'Very Touching' Text Messages
Plus: Fed rate cut, Luigi watch, Hep B vaccination changes, and more...

How Robinson was caught: Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old suspect in the murder of conservative pundit Charlie Kirk as he was speaking on Utah Valley University's campus, initially evaded the FBI. But, per charging documents in the case, his mother recognized him via the CCTV pictures released, and called him to ask where he'd been that day; she conferred with his father, who grew suspicious that the description of the rifle used in the shooting matched a rifle Robinson had been given as a gift. According to the Robinson parents' account to investigators, their son had grown more political over the past year and "more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented," having frequent disagreements with them, especially his father.
Robinson, after being repeatedly contacted by his parents, indicated to them that he was suicidal; they convinced him to come to their family home in Washington, Utah, and the parents contacted a family friend who is a retired deputy sheriff who helped call the proper authorities. The retired deputy drove all three Robinsons to Hurricane, Utah, where the sheriff's office is, and investigators met them there.
Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty.
Alleged text messages between Robinson and his romantic partner: These really don't seem real to me, but they were in the charging documents released yesterday by the Utah authorities. Is this how 22-year-olds really text? Robinson seems so bizarre—relatively recently radicalized, not totally estranged from a loving family.
Robinson wrote to his roommate/romantic partner about how the messages on his bullets were "mostly a big meme" and about how he'll hear the "notices bulge" thing on Fox News. pic.twitter.com/mFhvSqk9Fa
— Aric Toler (@AricToler) September 16, 2025
Some, like ABC's Matt Gutman, appear rather enchanted with Robinson and these text messages:
DISGUSTING: ABC's Matt Gutman says he's not sure "if we have seen an alleged murder with such specific text messages" that were "very touching, in a way, that I think many of us didn't expect — a very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect's roommate and the… pic.twitter.com/ulPcxoOwM3
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) September 16, 2025
This feels like "mostly peaceful" Round 2: "very touching" killer. They can just not!
And here's some more cable news clownery, from MSNBC:
MSNBC's Zadrozny: To suggest people on the internet are cheering for the murder of Charlie Kirk is "the total opposite of what's actually happening."
Their lying simply knows no bounds. None. pic.twitter.com/9iz8LLxH4B
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) September 16, 2025
College campus skirmishes: At campus after campus, skirmishes keep erupting over how to honor Kirk—and whether students who oppose Kirk will allow tributes to him to remain up and untouched. Consider this interaction, from the University of North Carolina Wilmington:
Before and after pic.twitter.com/Qk0WvyDSTy
— Nick Craig (@nicholasmcraig) September 16, 2025
And Texas State University appears to have expelled a student who mocked the way Kirk was killed—gleefully reenacting the bullet hitting his neck in front of a memorial that mourning students had set up—and spit on or at TPUSA students while disrupting their event:
This was at Texas State @txst a Charlie Kirk memorial event hosted by local TPUSA chapter. Student imitates Charlie Kirk's death and mocks him, goes up to statue where TPUSA members are and imitates his death again, and spits near them. Also uses a vape/weed pen near end of video… pic.twitter.com/mVOHeh1jpk
— TheTexasOne (@TexasRepublic71) September 16, 2025
I'm a little torn on the nastiness that's emerging in the wake of the Kirk assassination and how it ought to be dealt with. We should give wide berth to expressive acts and have campuses that tolerate speech, even ugly speech that offends many of us. But might vandalism and disrupting a memorial and spitting on fellow students be considered something beyond expression? I'm torn here, and truthfully pretty disgusted by the reactions to Kirk's killing from cable news pundits, college students, online TikTokers—not people I found especially reliable and even-keeled before all this, but…new lows are always possible, I suppose.
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
Scenes from New York: A little offended that the most Reason possible headline appeared in The New York Times: "Strip Club Executives Bribed Tax Auditor With Lap Dances."
QUICK HITS
- "New York State terrorism charges against Luigi Mangione, the defendant in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare's chief executive last year, were dismissed on Tuesday, including a first-degree murder count that could have landed him in prison for the rest of his life," reports The New York Times. "The judge overseeing the case, Gregory Carro, said he had found the evidence behind the charges 'legally insufficient.' Mr. Mangione, 27, also faces federal charges, and is still charged in New York with second-degree murder, for which he faces a sentence of 25 years to life, among nine other counts. Those cases will proceed, though no trial dates have been set.…New York law requires that prosecutors who charge a defendant with terrorism show that the person attempted to intimidate a civilian population, or influence government policy or conduct. Justice [Gregory] Carro said that prosecutors had failed to show that Mr. Mangione sought to do either." People celebrated in the streets.
- Today, the Federal Reserve is expected to cut interest rates, given the weakening labor market.
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), under Robert F. Kennedy Jr., look likely to change the vaccination recommendations for Hepatitis B shots for newborns, making it so that they're no longer the norm. Hep B is an awful viral disease that damages the liver, but it's mostly acquired through sex or needles, and mothers are tested for Hepatitis B during pregnancy, so it has always seemed like overkill to me that newborns must be vaccinated against this when we know their status and their mother's status from the get-go. Ofer Levy of Boston Children's Hospital said the quiet part out loud to The New York Times: "The risk of families falling between the cracks of the health care system may be much higher in the U.S." That's why those shots have long been recommended by the CDC. But this is indicative of so much that's frustrating about public health: There's the expectation that parents be comfortable with assuming some additional risk for the greater good, to ensure no child anywhere slips through the cracks.
- The "Charlie Kirk is a misogynist" line strikes me as so weird and untrue. Is it just that any devout Christian is considered a terrible sexist pig? It's disturbing to me that some large portion of the country is totally unaware of what the other half believes, and so quick to look past their honorable and consistent actions:
The more I think about it, the more I take issue with the "Charlie Kirk was a misogynist" line from parts of the left. What are you talking about? He seemed like a pretty exemplary husband and father. Or is it that any devout Christian is considered a misogynist by these people?
— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) September 16, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Was/Were?
Utah County District Attorney Jeff Gray announces he will be seeking the death penalty for Charlie Kirk's killer
Transexual chaser and Far-Left militant suspect is being charged with the following:
Count 1: aggravated murder
Count 2: felony discharge of a firearm
- Bellum Acta
If convicted and sentenced, the rainbow cultist suspect will face the firing squad. His last moment on Earth would be guys dumping loads into him.
This is exactly what the death penalty is for. If it were up to me though, I'd lock the punk up in solitary confinement, incommunicado, with no access to reading or writing materials, on a bread and water ration for the rest of his life, with an option for hara-kiri after no less than 20 years.
-jcr
Rough, but I agree with the sentiment. As far as punishment fitting the crime, a life lost for a life taken seems about right.
Of course the other side of punishment should be to serve as a deterrent to those who would imitate [and I am sure there are quite a few wanting to follow suit, and pundits and executives are a lot less protected than government officials]; and to those types he will be their own martyr. What kind of punishment would diminish that likely outcome? A firing squad [not that he doesn't deserve it] would solidify his canonization amongst the crazies.
Lobotomy?
Seriously, turning a militant into a drooling idiot might make for a less appealing martyr. Especially if the idiot can be conditioned to become a lap dog for the "enemy".
That's Game of Thrones level punishment. Might work.
And based on what we know about human beings, he'd fight to avoid the death penalty so he could have that.
These really don't seem real to me, but they were in the charging documents released yesterday by the Utah authorities.
NEW CONSPIRACY THEORY JUST DROPPED.
"Fact check on aisle seven"
"Is this how 22-year-olds really text?"
Probably not, but it may well be how crazy 22-year-olds text.
^+1.
ABC's Matt Gutman says he's not sure "if we have seen an alleged murder with such specific text messages" that were "very touching, in a way, that I think many of us didn't expect..."
Pause.
Very touching? Penis touching.
Exactly what does a boy to girl have, down there?
Disappointment.
What ever it is, the shitbag chose spending endless time on Reddit and Bluesky over it. Probably says something.
My understanding is that they push the penis into the body as a makeshift vagina/penis sleeve.
That could be frot with challenges.
Any way you slice it, it's a split decision...
Might rub some the wrong way.
Seems like someone is getting shafted.
One of them getting the short end of the stick.
Clearly a nub-ulous situation.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/i97Ry3bH_yA
Obligatory South Park clip.
Keeper
"alleged murder"?
How in hell can you even pretend the murder did not take place?
Oh wait. ABC.
They haven't read the coroner's report yet; could have been spontaneous rupture of a carotid artery at the moment a bullet passed by...
Died with covid
Boys will be Girls
Utah County Attorney says mother of suspected Charlie Kirk shooter stated that her son “had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro-gay and trans rights-oriented,” and dated his trans roommate, a biological male.
- The Global Eye
Blue Sky content consumer and Soros apologist tells us the suspect could be a conservative groyper. We the people just don’t know anything and should treat the volume of known information as untrue just like team blue treated the fake Russia hoax information as fact.
I wonder did it ever occur to her (or anybody else) that you can be gay / trans / whatever while also being right wing / conservative ? Or did she see gay and immediately decide in her head that "gay means left ! "
Is it so hard to wrap your brain around the possibility of a gay / trans conservative ? Or a conservative that believes in the rights and dignity of a person regardless of what's in their pants like some kind of filthy Libertarian ?
Please tell me how you manage to make it through your day while being this retarded.
What ITL said.
I wonder did it ever occur to her (or anybody else) that you can be gay / trans / whatever while also being right wing / conservative ? Or did she see gay and immediately decide in her head that "gay means left ! "
There are lots of gay conservatives, but if you're gay and conservative, then while you might sleep with men, you're not gay.
Oh, based on the article I linked right above, there's a "Down's Syndrome" joke somewhere in the followup.
So, LB, how does your convoluted assertion shake it in the current circumstance?
Yeah, I thought so. But, theoretically, it could be...just don't know or haven't met any.
What ITL said.
Seriously. Why would a gay conservative shoot Charlie Kirk? That doesn't even make sense. Just ask Dave Rubin and Scott Presler who were Kirk's friends.
To suggest people on the internet are cheering for the murder of Charlie Kirk is "the total opposite of what's actually happening."
I didn't realize how much I missed the gaslighting of the COVID era until now.
Full on Pravda is back, baby!
What time is the two-minutes hate?
There are 4 lights
24/7 these days - - - - - - - -
Sixty-one minutes past the hour.
When the big hand is on the little hand.
Seems to happen a lot on the left.
Freedom Down Under
And so it begins ...
Australia to implement a FULL-BLOWN government digital ID!
Covid was a test.
This will be the real show.
Then everyone will have a social credit score and the country will turn into a live data farm.
https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1774487881706275002
Crikey!
Quarantine ID!!! - sarc. Probably.
Have only begun internationally traveling again after nations are sunsetting the covid passport crap. Oz isn’t on the list of destinations and stuff like this helps keep it that way. Though suppose I could apply for asylum and expect Canberra to pay all my expenses in perpetuity.
Good. The populace has been allowing this shit unchallenged for years. They deserve to live in a police state. Once an inmate...
They haven’t gone far from the prisoner/jailer mentality in 200+ years.
The politicians in Australia are obviously the descendants of the prison guards from a couple of centuries ago. Not much has changed.
Reason: It's web3.0 realized, man! Down with the nation state, up with the corporate data farm. The size of your SQL database will be your borders!
Does this mean everyone is required to have a cell phone?
Is this how 22-year-olds really text?
Get a load of the boomer up there who doesn't know how the kids rap to each other these days.
22 is the new 12.
Do Shrike and Jeffy know?
The lived experience!
Youre so rizz bruh
6 7
No cap.
fr. ngl... ong.
Are you niggling?
Or sniggering?
At campus after campus, skirmishes keep erupting over how to honor Kirk—and whether students who oppose Kirk will allow tributes to him to remain up and untouched.
...while wearing Che t-shirts.
...while wearing George Floyd t-shirts.
These are people with the same type of thinking that skid marks on a rainbow crosswalk are a hate crime. They have incredible levels of double standards and entitlement.
As do most shitty, spoiled 12 year olds. Also all Marxists.
Behold the tolerant left.
At the risk of sounding like Nardz, we’ve been far too tolerant of the “tolerant” left for far too long. Time for them to meet some consequences for their behavior.
"Nardz was Right!" t-shirts on sale at the tracerv gift shop after the tour is completed.
Agree.
I still think it's a bad idea to be violent back yet as we have the very high ground here and losing it would be a mistake, but the time for shrugging and ignoring when they do their shouting down and smear campaigns stuff is now past.
I think suing them to oblivion every time they make a smear or do something violent is job one, right now. And because most of their victims can't afford legal justice I think some sort of charitable group created to provide legal aide just for those cases is monumentally important.
It's first targets should be the ADL and the SPLC who have been nothing more than DNC super-PACs exclusively running smear campaigns against innocents for the last quarter century. They need to be shut down.
I would venture to guess that the non-lunatic adult population, as in those of us who don't want to engage in or condone violent actions is 10 or more to 1. That leaves millions of crazies, but we outnumber them by so much that they will be crushed legally.
I think suing them to oblivion every time they make a smear or do something violent is job one,
I agree except when violence is involved. Violence must be met with immediate violence. Lawsuits take years and may not by won. If a demon walks up to a conservative information table and trashes the table, or assaults the guy in the chair, or even throws (any) liquid, the perp should be met with force. Zero fucking tolerance. The pendulum has swung.
I mean, if not now, what's it going to take?
Also uses a vape/weed pen near end of video…
The clearest evidence of douchery.
Somewhere a single tear is trickling down Nick Gillespie's cheek. Hope it doesn't stain the leather jacket.
It's a Dirk Diggler real imitation Italian leather jacket. He'll be fine.
That leather jacket is going to kick Gillespie's ass one day.
"Strip Club Executives Bribed Tax Auditor With Lap Dances."
I'd like to think the execs themselves gave the lap dances.
Will have to read the Yelp review.
Give the tax auditor something else to fuck other than you.
'Some, like ABC's Matt Gutman, appear rather enchanted with Robinson and these text messages'
What would the average akita think of Gutman? Or Robinson?
Appears to play well with the boomer crowd still watching ABC.
Both of them?
Ahem. Both of they/them.
Hey, if you can tell me where else I can find misreported week-old news, plus east coast weather AND a cooking segment, I want to hear it.
There would be shame and growling. Looks like Gutman has turned the other cheek on the assassination and pivoted to coddling the suspect. If the trans boyfriend cosplay woman thing doesn’t dump the suspect, would Gutman support conjugal visits while in furry costume?
New York State terrorism charges against Luigi Mangione...
He's a whatwas.
What if Mangione and Robinson had a love child?
Since they’re both guys, I’m guessing it would be a piece of shit.
Stop summoning sqrsly.
Sqrlsy is a cannibal.
But might vandalism and disrupting a memorial and spitting on fellow students be considered something beyond expression? I'm torn here...
I'm not. When you use your freedom of expression to supress others' freedom of expression you crossed the line. By Felicia.
Also, spittting on people is assult. Practically murder in the covid ear according to the maskholes.
What's HIV nowadays, chopped liver?
If you spit on someone when your mouth is bleeding because they punched you in the face - isn't that self defense?
I'll need to know skin colors before passing judgment on that hypothetical.
If you have aids and go to a gay orgy is that like driving around with a bear in your trunk?
Does the bear have COVID?
Monkeypox.
Wouldn't Fatty McGee consider that a lover and not a threat?
Yes, that's beyond the limits of freedom of expression.
Also, they painted over the vandalism of the memorial with further vandalism: BLM imagery.
https://x.com/TaraBull808/status/1968202143879536722
Just like the flag burning EO that they were up in arms about. It turns out that if you can't have an open fire, it is actually illegal to burn a flag there. If you steal the flag to burn, also illegal. If you burn your own in a space that allows burning, protected speech. Nuance and legal definitions are only supposed to apply to one side.
Respect for the speech of others is how free speech is upheld in society. Competing speech is fine. Erasing someone else's speech shows the person doesn't share that value and possibly forfeits his own. I can't recall stories of blm murals getting destroyed, but I don't support that either
I recall one, but it was arguably an act of God.
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/news/george-floyd-mural-struck-by-lightning-in-toledo-ohio/
Yeah, weird take by Liz in an otherwise well stated segment.
'Consider this interaction, from the University of North Carolina Wilmington'
Why aren't the chicks in that photo wearing their mandatory hand maids' outfits and making sandwiches?
You left out barefooted and pregnant. And everyone knows The Handmaid's Tale was the inspiration for Project 25.
I only ever see women cosplay in hand maids' outfits. They say it is in protest, but I think they are unintentionally telegraphing a sexual preference.
It's been obvious from the beginning that the handmaid thing is a just kink for them.
"...Project 25..."
Funny how that was such a THREAT!!!!!!!!! and then disappeared in the wink of an eye.
Election scare tactic, but noticed it's been recycled a couple of days ago; expect it will continue to be drug out as propaganda bait as needed:
https://www.msnbc.com/ali-velshi/watch/we-warned-you-about-project-2025-well-it-s-here-247555141874
As someone who frequently vacations at the nearby beaches, UNCW chicks are wearing much less than handmaid’s tale costumes. And doing it well.
It's disturbing to me that some large portion of the country is totally unaware of what the other half believes
I hate to break it to you, Lizzie, but this isn't exactly new. Polling has consistently shown for years that neither Team's partisans understand what the other side thinks or believes.
But also that Team Left has significantly less understanding of their opponents than Team Right.
Slightly? I'd say completely.
And because team blue holds the megaphone, Shrike's "both sides" assertion that the rest of the country has no idea what they're saying, is laughable.
This is laughably and retardedly false as Haidt as shown many many times. Conservatives understand your retarded ideas. They can state what you believe. The opposite is not true dumbfuck.
People on the right accurately predicting the bad behavior by the left are the real monsters.
Ask someone on the left to pretend to be conservative and you get a ridiculous caricature. Ask someone on the right to pretend to be liberal/very liberal and they can often nail it.
We can smell you shits a mile off and know exactly what you are, lying pile of slimy lefty shit.
We understand what you believe just fine.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), under Robert F. Kennedy Jr...
No qualifier needed, unless you're trying to bolster the agency's credibility (however marginally).
That particular structure doesn't need bolstering, it's beyond repair and requires demolition.
There's the expectation that parents be comfortable with assuming some additional risk for the greater good...
COVID exposed that public health agencies are primarily concerned with the system's health, not your health.
Treat the symptoms, never the cause. There is no money to be made in a cure.
'I'm a little torn on the nastiness that's emerging in the wake of the Kirk assassination and how it ought to be dealt with. We should give wide berth to expressive acts and have campuses that tolerate speech, even ugly speech that offends many of us. But might vandalism and disrupting a memorial and spitting on fellow students be considered something beyond expression? I'm torn here, and truthfully pretty disgusted by the reactions to Kirk's killing from cable news pundits, college students, online TikTokers—not people I found especially reliable and even-keeled before all this, but…new lows are always possible, I suppose.'
Time to lock the campus gates, and hand out shotguns and swords. Let the young barbarians sort things out.
Shotguns to the side that supports the second amendment, and swords to the gun-control crowd?
You're close, but the anti-gun set should be armed only with words. As they have screeched at us for years, words are violence.
Literally shaking here...
Jeff was still pushing Robinson was a groyper/maga last night despite released text messages, interviews with friends and family, etc.
They are all broken.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/09/wink-wink-kirk-murderers-bragging-texts-abc-gushed/
Professors glad Kirk is dead for merely posting their comments into a database.
https://pjmedia.com/rick-moran/2025/09/16/professors-targeted-by-charlie-kirks-watch-list-relieved-hes-dead-n4943755
Many of us talked about the corruption and indoctrination of universities decades ago. Are they responsible? We were told to ignore it, no big deal at the time.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/was-current-madness-birthed-university
Jeff also trued to equate an 82-year old man ostensibly dying of an end-of-life disease with a 31-year old being struck down by an assassin’s bullet. If there are any fence sitters here, he’s not convincing any of them to join team blue.
Bidens in trunks is pedojeffy's schrodinger's cat.
Schrödinger’s bear.
Schrödinger's gummi bear
Broken? More like lying, sadistic fucks.
Jeff was still pushing Robinson was a groyper/maga last night
Jesse, I know you're stupid and lie all the time but you have to give me credit for calling the shooter a leftist immediately.
My rationale? He stated that he was an avowed anti-fascist.
Therefore he is of the left.
Nothing says "anti-facist" like killing a man advocating free speech.
That isn't why he killed him.
He shot him because he was beaning mean to trannies.
By being mean, you mean not accepting their dilusions?
Let them have their delusions.
I don't care.
why are you on a libertarian board?
A better question is why is a pederast like you on a libertarian board?
He’s here for supply.
You know who else was a pederast?
Turns out: the crazy old guy who tried to distract law enforcement while the shooter escaped:
https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1968014334023422179
Why are YOU on a libertarian board, Shrike?
You just claimed it's okay to violate the NAP on Kirk (who was the embodiment of the NAP), because he thought the transgenderism faith was largely autogynephilics forcing everyone else to play along with their fetish, and the mentally ill.
Liar. I claimed no such thing.
You lie like the other Trump Cultists here.
Literally seven posts up, you retard:
"shrike 3 hours ago
That isn't why he killed him.
He shot him because he was beaning mean to trannies."
Libertarianism doesn’t have anything to do with accepting people’s delusions, pedo.
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#aversion-therapy
Poor shrike.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Speaking of lying, sadistic fucks…
You were banned for posting a link to child porn.
This chart shows why the left participates in gaslighting. Look at who the left thinks Robinson was for.
https://x.com/cabot_phillips/status/1967751889199747502
Democrats participate in gaslighting as they themselves are gaslit by their media day-in and day-out. They get programming all day long and never look at any other points of view. And that programming is a bitch to break.
But Blue Sky showed the suspect wearing a Trump shirt so it must be true.
Really baffling that people reach these conclusions. But the question is about party affiliation not political philosophy. I don't know if this guy is a Democrat. But he is obviously in agreement with the leftist wing of the party. Which is essentially the entire party with a handful of notable exceptions.
Demon Jeffy lies. It’s what he does.
Him using the "punching down" phrase was the most telling part of his crashout last night. He REALLY doesn't like it when his lefty boos are resisted and readily adopts their buzzwords and catchphrases in unguarded moments.
He also didnt like when I reminded him he was pro censorship so his free speech claims are nonsense.
chemjeff radical individualist 2 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
If the Right stopped spreading dangerous conspiracy theories, they would have no need to censor anyone.
Is it just that any devout Christian is considered a terrible sexist pig?
No one venerates motherhood like the Catholics, which of course is unadulterated misogyny.
Never mind anti Nihilist [is it logically possible to be against nothing?].
Check your precepts. Is it logically possible for someone to be in favor or or motivated by nothing?
“Nihilists! Fuck me. I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos.“
LOL, you beat me by a minute. I should learn to type faster. But then I should do a lot of things I'm not going to do.
nice marmot.
Who gives a shit about the fucking marmot!
Fucking dipshit with a nine-toed woman.
Well, they finally did it. They killed my fucking car.
Anti Nihlists? Fuck me! I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, dude, at least it's an ethos.
Ok, that's a cult film I haven't watched; I will remediate that failing shortly.
It’s worth it, even just for the quotability.
'A little offended that the most Reason possible headline appeared in The New York Times: "Strip Club Executives Bribed Tax Auditor With Lap Dances."'
You know who else was compromised with lap dances?
Slick's Willie?
Tranny groomer sex offender book reader story tellers?
Eric Swalwell by Fang Fang?
Dearborn Michigan is our own Lil slice of caliphate.
Open Source Intel
@Osint613
MUST WATCH
A Dearborn, Michigan resident opposed naming a street after pro-Hezbollah figure Osama Siblani
Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud responded to the resident: “You do not belong in this city, Islamophobe! Get out!, you are not welcomed here”
Video
https://x.com/Osint613/status/1968057543290392952
Future American Gaza?
That was my alternate to caliphate.
I thought Detroit was the open-air prison?
Pretty much. This type of NPC shaming language is pretty common amongst westernized Palestinians, who tend to actually be secularists whose real religion is cultural marxism.
'New York law requires that prosecutors who charge a defendant with terrorism show that the person attempted to intimidate a civilian population, or influence government policy or conduct.'
Like with mean tweets or erroneous book-keeping?
Security guided tour of the Capitol.
"...and insurance company executives surely do not count as people, am I right? - some NYS judge, apparently.
I actually almost went to Texas State (when it was known as Southwest Texas), and ultimately I didn't because it has a local reputation as a party school.
I guess when you choose a school because it has a tubing river that goes through campus you might end up with more than the average share of idiot students.
It is absurd that the left is cheering the undercharging of a guy that murdered someone because of their job. I really fail to see how that guy wasn't making a political statement with his shooting, but I suspect the Fed is going to be less up their ass on his prosecution.
Also, those 'loving' texts were literally about a premeditated murder of a person that never did anything wrong to this guy or his boyfriend. It shouldn't take a genius to condemn that, yet here we are.
But why do the idiots have to get political? Can't they just party and fuck each other?
Not after they all mutilated their genitals. Now they have to take out their frustrations on normies.
I don't know, I kind of get the impression most trannies keep their junk and then do onlyfans.
I'm
nota biologist, but genitals have got nothing to do with it.I'm not really sure, but the explanation that seems to fit best are extremist professors.
Colleges that largely exist to get people jobs seem to fare far better than colleges that seem to exist for perpetuating ideological nonsense. I suppose that makes sense too, as most humanities professors never expected to accomplish much more than to teach the subject to the next generation of humanities students and perhaps write a few books to get big bucks.
There isn't much demand for those subjects outside of their own bubbles. I don't mean to make light of all the humanities, some of it can be valuable, but it seems to me the valuable part is teaching critical thinking and that is the specific part they don't seem to know how to teach because they have none themselves.
Universities have largely become a job center for unemployed humanities majors. Those colleges keep growing and siphoning funds from the real schools like engineering. They increase administration to fund their own humanities majors.
Well, they they had to do something during the refractory period. Why not politically radicalize while everyone is charging up?
The good ole days of boomer-dom.
Now you'd have to concern yourself with retroactive withdrawal of consent, at least until after you graduated.
Guessing the Mangiones have hired a well paid legal team to get the charges reduced.
'But this is indicative of so much that's frustrating about public health: There's the expectation that parents be comfortable with assuming some additional risk for the greater good, to ensure no child anywhere slips through the cracks.'
Hey, do you want health equity or stupid freedom?
"Look, you are a bad person if you do not assume the level of risk for your child the state bureaucracy deems acceptable, understood?"
Bey Liz, wait until you hear what Destiny, followed by millions of retarded leftists, had to say.
Greg Price
@greg_price11
Destiny just said the quiet part out loud:
"If you wanted Charlie Kirk to be alive, Donald Trump shouldn't have been President for the second term."
Mask fully off.
Video
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1967713814918598709
He later said conservatives needed to fear being shot for speaking in public.
Remember --- his son hates his guts and his ex-wife cucked the ever living hell out of him.
ALWAYS remember that about "him"
Did we ever get an actual answer to whether he sucked Nick Fuentes's dick?
No, but the rumors him taking some cock in him are legion.
Is (D)icked magazine’s Matt Welch actually Destiny?
Destiny also said that conservatives need to be afraid of violence against them in public places.
I'm informed by reliable source that this sort of thing just isn't happening. Nope, not at all.
Destiny is a fucking creep, man. He rants and raves on his show pushing for people to actually commit acts of violence. He’s also been a cuck for his wife (ex-wife now?), and has been known to spout off on how he likes 12 year old girls.
The guy is a manlet pederast with a clear humiliation fetish. He was actually livestreaming when Kirk was murdered, and he immediately got up and locked his door. He and Hasan Piker have been getting more vocal about getting violent against conservatives in the last few weeks, and it notably coincided with them gaining a more visible mainstream media profile in the left's desperate attempt to find "their own Joe Rogan."
It's attention-seeking behavior that's 100% pure projection.
"The judge overseeing the case, Gregory Carro, said he had found the evidence behind the charges 'legally insufficient.'
Apparently political messages on the casings used dont qualify as a political message to the judge. That was his reasoning.
Today, the Federal Reserve is expected to cut interest rates, given the weakening labor market.
Weakening? They just revised 910k down from last year. Biden lied. The market was weak the last 2 years. Largely dependent on government employment.
' It's disturbing to me that some large portion of the country is totally unaware of what the other half believes'
Are we saying that if the left believes all people on the right are racist, misogynist Nazis then the right can't believe that all people on the left are dogmatic nanny-state socialists?
The "Charlie Kirk is a misogynist" line strikes me as so weird and untrue. Is it just that any devout Christian is considered a terrible sexist pig? It's disturbing to me that some large portion of the country is totally unaware of what the other half believes, and so quick to look past their honorable and consistent actions:
This has been true for over a decade and even documented and studied by Haidt.
Liz seems to be on a journey of discovering all the horrible things that progressive have been saying for decades, they actually meant.
like omygawd people are so mean.
^^^ nice
You can see that with Shrike. He was raised in a culture steeped in Christianity for more than 1,600 years, yet his entire understanding of its doctrines and beliefs boils down to a handful of YouTube atheist memes.
The Shrikes also never pause to consider why the movements for women’s rights and the abolition of slavery were born out of Christian Europe rather than China or the Ottoman Empire. They vaguely gesture toward the European Enlightenment, failing to realize that:
1. It was the Scottish Enlightenment thinkers, not the broader European ones, who were the strongest abolitionists, and the Scottish Enlightenment was far less secular than they imagine.
2. Both the European and Scottish Enlightenments arose within a Christian cultural framework.
3. The pioneers of the abolitionist movement were overwhelmingly British evangelicals such as William Wilberforce and John Newton.
Meanwhile, in the early 20th century it was secular “scientific” racists who opposed the suffragettes, who declared blacks to be subhuman (see Ota Benga and the execrable New York Times), and who mocked clergymen who dissented as unscientific fools. And yet now, with historical amnesia, they claim that it was secularism that pushed progress all along.
Perhaps this explains why history has been so carefully neglected in schools for the past 60 years.
+1, well put.
Speaking of Ottomans, it’s being reported that the Turks are smuggling weapons into Sudan to keep that conflict going.
Starting to realize Turkey’s had a bigger hand in flooding Europe with rapefugees than I previously thought.
Erdogan is a fanatic who secretly thinks he is going to be the next Caliph.
The Righteous Mind?
And his morality project.
Haidt did go a bit insane with TDS first trump term though. He even admitted to it.
"According to the Robinson parents' account to investigators, their son had grown more political over the past year and "more pro-gay and trans-rights oriented"
Chemjeffism kills. Don't let your child become a chemjeff.
The first rule of rainbow cult club is that you do not talk about rainbow cult club.
Unh uh. The first rule of rainbow cult club is to talk nonstop about rainbow cult club.
The second rule of rainbow cult club is to get offended and claim oppression whenever anybody thinks you talk too much or should celebrate being a member of the rainbow cult club even slightly less.
If you aren't literally walking on unblemished rainbows that celebrate you as a person wherever you go with nary an even obliquely dubious word about any facet of your personality anywhere, you're oppressed to the point that someone has to die.
Especially to children.
But might vandalism and disrupting a memorial and spitting on fellow students be considered something beyond expression?
Yes, it is. Physically interfering with other people or property that isn't yours is not protected as free speech or expression.
All the author should need to do is ask themselves if a white person did that at a BLM protest, would that be ok.
Although one might be forgiving to someone for thinking vandalism and physical disruption of an event is acceptable if they just watched BLM get away with much worse for years. It's not hard to understand how they might think those are the rules of society, since they are now.
I think a lot of us warned of this very thing, in fact. Giving a pass to some groups for their violence makes everyone think it's the new rules for everyone. That is how societal rules are held in place, in fact, outside open coercion.
'All the author should need to do is ask themselves if a white person did that at a BLM protest, would that be ok.'
I think you need to repeat your DEI training, especially the modules that justify asymmetric morality and selective race-based rights.
They don't want me in DEI training, at the very least I'd be fired after such a training for 'asking questions'. Fortunately I haven't worked in a corporate setting for about a decade now, and even when I did my job was numbers and data driven so we didn't have to go to those types of meetings.
It's funny that when your department is central the companies functioning, a lot of the bullshit meetings don't end up on your calendar.
It seems that they feel that there are colonized groups and colonizer groups. They believe that whites are the colonizer group.
to them, people in colonized groups get to hurt whites, even commit sex crimes against them. It does not matter whether the individual was personally colonized or oppressed.
This is why they hate ICE. This is why they blame Laken Riley for her murder.
Agreed. Jan 6 was probably when people should have figured this out. The left showed in 2020 that having a public temper tantrum was, in their minds, an appropriate response to things they think are bad. What did they expect from the right? Of course they (i.e. the more extreme left) don't care about that kind of consistency. They do what they think will help move the needle in their preferred direction, not what they think will establish reasonable rules of social conduct.
+1 Well said.
In other words, it is (D) ifferent when we riot.
This was why Jack Marshall wrote this.
https://ethicsalarms.com/2021/01/06/ethics-observations-on-the-pro-trump-rioting-at-the-capitol/
First and foremost, anyone who did not condemn all of the George Floyd/Jacob Blake/Breonna Taylor/ Black Lives Matters rioting that took place this summer and fall is ethically estopped from criticizing this episode.
That means I can, and will, condemn it as stupid, useless, self-destructive and anti-democratic violence, but most Democrats, progressives and media pundits cannot.
"It's not hard to understand how they might think those are the rules of society, since they are now."
This is why I roll my eyes at the "dangerous rhetoric!" pearl clutching. We've seen that we've already gone far past just mean words being the problem.
I'm a little torn on the nastiness that's emerging in the wake of the Kirk assassination and how it ought to be dealt with.
...
"New York State terrorism charges against Luigi Mangione, the defendant in the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare's chief executive last year, were dismissed on Tuesday, including a first-degree murder count that could have landed him in prison for the rest of his life," reports The New York Times. "The judge overseeing the case, Gregory Carro, said he had found the evidence behind the charges 'legally insufficient.'
Remember a few months ago how Conservatives and Libertarians should really sit the bench in the culture wars? It should be increasingly clear that that's a "First They Came" position.
People need to realize that Bragg is intentionally "blowing" the case.
He's setting up the perfect dichotomy of Trump is taking down your hero who's actually innocent and did you a favor. It will only embolden the crazies and make even more normal people defect away from them.
I think I'm still against tacking on terrorism charges for events where killing people happened. Just murdering those people should carry stiff penalties, they shouldn't have to resport to nebulous 'terrorism' charges to put this guy behind bars for all of his life.
Also still against the death penalty since Blackstone's Ratio always applies.
I don't think you know how ratios work. If it always applies, you let 9 people off the hook for the death penalty and kill the 10th and most guilty. The ratio is 1-in-10, not 0.
Blackstone is pretty clear about clearly delineated legal execution being preferable to the oppressive whimsy of judicial discretion:
https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/amendVIIIs4.html
though in very atrocious crimes other circumstances of terror, pain, or disgrace are superadded
Blackstone is pretty straightforwardly making the statement that the law could or should use terror to punish the guilty equally rather than allow a magistrate or the judiciary to treat their favored criminals preferentially.
Your invocation of him against the death penalty isn't even a non-sequitur. In a world where no one ever dies, your conception of Blackstone's Ratio as being a prescription for the number of people the state could/should/would execute for whatever reason.
The ratio was not a literal one, although that's a novel take on it I guess.
Since the death penalty can not be rescinded, it's judged as foolish as it presumes the perfection of one's judiciary.
At the core of his statements lies a preference for the defense of the innocent over the punishment of the guilty.
The ratio was not a literal one, although that's a novel take on it I guess.
It's *the* novel take on both ratios and Blackstone's Ratio.
Since the death penalty can not be rescinded, it's judged as foolish as it presumes the perfection of one's judiciary.
Is this you quoting Blackstone or you creating a novel interpretation of what you wish he'd said? Because the invokation is "wet roads cause rain" backwards. Blackstone considered the Judiciary under but independent of Charles II to be in accordance with natural law and/or perfection. You seem to have the impression of Blackstone as some sort of modern pacifist laissez-faire legal hippie, which he most certainly was not.
Blackstone aside, no punishment can be rescinded and thereby the foolish presumption of judiciary perfection is pretty obviously your own.
At the core of his statements lies a preference for the defense of the innocent over the punishment of the guilty.
A preference, not an abstinence or foregoing, and in the context of magistrates beholden their King. He was preferential to the innocent against kings and magistrates beholden to the crown. He specifically wasn't in any preferential to protecting the guilty or ameliorating their punishment.
Yours is a dishonest acontextual interpretation. Blackstone clearly believed in the death penalty, torture, and terror/making examples. He opposed the out-of-hand or whimsical and disordered use of it that you're trying to inject or supplant.
You might as well say "Jesus said render unto Caesar, so clearly God has granted the government or Congress the power to levy taxes."
This is the same stupid low-brow idiocy that can't conceptually distinguish a conviction from a sentencing or the system working as a whole.
What's up, Peanuts?
Bloomberg reports that Treasury Sec and Soros acolyte Scott Bessent illegally listed two residences as "primary".
I sure you dumb crackers will be demanding he be fired?
Yeah sure.
You constantly claim Trump has surronded himself with boot lickers who do whatever he demands. If that is true, what difference does it make who is carrying out Trump's orders?
I post that because Donnie wanted to fire Fed Board member Lisa Cook for exactly the same thing.
Of course he would never say anything about Soros-boy Scottie.
Except that not why Trump wants to fire Lisa Cook. Shall we begin with the mortgage fraud, or the fact that she’s as incompetent as you?
She had zero papers on macroeconomics before being elected.
She's a buffoon. Her tenure committee didnt want to grant tenure but was overruled for political reasons.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS- addled lying pile of lefty shit.
You were banned for posting a link to child porn.
Don't worry Liz the same totalitarian fags saying Kirk was a misogynist are the same retards that think the Muslim animals love the gays and the chicks
Is it just that any devout Christian is considered a terrible sexist pig?
I'm not offended as a Christian man, I'm offended as a guy you were warned and/or told your boyfriend not to worry about!
Oh god. Classic.
Show was money.
I’m not an anti-dentite!
Is it just that any devout Christian is considered a terrible sexist pig?
It's that anyone not sufficiently leftist is a terrible sexist pig.
I have some sad news to report, Peanuts.
The legendary Cheetah III strip club is closing. AKA the Spring Street ballet.
Developers bought the prime location to build a high-rise.
Fucking criminal.
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#aversion-therapy
Kurt Cobain treatment would be more effective.
Nah. I’m thinking wood chippers.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Ok, why do you care? They’re female and over the age of 12. That’s not exactly your type.
You were banned for posting a link to child porn.
The "Charlie Kirk is a misogynist" line strikes me as so weird and untrue.
The people that believe that hang out in tribal cults and never talk to anyone that has a difference of opinion. They think they need therapy after having to talk to dad at thanksgiving. "Person I don't like is racist, misogynist, homophobe, etc." is never questioned. Truth doesn't matter to them. It gives them pats on the back from fellow tribe members.
There needs to be a more precise word for fundie-nut types who oppose the modern women's movement.
I guess "fundie-nut" won't be adopted.
"Conservative" is too broad in meaning.
What about the non-religious and generally open minded people who oppose the modern women's movement? There are a lot of us out there. One can think that women should be free and even encouraged to pursue whatever careers and lifestyles (and even abortions) they like while still understanding that there are real differences between the sexes that actually matter and actually are relevant to social interactions and moral standards.
Hmmm. that is a good question.
I presume you oppose part of the modern women's movement then.
I can't imagine what it would be.
Title IX? Only applies when federal funding is involved.
The pill?
Are there "real differences"? Sure.
Why would a secular person oppose the mwm?
Why would a secular man be against the "all men are rapist, sexist pigs, and all women need to be believed always. Men are suppressors, women are suppressed. Kill all men" I wonder why.
Mostly because it is making women miserable and fucking up relations between the sexes. The denial of real physical and psychological differences between the sexes and lack of regard for the importance of reproduction and motherhood (and on the other side, the importance and utility of traditional masculinity) are probably what I have the biggest problem with.
I agree with that observation.
But that is just the way shit goes. In a free society that safeguards individual rights it will happen.
I guess the Muslim way of burqas and oppression would insure women stay in their lane.
(for the record I despise all religion - especially Islam)
One of the more obvious points that gets overlooked is that if there is, in fact, something one can call 'toxic masculinity' than so too must there be a 'toxic femininity'.
I'm sure all of us can think of examples of both, curious they are unable to do so.
I'd say both definitely exist and should be examined. The problem is that "toxic masculinity" becomes "masculinity is toxic". Men do tend more towards violence and stupidity in the tail of the curve, but too much, or the wrong kind of femininity causes all kinds of social problems too. It's almost like there is a good reason for differences between the sexes.
"masculinity is toxic"
And see, that right there is overtly sexist. You're not wrong that this is often how it gets stated though, which tells us rather a lot about the people saying it.
so too must there be a 'toxic femininity'.
^ Here's a guy that left a cupboard door open.
Or has worked in a workplace where there are a lot of women. I've mostly worked in male dominated areas, but it seems like once there is a certain critical mass of women, the level of drama skyrockets. Of course it's not all women (and not all men are immune), but that does seem to be a general trend.
You're not kidding. The nice thing about being autistic-like is being completely oblivious to this stuff. I have a female coworker that first pointed this same thing out to me about female managers though.
I wonder what DLAM would say?
>>certain critical mass of women
if they're not naked, two.
I thought you'd go with anything above ~125 lbs being critical mass of women...although with proper proportions...
lol well-played use of mass
I worked with nurses, who are overwhelmingly female, for almost 20 years in various capacities. Many are professional, some are not.
Male nurses, as a general rule, don't give a fuck and just do their jobs. Doubly so with travel nurses of both genders.
^ Here's a guy that left a cupboard door open.
I get that it's a joke, but I was more specifically thinking of all the Karen's in the world. Perhaps it's no coincidence the name we use for those types of people is a woman's name.
Yeah, Karens and I'd argue wokeness would qualify.
I am of that camp.
Brad Rafenesperger, the Georgia Sec of State who defied Dictator-wannabe Donnie's demand to commit vote fraud in 2020, is running for Governor.
I will support him just because he is honest.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of slimy lefty shit.
Fuck you, Sevo, you Tenderloin splooge-mopping fairy.
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#aversion-therapy
That’s still better than being a pederast like you, Shrike.
You and Chumface are pathetic with your campaign to silence me with lies.
It is not working.
And what exactly happened to your original SPB account?
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#aversion-therapy
It’s not a lie that you were banned for posting a link to child porn.
We know you're a strong supporter of "Senater Tim Scott"
Since when did Trump want vote fraud?
You were banned for posting a link to child porn.
Just so you guys know, I'm fully religious too.
Akin to the above, I'm not offended as a Christian, I'm offended as a rational human being that you don't realize that this is like saying, "Just so you guys know, I have black friends too." while using your own feces to scribble a lynching on the nearest memorial.
Love thy neighbor... I'm not going to love a guy...
Right, we knew where this was heading from the "Just so you guys know..." lie. You don't believe any of it. You're just too cowardly, weak, and stupid to stand in honest and earnest support of your (lack of) convictions.
Aw, look the the morons are painting rocks.
Anyway...
Why didn’t Robinson just rob a bank and take hostages, then demand payment for his partner’s transitioning?
Attica! Attica! But seriously. The dog days are past for the summer.
I'm dying ova hear!!
I feel like making this comment is kind of "Yeah, that's some b.s." that doesn't really add anything to the discussion, but how in holy hell does a judge dismiss 1st degree murder for Mangione? Are they really suggesting this wasn't planned with malice of forethought?
2d degree conviction can still get life?
This is due to weirdness in NY state law. 1st degree murder doesn't refer to premeditated, but killing a cop, terrorism or other specific situations.
Credit for pointing this out is due to some other poster here when we discussed this before, but I can't remember who it was.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_New_York_law
I gather that 2nd degree in NY is equivalent to 1st degree in many other states and 1st degree requires some pretty specific aggravating factors. SO it's not as if he's facing a minor charge or isn't accused of premeditation. At least that's what I've gathered on the subject.
Looks like the maximum penalty for 2nd degree murder allows for parole which is far too lenient in my opinion. This guy could be walking the street in ten years.
Forget it, Jake, it's New York.
I agree it's still too lenient. But that seems more a problem with NY law. Just pointing out that 2nd degree doesn't mean what it does in most states.
Thank you (and to quicktown brix) for the explanation.
Yeah, New York has some really weird quirks to their laws not found elsewhere in the US. I’ve picked up on them over the years watching Law & Order.
>>... from the University of North Carolina Wilmington:
Ms. Zambrano's friends should help her with that Keystone Light belly
She needs a good hard something in her mouth
one thing's for certain Matt Gutman notices bulges
>>I'm a little torn on the nastiness that's emerging in the wake of the Kirk assassination and how it ought to be dealt with.
I'm enjoying the tears of the recently unemployed and recently expelled ... the mugshot of the Texas Tech chick was delicious
>>It's disturbing to me that some large portion of the country is totally unaware of what the other half believes, and so quick to look past their honorable and consistent actions
you ... write for a political webzine
+1 You... have a clip of someone defacing a monument that starts out "Just so you guys know, I'm fully religious too." like someone telling a bunch of tailgaters, while pissing on their grill, that they know how to grand slam a football.
fully religious like only does anal to remain virginal?
"The endzone is where you do a touchdown." -Kat Timpf
It's disturbing to me that some large portion of the country is totally unaware of what the other half believes
I'm not sure it's half. But it is media and journalists in general, and it's been that way for a long... long time. Hell, I remember the 2016 election the Seattle media literally followed around the one Trump voter in Seattle with a microphone for several weeks after the election, to try to understand this strange and alien creature. Then I read another local columnist who was so perplexed by the outcome felt he needed to drive to one of those icky places where truckers (whatever they are) sit and drink folgers from chipped porcelain and find out what makes them tick.
No, seriously.
But it is media and journalists in general, and it's been that way for a long... long time.
I just read some lefty retard going off on a sports board I frequent about how his side needs to make sports and politics a combined construct (LOL, as if his side hasn't been doing that for a while now), and that there needs to be something done to break up talk radio because it's supposedly radicalizing right wingers (as in, "we need to monopolize media to Save Democracy").
They're still stuck in this 2005 paradigm where you can spazz out about Dubya and post a bunch of clips from The Daily Show of Jon Stewart doing his stupid faggot mugging for the camera, and people will go along with it because it's so cool, maan! They really are clueless as to how much they've alienated and continue to alienate normies, particularly Zoomer and Gen Alpha males, which is why they keep pounding on these blatantly gaslighting headlines, despite the fact that pretty much anyone on Twitter or Facebook can now push back against their narratives without getting shadow-banned anymore.
I just read some lefty retard going off on a sports board I frequent about how his side needs to make sports and politics a combined construct (LOL, as if his side hasn't been doing that for a while now), and that there needs to be something done to break up talk radio because it's supposedly radicalizing right wingers (as in, "we need to monopolize media to Save Democracy").
Yeah, that would he shrike, who still thinks 'talk radio' is the font of right-wing thought in the country.
Edit: It's kind of like how Barack Obama suggested there would be no conservative opinion in America if it weren't for Fox News.
In hindsight, how much did Jon Stewart lead to the sheer shitting of the ability to discuss things in this country? He seemed to champion simply ignoring all dissenting viewpoints to a degree nobody did before.
Hell, I remember the 2016 election the Seattle media literally followed around the one Trump voter in Seattle with a microphone for several weeks after the election, to try to understand this strange and alien creature.
I remember the after election coverage on PBS. Where Judy Woodruff (I think) said something like 'This outcome is completely unexpected. Do we journalists live in our own bubble?'
That self-awareness lasted about three minutes.
Robinson, after being repeatedly contacted by his parents, indicated to them that he was suicidal; they convinced him to come to their family home in Washington, Utah, and the parents contacted a family friend who is a retired deputy sheriff who helped call the proper authorities...Prosecutors are seeking the death penalty...Robinson seems so bizarre—relatively recently radicalized, not totally estranged from a loving family.
Well I hope the parents in that loving family get some comfort in knowing that they assisted the state in killing their kid rather than letting the kid do anything rash..
Oh, has Reason even discussed the Kash Patel exchange with Schiff? Jesus H. Keerist, they need to build a 900' tall statue of Kash Patel that casts a sun-blotting shadow on the Lincoln Memorial.
My only critique is that the aid behind Schiff could've done a little better job on her ring-girl outfit.
You should see Nancy Mace going scorched earth on Omar right now.
https://x.com/NancyMace/status/1968339223112790418
"Coming from someone who calls her brother “husband,” that’s rich."
Now go run to the media was great.
After yesterday, Patel deserves a statue. I beg them to bring him back weekly.