison.
Maybe Prickster should be next.
The people of Illinois deserve better than that. The people of Chicago need to pull their heads out of their butts and realize their votes have consequences. They can't complain about all the crime when they vote for ignorant, stupid, incompetent people such as Lightfoot and Johnson for mayor.
If you thought Lori :Beetlejuice" Lightfoot was bad along comes "let's Go" Brandon Johnson.
After all Lightfoot had the biggest dick in Chicago.
Trump has his own personal police force, is deploying soldiers in cities and calling for the arrest of local leaders who defy him, but don't you dare draw any historical parallels or say he's an authoritarian. That would make you a leftist.
You’re out of your element here, drunk Mainer. Now fuck off.
I saw this clip on maddow too. Many leftists like yourself are repeating it.
Almost a word for word repeat of mayor Brandon Johnson.
How much Maddow do you watch? Just two minutes for your daily hate?
We can’t manage the full show like you do.
I can't manage to watch her at all. gag
I do enjoy a bit of Gutfeld and Tyrus is hosting the show this week.
Totally sane.
Ah there it is. The classic strawman post from Sarc we have all come to know and expect. It's comforting, in a way. Like a warm blanket on a cold winter morning or a cool glass of lemonade after mowing the lawn.
Or the feel of warm poop oozing out of a frozen ass.
While lying on a frozen puddle of urine and vomit.
You have no clue what "straw man" actually means. You just heard it somewhere and toss it around as an all-purpose conversation avoidance device. Like you ever took college-level logic or rhetoric. Whether ICE is being used as Trump's personal police force is a straightforward, debatable claim. Not a rhetorical trick. Not a logical fallacy. A plain factual assertion that you don't deign to controvert.
Oh, but the problem is that it's very easy to controvert: President Trump is using ICE to enforce immigration law, and hence he's not using it as "his personal police force" -- let alone going down an authoritarian "slipper slope".
It's so easy to controvert, I cannot blame people who consider it a common sense given that doesn't need explaining to not bother controverting it.
Removing dangerous people including ILLEGAL ALIENS, who rape, molest children, carjack, rob, murder and traffic drugs is one of the responsibilities of a President.
No community should have to be victimized by these monsters.
ICE is doing exactly what they have been charged with: the removal of those who are here illegally especially criminals.
No, yes, and no. One out of three isn't bad though, for someone at your level of stupidity.
I miss the days when the Illinois gov was only trying to sell a senate seat.
My favorite part is the national-level, anachronistic/apocryphal political framing.
If you went back to 1990-2000 and said "President Donald Trump is cracking down on illegal immigration in Chicago." to anyone in IL the reply would be "Ooh, I bet the IL Democrats are upset that a NY Democrat is undercutting their efforts like that!"
Trump cracking down on immigration in IL would be completely drowned out by the intervening two decades of abject "W... T.... F.?"
Even that governor is aghast at what Pritzker and Johnson are doing.
It's not a great state of affairs when the president is calling for the arrest of his political opponents at the same time he's sending the military into the streets. (Imagine reading the first sentence of this article as if it were another country.)
Imagine writing the first sentence of that paragraph as if President Trump had not been subjected to a decade of relentless lawfare by the Democrats.
Imagine Trump defenders seeing him doing something that they know is wrong, and not saying "Oh but Democrats did it first that makes it ok!"
Imagine Trump ever actually doing something that Democrats haven't done first, and often.
I know, it's hard, because Democrats have done pretty much every awful thing you can imagine.
It's religious at this point. No matter what Trump does, not matter how bad, unlawful, unconstitutional or just plain evil it is, Democrats did it first. That is an article of faith for the Trumpian cult. Whatever it is, Democrats did it first. Not only that, but anyone who complains about Trump doing it didn't complain when Democrats did it. Or if they can prove that they complained, they didn't complain hard enough. That makes them hypocrites which makes whatever Trump did ok. You are a great defender of the religion.
Now let us pray.
Our Donald, who art in D.C., hallowed by thy name...
Your strawmen are limp.
Trump isn’t doing anything unlawful. You democrats are.
What has he done that's unconstitutional? The court has stepped in when he's tried. That's what every fucking president has done. Difference is NOW there's some pushback. We've been governed by Constitutional hating politicians and judges for so long who have implemented a complete federal takeover of our lives and dipshits like you think Trump is doing unconstitutional things? And rhetoric isn't the same as violating the constitution. We have laws on the books that shit headed politicians passed long before Trump got into office, and now the very dickheads who want more govt are upset when Trump attempts to use those laws. Maybe right, and maybe wrong, but that's what presidents have done since the birth of the country, you stupid jackass.
That is a very thoughtful and insightful point, one which I had not heard expressed previously.
Lol. JFC, dude.
But Mommy, Johnny did it first!! WAAAAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No wonder you rode the short bus.
That's why they call him Special Ed.
So you admit Trump is acting lawfully, and you democrats just don’t like it?
Good. Now you only have to obey.
Now check out what this democrat is saying: blaming Trump for the ANTIFA riots in Portland.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/desperate-dem-sen-claims-trump-staged-portland-antifa-riots-justify-crackdown
The Dems have lost their minds.
Whats wrong with what's being done? Please cite law and standards.
The Posse Comitatus Act.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act
Insurrection Act.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807
Right. If Eisenhower can send in the 101st Airborne to rifle butt and bayonet civilians, in direct contradiction to the Governor sending in the National Guard, just so 9 kids can go to school, protecting ICE agents arresting violent and other illegal foreign nationals should be a cakewalk.
Either you think the 9 kids should go to school and the immigrants should be legally removed from the country (or otherwise fined or imprisoned or subject to retrial as appropriate), you don't think schools should've been forcibly desegregated, or you don't believe in any sort of rule of law one way or the other and it's all just noise to you.
The only way forced desegregation *and* anti-immigration work is if you're an oblivious (at best) authoritarian who's only OK with the law as long as it's supporting you and/or punishing your enemies.
In one case the president wanted to send kids to school. In the other the president wants to send people to torture prisons. Yeah, totally the same.
Sending back to their home is torture?
Those countries are run by leftists like Sarc, so kinda.
The President wants to save lives
Strawman. Again.
Sparcles, you failed to weigh in on this yesterday:
https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/lancaster-county-nc-homicide-riverside-road-update-5-9-2025/275-e6fb429a-4b83-40b4-b276-46514b09e76b
“ Insurrection Act.”
That doesn’t mean what you and Trump think it means. Neither of them have done anything that violates that law.
The Posse Comitatus Act, on the other hand, is very much what Trump is violating.
You sure about that? That lame argument has yet to survive on appeal. Got anything else ?
Perhaps you could give me the cases where your point is supported? As I understand it, Trump hasn’t won anything close to what you’re claiming. Not on appeal and not on the original cases.
Democrats do it because they don't know it hurts. Maybe after President Trump turns the tables and does it to them for a while, they'll stop doing it in the future themselves.
If it's ok for Democrats to do it, then why isn't it ok for Republicans to do it? If it's not ok for Republicans to do it, then it's not ok for Democrats to do it, either -- in which case, we need to subject those Democrats who did it to some form of punishment, so they never do it again.
So, what do you propose? Because when you say that Republicans shouldn't be doing what Democrats have been doing to them, my "Babel fish" translates this to "Whaaa, no fair, fighting back with the same weapons we attacked you with! Why don't you play nice, now that you have the upper hand on us?"
Imagine a mayor so corrupt, so incompetent and so ignorant as to create conditions in a town that makes it dangerous to even walk the streets during the day.
As for Prickster a slimy politician if ever there was one has been no great help for the state either.
People are leaving Illinois in droves. property taxes are among the highest.
Even small town mayors are corrupt as hell ie: Tiffany Henyard, former mayor of Dalton.
Illinois needs a clean up is ever there was a state that needed it.
I don't have to imagine reading it from The Peoples' Republic of Illinois as though I lived through the closure of non-essential businesses and mandating of masks for "two weeks" by rolling executive decree.
Yeah so openly obstructing immigration enforcement makes them political enemies and nothing more.
When did they do that and where did it happen?
Firing back on X, Pritzker wrote: "I will not back down. Trump is now calling for the arrest of elected representatives checking his power. What else is left on the path to full-blown authoritarianism?"
Yes, sarc, Democrats did it first, prosecuting a Presidential candidate several times, and protecting a corrupt and senile sitting President.
Lawfare sucks. Restricting only one side of it is the true path to dictatorship.
One was the new administration going after the ex president for actual crimes. And I didn't support this, despite the lies repeated about me several times a day. I didn't want to see this country become a banana republic where every outgoing president has to flee the country because the new administration is going to find an excuse to put them in prison.
What you are defending is a sitting president going after political opponents, still in office, for crimes that have yet to be defined.
Those are not even remotely close to being the same thing.
As far as dictatorships go, the latter that you are defending, Stalinesque "Show me the man I'll show you the crime" behavior, is definitely something to be scared of. It's quite a bit different than going after someone after they leave office.
Hahahaa….
You’re a drunk clown. You have nothing besides incoherent raving. At this rate, Chicago will be under martial law, with Pritzker and Johnson in federal prison. Then you will be so apoplectic that you will undoubtedly suffer a stroke.
Life is sweet.
Chicago has become a warning to all when it comes time to vote mayor and even governor.
The damage, however, has been done and Chicago may never recover.
Sarc, it disturbed me to see Presidential Candidate Trump to call for the arrest and imprisonment of Hillary Clinton -- even though I thoroughly believe she should have been tried, found guilty, and imprisoned -- but I didn't want to see a President imprison a former Presidential rival, because that is a dark road to go down.
So I was enormously relieved when, as President, Trump refused to fulfill that particular campaign promise (at least to the degree it was a promise -- calls for "lock her up" could easily be interpreted as an emphasis that she did illegal things).
And then, what do Democrats do right after President Trump leaves office? They go after him and his supporters, his lawyers, and everyone else guns blazing.
At this point, I don't care if it's wrong to do this. Democrats did it first, even after President Trump promised it and declined pursuing that promise. Democrats did it hard, too. They deserve to have the tables turned against them like this, and if America's luck holds, we only have to endure this for a term, and we could have 20 years of Republican Presidents who don't do this because they don't need to, because Democrats played their hand so hard, they leave such a bad taste in everyone's mouths, that no one wants to elect another Democrat for so much as a dog catcher.
Maybe then, when Democrats get back in power, they'll remember it's a very bad idea to go after political opponents with a vengeance.
It wasn't jus because Hillary was a rival, it is for her involvement with the Russian collusion hoax.
Forget Hllary, she a bitter, mean, nasty old woman.
When she's gone, the world will be a better place without her.
Lawfare sucks. Restricting only one side of it is the true path to dictatorship.
Not really. Two wrongs make a right-winger, but they don't make it right. They make it worse.
And it's just plain dishonest, like Jesse-level dishonest, to equate charging someone with crimes after they leave office with demanding that sitting political opponents be imprisoned for yet-to-be defined crimes. I oppose both by the way, regardless of who does it. You were vehemently opposed to charging Trump with crimes that he actually committed, yet you vehemently support him arbitrarily imprisoning political rivals for undefined crimes. Don't ever claim to have the high road buddy, you're operating in a trench down with your buddy Jesse.
You are such a leftie.
Choices:
1. Both sides throw each other in jail.
2. Only one side throws the other in jail.
Sarc: 2 2 2 2 2 ! as long as it's my side throwing the other in jail. Because if both sides throw each other in jail, 1 + 1 = 2 but the wrong 2 so I lose so I don't like it.
Or something. You spout too much nonsense to keep track of.
Prosecuting someone who is not in office for actual crimes is the same as demanding that sitting political opponents be imprisoned for defying the regime without defining any crimes or having a trial. Just lock them up. Like totally the same and stuff, you know? I mean, totally. At this point you're making Jesse look smart, and that's an achievement.
Are you totally fucking retarded or something?
You just hate it when the good guys hit back. Sucks to be you, doesn’t it bitch?
Get back to us when he actually starts doing 1% of the apocalyptic stuff you fantasize about.
These idiot democrats are going to finally give us the excuse to round them up and get rid of them. Then we can be free.
Well he's sending soldiers to cities run by his political opposition, despite the fact that you and others said he'd never ever ever ever ever do that. You said that D.C. was ok to occupy because it's under federal jurisdiction, and he'd never ever ever ever ever send troops to other cities.
Because democrat cities are violent shitholes filled with communists like you Drunky. So he has to send troops in so ICE can safely clean out all the illegals you brought here.
So this is all your fault. Trump is just cleaning up your mess. Just be grateful you’re allowed to continue to draw breath. Which is more generous than you deserve.
You know, we spoil you. So show some fucking gratitude.
There isn't a single democrat run city that hasn't been turned into violence riddled toilets filled with corruption and crime. Unfortunately they drag the rest of the state down with them.
Another strawman. Go sparcles go!
His cognitive deficits and overall mental health have really declined rapidly since Trump brokebacked him again in January. At this point, no amount of booze can effectively numb his impotent leftist rage.
What were the "actual crimes", dude ? Please be specific.
>As Illinois resists the federal immigration blitz, the Trump administration ups the ante on authoritarian rhetoric
If they are *resisting* they are breaking the law.
Their right *to not assist* does not extend to interfering.
Deploying the National Guard is what they are resisting, not ICE. They are resisting in a legal manner, through the courts. None of that is illegal.
And you know it.
Team Trump has wanted to do away with courts ever since they didn't give him the 2020 election. Him being prosecuted for crimes while Biden was in office solidified that view, and courts defying his executive orders was the final straw. At this point they view courts as an illegitimate institution and have no respect for any outcomes (unless it's in support of Trump).
No, we want to eliminate democrats from the LEGO process so it can be, well…… legal. As opposed to whatever some commie activist makes up to further their Marxism.
‘Legal’. I think my autocorrect is as drunk as Sarc sometimes.
They are resisting ICE, this is why the national guard became necessary.
Are you capable of telling the truth at all? Or has your soul been completely consumed by the democrat party?
Not what I wrote. You should try *reading* what is wrote, not what you hear from the voices in your head.
“ If they are *resisting* they are breaking the law.”
This is what you wrote. It isn’t true. So take your own advice, Skippy.
1) Immaterial.
2) VERY much obstructing ICE as well.
The insurrectionist traitors are being treated the same way anyone else obstructing law enforcement would be treated anywhere. In fact, the Feds are going way too easy on them.
“ 1) Immaterial”
Let’s see if I have this straight. It’s immaterial whether or not any law has been broken (none have) as to whether or not the Illinois governor and the Chicago mayor should be arrested? At least you’re shameless and proud in your authoritarianism. Better than a lot of other MAGAs who still pretend Trump isn’t a despot.
“ 2) VERY much obstructing ICE as well.”
Really? When and where?
Just going to ignore the actions of Johnson and Pritzker are we while playing up the activist interpretation of administration actions are we. This is a State and city in active insurrection against the Executive carrying out lawful duties. These two clowns are the ones making things worse by their actions and they deserve the fate of failed insurrectionists.
“ This is a State and city in active insurrection against the Executive carrying out lawful duties.”
It absolutely is not. Not in any way, shape, or form.
The hyperbole and lust for retribution against people doing legal things in a legal way is off the charts, even for Trump.
Doing legal things in a legal way is lawfare. That's why courts need to be abolished. Just let Trump decide what the law means. If he says the law lets him arbitrarily imprison political opponents, who are the courts to tell him otherwise?
That’s not what lawfare is you stupid drunken cunt. And none of the civil or criminal actions against Trump were ‘lawful’. What IS lawful is what Trump is dong to clean up your mess. And the democrat response is treason and insurrection.
At least if things continue to escalate we may finally exterminate you Marxists. I imagine when you meet your end that you will beg like a wino with the shakes. Something with which you are already familiar.
Next, Trump should consider Portland, Or. where the line between ANTIFA and the police has been blurred.
Yes, stop your hyperbole and admit the truth.
"they deserve the fate of failed insurrectionists"? Pardons and cushy government jobs?
Is that how you survive, asswipe?
Poor whining angry red diaper baby.
Do you need me to wipe away your tears little girl?
That only comes after the insurrectionists are vanquished. While the war is going, we fight as hard as we could.
So as our various elected representatives proceed to their respective corners from which to do battle, just how far is this going to go? There is much rhetoric, but will if eventually and inevitably come down to actual conflict?
No, it won’t.
Trump is finally showing his true colors as an authoritarian dictator lacking knowledge of and appreciation for the limitations of his office.
It is time for his Vice President and Cabinet to invoke Section 4 of the 25th Amendment.
Again, Eisenhower sent in the 101st specifically to countermand the Governor's use of the National Guard so that 9 kids could go to school.
Harding literally dropped bombs on striking workers at The Battle of Blair Mountain.
The idea that Trump is some sort of Hitler-esque authoritarian ushering in some dark night of white supremacy and not even obliquely some "A House Divided" Lincoln-esque figure is obviously false to anyone who has an IQ above room temperature and/or isn't an abjectly dishonest hack.
Patton ran tanks through an encampment - legally apparently.
Imagine how George Patton would handle these democrats.
“ Again, Eisenhower sent in the 101st specifically to countermand the Governor's use of the National Guard so that 9 kids could go to school.
Harding literally dropped bombs on striking workers at The Battle of Blair Mountain.”
So your argument is that other people did awful things, so Trump can and no one should object? Yeah, that’s on-brand for you.
OK, Strawcasmic.
I'm sick and tired of people who did bad things to other people turn around and complain when those other people do bad things back.
We're sick of playing nice when our opponents consider us so evil, that outright political assassination is literally considered justified -- and literally celebrated. We can endure this kind of aggression for only so long before we realize "hey, maybe these guys aren't stupid, but are outright evil" and then act accordingly.
“ I'm sick and tired of people who did bad things to other people turn around and complain when those other people do bad things back.”
This is why everyone with a brain points out that MAGA conservatives and the GOP have no principles.
First, none of the people Trump is targeting “did bad things to other people”. Literally no one has done the things that Trump os doing. Violating the Posse Comitatus Act. Murdering unidentified people in international waters. Extorting money and punishing speech from companies that have mergers awaiting approval. Various other grafts and scams using the power of government as a threat.
But mostly, the fact that MAGA believes that two wrongs make a right shows they have no principles, only rage.
MAGA is not only anti-American, it’s actively evil. And it got there so quickly it’s frightening to rational Americans.
The complete indifference to laws and the overt and celebratory way Trump governs for the small percentage (1/3 of adults) who supported him and against the rest if the country mocks and demeans the office of the President.
As we celebrate the 250th anniversary of our country, the nobility and integrity of our first President has found its antithesis in our 47th.
First off, Law Professor Glenn Reynolds makes a very good case why the Insurrection Act applies here, and why it doesn't violate the Posse Comitatus Act. Go over to his Substack Essay to go over the details. If you want to convince me you are correct, you will have to refute his explanation.
Second, you accuse President Trump of being actively evil. However, who did this to our country?
* Set Washington DC on fire at the inauguration of a President they didn't like.
* Set cities across the country on fire, inciting riots that killed at least 3 dozen people.
* Tried to reframe our history from one of liberty, established in 1776, to one of slavey, in 1619, using dubious at best, outright lies at worst, "historical" essays.
* Go around the world apologizing for everything America has ever done.
* Gave Putin encouragement by saying we wouldn't object to minor incursions into Ukrainian territory.
* Govern over the most violent cities in the world, by pursuing light sentences for the most violent among us, refusing to fund or support police officers, and freeing without bail even the most violent of suspects among us.
* Use the FBI and the CIA to disingenuously hamper an incoming President.
* Actively censor people, on request by the FBI and CIA, on social media websites, who are going against the approved narrative.
* Create the biggest entrampment scheme in the history of this country, so that political dissidents could be arrested, tortured, denied due process and speedy trials, and subjected to sham trials.
* Conduct lawfare against their former political opponent.
* Attempt to assassinate House members, Senators, Supreme Court Justices, and Presidential Candidates.
* Celebrates the death of children who might be the children of political opponents.
* Celebrate en mass (eg, in the order of hundreds of thousands) when a dissenter is assassinated, and call for others to be targeted next.
* Refuse to denounce one of their own, who championed the death of the children of one of his opponents, and who said he wouldn't hesitate to shoot his opponent if given the opportunity.
I could go on and on, but there's a clear pattern to this: this is the pattern of a Party whose principles are "Our enemies are evil, and thus we can say any lie against them, no matter how big, do anything to them, up to and including murder, and we will be morally justified" and "Do anything it takes to get, to keep, and to exercise raw power, no matter what harm is caused in its wake" and finally "We hate America and its freedoms, so we'll commit all manner of violence, lies, and atrocities to subject them to our rightful rule."
And now we have a President who is trying to restore order, and mostly doing it legally -- and to the degree he is pushing Constitutional boundaries, he's doing exactly what each and every President before him has done before him -- and almost every act he does has around 70% to 80% approval (even if only 1/3 of them voted for him). But, because of this, you call him a tyrant. And you claim he doesn't have any "principles" because he's willing to push back against the Party you favor. I have seen your principles, and I do not trust your judgment on what constitutes good principles. I will take President Trump's "unprincipled" approach to governing over anything you would claim to be acceptible.
You bemoan the fact that this "tyrant" will be overseeing our 250th Anniversary -- but I, for one, am deeply grateful that rather than having someone who will approach this celebration wish sackcloth and ashes, telling us how evil we've been for the last 250 years, we have someone who loves our Country, and wants to celebrate the good we've done over the years -- because on balance, we have done far more good than bad in our existence, and that's despite Democrat meddling and trying to throw wrenches into our pursuits of freedom for most of that time.
Philly mayor Frank Rizzo dropped bombs on a house where members of MOVE had lived. 1985
What? Enforcing the law exactly as his oath of office demands is being an authoritarian dictator to you? You are laughably stupid for that.
Which law is that? The Posse Comitatus Act?
Lost your TDS meds, asshole?
Insurrection Act, dipshit.
That’s not what that law says.
Then why don't you enlighten us with your vast intellect?
I’m not a lawyer, but this could help:
https://legalclarity.org/18-u-s-c-1385-the-posse-comitatus-act-explained/
Or just read the text of the Act.
Now enlighten us with the relevant text from the Insurrection Act, and how it can override the Posse Comitatus Act.
The Posse Comitatus Act doesn't exist in a vacuum, after all!
“ What? Enforcing the law exactly as his oath of office demands is being an authoritarian dictator to you?”
Really? Which law is that, Captain Cruelty?
So enforcing federal immigration law, that which neither states not municipalities can make, is cruel and authoritarian now?
Enforcing immigration law is specifically and intentionally a federal task. States not only aren’t allowed to make immigration law, they aren’t allowed to enforce immigration law.
But that’s not why Trump claims he’s sending in the National Guard, so even your weak bullshit is transparently false.
Reason should do a story on the two times ICE/Border Patrol shot two Chicago residents. In both instances, DHS or ICE spokespersons fabricated a wild story about the shooting victim threatening or seriously wounding ICE agents. In both cases; videos later surfaced showing ICE was lying.
In the first instance, the person died. In the second, they were shot at 5times. She was arrested based on the officer's story but was released by a fed judge because her attorney obtained footage from an officer's bodycam showing he was lying. They said she rammed their car but it shows they side swiped her. They said she was armed and threatening but the video shows different. They said she had a rifle; she didn't. Her firearm (a handgun) was legally possessed with CCL permit and was in the passenger side of the car and never pointed at ICE agents.
There fucking lying and these untrained goons are shooting people and getting away with it. Cook Co should indict the fucker that shot the girl for attempt murder. Absolutely not a valid use of deadly force.
There going to shoot at the wrong person and get shot back. Then Trump will say...'look they are insurrecting.'
Self defense against tyranny should be applauded. And it would be on this board if it wasn't tied to the cult of personality of MAGA. ICE are not welcome here. They need to leave. They are going to encounter public and vocal resistance wherever they go. If they can't handle it and are not trained enough to not use deadly force in situations that don't call for it, they need to get the fuck out.
https://www.chicagotribune.com/2025/10/06/attorney-woman-shot-ice-brighton-park-release/
And it would be on this board if it wasn't tied to the cult of personality of MAGA.
So true. If a Democrat was doing this the very same people who are defending it would be screaming about states' rights and federal tyranny. Instead they're screaming about gun control for trannies.
Democrats committed actual crimes when they were in charge. Trump has not.
Trump is a lawful president. Biden was a criminal. Case closed.
Hurr durrrr. Biden has how many felony convictions again? Trump is a life long scumbag and probable pedophile. The house will come back into session, Massie will get his votes, Epstein files will be released and MAGA is going to have to reckon with their raving support of a child molester. It's not like the signs weren't glaringly obvious...but that is going to be MAGA's problem. Then its going to be the GOP's problem since MAGA took over the GOP and is the GOP.
The only question is how far will Trump go to hold onto power after his depravity cannot be hidden from the masses any longer.
Stop pretending you care about depravity -- it's clear that the only thing that matters to you is that "your guys" are in power.
If you have a problem with a life long scumbag and a probable pedophile for President, why were you not concerned about child-hair-sniffing Pretendent Biden? And considering all that has been leaked about President Trump in the last two terms, why should we suddenly expect revelations that President Trump was an Epstein client, when Democrats were looking for every possible angle to destroy President Trump these past eight years?
I strongly suspect that President Trump can't release the Epstein files -- because the Democrat-friendly FBI had four years to destroy those files to protect Pretendent Biden and other Democrats.
Joe Biden has along history of corruption and malfeasance.
Being stupid isn't a crime but the rest of us shouldn't have to pay for it.
Don't forget....10% for the big guy.
Yeah, you know that’s all bullshit, right? Because democrats are liars and propagandists.
Just like you.
Read the link. The girl ICE shot 5times was released from custody. If she did half of what ICE said she did no federal judge would have released her. The other guy is 6 feet underground so didn't have time to defend himself from lies. But there is video of that as well.
Also, the ICE goons shot a priest in the head with a gas pellet today. They shot him from the roof while he was standing out front with his arms raised praying at the Broadview ICE facility. Why don't you just google that and fuck off forever.
Untrained.clown.show.
ICE doesn't just need removed from Chicago and IL they need to be shot into the fucking sun. Bootlickers cheering them on can follow right behind as you are morally complicit.
Your ‘cite’ is a d elcrat newspaper that is known to brazenly lie to advance democrat narratives. It has no credibility. Much like you, but with a wider reach. And you people have lied so frequently that I you have destroyed any possible will ever have.
You cried wolf far too many times. No one believes you.
Facts are objective. The girl was released from custody. The fed govt wanted her detained and she was released. The Chicago Tribune is hardly a left wing rag.
ICE are a bunch of lying untrained goons. They are not sending their best.
"...And it would be on this board if it wasn't tied to the cult of personality of MAGA..."
And we wonder what it would be like is slimy lying piles of TDS-addled shits would be kind enough to fuck off and die, asswipe.
It's clear from the story, notwithstanding the claims of the defendant's attorney, that she and her son were the aggressors that initiated this event. They were following agents acting within their legal authority and apparently breaking numerous traffic ordinances in their efforts to impede them. They were only there to obstruct. This was not peaceful assembly to petition the government. It was active aggression. As an attorney I would think you'd be able to figure that out. But, alas, you're just another low IQ troll.
That is clearly not authorized use of deadly force. ICE agents are being followed everywhere they go and people are honking and getting in their way. It doesn't give ICE a license to murder people.
Law enforcement rules of engagement don't allow deadly force for being inconvenienced or annoyed. The claims of the attorney were from an agents bodycam who is in the car with the psycho shooter. If they weren't true, the govt attorney would have clearly pointed it out to the Court.
If those obstructing them don’t stand down, and do not accept orders to do so, there will be escalating use of force. Just like with any law enforcement. If you democrats are too batshit stupid to understand that, tough shit.
The fed govt's lawyers are losing credibility in the federal courts every single day. In IL and everywhere across the country. The DOJ fired all the competent people and the ethical one's are voluntarily leaving.
That leaves what? Get used to losing and whatever benefit of the doubt the DOJ had.
You notice at Comey's arraignment in Eastern Dist of Virginia that the two DOJ lawyers were from N. Carolina??? Huh. Surprised nobody local would take the assignment given how trivial and easy it is to do an arraignment. Just another sign of the clown show. Trump didn't even have his handpicked beauty pageant attorney do it. Perhaps because she doesn't know how? Insurance law is the same as federal criminal procedure, right??
Let me guess -- you consider it ethical to manufacture a fake connection of a Presidential rival to a foreign leader so that you could spy on his campaign and harass him with "investigations" that will go nowhere because there is nothing to be found.
I refuse to be lectured of ethics by someone who spent four years lying to us about the medical condition of a President -- even though it was clear to anyone who has eyes to see that said President was incapable even early in the Primary process -- and I refuse to believe anything you claim happened, for the same reason.
The Trib isn’t even worth using as bird cage liner anymore.
It's like holding an orange and you saying, "SEE? IT'S AN APPLE? HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THAT'S AN APPLE?"
I makes us all wonder what's wrong with you. Like, in your brain.
This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers
That utterance is a terrorist attack by the federal govt on everyone who is hearing such nonsense.
You prefer to safe terror attack for the Jews, right?
We don’t agree on this.
That is exactly what terrorists say.
As a democrat, you are a terrorist and/or terror supporter.
Do you not understand that?
Haven’t seen that attributed to antifa before.
They're resisting. Do what you gotta do, 5-0.
Really? When and where?
I don't know, just go with it. You'll thank me later.
Guaranteed, I won’t. I oppose authoritarian government and corrupt law enforcement acts (and officers). MAGA revels in it.
As he defends Pritzker and Johnson, lmao.
You’ll have to try to explain how Pritzker and Johnson are acting in an authoritarian manner or encouraging corrupt law enforcement acts and officers. Because they aren’t doing either.
"and I did time?" ~~ Blago
https://www.newyorker.com/cartoons/daily-cartoon/monday-october-6th-deployed-protests
He literally didn't call for anyone to be arrested. He said they should be in jail. He has every right to think that. Wake us up when he actually attempts to arrest them.. you jackasses.
If Trump said he thought that only NY style pizza should be served at pizzerias, Sarc and most of the other retarded clowns here would be shrieking that he’s a dictator.
And they do so despite the fact that he's right on the subject.
Really? Which law did they break, exactly? Where and when did they break such a law?
Pineapple doesn't belong on pizza. Also, if you have a huge deep crust, you're not eating pizza - you're eating savory cake with tomato and cheese icing. And if you eat it with a fork, you're a fag.
So you’ve got nothing. Got it.
What is it you want exactly? "If Trump said he thought that only NY style pizza should be served at pizzerias," as SCOTUS said, he'd be absolutely right.
Doesn't mean he can force it into existence, but it's not "dictatorial" to say things that are true.
I would like you to tell me which law they broke, when they broke it, and where it happened. That’s as clear as it gets.
Your weird pizza thing doesn’t even make sense as an analogy .
Yes, he has the right to think that. At the same time, powerful people have a moral duty to be prudent with what they say.
You know what, I say Trump should pull ICE out of all Illinois completely. Say "Fine, you want illegals, you can have them." Instead of detention facilities, just bus them in like Florida and Texas were doing.
Tell them they can do whatever they want so long as they stay in Illinois. Maybe give them a gps so they know where they are. And for added funny, file lawsuits against Illinois if the state fails to feed and house them.
This is what the people voted for, let them get it good and hard!
Brandon Johnson is one corrupt mayor put in place by the Chicago teacher's union, another very corrupt outfit. Crime has only worsened in that city and after Johnson ordered the shut down of the Shot Spotter system, has made it more difficult to locate shootings and a number of people found murdered where the system would have at least made police aware of the crime.
Pritzker is just as corrupt time to investigate his dealings that made him so wealthy. and he like his gimmegrants no matter if they're gang bangers, child molesters, rapists or drug traffickers.
Chicago to date:
Shot and killed:297
Shot and wounded: 1291
Total Shot: 1588
Total Homicides: 356
Repeat offenders are many even while on probation and under electronic monitoring; https://cwbchicago.com/2025/10/22-years-for-carjacking-victim-while-on-electronic-monitoring-for-shooting-at-sheriffs-deputy.html
“ Crime has only worsened in that city”
Weird. The statistics say the exact opposite. You know that a - in front of a number means less, not more? Right?
https://www.theglobalstatistics.com/chicago-crime-statistics/
“ Pritzker is just as corrupt time to investigate his dealings that made him so wealthy.”
He is the heir to the Hyatt hotel fortune. What exactly should be investigated, his birth certificate?
“ Repeat offenders are many even while on probation and under electronic monitoring”
Yes, genius. It’s called recidivism and it happens all over the country, all the time. Linking an anecdotal story about a recidivist in Chicago instead of a recidivist in Alabama doesn’t make it a Chicago-based problem.
News Flash: Mayor Brandon Johnson has now gone full crazy:
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/deranged-chicago-mayor-declares-hes-defending-humanity-trump
The TDS is strong in this one.
On the other hand, Trump should do nothing with that waste of space and let Chicago circle the drain, since the Mayor and his cohorts appear to be allowing it to do so.
Yup......leave Chicago to its own devices. Let it turn into a dump worse than Baltimore, that is if it can get any worse, as businesses leave, as stores close and the police are berated by this clownish mayor who has no business being in that office much less anything else other than a stooge for the teachers union.
Forget about Chicago. Let it go to hell and wall it off from the rest of the country.
Unfortunately, our economy depends on our major cities maintaining a minimal level of functionality. We can't afford to let them go full Escape From New York, as emotionally satisfying as that would be.
Somewhere in the Federalist Papers is a passage to the effect that the fed.gov. will defend citizens against abuses by the States, *and vice versa*. The supremacy clause makes the latter rare, so it's gratifying to see an example.