Chicago Next for National Guard?
Plus: Zohran can't benchpress, Powell speech doesn't exactly soothe markets, Waymo approved for NYC, and more...

Chicago, get ready: "The Pentagon has for weeks been planning a military deployment to Chicago as President Donald Trump says he wants to crack down on crime, homelessness and undocumented immigration, in a model that could later be used in other major cities, officials familiar with the matter said," reports The Washington Post. It looks like at least a few thousand National Guardsmen will be mobilized there as soon as next month. "The mission, if approved, would have parallels to the polarizing and legally contested operation that Trump ordered in Los Angeles in June, when he deployed 4,000 members of the California National Guard and 700 active-duty Marines despite the protests of state and local leaders. The use of thousands of active-duty troops in Chicago also has been discussed but is considered less likely at this time, said two officials who, like others interviewed, spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue."
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
In D.C., more than 2,200 National Guardsman are still deployed, ostensibly to crack down on serious crime in the district, such as the recent spate of carjackings, one of which threatened the life of government worker Edward Coristine. But "the stream of defendants who shuffled through a federal courtroom on Thursday afternoon illustrated the new ways in which laws are being enforced in the nation's capital after the president's takeover of the city's police," reports The New York Times. "They were appearing before a magistrate judge on charges that would typically be handled at the local court level, if they were filed at all. One man had been arrested over an open container of alcohol. Another had been charged with threatening the president after delivering a drunken outburst following his arrest on vandalism." (The guy in question was mentally off his rocker, having just damaged lights outside of a restaurant, and just said a bunch of crazy things before starting to sing. Law enforcement paged the Secret Service claiming "he just made threats to kill the president.")
Getting lowlifes off the streets is a perfectly fine thing for law enforcement to do! But is this is an appropriate use of federal money and manpower? Are these authorities trained to do this type of low-level policing? And will the lawsuits that inevitably result be worth it? (Say, in the case of Torez Riley, who was arrested at Trader Joe's. Police say he had two handguns in his bag; multiple prosecutors inside the U.S. attorney's office say the search was in violation of Riley's Fourth Amendment rights.)
New developments in the Abrego Garcia case: Salvadoran national and Maryland resident Kilmar Abrego Garcia was mistakenly deported by the Trump administration back in March, in violation of a judge's order (background here: "Innocent Father or MS-13 Gang Member?"). He has since been brought back, but detained on human smuggling charges. "He has pleaded not guilty and has asked the judge to dismiss the case, claiming that it is an attempt to punish him for challenging his deportation to El Salvador," per NPR. Now immigration authorities say they're trying to deport him to Uganda (?). But also Costa Rica: "On Friday night, the government informed Abrego that he has until 'first thing' Monday morning to accept a plea in exchange for deportation to Costa Rica, 'or else that offer will be off the table forever,' Abrego's attorneys wrote in a filing as part of their efforts to get the charges in Tennessee dropped over what they consider to be a 'vindictive' and 'selective' prosecution," reports NBC.
Abrego Garcia has an ICE check-in this morning, under the conditions of his parole release. He has reportedly been taken into custody yet again by ICE. He has options, but all of them seem bad: take the Costa Rica deal, take the Uganda deal, or have his lawyers fight the Uganda deal. (The government implies it will deport him to Uganda as soon as Wednesday.) Each choice involves leaving his family behind in Maryland.
"Why Uganda?" you might be wondering. "Last week, Uganda agreed to a deal with the United States to take deported migrants, as long as they don't have criminal records and aren't unaccompanied minors," reports NBC. But "Uganda's Foreign Affairs Ministry said Uganda prefers that migrants sent there be of African nationalities." (Racist!)
President Donald Trump has signaled that convicted criminals in need of deportation will be sent to South Sudan or Eswatini, though neither deal appears to be finalized—and people in Eswatini have already taken umbrage at convict deportations and the conditions these people are held in.
Scenes from New York: Zohran needs to be benched.
For a Men's Day event in Brooklyn, mayoral candidates were asked to benchpress 135 lbs (the bar plus a standard 45-lb. plate on each side). Zohran Mamdani, who is 33, could not do it without substantial help from a spotter—and you can tell he wasn't really lifting from how taut (or not) the rest of his body is. He clearly had no idea what he's doing, and at one point during the lift his leg and foot come off the ground. Current Mayor Eric Adams, who is 64, clearly did know what he was doing, and was able to adeptly execute, calling his opponent "Mamscrawny."
64 vs. 33. A lifetime of hard work vs. a silver spoon. The results speak for themselves.
The weight of the job is too heavy for "Mamscrawny." The only thing he can lift is your taxes. pic.twitter.com/HR6fDPKn0B
— Eric Adams (@ericadamsfornyc) August 24, 2025
Kinda fitting for our Commie future mayor: no self-reliance whatsoever, forced to rely on other people's hard work and muscle.
I will clown on this later, but serious question: How does an otherwise fairly talented campaigner do this in public unless he knows beyond a shadow of a doubt he can do it well? He's offering himself up on a silver bench as the symbol of the Ds' man problem. pic.twitter.com/Rmc3gB0cTD
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) August 24, 2025
QUICK HITS
- At a conference on Friday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell "used his keynote speech to signal the Fed is headed for an interest-rate cut as soon as its next policy meeting in September. Yet there are clear divisions among policymakers over whether that's the right call," reports Bloomberg. "Policymakers are grappling with inflation that's still above their 2% goal—and rising—and a labor market that's showing signs of weakness. That unnerving reality, which pulls policy in opposite directions, is made worse by a high degree of uncertainty about how each of those factors will evolve over the coming months. 'We're getting some cross-currents and it's in a difficult environment,' Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said in an interview on the sidelines of the conference. 'I always say the hardest job the central bank has is to get the timing right at moments of transition.'"
- "Waymo is getting one step closer to rides in New York City," per CNBC. "The Alphabet autonomous vehicle subsidiary received its first permit from the New York Department of Transportation on Friday to start testing in New York City, Mayor Eric Adams announced Friday. The rollout is the city's first autonomous vehicle testing launch. Waymo will start testing up to eight vehicles in Manhattan and Downtown Brooklyn through late September with the potential to extend the program." The kicker: "New York state law requires the company to have a driver behind the wheel to operate." Lol.
- Interesting:
Viktor Orban, lockdowner.
Nayib Bukele, lockdowner.
Adrian Vermeule, lockdowner.
Curtis Yarvin, lockdowner.Notice a pattern among the people that Postliberals cite for their political inspiration?
— Phil Magness (@PhilWMagness) August 23, 2025
- "Trump may come off like a hopelessly needy egocentric (and easy diplomatic mark) with his incessant insistence that Putin's 2022 invasion never would have happened on his watch, but there's corollary analysis that's much more verifiable: Neither former President Joe Biden nor NATO's European members had realistic plans to stop or aggressively roll back the war. Getting to within shouting distance of a Putin-Zelenskyy summit meeting is an achievement in itself," writes Reason's Matt Welch. "If, against the odds, Trump and the Europeans agree on 'Article 5–like' security guarantees for Kyiv, that breakthrough would put Putin in the awkward position of potentially agreeing to conditions—Ukraine being knitted into the geopolitical fabric of Western Europe—that the war was ostensibly waged to prevent….Are Europeans, eight decades after World War II, finally ready to embrace a starring role in their own damned neighborhood?"
- This is legitimately insane:
What if this had been YOUR childhood?@HarrisPoll finds 8-12 yo kids:
45% have not walked in a different aisle than their parents at a store
61% have not made plans with friends without adults helping them
62% have not walked/biked somewhere (a store, park, school) without an…
— Lenore Skenazy (@FreeRangeKids) August 25, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nothing worse than cracking down on crime.
Imagine being butthurt there hasn't been anybody murdered in DC for the last 10 days.
The undertakers association is up in arms! Casket sales plummet!
100% effective with no downsides!
What is the downside?
It is a threat to democracy and personal liberty. That's the reason the Posse Comitatus Act was passed and the reason the founders opposed keeping a standing army.
Rather than reporting to local officials, they report to governors, but really Trump. This is the greatest danger. Civilian police that report directly to the executive.
These are not issues that will reveal themselves within 2 weeks.
You don't get it. Most of these Trump defenders want a national police force that answers to him and him alone. How else is he going to get anything done? He's got illegals to round up and Democrats still have to pay for what they did to him. That's not going to happen with normal law enforcement. Too much accountability. By the way, this has never happened before. There are no historical parallels. And you can trust him. He'd never go back on his word or lash out emotionally.
Talks rachel!
Argument from ignorance and imagination!
You've leveled up your strawmen!
Ironically this is what Sarc was pushing for when the FBI was acting as the Biden junta's OGPU before January.
Everything about the drunken Nazi is projection. He thinks this has to be Trump's motivation because it is Team Sarc's motivation.
TRUMP!!!!!! ARGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
You really don't need to share the sounds you make when you drop a deuce.
Lack of self awareness noted.
Are those like the ideas you drop here often?
Imagine actually dropping a deuce and not just having the whiskey shits in your pants, huh, Sarc?
Outstanding
Sarcles the diminutive drops a single sentence that has three fucking occurrences of “you.”
Ideas indeed.
"It is a threat to democracy..."
Steaming piles of TDS-addled lying shit throw that around as if it meant something.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Be fair. "Democracy" now means some kind of Neo-socialist woke vision for society. Most enforcement of actual laws is indeed a threat.
It is a federal district. Posse Comitatus does not apply.
It is not a threat to democracy at all. I don't think you understand how democracy works. DC is not a state and is run by the federal government.
Posse Comitatus does not apply
I didn't say it did.
It is not a threat to democracy at all.
Oh. That's great. I have no objections then.
I didn't say it did.
Then why bring it up?
Typical Mike response.
Muting that clump of retarded cells is the safest option.
If QB was thinking at all, they would have mentioned Chicago not being a federal jurisdiction. Because with Chicago, posse comitatus does apply but I'm sure they'll gin up some 'emergency' to waive the applicability.
At least in California there were actual emergencies ongoing, but with Chicago it's hard to argue that the status quo of their sky high crime is any kind of federal emergency all of a sudden.
We'll see what happens there, I suppose.
Some of the democrats here dont realize trump says this shit to get democrats to defend out of control crime.
... it's hard to argue that the status quo of their sky high crime is any kind of federal emergency all of a sudden.
Yet that's exactly what Trump will argue, and his defenders will accuse anyone who disagrees of being a leftist.
I'm not entirely convinced that Trump does so intentionally, or if it's just an artifact of his personality that coincidentally is perfect for trolling Democrats.
Either way, despite my personal distaste for his personality, he is the only man who has risen to the occasion to fight fire with fire. Go along to get along Republicans have been feckless for far too long, and Trump seems to have lit a fire under their asses which has been needed for an awfully long time.
Personally I'm still a Rand Paul guy, but at the same time I'd have to admit Rand would not have galvanized the Republicans into action the same way Trump has. Maybe he'll still have his shot, but at this point I very much doubt it.
...he is the only man who has risen to the occasion to fight fire with fire.
Ah yes. If Democrats are going to ignore the law and ignore the Constitution, then by golly Trump better stoop to the same level.
Personally I'm still a Rand Paul guy
He'd never stoop to that level.
Hey fuckwit, he isnt ignoring the constitution. Your ignorance is not proof of that. His EOs call out the statutory and constitutional construction of each order.
God damn youre a fucking moron sarc.
Then why bring it up?
Because the reason that law was enacted is relevant to our discussion, which I clearly articulated.
"It is a threat to democracy and personal liberty."
No it isn't. It's constitutional. In fact the mayor and local DC elections were unconstitutional:
The Congress shall have Power... To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Something being constitutional is not opposite of a threat to democracy and liberty. I am not arguing that this is unconstitutional or illegal.
What else on the constitution is a threat to democracy? (Other than women getting the vote)
I guess congress and their CEO are not elected.
Income tax
You keep saying things are a threat to democracy, but I'm curious what democracy you are referring to exactly since the United States is not, nor has it ever been, a democracy.
One assumes you mean he is a threat to voting, which is of course simply false on the face of it.
If you don't want to be constantly accused for carrying water for the Democrats, consider not using their language that doesn't actually mean anything tangible. It's a complaint about nothing, or if it is a specific complaint you have it would be useful to come out and say what he's actually a threat to, because 'democracy' ain't it.
To democrats, when they day our democracy they merely mean the joint beliefs of their party.
I've noted it as well that when Democrats talk about 'Democracy' what they literally mean is rule by Democrats. It's the only way some of their statements make any sense.
I mean our putative system of government, a federalist, constitutional democratic republic. The one where we're allowed to question the government, speak freely, to move and assemble freely without showing papers or be intimidated. The one with 3 branches of government that check each other's powers. The one where cities and states enforce the civilian laws.
We are not a Democracy. Rights are not determined by majority vote. Stop concern trolling. Nobody here believes you are honest.
So you don’t want a serious discussion? You prefer unwelcome orders, technical nit picks and baseless accusations. Got it.
The District of Columbia was always intended by the founders to be a federal district under exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress, so they put it in the constitution.
The congressmen are elected.
The president is congress' administrator.
The president is elected.
There is nothing anti-democratic about what Trump is doing. There is no lack of liberty in what Trump is doing. Quite the opposite.
Now if he did this to Chicago or Detroit it would be a very different story, but he hasn't.
You have not thought of any other reason the founding fathers opposed a standing army?
As the local and state have FAILED completely at securing the streets for their people, should not a high authority provide the security the citizens pay taxes for and deserve?
Or do you think citizens prefer to walk in shit and piss and stepping over zombies during the middle of the day when they sort of feel safe enough to leave their homes and know they can't go out later because of the violence and crime?
should not a high authority provide the security the citizens pay taxes for and deserve
No. Not if you value federalism and freedom.
Massive illegal immigration, keeping violent criminals on the streets, ignoring actual violations of free speech and liberty and destruction of private property, while locking up Grandma for praying outside an abortion clinic; this is federalism? Forcing everyone to participate in some random pedophiles sexual fantasy is liberty? How about all the kids that disappeared under Biden's (Obama's) immigration policies? Destruction of the middle class over an intentionally modified cold virus with a 99.999% survival rate? You, sarc, pedo Jeff, etc., are either evil fucks who participate in this or you're paid. I'm betting both. Either is just as bad you piece of crap.
Coming up: All that to be enforced by the armed forces.
If the city is incapable of protecting the civil rights of its citizens, somebody has to do it.
Rather telling that people who live in DC are so aggressively retarded that it takes military troops patrolling the area to ensure those people don't start killing each other out of habit. Guess they "just got used to it."
Also rather telling that QB thinks people not murdering each other has downsides.
He isnt a Democrat, he just believes all their narratives and retarded ideas like reformative justice.
Yes, a democrat just like the founders and their distrust of a centrally controlled army performing law enforcement to suppress the populace.
"Standing armies are dangerous to liberty"
--George Mason
"The Army...is a dangerous instrument to play with."
--George Washington
"A standing army is one of the greatest mischiefs that can possibly happen"
--James Madison
"Standing armies are dangerous to liberty."
--Alexander Hamilton
Dude, Democrats are the source of all evil. It even goes back into the Bible. The snake in the Garden was a Democrat. Sodom and Gomorrah were run by Democrats. The pharaohs who enslaved the Jews were Democrats. Democrats killed Jesus. Democrats rewrote the Bible to cover for the misdeeds. All evil in this world can be traced to Democrats.
That doesn't count 80's democrats, does it?
You mean Trump? He has always been the True Republican. He was just pretending do be a Democrat in the 80s.
Are you retarded or something? Most everyone knows Trump was a Dem in the 80s. That’s one of the reasons they (and apparently you) hate him now. He turned slightly right when they went hard left.
Watching you two democrats in denial is fucking amusing as shit.
Remove the plank from your eye.
You have zero justification to reference the Bible heathen.
Wow! Here's a guy who will cast the first stone.
Sodom and Gomorrah were run by Democrats.
This is not even hyperbole.
BTW, shit-for-brains, Washington ended up supporting a standing army, as he (who had experience in war) understood it was required for national defense.
And, just a hint, quoting the founders without context makes you looks like the dim-witted asshole you are; they all held slave, too, shit-for-brains.
Washington ended up supporting a standing army
And when he did, he advocated for a strict separation between civilian and military roles
they all held slave
And?
"And when he did, he advocated for a strict separation between civilian and military roles"
And?
"they all held slave
And?"
Thanks for proving your stupidity.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
And?
So Washington's stance ended up being exactly what I'm arguing for here.
"So Washington's stance ended up being exactly what I'm arguing for here."
With notable exceptions, that's how it has been.
And?
And a police state would be a notable exception.
"And a police state would be a notable exception."
Given that you are a TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit, it is no surprise that you lie about what is going on.
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
Good thing POTUS is a civilian then
Didn't he send the military in to shut down Shay's Rebellion?
No. Shay's rebellion predates the Constitution and was put down by MA state militia.
He did do such with the whiskey rebellion though. Rebellions and civil crime are not the same.
We've had a standing army for over a century. I'm not sure these quotes are specifically about suppressing the populace.
^^ guns outward perfectly okay derp.
The concerns were both about suppressing the populace and the dangers of imperial policies.
You are correct that we quickly dispensed with this idea, but implemented the posse comitatus act specifically because of the issues of using armed forces for civilian enforcement during reconstruction, particularly concerns that the troops were being used to enforce political control.
Is DC Republican yet?
It's been 2 weeks and no problems. I guess it should be fine for everywhere for eternity then?
Who will be the next president?
I've got a couple questions about the posse comitatus act. Does it mention Trump by name? And does it include the National Guard by name as well? If not then Trump can do whatever he wants.
And sarc goes full retard.
Look, if you want to bitch about standing armies notice the fact that America actually does have one and it has existed long before you were born, the Constitution be damned. They did this by technicality, but it doesn't change the fact it's a standing army.
To quote HRC, 'At this point, what difference does it make'.
Yes. I know. It's probably not a practical option anymore. That doesn't mean the reason the founders feared a standing army is also no longer relevant. I think it means we should be more cautious than ever about civilian enforcement with armed forces.
Regardless of your TDS-fueled fantasies, it seems we are.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
The reason is still relevant, but also entirely moot and has been for over a century now. In fact, it's been more or less moot since George Washington put down the Whiskey Rebellion.
Also rather telling that QB thinks people not murdering each other has downsides.
Will you admit a poor faith strawman here, or that you're dumb enough to think this is what I'm saying?
Normally RR is better than that. You must have struck a nerve.
I get under his skin, but not intentionally.
He's one of the few in these comments who can have a rational debate with disagreement and not turn into a Jesse.
Neither you nor Mike have rational or intelligent thoughts.
Cite: this thread.
They disagree. Their cite is the romantic getaway they shared at a Half Million Dollar House!
Will you admit a poor faith strawman here, or that you're dumb enough to think this is what I'm saying?
Another QB false dilemma. You're the one that claimed that "you get used to" people shooting each other in urban shitholes. Sounds like you're more peeved that even people with this kind of low impulse control realize that not going off when the Nasty Girls are roaming around is a smart decision to make.
OK. Dumb enough it is.
you get used to" people shooting each other in urban shitholes
But what did I really say?
OK. Dumb enough it is.
Yeah, like chemtard, you don't like your own words being brought up.
But what did I really say?
I just cited it, you disingenuous mook. You're the one crying that it took the presence of NGs to quickly drop crimes. How about criticizing the retards causing the crime, instead of shrugging your shoulders at it as something you "get used to" living with?
Why does anyone need to criticize criminals? That's just a dumb distraction. Of course people don't like violent criminals. Saying that someone doesn't has got to be one of the dumbest strawman arguments ever. So dumb it makes Jesse and ML look like honest people who argue in good faith.
Again Sarc refuses to use the "strawman" smear correctly, and has the balls to call someone else "dumb".
Amazing.
Lol.
Because. You, Mike, and Jeff actually defend criminals. It isnt even about criticizing them.
You demand no accountability.
I said "you get used to" living in a high crime area. It lets you put it in perspective with other risks and problems in life.
But, you think that means I'm OK with murder. That's just stupid. You also mistake my weighing of the tradeoffs of soldiers on the street for reduced crime as just being OK with high crime. It's a ridiculously stupid thing to think. You way-oversimplified the argument in your mind so as to eliminate any reason for opposition. Silly.
But, you think that means I'm OK with murder. That's just stupid.
Youre the one who shrugged your shoulders at it. I simply reminded you of that fact. Hence, the rhetorical handwaving.
It's like the Democrats trying to figure out how to quit bleeding support from young men. Instead of giving young men valid reasons to support them, they're flailing around trying to "re-frame" their anti-white/male beliefs because they think using a different set of magic words will produce a different result.
Democrats could simply admit, "yeah, crime is pretty bad right now" and provide tangible solutions to correct that. But the solutions they do offer suck, the crime is still bad, and they've backed themselves into a corner trying to defend it because admitting that it's even a problem gives Trump a W.
Democrats could simply admit, "yeah, crime is pretty bad right now" and provide tangible solutions to correct that.
This is the part that is often ignored. Democrats like to pretend everything is fine in places like Chicago and Washington D.C. but notably it is not 'fine' because they aren't doing their jobs, and intentionally so.
Democrats aren't necessarily alone in that, politicians in general don't like it pointed out when they are failing at their jobs, but major cities are generally where the crime is and generally those cities are ruled by progressive Democrats.
The problem for Democrats is they've hung their hat on 'police are racist' and so any support for police or tackling entrenched overwhelmingly minority crime, by their own measure, is racist and they simply can't reconcile those things.
Take Eric Garner as an example. He was a thug who was in the middle of an overdose, and while resisting arrest died from that overdose but the narrative that was sold was racist police killed a black guy for no reason. Their racism is so entrenched and ingrained they can't see the problem, essentially.
You are beyond parody.
Libertarians be that way.
It takes all the excitement out of urban living!
Unaccountable crimenis the greatest freedom.
Yet there are clear divisions among policymakers over whether that's the right call,"
They will undoubtedly make the wrong call.
The Pentagon has for weeks been planning a military deployment to Chicago...
...where they will immediately be corrupted by the machine.
In D.C., more than 2,200 National Guardsman are still deployed...
QUAGMIRE ALERT
(Don't reply with giggity.)
Dammit.
no blood for crime!
Last week, Uganda agreed to a deal with the United States to take deported migrants...
SENDING A HUMAN TRAFFICKER TO AFRICA??? Come on, man.
But "Uganda's Foreign Affairs Ministry said Uganda prefers that migrants sent there be of African nationalities."
Their latest dictator prefers dark meat?
Well at least one of the official languages of Uganda is English. Which we know all the Spanish speaking illegals sent there are obviously fluent in since they were deported from America.
Oh wait...
The three major indigenous language families are Bantu, Central Sudanic, and Nilotic. Swahili and Luganda are also spoken.
Spanish and Swahili both start with an S so... close enough?
Or does it matter whether someone being deported to a random country in Africa have any idea how to communicate with anyone once there?? (not specifically to Mr Abrego-Garcia who likely knows some basic English...but he isn't the only one taking a one way flight to Africa.)
"Or does it matter whether someone being deported to a random country in Africa have any idea how to communicate with anyone once there??"
Not to me.
Cosigned. The illegal alien piece of shit criminals can self deport now.
And I thought these people were fleeing their homelands due to oppression and not just looking for a perpetual free ride paid for by a cuckold class of western taxpayer.
I still don't get why people are clamoring to live here. Don't they know we invented slavery?
Hey not a lawyer, what are the requirements in law for deportation to a 3rd party country?
Garcia can always wave his protection, based on a lie, and return to ES.
No impact for me.
He could always self-deport.
If he will not, then we have to deal with it.
Heh, it is a bit ironic...no?
For a Men's Day event in Brooklyn, mayoral candidates were asked to benchpress 135 lbs (the bar plus a standard 45-lb. plate on each side).
Communist party leaders are never expected to do the heavy lifting.
Real bench press has never been tried.
Well, not at this event, anyway.
Who needs two different types of weights. Those 45 lb plates are a capitalist lie.
he could have at least tried to swindle us with the fake Styrofoam 45's. What kind of communist leader is he?!?! Kim Jong Un would have had 315 on there for warm up reps.
important, relevant:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2eW6jezNfU
As if a Marxist politician ever lifted anything heavier than money
In Russia, bench presses you.
At a conference on Friday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell "used his keynote speech to signal the Fed is headed for an interest-rate cut...
Well, my interest in the cut rate loser is at an all time low.
(Mr. President, I am available as a ghost tweet writer in you're in the need.)
A whole lot of people think it's just fine that an illegal immigrant truck driver killed 3 people and that he shouldn't be deported for it. I guess he's sorry for what he did and that makes it ok.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/1-6-million-sign-petition-for-indian-driver-held-in-florida-crash-that-killed-three/ar-AA1L5JVV
Harjinder Singh, a 28-year-old Indian truck driver, has received a wave of online support after being arrested in connection with a fatal road incident. Singh, who illegally entered the United States in 2018, is facing vehicular homicide charges after allegedly making a wrong turn on a Florida highway that resulted in the deaths of three people.
At the time of the accident that took place on August 12, Singh was in California, from where he was later transferred to Florida. His commercial driver's license was also issued in California. The incident has renewed concerns amongst some about the risks posed by undocumented migrants.
Since his arrest, an online petition calling for Singh's release has gained significant traction, collecting 1.6 million signatures so far.
We found the 1.6 million people that are weaker than Zohran Mamdani.
weaker in constitution/morality, but still half of those 1.6 probably outbench him
Who should have been deported eight years ago, except he claimed fearing for his life if he was sent back to India and the Biden Administration credulously believed him. He was issued a commercial drivers licenses in Washington State and California, despite lacking proficiency in English, or knowing what most road signs mean.
Those three deaths are arguably on the toxic empathy of the Left.
An interesting analysis of how in the world Singh was able to be driving that truck despite being woefully unqualified:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQAkl_7oWuI&t=324s
Reminder.
Usaid funded legal, activist and religious groups to train illegals in how to commit fraud for asylum.
Those three deaths are arguably on the toxic empathy of the Left.
Sometimes to flatten people's freedoms you've gotta sacrifice a few cancer patients and assisted living residents to save everyone else's grandma.
No matter how much you hate "compassionate" leftist simps, you don't hate them enough.
At the time of the accident that took place on August 12, Singh was in California
Um, at the time of the incident, he was most definitely in Florida, making an illegal U-Turn on the turnpike.
Looks like a translation error. He apparently returned to California after the crash, where he was later arrested before being returned to Florida.
https://www.wpbf.com/article/florida-fatal-turnpike-crash-harjinder-singh/65872769
I have to wonder how the Hell he managed to get back to CA. Why was he not already in custody?
Well since we didn't hear about any other crashes, we can assume he didn't drive back.
For some reason he was not arrested on the spot and Florida had to go through extradition proceedings with California to get him back for trial.
Singh, who illegally entered the United States in 2018, is facing vehicular homicide charges after allegedly making a wrong turn on a Florida highway that resulted in the deaths of three people.
At the time of the accident that took place on August 12, Singh was in California
So he traveled from India to CA without entering any 3rd countries and caused an accident in FL while he was in CA? Seems like we're going to have to get his powers of teleportation/superposition under control first.
Speaking as a retired semi driver I'd be willing to bet that 99 percent of truck drivers would support locking this asshole up. He was committing a moving violation and any rookie would have passed on that turn just by eyeballing it. And there was an overpass half a mile away. There are multiple reasons why he shouldn't have a CDL but the main one is he's completely incompetent. Accidents will happen but this was no accident. He deliberately put lives in danger to save a few minutes. Looks like negligent homicide to me.
I think the driver went for the nearest crossover after missing his exit. The next exit there is 40+ miles away with the next place to turn around being a service area about 30 miles away. If you look at Google Street View, there are multiple tire marks there from semis using it so he’s not the first. The FHP should probably stake out that crossover and they’d probably catch a shitload of truckers doing the same damn thing.
As far as I’m concerned, having driven in 48 states (excluding Alaska and New Mexico), I want the fucker to publicly hang for this.
My guess is that the GPS started screaming at him and he decided to turn around illegally because either it told him to (My GPS doesn't particularly care about traffic laws and has no idea about traffic signals), or it was telling him that his destination was now 90 minutes away, instead of 5.
Maybe I had bad information about the overpass, never went south of Georgia myself because Florida is a black hole for flatbed freight. But making a u turn with an empty 48 foot flat is different than doing it with 40k in a reefer. He might have made it but he got his landing gear jammed. But it doesn't matter. He made the call and he knew it was risky. Yeah every driver has to get turned around at some point and sometimes you have to drive a lot of miles to get it done. But blocking two lanes of traffic with the four wheelers doing 80 is just a bullshit move and he knew it. This is incompetence and negligence and I have zero sympathy for this asshole. The whole industry is based on a couple of myths. One is that truck driving is unskilled labor. I've done a lot of things things in my life but 15 years of driving a 40 ton truck was by far the most challenging and to say it requires no skill is ridiculous as this incident proves. The other myth is that there is a truck driver shortage when the reality is that drivers are not compensated for the deprivation, exhausting hours and liability that they are exposed to. It's just not worth it for most people. These myths lead politicians who get all of their information from the mega carriers to think that they can fast track illegals into an easy job that Americans won't do. But driving a big truck is not equivalent to picking fruit or cleaning toilets. It's very demanding and very dangerous and we're seeing the consequences of putting low paid unqualified immigrants in the driver's seat play out. So yeah put this asshole in prison and the carrier that put him on the road. And then deport the lot of them.
Nothing says freedom quite like soldiers at checkpoints demanding papers.
Nothing says freedom liked getting mugged or carjacked.
Thanks rachel!
Maybe they should be policing themselves. Oh, wait...we tried that and it didn't fucking work.
"Can't round up illegals without soldiers stopping every car and demanding papers from everyone inside. So what if it's against the law? Doesn't matter. We've got vermin to catch."
Just yesterday you were claiming it was your enemies who didnt want equality under the law. Yet here you are again stating no accountability to the law for your favored groups.
I. for one, welcome our new fascist overlords!
I, for one, do not welcome the TDS-addled lying piles of slimy shit throwing around words as if they had some understanding of the meanings.
Whats supposed to be wrong with fascism?
Singapore is a fascist state and it is the safest place in the world!
Singapore is more authoritarian than fascist. Fascism requires the state to dictate to private businesses how they are to operate along with some collusion between the state and the corporate hierarchy. That latter bit is called Corporatism, and is an essential part of fascism.
Remember the words of Benito Mussolini when looking at what fascism is, “all within the state, nothing outside of the state, nothing against the state.” In other words, the state is a collectivist all.
Freedom is a double-edged sword. The problem is that freedom is not anarchy. As I said above, it's taken the NGs patrolling the streets to actually get the more violent residents of DC to take stock and exercise some discretion, which normally doesn't happen in big cities due to the general social dysfunction of mass societies.
In the same vein, Bukele never would have built that super-prison and put 5% of the population in jail if the cartels hadn't rewarded his good-faith effort to keep the violence down by massacring dozens of people in San Salvador. Now that ultra-violent population is in jail, and El Salvador went from being one of the most violent countries in Central America to one of the safest. It shouldn't have had to happen that way, but the cartels didn't want to play ball, and decided to fuck around and find out with someone who wasn't going to take their shit.
As long as blue city mayors are content with letting their most feral residents victimize those who are just trying to go about their business, in the name of political expediency, then they shouldn't be surprised when Trump decides he's not going to let them enable those same residents in the name of their retarded leftist religious beliefs.
There is a murky legal basis for sending NGs to DC. But not for the rest of the country. Not without declaring fake emergencies. Then there's that saying about liberty and security.
You know who else declared fake emergencies?
The boy who cried wolfe?
Democrats did it first so that makes it ok?
And here we are with Sarc’s same old shitty troll. Find some new straw, dip,
Those who sacrifice security for the illusion of liberty deserve neither.
No there isnt.
They were there for months after J6 retard. You cheered it.
Emergency. 100's of people per week, children and other innocents included, not just gang member drug dealers and thugs are being killed.
More death occurring in some cities than in wars in fact. Sounds like a legal reason to protect citizens as noted in the oath of office.
What about our freedom to be safe?
Singapore has true freedom, because they dont care about criminals' feelings!
New York state law requires the company to have a driver behind the wheel to operate.
And that driver has to be union.
He doesn't have to be union, but it would be a shame if something happened to your truck while a non-union laborer was supervising the autonomous driving software.
He has options, but all of them seem bad:
There is one option you are clearly leaving out. But given your open borders agenda, you would see it as the worst possible option.
So we're back to pushing the "Maryland Man" lie are we Liz? Fuck off you dishonest Leftist cunt. The only mistake was on the original paperwork years prior that said he couldn't be deported to Guatemala, not El Salvador, but you have your "I hate America" agenda to push with all the other lefties so you're taking the word of Dem operatives as gospel over any and all evidence.
You fucking deserve Mandami.
Media want's so desperately for there to be "victims" in Trump crackdown. They choke on it almost every time.
https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/5464079-police-arrested-that-guy-for-good-reason-journalists-shocked/
A handful of reporters and pundits were outraged this week after footage emerged showing law enforcement officers in the nation’s capital roughly arresting a Hispanic man who tried to escape on foot during a traffic stop.
“BREAKING,” tweeted NBC News Washington, D.C., affiliate reporter Aimee Cho, “Just saw police and federal agents detain a man on the National Mall. He appeared to try to escape, then was quickly tackled to the ground by several agents and was screaming in Spanish, ‘Please, I’m not a criminal, I work here, I want to be with my family!’”
“His crying [hits] me in the gut,” said Miami Herald investigative reporter Julie K. Brown in reaction to the online video of Perez-Teofani’s arrest. “And we will probably never be told who he is, why he was stopped, or if he was here illegally.”
Fox News liberal heel Jessica Tarlov, in a since-deleted tweet, wrote, “This doesn’t make DC safer. It’ll just make people not come to DC. The cruelty is always the point.”
“New normal,” Politico senior legal affairs reporter Josh Gerstein dryly quipped.
The arrested man, David Perez-Teofani, has entered the U.S. illegally three times, according to federal authorities. When he was arrested this week, he was defying a “final order of removal” after returning to Mexico twice before.
Perez-Teofani was also charged in 2024 with “indecent liberties with a child under the age of 15 and aggravated sexual battery,” according to Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court records reviewed by the New York Post.
Just a 'DC family man' (who could be from Maryland), right?
Fox News liberal heel Jessica Tarlov, in a since-deleted tweet, wrote, “This doesn’t make DC safer. It’ll just make people not come to DC. The cruelty is always the point.”
JFC, this is a sarc quote.
Well sarc is also a narrative repeating Socrates with low intelligence.
How dare it autocorrect democrat to Socrates.
lol
What's that old saying? A liberal is just a conservative who hasn't been mugged yet? Or maybe raped.
That's the old way.
Now, Proggies would rather be mugged/raped/killed than throw a black/brown criminal in jail. Cuz' White Supremacy.
Perez-Teofani was also charged in 2024 with “indecent liberties with a child under the age of 15 and aggravated sexual battery,” according to Fairfax County Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court records reviewed by the New York Post.
Too many people (as in more than zero) would argue that the girl was lucky.
I read such comments whenever there are news stories about teachers having indecent liberties with underage students.
"“His crying [hits] me in the gut,” said Miami Herald investigative reporter Julie K. Brown in reaction to the online video of Perez-Teofani’s arrest. “And we will probably never be told who he is, why he was stopped, or if he was here illegally.”"
That is the mentality that we want out of an "investigative reporter". I bet her work is totes super-solid.
The Washington Post
The New York Times
NPR
NBC (twice)
Hey Liz; ever hear of using reliable sources?
She could use the voices in her head like a certain commenter here often does.
There are only two reliable sources. Fox News and Truth Social. Everything else is leftist lies.
Zzzzz
Thanks rachel!
Anyone notice sarc is sounding more and more like Jeff? Do we have a love connection?
Sarc just wants a friend, but he doesn't realize that hell has no friends, only dupes and victims.
Who here cites those as sources?
I lost fox, but sarcjeff has never been able to tell me what is wrong with the articles.
Meanwhile the errors and lies from thr above sources are pointed out all the time. They are legion.
Don't even have truth social. Only Mike does here.
I can't even get Fox on cable in my neck of the woods, but Shrike constantly insists I'm a watcher. These guys don't have many rhetorical plays left.
Thank Gaia for those wise Canadian state censors, eh?
It really was censorship in a sense. The Canadian broadcast licensor wouldn't give them a license, because Fox didn't want to create the mandatory amount of Canadian content required for a news channel to broadcast in Canada.
Would a three hour "Fuck Justin Trudeau" show five times a week have qualified? 🙂
It has to be purchased through a cable package but is available nonetheless.
Parody.
>>reliable sources?
Stelter!
Scenes from New York: Zohran needs to be benched
You and NYC deserve everything that is about to happen to you. I hope my state passes a $100,000 relocation tax for New Yorkers because there is going to be an exodus.
Not certain they will be allowed to leave.
NYC is the perfect example of what happens when your political view is to never fight back while calling it principle. Fuck em.
I love his plan to not punish misdemeanors. If he is elected regardless, the city will get what it voted for ---- good and hard.
How does an otherwise fairly talented campaigner do this in public unless he knows beyond a shadow of a doubt he can do it well?
Hubris, hubris and ignorance.
Joe Biden, lockdowner.
Justin Trudeau, lockdowner.
Xi Jinping, lockdowner.
Scott Morrison, lockdowner.
Notice a pattern among the people that liberals cite for their political inspiration?
The whole world locked down. Not sure this is the flex you think it is unless it is to critize the centralization of power more broadly then just the group of people you find most repugnant.
The whole world locked down
I recall driving through a few states where nothing had changed.
Guess you didn't get to Illinois.
Or Minnesota. Walz even sent the state police to go after anyone defying his orders.
With free tampons?
I couldn't believe for a few minutes after hearing a person was arrested for surfing, on the water, on an otherwise completely empty beach that this was happening.
But then realizing, California, was all it took.
Teacher's unions are just a funnel of taxpayer dollars into leftist pockets. FDR had it right, there should never be public-sector unions. "All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/nation-s-2-largest-teachers-unions-funneled-nearly-50m-to-left-wing-groups-watchdog-report-says/ar-AA1L6XCY
Aaron Withe, an expert on public-sector unions, pointed out that the National Education Association spends less than 10% of its budget on what he called "representational activities," while, at the same time, the union spends 38% of its budget on contributions to left-leaning groups, lobbying and political gifts.
Left-wing philanthropic behemoths like the Tides Network, New Venture Fund, Sixteen-Thirty Fund, and Future Forward, the last of which was the main Super PAC supporting Kamla Harris' 2024 presidential run after former President Joe Biden dropped out, all received a combined nearly $1.5 million from the unions, according to the report.
The unions also forked over significant amounts of cash for groups that focus on supporting left-wing candidates for public office, such as the Democratic Governors Association, Democrat's House Majority and Senate Majority PACs.
https://time.com/6267979/government-unions-corrupt-democracy/
No public purpose is served by union controls. Nor do union controls make government an attractive employer. Good candidates are repelled by toxic public cultures without energy or pride. Union controls serve only to transfer governing authority to union officials, who exercise that authority mainly to pad public employment and insulate government workers from supervisory judgments.
"Each choice involves leaving his family behind in Maryland."
HIs family could go with him.
As a kid my family moved several times because my father was sent to different locations to work or got new jobs in different locations. Uprooted the family multiple times, torn out of schools and friendships, moved 1000 miles from "home". But the family stayed together.
Yeah, but you probably didn't have Zoom or X or Facebook or smartphones to stay in near constant contact with your friends and family either, Boomer.
His defense lawyer's new tactic is to claim that it's unreasonable to send him to Uganda because he doesn't speak their language.
The official languages of Uganda are both Swahili and ENGLISH.
He uses an interpreter to talk to the press, because he doesn't speak English, either.
They do speak Spanish in El Salvador.
Did anybody advise the lawyer he can self-deport anywhere he can get them to take him?
^^ this ... cien por ciento
Jeffarc/Reason immigration policies.
Dr. Maalouf
@realMaalouf
ENGLAND: Muhammad from Pakistan attempted to rape a 13-year-old British girl in Bradford.
His wife intervened to defend him: "He didn’t know it was illegal. Please, I promise he will never do this again."
What kind of culture is this, where even the wife thinks it’s normal?
https://x.com/realMaalouf/status/1958505347561201708
Illegal pays to rape 13 year old.
In court Thursday, Rocha Mejia offered a statement while speaking through an interpreter, saying he had a sick daughter and a wife in Nicaragua. He said his wife and daughter ask when he’s coming home. Rocha Mejia appealed to the judge and asked for mercy, claiming ignorance and promising to be a good person.
https://www.wbay.com/2025/08/21/man-sentenced-40-years-sexual-assault-child-fond-du-lac/
Should an adult be allowed on the streets who does not know raping 13 year olds is illegal?
Should we make sure the prisoners at his jail learn of his confusion and place him in general pop to give him a necessary bit of education?
"It was only a little rape. She was Kafir so it doesn't count".
So long as he's sorry, we should overlook his cultural differences. Or so I've heard.
"Rocha Mejia appealed to the judge and asked for mercy, claiming ignorance and promising to be a good person."
This is what Jeff argued right here should be exonerating circumstances in the Muslim illegals' gang rape of a 12 year old in Germany. "What if they felt bad about it after?"
Please tell me you're exaggerating about jeff.
I am still hoping that the citizens decimate every single official involved in the whole affair.
He is not exaggerating.
So there is such a thing as rape culture.
What are feminist groups saying about this?
They are lower on the intersectional totem pole. They have to lie back and think of progressivism.
Niccccccccce....
Jeffsarc/Reason trans policy.
Neo nazi man sent to woman's prison.
https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/neo-nazi-womens-prison-changing-gender-vj5zvwm89
Balding man allowed to change in girls HS locker room.
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1958683308742611412
Neo nazi man sent to woman's prison.
My favorite part is the broad or repeated assumptions or vague insinuations of (progressively worse?) crimes(?) all the way down:
do they play Kraftwerk in women's prison?
Neue Deutche Härte (New German Hard) seems more appropriate. Rammstein's Mein Teil (My Piece*) particularly.
*A reference to male genitalia far, far worse than 2 Girls, 1 Cup. You have been warned.
I have to say this guy's trolling is pretty epic. These assholes painted themselves into a corner and he's getting the last laugh.
This was always the plan in California.
Collin Rugg
@CollinRugg
A foreign investor has quietly gobbled up 9 oceanfront lots in Malibu for $65 million following the January wildfires.
The investor reportedly assembled a team to track down owners because the "desirable" sites weren't publicly listed.
"He started building a team on his end of expediters, architects and kind of figured out what the best size lots and frontage would be to build on to eventually resell," said the agent, Weston Littlefield of the Weston James Group, to Realtor . com.
"I’d say probably about 50% had sentimental value to their properties just based on memories, or their parents passed it down to them."
"But a lot of them, ultimately, just didn’t want to go through the rebuilding process because of how long they knew it was going to take to really come back."
Infuriating.
Infuriating and predictable.
Who's the "foreign investor" and what country are they from?
New Zealand apparently. Offering 50% on prior bookings prior to the fire.
Everybody with an IQ above 50 knew this was going to happen.
Just like Lahaina.
Sarcs principled set of conservatives are working on legislation to force Trump to spend more money.
https://redstate.com/streiff/2025/08/23/senate-considers-measures-to-force-trump-to-spend-more-money-n2193149
Boehm and the TDS crew are salivating to blame Trump.
D's tomorrow:
Weight Training is racist and bad for the environment.
D's next year:
We will tax every pound you lift.
Nobody needs 23 kinds of muscles.
MRNA will take care of that.
Just mandate Ozempic. Viola! Equilibrium is now reality.
That's more-or-less old news...
According to MSNBC, if you exercise and work out, you’re a Nazi
Pandemic fitness trends have gone extreme — literally (msnbc.com)
White supremacists' latest scheme to valorize violence and hypermasculinity has gone digital.
Physical fitness has always been central to the far right. In “Mein Kampf,” Hitler fixated on boxing and jujitsu, believing they could help him create an army of millions whose aggressive spirit and impeccably trained bodies, combined with “fanatical love of the fatherland,” would do more for the German nation than any “mediocre” tactical weapons training.
The intersection of extremism and fitness leans into a shared obsession with the male body, training, masculinity, testosterone, strength and competition. Physical fitness training, especially in combat sports, appeals to the far right for many reasons: fighters are trained to accept significant physical pain, to be “warriors,” and to embrace messaging around solidarity, heroism, and brotherhood. It’s championed as a tool to help fight the “coming race war” and the street battles that will precede it. Recruits are encouraged to link individual moral virtues such as willpower, decisiveness and courage, with desired collective traits such as virility and manliness. This also works in reverse, with white supremacists encouraging potential recruits or activists to stay in good physical shape as a way of managing self-presentation to the public. The neo-Nazi blogger Andrew Anglin advised his followers that “fat people” should be required to commit to losing weight if they are to stay involved with groups or in-person gatherings, noting that “continued obesity should not be tolerated.”
For those of us working to find better pathways to reach at-risk youth, understanding the ways that far-right groups recruit and socialize youth — in ways that go well beyond rhetoric and ideas — is crucial. It’s critical that leaders, including parents, physical trainers, gym owners, coaches and others in the fitness world understand how online grooming and recruitment can intersect with spaces that we generally think of as promoting health and well-being. The realm of online fitness now provides a new and ever-expanding market for reaching and radicalizing young men; and it requires our targeted focus and resources to try and stop the cycle.
That last paragraph is a kick in the head, too. Try reading it with the mental substitution for social media geared toward telling kids they are a different gender. But apparently, "grooming" is impossible for leftists promoting radical gender ideology directed at pre-teens, because they're just providing "gender-affirming care".
"if you exercise and work out, you’re a Nazi
Jeff has been ahead of the curve on this one.
Did a chick write that? Because I feel like a chick wrote that.
Not just a chick, a femiNazi.
There's been a bunch of throat-clearing in legacy sports media recently about Theodore Roosevelt encouraging men to play football because he considered it a masculine endeavor that would toughen them up.
The left doesn't mind you being physically fit as long as you do their approved activities, like bike riding, hiking or running. They've always considered guys with big muscles to be meatheads because that's who their rivals were in high school. It's nothing more than a bunch of big-mouthed sissy nerds projecting their trauma.
"CNN’s Elie Honig Explains ‘Monumental’ Ruling Against Letitia James"
[...]
"CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig said on Thursday that an appeals court’s “monumental” ruling against Democrat Attorney General of New York Letitia James is a “huge win” for President Donald Trump..."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/cnn-s-elie-honig-explains-monumental-ruling-against-letitia-james/ar-AA1KYvzy?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=68a87dd791df486981aef28407dfa17a&ei=11
A CNN host said that.
>>Getting lowlifes off the streets is a perfectly fine thing for law enforcement to do! But is this is an appropriate use of federal money and manpower?
they certainly can't let Grodin in with a pencil & legal pad to fix it now.
>> The kicker: "New York state law requires the company to have a driver behind the wheel to operate." Lol.
the ultimate no-show job.
Leave Chicago, LA, NYC, Philly, St. Louis, and all the other deep blue violent shitholes as-is. If they want to eat themselves, leave them to it.
That only works if they're properly quarantined. Otherwise, the disease spreads when there's nothing left to eat.
Exactly. Not a nickel from the rest of us to rescue them.
such as the recent spate of carjackings, one of which threatened the life of government worker Edward Coristine.
He's not dead yet. his name is still Big Balls
"[The judge] was so worried about putting “hardship” on the boy’s family by making them drive to a youth shelter that she just sent him home to his mom.
From The Post Millennial:
The two teens who were charged in the attempted carjacking and beating of a former DOGE staffer earlier in August were released on orders from Biden-appointed DC Superior Court Judge Kendra D. Biggs. The 15-year-old boy and girl from Maryland were being held at DC’s Youth Services Center but have been removed to a youth shelter and to his mother, respectively.
>>He has options, but all of them seem bad: take the Costa Rica deal, take the Uganda deal, or have his lawyers fight the Uganda deal.
he had options and chose poorly.
Note to President Trump: Do not send troops to Chicago.
That notorious democrat-run hell hole has over 180 homicides this year and looks forward to breaking the 400 mark by the end of the year.
Sending in troops will impede said coveted record and ruin any chance of being the Murder Capital of the World.
Plus, such a policy of sending in troops to keep the peace in Chicago is racist since most of the victims and shooters are black.
So please do not send troops to Chicago because doing so would only show the world you care more about the good, decent people, what's left of them in Chicago, than the violent criminals all leftists embrace, apologize for and love without end.
Contrary to Sarc and company's squeals, what Trump did in DC was perfectly constitutional, because constitutionally it is to be run by the federal government, specifically congress through their administrator (Trump), and not supposed to be run by some mayor and local elections.
But if he did it in Chicago that would be an entirely different matter.
Trump could do like Eisenhower in Little Rock, and segregate the troops before sending them in, only use the black troops this time.
"But is this is an appropriate use of federal money and manpower? Are these authorities trained to do this type of low-level policing?"
Jeepers, talk about a concern troll from Reason of all places.
So, these fuckwits just don't remember that the U.S. Army were the police in places like Afghanistan for something like a decade plus?
"Why Uganda?" you might be wondering. "Last week, Uganda agreed to a deal with the United States to take deported migrants, as long as they don't have criminal records and aren't unaccompanied minors," reports NBC.
So Uganda doesn't want criminal immigrants either...
'But "the stream of defendants who shuffled through a federal courtroom on Thursday afternoon illustrated the new ways in which laws are being enforced in the nation's capital after the president's takeover of the city's police," reports The New York Times. "They were appearing before a magistrate judge on charges that would typically be handled at the local court level, if they were filed at all.'
What are you saying, Liz? Do you want libertine anarchy with no laws? Or do you want to continue the pretense of selective enforcement of endless laws still being crafted by Karens and statists?
Kinda fitting for our Commie future mayor: no self-reliance whatsoever, forced to rely on other people's hard work and muscle.
Um, the strategically and reluctantly voted for party has been pushing out testosterone for 50 years.
That's parody right? Because I can't read it any other way.
No it is not.
Oh shit .
Alan Alda on women particularly terrifying.
'Say, in the case of Torez Riley, who was arrested at Trader Joe's. Police say he had two handguns in his bag; multiple prosecutors inside the U.S. attorney's office say the search was in violation of Riley's Fourth Amendment rights.'
So here's the logical problem I have with how the current legal system enforces our laws. If somebody, like Riley, breaks a law (we can talk about valid laws another time), and then somebody, like the cop at Trader Joes, breaks another law, why do they cancel each other and we pretend that nothing happened?
How about prosecuting everyone for what they actually did?
Fruit of the poisonous tree is the reason. Yeah, it sucks when some jackass gets off because the cops didn't follow the law but the solution to that is for cops to follow the law, not to prosecute someone for things discovered during an unconstitutional search.
The same prosecutors who helped turn the city into a shithole wish to keep it a shithole.
'Now immigration authorities say they're trying to deport him to Uganda (?). But also Costa Rica'
Split the difference?
And whichever country pleads that this isn't done, is his true home.
'For a Men's Day event in Brooklyn'
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Wonder how many of the “men” in Brooklyn had penises at birth?
Insane helicopter parenting?
Brought to you by the emasculated nanny left, who wish for the same "caring" but intrusive oversight for every other aspect of society, including politics and economics.
In case you have not seen the Bee today, they scored another LOL for me with this:
Al Qaeda Claims Responsibility For Cracker Barrel Logo Change
When I was a kid, my friends and I would get out our army men and pretend to occupy different US cities and states, which I guess was more interesting than fighting the USSR at the time. Anyway, none of us have been elected to any office.
Jeffy’s not gonna like this. Oh, well.
https://x.com/blanchardphd/status/1959320054807318947?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
I have to say I would be one fuckin ugly woman! No way I would ever want to have sex with me.
Is there such a thing as a woman so ugly that they couldn't have sex if they wanted? I don't believe it.
Not to impugn the sexual proclivities of black men, but I have to note that a lot of black guys I know don't seem to have any maximum weight restriction when it comes to white chicks.
And several of them are pretty good looking dudes, so they could certainly do better. I don't really get it personally, but my best guess is it's a fetish of some kind. And no, it doesn't have anything to do with the personality of the women unless they also have a fetish for shrill annoying chicks.
Fascist governments always claim that crackdowns and military responses are about crime and national security. But fascist actions are still fascist even if fascists say otherwise.
Illinois needs to mobilize their National Guard and defend their cities from a military occupation of a fascist army.
"...fascist army..."
TDS-addled lying piles of slimy shit toss magic words around as if they had any idea of what they meant.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
The US is a fascist country, which makes the US Army a fascist army.
Cite?
Lie:
"The US is a fascist country,.."
Truth:
MollyGodiva.
Is.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
You learned this in PHD school?
I'm starting to think Molly is a schill living in China.
You are a racist piece of fucking shit. Take your plantation mentality out of here.
Pretends to have a doctorate, cant be bothered to learn the definition. The left in a nutshell.
Fascist governments like Walz sending the state police to shut down any business in the state that dared to defy his lockdown orders? Like JB Pritzker renewing his own emergency declaration 40 times without the consent of the people or the General Assembly? Like Newsom ordering businesses to shut down while he holds a party at the French Laundry?
No. I mean a fascist army from a National Socialist government, exactly like the one Trump is running.
No, Molly, I hate to burst your bubble, but this is not a fascist army. If anything, Antifa today fits that definition far better. It’s privately funded like the Brownshirts and Mussolini’s people. That’s what a fascist army actually is.
MAGAs: Anti-fascist movements are fascist, but Trump's actions which are actually fascist are not fascist.
I wish the US had a massive privately funded anti-fascist force. But we do not.
You must be paid well and given extra internet time from your apartment in China to be a schill, eh?
We do. It's called "Anybody who will shoot an antifa goon"
Rooftop Koreans.
Did you type this while wearing a che guevara t-shirt?
Explain how an elected congress and its administrator regaining control of DC as mandated in the constitution itself is fascist, you total fuckwit.
Very good points!
Whats wrong with fascism? Singapore practices fascism and it is the safest place in the world!
Singapore is not fascist. Were it fascist, it would follow with Mussolini’s ideas of everything within the state, nothing outside state, nothing against the state.
Singapore is fascist. Strict adherence to Mussolini's vision is not needed.
Words mean what I say they mean - doctor humpty dumpty
Fascim can bring low crime to those who are favored by the fascist government. It is everyone else who gets brutally suppressed.
If you are unable to understand the downsides of living in an authoritarian dictatorship, you are very much already lost.
I'll worry about the fascists I see them putting little boys in dresses and cutting off their dicks. Until then, I'm going to consider them an upgrade from the people who really are putting little boys in dresses and cutting off their dicks.
"5 things to know about FBI search of John Bolton’s home, office"
[...]
"Federal agents searched the home of former national security adviser John Bolton on Friday, targeting one of President Trump’s most outspoken critics..."
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5465989-bolton-trump-feud-fbi-search/
Yep, it's about TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, not about the fact that Bolton no longer holds any clearances and has not returned classified materials!
Nope! TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sevo, I assume you, like me, must be wondering "When did 'nobody is above the law' cease being the case?"
Are all those "TRUMP"s an effort to count all the classified documents that Trump stole, hid, lied about, and refused to return?
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to terminate $783 million in NIH grants linked to DEI initiatives
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/08/supreme-court-allows-trump-administration-to-terminate-783-million-in-nih-grants-linked-to-dei-initiatives/
In a four-paragraph order issued on Thursday afternoon, the court indicated that it was granting the government’s request to block the part of Young’s ruling that required NIH to continue to fund the terminated grants. Citing its decision in the Department of Education case, the court stated that the district court did not have the power to rule on claims “‘based on’ the research-related grants or to order relief designed to enforce any ‘obligation to pay money’ pursuant to those grants.” And, according to the court, the federal government would face “irreparable harm” if it paid the money for the grants and then was not able to recover that money.
KJBs dissent was special once again.
Gorsuchs opinion was fire. Smacking down activist judges.
The lower judges were following the law as it was. It was SCOTUS who re-wrote the law to favor Trump. It is all laid out in Jackson's dissent.
Jackson doesn't even know what a woman is and has to have other judges explain the most basic jurisprudence to her.
"Abrego Garcia has an ICE check-in this morning, under the conditions of his parole release. He has reportedly been taken into custody yet again by ICE. He has options, but all of them seem bad: take the Costa Rica deal, take the Uganda deal, or have his lawyers fight the Uganda deal. (The government implies it will deport him to Uganda as soon as Wednesday.) Each choice involves leaving his family behind in Maryland."
It would take a heart of stone to read this and not laugh.
""Why Uganda?" you might be wondering."
True. Why not South Sudan is my question?
It’s funnier this way.
I actually wasn't wondering "Why Uganda?", but that's probably my racist white privilege thinking that Uganda is as good a place as any and that other borders don't really matter.