States Are Banning Retail Sales of Dogs and Cats. It's Doing More Harm Than Good.
"By [activists'] own measurements, these bans aren't successful," says lobbyist Alyssa Miller-Hurley. "What they are successful at is fundraising."

When Mike Ricci wanted to buy his daughter a puppy, he discovered that in his state, "There were pet stores but none that sell puppies [or kittens]."
Ricci, being president of Stossel TV, investigated.
He discovered that eight states now ban retail sales of dogs, cats, and rabbits. Animal activists want the bans extended to all states.
They say this is needed to save animals (and protect pet buyers) from abusive puppy mills—places that breed animals over and over, often resulting in inbred and unhealthy puppies.
The activists tell people: buy only from "responsible breeders."
But how does one know who that is?
"Every site says, 'This is the best breeder…ethically sourced. Treated well,'" says Ricci in this week's video.
"They say, 'Don't trust the pet stores!' But am I supposed to be able to figure out from a website which breeder is great?"
Small pet stores "are the experts," says Alyssa Miller-Hurley. She lobbies for them and says most don't sell abused puppies. "Business owners know that you can't survive if you're providing a bad product."
Good point, says Ricci. "Had there been a pet store in my town, I could have gone there and complained, 'Hey, why'd you sell me a bad dog?' I would tell my friends, 'This pet store sells bad dogs! Don't go there.' That store's going to close."
Not so, replies Brian Hackett of the Associated Humane Societies. "Just because they're still in business doesn't mean they're operating humanely."
"So just ban all sales?" I ask.
"Every pet store ordinance or legislation I've worked on," he says, "has overwhelming support from pro-business Republicans and left liberals."
Of course they do. Both parties like pleasing activist groups, especially ones that give money to politicians, and also run dramatic TV ads showing abuse.
But what about the owners of pet stores forced out of business?
Hackett says, "They don't have to sell puppies."
They don't have to sell puppies?
Chains like PetSmart and Petco survive doing that, but many pet stores rely on selling dogs and cats. After all, they're pet stores.
After California banned sales, say pet store advocates, 95 percent of the impacted stores went out of business.
Yet the "ban pet stores" campaign is winning. More states will probably ban pet sales.
But how often does banning things solve a problem?
Animal activists say the bans are the only way to get rid of abusive puppy mills.
But Miller-Hurley points out, "A decade ago, they said there were over 10,000 puppy mills within the United States. Since then, eight states and hundreds of localities have passed these retail sales bans."
The result? They still say there are 10,000 mills.
So "by their own measurements, these bans aren't successful," she continues. "What they are successful at is fundraising….They aren't actually actively engaged in any real animal care."
They aren't?
I thought the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and humane societies run animal shelters!
But they rarely do.
The ASPCA collects more than $300 million in donations but gives only 2 percent of that to shelters. Most of its money goes for advertising and salaries. Its CEO pays himself $1,203,267.
Because New York state bans pet store sales, Ricci ended up driving more than 100 miles to a breeder in Pennsylvania. He's happy with his puppy but has no idea if the breeder treats dogs humanely. He was shown medical records but asks, "How do I know if they were legitimate? They are the first dog medical records I've ever seen."
I agree with his conclusion: Pet store bans do more harm than good.
"There's already laws against animal abuse and neglect. Enforce that. Don't pass new laws."
Banning things that people want rarely works. Prohibition was repealed because it created new problems. The same is already true for pet store sale bans.
After California banned pet store puppy sales, puppy scams surged by 350 percent.
"It is not up to the government to tell people where they can get their animal," complains Miller-Hurley.
Unfortunately, state by state, that's what politicians are doing.
COPYRIGHT 2025 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Pet stores will often nowadays work with the local shelter(s) to adopt out cats and dogs as opposed to the pet store actually selling them. The shelters are then responsible for the animals’ care instead of the pet store.
The cat is out of the bag on that deal.
That is how it works in NYC. They have cute pets on display for adoption, on loan from shelters. They see it as a loss leader as the folks who adopt a pet take home a lot of pet supplies. And it encourages impulse adoption. My wife once went out to buy come cat food and came home with an additional cat.
There are two examples of anti-market hysteria:
* Greedy capitalist pigs simultaneously think of nothing but profits, day in day out, in their dreams and in everything they do while awake. Yet at the same time, these greedy capitalist pigs are too allergic to profit to see all the opportunities to make money in windmills, solar panels, paying women less, and every other lefty cause, leaving leftists no choice but to use government coercion to force the greedy capitalist pigs to make money with subsidies.
* Billionaires are evil because they got their fortunes the old-fashioned way: they earned it satisfying customers' desires. Markets lifted billions out of poverty while socialists murdered 100-200 million civilians, so let's kill the billionaires before they kill the customers who made them rich, because that's what greedy capitalist pigs do.
" Markets lifted billions out of poverty"
True!
" socialists murdered 100-200 million civilians"
Only if you incorrectly count the Fascists as Socialists. It was Mussolini, who loved free markets just as much as Stalin did, who invented the term totalitarian -- for himself. All such totalitarianism is evil.
So you are saying that if I live in one if these states and I want to serve up a delicious Haitian cat salad - I'm going to have to steal someone's pet because purchasing my own cat won't be allowed.
You would have to adopt your salad, not buy or steal.
What if the adoption center has decided I've already adopted enough salads? What if they don't believe my story that 20 salads have already ran away from home? I find these adoption people very intolerant of salads.
One of my first jobs was working for the local Humane Society. One day a man came in and wanted 10 cats. The woman who ran the Shelter freaked out. The man owned a local dairy farm and was looking for barn cats. I had no doubt that the cats would be well cared for, but, her policy was not to let somebody adopt a cat if there was a chance of the cat getting outdoors. A few days later a virus hit the Cat Room and we had to put down around 19 cats. I still think that they would have been better off living in a barn.
At one point in time, Democrats used to support the sale of people.
ENB supports the renting of people.
Would you rent her?
Especially the younglings.
So did members of every other political party. Two of Lincoln's biggest supporters were slaveowners.
Lincoln emancipated the slaves in the Democratic Party controlled states that seceded to retain the Democratic Party’s beloved institution of slavery.
Go fuck yourself slaver.
Haitian immigrants hardest hit.
They can still capture geese and ducks at the park. Plus, the demand side will subside as Trump sends more of them home.
A catastrophe.
A doggone shame.
Not worried about who sells what dog to who. But if you're determined to get a pure bred registered dog so you can social signal your elite status be aware. That animal by definition is inbred. Not necessarily a bad pick but your odds are better just finding a mutt that needs a home.
Great. I'm going to end up with the child of 2 inbreads.
Holy crap, Stossel is dead right. According to their 990 form, part IX, they gave $7million out in grants, the rest of $355 million is salaries, advertising, office and IT expenses, etc. Not much for the sad little puppy on the TV ad.
"I thought the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and humane societies run animal shelters!"
Well, that's complicated. Your Local Humane Societies DO run shelters. In my case, that's the HSMO (Humane Society of Missouri). The national organizations do NOT run shelters. They are just lobbying / activist / advocacy groups that are barely tenuously associated with the ground level charity organizations that actually work with animals. And they rarely have good policy suggestions.
National organizations that don't run shelters but people might think they do:
- Humane Society of the USA (HSUS, now Humane World for Animals, HWFA, used to be called Humane Societies International, HSI)
- ASPCA
- American Humane Society (they set standards for working animals)
- Animal Welfare institute (AWI)
- PETA (the worst)
I think that the Associated Humane Societies is more like the HSMO, just for the state of New Jersey. They still have a conflict of interest, though, because it's easier for them to adopt out their animals if it's more difficult for people to get them elsewhere.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
This is just one example out of thousands.
Rescue dogs and cats are very iffy. There are reasons they were abandoned.
We have three rescue cats. Not iffy at all. One is so friendly to strangers that a neighbor insisted that it can't possibly be a cat!
So is “how much is that doggy in the window” now banned too?
If covered by the Pet Shop Boys, yes.
I was thinking of the scene at the end of Pink Flamingoes
Animal activists say the bans are the only way to get rid of abusive puppy mills.
Just like banning alcohol made everybody sober.
Just like banning drugs stopped addiction.
Just like banning gambling made everybody rich.
Just like banning abortion stopped women from getting them.
Just like banning guns stops shootings.
Just like speed limits stops wrecks.
Just like occupational liscenses stop fraud.
Just like age verification stops kids from seeing porn.
Just like truancy laws made sure everybody graduates.