Trump Keeps Casting Himself as the Bad Guy
From Apocalypse Now memes to a re-named War Department, the second Trump administration is in love with authoritarian aesthetics.

President Donald Trump surely succeeded in his aim of riling up the libs when he posted a meme of himself as Lt. Col. Kilgore from Apocalypse Now dropping napalm on Chicago.
"I love the smell of deportations in the morning. Chicago is about to find out why it's called the Department of War," reads the text of the Truth Social post. The White House X account promptly reposted the meme with a few helicopter emojis.
???????????? pic.twitter.com/6LSUCBcDQK
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) September 6, 2025
As a politician—and as an entertainer before that—Trump has always made liberal use of provocation. Getting his political enemies angry and fearful is something he clearly enjoys and has a talent for.
Even by his standards, tweeting out a meme of himself as a military officer burning America's third-largest city to the ground and implying he'll use the military to deport the survivors is a dark escalation of tone and rhetoric.
Anyone who's seen Apocalypse Now will know that Lt. Col. Kilgore is not supposed to be a heroic character. The name alone (a play on "kill" and "gore") should make that clear.
And while the Ride of the Valkyries scene is admittedly awesome, its point in the film is to show that Kilgore's gung-ho warrior spirit ultimately brings just senseless killing and violence.
I doubt the president missed this point. More likely, he and his staff absorbed the point and are reveling in it.
The meme is part of a trend. In his second term, Trump and his communications staff keep depicting the president as the bad guy doing bad things.
To take a slightly less bloodthirsty example, people might recall that on this past May 4—the informal Star Wars holiday—the White House posted an image of Trump as a jacked red lightsaber-wielding Sith lord.
There are plenty of heroic good guys in the Star Wars universe that the White House could have depicted Trump as. They opted for the villain role instead.
The Trump team continues to not only post pop culture memes, but to depict their boss as the villain. pic.twitter.com/7XQXIYmR30
— Joe Lancaster (@JoeRLancaster) May 4, 2025
The Biden administration dabbled in this, too, with its embrace of the "dark Brandon" meme, albeit in a much more half-hearted and pathetic way. That wasn't very successful: Try as they might, there was just no amount of memeing that was going to make Joe Biden appear intimidating and badass.
Conservatives were nevertheless right to describe that effort as "creepy."
This White House has been much more successful at depicting its president as a dark figure, and the result—whether or not conservatives want to say so—is a lot creepier.
This is the motivating factor behind the administration's decision to rebrand the Department of Defense as the Department of War.
There was always a healthy degree of hypocrisy and Orwellian obfuscation in calling the federal government's war machine the Department of Defense. Changing the name to the "Department of War" at least makes clear what its actual job is.
But the Trump administration isn't trying to change the Department of Defense's name because it thinks it's dishonest. They're changing the name because they think sticking to defending Americans would be a bad thing.
As Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth put it at the signing ceremony informally renaming the department, "We're going to go on offense, not just defense. Maximum lethality, not tepid legality."
"This name change is not just about renaming, it's about restoring… America First, peace through strength brought to you by the WAR DEPARTMENT." - @SecWar Pete Hegseth
???????????????????????????????? pic.twitter.com/dcUKZLTHYN
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) September 6, 2025
One might dismiss these examples as silly memes and canned pablum, but the administration keep casting itself as the villain in real life as well.
These past few months, Trump has taken particular delight in sending masked federal agents and uniformed troops to patrol the streets of Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
When a drunk threw a sandwich at one of these officers in D.C., the White House posted a video on social media of masked, armed federal agents showing up at his apartment at night to rearrest him.
???? Nighttime Routine: Operation Make D.C. Safe Again Edition pic.twitter.com/ngZsbgBpcz
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 14, 2025
The administration likes the theater of armed, uniformed men marching around looking intimidating. They want the public to see the federal government as threatening and capable of exercising force at a moment's notice.
You might hope that stripping away the euphemisms means the administration is taking the government's war-making powers more seriously. Instead, it's taking them less seriously.
That's where the memes come in.
The administration is being quite explicit that not only does it see state violence and intimidation as a good thing, but also that it's willing to exercise that violence in a casual and trollish manner.
Reason's Matthew Petti wrote last week about how Trump's decision to blow up a boat of suspected Venezuelan drug smugglers was the last nail in the coffin of any real legal limits on the president's use of military force.
The memes of Col. Kilgore Trump signal this administration doesn't accept any tonal limits on its use of military force either.
As Vice President J.D. Vance declared on X, in response to someone saying that killing suspected criminals without due process was a war crime, "I don't give a shit what you call it."
I don't give a shit what you call it
— JD Vance (@JDVance) September 6, 2025
If the Trump administration doesn't give a shit about legal rights, you can be sure they don't give a shit about freedom either. They see themselves as the bad guys, and they're happy about that.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It should be the War Department…except when a neocon or Team D member gets elected then it could be called the Military Adventurism Department.
At this point, I can guess who posted the first comment on an article.
Have right-wing dead ends of evolution ceased to have a life and interactions offline? That would seem to be customary, given how obsolete, stationary and stale they are. A combination of low health, inability to compete and being rejected by better Americans likely dictates your routine at this point. And that's delightful and just how it should be.
In which 5.56 pretends that ethos is evolutionary in origin and drastically changes by the decade.
Two moron points for the price of one.
Can even change drastically by the half decade. Check European history around 1930 to 1945.
Nice try, replaceable. 😉
As he replies online within 2 minutes……
You mean the byodb guy? Yeah, like i said, being old, white and obese probably causes you to live more stationary
Yes, vermin, we realize how much your side hates white people.
I’m surprised he hasn’t stroked out yet. You can practically see the forehead vein popping out through the damn screen.
That's a projection. Do some soul searching and try to find out what makes you angry about my comments. It's likely that being obese, bitter, right-wing and uncompetitive keeps you from enjoying the sweet fruits of a modern society, reserved for better americans.
Micropenis is sour because the only fruits he gets are rotten.
LOL, tell us some more about how "billionaires" are the enemy while peacocking your social status.
You’ll have to ask some “right-wing” dead ends of evolution, whatever that means. Keep crying like a baby. It is mildly funny.
Right wingers are the types of ethical deplorables that would think crying babies are "mildly funny". You are not telling us anything new and we see you.
Left-wingers are the types of slack-jawed wastes of carbon molecules that would think a catchphrase like "we see you" means anything.
There was always a healthy degree of hypocrisy and Orwellian obfuscation in calling the federal government's war machine the Department of Defense. Changing the name to the "Department of War" at least makes clear what its actual job is.
The problem is framing. Having a super-powerful military there will always be an urge to use it and engage in endless military adventurism that will occasionally backfire, perhaps disastrously.
Calling it "defense" emphasizes that the primary role should be defensive in nature. It's not a strong constraint, but it is a statement of purpose in the right direction.
"You can fool some of the people all of the time, or all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time."
Calling the department that oversaw wars that weren't called wars since World War 2 the 'Department of Defense' was always bullshit. It might make Americans feel better about our endless wars, but in no way has it ever served as any kind of statement of purpose.
Recall that Vietnam, one of the most disastrous 'wars' in American history, was fought by...the Department of Defense.
Yes, renaming it is stupid and does nothing at all but so too is arguing that it should remain the Department of Defense. It will do the same things it's always done, and maybe people will remember what the hell they actually do if it has 'War' right there in the name.
Just because it entered into ill-conceived wars as the Department of Defense doesn't mean it wouldn't have entered into even more ill-conceived wars if it was the Department of War.
It's like the obsession with US military (and even police) as branding themselves as "warriors". You don't want a blood-thirsty glory seeking warriors, you want soldiers who are professionals who work as a team.
Emphasize the soldier aspect over the warrior and you might have an easier time maintaining discipline.
the second Trump administration is in love with authoritarian aesthetics.
That's because he is an authoritarian. And his defenders love it!
Cite? Use actual examples and not Maddow narratives.
If you are so out of it that you don't know, there is no hope for you.
How so, Tony? How is he "out of it", you bug-chasing retard?
Cite? Use actual examples and not Maddow narratives.
PWNED!
wtf is a "Maddow narrative"? You mean what's really going on outside? What shall we pick. Is it the masked goon squads prowling Home Depot parking lots and the national mall looking to black van people to various gulags (foreign and domestic)? Is it the open extortion of American businesses using the power of the state to hustle for straight up undisguised protection money? Or perhaps its his transformation of US foreign policy into playing Putin's gimp.
"wtf is a "Maddow narrative"?"
You just did it. You called deporting criminals illegally in the country "masked goon squads prowling Home Depot parking lots and the national mall looking to black van people to various gulags (foreign and domestic)?"
Fuck. That was about as clear a Maddow narrative as anyone could ask for. Four smears in just one sentence. A thing of beauty.
But you didn't stop there. You smeared reciprocal tariffs against existing tariffs on that US as, "open extortion of American businesses using the power of the state to hustle for straight up undisguised protection money".
And then you declaimed the fact that the US was no longer funding someone else's war as "his transformation of US foreign policy into playing Putin's gimp".
You my friend are a Maddow narrative factory.
Wow man, you’ve got it bad. Hilarious.
Hey dumdum, there is a SCOTUS ruling. Kavanaugh wrote a pretty clear analysis of why youre ignorant about the topic.
You screaming authoritarian is not an argument. Sorry buddy. Maybe try educating yourself.
What "gulag"? Do you historically ignorant leftists really not understand what happened under Stalin's regime?
Oh, they know.
Go fuck yourself with Britschigi's dink, you barely legible DNC chatbot.
When was the last time that the Department of "Defense" did anything that was actually defensive? I can't recall. But I do recall plenty of times when it went to war.
The whole point of calling the Department of War by it's old name instead of a mealy mouth weasel word like "Defense" is to ensure that people recognize that your "nation building" and "humanitarian interventions" for what they really are, Sarckles: War.
There will be no disguising war with defense anymore, you drunken fascist fuck.
I suppose the ICBM defense systems might count, and I'm sure there are other examples that don't spring readily to mind, but those are far overshadowed by little things like Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, the Iraq War, Afghanistan, and...well...you get the picture.
The department does horrible shit no matter what they are named, and at least Department of War is more accurate even if the name change is entirely idiotic since no actual changes in how it operates will result from it.
The MIC likes to pretend that 'defense' means 'preemptive war' which is just absurd. I can admit that a first strike could be defensive from a certain point of view, but it just about never is in reality. Especially not the way the United States has done it, with covert CIA operations to enact regime change and all the rest.
Gotta admit, the guy is good at this.
"Bad times don't last, but Bad Guys do."
--Donald "Razor Ramon" Trump, probably.
I'm actually surprised how full of beans this iteration of a GOP presidency is. No mealy-mouthing, no euphemisms, no high-handed glittering generalities. Just "here's what we're planning, go fuck yourself if you don't like it, this is what the people who voted for us wanted."
Trump being arguably the greatest troll ever is essentially playing against being the bad guy because no matter what he does, and especially the good he has and is doing, will always be painted in a bad light by the democrats.
Had he posted a meme with Trump as a knight in shining armor entering Chicago with white knights the media and democrats would have called him out as racist and White Supremacist.
No matter what he can't win in the eyes of the democrats or the media and really it is better for him to stay light hearted and through humor show himself as the bad guy he is constantly accused of being because otherwise the backlash would be tremendous.
What good has Trump done? The only think I can think of is not sabotaging the development and rollout of the covid vaccine.
Ironically that was one of the worse things he did. Par for the course for a neo-Nazi interventionist like you, I suppose, Tony.
It is hilarious that the MAGAs hate the one good thing Trump did.
Forcing parents to give kids at no risk a shot that has a decent incidence of myocarditis is not good. Wait. That was Biden.
But that is (D)ifferent.
He is the President of the United States. NOT POSTING CHILDISH MEMES is an option. Nobody is making him embarrass his office and our country.
What the fuck? Trump thinks its a joke because he is a clown. His cabinet and everybody around him can't control him and think they are owning some imaginary libs?? They are self-owning themselves as not-serious assholes with a cruelty fetish. Pete Hegseth spends more on makeup than I do on my mortgage. MAXIMUM LETHALITY NOT LEGALITY hurrr durrrrr. Idiocracy was not supposed to be a guide.
WE MUST RESPECT THE OFFICE!
Idiocracy was 1/20/21 thru 1/20/25. A collection of retards running the country on behalf of a vegetable.
Trump has ended 6-7 wars...so far. Nobody has close to that pedigree.
Ha. Ha ha. Ha ha ha. Ha ha ha ha. Ha ha ha ha ha. U iz 1 funnee girl!!!!
Know what they call stupid people who aren't intelligent enough to know their stupid. EdG is one term. Know the other?
oh, that's hilarious. Trump and his foul mouth lap dog Vance openly embrace the title of war criminal. this is what we've become. We're done as a country. I'm glad I'm too old to have to watch this horror much longer.
What's really hilarious is your belief anyone takes an invertebrate clown like you seriously. Get fucked.
Another Maddow watcher lol.
Someone with retards running the state like Newsom's pet Lujan-Grisham really aren't in a position to be complaining about how stupid their opponents are.
Trump and his foul mouth lap dog Vance
LOL. "Democrats can drop f-bombs on Twitter and it's funny, but an embarrassment when Republicans do it." What lunacy.
PWNED!
Right. Juvenile, unserious, unworthy of any high office anywhere, any time. At least the villainous self-portrayals are honest. He is loathsome from every possible perspective, but wants to be seen as even nastier. Gratuitously nasty. Nasty for its own sake. Violently invading Chicago as a demonstration to the mayor and the governor and their voters that they have angered the vindictive dictator, who directs national resources against his own country for personal vengeance.
Why cant you all just bend the knee to democrats and their captured media. Done with your games dumdum.
He does it to make losers like yourself cry.
Non leftists are tired of this fake civility shit from you retards while you riot, cancel, censor, etc.
Games are over. Stop being a small man who cant stand someone not punching back.
If a meme of him armwrestling the devil gets posted, it's evil iconography.
If he stands in front of a historical Church with a Bible in his hands and says it's awful that people would desecrate our nation's history like this, he's blasphemously pandering.
If he presents himself as a mad titan, he's embracing his villainy and openly flaunting your social expectations of how a President should behave.
No matter what he does, he and JD Vance are wrong, got it.
It's a pointed exploitation of your own stupid moral relativism that you're either too apoplectic to pick up on or too bought-and-sold against to comprehend.
Now, can we get back to something like all the AfD party members who are dropping dead, the people killed by Palestinian gunmen, Milei's loss... anything besides your goddamned TDS?
Trump is almost always wrong because he is legitimately wrong. And of course normal Americans will see every fascist move of his as being wrong. That is not a sign that the anti-Trump people are partisan, but it is a sign that Trump is a fascist.
The thing is that you are so grotesquely evil you couldn't tell wrong from right if it teabagged you. The only time you seem to sense goodness is when it gives you the hives, and the very presence of decency gives you blisters. To you, morality isn’t a compass—it’s an allergy.
That's why you could sit in glee with your hands down your pants as people got fired from their jobs for refusing a garbage placebo that only did damage and offered zero protection.
That's why you could chortle as the government censored people for posting things like Covid came from a lab and not a Chinese farmer's market.
That's why you danced like a maniac when the opposition candidate was banned from the internet, and taken off the ballot, and charged with phoney crimes, and shot.
Fucking Nazi.
Molly got hard from the teabag reference.
Trump: live-streams a porn shoot from the Lincoln Bedroom, featuring himself, Melania, and several members of his cabinet.
MAGA folks: "Oh, you libtards and your TDS...they could have been having a Bible study, and you'd have said they're plotting to repeal the Establishment Clause. There's just no pleasing you people."
As for "TDS": can you grasp the possibility that criticism of Donald Trump could arise from something other than "derangement"?
“can you grasp the possibility that criticism of Donald Trump could arise from something other than "derangement"?”
After starting with:
“Trump: live-streams a porn shoot from the Lincoln Bedroom, featuring himself, Melania, and several members of his cabinet.”
Self awareness is not your strong point.
Liberal retard imagines a scenario because he cant make an intelligent argument. News at 11.
Birdbrain, why are you recasting the Democrat aide having sex in Congress and you degenerate fucks defending him? Maybe stick to reality, if you can find your way back to it.
“As for "TDS": can you grasp the possibility that criticism of Donald Trump could arise from something other than "derangement"?”
When it’s a logical complaint that’s not filled with hyperbolic over-emotionalism, sure. It’s not like most people here haven’t criticized him at one time or another.
Reason's Matthew Petti wrote last week about how Trump's decision to blow up a boat of suspected Venezuelan drug smugglers was the last nail in the coffin of any real legal limits on the president's use of military force.
Just so we're clear, the 'last nail' wasn't when Obama authorized an air strike to take out a U.S. citizen?
(D)IFFERENT.
I find it amusing they keep saying suspected despite the information that has been released.
You know fisherman often fish in the dark with skiffs containing 4 20k outboard motors while throwing packages into the ocean when spotted.
I always fish going 100mph.
I would prefer this child president simply present himself as an adult who's maturity level doesn't vacillate between toddler and frat boy. Is it too much to ask the Republicans nominate an adult next time?
I take it you haven't seen what any of the Democrats in Congress or the Senate have said lately. If you think MTG is an idiot, boy do they give her a run for her money.
No! NOO!! We can't have standards! Let me remind you how every bad thing about THEM! You must constantly be afraid of THEM! Our Guy might not be able to tie his own shoes but he's so much better than THEM. If you pay any attention to OUR GUY's faults that's just helping THEM win.
You only have standards for your enemies retard. Lol. Done playing this game dummy.
Republicans had fucking standards. That’s how we got assholes like W Bush not fighting back against Democrats and their media sycophants calling him a Nazi. Or Joe Biden saying Mitt Romney would put people back in chains and him just rolling over like a little bitch.
And you can guarangoddamntee that if Johnson, Jorgensen, or Oliver had posed any real threat to the Democrats, they wouldn’t have hesitated to do the same to them.
"I would prefer this child president simply present himself as an adult who's maturity level doesn't vacillate between toddler and frat boy."
I would prefer a president who wasn't a senile pedophile with a taste in peddling influence for Chinese cash. And after four long years we got one.
If the 'elder statesman' act got you in to this, of what use is it?
>>the second Trump administration is in love with authoritarian aesthetics.
T is a skankhunt42-level troll and your type can't handle it.
"Peace through strength" is a message that means one thing only:
"We'll give you peace and prosperity after you give us power that you won't be able to take back."
What power is the world going to give us?
If TdA is a designated terror organization and that terror organization was launching an attack on the US as determined by the executive branch who has more intel than we're allowed to see, the president has the constitutional authority to repel attacks against the US, its territories and possessions.
Yeah, just trust them with the power to kill whoever they want, whenever they want. I'm sure that won't turn out badly.
It's what both sides told us for Iraq and Afghanistan - once Obama was in office anyway.
"authoritarian aesthetics?"
It's more properly called fascist politicking, Beta MAGA males love that shit.
I think you mean socrealism, but then again you don't seem like the type of person that knows much about art.
Not that the author of this piece does either since they're posting meme's, which tells you exactly how serious this article is.
And for what it's worth, I quite like the socrealism style...just not what it represents.
Not that the author of this piece does either since they're posting meme's, which tells you exactly how serious this article is.
The article starts by noting how Trump posted a meme about himself, AI'd deepfaked over Robert Duvall's face in Apocalypse Now.
I guess that tells us exactly how serious our President is. Oh, wait, everyone already knew that...
Act blue midt have gotten a surge in donations.
Must have found one of the last USAID pallets of cash recently.
Fucking conservatives, amiright?
Trump's decision to blow up a boat of suspected Venezuelan drug smugglers
It wasn't suspected. They were confirmed long before the order was given.
Trump has taken particular delight in sending masked federal agents and uniformed troops to patrol the streets of Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
The rest of America has delighted in it too. At least, the normals did.
If the Trump administration doesn't give a shit about legal rights, you can be sure they don't give a shit about freedom either.
Don't pretend like you give a rip about freedom either. Because the "freedom" you're defending is for narcoterrorists to flood this nation with poison while importing millions of criminals to facilitate its trafficking, rape/murder our citizens, and turn swaths of America into the same godforsaken hellscape they live in down in Cartel Land.
Pigs like you only care about the "rights" of people who have zero respect for the concept in the first place; of those whose only goal is to deprive us of ours. You're applying Ivory Tower first world egalitarianism to inferior dumpster cultures and pretending that they'll all just get and appreciate it while they stomp all over the faces of everyone around you.
Screw that and screw you.
Progressivism is dead, Christian. And it's got an orange jerk pissing on its grave. It's what you asked for, and it's what you deserve.
One might dismiss these examples as silly memes and canned pablum, but the administration keep casting itself as the villain in real life as well.
Wrong. Your argument is that Trump is assuming the role of Zod when he should be trying to be Superman. What you fail to realize is that Trump realizes that Superman is the wrong hero for the job that America's currently facing. America isn't Metropolis. It might have been once, but those days are long past.
Now it's Gotham. And Gotham needs Batman. Who will not think twice about - let alone apologize for - using extreme violence and putting the fear of God into every cowardly and superstitious criminal he can. Everyone from the petty criminal, to the street gangs, to the supervillains. And he'll do it with every tool at his disposal knowing that he's always at a disadvantage compared to folks like Supes.
And to pull the metaphor into reality, let me put it very plainly that I have ZERO QUALMS ANYMORE about gathering up illegals, drug peddlers, LGBT pedos, AWFL Karens, and any other scum-sucking viruses to American society, and then dangling them off the roof of a tall building to scream for mercy, until dropping them with a line that pulls taught about 3' off the pavement for the cops to go round up and throw in a cell forever.
Screw them. They forsook their rights when they tried to weaponize them against us. Screw. Them.
Not the hero we deserve, but the hero we need right now.
Trump is Batman!
What did Biden do and why was he not considered 'casting himself as the bad guy's with 'authoritarian aesthetics'?
At least you didn't say 'coded'.
"And while the Ride of the Valkyries scene is admittedly awesome, its point in the film is to show that Kilgore's gung-ho warrior spirit ultimately brings just senseless killing and violence."
Somehow, when it is Leftist propaganda, authors do not experience "death".
Is the Navy going to get its own Cabinet department again too?