Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Cigarettes

With Cigarette Taxes Sky High, More New Yorkers Than Ever Turn to the Black Market

In New York City, just one in six cigarette packs collected by researchers came through legal channels.

J.D. Tuccille | 9.17.2025 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
A pale yellow background with a carton of cigarettes and a red arrow pointing upward | Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Songquan Deng | Dreamstime.com | Midjourney
(Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Songquan Deng | Dreamstime.com | Midjourney)

In 2023, New York raised its cigarette excise tax by $1.00 to $5.35 per pack. New York City imposes its own tax of $1.50 per pack, and that's before you include federal and sales taxes, making for the most expensive smokes in the country. That is, cigarettes are expensive in New York for those who pay those taxes. But state officials were warned that such a high rate would drive consumers to the black market, and that's exactly what happened. According to recent research, more New Yorkers than ever are turning to tax-evading illicit sources for their nicotine needs.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Taxes Into Good Health—or Not

When the New York excise tax was hiked, the Albany Times-Union noted, "it's the nation's highest and brings a pack of cigarettes at many retailers to about $12….Health advocates hailed the increase, saying it will lead to fewer smokers and cancer deaths. Anti-tax groups, though, predicted it will increase trafficking in illicit untaxed cigarettes in the state."

Health advocates like taxing vices on the theory that raising taxes simultaneously generates government revenue while escalating prices for allegedly bad things—like cigarettes—out of reach of many consumers. What they rarely consider is that there are other options, such as buying cigarettes smuggled from jurisdictions with lower levies.

"New York has created a cigarette-smuggling empire, and the worst is yet to come," Todd Nesbit, an economics professor at Ball State University, and Michael LaFaive, of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, warned even before the 2023 tax increase. "It's the unavoidable consequence of the state's decadeslong history of raising the cigarette tax."

"If enacted, consumers will go across borders to do their shopping or rely on black-market suppliers," agreed the Tax Foundation's Adam Hoffer. "Tax revenues will fall, illicit activities will thrive, and law enforcement spending will need to increase."

In fact, as Nesbit, LaFaive, and Hoffer emphasized, even before the dollar-per-pack tax hike, more than half of cigarettes sold in the state of New York lacked local tax stamps and were smuggled from elsewhere. Since 2023, illicit dealers appear to have claimed even more market share.

Illicit Dealers Grow Their Market Share

Using methods used by earlier studies, last year, researchers from Rutgers University gathered discarded cigarette packs in 30 census tracts across all five of New York City's boroughs and checked them for tax stamps. They published their findings last month in BMJ Tobacco Control.

"This study found that in 2024, the percentage of littered packs bearing the proper NYC tax stamp declined to 16.6%. Georgia surpassed Virginia as the primary source of littered cigarettes. Packs with no stamp increased, rivaling Virginia as the second most common type of littered packs."

That means that only about one cigarette pack of every six gathered by the research team in New York City passed through legal channels. The others were smuggled from jurisdictions with much lower taxes, such as Georgia (37 cents per pack), Virginia (60 cents per pack), or else entirely bypassed the legal and taxed supply chain. This result could have been foreseen. It was foreseen. 

Decades of Ignored Warnings

In 2002, when New York City was considering its $1.50 per pack levy, then-Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg harumphed, "If it were totally up to me, I would raise the cigarette tax so high the revenues from it would go to zero" in the expectation that high taxes would drive smokers to quit.

But, as The New York Times reported, people with a little more savvy warned hizzoner, the nanny-stater, not to expect easy compliance from clever human beings who don't care to be socially engineered.

"Richard Lipsky, a lobbyist for the owners of small delis, bodega owners and convenience stores, predicted in an interview that many neighborhood stores would not survive the higher tax as many smokers would buy their cigarettes over the Internet, from Indian reservations, from adjoining states or from smugglers," the Times reported. 

As it turned out, many small shops did better than expected. They were willing to deal with underground wholesalers themselves and stock up on black market cigarettes that they sold to their usual customers. By 2014, city officials found smuggled cigarettes "in 48 percent of bodegas visited in recent inspections," according to a later Times story. The reason for the booming illegal trade was obvious. 

"In early 2002, the city, the state and the federal government collected a combined $15.80 in taxes on every carton of cigarettes sold here," Michael Wilson noted in that piece. "Today, that number is $68.60, or almost $7 a pack. With the increases in taxes, more packs flowed up from the South, in cars and overstuffed minivans and in the underside luggage compartments of passenger buses" to escape taxes.

The 2023 tax hike did nothing to change economic incentives for customers, for store owners, or for the smuggling networks that keep them supplied with comparatively affordable smokes. Every increase in tax raises the potential profits to be made by working outside the law to satisfy demand. Worse, in their 2023 column, Nesbit and LaFaive cautioned that those people who could be deterred from smoking by high taxes had long ago been reached, and that little more benefit could be expected. 

"The people who still buy cigarettes are dedicated smokers: Their preference for smoking overcomes the deterrent power of any levy. If these people are told to pay even more, they have a greater reason to buy smuggled cigarettes."

Unfortunately, that led to enforcement escalation. The face of that escalation is Eric Garner, who was killed in a confrontation that began when police approached him on suspicion of selling loose, untaxed cigarettes. A vice-tax policy championed by nanny-state health advocates as a means of weaning Americans from the deadly consequences of smoking proves to have deadly consequences itself.

Drop Prohibition by Another Name

Jeffrey Singer, an Arizona-based surgeon and senior fellow at the Cato Institute, has a better idea.

"Instead of chasing bootleggers, drop the tax rate," he suggests. "Jack up taxes high enough, and it's just prohibition by another name—and prohibition always delivers the same package: black markets, corruption, and violence."

That's good advice. But weaning nanny staters from their addiction to vice taxes may be harder than getting smokers to kick their nicotine habit.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Sunflower Showdown

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

CigarettesNew York CityBlack MarketsConsumer FreedomTaxes
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (45)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   2 months ago

    Regarding draconian tobacco taxes, doubt NY will turn over a new leaf.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      An actual pun generator you are.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Tobacco puns are a pipe dream.

        1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

          Sometimes a cigar is only a cigar, taxes paid or not.

    2. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

      I was hoping the cigarette tax here would go up in smoke but no such luck.

  2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    Fuck puritans.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      Lay off me ancestors. And these asshats aren't Puritans, anyway.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Settle down, pilgrim. I was referring to lower case "p" pilgrims, i.e. anyone who declares sinful behavior and then uses the power of the state to punish sinners.

        1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

          pilgrims, or puritans?

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Once a month, from behind, for procreation only.

  3. Kemuel   2 months ago

    For all New Yorkers claim to be progressive, this is a tax on the lower classes. It falls particularly on immigrants coming from the Middle East and Eastern Europe where smoking is more culturally accepted.

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      So the democrat cigarette taxes are racist?

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      If a New Yorker wants to put a fag in their mouth, they’ll have to pay.

    3. NCMB   2 months ago

      The rich don’t pay their fair share of cigarette taxes.

    4. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      But "Health advocates hailed the increase, saying it will lead to fewer smokers and cancer deaths."

      They did their job, where only good intentions matter. In their academic/ medical world, there is no such thing as black markets. They simply do not exist.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Or personal autonomy and freedom of choice.

        1. charliehall   2 months ago

          Smokers take away MY freedom by increasing MY health insurance costs. The cigarette tax probably isn't high enough to ameliorate this.

          1. rbike   2 months ago

            Opposite. Smokers die quicker and cheaper.

          2. Sir Chips Alot   2 months ago

            obesity kills more than smoking has ever killed. It is the main driver of your health insurance going up. When are you going to start forcing diets on everyone...or i guess all the inflation caused by you low IQ brainwashed far left Democrat cultists is how you plan on doing it?

            1. python33   2 months ago

              Bingo!

    5. charliehall   2 months ago

      MAGA says that all immigrants need to immediately assimilate into American culture and give up their foreign practices.

    6. JasonT20   2 months ago

      ...where smoking is more culturally accepted.

      There are a lot of things that are "more culturally accepted" in other parts of the world that I regularly hear conservatives telling immigrants that they shouldn't do. That they should assimilate with American culture instead. Why not drop something with such obvious negative health costs, high financial costs, and negligible personal enjoyment? Cigarettes are an easy and quick nicotine delivery vehicle. I could never understand how anyone got any pleasure from smoking them, aside from whatever physical and psychological effects they get from satisfying the cravings of their addiction.

      If immigrants don't want to pay higher cigarette costs here, they can stay in the countries where cigarettes are a lot cheaper. (And higher taxes can't explain all of the difference in prices. Some of it has to be coming from corporations deciding that they can get more from smokers in America, so they will. But it is still profitable to sell for a fraction of the price, wholesale, before factoring in taxes, in developing countries.)

  4. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Fightin' the system like a true modern day Robin Hood

  5. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    When everything is illegal, everyone is a criminal.

    Maybe the findings are due to the fact that the people who don't break the law in regard to taxes also don't break the law by littering. Did they control the study for that?

    Maybe it is just New York and no one cares.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      Always question "studies show" and "experts agree." That's the first clue you're being lied to.

  6. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

    Simple solution here. Legislate laws not only against selling illegal cigarettes, but criminalize the use of them too, with stiff penalties and mandatory incarceration. Get more public sentiment behind it by declaring a war on tobacco [it is, after all, for your own good]. And then when some dumb bastards try to smuggle them in by boat, blow them out of the water. That'll send a message.

    And if/when this fails, blame other states with "lax cigarette laws."

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

      Allow people with illegal cigarettes to eat them if they want to avoid paying a $1000 fine per ciggie.

    2. charliehall   2 months ago

      Trump will send the military to murder smugglers of illegal cigarettes .

  7. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    Another thought - -
    When will NY decide the problem is bad enough they have to start passing out free vape machines?

  8. NoVaNick   2 months ago

    Last time I was in NYC a couple of years ago, I smelled much more weed smoke than tobacco smoke. That said, this article seems dated now. The nannies have realized that they can’t get any more smokers to quit through higher taxes and indoor/outdoor bans on smoking and are now eyeing “tobacco-free” generation laws, where those born after a certain year will not be able to legally purchase any tobacco products, including vapes or zyn pouches. Some Boston suburbs have already done this and I’m sure NYC won’t be far behind. I’m sure it will be as big a success as the drug war and prohibition were, and might also very well kill any hopes that more younger people will vote Democrat.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      Now that's a good take; very optimistic, but good.

    2. charliehall   2 months ago

      There seems to be a bit less weed today than a few years ago. The government started cracking down on hundreds of illegal weed shops.

  9. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    I am disappoint that 2chili didn't bring in his forefathers' bootlegging. Those stories are fun, and they are his legacy to honor.

  10. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

    Isn't this how the Eric Garner story got started ?

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 months ago

      Smok'n or selling 'em; either way you can't breathe.

  11. charliehall   2 months ago

    It was Mike Bloomberg who got the cigarette tax increased initially. It resulted in fewer people smoking. A rare tax that unquestionably benefits the public.

    Yes, it is an infringement on freedom. But it is an infringement on MY freedom to have MY health insurance premiums increase to provide medical care for all the smokers who end up hospitalized with lung cancer, other cancers, emphysema, COPD, heart attacks, strokes, peripheral vascular disease, and other problems caused by inhaling poisons into your lungs dozens of times a day.

    1. JasonT20   2 months ago

      I wouldn't call that an infringement on our "freedom". It is definitely a situation where tobacco companies want to continue to reap profits from their addicted customers while all of society bears the costs.

      The customers bear both the wholesale cost that gives the producers their profits as well as the costs of taxes, all people with insurance bear the costs of higher insurance premiums, all taxpayers bear the costs of medical care for illnesses caused by smoking that aren't covered by private insurance, the whole economy bears the costs associated with lost productivity from workers not able to work due to those illnesses, and the families of people that become ill or die from tobacco-related diseases bear the costs of caring for or mourning them. Of course, the tobacco users themselves bear the costs to their health and their wallets directly.

      There is no product made or service rendered that has the scale of people consuming it and the scale of profits that the tobacco industry has, while providing such a poor cost/benefit ratio for its users. Nothing legal comes to mind with that bad of a deal that is even much smaller in scale. The costs to society make it even more ludicrous that people do this at all. It is certainly ridiculous for anyone to whine about taxing it like their fundamental liberty was being infringed.

    2. Sir Chips Alot   2 months ago

      obesity kills more than smoking has ever killed. It is the main driver of your health insurance going up. When are you going to start forcing diets on everyone...or i guess all the inflation caused by you low IQ brainwashed far left Democrat cultists is how you plan on doing it?

  12. JasonT20   2 months ago

    In Florida, cigarette taxes are less than $2 a pack. But a pack of Marlboro is still $9-11. On the other hand, you can buy a pack of Marlboro for less than $2 in Paraguay.

    So, what really drives the high cost of cigarettes, even in states with lower taxes? Is it the taxes? Or is it just that tobacco companies can get its addicted customers to pay more here, so they do?

    As for smuggling, tobacco companies have been heavily fined for it themselves. R.J. Reynolds paid $325 million in a settlement with Canada in 2010. I doubt any of their execs got put in chokeholds by cops, though.

    That's good advice. But weaning nanny staters from their addiction to vice taxes may be harder than getting smokers to kick their nicotine habit.

    After referencing cigarettes as "allegedly bad things" when criticizing vice taxes, I also call bullshit on Tuccille giving any fucks about getting smokers to beat their addictions so they will stop giving their money to tobacco corporations in exchange for a lower quality of life and life expectancy.

  13. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

    High, oppressive taxes in the nanny state called New York?
    Who would've thought that?

    1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      People routinely evading taxes? I'm shocked...shocked!

  14. Fred12345   2 months ago

    The solution is to have an exception for government paid healthcare for people that test positive to nicotine, illicit drugs, and who are overweight. Then remove all taxes for cigarettes, weed, and allow all drugs. People would be able to smoke/use all they want but others will not be forced to pay for their healthcare.

  15. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

    See? Even Trump voters like Jadie are beginning to notice the Looter Kleptocracy bans everything so it can tax Victory Cigarettes and sell denatured gin...

  16. AT   2 months ago

    their nicotine needs

    *pinches nose*

    I friggin' can't with you JD.

  17. gordo53   2 months ago

    Organized crime thanks New Yorkers for their patronage. Perhaps it will soon be one stop shopping for recreational drugs and cigarettes.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Pablos Holman on AI, the Future, and Why the World Needs More Energy

Nick Gillespie | From the December 2025 issue

NYC Proposes a Pantry To Give Away Free Pet Food. That Won't Solve the City's Animal Shelter Crisis.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 11.8.2025 7:00 AM

You Can Thank This Ohio Klansman for Expanding Your Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | From the December 2025 issue

Trump Vowed To Stop Crypto Crackdowns. Samourai Wallet Proves He Hasn't.

Joakim Book | 11.7.2025 5:07 PM

This Ruling Does Not Bode Well for Trump's Attempt To Portray Journalism as Consumer Fraud

Jacob Sullum | 11.7.2025 2:40 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300