American Manufacturing Needs Relief From Trump's Tariffs
Manufacturing has been in decline for six months, nearly the exact amount of time since Trump's new trade wars began.

The data are becoming impossible to ignore: American manufacturers desperately need relief from the very same tariffs that the Trump administration incoherently believes are helping American manufacturers.
That conclusion is evident from both results of a new survey of manufacturing companies' CEOs and new economic data showing that manufacturing activity has declined for six consecutive months—the sort of slide over two economic quarters that typically meets the definition of a sector-wide recession. In short, both words and actions point to something being very wrong with American manufacturing since February, which just so happens to be when Trump announced the first of what have become many rounds of new tariffs on imported goods and raw materials.
The economic data come courtesy of the Institute for Supply Management (ISM), which tracks a combination of factors including orders, employment, and inventories. A score higher than 50 in the monthly index indicates expansion, while a score below that threshold means contractions. For August, the ISM survey showed a score of 48.7, up from 48 in July.
Discussion of tariffs "continued to dominate commentary from manufacturers," Reuters reported, citing several of the anonymous comments submitted by manufacturing firm executives as part of the ISM survey. "This is 100 percent attributable to current tariff policy and the uncertainty it has created," reads one such comment. Another called the current economic conditions "much worse than the Great Recession."
Meanwhile, a Dallas Federal Reserve survey of businesses released last week showed the vast majority of businesses say tariffs have caused harm and most believe that worse is yet to come.
Just 2.1 percent of the 329 businesses that responded to the Federal Reserve survey said that the tariffs have had a "positive impact," while 47.7 percent said the effects have been negative. "The effect is most widespread in manufacturing, where more than 70 percent of firms noted negative impacts, followed by retail, where roughly 60 percent of firms noted negative impacts," the survey notes.
When asked how the tariffs had affected them the most, higher input costs, higher selling prices, and slower supplier delivery times were the most common response. Separately, 48.2 percent of businesses said they had already passed cost increases along to consumers, and 31.9 percent said they had plans to do so.
Looking ahead, few of those same business executives expect the outlook to improve. Just 1.6 percent of the replies in the Federal Reserve survey said they expect the tariffs to have a positive impact over the rest of the year.
At this point, the courts would seemingly be doing both manufacturers and the Trump administration a huge favor by blocking the tariffs. However, the White House seems determined to press forward—Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is now saying the administration will pursue tariffs via other mechanisms, even if the Supreme Court sides with other courts and rules against Trump's sweeping claim of emergency powers to set tariff rates.
No wonder so few businesses are optimistic. The bearings will continue until the White House improves its understanding of basic economics.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
EB;dr
Just two more weeks.
Chumpy-Humpy-Dumpy Simp-Chimp-Chump rides and derides to the rescue, SAVING us all from cumpetitive American manufacturers, who would DARE to try to cumpete with foreigners!!! All of this shit, Chumpy-Humpy-Dumpy Simp-Chimp-Chump does for us... By SNOT reading shit!!! PLEASE, Nobel Cummittee, PLEASE give the Flaming Genius, Chumpy-Humpy-Dumpy Simp-Chimp-Chump, a well-deserved Nobel Prize right away!!!
"The bearings will continue until the White House improves its understanding of basic economics."
I'm trying to get my bearings on this cumment! These bleetings swill cuntinue until they REALLY get my goat!
Not only are the economists' models broken, reality is broken too now. Luckily, the Trump and the MAGA movement have no need for evidence, data, reality, etc.
Besides, if we removed tariffs "our Country would be completely destroyed, and our military power would be instantly obliterated." How's that reality check?
Economists all have TDS.
Health researchers all have TDS.
Universities all have TDS.
Judges all have TDS.
Law firms all have TDS.
Notice a pattern? It's like that joke "Honey, be careful out there - I just saw on the news that someone's driving the wrong way on the freeway." "Someone? Everyone's driving the wrong way!"
Everyone's driving the wrong way!"
I love it.
So cute when shrike adopts his bffs retarded posts.
I notice shrike in all of these strawman you dont actually point to reality or data. Lol.
The bearings will continue until the White House improves its understanding of basic economics.
Will these bearings be in trunkings?
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is now saying the administration will pursue tariffs via other mechanisms, even if the Supreme Court sides with other courts and rules against Trump's sweeping claim of emergency powers to set tariff rates.
Thanks, Brandon.
Yep. The senile guy with porridge brains did it first so even though we howled when he did it, it's fine when He does it. Because He's our Lord and Savior. Anyone else picking up the whiff of a cult?
The Reason articles criticizing Biden's tariffs were ignored by the Trumpians. I think they may have actually been aware that if they joined in then in principle they might have to criticize Trump too, so they chose to not say anything at all and instead pretend that Reason praised Biden's tariffs.
Did you criticize Biden in those posts dumdum?
Shrike did a 2nd sarcbot meme!
Everything is bad! Except for all of the new and returning business.
Tier 1 automotive here. Our outlook is fantastic.
That's how wealth redistribution works. A few benefit at the expense of everyone else. Good for you for being on winners's welfare.
American workers win at the expense of Chinese workers. Darn.
A select few American workers win at the expense of American consumers and small business owners.
Do you have a sense of how the Tier-2 guys are doing? Always curious how it looks further down the chain. Thanks.
We are variously tier 1, tier 2, tier 3, etc. Since many/most auto manufacturers are increasing their work here in the US, everything that they need comes from all of the suppliers down the chain. So, yeah, it's looking good.
The big losers so far are only those that relied on government handouts to be competitive, mostly related to EVs. EVs will happen at their own pace, or they just won't happen.
Economists and other leftists call it concentrated benefits and dispersed costs. Some people win big while everyone else gets the shaft. The winners are highly visible and very loud about it. The losers are many but mostly get ignored because the winners attract most of the intention. Because that contradicts the administration's claim that everyone benefits from the largest tax hike in generations, it has to be leftist.
Sarc heard a new term and will now use it for the next 3 weeks incorrectly lol.
Stupid manufacturering CEOs don't know what a reality TV host knows.
Imaginary gym owners are the real experts.
Hey Boehm, what costs american manufacturing more, these tariffs or regulatory costs? Hint. The answer isnt even close. You spend all your time on the former and ignore the latter. Because your principles isnt reducing burdens on manufacturers but crying over anything about trump.
You've completely ignored the deregulatory agenda. That is an intentional choice.
Manufacturing has been in decline for six months, nearly the exact amount of time since Trump's new trade wars began.
(ps, he copied/pasted that equation in first sentence from somewhere else.)