This Trump Tariff Could Increase America's Trade Deficit
Switzerland might respond to Trump’s double-digit “reciprocal” tariff by canceling its multibillion-dollar F-35 order.

President Donald Trump's trade war has fractured America's relationship with much of the world, including historic trading partners like Switzerland.
In July, Trump imposed 39 percent tariffs on Switzerland—more than double the 15 percent rate to which its European Union neighbors are subjected—marking a sharp departure from the American-Swiss trading relationship. The tariffs went into effect last week on August 7. The average tariff rate that the U.S. subjected Swiss imports to was 2.21 percent in 2022 (the most recent year for which data are available), according to the World Bank. Switzerland's average tariff rate on American goods was even lower: a mere 0.52 percent. In January 2024, Switzerland abolished all industrial tariffs, resulting in 99.3 percent of American goods entering the country tariff-free, according to Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs.
Despite Switzerland's nearly completely laissez faire trading relationship with the U.S., Trump complained of a $41 billion deficit with Switzerland during an August 5 interview on CNBC's Squawk Box. (According to the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the American-Swiss goods deficit in 2024 was not quite that high: $38.3 billion.) However, this figure excludes trade of services between the two countries, which accounted for a trade surplus of $29.7 billion in favor of America. The total trade deficit, then, was approximately $8.6 billion, or 21 percent of Trump's inflated claim.
Trump has justified his tariffs against Switzerland on the American-Swiss trade deficit, but his policies have made this deficit worse since he took office in January. U.S. Census Bureau data show a nearly $48 billion goods deficit with Switzerland accumulated from January to June—390 percent greater than the January 2024–June 2024 deficit of $9.8 billion. (Trade in services data has not yet been published by the U.S. Trade Representative for 2025.)
By introducing volatility in global markets, Trump is partially responsible for widening the deficit in goods trade with Switzerland. The New York Times reports that "surging demand for gold in the United States as Mr. Trump threatened to upend the global trading order fueled a spike in Swiss gold imports," which are exempted from Trump's tariffs and account for two-thirds of recent Swiss exports to the United States. The next largest import is pharmaceuticals, which the Times explains "are temporarily excluded from U.S. import taxes while Mr. Trump considers imposing a sector-specific tariff."
Politico reports that Swiss lawmakers are considering canceling the country's order of 36 F-35 fighter jets, which would widen the goods deficit further. Switzerland entered the 6-billion-franc ($7.5 billion) deal in 2021, but was told by the U.S. in July that "additional costs to the original price tag will range between CHF650 million [$805 million] and CHF1.3 billion [$1.6 billion]" due to "higher material costs and inflation," according to swissinfo.ch. Fittingly enough, these higher material costs are partially attributable to Trump's tariffs, which he imposed on countries that export F-35 components to the U.S., like the U.K., Australia, the Netherlands, Canada, Italy, Denmark, and Norway.
Trump exacerbated the trade deficit with Switzerland by unintentionally encouraging Americans to hedge against economic instability with Swiss gold. Trump's 39 percent tariffs against Switzerland may very well increase the very deficit he seeks to reduce if Swiss lawmakers reduce or cancel their multibillion-dollar F-35 deal.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Potential ripples?
could!
According to Reason, every time it rains on me, it is Trump's fault.
By Friday, we should be reading articles about how Trump caused Erin.
Right - because the man never makes any mistakes, no errors in judgement, no bad ideas - and any, ANY, criticism of him - no matter how minor, no matter how merited - can only be attributed to TDS. He is literally a perfect human being in every respect. Can he please live forever and rule over us peons forever?
Inflation from 2021 caused by democrats and Biden abhorrent policies is Trump's fault?
There's no citation that the inflation noted for the planes has anything to do with Tariffs. This is at this time a baseless opinion.
The issue isn't Trump's mistakes and never really has been. The issue is that TDS sufferers will beat themselves over the head with a hammer until cutting their own dicks off in order to spite him sounds like a good idea and then try and convince other people to do the same. People who've been wearing "It will be a great day when our schools get all the money they need and the Air Force has to hold a bake sale to buy a bomber" t-shirts for 50 yrs. are coming out to say "Oh great! Because of Trump tariffs the DOD won't be able to sell the Swiss Air Force more fighter jets!"
Stop talking about Trump's tariffs! Only Democrat taxes come with a cost! Trump's taxes are magic! They don't cost anything! So stop it! Stooooooop!
No way will they cancel those jets. No way no how no tariffs.
But where am I going to get a knife with a cork screw?
You'll just have to pay the Trump Tax.
3-4 years of global inflation versus 1 week of tariffs. I bet it's all tariff's fault.
Oh, good, Jack Nicastro is as ignorant as Trump about what trade deficits are, and how utterly meaningless they are between two countries in a world of two hundred trading countries.
Full circle, I guess.
I am very certain that American companies that export their products understand the trade deficits and want to close them by selling more products which certainly is not meaningless to them.
American companies want to sell their products, but why would they care whether there's a trade surplus or deficit with their customer's country?
I'll talk to Martina Hingis about it.
Easiest way to prevent Swiss gold exports to the US is to encourage Americans to open Swiss bank accounts backed with either Swiss francs or gold.
Good job Orange Moron
Nothing in the article claims that Trump is trying to prevent Swiss gold exports. The author makes the case, poorly, that other tariffs have somehow increased demand for gold. That might be the case on the margins but increased demand for gold is coming from a lot of places outside the US and for a lot of different reasons. The price of gold doesn't tell us anything about it's utility. It reflects trust in fiat currencies and right now that trust is bottoming out. The degradation of the dollar has been going on for a lot longer than Trump has been in office. He can be totally wrong about Swiss tariffs but that has nothing to do with demand for gold.
Trump put a 39% tariff on Swiss gold bars. Gold is money and in particular it is international money that crosses borders. The reason Switzerland is a major banking center is because it transfers money across borders. The reason the BIS (Bank for International Settlements - the central bankers Central Bank - the institution that drives the accounting rules that banks around the world use) is located in Switzerland is because Switzerland is neutral and financially savvy and it doesn't throw its financial weight around.
What BIS did awhile ago (in response to 2008 and 2011) was declare that both sovereign debt and gold are Tier 1 assets for banks. Every other country made those rules effective a year or two ago. The US has never liked that rule because it allows competition with US dollar denominated debt and that is what allows global banks to denominate trade loans in dollars. The privilege of the reserve currency. But the US did adopt that accounting rule to be effective July 1st and now Trump thinks he can cripple gold and all nonUS banks.
Trump imposing a 39% tariff on gold bars is like imposing a 39% tax on Tbills. Whatever he may think he's doing, he is in fact declaring war on all foreign banks and on all interactions of them with domestic banks. He is using what he thinks is his/US power of the dollar to sanction the entire world trading system.
It will backfire in the ugliest possible way for the US. But at least it now becomes a bit clearer how the next financial crisis will unfold.
On August 11, DJT said gold would not be subject to tariffs. Gold closed 2.48% lower that same day.
Yes. Trump did not impose tariffs on gold. I'm not sure where this misinformation is coming from but even the article says "Mr. Trump threatened to upend the global trading order fueled a spike in Swiss gold imports," which are exempted from Trump's tariffs". Both you and the author are desperately trying to imply that Trump's trade deal with Switzerland has somehow disrupted the world gold trade. But it has nothing to do with gold. The author claims without any evidence whatsoever that a trade deal with Switzerland is the driving force behind the market for gold and you double down by claiming that Trump put a tariff on gold. The author is free to speculate on peripheral effects of Swiss tariffs but you are just lying about the facts.
Customs and Border Patrol issued a letter on July 31 to a Swiss refiner stating that 1kg and 100 oz gold bars would be subject to tariffs. Considering that the Swiss refiner would be indirectly an agent in paying any tariffs and CBP would collect said payments, those two sources are far more credible than what some orange baboon may or may not issue in response to today's news cycle.
Trade loans require certainty since they are usually made by syndicates of banks. If the loan is physical gold denominated, those refiners become the agent of payments. If gold can't be used for any trade loans that might involve a US bank, now or in future, that creates massive uncertainty. Because all it takes is for a Prez or a CBP agent to demand mordida in future.
Trump's purpose and m.o. is ALWAYS to create uncertainty and havoc in order to 'make a deal'. This behavior may work as some crappy NYC real estate tactic, but it WILL backfire and it will harm the US.
And BTW, I really don't give a shit what Boehm or Reason says about tariffs or free trade or their economic ideology either.
To be even more specific, the question asked by the refiners in that letter referred to specific 'Good Delivery' standards for Comex. Those are only used in the US. The standards used everywhere else are the LBMA (London) standards. About which no idiot has ever created an idea that such bars might be taxed. There have already been questions raised about whether the US even has gold in Fort Knox or whether US markets are physical gold or mere paper gold. Adding uncertainty to that mix is exactly what benefits Trump and cronies and harms everyone else.
August 11, Trump clarified that: no tariffs on gold. There was speculation beforehand that they would occur hence the price boost and consternation. You typed several paragraphs using obsolete information. Give yourself a gold star.
Trump's promises don't have a long life. He created uncertainty. When he finds an advantage to create another round of uncertainty, he will. He's achieved his objective of injecting uncertainty -that depends on him personally to 'fix' - into say a five year gold denominated trade loan.
The stuff from CBP and the Swiss refiner (PAMP) and the FT was not mere speculation. It was a consequence of how he executed orders and manages things. Where people like you can always excuse the actions of those who execute his orders as 'speculation'
You used obsolete information and wrote several paragraphs using something that had been superseded.
It came off like a lazy weatherman using the forecast from 3 days earlier saying it will be sunny all day with smug indigence while it is raining outside. Feel free to waste more of your time on a few more paragraphs defensing a hill that does not exist. Actually, write 30 paragraphs about the gold tariffs that don’t exist. That would be swell.
There is a reason why separation of powers works.
And why all power in one man's hands doesn't.
You don't understand any of that do you
"Trump exacerbated the trade deficit with Switzerland by unintentionally encouraging Americans to hedge against economic instability with Swiss gold."
Well spot gold is up 75% over the last five years and at least 50% of that increase happened during the Biden administration so hedging inflated fiat dollars isn't exactly a Trump phenomenon. There is no tariff on Swiss gold and gold doesn't care about other tariffs. It cares about inflation and asset risk. And nobody has to buy Swiss gold anyway. They don't have a monopoly on metal.
And remember:
In 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 6102, which effectively made it illegal for most Americans to own gold.
And remember: in 1971 Nixon defaulted on the national gold debt. And remember: that inflation exploded for 2 decades thereafter.
The inflation caused by Covid and abhorrent democrat policies can't be now labelled as cost increases caused by Tariffs. Sorry but you are conflating one into the other but they are not the same.
Just like over 85% of products traded between Canada and the US are not included in Trump's tariffs there's most likely agreements in place for the components of the jets being purchased.
Please cite actual evidence of your opinion.
Can someone with at least a triple-digit IQ explain to me how a surplus *or deficit* of government-owned fighter jets sold to another country's government is in any way related to free trade?
I've tried everything shy of beating myself retarded with a sack of doorknobs and I'm just not seeing the libertarian upshot here. It's like the time Trump offered cuts to military spending in exchange for border legislation and got a "Fuck you!" in reply. So... you want more military spending, interventionism, and/or war... *and* the same or more illegal immigration? *That's* your position?
So, wait, where does Jack stand on the F-35 production?
AFAICT, "It's been a big waste of taxpayer dollars that we should do more of in order to facilitate global trade and maintain good economic relations with Switzerland."
That or it hasn't been a waste of taxpayer dollars and we should still allow US military contractors to sell fighter jets to neutral European governments because of free trade... or something.
In case any MAGA sheeple here don't understand how tariffs work. They are paid by the companies that import the products into the United States. A lot of MAGA sheeple are cheering because these companies are currently eating the cost of the tariffs rather than passing on the cost to the consumer. However, the way that they are doing this is by cutting staff hours, eliminating benefits, using shoddier materials, etc. Not sure how that is making America great.