Charlie Kirk Assassinated
Plus: Poland and NATO, gene editing and God, and more...

A dark day: Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old conservative activist (and father of two), was murdered yesterday at a campus speaking event in Utah. We seem to be entering an era of heightened political violence. It is profoundly, disturbingly sad. And it may have consequences we cannot yet know.
Kirk was fiery, passionate, and provocative. He valued the art of persuasion, of discourse, of changing a mind or letting your own be molded, as it so often is, by fierce exchange. He was a great evangelist for the conservative cause, launching Turning Point USA back in 2012, just a year or two before that wave of wokeness really infiltrated, with backing from former Tea Party types. His sense of timing was impeccable.
He took young people seriously and saw college campuses as the ideological incubators that they are—for good ideas, and for toxic ones. As he grew up, he modeled the values he professed: He was a married father of two young children, and a devout Christian. He returned to college campuses—like Utah Valley University, where he was yesterday—even as he amassed more and more fame, featuring a "Prove Me Wrong" table at these events, where he'd invite some students to debate him.
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
"The Great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead. No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie," wrote President Donald Trump on social media. "He was loved and admired by ALL, especially me, and now, he is no longer with us."
In an address following the assassination, Trump called Kirk a "martyr for truth and freedom."
"My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country," Trump said. But lots of people on the left just couldn't resist the urge to blame Kirk for his own demise, or suppress their hatred of the president even for a few moments. "[He is] constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech, aimed at certain groups," said Matthew Dowd on MSNBC. "I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which often then to hateful actions." MSNBC anchor Katy Tur speculated that the president might "use the Charlie Kirk shooting as a justification for something bad." (Prosecuting the killer, once found, to the full extent that the law allows does not strike me as "something bad" but maybe Tur disagrees.)
Predictions: Will the new deplatforming consist of colleges claiming that security for conservative speakers is just too darn expensive? Look for ways this might get twisted into a means of controlling right-leaning speech. Will the many MSNBC pundits who said nasty things face any professional consequences for their seemingly sincere beliefs (that conservatives have it coming, or that they're reaping what they've sown, or that political violence is in some way justified)? (So far, one actually has.) Masks just keep slipping every time this kind of thing happens.
Bluesky is reacting exactly like you would have expected pic.twitter.com/oQAPtyjgrL
— Robert Sterling (@RobertMSterling) September 10, 2025
Last year, an extremist tried to assassinate Trump, then campaigning in Butler, Pennsylvania. A few months ago, a Free-Palestiner named Elias Rodriguez murdered two young Israeli embassy staffers—on the eve of their engagement—outside an event for young Jewish professionals. There was the murder of health care executive Brian Thompson, for which Luigi Mangione will be prosecuted by New York, Pennsylvania, and the federal government. And prominent Democrats like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–N.Y.) seem to think stricter gun control—something Kirk would have vociferously opposed—will stop it all.
No, the rot is deeper, and it's not just left-on-right. There was that right-wing crazy who shot and killed several Minnesota state lawmakers in June, for example.
But there is also a disturbing strain emerging specifically on the left that makes light of political violence and seems to revel in bad things happening to the ideological enemies, like we're all playacting life, like deadly violence isn't real and concrete and something that permanently deprives children of their fathers, something that can't be taken back.
Just two days before the shooting, the women's magazine Jezebel posted an article about paying "Etsy witches to curse Charlie Kirk." When Mangione killed Thompson, the famous and highly-paid journalist Taylor Lorenz—formerly an employee of The Washington Post and The New York Times—said on Piers Morgan's TV show that she felt "joy." ("Joy at a man's execution?!" balked Morgan.)
Whether Thompson or Trump or the Israeli embassy staffers or Kirk, whether "joy" or justification, this way madness lies. We don't want to relive the '60s, that decade that saw the killings of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, Medgar Evers and John F. Kennedy, Fred Hampton and Malcolm X (some of whom were justifiers of political violence to achieve their objectives). We don't want to relive the '70s, which saw just staggering amounts of political violence emanating from the left wing.
It's not just that Charlie Kirk's kids will grow up without a father, though that's a tragedy. It's also that the thousands of young people in the audience at Utah Valley University will live with this horrible image: watching a man just a few years older than them get shot for professing his conservative beliefs, blood gushing out of his neck. And who, exactly, will want to speak freely in the aftermath, knowing that sort of violence is now on the menu?
31 years old, 2 kids https://t.co/pSRLWMZ32C pic.twitter.com/L1PYSvJo0l
— Mason (@webdevMason) September 10, 2025
Scenes from New York: Today's the 24th anniversary of 9/11, that horrible day in which terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and a third location that shall forever remain unknown as passengers summoned the courage to take over and crash the plane into a field in Pennsylvania instead, sparing the targets but sacrificing themselves in the process. I'm going to Mass at my church in Lower Manhattan today, where we honor the firefighters who died, and pray for their families (many of whom are in attendance). My son and I go every year and it's always very beautiful; Irish and Italian and a lot louder than usual, and I always look around at the men and women who are my age, many of whom lost their dads when they were young, and am just struck with appreciation for these firefighters' sacrifice. Bless them all.
QUICK HITS
- "Selecting for liars is bad," argues Kelsey Piper over at The Argument. But the way our welfare system is designed incentivizes lying vs. telling the truth. So does the way our federal-government hiring works, and the way many cities' zoning codes work.
- "Poland sought a consultation of NATO powers after shooting down drones that crossed into its territory during Russia's latest massive air strike on Ukraine, calling the incursion an 'act of aggression,'" reports Bloomberg. "North Atlantic Treaty Organization Secretary General Mark Rutte denounced 'Russia's reckless behavior' and confirmed that the alliance discussed the incident after Poland invoked Article 4 of the alliance treaty, which triggers consultations and can open a path to coordinated action among allies." ("Polish authorities registered 19 airspace violations, with a 'significant' number of drones originating from Belarusian territory.")
- Tablet Editor in Chief Alana Newhouse takes to the pages of The Free Press to reconcile her belief in gene editing with her belief in God.
- Yup:
this is the single most psychotic use of passive framing in a headline I've ever seen.
they weren't star-crossed lovers. he slit her throat on a fucking train, Jeff. https://t.co/fzwXjIT3K2 pic.twitter.com/KTOLGj7isP
— pagliacci the hated ???? (@Slatzism) September 9, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
RIP Charlie Kirk
RIP, Charlie Kirk.
It is a very sad time for the US, for freedom and especially for free speech.
You’ll just have to get used to it.
I'm afraid I will.
Too soon to laugh, but that was a good one and why I always enjoy a DLAM jab.
done properly it is never too soon to laugh.
Yeah. Nobody believes you.
But good impulse control not joining the rest of your allies yesterday.
Shrike, sarc, and all your other allies tried the same thing prior to demeaning Charlie and attacking MAGA. So yeah. Nobody believes you actually care.
Shrike is a pathological liar and pedophile that comes to one of the few places that hasn’t banned his accounts/turned him in to authorities to get his supply.
We can argue that at another time and place. Let's leave this 1st comment thread as a peaceful tribute to Charlie.
Thanks to you democrats, there is in peace. If you want things to be peaceful, renounce the democrat party and all its evil works, here and now.
Sorry, but I'm going to disagree with you on this one. I think QB's statement here is entirely sincere.
I dont. He has pushed much of the rhetoric that leads the left to these attacks, such as claims of immigration enforcement being "disappearing" people. Also his entire shtick with we have always had crime, so no big deal.
Not once has he criticized democrats for their rhetoric. Even here I doubt he ever criticizes the actual acts here.
Justified lawfare, j6 and other forms of political abuse against conservatives.
So no, I dont buy it. In my view he is more concerned of the optics of how this makes his allies look.
That's fine. I'm going to choose to take him at his word on this one.
Thanks RR, I appreciate you saying so despite our frequent disagreements. You're a standup guy.
We lost a master debater, he would master debate all over those college girls.
I’m willing to help take up the fight.
I agree. Well-said.
RIP.
Agreed.
I would argue this is not a new era but continued. From antifa assaults, BLM murders, scalise, multiple assassination attempts etc. Liz is wrong it is a new era.
This one solely because Charlie was an effective communicator. My daughter and her friends all watched his debates. She was angry yesterday.
How old is that Welch Red Wedding Twitter post? Is he gleefully dancing around proclaiming "one down!!"
I posted it below.
Yes. The left has been extremely violent for at least a decade now, it’s finally time end their movement. The democrat party is a terror organization and must be designated as such. And all the democrat propaganda organizations like NYT, WaPo, etc. must be shut down.
They’re all guilty of multitudes of FEC violations. Enough so that RICO should apply to any of them.
RIP, Charlie Kirk.
They're making it very difficult to not be a conspiracy theorist.
Don’t think it is a conspiracy as much as one political persuasion believes the speech of others is violence and their own violence is justified speech. The age of entitlement.
If we end up knowing as much about this shooter as the Las Vegas sniper, you'll know there was a decent about of conspiring going on here.
Maybe.....
ATF and other law-enforcement located an older model imported Mauser .30-06 caliber bolt action rifle wrapped in a towel in a wooded area near the campus. The location of the firearm appears to match the suspects route of travel. The spent cartridge was still chambered in addition to three unspent rounds at the top fed magazine. All cartridges have engraved wording on them, expressing transgender and anti-fascist ideology.
“Anti-Fascism” = violently killing those peaceful people smarter than you with which you disagree.
A perfect summation
"...“Anti-Fascism” = violently killing those peaceful people smarter than you with which you disagree..."
The cunt Molly Godiva proves this with every post.
If it’s antifa, then they must all be rounded up as terrorists. Which should have happened years ago.
The close-up video didn’t look like a hit from a 5.56x45 where I equated it to a CXP2/3 hunting cartridge impact. So if it were a .30-06 with a soft point, the results looked as such. But don’t know.
The 48-hour rule in effect/fog of war.
A ‘98 Mauser converted to 30/06 from 8mm; interesting as you don’t see those every day.
Probably a rebarrel. Interams sold lots of those in the 50s and 60s from surplus mauser actions as mark x models. There are 61 for sale on gunbroker at the moment.
Unpossible.
I have it on good authority, every democrat ever, that only small caliber, scary-looking, semi-automatic, black rifles with massive magazines are capable of killing.
A bolt action rifle with a four round, non-detachable magazine cannot have done this evil deed.
The Ultimate Entitlement.
Hmmm... Let me rephrase that:
"The Ultimate Entitlement (TM)"
Watching the CSPAN feed from the HoR when Colorado retardus interruptus demanded to make a public ass of herself during the moment of silence for Kirk helps highlight this new age.
TMZ had laughs and cheers in the background when the news he died dropped.
https://x.com/realtimsharp/status/1965893002746036553
They had to follow up claiming those employees were watching a car chase.
Someone posted a video of the car chase. Didn’t see anything funny about it.
Check out the NYT obituary for Kirk. No austere scholar framing.
It’s not like Charlie was a lifelong Islamist terrorist. So how could he be an austere scholar?
Not sure if you noticed the trends yesterday, but this was all justified because they imagine what conservatives and trump would do. A lot of both sides with one side being pure imagination.
My administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it
Talk is cheap, but find another president besides DJT that’ll call out the fuckers in an Oval Office speech.
I agree, Crooks was a bitter clinger MAGA Republican and Kash Patel still hasn’t told us anymore about his motive. Plus the George Floyd violence was instigated by a Trump supporting white supremacist orchestrating a false flag operation.
So what happened to your original account, Rev. Kirkland?
Arty resurrected? That fits. Probably because it got to where he had been muted by everyone. Let's continue that tradition.
Does he have to pay for reason plus?
He valued the art of persuasion, of discourse, of changing a mind or letting your own be molded...
Increasingly a one way street.
But there is also a disturbing strain emerging specifically on the left that makes light of political violence and seems to revel in bad things happening to the ideological enemies, like we're all playacting life, like deadly violence isn't real and concrete and something that permanently deprives children of their fathers, something that can't be taken back.
Like making fun of murder victims by calling them “saint”.
Like 1000's of dancing TikToks celebrating violence.
Not just Kirk, but the Pharma CEO, Trump, the Ukrainian woman, etc. They will celebrate the same way with any of us getting intentionally harmed. Eric July said it perfectly. We need to stop taking the high ground. It is a losing strategy.
The more they show the evil they are the more they loose. MLK and Ghandi knew this. If you are christian, you believe Christ knew this too. For give them, for they know not what they do.
What happened to MLK and Ghandi?
Their ideas prevailed. We are all dead men walking. The only thing that lives on is our legacy. MLK's is on the ropes these days unfortunately.
Did MLKs & Gandis ideas prevail? I doubt that more every day.
"Content of character over color of skin?" Just imagine what leftists rags would make of that today. Meritocracy, supremacist thinking, any number of isms.
MLK would be the Ultimate Uncle Tom nowadays.
https://x.com/TheLucyShow1/status/1965932486736908620
Left wingers who witnessed the murder cheered.
That young lady saw something no young lady should ever have to see, a man getting shot in the neck and gushing blood from a carotid artery due to expressing his First Amendment rights on a stage. I agree with her, those celebrating are disgusting.
That’s an image I’ll never get out of my head after I saw it on X.
California named a fucking bill after Luigi. This isnt just small time random activists.
Something like 60% of democrats support ideological murder.
The democrat party is a terror organization. They are inextricably intertwined with antifa, BLM, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, the an Iranian regime, the ChiComs {who own many democrat legislators and our last president), and so many other terror groups.
Cleanse them.
It is not "emerging". It has been out in light for some time now. Certain people are just now noticing.
Liz has been sheltered in NYC. She needs to escape that dump ASAP.
One of the most fucked up things about this, is seeing dozens and dozens of posts celebrating this assassination, and realizing that a majority of the non-anonymous posters are in either education or healthcare.
Lesson of war: You can’t change human nature.
https://notthebee.com/article/here-is-a-roundup-of-the-teachers-social-workers-firefighters-city-councilors-and-marines-who-are-celebrating-charlie-kirks-death
“If they thought Charlie Kirk was too extreme and deserved to die, imagine what they think of you”
Predictions: Will the new deplatforming consist of colleges claiming that security for conservative speakers is just too darn expensive?
We've heard that tune before. Honestly, I'm surprised many of them allowed his events in the first place.
There was that right-wing crazy who shot and killed several Minnesota state lawmakers in June, for example.
There's very little evidence that guy was right-wing, and a substantial amount that he was left-wing. If you believe otherwise, please do attempt to prove it. Just because his victims were left-wing (ish) doesn't mean he's on the right.
Yup. A soft boaf sidez is still a boaf sidez. Like when one Team R legislator supported Team D that somehow became bipartisan.
Her source article was NPR.....
If the guy was verifiably right-wing, don't you think it would be covered a lot more in much more reliable sources than NPR? And still be in the news perhaps?
Without a doubt. That story disappeared unbelievably fast considering he was in custody within hours and they never let a politically advantageous story go to waste.
Did you actually read the source? It's an outdated article from June 2nd. We have much more information now.
In case anyone is wondering why Vance Boelter was memoryholed, it's because he was not a sane person motivated by typical left/right politics. He is a religious fanatic. His reason for targeting politicians? They were pro-choice. The full list of targets was not made public, but reputable orgs like AP have reported that in addition to politicians, community leaders and abortion rights activists were also named.
Is that political? Sure. Is it "right wing" violence? Only if you believe that abortion is a right/left issue. Most reasonable people recognize it isn't.
The pro choice article was debunked. The crazy part was not.
He prior worked with NGOs. He was appointed to boards by Waltz. He claimed Waltz told him to kill those running against him for senate.
He has given public interviews. He did not due it for abortion reasons.
What do you mean debunked? I just checked recent articles from local Minnesota publications since the story was dropped at a national level.
My understanding is that we still don't know, but there wasn't anything plainly obvious other than the abortion connection. AFAIK, none of the facts asserted have been debunked unless you:
1. Believe the AP made up the contents of the list.
2. Believe that Boelter is not a missionary and that the sermons he wrote are not his work.
3. Believe his friends/associates are all lying about him being religious and reserved.
I would check this out. I have not seen any of these facts debunked.
https://minnesotareformer.com/2025/08/18/did-religion-motivate-assassination-of-minnesota-lawmaker/
In one of his interviews he explicitly said his list was not about abortions. His list included people on both sides of the issue.
Ok, but he's insane and the full list is not publicly known. Why are we taking his word when there's an ongoing criminal trial? He plead not guilty. Doubt he would go on tape and say why he really did it. Plus, what he says doesn't debunk what he has physically done in this world.
Boelter is clearly delusional and is claiming that he had worked undercover for mostly unspecified government agencies. He was obviously involved with Democrats in MN and was appointed to a board by Tim Walz. He claimed that Walz asked him to assassinate Amy Klochubar because he wanted her senate seat and that other MN democrats were somehow involved. Yes he was at one point a evangelical minister but he also has a long history of crazy sketchy shit none of which includes association with right wing or pro life organizations. His roommates say he wasn't overtly political and he says abortion was not a motivation. He could be lying but the dude is batshit crazy so it's pretty difficult to judge either way. Bottom line, these were political assassinations because the victims were politicians. But there is no evidence that he was motivated by right wing beliefs. The dude is delusional and batshit crazy. Sorry but that's the only rational conclusion.
I agree completely. Sorry if I didn't come across that way. I do feel he shouldn't be lumped in with the rest of the political violence examples for that reason. I was just trying to provide as many facts as possible to prove that he wasn't a good example.
There's plenty of religious people on the left, this is not in question.
He worked for Walz...
His list also include republicans the guy was literraly crazy like most shooters. Even the two people who attempted to kill Trump were deranged. the person who shot Kirk was well prepared and clearly out for political purposes
Like I said yesterday, Trantifa's been openly stating on social media that they're going to be carrying out assassinations from here on out, which would clearly fall under the rubric of a confession of conspiracy to commit murder and domestic terrorism.
If Patel isn't already telling the FBI and Mama Tulsi to find out who controls those accounts and to start bringing charges, he's completely impotent and needs to be replaced. He's already fucked up once by announcing that they supposedly caught the killer before letting him go, and I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is telling him that he's on thin ice.
The other weird instance, which may or may not be coincidental, was the report of that private aircraft that took off from Provo about an hour after the shooting, illegally turned off its tracking device during the trip, and re-emerged at some bumfuck airstrip in Tuba City, Arizona. I've been through there, and it is about as remote as you could possibly imagine.
So given that the rifle and bullets had a bunch of Trantifa shit written on them, if that flight is in any way connected to the shooting, now we're looking at the possibility of a classic false flag attack. One of Kirk's buddies said that Kirk had told him recently that he was getting pushback from people in Israel over his criticisms of the conflict, and was concerned there might be a backlash. Something like that flight would bear all the hallmarks of professional hit, and quick egress for transfer in an area that wasn't heavily monitored.
But again, that's all speculation, like the theory that the reason Biden and Trump chose not to release the Epstein files isn't because THEY are in them, but because Epstein was acting as a Mossad agent or contact, and opening the files would really fuck up relations with Israel.
That's a big leap that I'm not willing to discount. The whole Trantifa shit on the ammo doesn't make much sense for any reason, even if the assassin was. At a minimum, the person was prepared and had an exit plan. However much bigger it is than that, I hope we eventually find out.
I don't think Kash said they had caught the killer. A person of interest was detained at the scene I think by local police but was determined to be uninvolved. Looks like they have video of the shooter at this point but we're only one day in so it might take a while.
There has to be a legit example on right-on-left political violence, though. We're a nation of 330 million, after all.
Abortion clinic bombings? Those haven't happened in years though.
More then 500 attacks on catholic churches since 2020.
O wait you were looking for the other way
Christians praying outside of abortion clinics!
Nice. I wish it were hard to believe that this action is actually considered violence in the UK and all of it shitshow provinces around the globe. Proof that the left is a cancer in the entire western world, not just here.
Majority of attacks that happen against birthing centers or abortion centers are on birthing centers. More than 2 to 1. Prosecution for FACE is almost exclusively for anti abortion protests. Virtually all for quietly praying.
Get a load of the bigot that never heard of tire tracks on a rainbow crosswalk.
Do Trump's mean tweets count?
Mostly, right wing terrorists seem to be incompetent. From a long list of attempted attacks and various conspiracies, here are some that actually did harm.
Colorado Springs, November 19, 2022. Anderson Lee Aldrich was charged with 317 crimes, including five counts of first-degree murder, for a November 19, 2022 shooting spree against an LGBTQ+ nightclub.
San Francisco, California, October 28, 2022. David DePape invaded the home of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in a self-described “suicide mission” to kidnap her and “break her kneecaps” to serve as an object lesson for other Democrats.
Kalamazoo, Michigan, July 31, 2022. On the afternoon of July 31, a masked man dressed in camouflage used a combustible log and fuel to set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Kalamazoo.
Buffalo, New York, May 14, 2022. In an elaborately planned attack, white supremacist Payton Gendron opened fire at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York, deliberately targeting Black people.
Atlanta, Georgia, July 30, 2021. Larry Edward Foxworth, a self-described white supremacist, conducted an attempted shooting spree from a vehicle against two convenience stores in an Atlanta suburb. Both stores had customers and staff inside when attacked, but luckily no one was hit. After his arrest, Foxworth confessed that he shot at the stores in an attempt to kill Black people and Arab people. Foxworth subsequently pleaded guilty to federal hate crime charges and received a 20-year sentence.
Winthrop, Massachusetts, June 26, 2021. White supremacist Nathan Allen stole a truck and crashed it into a residence in Winthrop, Massachusetts. As people in the neighborhood responded, Allen walked by several white people to shoot two people of color, a man and a woman. He shot one victim seven times, including four times in the head, and the other victim three times in the back, killing both. Responding police shot and killed Allen. Subsequent searches revealed that Allen possessed considerable white supremacist literature as well as journals in which recorded his racist and antisemitic beliefs, including the idea that white people were superior “apex predators.” He also wrote that “whites in the US will snap and kill all the shitskins."
Almost none of those examples are for political purposes, and rely on ADL subscribing right wing views to the person.
And like the other fucked up leftist retards you even tried to include the Pelosi attacker as right wing.
Disgusting behavior from your side.
You are trying to equate every bad act from racist groups to conservatives to justify shooting a Christian conservative. Go. Fuck. Yourself.
Amazing watching you assholes justify this murder any way you can.
I don't know if all of these are true, though I'm sure 90% of the commenters will refute them with or without evidence. What I do know is this in so close to being only a left-on-right problem that we can treat it as such.
If you want an own the libs scenario, stop calling for counter-violence. Instead sick all of the intelligence agencies on the radical leftist groups in America, which are legion. Revoke their tax-exempt status, put them under surveillance, audit their funders, etc. It seemed to be quite effective at quashing right-wing violence the last 50 years, so who could argue with it?
The only apparent attack on a political figure in all of your examples was the guy who hit Pelosi's husband with a hammer, and he's most definitely not motivated by right-wing politics.
And not one of those "examples" were right wing political violence.
Colorado Springs, November 19, 2022. Anderson Lee Aldrich
The guy who attacked the gay bar was also gay you stupid fuck. He was a former gay porn actor, FFS. How are you this fucking retarded?
Also, from wikipedia: "Twice before the 2021 incident Aldrich had been reported to Colorado Police for "escalating homicidal behavior".[68] On June 17, 2021, Aldrich's grand-aunt contacted the FBI to report Aldrich was planning to kill Christians and government employees after Aldrich's grandfather had reported being threatened by Aldrich; however, the family did not press charges with local police."
San Francisco, California, October 28, 2022. David DePape
Explain how a rent boy attacking his john is "right-wing". Where's the politics there?
Kalamazoo, Michigan, July 31, 2022. On the afternoon of July 31, a masked man dressed in camouflage used a combustible log and fuel to set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Kalamazoo.
WTF is this doing in here? He committed arson. He didn't kill anyone, unlike the abattoir he lit up. You guys burn buildings all the time so pretty gutsy of you to equate it to murder.
Are you that desperate that you would try to sneak an arson into a list of purported political assassinations?
Buffalo, New York, May 14, 2022. In an elaborately planned attack, white supremacist Payton Gendron
Not right wing. Racist. Just like Sarah Palin's Buttplug, the Democrats historically, Karl Marx and Che Guevara.
Atlanta, Georgia, July 30, 2021. Larry Edward Foxworth, a self-described white supremacist,
Not right wing. Racist. Just like Sarah Palin's Buttplug, the Democrats historically, Karl Marx and Che Guevara.
Winthrop, Massachusetts, June 26, 2021. White supremacist Nathan Allen
Not right wing. Racist. Just like Sarah Palin's Buttplug, the Democrats historically, Karl Marx and Che Guevara.
You do now know that the Biden/Democrat White Supremacy is the greatest threat to America statement were a projection of themselves?
How can people be so stupid to believe racism is only on the right?
The democrat party is the party of racism and Biden glorified Byrd...
Both sides have individuals who commit violence for political purposes. But they carry it out in different ways.
The left-on-right political violence tends to be acts against specific individuals with a relatively clear agenda. Like Luigi, like Charlie Kirk's murderer.
The right-on-left political violence, on the other hand, tends to be more diffuse, not directed against specific people, but against "society" in a broad sense. Such as, the El Paso Walmart shooter, the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter, the Buffalo supermarket shooter. Their targets were not specific people. They were directed against people or groups whom the shooter believed were enemies of the right in a broad sense, like "the Jews" or "the Blacks" or "the Hispanics".
I think this is rooted by how each side tends to identify the villains on the other side. The left-wing shooters tend to think that the villains are specific people - Trump, Charlie Kirk, CEOs, etc. The right-wing shooters tend to think that the villains are broad classes of people out to undermine America as a whole - immigrants, gays, etc.
Not even remotely close to anything coherent.
Yeah, big swing and miss with the "both sides!" attempt. I even clicked into the link Liz included and after reading through the whole article (NPR, lol) the only mention any sort of political affiliation is -
"Officials also said they found "No Kings" flyers in the car, a reference to the anti-Trump protests that happened around the country Saturday."
I was watching a history professor's clip on the historical distinction between Hitler's Fascism and Stalin's Socialism and saw this [paraphrased] gem in the comments:
"It's like seeing a tiger fight a lion and concluding that because the lion is a carnivore and they're fighting, the tiger must be an herbivore."
To say nothing of the usual no-shit libertarian rhetoric about a private citizen of either/any stripe taking back his liberties from oppressive lawmakers of either/any stripe is categorically different than shooting someone in cold blood for saying things you don't like.
"It's like seeing a tiger fight a lion and concluding that because the lion is a carnivore and they're fighting, the tiger must be an herbivore."
And it's because fascism and communism, insofar as they could be put on the political spectrum, are only different as a matter of degree. The fight between Stalin and Hitler was ultimately over territory, not political ideology. Two sides supposedly on the complete opposite end of the spectrum don't strike a deal to invade Poland, split the spoils, and let each other have free rein in their own spheres of influence.
Fascism became classed a "right-wing" belief system only after the fact, and that was mainly due to western marxists being pissed at Hitler for violating the pact. But it's also why they call any inkling of patriotic feeling and pride in US/western civilization as "fascist". Anything that doesn't advance global communism is fascist, and since they're on the left, fascism is on the right by default.
That and the most simple truth, the left needed a boogy man on the right. Marxists, socialists and communists needed to ensure there is an evil boogy man on the right. Just as they suggest someone who is religious is on the right which is just as absurd.
And it has worked. That's why society at large doesn't look at someone wearing a Che shirt as similar to someone wearing a Hitler shirt. Both are evil, racist killers, but one is venerated and the other condemned, when both deserve condemnation from everyone.
Last year, an extremist tried to assassinate Trump...
Extremist? We know even that much about Crooks? I'm predicting we'll know even less about the Kirk assassin(s), if they ever even really catch him.
Weird use of the singular. It was 2.
"We know even that much about Crooks?"
Here's a reply from a certified TDS-addled lying pile of slimy shit:
Sam Bankman-Fried
"...These people that can’t accept that Crooks was a Republican simply can’t accept reality and aren’t worthy of my replies."
Extremist? We know even that much about Crooks?
[Norm McDonald "I don't think that was the worst part" voice]
The more relevant information is the number of behaviorally-similar individuals.
[/Norm McDonald voice]
Bluesky is reacting exactly like you would have expected
Has have several* commentors here.
*really they are just one pedo from dogdick
I had to give up on that whole thread. It was disturbing and disgusting.
Lots of new gray boxes from now on
Yeah. I usually only Grey for the most extreme. But done with all them. A lot of Grey's now.
Well the most extream have shown themselves
Unpleasant truths are often the most important truths to know. You have to understand what the left is to figure out how to effectively oppose it.
Yeah, that thread last night had some of the most disgusting individuals in it. I had to stop lest I start saying shit here that’ll a) get me banned and b) interest the FBI.
The akita chapter of the woodchipper union asked its members to stay away from making social media posts.
It's pretty telling that most of those commenters rarely post, but as soon as Kirk was murdered, they all log in to celebrate and taunt the rest of us. Pretty fucking sick.
Even the MN killer that they're saying was right wing (which I haven't seen sufficient evidence for that). None of us were celebrating those murders. There is a serious problem in this country now with people saying on polls that they think it's acceptable for politicians they don't like (and now Kirk who wasn't even a politician) to be assassinated. (And while right-wing respondents to these polls have increased in the number that think political violence is okay, the left are multiples higher that support it.) That kind of violence didn't have mainstream support until much more recently, and I fear it's going to increase.
I REALLY hope I'm wrong, but I suspect there will be more assassinations or assassination attempts against more people on the right. We've already seen the massive swatting attempts on even minor right wing personalities. This is just escalating it to the next level. The level after this will be scary if it comes to pass.
When speech is considered violence, and violence is considered speech, we are likely done as a country.
I'm aware of the possibility or even likelihood that some/all of those commenters were socks of regular commenters here.
Like with covid hysteria, reaction to this event helps expose people’s true nature.
On this of all days, remember there were people all over the world celebrating 9/11. And more so celebrating 10/7.
That Venn diagram looks an awful lot like a circle.
With a giant D inside.
For the (D)amn (D)isgusting (D)icks.
By sharing child porn?
"*really they are just one pedo from dogdick"
He posted an entire list of "right-wing" killers yesterday which turned out to be a list of incidents alleged to be racially motivated, and had nothing to do with politics.
That's right. The guy who calls black people "coons", "shine boys" and "lawn Jockeys" right here in the comments is trying to claim that they were conservative because they were racist.
Remember folks, you don't tell Shrike to "fuck off" enough. You may think that you do, but you don't.
Bubba just did the same above. They cant help but seek means to defend this assassination.
Bubba is Shrike, isn't he?
They're all scared to use their regular nicks today so they're all socking.
Could be. Hasn't had the usual ticks shrike uses to give himself away.
But there is also a disturbing strain emerging specifically on the left that makes light of political violence and seems to revel in bad things happening to the ideological enemies...
Once the right decides to join in in earnest (and they're getting pushed pretty hard to do just that) it's going to get a whole lot uglier.
Once both sides are fully committed to violence it can go on forever.
Bulwark and others are demanding conservatives retreat back to their timid and never fight back ways. Think we are in the mutually assured destruction phase.
Fuck the Bulwark.
It’ll go on until one side is exhausted.
That's what I'm afraid of. How many times did AOC die on J6? How many more times will she die now?
Hopefully just 1 more
Yeah, once people who just want to be left alone to live their lives are convinced that violence is inevitable, things change a lot. We don't want to see what that looks like. The right is in general less willing to engage in political violence, but they are much better prepared for it.
This is why the left has spent a decade criminalizing self defense like with Daniel Penny.
Bernard Goetz was the pilot program though I believe much of the press was sympathetic at that time.
They played the game with Rittenhouse until they couldn't as well.
Jorge Zimmerman as well. Recall one of the MSM outlets chopping up the 911 call.
So lucky it was on video.
'but they are much better prepared for it'
I have several liberal friends who think that 100 rounds is a lot of ammunition.
"100 rounds is a lot of ammunition."
For one magazine, maybe.
We seem to be entering an era of heightened political violence. It is profoundly, disturbingly sad. And it may have consequences we cannot yet know.
Not "may have consequences"; there will be consequences. The left thinks they can just murder conservatives without consequences. The media gaslights everyone into believing the killers are conservatives.
The shit is about to change.
I really doubt that. In a tit for tat, the Democrats will always have an advantage because they have a large pool of mentally ill people who will sacrifice their lives/freedom to kill heretics.
It's not unlike Islam and suicide bombers.
^-this
The left does have an army of brainwashed kooks, but they are mostly girls with He-Man bangs and men(?) who couldn't impregnate a woman with George Foreman's dick.
The right (or at least anti-left) has loads of self-radicalized kooks who have been arming for a Russian invasion for years. If the floodgates do break, the damage would likely be 30-1 for every reaction against the left. Unless, of course, the government puts its thumb on the scale. But what are the chances of that?
For the record, I'm not in favor of a violent reaction to the left's utter evil. Their ideas have been disproved and their ugliness is on full display. Let them die of atrophy, not martyrism.
Uh, it’s dangerous to forget how close the USSR and their friends in western establishments came to burning the whole shit house down.
The time to really start worrying is when the left sheds their woke mask and starts distancing themselves from the traditional cast of useful idiots. They’re a stupid lot of evil fucks, but eventually they’re going to figure it out and get serious.
That’s when it gets ugly, do or die once more for the US, and we’ll be lucky if the war is cold again.
They also have institutions willing to support political violence.
The classic morality question regarding murder in American culture is to ask if you could go back in time to kill Hitler would you? Most people say yes.
So what do you think they're doing when they call their enemies Hitler / Nazis / fascists? They're leading their most extreme adherents to that same conclusion.
I would have travelled further back in time and stopped Zimmermann from sending that telegraph. Or stopped Princip from firing those two shots.
How about just go back and bitchslap Eve?
They should have slain the serpent in the garden.
"So what do you think they're doing when they call their enemies Hitler / Nazis / fascists? They're leading their most extreme adherents to that same conclusion."
This is why we need an honest press. It surely illustrates that we have nothing LIKE an honest press, because if we did we would see more of this kind of insight. Instead they push the opposite.
They haven't figured out that this only sharpens our instincts.
Sadly you are spot on.
How many years have the Left been saying they can "punch Nazis", with them being judge, jury and executioner defining a rather expansive meaning of "Nazi"?
And how many times have activist judges not only dismissed cases when they do, but often pay them through civil suits for even being arrested.
They didn't seem to care about "due process" when they were saying it's good to "punch Nazis."
Morning poll, do leftists deserve to live
1 for no
2 for hell no
3. Of course, win with ideas
Ask Charlie Kirk how that goes.
He would have done less good and probably still be dead if he'd started killing motherfuckers instead of trying to win with ideas. This is disgusting and tragic, but it can get a lot worse.
If Charlie Kirk had done as suggested he would have just been another Democratic Party talking point rather than their scourge.
He was murdered for being effective at winning with ideas. The glee on the left over his murder comes from the damage he was causing their political agenda solely from spreading his ideas on "their" turf.
You mean like the idea of making the other poor bastard die for his, right?
I agree about the lesser effectiveness about wanton slaughter. I disagree about the effectiveness of ideas or morality that carries no risk or avoids it at all costs.
Just two days before the shooting, the women's magazine Jezebel-
Stop right there.
What is a woman?
What is a magazine?
Sort of like a clip, right? Or is it the thing that goes up?
How many high-powered fully semiautomatic clips does the magazine hold?
Sounds like a direct quote from any leftist publication.
I'm going to Mass at my church in Lower Manhattan today, where we honor the firefighters who died, and pray for their families (many of whom are in attendance).
The more distance from the event the less we contemplate the lessons we should have learned from that day.
NYC is soon to have an Islamist mayor. No lessons have been learned.
To be fair his (mostly) unabashed socialism spells more a lesson New Yorkers seem to have yet to learn.
Including fair Liz.
I'm a little shocked she moved but not out of NYC. You seem to recognize the shitstorm coming. You're moving already and thus incurring the life upheaval anyway. But you stay for the shitstorm?
Bizarre.
Sad but true.
Shit, less than 10 years later the USA put one in the White House.
Obama was more of a queers for palestine islamist than allhu akbar kind.
Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know.
https://x.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12
A tweet in response to Mueller Report/ Impeachment disinfo.
What a disgusting useless pile of Establishment crap Welch is
Commenters could start flooding KMW’s inbox and demand that Welch be let go for him advocating for political violence in the age of political violence against the right.
Matthew Dowd just got fired for less.
That fucker got his firing the hard way. He earned it. May such happen to more of these fucking ghouls.
Do we push KMW to dump Welch?
Unequivocally, fuck yes.
kmw@reason.com
Include the post and call for a stance against political violence.
https://x.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12
They're having him talk about Charlie later. I think KMW doesn't care at all.
Yep. It's a rage bait situation for clicks. Got to be.
Not sure she has been posed with the concept that she is employing someone that publicly advocated for the deaths of people having a different political perspective.
Murdering your political enemies is fun!
A dark day
No, it’s not. He was a grifting, low class douche. Ask Orwell how he felt about killing fascists.
Your definition of "fascist" shows that you are a stupid and evil person.
He thought Orwell’s “newspeak” were instructions.
The left is full of retards that don't know fascism is directly from marxism
Reminder that this is not Sandra, folks.
It's either Shrike, KAR or Sarcasmic who have stolen her nick so that they can celebrate the murder of Kirk without having it backfire on them later.
Remember to never stop telling those creepy old monsters to go fuck themselves.
I would agree. This isn’t Sandra. It’s not her style.
My money is on Buttplug, Sandra was always rubbing his face in his own bullshit.
I think I’ve deduced Sam Bankman-Fried is our old fiend, Rev. Kirkland. Same tics about bitter clingers.
I saw that too. But it was such an obvious tell for Rev. Kirkland, that I'm suspecting that it could still be Bushpig2 using that term intentionally to throw suspicion off of himself.
And Trump is now promoting policies that resemble both Fascism and Marxism. He even has his blackshirts (ICE). And he now has a controlling ownership interest in multiple major businesses, with more to come.
They will come for you eventually.
Parody
The nazis built walls to keep people in
Have you ever not been retarded?
Marxism/socialism and fascism are two faces of the same dull coin; the differences between them don't amount to a hill of beans. One awards government (elites) control of everything, the other awards control to government (elites) which shares some control with elite private individuals. With Globalism, elite private individuals enjoy a larger share of control and thus exert pressure on governments (elites), but all of it leads to tyranny. Note the two common words associated with all of the above are 1) elites and 2) control.
There you have it, Control Freaks 101.
Libertarians oppose Control Freaks. It's really that simple.
The difference between Fascism and Marxism is that Fascism buys off the well to do; Marxism sends the to the gulag or shoots them. They are both totalitarian and in fact it was Mussolini who invented the term. Trump is Fascist.
that Fascism buys off the well to do
Marxism's been led by the well-to-do since Lenin. Every single rad-left revolutionary movement since the French Revolution has mostly been directed by the radical bourgeoisie, and in the instances they actually manage to get the working classes agitated enough to march, it inevitably peters out because the working classes are concerned about reasonable pay and working conditions, not establishing the communist utopia. The result is that these activist organizers migrate from org to org because nothing ever sticks beyond the next labor agreement.
The difference between charliehall and bull shit, is that bull shit is actually useful sometimes.
Looks like someone panicked and lit up the Batshit Signal (TM) and QUICKLY to the rescue is that Fiend, the pedant, Charlie-Son-Of-Gus to try to shit up the thread with his signature, unadulterated horseshit. He is a veritable walking Wikipedia (that was meant as an insult, of course).
Nothing new under the sun. He believes his bleatings have some power that they don't. We see right through him. Pathetic.
Fail
Do you really want political violence to escalate? Think about if for five minutes before you post next time.
Yes.
I would add, "Think Before You Bleat (TM)."
To clarify:
Yes, think about it...
No, I do NOT want political violence to escalate.
Nor do I. It’s a place I’ve never wanted to go, yet, I’ve a very bad feeling it’s a place we’re going to.
That would be a good lesson for most of the comment section. You can't state (correctly) that the left has been cheering on violence against the right and thus contributed to the actual violence against the right in recent years, and then out of the other side of your mouth plead for reactionary violence against the left. By your own reasoning, you will be culpable for any violence that occurs.
I'm not a lefty, so I don't think words = violence. And I do realize almost all of this is people blowing off some anger in a healthy way, which lefties seem to be incapable of doing. But it's pretty ugly stuff, and I'm not sure you really want to be the mirror image of Jezebel and Jacobin.
So, we just sit back and be attacked and murdered? We are on the precipice of legitimate self-defense, not wanton violence.
Leftists protesting in a street, blocking traffic and your wife/kid/parent is in the car in medical distress. Do you run them down or say "Oh well, I'm not committing violence today."
We already know begging them to move doesn't work.
I do not see a NAP violation with either scenario.
+1
True. The NAP has been violated repeatedly by the left, the Democrats without a response by anyone else as we don’t want to violate the NAP.
Enough of this shit. Once the NAP has been violated by one side, all bets should be off. Why should we play nice with those who’ve already violated the NAP?
I agree with you. Advocating for political violence is as anti-libertarian as it gets. This only leads to rule by sheer force.
Submitting to political violence is what you are suggesting, because it's your side committing the violence.
You are not against political violence; you oppose retribution.
It's already escalated, and only in one direction. Putting down the Marxists like the animals they are will stop it
Fuck off with that shit. Opening the doors to that level of violence against human beings for their (often ridiculous and awful) beliefs is not a path that leads to good things.
Pretty sure he is angry at their actions. From yesterday.
He's been promoting killing people for their political beliefs long before yesterday.
Indeed. This kind of shit is the problem, not the solution.
Usually it is for them to kill themselves. Not others killing them.
The doors have been kicked opened yesterday. What the fuck do you think is going on here?
And yet, that door was kicked down by the left yesterday afternoon. Once the NAP is violated by one side, should the other still try to adhere to it?
This os why the bleeding of the left into the LP has been so dangerous. Theyve convinced a large segment that the NAP means pacifist, convincing them to never respond.
We see it here with political violence.
We see it in the false free market cries of never responding to foreign actors.
We see it in cries of culture war for responding.
The left has done a good job of pacifying libertarians.
After this week, I'm going to start selling "Nardz was right!" t-shirts.
How much$
$1.05!
That is your decision to make. If you stop following the NAP, go on a campaign against the others and are victorious, when you are standing over the bodies of your former adversaries would you be recognizable to the person you were two days ago?
That’s a fair question as well as that type of change is not necessarily for the better.
I don’t favor going on any attack. I do favor self defense that ends the threat.
As long as the defense is actual defense, not a preemptive "defensive" strike.
So wait to be assaulted prior to reacting? That's how you end up battered or dead.
This goes beyond political bullshit; this is everyday life. I'm not taking a bullet for some imaginary high ground.
Let me expand on what I mean;
Actual defense: Someone is coming at you, shoot him.
Preemptive strike: Shoot some guy because you think he *might* come at you.
Dame question asked of El Slavador for coralling up their gangs. Think that turned out just fine.
The NAP is a guide for individual behavior, not interactions between broad political groupings. Claiming that this means it's OK to murder Marxists is not a reasonable application of the NAP. War is what happens when the NAP goes out the window.
Question zeb, though you may not agree with the premise.
If youre in war, do you have to wait for the enemy to fire at you instead of the guy standing next to you?
Now you may not agree this is a cultural war, probably where we differ. But given all the violence on the left, at what point is it appropriate to respond?
How many does antifa have to kill before we can arrest and go after antifa in general?
I'm not zeb, but I'll answer anyway.
Now you may not agree this is a cultural war, probably where we differ.
I think we can agree that a culture war, and a war between or within nations on a physical battlefield with uniformed troops and tanks and artillery etc. are two verry different things.
But given all the violence on the left, at what point is it appropriate to respond?
At what point? As soon as possible. To what degree is the real question. Step one. anyone who actually commits violence, bury him under the jail. Step two is the difficult one. A "call to violence" is interpreted many different ways by different people. It's how the British guy making a joke about punching tranny balls went to court. I know there is a legal definition, but it still isn't black and white. It has to be refined more before you can make action against and antifa heads.
If youre in war, do you have to wait for the enemy to fire at you instead of the guy standing next to you?
No, of course not. That was my whole point about war being when the NAP goes out the window.
I think there is a metaphorical culture war going on. But literal war is a whole different animal. We're getting uncomfortably close to that, but I don't think we're there yet and hope it can be avoided.
You are a slimy pile of TDS-addled lying lefty SHIT.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, Medgar Evers and John F. Kennedy, Fred Hampton and Malcolm X
Dorothy Kilgallen and Marilyn Monroe should always be included on that list. Theirs were political assassinations also.
A commenter below complained that the Left didn't care about objective truth. You are an example of that on the Right. Kilgallen and Monroe both died from drug overdoses.
Cite?
I’m going to pull a page from your playbook.
Charlie Kirk shoved his ideology down the Left’s throat. There’s only so much advocacy for police states, misogyny and racism that the Left could take. What did you expect? Eventually someone was going to react
That’s pretty much what I heard when Anders Breivik killed 70 kids while they went camping from the likes of you guys. That guys killed a bunch of kids. This modern day Dillinger (who hasn’t been caught yet) took out a fascist douche. Big difference. Take your piety and empathy elsewhere. CK wouldn’t want that because to him those things were the domain of weak, faggy cucks.
Which is why I’m glad he’s dead.
^ Example regarding the Age of Entitlement.
Kill yourself
Keep bleating, loser. It amuses us that you think you gain by shitting up the thread on behalf of your handlers - the real fascists. Buffoon! We fart in your general direction.
That’s pretty much what I heard when Anders Breivik killed 70 kids while they went camping from the likes of you guys.
So you went thru the archives back to 2011 to find this?
Was this from before or after you "lost the password" to your account?
Anders Breivik was a Nazi corporatist who held beliefs indistinguishable from today's Democrats. Also, note that NotSandra has to go all the way to Norway a decade and a half ago to find his "right-wing" to find something he can pretend is somehow analogous.
You are a slimy pile of TDS-addled lying lefty SHIT.
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
This is not Sandra, folks. Even in her biggest rages she did not sound like this.
It's either Shrike, KAR or Sarcasmic who have stolen her nick so that they can celebrate the murder of Kirk without having it backfire on them later.
They're so fucking gross.
Agreed, but whoever it is, it is a slimy pile of TDS-addled lying lefty SHIT who should fuck off and die.
It's KAR. Came premuted and one of KARs socks is missing on the mute list.
It is more of KAR’s MO since he danced on a grave before and openly advocated for violence against political opponents but shrike went orgasmic yesterday seeing his opportunity to get copious supply and given his pathology, that’s in play too. Sarcles is the dark horse in that race.
OBL was Open Borders Liberaltarian ...
KAR isnt the brightest.
He is also boring
This is not Sandra, folks.
+1
I have/can/will shame Sandra for her comments and ideas to the point where, IRL, I probably deserve to be punched or slapped in the face. Suffice to say we don't agree. That said, her OBL "I'm just restating Reason contributors' popular opinions." shtick was solid and she's no ghoul or insane noise generator. I don't have her muted, but this post was muted already when I loaded the page.
Pretty sure it’s kar.
Charlie Kirk shoved his ideology down the Left’s throat.
The hilarious part is that he didn't even do that. He just went to college campuses to debate college students. But to leftists, anyone who dares to not follow their dumb political theology is "shoving their ideology down the Left's throat."
You FA and FO, amirite? That’s what you guys have been saying here for years when some Black
Man gets shot by a cop. Spare me your dumb fake piety. You’ve been itching for political violence for years, but the moment the bullets start coming your way you go all kumbaya. Get shot in the neck, fascist.
When are we meeting?
what you guys have been saying here for years when some Black
Man gets shot by a cop.
Cite?
Also, appreciate your complying with the newspeak style guide by capitalizing "Black Man"
You FA and FO, amirite? That’s what you guys have been saying here for years when some Black Man gets shot by a cop. Spare me your dumb fake piety. You’ve been itching for political violence for years, but the moment the bullets start coming your way you go all kumbaya. Get shot in the neck, fascist.
Yes, someone sitting on a college campus minding is own business is completely the same thing as a violent criminal getting shot when he goes after the cops.
And who's going all kumbaya? Your side made it clear a while ago that you think violence is acceptable for you. You're the one who said you were going to stab me in the temple for disagreeing with you, after all. So spare me your own circular reasoning, faggot.
And I gave you the address, remember? Feel free to show up anytime.
So what’s your take on it happening in a Mormon area, KAR?
The gathering in Boise last night to honor Kirk, was disrupted by some dude riding a scooter, wearing a rainbow backpack, and yelling "FUCK CHARLIE KIRK!!"
The crowd beat his ass. Badly.
This is the way.
So, this would be an act of political violence against someone because he said something you disagree with. Right?
Begone demon.
He is] constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech, aimed at certain groups," said Matthew Dowd on MSNBC. "I always go back to, hateful thoughts lead to hateful words, which often then to hateful actions.
Dowd characterized this as "divisive" which I hate. First because it's a weasel word which means it's non-specifically derogatory so the user does not have to defend the position. Further why does "divisive" supposedly matter? It just means disagreement. When Bush was president the left claimed "dissent was the highest form of patriotism" valorizing their own divisiveness. Lastly the term is never used to describe truly vile positions like describing their enemies as fascist and/or Nazis.
Putting these failures together we can conclude "divisive" is code for "opposes the left" in circumstances where the truth does not sufficiently demonize the subject which the speaker needs to imply but cannot defend. It's a disgusting slander.
For example calling your enemies fascist isn't bad because it's "divisive", it's bad because the claim is wrong. But if you cannot claim something is wrong because the claim is a value judgement which effectively admits you're a leftist propagandizing your opinion rather than a journalist discussing reality you switch to "divisive" to hide this.
"...First because it's a weasel word which means it's non-specifically derogatory so the user does not have to defend the position..."
Or it simply means "he thinks I'm wrong", and in Kirk's case, you probably were and he was probably right.
'But there is also a disturbing strain emerging specifically on the left that makes light of political violence'
Could this be the same left that has declared the Enlightenment to be nothing but oppression, that objective truth is delusional, that all life is power struggle, and therefore any action to defeat "evil" is justified, that fundamental and universal principles do not apply (certainly to them), and double standards are what they say they are. That includes the claim that their violence is speech and our speech is violence.
"objective truth is delusional"
That is Robert Kennedy, not anyone from the mainstream left.
Right, asswipe:
"The relationship between the left and notions of objectivity and truth is a complicated and fraught relationship. Within the heterogeneous milieu that is leftist thought and practice, there are unresolved debates as to whether the left ought to embrace objectivity and truth, or abandon these notions as regressive enlightenment ideals which mask power and inequality."
https://alyesque.medium.com/the-leftist-case-for-objectivity-68422caeeda2
On CNN yesterday they tried a both sides by claiming that Obama, Hillary and Biden had multiple death threat. Crazy she left out the death threat toward both Bush's and Trump and all presidents and most politicians get death threats thats nothing new but hey had to make one side look equally bad.
"claiming that Obama, Hillary and Biden had multiple death threat."
How many bullets fired at them?
Everyone online gets death threats. Trump gets more, he got shot, and then almost shot again. And one of his biggest fundraisers and supporters assassinated. The "boaf sides" would be Obama getting shot in the ear and Rahm Emmanuel getting assassinated in broad daylight.
These things are in different universes
How many bullets fired at them?
Can Hillary count the sniper fire at that airfield in Bosnia?
"No, the rot is deeper, and it's not just left-on-right. There was that right-wing crazy who shot and killed several Minnesota state lawmakers in June, for example."
BOAF SIDES!!!!!!1!!
Also, attending and endorsing the anti-Trump No Kings rallies, working for a Democratic Party state elected official and hating on Trump all over your Facebook page now makes you almost as much of a "right-wing crazy" as donating to Act Blue.
SMH.
Looks like Liz does almost as much research as Boehm and Welch now.
Sarcles attempted a boaf sidez too in Robby’s obituary article.
"Trump wins again as John Roberts joins liberal justices in surprise Supreme Court dissent"
[...]
"The Supreme Court has cleared the way for the Trump administration to move forward with deep cuts to federal research funding tied to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, marking a significant shift in the government’s approach to scientific investment."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-wins-again-as-john-roberts-joins-liberal-justices-in-surprise-supreme-court-dissent/ss-AA1MiJIM?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=68c2230d14884adc8a55db3455448ce9&ei=19
Yeah, a 'shift' toward SCIENTIFIC investment and away from lefty bafflegab.
That's a poorly-worded title. It implies John Roberts joining the liberal justices is what got Trump his win. Now, obviously anyone who has even a cursory understanding of the justices would know that's not the case.
It should have read, "Trump wins again despite John Roberts joining the liberal justices in their dissent."
>>But there is also a disturbing strain emerging specifically on the left that makes light of political violence
children incapable of using their words will lash out.
>>And who, exactly, will want to speak freely in the aftermath, knowing that sort of violence is now on the menu?
there's always a next man up. Christianity took down Rome in a matter of years.
"But there is also a disturbing strain emerging specifically on the left"
Back in my campus anti-war days before I volunteered to serve in the US Army, I observed this disturbing strain in my Socialist Workers Party "Find out which way the masses are going and put yourself at the head of the movement" protest colleagues. Every one of them had this subliminal fantasy of themselves deposing the Tsar while waving red (or black) flags. The Trots notwithstanding, Matthew Dowd was probably correct that Charlie Kirk martyred himself. Dowd is being fired for "insensitivity" but isn't that what hard truth always ends up being? Political violence is never justified, but isn't that what the Civil War (remember "preserving the union" and "freeing the slaves") and World War Two (ending fascist imperialist conquest?) were all about? How can we make a convincing case against retail political violence when we are surrounded by it, having been subjected to the wholesale political violence message for decades? Maybe if our Fearless Leaders would stop trying to make the world safe for Democracy, making war on global terrorism and waging a never-ending war on drugs; and "protecting our vital national interests" all the time everywhere all at once, then the rhetoric might be toned down a bit and revolutionary wet dreams might stop provoking assassinations.
Matthew Dowd was probably correct that Charlie Kirk martyred himself.
What the actual fuck is wrong with you.
That asswipe is a TDS-addled lying pile of shit who does his best to hide it.
MSNBC was correct in firing Dowd for saying such stupid shit.
Well, I actually didn't see this coming, but way to remove the mask MWAodcoc. What a piece of shit you really are.
You usually do better than simple name-calling. Exactly what mask did I remove? Do you think our leaders can engage in constantly killing people around the world and here at home without consequences?
"emerging specifically on the left"
I regularly see MAGA commenters calling for death to trans people and to illegal immigrants.
Oh? Who?
I see a few people telling you to kill yourselves but that's a very different thing.
In that case, would it be violence against retards?
Cite missing for the voices in you head, asswipe.
Begone demon.
"Charlies' skirt was too short!"
MSNBC lefty asshole gets CANNED!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8mtmQc7vuM
Bu-bye, shitstain.
"We don't know if this was a supporter shooting their gun off as a celebration"
What an absolute piece of shit trying to start that brainless narrative.
Thanks for sharing the update on that.
There was that right-wing crazy who shot and killed several Minnesota state lawmakers in June, for example.
[averts eyes and shields brow] Hey, uh, libertarian journalist, you *do* know the critical difference between a
journalistpublic speaker and a lawmaker, right?lol had to post this at least twice now.
>>Today's the 24th anniversary of 9/11
seems different this year what with NYC surrendering to Islam and all ...
Kind of feels like Bin Laden won, doesn't it. Fucking tragic.
Once Bin Laden said he hated America and wanted to tear it down the American left welcomed him as a true ally.
Still no Sarc sighting. Weird, cuz he totes isn't on one side.
He was jumping on the death yesterday, outraged maga would be angry at the death.
He's concerned the emotion of the moment will cause him to slip up and accidentally reveal what he really thinks.
"...he really thinks..."
Pretty sure there is no danger of this happening.
“New Era” of political violence? Huh? The lunatic fringe has spent years demonizing Trump and those who walk in his shadow-including Kirk.
They’ve used the coded language of hate and fake moral leverage to transform anyone outside of their mindless tribe into being evil. And again we witness the consequences.
The only new era of political violence should be to line these bastards up against the wall. Followed by champagne and celebration.
Found out yesterday that my 15 year old son was a big fan of Charlie Kirk’s. I noticed the my son often wanted to discuss hot button topics recently and took a well-reasoned conservative position on them. I didn’t agree with him on everything , but if Charlie was able to inspire my son to argue more effectively and think critically, he did a great thing.
Yeah. He was getting pretty big down to middle schools here. Mentioned above. Daughter and her friends watched his debates often.
That's one of the primary reasons he was targeted.
How did your son react to the news? Horrible to have someone you were listening to respectfully murdered. I hope what he learned from Kirk will carry forward logically instead of emotionally.
America is one day removed from master debation and already things seem a little brighter and happier. Politics aren’t really allowed in my jujitsu class, but you get a feel for people’s leanings and I’ll just say things were decidedly upbeat.
KAR, cut the shit and have the balls to post under your original moniker.
KAR has no balls. He’s a below average urban urchin barely making ends meet. Emotionally stunted and low self-esteem, more pathetic than anything else.
Quit sockpuppeting ragebait under Sandra's nick, KAR. You can't even spell her name correctly.
my jujitsu class
You volunteer as a grappling dummy?
No mention of the assassination of Melissa Hortman or the attempted assassination of Josh Shapiro and his family -- on Passover!
As two more examples of crazy lefties committing political violence?
1. The Hortman shooting was referenced in the above article. We discussed it several times in the comments.
2. The crazy (and off his meds) bipolar guy who set fire to the Penn Governor's Mansion stated his motivation was, 'based on "perceived injustices toward the people of Palestine"'. Not a right-wing motivation, certainly.
Boelter was a Walz appointee who supported the No Kings anti-Trump movement and a "Free Palestine" and in the letter he left for police said that Governor Walz instructed him to kill multiple officials, especially Klobuchar, to allow Walz to run for her Senate seat.
But somehow you guys managed to turn him into a right-wing Trump supporter because a neighbor told the newspaper he was.
This is as bad as when they claimed potential Trump assassin and ActBlue donor was MAGA. The lack of shame you guys have is amazing.
Charlie is the village idiot in retardville.
A village somewhere is missing its idiot.
Matthew Dowd now has more free time where he could fill that role.
Dowd is a Bush Republican like many others at MSGOPe. Bush Republicans are the same people that orchestrated the coup to overthrow Trump and install Pence as president.
Wasn't his neighbor some fat drunk that lived miles away also? Remember that being part of ot.
Nope, he was a good Christian anti-abortion activist. Crooks was a bitter clinger MAGA Republican. The George Floyd violence was instigated by a false flag operation orchestrated by a Trump supporting white supremacist.
*This does*? But not 2020?
Politics revolves around the use of force to enforce law. What is surprising is how little violence occurs.
Worse, politics revolves around the use of force to enforce very bad laws. Enforcement of very bad laws revolves around violation of their own rules of engagement without penalty.
Cancel culture. You can’t even talk about what a shit Charlie Kirk was without SJWs coming after you online.
https://www.indiatimes.com/amp/trending/gofundme-for-charlie-kirks-shooter-netizens-track-down-nurse-firefighter-teacher-and-others-celebrating-influencers-assassination-669779.html
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
If you're going to try and spoof someone, at least make the attempt to be believable.
But wait -- Robby Soave assured us in his post about the Kirk assassination last night that political violence is still rare in the US. Is it possible that he is completely wrong and Liz is completely right?
Yes. No! Maybe?
This says it all:
https://x.com/Black_Pilled/status/1965880897548485042
Nobody had heard of this guy until he was killed, and now he’s a religious martyr for the Church of Trump. I wonder if his family appreciates his canonization. I suppose they will appreciate the payout when their religious leader gives them a few million dollars, like he did for the family of Saint Babbitt.
"Nobody had heard of this guy until he was killed"
You spend this much time on political forums and hadnt heard of Charlie Kirk?
I believe school shootings are now copycats and so I advocate not publicizing them. I said the same thing could happen after the bitter clinger MAGA Republican shot Trump and his supporters because even though Crooks was a registered Republican his profile was that of a school shooter attempting to go out in a blaze of glory in his demented mind.
"...even though Crooks was a registered Republican..."
I'm certain you're a slimy pile of lying TDS-addled lefty shit entirely too fucking stupid to know what "false flag" is.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
So you got around your ban, Kirkland?
don't feed the trolls.
This troll chow is delicious!!! 😉
Now you rear your head, Sarc, when you think it’s safe to enter the water? Go fuck yourself.
Didn't South Park do an episode on him, faggot?
You are not welcome
On the direction of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, the US State Department will ban any foreigner who celebrated the assassination of Charlie Kirk online from entering the US.
- Bellum Acta
I agree, Crooks was a bitter clinger MAGA Republican and Kash Patel still hasn’t told us anymore about his motive. Plus the George Floyd violence was instigated by a Trump supporting white supremacist orchestrating a false flag operation. That said, everyone is responsible for their own actions even if the initial spark is from a false flag!
I'm certain you're a slimy pile of lying TDS-addled lefty shit entirely too fucking stupid to know what "false flag" is.
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
Crooks was a Republican but his assassination attempt wasn’t political violence….he was nutz and he was suicidal.
Fuck off, Kirkland.
"Today's the 24th anniversary of 9/11"
I lost a cousin on that day who worked in the Towers. Please light a candle in honor of him for me, Liz.
Has REEEason gone completely insane?
Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch discuss Charlie Kirk’s murder and rising violence in U.S. politics today at 2:30 p.m. ET.
Who the fuck wants to hear "Red Wedding" bitch talk about Charlie Kirk or political violence? Fire Welch, preferably out of a cannon, into a woodchipper.
Fuck REEason.
+1
kmw@reason.com
Ask for Welch to be relieved of his employment for promoting political violence. Cite his social media post:
https://x.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12
Re: Strange bedfellows
I’m becoming a fan of the Proud Boys founder, Gavin McInnes. I quote:
Violence doesn't feel good, justified violence feels great, and fighting solves everything... I want violence. I want punching in the face
Violence is good in very carefully controlled doses of which yesterday was a good example. Body count: 1. Insufferable fascist asshat wasted: 1. As Orwell said once: Doubleplusgood.
You are fucking insane. Killing a person because you don't like the sounds coming out of his mouth. Do you really want to live in that world?
His world is miserable because he is a loser and has to live with himself 24/7. If people better than him are eliminated, he might feel some sort of gain. But alas, he’ll always be a loser.
^^^ reported.
Predictions: Will the new deplatforming consist of colleges claiming that security for conservative speakers is just too darn expensive? Look for ways this might get twisted into a means of controlling right-leaning speech.
I am a bit of a heretic on this subject.
To get one thing out of the way first, security logistics and costs have already been used as an excuse to block not only right-leaning events, but 'right-coded*' events and speakers. This has been going on for probably more than 5 years if not longer.
*right-coded is a term that is sometimes used which applies to nominally left-wing people, activists (often feminists, especially in the so-called TERF lane) who, from the outside, fit most left-leaning descriptions, but have come out swinging against wokeness, trans ideology (but I repeat myself), racialized politics etc. These speakers are sometimes referred to as having 'right-coded' ideas.
Anyway, on with my comment. Several years ago when various people I follow had events canceled by venues and the excuse was "we can't provide the security/it's too expensive etc" there was a twinkle in the back of my brain that made me think this wasn't a handwave or an excuse, but was a legitimate concern. Then over time, I began to seriously suspect it to be true-- all the while the people being de-platformed or having their events canceled continued to suggest it was just a weak-tea excuse. And now with the Kirk assassination, I absolutely believe it to be true.
The very people who would have their events canceled by the venue would, in the next breath, talk about how many death threats they got on the regular. In the case of the 'gender critical' feminists, you can only imagine the amount of violent threats they got from Girl Bulliers, also known as the Trans Movement. You can only imagine that if you were a venue manager or owner, and you started getting real threats of violence, bombings, mass shootings, firebombs, that you'd be well within reason to say, "These leftoids are fucking dangerous, no way I'm hosting this."
America is full of guns…you are never safe. But I assume everyone is armed and behave accordingly. In fact Biden got the murder rate so low after the Trump spike in violence that now it’s mostly alcohol plus domestic violence plus guns and thus not really preventable.
it’s mostly alcohol plus domestic violence
Leave sarc alone.
Why are people acting like the ONLY thing that Charlie Kirk did was to debate college kids? He was ALSO a political operative. He worked directly with the Trump campaign. He visited the White House several times. He was the leader of a political organization which is very much on Team Red. And, let's be honest, he also defended some very terrible ideas, such as the idea that school shootings are justified in order to keep the Second Amendment.
He should not have been murdered for any reason, let alone for debating college kids. But let's also be honest about who he was.
He was the leader of a political organization which is very much on Team Red.
This is his real crime, eh?
"And he worked for Trump? Is it too late to shoot him again?" - The Left, currently.
There is a difference between murdering someone because he presents ideas you don't like, and murdering someone because he is working for the other team. They are both wrong, but they are wrong on different levels.
he also defended some very terrible ideas, such as the idea that school shootings are justified in order to keep the Second Amendment.
In general left wingers are incapable of accurately analyzing everything because their ideology is defeated if they do so accurately. Here we see Jeffey is no exception to that rule.
It's idiotically wrong to say Kirk believed school shootings were justified.
It's idiotically wrong to say Kirk believed school shootings were justified.
What Charlie Kirk said:
“It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”
So is your point of contention that he didn't specifically say "school shootings"? You're right, he didn't. He was defending all categories of gun deaths, *including* school shootings.
You would think a libertarian would agree with kirk about 2A...
Why are people acting like the ONLY thing that Charlie Kirk did was to debate college kids? He was ALSO a political operative.
Definitely deserving of an assassin's bullet...
me very terrible ideas, such as the idea that school shootings are justified in order to keep the Second Amendment.
I never really followed Charlie Kirk, but this very much smells like he probably made the same argument that free speech advocates make-- that if we're going to have free speech, we're going to have to hear some really awful stuff-- ie, if we're going to have the 2nd amendment where people can freely buy firearms, occasionally, some nutcase is gonna pop off and kill some kids.
It's the age-old argument about accepting a certain amount of risk to maintain the freedoms you have.
I wrote:
He should not have been murdered for any reason
I will accept your apology now.
What Charlie Kirk said:
“It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”
We tolerate alcohol-related deaths at 2.5 times the number of total firearm-related deaths because the cost of Prohibition wasn't worth it.
You're not making the case you think you are.
We ALSO have all sorts of rules and restrictions on the sale and consumption of alcohol *because* of the social harm that its abuse can lead to.
And let's just be real honest. Every nation on earth has "gun deaths", but most do not have a Second Amendment-type of statement in their constitutions. What makes America unique is not the presence of gun deaths, but the *gun culture* that the current interpretation of the Second Amendment promotes. This gun culture prohibits or hobbles many of the types of rules and restrictions that we ordinarily tolerate on other substances and practices that lead to social harm, like alcohol consumption, like driving. The gun culture is the actual problem which leads to the abnormally high gun violence rates in the US compared to other nations.
The right to own a gun is fine. The Second Amendment itself is fine. The mythology and culture that has grown up around the Second Amendment is generally toxic and a problem.
When an innocent person is assassinated (in a particularly horrible way) and you don't like their opinions, you don't open with, "Hang on, let's not forget how bad their ideas were". That's how you open a discussion about a police shooting that on the surface appears to be unjustified.
“It’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment.”
So it's exactly as I suggested. Actually, no, it's not even as bad as I suggested, and not within the solar system of what you suggested.
When an innocent person is assassinated (in a particularly horrible way) and you don't like their opinions, you don't open with, "Hang on, let's not forget how bad their ideas were". That's how you open a discussion about a police shooting that on the surface appears to be unjustified.
Pretty much puts a lie to the fork-tongued assertion that politics should be about a give and take between ideas, doesn't it? Kirk took them at their word and he was killed for it. And it notably happened after the right started getting Ws in the culture war, after a 30-plus year stretch of the left pushing the Overton window.
Why are people acting like the ONLY thing that Charlie Kirk did was to debate college kids? He was ALSO a political operative.
Which is immaterial. Someone whose political activity centered around going to the most left-wing institutions in the country and debating kids who went there, doesn't make him a sinister figure like you're implying.
This is like your defense of officials at Oberlin who helped college students try to get Gibson's Bakery shut down, because the owners had the temerity to not want to be robbed. Whatever puts your lefty boos in a bad light immediately has to be redirected.
https://www.charliesmurderers.com/
I wonder if Sam is on here yet.