Trump Says Tariffs Make Us Richer. So, Why Are Most Countries With High Tariffs So Poor?
The U.S. is risking its liberty and its prosperity with such high tariffs.

After an appeals court slapped down President Donald Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose high tariffs without congressional authorization, he complained that if the import taxes go away, the U.S. will become a "third-world nation." That would be quite a trick. Despite the president's repeated claims that high tariffs produce greater national wealth, most countries that adopt them are very poor, while those that keep trade barriers low are wealthier. Third world status might be in America's future, but it's more likely to result from tariffs rather than from their absence.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Courtroom Tariff Tussle
As Reason's Jacob Sullum noted earlier this week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a unanimous ruling by the Court of International Trade that Trump exceeded his authority when he relied on IEEPA to unilaterally impose stiff import taxes. "Both courts noted that Trump's use of IEEPA, which does not mention tariffs at all, was unprecedented and involved an assertion of authority that implicated the 'major questions' doctrine, which aims to uphold the separation of powers," Sullum wrote.
The tariffs remain in place while the administration asks the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision. In his usual style, the president didn't just file an appeal, he also fulminated about his loss in court.
"More than 15 Trillion Dollars will be invested in the USA, a RECORD," he posted on Truth Social. "Much of this investment is because of Tariffs. If a Radical Left Court is allowed to terminate these Tariffs, almost all of this investment, and much more, will be immediately cancelled! In many ways, we would become a Third World Nation, with no hope of GREATNESS again."
Trump has repeatedly linked tariffs to the country's wealth. At the Conservative Political Action Conference in February, he insisted the U.S. was at its wealthiest relative to the rest of the world "from 1870 to 1913. That was our richest because we collected tariffs from foreign countries that came in and took our jobs and took our money, took our everything, but they charged tariffs."
High-Tariff Countries Are Poor
But if tariffs are linked to prosperity, it's an inverse relationship, according to a recent report on America's declining economic freedom for Canada's Fraser Institute. The authors, Robert A. Lawson of Southern Methodist University and Fraser's own Matthew D. Mitchell, write: "High-tariff countries are generally low-income countries while low-tariff countries are generally high-income countries. In the high-tariff countries, average GDP per capita is just $9,703 per year," while "in low-tariff countries, it is $43,502 per year."
In 2023, the U.S. had an average tariff rate of 3.3 percent, which put us in the company of such countries as Singapore and Hong Kong (zero percent each), Brunei (0.5 percent), Israel (1.3 percent), New Zealand (1.9 percent), Australia (2.4 percent), and Iceland (3.3 percent). This year's tariff shift has been marked by wild fluctuations. But the average tariff rate on April 15 was 28 percent and is now around 19 percent. That puts the U.S. amongst the likes of Zimbabwe (18 percent), Chad (18.1 percent), Republic of the Congo (18.1 percent), Algeria (18.9 percent), and Egypt (19 percent).
At 28 percent, average U.S. tariffs were higher than those of Djibouti (20.9 percent) and Sudan (21.6 percent) and exceeded only by the Bahamas (32.5 percent).
The U.S. used to have the sort of tariff rates that correlate with prosperity. The Trump administration is now emulating the trade policies of what he has termed in the past "shithole countries."
Non-Tariff Barriers
In all honesty, Trump didn't start this slide and he hasn't been alone in eroding America's trade freedom or in dinging its overall economic liberty. As of 2022, the U.S. stood at 53rd out of 165 countries for freedom to trade in Fraser's Economic Freedom of the World (EFW) index, having fallen from eighth place in 1995. That fall wasn't because of tariffs, which were relatively low at that time. It was because of non-tariff barriers of the sort that Trump complains are imposed on Americans by other governments, but which the U.S. has adopted to its own detriment in recent decades.
"US trade freedom peaked in 1980 at 9.3 on the 10-point scale, began to slide for the next two decades, and then declined more precipitously in the last decade and a half," comment Lawson and Mitchell. "Much of this decline was driven by controls on the movement of capital and people. In particular, the US imposed steeper capital controls in 2009 and more stringent limits on the freedom of foreigners to visit in 2014."
That is, despite relatively low tariffs before 2025, the U.S. wasn't as wide open as many people—Trump included—believe. Lawson and Mitchell point out that "with the exception of China, every country Trump has singled out for treating America unfairly is more open to trade than the United States itself."
That's unfortunate, because free trade doesn't just correlate with current prosperity; as seen from the list of which countries have high tariff rates and which have low ones, it helps countries to become wealthier.
"Few propositions command as much consensus among professional economists as that open world trade increases economic growth and raises living standards," Harvard University economist Greg Mankiw wrote in 2006.
Declining Economic Freedom
Anything that stands in the way of trade—whether it's high tariffs, controls on the movement of people and capital, or other barriers to investment and exchange—deprives people of the freedom they need to start businesses, create jobs, and improve their lives. High U.S. tariffs have a further perverse effect in that they tax Americans, effectively filling government coffers by punishing our own people for seeking the goods they want beyond the border.
Eroding trade freedom reduces total economic freedom, of course. This year's higher tariffs are predicted by Lawson and Michell to bump the U.S. from 56th place to 76th place for trade freedom in the EFW index, and cause "the US's overall economic freedom rank to fall from 5th to 10th."
That will be a real tragedy. Economist Deirdre McCloskey observed in 2016 that the enrichment and growth in human flourishing of recent centuries can be attributed to "liberalism, in the free-market European sense." We've become wealthy from the freedom to trade domestically and across borders.
The U.S. risks third-world status as the president warns that danger lies in adopting the illiberal trade policies of countries that remain poor largely through their rulers' bad decisions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Thanks J.D. Tuccille for a most excellent article!
Morons will be here soon to write Their Deepest Thoughts, "refuting" what you wrote!
"JDT; dr."
Do SNOT let the morons get to you! Keep up the good work!
Ignorant MAGA cult slanders directed towards the author and supportive commenters in 3...2...1...
Get back into your corner.
SCOTUS will need to weigh in on this soon, if for no other reason than to slow the Reason ripples articles.
Because they don't have an old man fueled by Big Macs and Diet Coke?
TTTAAAARRRRIIIIIFFFFFSSSSS!
Because most countries are poor.
Next question.
Where else are low-income countries going to get revenue from?
"More than 15 Trillion Dollars will be invested in the USA, a RECORD
Shit, that's twice as much as last week. By this time next month, I'll be a billionaire too!
But seriously, um, yeah, other countries are poor because they're not the US (or don't have natural resources, or are third-world dicatorships), not because they have high tariffs.
If he continues to print money to pay for his War Department, Social Security, and Medicare, and to exempt his wealthy cronies from most potential taxes, we all will be billionaires. On paper. That is, nearly worthless paper currency. I saw some paper money denominated in billions and trillions when I was in Zimbabwe.
You realize what you just said describes Biden’s term far better, right? I know you’re stupid, but even you hav ego see that.
Nope, Biden was on track to have the deficit manageable by 2026. Clinton achieved a surplus and Obama achieved 3% deficit/GDP ratio and neither Bush nor Trump ever got the deficit to the levels they inherited.
Once again - nothing on perma trade deficit, the decline of manufacturing (which now includes strategic commodities dependence), or the reserve status of the dollar.
Why it's almost as if Reason has nothing significant to say other than tariffs and open borders.
The trade deficit is BECAUSE the US is wealthy and can afford to buy more stuff than other countries. Manufacturing is only 5% below its all time high. And the reserve status of the dollar is in danger BECAUSE of Trump's policies.
If the US isn't going to have a population decline we need a lot more immigration. Not less. That is true of every developed country. The only OECD member that is replacing itself and growing naturally is Israel. (Mexico is close.)
But our trading partners would be wealthy too if they let in more of our exports, right?
Countries like Japan and Korea aren’t some third world countries that can’t afford to buy American products. Lots of Koreans buy apple phones, not Samsung. These are highly protectionist nations that take measures to protect their domestic companies.
Korea sent a tariff delegation to tail Trump to Scotland to appease him and insist on us beef not entering their country. You can spin it all you want - trade practices with our allies has not been fair to America, even though we pay a ton for their security and practically keep their economy afloat.
Trade wars are a less than ideal way to address this. At this point, I don’t care. I won’t let the commies take over under the cover of no tariff economy. The dems are free to vote against trumps tariffs if they want and incur the wrath of unions, more win for us.
No. The trade deficit is because the US is the reserve currency. That REQUIRES a current account deficit (meaning the arithmetic combo of a deficit in trade goods and services) in order to supply the currency to the world. IOW - we export DOLLARS to the world. Not goods. Those dollars provide liquidity to everyone else who holds those dollars in reserve. That reserve currency status - over time - obliterates manufacturing precisely BECAUSE we can no longer export goods and import dollars over any length of time. As seen in Britain, the reserve issuer predecessor to the US - and understood by Keynes at Bretton Woods when he argued for the Bancor - not the dollar - as reserve currency. And by Robert Triffin when he more formally explained the 'dilemma' of being the reserve issuer.
You obviously don't know shit about manufacturing. You just need to head around the Rust Belt to see the ludicrousness of your assertion. If you knew shit about manufacturing, then you would understand why/how the D's lost the working class in fly-over country in favor of their coastal-based identity politics. And how Trump appealed to that demographic after decades of being shat on by D's and despite him being a completely fraud with no natural appeal to any blue-collar demographic.
Nor do you know shit about the reserve currency since Trump is only one in a long line of Prez's who have abused that status to instead further US interest.
This is a question a 4th grader would ask. Tucille is an idiot.
Trump is a massive idiot and has no idea how tariffs work.
Sue Tony. You’re a moronic raving faggot that doesn’t even grasp basic concepts and can’t keep a thought in your head, but Trump is the idiot.
We believe you Tony, we believe you.
Taxes pay for services, they have little to do with wealth creation. Doesn't matter what form the Taxes take. Heck, entire states are funded off sales taxes.
Besides, someone has to pay for all the social spending.
The overwhelming majority of US social spending is Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Everything else put together is small change by comparison.
Taxes disincentivize whatever they are taxing. To disincentivize imports is stupid because we need imports. That is why income taxes can be effective, no one is going to say "meh I won't bother making that $100k because I will have to pay tax on that". People always want more money.
I mean, most of these poor countries with high tariffs aren’t America, much less a functioning nation. Egypt has a high tariff for the same reason Korea is dead set against us beef entering their country.
Trump used tariff as leverage to secure investment deals and allow more exports. The guy probably saved like a gazillion dollars by deporting future mouths to feed at a time when AI is about to take over. In the grand scheme of things, it evens out.
Yeah, we all wish someone like Rand Paul was president. We don’t live in a perfect world. We’re not like most other countries, they need us more then we need them. Beating tariffs mean just buying something used at Amazon. I can’t beat the likes of mamdsni taking over.