Americans Like Drugs. Killing Drug Traffickers Won't Change That.
Most U.S. drug traffickers are Americans, but the president is ordering extrajudicial maritime killings while ignoring the domestic demand that drives the market.

On Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal published an article titled "America Loves Cocaine Again—Mexico's New Drug King Cashes In." It's a detailed account of the return of cocaine amid a recent drop in fentanyl use by Americans. "Cocaine sold in the U.S. is cheaper and as pure as ever for retail buyers," according to the article. The drug has seen a 154 percent increase in consumption since 2019.
For a variety of reasons, the U.S. is the most significant illicit drug market in the world, with the most drug users. Though 45 percent of Americans describe the problem of drugs in the U.S. as "extremely serious," drug use is a growing trend. About 25 percent of Americans reported past-year use of "illicit drugs" in 2024—an increase of three percentage points since 2021—according to the 2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
Many Americans have gone from tolerance of psychoactive drug use to active participation at scale, and demand is edging up. However, public drug use and the rise in fentanyl overdoses in cities such as Portland, Oregon, San Francisco, and Baltimore have spurred public outcry. Given that the country's annual drug overdose death rate doubled between 2015 and 2023, it makes sense that 52 percent of Americans feel the U.S. is "losing ground on the illegal drug problem," according to a Gallup poll.
It appears the president agrees. On September 15, President Donald Trump posted a video on his Truth Social account showing U.S. forces killing three people during the destruction of another alleged drug boat in the Caribbean. Two weeks ago, a similar strike killed 11 people on a vessel the Trump administration alleged belonged to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
While the president has justified these strikes as a necessary escalation against "extremely violent drug trafficking cartels" that he claims "POSE A THREAT to U.S. National Security, Foreign Policy, and vital U.S. Interests," data indicate that drug trafficking, like drug use, is predominantly a domestic issue.
Out of 12,004 nationwide drug trafficking convictions, 78 percent (9,362) involved U.S. citizens, according to the Cato Institute. The trend remains even in regions along the Southwest border, typically seen as cartel havens, where U.S. citizens account for nearly 72 percent of drug trafficking convictions. Similarly, in the Gulf of Mexico and districts along the Caribbean, U.S. citizens account for 68 percent of convicted drug traffickers.
In July, the president signed the HALT Fentanyl Act, which permanently classifies fentanyl-related substances as a Schedule I drug under the Controlled Substances Act. The president has repeatedly cited fentanyl trafficking as justification for his positions on tariffs and immigration. However, most of the fentanyl seizures by U.S. authorities happen at legal ports of entry, and data from the U.S. Sentencing Commission show 86 percent of those sentenced for trafficking fentanyl were U.S. citizens.
Given the data on who's doing the trafficking and the president's frank statement to Fox News that "you'll never really solve the drug problem unless you do what other countries do, and that's the death penalty for drug dealers," it's understandable to question the effects on Americans of this escalation in the war on drugs. Only a few countries carry out executions for drug trafficking offenses; the list includes human rights luminaries like Singapore, Malaysia, Iran, and Brunei.
Director of Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute, David Bier, describes the president's legal authority for the strikes as fictitious. "If this is an act of war, then Congress must authorize it under the Constitution," says Bier. "But it's not an act of war since the combatants are defined by their criminal violations of U.S.-controlled substances laws, and the law spells out the consequences for those offenses. Moreover, the president is…intentionally killing the people on the boats, which shows that this isn't about the substances being trafficked, but rather illegally raising the penalty for drug trafficking to capital punishment."
For decades, the U.S. spent billions exporting the same extrajudicial method of drug control recently carried out by the Trump administration, without credible evidence of a dent in domestic drug consumption.
Since most traffickers to the U.S. are citizens, killing suspects at sea is a hollow show—attacking supply while ignoring the demand that fuels it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Killing Drug Traffickers Won't Change That.
Are you certain?
All drugs should be decriminalized using the same legislation to eliminate all forms of govt welfare.
Decriminalized or legalized? They’re not the same thing.
I’d rather they be treated like say water than tobacco.
Packed in a plastic bottle?
They should be free to choose their coffin material.
+1 Lined up and see how many of them a round from a .50 BMG can penetrate?
Decriminalized or legalized? They’re not the same thing.
And most people get them backwards.
Americans like shoplifting. Arresting shoplifters won't stop that.
Americans like free money for no work. Charging for fraud won't stop that.
Democrats like killing conservatives. Arresting murderers won't stop that.
Speak for yourself.
And I'm still waiting for evidence on those supposed smugglers.
>> while ignoring the domestic demand that drives the market.
you seek more Draconian measures about domestic demand?
I don't really care Margaret. Since we can arrest American smugglers we don't need to blow up their boats.
Why can't we do both?
Since we can arrest American smugglers we don't need to blow up their boats.
You aren't at all aware of what goes into apprehending these or people like these at sea are you?
This is once again, like "bans" on gambling or reading sex books to children at the school library. Nobody has ever been or will be busted for a wager among friends or ordering Gender Queer off of Amazon and reading it to their kids at home. No librarian will ever be fired and convicted for accidentally shelving a book in the wrong section. The Coast Guard isn't stopping people on their sailboat with a kilo of hash on their annual sailing trip to Cozumel.
Routine radar patrols of shipping lanes pick up the boats a couple dozen times every year. Pilots recognize individual boats by their path of travel. Hundreds of pounds, if not tons, of opioids and guns. Visual confirmation of drugs and guns from outside the range of engagement. What's not hidden under tarps or hull modifications or other countermeasures anyway.
The people on the boats shield the motors with their bodies to try to prevent the Coast Guard from shooting them out. Typically the people are detained and eventually deported and their boat, with the engines disabled, and drugs are set on fire and sank at the scene. As you can imagine (or maybe not), not everybody laying on the engines of a boat moving at 40+ knots in the middle of the ocean in order to prevent them from being shot makes it.
Americans Like Drugs.
This is a lie you tell yourself by playing with numbers. The fact of the matter is, that only a small, very insulated subset of Americans - ones who rarely leave their own echo chambers - like drugs.
Normal people, ie. the average parent who fights an uphill battle to steer their kids away; the average motorist who doesn't want someone stoned out of his gourd weaving around on the highway; the average; the average businessman or manager who wants sober productivity from his staff; the average medical provider or first responder who has to deal with their constant messes of abuse and addiction: they don't like drugs.
Because they see the overall harm drugs do to a society as a significantly greater negative than the average smackhead (or cokehead or pothead, not that there's a meaningful difference between them) finds his short-lived high a positive.
And why should we listen to the smackhead's perspective on things in the first place? Screw the druggies.
Oh, and please, spare us the BS response, "BUH WUH BOUT THE BOOZES?" Apples and zebras, that comparison. America has long proven that it can drink in moderation. Just like it has long proven that it cannot, and will not, do the same with drug addiction.
What are you talking about? Alcoholism causes at least as much trouble as drugs like cocaine, heroin, meth, etc. Maybe not in ways that are so concentrated in certain places or situations, but it is far more widespread.
Alcoholism are generally much easier to deal with than a meth addict. With the exception of Sarc.
Have you ever had to deal with a severe alcoholic? I'm not convinced that what you say is true.
I've never known a severe alcoholic to steal a 1,000 tank of anhydrous ammonia. I've never known a severe alcoholic to steal a stranger's car and light it on fire to cover up their crime. The best man at my wedding destroyed his liver and died before he was 40 but we're not entirely convinced his problem was strictly related to alcohol.
IME, on average alcoholics are less violently antisocial than their other drug-addicted (save for weed and some other downers/sedatives) peers.
Ive dealt with a family member who was an alcoholic and one addicted to drugs. The latter walked through glass doors and ended up in a hospital before killing himself later. The prior has been clean a number of years.
After normalizing for the number of users?
I suppose it's valid to look at it both ways for different reasons. Yes, hard drugs are more likely to be big problems for users and those around them than alcohol. But the overall harm associated with alcohol use is higher.
Yes, alcohol is different from a lot of drugs in that it has been part of our culture forever and there are more people who use alcohol moderately and responsibly than do with meth or opioids. My main point is that it isn't categorically different than "drugs" in general. It is a drug, and one that can get you seriously fucked up and is very addictive for a lot of people.
The reason that alcohol is accepted while other drugs are not is that it is widely agreed that Prohibition did more harm than good. That same consensus does not seemingly exist for cocaine and opiates.
Alcohol is a weird beast , anyway. There’s arguments to be that alcohol, as a social lubricant, is more of a societal good than a negative. How many times do you hear the phrase “Wouldn't mind sharing a drink with that guy?” Or just the general concept of guys bonding over a beer? It brings people together even if the drink itself is just an excuse to be social.
The properties of alcohol are also interesting in terms of teaching useful values. You feel good and relaxed while drinking and it perhaps encourages you to drink more, but when you overindulge, you suffer. It causes actual pain in a way that creates a feedback loop. Moderation is a good societal value and alcohol inherently teaches it in a way that other substances do not. And there’s countless people who have vomited after too much hard spirits and they have a permanent aversion to vodka or gin or tequila. So in some ways excessive drinking is a self-correcting issue.
A lot of the same things in your last paragraph apply to other drugs as well. I think what a lot of people overlook is that some people are prone to addiction and some are not. Every alcoholic has had lots of painful experiences with alcohol. Every junkie has dealt with the pain of withdrawals, ODs, etc. Most people who drink don't become drunks and similarly, most people who dabble with cocaine or even heroin don't become degenerate addicts.
I do agree with what you say about alcohol for the most part. It's easier to use in moderation than hard drugs. But in large quantities, it is a pretty heavy drug.
"hard drugs are more likely to be big problems for users and those around them than alcohol"
On the other hand, the number of deaths from the acute effects of smoking marijuana is zero.
I’m California sober…alcohol has too many calories and the hangovers became too much at a certain age. I also think I had long Covid which made the hangovers worse although I just saw it as another reason to cut back. I’m never going back to drinking multiple drinks on a daily basis.
You aren't measuring for rates of toxicity and addiction.
First, it takes more alcohol to reach an inebriated state than drugs.
It takes more alcohol over longer periods of time to reach toxicity and while absolute numbers, alcohol addicts may outnumber drug addicts, but by population of users, the rate of addiction is not that high.
Drugs have much lower levels of toxicity, meaning a toxic load is reached on far less. Inebriation occurs on far less and far higher rates of addiction exist within the population.
These are part of the reason why alcohol has survived to BE part of cultures around the world but drug use has been relegated to the ghetto of society. It's far more self destructive than alcohol is by population usage rate.
Your standard of abuse would relegate sugar to being a drug because it's toxic, addictive, and it's effects can be devastating and costly and there's an epidemic of obesity and diabetes that prove it.
Insane. You say there is little difference between a pothead and crackhead but then say alcohol is a whole different animal. Thats not how it works. You can't say all drug addicts are similar but then leave out alcoholics.
Oh and you'll note that cocaine use has risen by 154% in the last 6 years. There might be more people who hate drugs, but that doesn't mean the demand isn't real.
Ok, boomer.
The very simple and succinct argument is America outlawed booze (it took a constitutional amendment FFS) for all of the stupid arguments you make above. America repealed the booze prohibition because they realized prohibition doesn't work.
The first federal gun control sprouted because stupid people banned booze. Those for fail to learn from history...
The homeless problem in San Francisco and DC, among other places indicates that drug users have become a tremendous social burden having bad effect on everyone's quality of life that ignoring them only exacerbates. Saying that people like drugs is trite and flippant in ignoring a real issue.
Maybe trite but still true. And the worst problems are in Southern Appalachia. Deep red Trump country.
Yes, and all of those bad things happened under drug prohibition. And didn't really exist before drug prohibition. Now, I'm not saying that getting rid of prohibition will magically erase those problems. It won't. And that's largely because the drug use is more a symptom than a cause. People with their shit together don't want to sit around all day smoking fentanyl or whatever, even if they enjoy the effects. And most of the degenerate street junkies wouldn't be productive members of society if we could somehow eliminate the illegal drugs.
The first federal gun control sprouted because stupid people banned booze. Those for fail to learn from history...
Other side of the script. Totalitarian bans didn't and won't work. A risk-first approach that blows up hundred-million-dollar shipments of drugs from organizations "better known for extortion and assassination" while allowing Mom-and-Pop Dime Bag, sail to Pureto Vallarta and back is a/the actually libertarian way to 'prohibit' drugs.
Third side of the coin that I continue to point out and that others are rightly hinting at: "Drugs are really popular so we should just legalize them." isn't a more rational or reasonable stance. People used to raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars with a trunk full of guns and a social network aren't just going to fill out an application at Starbucks or learn to code as their income dries up... the same way Mafiosos didn't just start working on assembly lines and at office jobs once Prohibition ended.
"The fact of the matter is, that only a small, very insulated subset of Americans - ones who rarely leave their own echo chambers - like drugs."
As is typical, you have no idea what you are talking about. Drugs have devastated entire regions of the US.
Ah... another MAGA-on-MAGA disagreement on which lies to tell. The sockpuppet klan hoods keep the totalitarians from recognizing and shooting each other. This is Reason's way of letting the thugs inoculate us against constant dinning and brainwash.
Altruist Totalitarians still recite Harry Anslinger 1914 Cocaine Naygurs headlines though Jack Johnson hasn't beaten a white lamb pugilist in many decades. Never do they admit the plant product is not a narcotic, is non-habit-forming, non-addictive and that users do not progressively increase doses to compensate for atrophying body functions. The lies are not even falsifiable precisely because thugs will jail you for exposing the looter State's lies--lies that keep the proles puffing Victory cigarettes and guzzling Victory gin.
The answer is to allow competing drug cartels to duke it out amongst themselves. The shootouts between competing drug cartels should eventually take care of the problem. Of course any innocent people caught up in the wars can be labeled as collateral damage.
After all, the Obiden administration had the right idea, allow as many illegal aliens/drug traffickers/ human traffickers/ gang-bangers/ rapists, murderers, child molesters and other assorted criminals into the country then sit back and watch the chaos ensue.
With 300,000 missing children, the Obiden administration can claim victory for liberalism.
Would it be wrong to celebrate when ole Joe receives his fianal send off?
On September 15, President Donald Trump posted a video on his Truth Social account showing U.S. forces murdering three people during the destruction of another alleged drug boat in the Caribbean. Two weeks ago, a similar strike murdered 11 people on a vessel the Trump administration alleged belonged to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua.
FTFY.
It's not a defence to murder that the victim was not a good guy.
Is TdA classified as an FTO?
Still find it strange you celebrated Officer Byrd killing a veteran in a blind shoot but are outraged about an FTO.
It is to Trump and his defenders who judge everything based upon who, not what.
Facts are illegal now. Just try airing the exact literal stuff Cartman Kirk belched at college girls ignorant of how premises affect conclusions.
Not good? By what standard? The most heroic of the Founding Fathers were smugglers selling what people were willing and able to pay for despite the violence of predatory usurpations. H.L Mencken said it all: "Here are the heroes‑‑gallant, lawless, picturesque, adventurous, noble. Let the youth of the land be taught to venerate them. They make the cowboys who linger in the movies look like puny Christian Endeavorers; they are the only Olympians left in a decayed and flabby land, or in the seas that hedge it 'round. Who will be the first poet to sing them? "
>Most U.S. drug traffickers are Americans,
No, most drug traffickers *in America* are American.
I am pretty confident that the people running drug organizations in Mexico, Latin America, Asia, etc are not American.
(Emphasis added.)
Following up on Incunabulum's observation.
1.) Your figures only prove that, within the US, American citizens represent the majority of drug trafficking convictions. That is, the majority of traffickers that got caught. Your figures, however, do not demonstrate that the majority of all traffickers within the US are American citizens. It is a fair extrapolation to say that the conviction figures suggest that conclusion, but they do not prove it since they cannot account for the unknowable number that did not get caught.
2.) The latter statement is not supported by the prior figures whatsoever. The preceding figures are for trafficking within the US not to the US.
Also the most common action when finding non citizens attempting transport at the border is a turn around and documenting them for arrest if they do it again.
Cato has been playing this intentionally lying by filtering on convictions game for years. They know what the actions are the border are and hope you dont as they lie to you by omission.
Note to foreign readers: Government sockpuppets flock here to tell Americans to pay them to shoot people over any and all enjoyable plants--especially if harmless. To them, goons with guns breaking doors and killing folks is SAFE. Major financial prohibition crashes as in 1907, 1929, 1933, 1972-3, 1987, 1992, 2008 are all good compared to someone, somewhere, lighting a joint. Goading foreign governments into murdering their people is their policy, even after such sprees got Hitler elected and turned Germany and Japan against the League of Nations prohibition plank. WAR IS PEACE!
Legal production and commercialization is the only way to get organized crime out of the business. That assumes that the politicians will grow a brain and stop taxing recreational drugs out of the market.
Gangstas are not the problem. Dope bans make the product sell for 4x as much--almost all imported. The dollars spent on thusly inflated drugs come back from abroad presented for gold at government exchange rates. Bert Hoover was surprised when this happened in 1933, when he was using the League of Nations to ban harmless plants AND addictive opiates worldwide. Nixon acted just as surprised when it happened on his Quaker quackery watch. The Quing were surprised when after it collapsed China's economy, civil wars caused 25 million deaths there. Jackson and Van Buren were shocked at the Panic when Britain cashed out all U.S. investments to gear up for opium wars.
When I was in the Haight there was NO cocaine whatsoever, not even for curiosity seekers wondering what else the government was lying about. The Nixon laws in quick succession wrecked the economy, took us off the gold standard, instituted government subsidies for looter party candidates, exported globally totalitarian bans on non-toxic, non-habit-forming psychedelics. Republicans and Wallace Dems then acted surprised that cocaine returned--and way more popular than it had been in 1903 when there were no mystical drug laws.
For every initiation of deadly force, there is unequal yet apposite reprisal force. New Yorkers doubtless remember the Mohammedan response to Christian National Socialist prohibitions exported abroad... Every American is still groped by the Transport Sozialist Arbeiterpartei goons as airlines collapse into bankruptcy, thanks to superstitious bigot enactments dislodging the rule of law.