Show Patrol
Plus: Zohran Mamdani courts the "it" crowd, Mexican cartel deal, shutting down microschools, and more...

A glorified photo op: About a dozen National Guard members took a stroll around Washington D.C.'s National Mall yesterday as the sun set. Other troops deployed around monuments elsewhere, and some could be found at a U.S. Park Police facility in Anacostia.
"We just did a presence patrol to be amongst the people, to be seen," Master Sgt. Cory Boroff told The New York Times.
But it wasn't just showmanship. Federal agents—including those with the Drug Enforcement Administration and the FBI—working in conjunction with Metropolitan Police Department officers (who have been temporarily placed under federal control) made 23 arrests on Monday night. That total, per Director Kash Patel, included "one arrest on a search warrant for a prior murder charge" and "multiple outstanding warrants for DUI." It's not totally clear how many arrests were made yesterday or if these figures are in addition to standard arrests made by D.C. cops, which have been averaging 68 arrests per day. (Also, arrests are different than convictions; these folks must still wend their way through the court system.)
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
By day yesterday, Mayor Muriel Bowser met with Attorney General Pam Bondi and other administration officials, seemingly focused on how to best partner and use the federal support. By night, Bowser was back to her critical tone, calling the president's actions an "authoritarian push" and saying in a town hall that Trump seeing homeless encampments "triggers something in him that has him believing that our very beautiful city is dirty, which it is not."
"I worry about this, because we spend a lot of time and resources trying to get the people who are in encampments into shelter, and they present with a lot of issues that make them not want to go into shelter," she continued; but White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has been clear that homeless people may either access such services or else be "susceptible to fines or to jail time."
"We are not 700,000 scumbags and punks," Bowser said. "We don't have neighborhoods that should be bulldozed. We have to be clear about our story, who we are and what we want for our city." Bowser took to X to emphasize how "violent crime in DC is at its lowest level in 30 years."
Violent crime in DC is at its lowest level in 30 years.
We had an unacceptable spike in 2023, so we changed our laws and strategies. Now, crime levels are not only down from 2023, but from before the pandemic.
Our tactics are working, and we aren't taking our foot off the gas. pic.twitter.com/UHpCT8RDPG
— Mayor Muriel Bowser (@MayorBowser) August 12, 2025
But just two days ago, Bowser was trying to split the difference:
While Mayor Bowser calls Trump's takeover of DC police "unsettling and unprecedented," she says "the fact that we have more law enforcement and presence in neighborhoods…that may be positive."
— Philip Melanchthon Wegmann (@PhilipWegmann) August 11, 2025
And this is all a bit of a departure from Bowser's messaging, which for the last year up until a few days ago had been…a bit tougher on crime than much of the City Council's (which isn't saying all that much). But now, it's showmanship all the way down: She appears to be trying to publicly position herself as a #Resistance figure while also accepting federal help.
"But DC's crime is falling!" is a terrible response to Trump's takeover. DC's homicide rate was five times New York's last year, and we're optimistic that this year, it will fall to merely 3x. As a matter of political strategy and moral correctness, it is better to acknowledge…
— Megan McArdle (@asymmetricinfo) August 12, 2025
To some degree, Bowser and Leavitt—as well as the president himself—are conflating crime and quality-of-life issues. Is the intention, with the deployment of federal force, to get the specific carjacking crime wave under control? Or is it to curb crime more broadly? Or is it to clean up homeless encampments and make the city less dirty?
It all reminds me of the cleanup of San Francisco in advance of Xi Jinping coming to town. Prior to hosting the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Summit in 2023 (and a meeting between then–President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping), state and city leaders took it upon themselves to clear homeless encampments, power-wash the sidewalks, and ramp-up law enforcement, leading many San Francisco residents to wonder why Xi deserves such special treatment but they must be subjected to living in perpetual dereliction. It was all for show, but it also made the issue politically salient for a moment and proved to San Franciscans that a cleaner, better-functioning city was possible. Of course, the effects didn't really last—dealing with homelessness long-term is a lot harder than moving the homeless people temporarily out of sight—but it's possible it had a lasting political effect.
But the situation in D.C. is, in many ways, different: The real issue here is whether this is an appropriate use of executive power, and whether it will be an effective means of getting the problems under control. But it's an interesting moment because it's forcing Democratic politicians to decide whether they're going to become crime denialists or not and how exactly they want to position themselves going forward.
Scenes from New York: This is kind of a funny read (from May) because—despite being a young person in New York—I don't really know many of these names dropped who are allegedly part of the "it" crowd that endorsed Zohran Mamdani. Ella Emhoff (Kamala Harris' stepdaughter)? That's the best you can do? If this is the youthmentum, I'm not buying that it's very strong (especially without the Dimes Square set, which is more inclined to talk Curtis Yarvin than Frantz Fanon).
Relatedly: I don't have an issue with these people's ages, but I do have an issue with them coming from the Democratic Socialists of America.
Mamdani's policies were written by 28/34 yo DSAs. Few in his inner circle ever worked in government. And the person he charged to hire his city hall team is a California native.
This is who we're getting to run the top financial capital in the world and the largest school… pic.twitter.com/q3yC0fsXUj
— Yiatin Chu (@ycinnewyork) August 12, 2025
QUICK HITS
- "Mexico sent 26 high-ranking cartel figures to the United States Tuesday in the latest major deal with the Trump administration as American authorities ratchet up pressure on criminal networks smuggling drugs across the border," reports the Associated Press.
- Really good Just Asking Questions episode (if I may say so myself) with Rob Henderson, the guy who popularized the phrase luxury beliefs:
- "China Evergrande Group's delisting marks a bleak milestone for the nation's property sector, now in a fourth year of paralysis that continues to weigh down the world's second-largest economy," reports Bloomberg. "The company, once China's biggest developer by sales, will be removed from the Hong Kong stock exchange on Aug. 25, a year and a half after the shares were suspended and almost 16 years after the Guangzhou-based firm was listed."
- "The White House plans to conduct a far-reaching review of Smithsonian museum exhibitions, materials and operations ahead of America's 250th anniversary," reports The Wall Street Journal. White House officials said they'll expect exhibits to emphasize "unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story" and will audit accordingly.
- What would we do without the state?
I can't imagine the horrors happening inside a private home school that violated Palo Alto city code. God forbid they were learning calculus.
Pray for these children. pic.twitter.com/Z8SkoQwmP6
— Katherine Boyle (@KTmBoyle) August 11, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Scenes from Squirtlandia
Apparently KAR’s stomping ground has a problem with human feces being left around town by douchesters. Color me not surprised. If this works out well, maybe next year they’ll have something clever for needle park.
https://thatoregonlife.com/2025/03/portland-oregon-public-litter-boxes/
That’s some funny shit right there.
To quote the India psa, you have to poo in the lou
Lunchbox for sqrlsy.
He gets fed and medicated all in one session. Will give him more time to update his website.
I don't see how this goes better than the SF public toilets. Those were used primarily by junkies for years and now have full time crews manning them to keep them usable by those who are not homeless junkies.
The article includes the price tag for trying to deal with Portlandouchesters pooping all over public spaces. Looks like $1.26M each, excluding those additional overhead costs.
Are they at least using that color changing litter to detect health issues?
*Automated Voice* We have detected from your fecal matter that your fentanyl level is too low, please take these complementary "harm reduction" needles and foil.
Anyone who’s had an addict in their life knows from first hand experience that person has to make a dedicated decision to fight that addiction, every minute of every hour of every day, and follow through with it.
Sometimes even the ones who manage to successfully maintain sobriety have slidebacks and have to reorient themselves. That goes double for people who use nuclear-tier narcotics, especially in all these states that now view drug addiction like it's something to brag about.
Agreed even quitting cigarettes' is the same.
So quitting for 48 hours doesn't fix things? Asking for a Maine based commenter here.
$1.26 M per each poop?
It might end up that way if each unit is only used once. I don’t have faith that the Portlandouchesters will embrace using these.
Great website. I spotted an article that Sarc should check out to better understand how the economy actually works.
https://thatoregonlife.com/2025/08/nation-agrees-4-99-costco-chicken-only-thing-preventing-total-economic-collapse/
Freedom from bathrooms is a primary freedom.
When you’re out tooling around the neighborhood on your fixie and in a time crunch to get back home to catch the latest cartoon showing a tiny penis, sometimes nature calls. So douchester just takes a shit anywhere. Mr. Smug ain’t got time to find a restroom.
Hey, Chumby, Seattle's real life is better than your puns... Seattle has a homeless camp in a park called... *takes deep breath* Bhy Kracke Park. Not joking.
Doesn’t sound like they had a cracking good time.
They are just mething with us at this point.
Competing with San Francisco and New Delhi for first place in Olympic Street Shitting.
If you look at cities worldwide, I'd bet that street shitting is the rule more than the exception.
Only if you include India and parts of Africa. I’m sure if you exclude India, street shitting goes into the minority.
They say this is part of a smear campaign.
They need to wipe these rumors off the internet.
So the parts of the world where most people live. I think it's not uncommon in mainland China either.
So this is what we've come to; $1.2 million dollar* litterboxes.
And now every otherkin furry is going to want one in their school or place of employment now.
* I'd like to see that broken down, and how much is going to a consulting firm performing the environmental impact study
They might not even get used by the squatters.
$2.1 million to “partner with local artists” to paint the units in “non-threatening tones.”
There are 10 units, so they paid $210,000 each to paint them. Fucking ridiculous.
What are the odds every one of these "artists" has a qualifying connection such as antifa member or relative of a city government employee?
A glorified photo op: About a dozen National Guard members took a stroll around Washington D.C.'s National Mall yesterday as the sun set.
It's not a photo op if you don't hold up the Holy Bible.
Ahem, finger guns would like a word
The ballgazer OK symbol beats finger guns.
Bowser is a delusional cunt, news at 9:47!
10:03 update: Yep, still a delusional cunt
On Monday, she's a cunt, on Tuesday, she's a cunt
On Wednesday through Saturday, she's a cunt
Then on Sunday, just to be different
She's a super King Kamehameha cu-unt
But on Friday she's in love. If only there is a "cure" for her cuntyness
Cop a Feel?
British cops don jogging suits to crack down on catcalling women joggers.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14994179/Undercover-police-officers-pose-joggers-catcalling.html
Guess this generation of statist doesn’t know about page 3.
Shrike states this is police harassment as the constabulary in Dog Dick, Georgia intervene whenever he does this towards pre-teens.
G'day mistress, do ye fancy a shag
It will be halarious when a muzzi rapes one of them and they are not allowed to arrest it.
As long as they don’t catcall before, and feel bad afterwards, it’s ok for immigrants to rape white girls.
And the Crown's government will cover it up for years.
Accept the cultural enrichment like a good Brit or get fired for racism for complaining or arresting the diversity angels.
Lay back and think of mother mecca
The Rapefugees can't help themselves if it's hot out.
/German judges
Sometimes they only jack off on their gang-rape victims.
How are feminist groups reacting?
Today? They are currently protesting against Israel and clashing with Polizei. Video available on LiveLeak.
The Pakis aren't the funny part. The funny part is that women hate catcalling by unattractive men, but hate it even more when attractive men ignore them. When these valiant officers get ignored by the top 10%, it will crush them.
Long Story Short? Charge (but not too fast)!
This electric SUV set a world record for longest journey on a single charge... here's how far it went
A new Polestar 3 Long Range Single Motor was driven 581.3 miles on UK roads, 143 miles more than a single charge should take it.
And the unmodified, large SUV's real-world journey – which took 22 hours and 57 minutes – has been officially recognised by the Guinness Book of World Records.
Driven by professional efficiency drivers Sam Clarke, Kevin Booker and Richard Parker, the Polestar 3 - which starts from just shy of £70,000
At this point they're just fucking with the "I know an exception to the average!" people.
So 581 miles at 25 MPH? I doubt that would be legal anywhere in the US.
I could find a lovely scenic route where you can do that (other than doing laps in town somewhere). The only places with posted minimum speed limits are divided highways, as far as I know.
08055 has 25 mph speed limits everywhere.
I have 3 drivers available now. None are "professional efficiency drivers". All of us and our gear to go anywhere we would go on vacation doesn't fit in a Polestar 3 and, even if it did, the Polestar 3 costs ~$20K more than what we've got... and would *still* add 3 days to our vacation (or take 3 days of relaxation out of our vacation).
Average speed of 25 mph. About the same as a rider in the tour de france.
But they have to stop to eat at some point during a 23 hour ride, presumably. So if you have to travel 600 miles in a day, this is better than training as an elite cyclist and then biking the journey.
If they stopped in Portland, they could just shit anywhere.
Maybe you missed the "Driven by professional efficiency drivers Sam Clarke, Kevin Booker and Richard Parker" part.
It is/was almost certainly a 24 hour road rally sort of effort.
'We have to ask: is that person going to escalate? Are they a sexual offender? We want to manage that risk early.'
The fridge protects the snacks.
https://youtube.com/shorts/hQzXhzJd86U?si=ZzjzUk1eJBTWFh1D
Palin and Cleese classic
The most shocking part of thr article is the photo. That's who gets catcalled in the UK?
A 4 in say Sweden or Mexico is like a 9 in the UK. Perhaps like shopping at a market where you want a poblano pepper: you take the best one they have unless it is moldy or rotting.
This is how I feel about New Jersey.
Next week they'll trot out the tranny "female" constable and fine anyone who doesn't catcall.
You’ve been reading the code in the matrix again, haven’t you.
According to LBC, the two female undercover cops were 'targeted within minutes' by a man in a large truck who 'honked at them and made gestures out the window'.
So most herd animals, large ungulates, and even many predators are repelled by such actions. There is one animal that can and does respond aggressively to honking the horn and gesturing obnoxiously.
Relatedly, if you ever hear the question "Alone in the woods with a bear or a man?", hippos and cows reliably kill more people every year than any three of lions, tigers, bears, sharks, pythons, alligators, and crocodiles combined.
Muslim neighborhoods hardest hit.
By day yesterday, Mayor Muriel Bowser met with Attorney General Pam Bondi and other administration officials, seemingly focused on how to best partner and use the federal support.
Take credit if it works; scapegoat if it doesn't.
Put just asking questions on rumble. If it's safe for you tube it's party line bull shit.
...Trump seeing homeless encampments "triggers something in him that has him believing that our very beautiful city is dirty, which it is not."
Unless those encampments have gold bathroom fixtures, Trump isn't going to see the city as beautiful.
Scenes from New York:
If you have any brains at all, the only scene of New York would be in your rear view mirror.
Or a scene from an ittalian restaurant.
Maybe a bottle of red. Or a bottle of white.
Or grain alcohol for the sarc remix.
Ohh things are okay with me these days
Got a new box, got an ex wife
and the daughters disowned...
Yup. Had posted a number of rapefugee stories from NYC in an effort to have SfNY sunset from the Roundup. Will need to double the efforts.
We had an unacceptable spike in 2023, so we changed our laws and strategies. Now, crime levels are not only down from 2023, but from before the pandemic.
Would the strategies include different reporting thresholds by any chance?
and not prosecuting at all
Heck in areas of California many crimes are now only reportable online. in other words yea the police know about it but will not come out or do anything else. crime reduced, therefore Newsom is now closing prisons
Hell, you'd think SOMEBODY would be mentioning the union's allegations of superiors intentionally demanding they write out the case reports on much lower crimes.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dc-police-union-head-tells-why-he-doubts-city-crime-statistics/ar-AA1KpagW?ocid=BingNewsSerp
It has been noted it defies logic for murder to be basically unchanged but "violent crime" has dropped tremendously. Makes zero sense at all.
https://babylonbee.com/news/democrat-mayors-report-violent-crime-down-40-since-they-redefined-violent-and-crime
Democrat Mayors Report Violent Crime Down 40% Since They Redefined ‘Violent’ And ‘Crime’
U.S. — Despite claims by President Donald Trump that American cities are being overrun by criminals, Democrat mayors across the country reported that violent crime was actually down 40% since they redefined the words "violent" and "crime."
Trump vowed to clean up America's streets, starting with ordering the National Guard into action to bolster law enforcement efforts in Washington, D.C., eliciting an outcry from mayors who pointed to a sharp drop in crimes now that the definition of crime had been completely changed.
"There's actually almost no crime when you look at it a certain way," said D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser. "Ever since we determined that the word ‘violent' shouldn't include murders, rapes, assaults, or armed robberies and the word ‘crime' doesn't really have anything to do with committing acts that violate the law, we've seen a noticeable drop in violent crime. Trump is just trying to scare everyone into accepting his dictatorial rule."
Analysts admitted that redefining what words mean has had a significant impact on the data, with almost no homicides being committed since the definition of the word "homicide" was modified to exclude human lives taken by other humans. "Crime has virtually disappeared in parts of the country. That's going by the new definition of ‘crime,' of course."
"In fact," Mayor Bowser continued, "if acts of violent assault are called ‘loving' and breaking the law is referred to as ‘kindness,' then we've actually seen a huge spike in loving kindness in our city. So there."
At publishing time, Democrats were reportedly working on redefining the word "law" to now mean "oppressive" and the word "order" to mean "fascism."
Photo Copportunity
That story regarding the former Tennessee police officer suing fellow cops over grooming on the job has taken a ruff turn.
https://x.com/ObviousRises/status/1951032897487642737/photo/1
Why is there a dog in the picture? And how does Big Akita feel about this?
Still waiting for a picture of the wife before I form an opinion.
That was my question until the K9 officer showed up in that photo. Now I’ve got something more interesting to hound journalists covering this story over.
Keep dogging them persistently until they answer.
Can he also groom the bears in trunks?
Asking for Chemjeff Retarded Statist?
What is this thing about bears in trunks?
The most idiotic analogy ever crafted.
Naturally it came from Chemjeff.
He was comparing not being Covid mRNA "vaccinated" to driving around with a bear in your trunk if I remember rightly.
https://reason.com/podcast/2021/10/25/freedom-responsibility-and-coronavirus-policy/?comments=true#comment-9176512
Yeah, that was a stupid analogy!
One of the funny parts is that those comments are not closed.
Another funny part is that Lying Jeffy insisted for months, every time it got brought up, that it was a good analogy.
After reading his posts on that other site (Fark?), he was making sloppy analogies there too where some members called him out for that. Iirc, those posts were about a decade old. You could the genesis of his sloppy bears in trunks analogy.
Personally, the cake is pretty standard fare relative to the fact that RFK Jr. actually put a bear in the trunk of his car.
Don't get me wrong, the cake is good, but the fact that "bear" is number 3 on the list of most interesting dead things found in a Kennedy's car cannot be topped.
"Why is there a dog in the picture?"
Why is there a dog in the picture?
...Why is there a dog in the picture?
Maybe she likes it doggystyle.
Yes, but why is there a dog in the picture?
Perhaps he is one of the alleged abusers after she told him, “Keep your paws off me” and he continued.
I bet she ****** that poor dog in ***** and the ***** and also the *****.
Shepherd dog more based than an akita. Who knew?
Mamdani's policies were written by 28/34 yo DSAs.
Well, at least his plank won't include gendered language.
Edit; Wrong place.
They should be named the pro-North Korea DSA.
Which they are.
Oh no! A ccp firm is going under! Good.
Tariff ripples strike again.
https://www.wsj.com/tech/tech-startups-hiring-us-workers-30f70207?mod=hp_lista_pos1
No More Offshore. Startups Look to Spend and Hire in U.S. Due to Trump Tax Change
Faster deductions make adding staff cheaper when cash flow is critical, executives say
Tech startups are dusting off U.S. hiring plans after Congress revived a popular tax deduction—and the same change could drive domestic hiring more broadly as well, executives and tax professionals say.
Finta, a San Francisco-based tax-and-accounting software startup with fewer than a dozen employees, plans to fill five positions, including software engineers, in the U.S. instead of abroad by the end of the year, founder Andy Wang said. “The change makes domestic R&D far more attractive.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/u-s-stocks-rally-toward-record-highs-after-better-than-expected-inflation-data/ar-AA1KoM84
The U.S. stock market is rallying toward records on Tuesday after data suggested inflation across the country was a touch better last month than economists expected.
The S&P 500 rose 1.1% and was on track to top its all-time high set two weeks ago. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 473 points, or 1.1%, as of 2:46 p.m. Eastern time, while the Nasdaq composite was 1.3% higher and also heading toward a record.
Stocks got a lift from hopes that the better-than-expected inflation report will give the Federal Reserve leeway to cut interest rates at its next meeting in September.
Lower rates would give a boost to investment prices and to the economy by making it cheaper for U.S. households and businesses to borrow to buy houses, cars or equipment. President Donald Trump has angrily been calling for cuts to help the economy, often insulting the Fed's chair personally while doing so.
https://www.wsj.com/business/ge-appliances-plans-3-billion-u-s-investment-to-help-blunt-tariffs-e07b1e73?mod=hp_lead_pos11
GE Appliances Plans $3 Billion U.S. Investment to Help Blunt Tariffs
Chinese-owned maker of refrigerators and stoves will add 1,000 jobs across five states
GE Appliances said it plans to invest $3 billion to expand and modernize its U.S. factories over the next five years, helping to blunt the effects of tariffs by reshoring some work now done in China and Mexico.
The appliance maker, owned by China-based Haier Smart Home, said the money will go into factories in South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia and Alabama. A previously announced project, the $490 million expansion of a washing-machine factory in the company’s home base of Louisville, Ky., is also part of the total.
Wait just a fucking second. I thought we were told reshoring was unpossible and couldn't be done because Americans won't work in factories, and that Trump's tariffs won't make companies reshore factories and jobs. Were the trolls and assholes wrong? Be still my heart.
Mexico sent 26 high-ranking cartel figures to the United States Tuesday in the latest major deal with the Trump administration...
Their drugs are about to be tariffed into oblivion!
A stupid question, why don’t we just arrest these high-ranking cartel figures as soon as they get here? It would be damned easy with them here, on US soil and in one place.
MAYBE THEY'LL ARREST TRUMP!
The walls are closing in!
But due process!
Quick! Get sarc to his fainting couch/cardboard box!
They're being extradited to the US.
Thanks. That wasn’t fully explained in the blurb.
They're already arrested. They're coming to the US to stand trial.
Pardon me for being a little retarded and not getting the joke either.
I love this comment. It made me smile. Mostly because of QBs typical dipshit response. He can't resist proving he is Mike.
I think it was serious question.
The blurb here was vague and someone not already familiar with the story might not know it was an extradition.
Lol, perfect.
....
Humor is wasted on the dim witted.
I guess so. So explain the joke to me...because I still see no humor there.
I really don't get the hostility to QB. Yeah, he's more of a doctrinaire libertarian than a lot are on here, but it's OK for people to disagree.
Thanks Zeb. I think your analysis of me is dead on.
If by doctrinaire you mean cosplaying democrat, sure. He plays the same role as Jeff. He couches DNC narratives in a veneer of libertarian arguments.
This year he has backed:
Raising taxes (anti BBB using deficit argument solely built off not raising taxes)
Against DOGE audits
For inferior court judicial TROs
Pro open borders and their funding
Meanwhile he sea lions and only questions non leftist narratives.
A good example is the other day when he tried questioning mRNA build up in hearts. Instead tried a well actually it is more than hearts to dispute it.
He is pro funding of 60% overhead from federal grants as another example, defending the largesse multiple times. Pro USAID. Anti every cut.
I don't think you analysis is accurate.
It is.
Another glaring example.
2 weeks ago he was using the same DNC gaslighting that nobody on the left was upset over the Sidney sweeny AE add.
His views are 100% consistent with democrat policies. Find me a single example of him criticizing democrats.
Which analysis do you think is incorrect? When has he supported anything under Trump or criticized anything on the left.
Same exact behaviors as shrike, jeff, sarc, and others.
DUDE!
Show us where. I never said a thing about Sydney Sweeny. I don't even know what the controversy is about. I never looked in to the story because I don't care and I sure never commented about it.
I believe the term for which you seek is CUCLL.
Collectivist Undercover Cosplaying Liberal Libertine. CUCLL.
I coined this.
I don't think it's necessarily "cosplaying". There are lots of libertarians that fit in that space (assuming "liberal" in a more classical sense). Maybe they are wrong or irrelevant, but that doesn't make them secret democrats.
They might be libertarian/libertine on a single or select few issues; the criticism of several of the editors here. Not saying “each every all” but the trend here and on the outside is that Team D and those that carry HO2 for them does not align with core little “l” principles.
One example is the murder of Ashli Babbitt. She was unarmed and civil trespassing on public property. It happened to coincide with when Otto Penn the First was being coronated. Sarc and White Mike in particular defended the LEO that shot her. There are neocons that defended that too and possibly others. They might agree with legal marijuana (though some support extra taxes and/or a govt regulatory body which isn’t libertarian imo) and say legal prostitution. But the NAP is foreign to them.
Sarc and White Mike in particular defended the LEO that shot her.
Just to clarify, that was the real Mike, not me.
What makes them left-propagandists is noting they do not apply to the left the same principles they criticize the right for breaking. If they were in fact libertarians this would occur naturally, completely without effort. But in reality they ignore, minimize, and defend the left's failures while inventing, exaggerating, and catastrophizing the right's failures.
For example when The 1619 Project dropped all of their comments defended it, attacking anyone who criticized it or it's creators.
In reality jeffsarc are left wingers criticizing their enemies from a libertarian perspective because this is a libertarian site. But they obviously don't believe the principles they use to do so.
Good summary.
And they are dishonest in their biases.
Would respect the more if they were honest about their actions.
Most of us they, yes this includes Qb, call Trump cultists have criticized Trump many times but are also honest that we dislike almost everything the DNC stands for. Sarc and Mike will never admit they have biases. Hence the cosplay term.
It's odd this group (Zeb, QB) accepts without objection the jeffsarc framing of you and others as Trumpists which presumably means not-libertarian. But somehow when the same analysis is used to characterize jeffsarc as not libertarian they frame the entire process as illegitimate.
Why the difference? Left Wing Privilege. Because virtually all of us come of age in institutions committed to advancing left wing extremism they internalize that perfect evidence is necessary to even mildly criticize the left. By contrast it's open season on you since you're just a fascist who needs to be driven out By Any Means Necessary.
I will engage with anyone here on the merits of what they are saying. Mostly I will stay out of the personal crap, but I guess today is an exception. I don't know if I've ever called anyone a "Trumpist", but if I have, it's not (generally) a dismissal of them. I'm not an anti-Trumpist. I like a lot of what he's done. Anyone can see that some people on here are strong Trump supporters and some are less so. That doesn't mean they (either way) are necessarily not libertarian or that I have a big problem with that. I have actual friends who are pretty optimistic about Trump and I will argue, but I don't hold it against them. SO please don't assume you know my motivations. In this comment section, I'm generally just interested in debate, humor and hearing differing views from those on here who I consider worth listening to (and if I respond to you in any substantive way, then you are part of that group, even if I often disagree).
Jesse and I not getting along goes way back and has nothing to do with Sarc or Jeff, both of whom have always been friendly to me. There's quite a few Trump supporters here that have always been nice to me as well.
As for me, I'm sure there's a few here I've call Trumpists. Is that an insult? All of my friends and family are Trump supporters (none claim to be libertarians) and I have no animosity toward Trump supporters. I was excited when Trump was elected over Kamala anticipating all the good things like gutting the deep state and thinking the tariffs would be limited similar to Trump 1.0, but it has been seriously disappointing.
I'm sure there's a few here I've call Trumpists. Is that an insult?
This is irrelevant. First "insult" isn't the right term. Is being called a leftist an "insult"?
But I didn't claim you called him a Trumpist so your meaning isn't relevant. I claimed you didn't object when sarc did and sarc clearly sees this as a damning label. This parallels the fact that I see being a leftist (with all the obviously wrong beliefs that entails) as damning.
So why are you motivated to protect sarc from this label when sarc freely labels others? It makes even less sense to respond that labeling someone a Trumpist isn't a big deal because then the justification to protect sarc means even less.
For example when The 1619 Project dropped all of their comments defended it, attacking anyone who criticized it or it's creators.
Well that's a fucking lie. I never once defended that. It was bullshit from the get-go. You need to quote me defending it (which you can't because no such comments exist) or apologize for being a piece of shit liar (which you can't because you're pathological).
You really are human garbage. I pity your family and coworkers. I'd say I pity your friends too but you don't have any.
Oops. Moved because this was meant to be a reply to Marshal.
You need to quote me defending it (which you can't because no such comments exist) or apologize for being a piece of shit liar (which you can't because you're pathological).
Notice the difference in demands. When sarc lied that I defended tariffs he claimed it was idiotically unreasonable to expect a quote or reference. But when he's criticized a quote or reference is perfectly reasonable. This happens because sarc has no standards, if you are on his team nothing is wrong and if you're not nothing is correct. That's the entire extent of his analysis.
You really are human garbage.
Compare how he treats others to how he criticizes others for treating him. People mock him with "Ideas" because he pretends to want to discuss them. But he's always engaged in personal attacks and schoolyard insults to everyone else because the implied standard of sticking to ideas is a cudgel to criticize others, never a universal principle applied to himself or his allies.
Svetlana, bear found meat cache.
Wait now. Who are you trying to say supported the 1619 project?
All I'm seeing here is a lot of commenters that have a lot of other commenters jumbled up in their memory and attributing positions to them they've never held.
I have frequently criticized the left, especially Biden and Obama. Those comments get no attention and are quickly forgotten. It's only when someone gets critical of the right, especially Trump that things heat up and that's all that goes in the memory banks.
Then we have Jesse routinely lying about things people like me have said. How many people here really think I'm Mike because of him? I'm not. Jesse knows it. He knows my real identity.
Who are you trying to say supported the 1619 project?
That was Jeff, although as I said both of them defend the left by attacking anyone criticizing them. He would never give the game away by coming out fully in support, his contribution is as a protector. But he called anyone criticizing it a racist and lied about it it as much as he could without permanently damaging his credibility. I think he misjudged that last bit, it's hard to understand how people think outside a bubble you're inside.
All I'm seeing here is a lot of commenters that have a lot of other commenters jumbled up in their memory
That's why we mockingly call them jeffsarc. There's no real difference between people playing the same role. One may choose to engage more on a particular issue or even be busy that day. But abstracted one level they perform the same function across the entire set of political issues. You'll also notice they literally never criticize each other's ideas or even other Team Blue members like Molly. This is revealing because when pressed they will advance generic criticisms of the left, but somehow these never come up when unabashed leftists make them. In hundreds of thousands of comments each neither has ever made one none which conflicts with this framework.
The key is recognizing the flip. For example sarc hates cops and interprets every action as hostile to them as possible, except when one kills a protester on the right. Then the cop's a hero. Similarly he asserts people who cheer death (referring to Palestinians) are garbage humans, except when he does it. He hates whataboutism, except when it was his prime tactic to defend Dem spending during the Obama and Biden administrations. He claims those who engage in personal attacks are garbage humans, but he's made them for decades and doesn't seem to think they reflect on him at all.
Every standard flips perfectly consistently with who it would justify criticizing.
You weren’t around during Obama. Or Biden.
Unless you were White Knight Mike Liarson
You weren’t around during Obama. Or Biden.
I was here for most or all of Biden's administration with the same username.
Thank you for the detailed response, Marshal.
Do you have an example of his classical liberalism? I have seen zero divergence from the DNC or corporate media in his posts. Defends covid, against every Trump action, dismisses things democrats too, won't even credit Trump for peace deals.
I have CNN be more neutral than him.
Classic Liberalism?
I have argued ad nauseam against tariffs. I favor free markets. I'm a pro 2A gun owner. I oppose labor unions, government subsidies, Obamacare, lockdowns, mask mandates and censorship. I'm a free speech absolutist and nearly always side with individuals over the state including self defense and the castle doctrine. I am a constitutional originalist. I'm anti-war. I'm anti-drugwar and opposed to laws against victimless crimes. I oppose using soldiers as police and the militarization of police. I am a very vocal supporter of the 4th amendment, jury nullification and perhaps most of all limiting the power of the imperial presidency which I think will be the end of our republic.
I've been a Ron Paul libertarian since about 2000.
And yes, I hate Donald Trump, not for who he is, but for what he is.
QB seems pretty consistently classically liberal to me. I think you are over-interpreting comments in some cases or conflating him with other commenters.
And why would anyone pretend to be a libertarian?
And why would anyone pretend to be a libertarian?
If you're a leftist how can you turn libertarians against the right? If you're honest you have to admit you don't support any of the principles libertarians care about either.
I guess if they think they can get that 3% for democrats that could make sense. Still seems like a weak strategy. Convincing libertarians of anything en-masse is like herding cats and no one knows what the fuck we're talking about anyway.
I asked in which manner because I see none of it. The base of all his arguments are in democrat narratives with a veneer of classical liberalism, done primarily by dismissing any parts of the argument that mar the veneer.
For example, how is defending fed funded grants woth 60% overhead classically liberal?
How is defending the government response to covid as recently as last week classically liberal?
Even on tariffs and the economy he only claims no tariffs but as soon as you show him tariffs from other countries he shrugs his shoulders as no big deal, again not classically liberal. As the argument is solely one sided against one actor, the US.
How is being against all audits, supporting judicial supremacy, etc classically liberal?
So provide me an example of a pure classical liberal argument he had made.
For example, how is defending fed funded grants woth 60% overhead classically liberal?
I never did. I said even those of us funded by NIH grants complain about the 60% overhead.
How is defending the government response to covid as recently as last week classically liberal?
I never did. I was pointing out flaws in a study on vaccines because it was a crappy study. There was no defense of COVID policies, just trying to keep you honest.
Even on tariffs and the economy he only claims no tariffs but as soon as you show him tariffs from other countries he shrugs his shoulders as no big deal, again not classically liberal. As the argument is solely one sided against one actor, the US.
That's 100% classic liberal as all the Austrian economists favor not responding to foreign tariffs by punishing your own citizens.
How is being against all audits
What audits?
supporting judicial supremacy
I don't support judicial supremacy, I support balanced checks and balances and think the presidency; Bush, Obama, Trump or Biden is too powerful for balance and ever growing moreso.
This year he has backed:
Raising taxes (anti BBB using deficit argument solely built off not raising taxes) I never said this. I favor the income tax cuts, but oppose the budget increases
Against DOGE audits No. I favored DOGE audits, though I did criticize some of the tactics used.
For inferior court judicial TROs Partly correct. This is case by case for me. Sometimes TRO's are appropriate to reign in government overreach
Pro open borders and their funding No. This is wrong. I acknowledge the government's role in controlling immigration to prevent a cultural takeover. Otherwise, I think immigrants should be free to come here to work with no welfare or assistance, but since that's not a realistic possibility I think limiting immigration is necessary. I do oppose mass deportations of non-criminal immigrants.
I do oppose mass deportations of non-criminal immigrants.
How big a batch is acceptable? Because they have not been self-deporting up to this point.
I do oppose mass deportations of non-criminal immigrants.
How do you know they are not criminals if they are illegal and were never background-checked?
I don't. I subscribe to "innocent until proven guilty."
I don't. I subscribe to "innocent until proven guilty."
Nice dodge. As an example the guy just found guilty of murdering the woman in Bel Air MD was previously found guilty of murder in his native country long before he came here. But because we had effectively open borders during this time we let him in anyway. So your plan is to let people like this stay even though they've been convicted.
The only way to keep out convicted criminals is to scrutinize them as part of the immigration process. Illegal immigration cannot screen for anything, and anyone who supports it or allowing the people who came this way to stay cannot reasonably claim to support keeping out either criminals or illegal aliens with any other disqualifying attribute. This shows people who make this claim aren't serious about it, they're just using it to deflect criticism but their real position is "everyone stays even the criminals".
There are risks in life. Freedom is always a tradoff. There are murderers in the country. There are murder preventers in the country. There are potential murder victims in the country. Should deport everyone to make sure we got all the murderers? We have thousands of murderers in the country and deporting an entire class of people hardly seems like a practical solution. It's identity politics in the extreme. Drawing the line at illegal immigrants seems arbitrary.
But, ideally part of allowing people to stay would be having people volunteer for a greencard with vetting. If you don’t want to be vetted, get deported.
Drawing the line at illegal immigrants seems arbitrary.
That's the group that should have been screened but wasn't. There's nothing arbitrary about that.
Another dodge.
It's identity politics in the extreme.
It's not identity politics at all, except in the sense that left wingers claim anything involved with immigration is identity politics which in their mind delegitimizes anything it's tied to.
As many as are here now that Trump shut off the spigot. Cut off the aid and let them decide to stay or leave.
I prefer to be around people like myself and I do sense the strain of a large proportion of immigrants, but not enough to force foreigners to uproot their lives if they're established here.
And I credit Trump with the fact that I can say that publicly without risk of major repercussions now.
As many as are here now that Trump shut off the spigot. Cut off the aid and let them decide to stay or leave.
That's the same deal Reagan made in 1986. Somehow the border remained open until 2025, and will be open again the next time the Dems win an election. The spigot can never be turned off.
Don't tell Mike that over 90% of those deported so far already had final deportation orders or had been arrested for crimes.
Most of the others are on known visa overstays.
In one breath:
“with no welfare assistance, but since that’s not a realistic possibility”
In the next breath:
“I oppose mass deportations of non-criminal immigrants”
In summary: It’s not a realistic possibility that illegals will be barred from welfare or assistance but they should be able to stay and collect anyway.
Good point.
Zeb, how is open borders into a welfare state and admitting you know they will get welfare classically liberal?
You're right. There is no feasible classic liberal solution in today's political climate. When it comes to what I consider inhumane treatment of mass deportation of settled immigrants by deporting them or letting them stay and taxing citizens for immigrants' welfare, I err to the side of letting them stay, but advocate for cutting off aid.
Do you think a classic liberal must side with mass deportations in this scenario?
I usually disagree with QB but he's willing to engage in a civilized way. I really don't like getting into the personal attacks and if I'm going to get that angry I just mute the commenter. Molly is on the list but haven't pulled the trigger yet. QB is still cool with me.
It's the sea lioning that is worse than anything. Hence he is called Mike.
It is dishonest civility.
And as for being civil, just yesterday he was engaging with sarc in mocking others. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
And as for being civil, just yesterday he was engaging with sarc in mocking others.
I don't think so. How about a link?
Yup. Mike aged like milk and so has he.
Hostility is too strong a word. I do think he can become quite disingenuous with his arguments when information starts to contradict his priors. And he does frame many topics from accepted leftist establishment perspectives. See yesterday: freaking out about Trump’s “unprecedented” actions in DC.
Basically, he’s what Michael Malice refers to as a midwit:
Concept of "Midwit"
The term "midwit" refers to individuals with above-average intelligence who may struggle with critical thinking or decision-making. Malice has discussed this concept, suggesting that midwits often regurgitate popular opinions without independent thought. This phenomenon is linked to the Dunning-Kruger effect, where individuals overestimate their knowledge or abilities.
Key Points about Midwits
Characteristics: Often lack deep understanding despite having intelligence.
Impact: Can lead to poor decision-making in societal contexts.
Cultural Commentary: Malice critiques the tendency of midwits to conform to mainstream narratives.
Michael Malice's exploration of these themes highlights the importance of independent thought in a media-saturated environment.
Do midwits ever spurge dunk?
Resistance of GOP takeover of a local police force is from a leftist establishment perspective.
Resistance of federal takeover of a local police force is from a libertarian perspective.
"He's a midwit" says the guy that just happens to agree with everything Trump does about the guy routinely posting reference article and quotes and statistics to back up his points. Honk honk!
A federal takeover of a federal district?
Yes. By declaration of emergency.
UNPRECEDENTED!
And following the letter of the law to do so.
Mike hates the law.
I don’t agree with everything Trump does. Now you’re going to lie?
Also it’s funny you still don’t understand what midwit means even after I explained it.
You're wrong again just like you were when you laughed at me for not getting the joke that never existed.
You should temper your confidence to be more in line with your intelligence.
I have NEVER seen you criticize Trump. If you say so, I'll take your word for it and rephrase to "very nearly always agrees."
Maybe importing criminals will work better than deporting them
Free the hostages. Come on. Say it.
He'll substitute "kill the jooze".
Bowser took to X to emphasize how "violent crime in DC is at its lowest level in 30 years."
I’m sure the cops have less work to do than Andy and Barney.
China Evergrande Group's delisting marks a bleak milestone for the nation's property sector, now in a fourth year of paralysis...
I'm getting mixed reporting on the health of the Chinese economy.
Trump Tariiffs!!! killed Evergrande 4 years ago. Now that, my friends, is some badass 4D chess.
I'm no dungeonmaster but wouldn't domestic tariffs crippling a foreign real estate developer 4 yrs. ago, with the players involved, be 4D Chinese Checkers?
"The White House plans to conduct a far-reaching review of Smithsonian museum exhibitions"
Thanks to the Smithsonian black museum I learned that the blacks don't work hard, don't care about their kids, are culturally disrespectful of all people, incapable of being on time, and incapable of taking care of themselves!
Why get rid of this noble institution?
Air and Space>Natural History>National Zoo>Smithsonian Gardens>Portrait Gallery>American Indian Museum
That's my order best to worst. Haven't been to the others.
As long as we are being serious
Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center, 14390 Air and Space Museum Pkwy, Chantilly, VA 20151
Is the best one. It's the air and space museum with all the stuff too big for dc
https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333
In the section, Smithsonian declares that "objective, rational, linear thinking," "quantitative emphasis," "hard work before play," and various other values are aspects and assumptions of whiteness.
The Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture had no comment for Newsweek. They referred to the website's page titled "Whiteness" when asked for additional comment. The graphic was later removed from the page.
"White dominant culture, or whiteness, refers to the ways white people and their traditions, attitudes, and ways of life have been normalized over tiem and are now considered standard practices in the United States," the introduction to the section reads. "And since white people still hold most of the institutuional power in America, we have all internalized some aspects of white culture— including people of color."
Another section says that white values include "steak and potatoes: 'bland is best'" and that white people have "no tolerance for deviation from a single god concept."
Other subsections deal with "family structure," "rugged individualism," "Protestant work ethic" and "aesthetics."
Not certain, but it sounds racist.
In the section, Smithsonian declares that "objective, rational, linear thinking," "quantitative emphasis," "hard work before play," and various other values are aspects and assumptions of whiteness.
They couldn't write better propaganda for white supremacy. Is the KKK running the Smithsonian now?
"China Evergrande Group's
I read that as "China Everglades Group" twice. Though it was about china buying up all our gators.
Those gators are federal employees now. China can't have them!
They'll just send over the gator Fang Fang to cozy up to them.
The gators are only there to protect the inmates from the pythons - - - - - - -
“The gators got your granny, chomp, chomp-chomp”
The White House plans to conduct a far-reaching review of Smithsonian museum exhibitions, materials and operations ahead of America's 250th anniversary...
Hopefully all the exhibits are informed by The 1619 Project, telling us all that America was built by trans people of color.
For 2025, the plot of a Michael Bay film as a Smithsonian Exhibit sounds about right.
Portland logic - making everything about Trump. I think this is better than saying TDS.
In a leap that can only be described as Portland logic, she almost instantly pivots from shaming him about dog breeding to accusing him of being a Trump supporter. It is as if no matter the topic, some Portlanders just cannot resist making it about Trump.
https://thatoregonlife.com/2025/08/viral-video-shows-unhinged-portland-woman-losing-her-mind-over-unethical-dogs-and-calling-stranger-a-trump-supporter/
We used to have places called insane asylums for people like her.
Still do; she’s in Portland.
How is that any different from you accusing anyone who disagrees with you of being a Democrat?
Must. Defend. Democrats.
You get called a democrat because you support democrats.
Retarded retards are retarded.
Finally some self awareness from you.
I was just discussing your politics, not your mental capacity.
What are the odds CPS was called on him more than once?
My Magic 8 Ball says the odds are very high.
Yet you have exactly zero examples of me defending Democrats, because those examples only exist in your delusional mind. Unless you're a retarded retard who interprets criticism of your team as praise for the other team. So which is it? You got an example, or are you a retarded retard? I'm going with retarded retard.
We can just look down at your comments a couple posts from here. A hallmark of liberal weasels like you is to accuse everyone of racism while demonstrating racism.
Fucking homeless twit.
Yet you have exactly zero examples of me defending Democrats…
Dumbass, both Jesse and ML have links to oodles of your comments defending Democrats.
Stop stalking him!
sarcasmic 4 months ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
At this moment in time, from what I've seen, the Democratic Party has more respect for liberty, both personal and economic, than Trump's Republican Party. Maybe the GOP will get back to its roots after Trump is no longer the party's god emperor. I hope so, but doubt it.
Want more?
"from what I've seen, the Democratic Party has more respect for liberty, both personal and economic"
This will never stop making me chuckle.
Sarckles got PWNED by his own words.
Poor sarc.
Yes.
Yes indeed, Sarcasmic.
Your typical boring, overused, ridiculous, retarded troll. Do you have any new material, Sarc?
Get help:
https://maineaa.org/
Portland Maine also applies.
Dodge! Weave! Deflect!
Your mantra, Sarcassmic?
He's parroting what he's seen a hundred different people say to Jeffy.
I don't think he understands it though.
Not just a "Democrat" though; even the slightest criticism of Trump and/or his policies gets you officially branded as a TDS-addled piece of amphibian shit.
Perhaps MAGA and Portlandia Progressives are closer on the evolutionary ladder than we thought?
Once again proving you aren’t smarter than the average commenter in the commentariat.
"...Not just a "Democrat" though; even the slightest criticism of Trump and/or his policies gets you officially branded as a TDS-addled piece of amphibian shit.>
TDS-addled slimy piles of lying shit are the poor victims (of those who notice they are TDS-addled slimy piles of lying shit).
Fuck off and die, "dumber than a bag of rocks".
Stop sockpuppeting, Sarckles.
This is again a false statement sarc. You reflexively are against anything he does. You have called him Hitler for fucks sake. You dont slightly criticize. You use every democrat narrative matter how false. You cheered the lawfare against him. Lol. Stop socking by the way.
Well, the comments section here is basically a political forum since Reason is a political magazine. It makes sense that political insults, like calling you a democrat, occur here.
In the article Bob posted, a deranged woman brought up something political out of nowhere in a non-political setting.
Hope this helps.
It won’t help. But well said.
Surprising no one, "Trump" replaces "Hitler" or "Nazi" as the Left's slur to end all arguments (in their mind).
Portland logic - making everything about Trump. I think this is better than saying TDS.
IMO, making everything about Trump and TDS are two different things.
Portland was already pretty batshit crazy to begin with. TDS is when you have people who, for 20 yrs., have been saying "Above all else, we need a political outsider, someone who isn't a career politician, who won't start another war, who will challenge longstanding status quo and bring radical change to our government, and take on the money-laundering interventionist MIC." who turn right around on virtually every principle because the dude overfed some goldfish (or didn't) or because he enjoys grabbing women by the pussy (if they let him).
Maybe those people were just cosplaying all along, but otherwise from the outside perspective, it's a genuine "After [the stroke or the concussion or they removed the tumor] it's like they're a completely different person." Like, did you really not know Donald Trump was a poon hound? You remember we agreed that the issue with Clinton was the perjury and/or his authority rather than the fact that he got a blowjob by someone other than his wife, right?
I'm watching Mr. Robot now and it feels like the same thing. The scene from Fight Club where Robert Paulson is dead and Ed Norton screams at them "You morons! You're running around in ski masks trying to blow things up ! What did you *think* was going to happen?" Like nobody ever realizes that the hard part of blowing shit up and rebuilding in the rubble is the rebuilding in the rubble.
Violent crime in DC is at its lowest level in 30 years.
Perhaps. But still plenty high enough to scare away potential visitors.
I can't imagine the horrors happening inside a private home school that violated Palo Alto city code. God forbid they were learning calculus.
I bet those kids are learning the wrong personal pronouns grammar.
The horror. 1.6M estimated illegal immigrants have left this year. The shock and catastrophe. Oh wait. Those jobs have gone to legal residents which reduces government dependency. Hmmm...
https://cis.org/Report/Overall-ForeignBorn-Population-Down-22-Million-January-July
I thought I noticed a shortage of food trucks.
Hey - You are no longer allowed in Mexican, Chinese, or Indian restaurants. Food truck prohibition also applies. Some crazy leftist broad said so.
Why would you bother to patronize a restaurant that could be run by brown or yellow trespassers who talk funny? Being the true Trump defender that you are you should be burning those places to the ground with everyone inside.
The constant use of false leftist cries of "you're racist" is one of many reasons you're called a leftist.
You cant make an intelligent argument so you resort to leftist attacks.
Seek help. The links are above.
Lot of "you" in that post.
You make a lot of asinine assumptions, Sarcassmic.
we don't all assume that other people of color, races, appearances or job are here illigally. we aren't racist like you we don't make those automatic assumptions
You defend federal agents making those same assumptions and acting upon them with violence, and then have the nerve to call me racist. Project much?
Trespassers should be met with violence.
Dude breaks into your house, you don't hope he's only stealing your stuff and wait for him to then rape your wife. You put the brakes on that shit now.
Okay, maybe not you. But rational thinking people.
Someone who has a job and is paying rent is not a trespasser. Unless you're a collectivist who believes that individual rights are trumped by the will of the mob. Which you are. Pun intended.
Yet you gleefully approved of an unarmed woman being shot for “trespassing”.
Still a retarded statement debunked by the actual taxpayer costs for your most favored group.
The hypothetical dude who broke into your house has a job and pays rent. He's still fucking trespassing when he breeched the property line. All three can be true.
Except that this guy isn't breaking into my house. He isn't breaking into your house. His only crime is lacking papers that would satisfy the soldiers you would like to see on every street corner.
I agree with sarc for once. Doubt he is a net taxpayer so it isnt him being affected by costs.
Yeah, but that guy violated your personal property. The entire country isn't collective property. Some people want the illegals on their property, some don't. So I'd say it's still a poor analogy and definitely not literally correct to call illegals "trespassers". Trespassing has a specific legal meaning.
Trespassing is the law the are guilty of.
Illegal entry.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325
trespassed; trespassing; trespasses
Synonyms of trespass
intransitive verb
1
: to commit a trespass
especially : to enter unlawfully upon the land of another
No. We understand the fucking law retard.
The same agents just deported around 30 white Irish. Lol.
But remember how yoi were against refugee status against about 50 white south africans? Meanwhile rage that temporary status is removed after 25 years into that temporary term?
Fuck off racist shit bag.
Sarc’s 25-year “temporary” drunkenness was briefly interrupted and you know how that ended. So his desire to maintain the status quo is understandable, even if you don’t agree.
Again, Sarcasmic doesn't have an argument so he screams "Raycisst". As if it's impossible for them to have immigrated legally.
Because they make sandwiches that American chefs are no longer willing to make:
The Cuban
Never heard of it.
Narrator’s voice
In today’s edition of group therapy, sarc once again demonstrates what a “strawman” is.
I saw that ladies rant I can't imagine the hate she carries to make such wild assumptions about people based on looks. I live in a town that is close to 50/50 left/right politics i can't tell who is who from appearance. though blue hair and nose rings is dead giveaway normally but those are few in between all the regular nuts
And some people just like weird hair and piercings (I agree as a rule of thumb, though).
I tout I taw a Putty cat
Actually a new food truck near me. French. And yes, I would.
Can you cite anything to prove they actually had jobs?
The last jobs report shows around 1M non citizens less for the year.
The falloff in the "total foreign-born" population was entirely comprised of non-citizens
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/seismic-plunge-us-foreign-population-down-over-2-million-since-trump-took-office/ar-AA1KsApf
Seismic Plunge: US Foreign Population Down Over 2 Million Since Trump Took Office
There was a massive and unprecedented decline in the foreign-born population in the United States between January and July of this year, with some 2.2 million fewer immigrants present in the country.
According to a Tuesday analysis of Current Population Survey data from the Center for Immigration Studies, the total "foreign-born population of all ages, both in and out of the labor force" decreased by an "unprecedented" 2.2 million during the first seven months of the year.
The falloff in the "total foreign-born" population was entirely comprised of non-citizens, as the number of naturalized U.S. citizens has "actually increased some since January," per the analysis.
Also
"A tighter labor market and higher wages may help to draw back into jobs the near-record number of working-age American men without a college degree not in the labor force," the analysis said.
Poor Sullum and Reason. They always end up looking terrible on their legal views.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/appeals-court-rules-doge-can-access-sensitive-federal-data
Has anyone started a running scoreboard for all of these cases?
Trump is cracking down on crime to distract from Epstein!!!
In reality judges are blocking the release of the files that exist.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/08/judge-denies-doj-request-to-unseal-ghislaine-maxwell-grand-jury-documents/
Ironically the judge blocked ghe release because he thought trump would use the release as a distraction from other issues.
"Trump is cracking down on crime to distract from Epstein!!!"
It's been at least a couple of weeks since Liz told us to expect Trump/Epstein documents would be pouring out.
Crickets.
I heard his support catered and the return to the GOPe was on the horizon due to epstein.
I can't imagine how the GOPe believes that if people get sick of Trump they will turn to them as a viable alternative.
If people get sick of Trump they will be turning to the Zohran Mamdani's. Not the Mitt Romney's.
There's still a whole faction of the cuckservative right, mostly in the Dispatch/Jonah Goldberg crowd, that delusionally believe this. The ones who really were in it only for the grift, such as the Lincoln Pedo Project or Kristol faction, already changed their party alignment to the Democrats.
These are the ones who really think that having Ideas and Getting Things Done are viable political policies, even when the results are absolute drizzling shit and enabled the advance of radical cultural leftism, while completely failing to cut back anything they complained about.
Yeah, that is the real danger everyone seems to be ignoring (especially in the 'the dems didn't learn anything' narrative on the right). We've hit the point in the cycle where the majority of the populace believes the system is broken so it is moving to a battle between populist right and populist left. Whichever can bring the perception of 'real change' to market first will win all the marbles.
A big reason the Democrats ended up dominating most of the 20th century political landscape is because they seized the populist energy that Theodore Roosevelt had recognized and tried to harness, and for the most part delivered on the things they said they were going to do when in power. Republicans became completely buck-broken by FDR winning four terms, and only had very brief periods of any dynamic pushback against the Dems.
The most notable rebukes were the 1972 election, because of the New Left's aggressively retarded political violence, and the 1994 congressional wipeout when the party was essentially being led by Gingrich and influenced by Limbaugh's shit-talking.
The press were so furious about the former that they mounted an informational psyop with the help of a disgruntled, petty bureaucrat to force Nixon to resign, even though he didn't do anything different in substance than Johnson and Kennedy had before him. Gingrich was energetic and charismatic enough to actually force Clinton into rolling back quite a bit of New Deal programs, although they both lucked into being in charge during a time when the country was in the first stages of a tech revolution that benefitted the economy at the time. Where Gingrich and the GOP fucked up during that period was not realizing that Bill Clinton was popular and most people really didn't give a shit about his tomcatting; if they had, he never would have been nominated in the first place. If they'd ignored Bill being a pussy hound and focused exclusively on getting Hillary, they might have actually had some success in nerfing their influence, because unlike Bill, Hillary was not popular at all and everyone could see what a viscous, entitled powermonger she really was.
This is a big reason the Epstein stuff is dying as a Democrat catspaw, and I say this as someone who's irritated about the fact that Patel, Bongino, and Bondi were talking all this shit and then blue-balled everyone.
It's not just the fact that no one in the DoJ leaked anything related to Trump from 2016-2024, which has been the glowies' entire MO during that period. It's that Democrats are actively trying to block anything from actually being released in the first place. So there either really is nothing there, and the Dems are terrified that releasing this shit will confirm it, or it implicates some very powerful people not named Trump, and no one wants to toss that grenade out on the table.
My personal belief is that it’s the latter, it implicates important people not named Trump. If there was any serious dirt on Trump in the Epstein files, the Democrats would’ve used them over the last eight years.
Add some vodka to it and this would be the healthiest drink sarc has had in years.
https://nypost.com/2025/08/07/lifestyle/heinz-and-smoothie-king-unveil-bizarre-ketchup-smoothie-and-are-hit-with-backlash-over-dirty-drink-i-fear-these-are-the-end-times/?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=nypost&utm_medium=social
Anything better than toilet cleaner and hand sanitizer is a step up for Sarckles.
"...saying in a town hall that Trump seeing homeless encampments "triggers something in him that has him believing that our very beautiful city is dirty, which it is not."..."
Do you need anything else to prove you're dealing with a TDS-addled slimy pile of lying lefty shit?
Libs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok
UPDATE: Colorado DA’s office has officially DROPPED all charges against Solomon Galligan, the registered s*x offender arrested for attempting to kidnap an 11-year-old boy during recess from an Elementary School
Galligan is now being treated at the Colorado Mental Health Hospital for mental health issues but likely to eventually be RELEASED
His defense said, when receiving the proper treatment, Galligan is a kind person who likes music, cookies, burritos, and animals.
WTF Colorado
That explains why he never hooked up with Mary Ann.
On that topic: Did anyone think Ginger was hotter than Mary Ann?
Mary Ann was beautiful and virginal.
Ginger would fuck.
Choose accordingly.
He ups the ante!
those farm girls Know whats what, Mary Ann for the win
No question.
Ginger is the one you want to be seen with, Mary Ann is the one you want in the sack.
both same-time.
Winner.
Mary Ann will make you shit, Ginger will take your shit.
When I was young it was Mary Anne all the way, but as I get older Ginger is looking better and better too.
I will take Samantha stevens
His defense said, when receiving the proper treatment, Galligan is a kind person who likes music, cookies, burritos, animals, and little boy's buttholes.
This could inspire Shrike and sloppy chemist to explore moving to Colorado.
Remember, drug addiction is valorized in Colorado now. The guy was WAY too mind-blasted by drugs to actually be declared competent to stand trial, but all they're really going to do is try and de-toxify his bloodstream just enough to declare that there's "nothing more we can do for him" before releasing this crackhead pederast back out on the streets.
Too bad there's not a John Doe to tie him up to a bed for year until he wastes away to being an actual living zombie.
Scenes from Chicago:
https://x.com/libs_ofchicago/status/1955590280603742514?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Who was it telling us they don’t get benefits? Jeffsarc?
And Mikesarc.
If that's meant to refer to me, you're wrong again. No, not wrong; lying.
You are Mike?
Yeah, I am Mike-GPT.
Speak of the devil.
Sarc Sarc Binks?
Needs work.
Try "Sarcasmike"
Or "Sarcasmix"
I was told they do not legally qualify.
Should that not stop them?
But I was told no taxpayer funding ever went to illegals.
City of Santa Ana
@CityofSantaAna
Santa Ana City Council approves $100,000 to assist residents affected by immigration enforcement
City of Santa Ana launches Ayuda Sin Fronteras program to provide resources to impacted households.
https://santa-ana.org/santa-ana-city-council-approves-100000-to-assist-residents-affected-by-immigration-enforcement/
And citizens do not seem to be asking "Hey, why am I paying the full amount for myself AND paying for these illegals as well?"
Prior to leaving office in 2020, trump declassified crossfire hurricane documents. One of Otto Penns first acts in office was to reclassify the documents.
https://x.com/RealSLokhova/status/1954522169712455815
This is what was hidden now being released, such as witnesses stating Schiff intentionally leaked classified information. Stuff reason is incurious about.
Schiff would be the ideal test case for pre-emptive pardons.
Arrest him, try him, convict him; then say "oh, wait, he has a pardon, we have to let him go, but the conviction stands".
In the real world, a pardon is only after a conviction, and only for that one thing.
Can't remember which talking head lawyer it was, but he said this would be outside the coverage of the pardon. Schiffs wasn't as broad as Hunters.
My understanding is that his pardon only covers the activity with the 1/6 Committee shitshow.
Remember this?
https://www.newsweek.com/adam-schiff-parody-donald-trump-congressional-hearing-whistleblower-complaint-ukraine-call-1461579
I think Reason has made it clear that it’s official policy to ignore any stories that make their previous reporting look bad.
... any stories requiring sourcing beyond NYT & Bloomberg.
What's The Atlantic? Chopped Liver?
Scatlantic Prediction
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/toc/2001/05/
Dude, somehow a magazine full of editors has a habit of ignoring any stories that make their *current* reporting look bad.
It was nice that Biden decided to use those docs to go after Trump and have the FBI raid his home.
I notice Reason has no beef with that.
Scenes from Kansas City, a warning to New York:
https://x.com/endwokeness/status/1955447783605117236?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
From DataRepublican in that thread:
Expect the same from Zohran the Unmagnificent.
If the city would have just invested more money, it would have worked!
"...Running a grocery store takes a surprisingly complex infrastructure.... accurately predicting demand, managing surpluses, and keeping key items in stock. They couldn't just build that from scratch, so they often had too much of the wrong things and not enough of the essentials..."
They left out that it requires someone who KNOWS WHAT THEY ARE DOING, which pretty much eliminates some bureaucrat's drunken nephew.
Or the same bureaucrat's niece with $280K in student loan debt and a gender studies degree.
I've never been a grocer, but I've managed $2M of inventory with expiry dates. Not as short as food shelf lives, but a massive pain in the ass, requiring a team with a very particular skill set. I can't imagine DMV employees succeeding at anything on this level of attention.
Zohran won't have these problems. He plans to buy in bulk.
Weekly runs to Costco, I understand.
Modern grocery stores are really massive logistics operations. It's not just a matter of finding vendors, getting a delivery schedule set up, and then the whole thing runs itself as a perpetual motion exercise. Modern Democrats are retards who don't actually understand this.
They think everything has an easy procedure which yields the "correct" answer. They've never done anything except school and government work so that's the only frame of reference that have.
Plus, having to lower prices as perishables near their expiration date.
If a persohable is on sale, it must be consumed the same day it is bought.
"...(Also, arrests are different than convictions; these folks must still wend their way through the court system.)..."
Not to mention if the suspects are released without bail and never show up for the hearing. Those who lived through Chessa Boudin's term as SFDA are well familiar with that.
It might be easier to talk about DC crime figures if DC authorities had not been cooking the books on crime figures...
https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dc-police-commander-suspended-crime-statistics/3959566/
A D.C. police commander is under investigation for allegedly making changes to crime statistics in his district.
The Metropolitan Police Department confirmed Michael Pulliam was placed on paid administrative leave in mid-May. That happened just a week after Pulliam filed an equal employment opportunity complaint against an assistant chief and the police union accused the department of deliberately falsifying crime data, according to three law enforcement sources familiar with the complaint.
The union claims police supervisors in the department manipulate crime data to make it appear violent crime has fallen considerably compared to last year.
Local news. Don't distract from Reasons new found trust government libertinism.
Meanwhile D.C. residents say at a 90% clip that crime is high.
I’ll believe crime is low when the mayor routinely walks through the city unescorted at night.
when Biden stops at stop signs while driving through D.C. all will be well.
Biden could ride his bicycle through (D)C. You hear that he’s as sharp as a tack.
Democratic Socialists having some issues with progressive intersectionality...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democratic-socialism-so-white-opinion/ar-AA1Kn0GW
And here lies Democrats' biggest challenge to selling democratic socialism to voters—especially the party's scorned and thinning racial minority base. Racial minority voters are more risk-averse in their voting behavior than white voters, and Democrats, including Mamdani, simply haven't given them strong reasons to believe in democratic socialism. Yet.
As an alternative to free-market capitalism, democratic socialism has long struggled with branding, often perceived as utopian or overly redistributive in nature. But democratic socialism also suffers from a deeper representational problem. Rallies and social media feeds tend to present its most vocal supporters as white urban millennials, upper-crust Gen Zers, and "Bernie Bros," those who ironically would seem to have both the least to gain and least to lose from aligning with democratic socialism.
Opponents peg democratic socialism as a radical, bohemian ideology that could push the U.S. toward authoritarianism, pointing to socialist governments (sans the "democratic" part) in countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua. Proponents romanticize democratic socialism, envisaging Nordic countries like Denmark and Sweden where worker-led economies and strong safety nets reign. Nordic countries though are small, culturally monolithic, and overwhelmingly white, raising real questions about whether democratic socialism could flourish in a large, racially and culturally diverse country like the U.S.
pointing to socialist governments (sans the "democratic" part) in countries like Cuba, Venezuela, and Nicaragua.
Was Nicolás Maduro not "elected"? I'm sure he would say he lives in a democratic socialist state.
It's like I've said many times in the past, Scandanvian socialism worked because it was run in countries dominated by Scandanavian socialists. And even then, they've had to moderate that with mixed programs because the money to pay for their "free" shit has to come from somewhere. But it chugged along at a small scale because these were high-trust societies.
Now that these nations are being overrun by sub-80 IQ African and Middle Eastern retards, those programs are going to start falling apart as their high-trust societies transform into low-trust societies. That's why Denmark is particularly insistent on making immigrants assimilate into Danish culture and kicking out the ones who can't hack it, instead of balkanizing immigrants into various ghettos where they aren't forced to become Danish in mindset.
I wonder how many white girls were raped by these rapefugees. Even one would be reason enough to throw them all out, with military force if necessary.
arrests are different from convictions. These folks still need to wend their way through the judicial system
According to King Rothbard of the Mises Caucus, the proper libertarian function of cops is to administer instant punishment. Subject of course to liability if they make erroneous decisions.
Which means convictions are neither necessary nor wise. The cops already executed those criminals upon arrest. That's what instant punishment means. Since the skies did not open up and suck the cops into Valhalla or Hell or wherever erroneous cops go for liability, it is clear that the arrests and executions were valid due process and those executed will now have their accusations registered as convictions.
"...According to King Rothbard of the Mises Caucus, the proper libertarian function of cops is to administer instant punishment...."
Why do I get the impression that you're a lying pile of TDS-addled lefty shit?
By night, Bowser was back to her critical tone, calling the president's actions an "authoritarian push" and saying in a town hall that Trump seeing homeless encampments "triggers something in him that has him believing that our very beautiful city is dirty, which it is not."
Yeah man, how broken do you have to be to look at this and think it detracts from the city's natural beauty?
Cultural enrichment!
And all cities are dirty.
Pigs don't think there's anything wrong with their pigpen.
I was wrong about assumptions I made when I first read about this...
https://www.the-sun.com/news/14963026/neighbour-finds-decapitated-head-spike-murder/
A NEIGHBOUR has revealed the horror moment he found a pregnant woman dead and her decapitated husband's head stuck to a spike.
Athena Georgopoulos, 39, was killed alongside her 50-year-old partner Andrew Gunn as cops found chilling graffiti scrawled outside their property.
He doesn't seem to be an Islamist...
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-13/ross-judd-court-mount-waverley-alleged-double-murder/105645746
The man accused of murdering a pregnant woman and her partner in Melbourne's south-east has been remanded in custody after facing court for the first time.
Ross Judd was charged with the murders of 39-year-old Athena Georgopoulos and 50-year-old Andrew Gunn, whose bodies were found in a unit in Mount Waverley on Monday night.
"Democratic politicians to decide whether they're going to become crime denialists or not"
Excellent quote. But I'd say their "STEAL from those 'icky' people and call it charity" pretty much already determined that that decision has already been made.
>>(Also, arrests are different than convictions; these folks must still wend their way through the court system.)
not certain aiming for the lowest common denominator in your audience is wise
>>Mexico sent 26 high-ranking cartel figures to the United States Tuesday
Does Homan know?
"...Of course, it shouldn’t surprise anyone to see Trump portraying a majority-minority city as a haven of crime and thuggery. He did the same in Los Angeles, where he dispatched the National Guard in June to terrorize the city’s mayor — his long-time political foe Karen Bass. Now Trump is hinting at expanding his deployments to Chicago and New York, two more Democratic cities with Black mayors and large minority populations.
Are you noticing a pattern?..."
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5448537-federal-takeover-washington-dc/
Yes, as is anyone with two eyes: THOSE CITIES ARE HELL-HOLES.
The ten cities in The United States with the highest murder rates per capita:
Birmingham, AL
New Orleans, LA
St. Louis, MO
Baltimore, MD
Detroit, MI
Jackson, MS
Memphis, TN
Cleveland, OH
Little Rock, AR
Milwaukee, WI
He just wants to save people's lives. How can anyone have a problem with that?
I have an idea which political party each mayor and each city council majority belong to.
Why (D)o you ask?
(D)unno. Just have an impression they might all be part of the same team.
>>Rob Henderson, the guy who popularized the phrase luxury beliefs:
heard him the other day and decided I am too genX for his type of scolding
It's an apt description though.
>>China Evergrande Group's delisting marks a ...
shining example of a misnamed concern.
Temporal Grande has left the building.
tempura grande almost oxymoron.
Mexico sent 26 high-ranking cartel figures to the United States Tuesday in the latest major deal with the Trump administration
They just offloaded a bunch of guys they were planning to kill and the new guys stepped into position immediately.
Fascism! We all now know that cutting off government funding to NGOs is fascism, plain and simple, and probably racist as well. Not to mention that PEOPLE WILL DIE!
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/s-f-nonprofit-embroiled-in-dream-keeper-scandal-warns-of-complete-shutdown/ar-AA1Kp0GF
San Francisco's efforts to cut off a nonprofit from city funding for allegedly bribing a former city official is threatening the future of the organization's programs for needy kids and their families in the Western Addition.
Attorneys for Collective Impact, the nonprofit embroiled in a scandal over its close ties to former San Francisco Human Rights Commission Executive Director Sheryl Davis, said in a legal filing Monday that the organization "anticipates a complete shutdown of its programs by October."
The attorneys were arguing against an attempt by City Attorney David Chiu to prohibit Collective Impact from receiving city funding for five years.
Chiu is seeking to debar Collective Impact after a joint investigation by his office and the controller found that the nonprofit had spent thousands on college tuition for Davis' son, paid for Davis to upgrade her flights to first class and covered costs related to her personal ventures - all while receiving millions from her department.
If your nonprofit can only survive through government money . . . then maybe you shouldn't be in business?
Isn't that what they said about companies that could afford a minimum wage hike?
Robby’s gotten pathetic. More than usual.
https://x.com/robbysoave/status/1955665811500310873?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Read for yourself and bring a barf bag. Has Robby ever seen actual male cheerleaders or an NFL game?
Usually there are a few male cheerleaders in a squad just to be there to throw the women cheerleaders up in the air and catch them and then maybe do some back flips or whatever. These guys look like they'll be joining in on the normal routines the women do. People like Robby appear to be trying to blur the line there. Do you think George W Bush was swinging his hips around and flipping his hair back and forth? Probably not.
Anyway, here's a video of these two zesty boys dancing with a bunch of hot ladies - https://x.com/Theonlyjcvolly/status/1954925068192002358
Same shit they do with drag shows.
Music Hall and comedy use crossdressing therefore highly sexualized adult drag shows are just the same thing and so its entirely appropriate to bring - nay *necessary* - your children too.
The more traditional male cheer leaders also get to hold up hot chicks by the crotch. Seems like a decent gig.
It's straight up Law of Salutory Contradiction.
They are *not* pretending to be women but when they dance like all the female cheerleaders do they are killing it!
Once again, two cowboys want to sleep in the same sleeping bag in the mountains on a cattle drive, buy a ranch that they live together on, whatever, not my business. It's the "Shut up little kid. Of course the Empreror is dressed like a man." that makes me want to tear someone's arm off and beat them to death with it.
In Europe and Japan they have mostly male cheerleaders in the literal sense of the word.
Guys with megaphones and drums who lead the fans in aggressive chants. Most are middle aged and definitely not good to look at.
Robby's OK. I just won't ask his advice on anything particularly masculine.
Why the outrage seems fairly obvious, though. Most people who appreciate the cheerleaders aren't interested in looking at some fruity looking dudes prancing around. I'm sure there are loads of gay NFL fans, but I don't think it's quite enough to justify making the spectacle gayer.
It would take some effort. Guys crammed into spandex, wearing bright colors. And they line up in front of other guys crammed into spandex wearing other bright colors. Then this one guy gets right behind other guy and puts his hands between that guy’s legs. Then he says something and they all run around chasing after the guy with the leather purse. Grabbing, sweating, grunting, more grabbing until one of them jumps on top of the guy with the purse. Then this guy wearing a third costume runs in blowing a whistle. He’ll do a pirouette. Occasionally, he’ll toss a brightly colored handkerchief. Rinse. Repeat. It has a certain homoerotic flair to it. The self propelled stomachs like it.
Why the outrage seems fairly obvious, though.
You mean the dishonesty or the fact that less than "two weeks" after stories about immigrants trying to lure little boys off of playgrounds or Abercrombie and Fitch CEOs luring minor models into sex with jobs or other gay couples raping their adoptive kids Robby tries to pull this "They're not pretending to be women." bullshit? Like he honestly thinks that there would be no problem with Lia Thomas competing in women's swimming as long as he changed in the men's locker room and wore a speedo.
He's not reporting or reacting in good faith, not trying to be honest and understand things in a manner you or anyone else would understand things to achieve any sort of best or mutually beneficial outcome. He's trying to be just honest enough that you'll believe him and/or give him what he wants.
Again, this is the guy who "to be sure"d the gay elements of an artistic depiction of 5 guys stripped, beaten, stabbed, and killed in a graveyard by Union thugs.
There have always been male cheerleaders? They're not pretending to be women.
The assertion that these men aren't pretending to be women is a lie. They just aren't trying hard enough for Robby to find it offensively dishonest.
Once again, the problem with the LGBTQIA community didn't suddenly spring up with the TQs. There is no community, it's always been an activism campaign around "2 men = 1 man + 1 woman" and the TQs were there from the beginning. Now that the TQs are a conspicuous liability (if not a lesser or less sinister threat), Robby is trying to explain how "2 men = 1 man + 1 woman" is correct when two gay guys say it but is wrong when a trans person says "If 2 men = 1 man + 1 woman then 1 woman = 1 man."
They don't care about honesty or objectivity or logic or biology, it's all about forcing other people to bend the knee. For over 50 yrs. it's been about forcing people to bend the knee.
>To some degree, Bowser and Leavitt—as well as the president himself—are conflating crime and quality-of-life issues.
Wolfe! Crime is a quality of life issue for those that experience it.
Is that the problem? All these 'empathetic' people can't actually understand the damage to other people's quality of life when they're subject to crime and live in fear?
> Is the intention, with the deployment of federal force, to get the specific carjacking crime wave under control? Or is it to curb crime more broadly? Or is it to clean up homeless encampments and make the city less dirty?
HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS ARE NEXII FOR CRIME! FFS, if you have 9 homeless criminals and one harmless homeless guy in a park you people would use the one guy to demand all 10 be left alone - you try to weaponize empathy in order to make yourself feel better at the expense of people who are being victimized.
You protect victimizers by doing this.
And the defense of the homeless encampments is even more misguided (assuming they actually care about the people), as the people living there are victimized relentlessly by the criminals among them.